Previous Page Table of Contents


ANNEXES (Cont.)

Annex 16
Air Distribution Capacities to Singapore, Hong Kong and Japan

Air Distribution Capacities to Singapore1

DayCarriers2Estimated Available Capacity in Kilograms3
MondayTG, SQ, CX68,000
TuesdayTG, SQ, CX68,000
WednesdayTG, SQ, CX, CI71,600
ThursdayTG, SQ, CX68,000
FridayTG, SQ, CX68,000
SaturdayTG, SQ, CX68,000
SundayTG, SQ, CX, CI108,000
Total Week 519,600

1 Air Capacities are subject to change without notice; based on third quarter 1980 international airline schedules. Source: Official Airline Guide.

2 TG = Thai, SQ = Singapore, CX = Cathay, CI = China

3 Assumes following capacities: B 747 = 24,000 kgs., DC10 = 16,000 kgs., L10I1= 16,000 kgs., A-300 = 14,000 kgs., DC 8/707 = 3,600 kgs.

Air Distribution Capacities to Hong Kong1

DayCarriers2Estimated Available Capacity in Kilograms3
MondayLH, TG, JL, KE, AF, CX, CI167,200
TuesdayGF, TG, CX, CI113,200
WednesdayAI, TG, JL, KE, SR, CX, CI, AZ, LH203,600
ThursdayAI, LH, TG, CX, CI140,800
FridayGF, TG, KE, CX, LH, CI139,600
SaturdayAI, TG, JL, SR, AF, CX, AZ, LH, CI213,600
SundayTG, KE, CX, CI, AZ, LH 146,800 
Total Week 1,124,800

1 Air Capacities are subject to change without notice; based on third quarter 1980 international airline schedules. Source: Official Airline Guide.

2 LH = Lufthansa, TG = Thai International, JL = Japan Airline, KE = Korean Airline, AF = Air France, CX = Cathay, CI = China, GF = Gulf Aviation, AI = Air India, SR = Swiss Air, AZ = Alitalia.

3 Assumes following capacities : B 747 = 24,000 kgs, DC-10 = 16,000 kgs, L 1011 = 16,000 kgs, A-300 = 14,000 kgs, DC8/B707 = 3,600 kgs.

Air Distribution Capacities to Tokyo1

DayCarriers2Estimated Available Capacity in Kilograms3
MondayMS, LH, JL, PA, KL, TG, SK, GA120,800
TuesdayPK, PA, TG, JL78,000
WednesdayAI, MS, JL, TG, AZ, BG, GA106,800
ThursdayAI, LH, SK, TG, JL, AZ97,600
FridayJL, PA, TG, KL89,600
SaturdayJL, PK, AI, MS, TG77,200
SundayAI, PA, TG, AZ, JL112,000
Total Week 682,000

1 Air Capacities are subject to change without notice; based on third quarter 1980 international airline schedules. Source: Official Airline Guide.

2 MS = Malaysian Airlines, LH = Lufthansa, JL = Japan Airlines, PA = Pan Am, KL = KLM, TG = Thai, SK = Scandinavian, GA = Garuda, PK = Pakistan, AZ = Alitalia, BG = Bangladesh.

3 Assumes following capacities: B747 = 24,000 kg, DC-10 = 16,000 kg, L 1011 = 16,00 kgs, A-300 = 14,000 kg, DC 8/707 = 3,600 kg.

Annex 17
Tables and Specifications for the Standard
for Shrimp/Prawn Used in Japan for Importation

Source: Japan Marine Products Importer's Association

TABLE OF SIZE/WEIGHT CONFORMITY

No. of Shrimp per PoundWeight of Each Shrimp (head-off)
10 or less43 or more grams
11 – 1529 – 43
16 – 2022 – 29
21 – 2518 – 22
26 – 3015 – 18
31 – 3513 – 15
36 – 4011 – 13
41 – 509 – 11
51 or more9 or less

Note: For Macrobrachium, the estimated weight for each prawn will be twice the stated values if with head-on.

SCORE TABLE FOR JUDGEMENT
(Where weight of unit is more than 1 kg)

Size of LotCount of SamplesCount of Defective Unit for Judgement
PassedDefective
1–10All01
11–1001012
101–5001512
501–1,0002523
1,001–5,0003534
More than 5,0015045

SCORE TABLE FOR JUDGEMENT
(Where weight of unit is less than 1 kg)

Size of LotCount of SamplesCount of Defective Unit for Judgement
PassedDefective
35–1,0003534
1,001–5,0005045
5,001–10,0007567
10,001–20,00011089
20,001–50,0001501011
More than 50,0012251415

SPECIFICATION FOR MARKING

Provisions Specification for MarkingMark
Appearance1)The shrimp (prawn), whole, which holds the original from without being split or broken. The shrimp (prawn), headless, which has the head part (“carapace”) completely removed, and holds the good form without being split or broken.5
2)The shrimp (prawn), whole which holds the fairly good form, or being slightly split or broken, has the head part almost completely removed, holds fairly good form or being slightly split or broken According to the degree of the above mentioned defects.4-3
3)The shrimp (prawn), whole, which does not hold good form, being split or broken, headless, which leaves apart of the head unremoved, does not hold the good form, or being split or broken.2
4)The shrimp (prawn), whole, which is deformed conspicuosly, or being split or broken conspicously, headless, which leaves the greater part of the head unremoved, or being deformed, split or broken conspicously.1
Color1)The shrimp (prawn), which keeps such color as characteristic of particular species of shrimps (prawns) without any sign of the grayish white caused by dehydration, or other change of color.5
2)The shrimp (prawn), which keeps fairly good color or gives slight sign of the grayish white caused by dehydration, or other color changes, according to the degree of the above mentioned defects.4-3
3)The shrimp (prawn), which does not keep the good color, or gives the sign of grayish white caused by dehydration or other color changes. The shrimp (prawn) which possesses dark color in the tail part.2
4)The shrimp (prawn), which is discolored conspicuously or gives cospicuous sign of the grayish white caused by dehydration or other changes of color.1
Flavor and odor1)The shrimp (prawn), which keeps the good original flavor, being free from such odor as of hydrogen sulphide, ammonia, trimethylamine or any other else that is not characteristic of particular species of shrimp (prawn)5
2)The shrimp (prawn), which keeps the fairly good flavor, or almost being free from such odors as hydrogen sulphide, ammonia, trimethylamine or nay other else that is not characteristic of particular species of shrimp (prawn), according to the degree of the above mentioned defects.4-3
3)The shrimp (prawn), which does not keep the good flavor, or gives such odors as of hydrogen sulphide or any other else not characteristic of particular species of shrimp (prawn).2
4)The shrimp (prawn), which keeps hardly any flavor or gives conspicuously such odors as of hydrogen sulphide, ammonia, trimethyliamine, or any other else that is not characteristic of particular species of shrimp (prawn).1
Tissue or Texture1)The shrimp (prawn), which is reasonably tight and elastic in its tissue without signs of the sponge-like or other abnormal tissues that is not characteristic of particular species of shrimp (prawn).5
2)The shrimp (prawn), which is fairly tight and elastic in its tissue, or gives slight sign of the sponge-like or other abnormal tissue that is not characteristic of particular species of shrimp (prawn), according to the degree of the above mentioned defects.4-3
3)The shrimp (prawn), which lacks the reasonable or fair tightness and elastic in its tissue, or gives sign of the sponge-like or other abnormal tissue that is not characteristic of particular species of shrimp (prawn).2
4)The shrimp (prawn), which is too soft in its tissue or gives cospicuous sign of the sponge-like or other abnormal tissue that is not characteristic of particular species of shrimp (prawn).1
Uniformity1)The block of shrimps (prawns) which does not mix any different species or “soft shell” caused by exuviation.5
2)The block of shrimps (prawns) which mixes hardly any different species or “soft shell” caused by exuviation, according to the mixed degree of the different species or “soft shell”.4-3
3)The block of shrimps (prawns) which mixes different species or “soft shell” caused by exuviation.2
4)The block of shrimps (prawns) which mixes different species or “soft shell” caused by exuviation conspicuously.1
Undesirable Substances1)The block of shrimps (prawns) which is free from the splintered shell, spines, legs, or any other undesirable substances separated from the body of the shrimp (prawn).5
2)The block of shrimps (prawns) which is fairly free from the splintered shell, spines, legs, or any other undesirable substance separated from the body of the shrimp (prawn), according to the mixed degree of the above mentioned undesirable substance.4-3
3)The block os shrimps (prawns) which contains the splintered shell, spines, legs, or any other undesirable substance separated from the body of the shrimps (prawn).2
4)The block of shrimps (prawns) which contains the splintered shell, spines, legs, or any other undesirable substance separated from the body of the shrimps (prawns) conspicuously.1
Glaze (In the case that packings as will insure against dehydration are used, the glaze will not be necessary)1)The glaze is clean, thick and even enough to prevent dehydration.5
2)The glaze is clean, and fairly thick and even, according to the degree of the above mentioned glazed conditions.4-3
3)The glaze is clean, but there is an area without glaze on the surface of the block.2
4)The glaze is not clean, or there is hardly any area glazed on the surface of the block,1

Annex 18
Processing and Packing Specifications

Type of Boxes

Box No. 1 - Styrofoam box (L 48 cm × W 35 cm × H 32 cm)

Box No. 2 - Corrugated fiberboard box (L 42 cm × W 30 × H 25 cm)

Box No. 3 - Box No. 2 line with 1 inch thick styrofoam sheet

Packing materials

  1. Dry ice

  2. Water absorbing paper-newspaper

  3. Polyethylene sheet

  4. Gummed tape

Experiment #1

Packing methods

  1. Lined the box with polyethylene sheet

  2. Approximately 2/5 of dry ice was put on the bottom of the box

  3. Wrapped the prawn with wet newspaper and placed on dry ice in alternative layers

  4. Used 1/5 of dry ice between each layer of prawn and put the rest of dry ice on the top

  5. Wrapped polyethylene sheet over the product and seal the container with gummed tape

  6. Kept the container at room temperature

Experiment #2

Two boxes of those No. 2 and No. 3 were used. Packing materials were the same as above with addition of moistened and cooled sawdust (2°C).

Packing methods

Packing procedure was the same as Experiments #1 except that the quantity and type of packing media were changed as indicated in Table 2.

Annex 19
Ratio of Prawn and Packing Media and Quality of Prawn in Experiment 1

Type of Boxes ContainerWt.of Prawn
(kg)
Wt. of dry ice
(kg)
Ratio* of D : PTemp (°C) StartTemp (°C) After 21hrs.TVB mgN/100gmIndole ug/100 gmTVC No./gmOrganoleptic Evaluation
Control----2°C5.900.1002.0×105 
Box No. 1551:1-27°7 hr. 7637 hr. 0.125 All samples were frozen Prawn were in good or excellent conditions.
14 hr. 11.9714 hr. 1.000 
21 hr. 13.4421 hr. 0.6253.9×105
Box No. 2451:0.8-3°7 hr. 9.107 hr. 5.000 
14 hr. 20.4414 hr. 0.250 
21 hr. 20.5821 hr. 0.1253.8×105
Box No. 333.71:0.8-2°7 hr. 8.967 hr. 1.250 
14 hr. 13.1614 hr. 0.875 
21 hr. 12.3221 hr. 0.2504.7×105

* Ratio - D : P = Dry ice : Prawn

Annex 20
Ratio of Prawn and Packing Media and Qaulity of Prawn in Experiment 2

Type of BoxesWt. of Prawn
(kg.)
Wt. of dry ice
(kg.)
Wt. of Sawdust
(kg.)
Ratio* of D:P D:S:P S:PTotal Wt. (kg.) StartTotal Wt. (kg.) After 19 hrTemp (°C) StartTemp (°C) After 19 hrTVB mgN/100gmIndole ug/100gmTVC No/gmOrganoleptic Evaluation
Control----
D:P
---9.660.6251.75×105Mixture of class 1+11
Box No. 2-15.02.0-1:2.5
D:S:P
8.66.64.813.930.7503.10×105"
Box No. 2-25.01.32.51:2:3.8
D:P
10.08.75.0°8.5°15.051.5002.50×105"
Box No. 3-14.01.5-1:2.6
S:P
6.85.32.0°8.0°14.701.2507.30×105"
Box No. 3-2**3.8-2.51:1.57.87.86.0°11.0°16.101.7501.70×105"

* Ratio D:P - Dry ice : Prawn
D:S:P- Dry ice : Sawdust : Prawn
S:P - Sawdust : Prawn

** Box No. 3-2 was kept in refrigerator at 4–6°C

Annex 21
The Relationship between Changes in Time and Temperature

Experiment 2

No.2-1-Corrugated fiberboard box with dry ice.
No.2-2-Box No. 2-1 with sawdust and dry ice.
No.3-1-Lined box, with dry ice.
No.3-2-Lined box, with sawdust.

Annex 22
History of the Brine Shrimp Industry

First records of the brine shrimp (Artemia sp.), date back to 1975 in works of Schosser (ref. Kuenen - 1939 and Baas - Becking - 1931). Although these references were scientific in nature, it is known that Artemia was used long before by some ethnic groups in Africa as human food source. As described by Lloyd Cabot Briggs in “Tribes of the Sahara”, “Small water worms… are collected and pounded together with a little salt until the mixture becomes a black paste, which is then rolled into balls the size of a big orange and set out in the sun to dry. The finished product is then eaten using a greasy sauce with millet or barley bread” (Los Angeles Times, August, 1979).

Brine Shrimp is a “filtering animal” which exists in saline bodies of water, usually absent of all other forms of predation. In different parts of the world, it is referred to by such names as brine worms, dood, dud, salt worms, and water boatmen. The adult animal is 8 to 10 mm long, has eleven pairs of thorocopods, stalked lateral eyes, and sensorial antennalae.

Most natural occurances of brine shrimp are found north of the Tropic of Cancer or the South of the Tropic of Capricorn. This observation is most likely related to the life cycle patterns of Artemia and climatical conditions associated to most equatorial regions. Under normal seasonal conditions (four seasons locations), brine shrimp display oviparity behavior (production of cyst or eggs). This behavior pattern is usually triggered by increasing salinity from summer evaporation, lack of food, decreased oxygen levels, and by decreasing temperatures during the fall. Cyst production is the propagation mechanism to carry the organism through the winter months. During the spring, rainfall, or snow melt-off dilute the high saline waters, triggering cyst metabolism and subsequent hatching to complete the seasonal life cycle.

In equatorial regions harboring Artemia, the organism displays oviviparous (internal egg production with live birth), as well as oviparous behavior. Salinity and temperature tend to be the more important factors as to whether cysts are produced. At lower salinities (usually less than 70 parts per thousand), brine shrimp generally are oviviparous and seldom produce cysts.

Observations of many tropical locations like the Philippines, Christmas Island, Colombia, and Venezuela, seem to indicate that precipitation maintains the salinas at the lower ranges. Often, when the salinity drops below 80 ppt (from seasonal monsoon), predation becomes the main barrier to further propagation (Tilapia mossambica has been observed in Artemia ponds of 75 to 80 ppt.)

Salt Lakes, land-locked estuaries, brine ponds, and salterns with Artemia are found all over the world (see map at end of this Annex). The phyllopod is highly adaptive to ecological conditions and has been known to exist even in crystallization ponds. Under such conditions, primary food sources for the animal come from the limited bacterial and algae species which can survive the high saline conditions. The harsh environment, while limiting food sources to monoculture of specific algae groups, also provides the only source of protection for the organism from predators commonly found in marine waters.

Prior to the 1930's, brine shrimp had little commercial value and was primarily used for physiological and morphological study. In 1939, Rollefsen first linked the importance of using newly hatched Artemia salina (nauplii) to the larval development of the fry in marine fish. Since then, it has been widely recognized that the nauplii of brine shrimp is the key to the development of aquaculture, both for ornamental tropical fish and more importantly for commercial food production. The importance of Artemia for aquaculture was recently posed as a question to the scientific community at the First International Symposium on the Brine Shrimp (Corpus Christi, Texas, August, 1979):

“Why do herbivores and carnivores alike, tend to prefer this food substance (Artemia) over their natural diets… an organism which exists in none of their natural habitats?”

During the 1940's, most commercially available brine shrimp products (mostly cysts), represented collections from natural saline lakes and tidal estuaries. With the growing interest for tropical fish as a hobby in the late 1940's, commercial value was attached to brine shrimp, thereby establishing the industry. Early industry pioneers exploited the cyst production of Artemia in 1951 at the Great Salt Lake in Utah. First harvests of the Lake yielded in excess of 16,000 kgs. of finished product, with a market value exceeding Baht 3,000,000. While commercial exploitation of natural sources proved to be economically viable, it was by and large highly unpredictable. During the mid-1950's, commercial attention for brine shrimp was turned to controlled sources for production in the San Francisco Bay region. Here, it was found that brine shrimp and their cysts could be produced as a by-product of salt evaporation operations. Since salt production entails controlled salinities during the evaporation process, yearly cyst and bio-mass productions could be predicted.

The industry as it exists today, consists of five forms of brine shrimp products. Artemia is sold live, catering mostly to the freshwater and marine tropical fish hobbyist. Most live sales are limited to metropolitan areas of close proximity to the production source. Frozen distribution is widespread in the United States and Europe, and also targets for the tropical fish hobbyist as the major consumer. Freeze dried brine shrimp and brine shrimp flakes are diet supplements intended for hobbyist consumption. Perhaps the most commercially important product for aquacultural use is the cyst produced by the animal. Nauplii which hatch out of the cysts are one of the few “perfect” foods found to facilitate proper larval development in most crustacea cultures (shrimp, prawns, crabs, lobsters, etc.,), brackish water and saltwater fish rearing programs. It is also used as the cornerstone nutrient for most developing tropical fish fry.

The locations from which Artemia may be harvested for study or for commercial value are numerous. At least six sibling species are known to inhabit the more than 125 identified sources of brine shrimp. Of all locations however, only seven are currently considered economically viable as a result of productive capacity or by proximity to market. Of the seven production sights; San Francisco Bay (California), Great Salt Lake (Utah), Buenos Aires (Agentina), Sharks Bay (Australia), Mono Lake (California), Macau (Brazil), and Chaplin Lake (Saskatchewan), only Macau represents a non-natural occurance location (innoculated by man in 1977).

Recently, innoculation experiments in Thailand, India, Mexico, and Peru have shown favourable results. While production levels in these countries are still experimental, proper development may turn these areas into commercially viable sources.

References

Baas-Becking, L.G.M. (1931). Historical notes on salt and salt manufacturing. Science Monthly 32: 434–446.

Kuenen, D.J. (1939). Systematical and physiological notes on the brine shrimp Artemia. Arch. neerl. Sool. 3: 365–449.

Annex 23
Artemia Cyst Inspection and Hatch Evaluation Methodology

  1. Visual Inspection:

    1. Check for debris factor/cracked shells with low power stereoscope.

    2. Consistancy check - where does product level measure up to in the tin? How much settling or head space is there in the tin and is this level consistant from tin to tin. Measure the cyst weight/volume relationship.

  2. Moisture Test:

    1. Weigh out one gram ± 1% of homogenized product. Set in petri dish to which scale has been adjusted for tare of the dish.

    2. Place in dehydrator, not to exceed 60 degrees Centigrade for 15 minutes.

    3. Reweigh sample to ± 1% and determine percent weight lost.

    4. Acceptable levels should be not greater than 8% and not less than 4% moisture content.

  3. Refrigeration: Before any test is conducted on cysts kept in cold storage, cysts must be allowed to stand at room temperature for at least a week. Similarly, cysts to be used or hatched for larval feed will hatch out with better results if the cysts are allowed to stand at ambient temperature for a week, if the cyst is stored in cold storage or in a refrigerator prior to use.

  4. Hatching Solution Preparation:

    1. Mix hydration/hatching solution to prescribed levels of special gravity for each strain (usually recommended by manufacturer or producer).

    2. Place solution in separatory funnel to 1 litre volume and insert aeration tube (straight standard glass pipette tubing adjoined to airline is sufficient). Aerate to “roll” solution well to water rim in funnel. Mark 1 litre level on funnel.

    3. Emerse funnel on stand into circulating water bath heated and maintained at 27°C by a thermostatically controlled heater. Water should constantly be circulated by submersible water pump. This system will assure constant water temperature for all testing funnels placed in the same bath.

  5. Total Number of Dry Cysts per Gram Determination: Synopsis: In order to determine a true percentage of hatching efficiency, total dry cysts/gr must be determined. Cysts will vary is size and density depending on the strain of Artemia used and/or within the same strain if the cysts have been harvested at different times during the production season.

    1. Weigh out representative samples of 1 gram of cysts to ± 1%. If testing several tins, separate tests may be run on each tin, or tins can be homogenized for single batch tests.

    2. Place one gram sample of cysts in hatching funnel and let hydrate for two (2) hours, however after one hour, wash down sides of funnel with squeeze water bottle (wash bottle), to re-emerse cysts pulled to sides by capillary action.

    3. After 2 hours of hydration, and before determination of dry cyst/gr procedure, again, wash cysts from sides of funnel. Fill solution back to the 1 litre mark to compensate for evaporation.

    4. One (1) ml samples of cysts and solution should be drawn with an automatic 1 ml pipette, midway in the funnel while aeration is in process. Make sure no bubbles are drawn with sample.

    5. Discharge pipette on large viewing glass slide or large petri dish drop by drop to matrix sample. This procedure allows for easier viewing under low power stereoscope (40 power sufficient).

    6. Under stereoscope, count only hydrated cysts (not debris). Test four sub-samples from each funnel to minimize counting error.

    7. Total dry cysts/gr is then determined by multiplying mean cyst counts (average) by 1,000.

  6. Determination of Hatching Efficiency:

    1. Follow procedures in 5(a) through (e) except no cysts counts will be made.

    2. While tests are normally run for 48 hours, some institutions will test at 24, 36, and 48 hours. Procedures outlined here are for 48 hour tests.

    3. When pipette sample containing nauplii has been discharged onto glass slide or petri dish, make sure pipette tip is washed down to get any nauplii that may have adhered to inside of tip.

    4. Expose slide or petri dish to infarred heat source to kill nauplii, but do not evaporate sample droplets in the matrix. An alternate procedure to immobilize the nauplii for counting is to anesthetize the nauplii.

    5. Count nauplii under stereoscope, including in the count only fully formed nauplii that are separated from the shell. Exclude deformed nauplii from count. Do not count shells or debris.

    6. Total nauplii/gram is then determined by taking mean counts (average) of nauplii and multiplying by 1,000. Again, to minimize counting error, it is suggested that four sub samples be taken from each funnel.

    7. Record date, time, temperature, salinity, and counts.

  7. Determination of Percent of Hatch: To compute the percent of hatch, divide the nauplii/gram by the dry cysts/gram extracted from procedures 5 and 6 above:

Annex 24
Existing Static System

Most rai in production utilize static systems of production. Static systems allow salinity to increase within the same pond over a wide range before the water is moved to the next pond for further evaporation. Static systems are evident where land holdings may be limited (total ownership of a farmer under four ponds or where total rai is not sufficient for alternative considerations). Static systems require support ponds from which it draws water of a certain salinity range and ponds to which it discharges higher salinity waters it has processed. Through expanded experimentation of the Chacheongsao Fisheries Station, most static systems currently producing cyst have been Trenched, allowing for better temperature regulation. While static systems are capable of producing cysts, the Artemia popultaion is not necessarily kept at optimal densities for maximizing the production of cyst. Four major disadvantages to the systems are: 1) Different ranges of salinity tends to foster different cultures of algae/phytoplankton. 2) Artemia populations may physiologically adapt to the salinity change, affecting the level of oviparous versus oviviparous tendencies, 3) during the periods of evaporation, there is little circulation allowing some stagnation, and 4) there is little control over the fertilization/algal bloom/Artemia population blooms/algal depletion/Artemia population crash cycle which often occur in static systems.

Support Pond Pond filled and diked, allowed to evaporate from sea salinity (35%) to 70% then transferred to next static systemStatic System Receives water at some level (70%) diked and allowed to evaporate to higher level 70% to 160% before transfer to next system
      ↑
Support Pond for accepting high salinity water for crystalization (160% to saturation)

Currently, these ponds are Trenched and all fertilization occurs in same pond.

Annex 25
Alternative Cost Matrix per Productive Rai (in Baht)

Alternative Production Units:Existing Static SystemModified Two Stage SystemFlow Through System
Fixed Cost Elements per rai-Startup:
Escavation1:   
For 30 cm Trench System
(Approximately 100 cm water depth)
   
Manual Labor at 25 ฿/cu.m.
2,4004,8004,800–7,200
Mechanized at 13 ฿/cu.m.
1,2482,4962,496–3,744
For 60 cm Trench System
(Approximately 150 cm water depth)
   
Manual Labor at 25 ฿/cu.m.
4,8009,6009,600–14,400
Mechanized at 13฿/cu.m.
2,4964,9924,992–7,488
Hardware (net, poles, etc.,)300300500
Variable Cost Elements per Rai per Month:
Pumping (water)2:000
Fertilizer3:484872
Labor for collection of cysts/fertilizing4:117117117
Total Variable Cost per rai per month:
165165189

1 Estimates of current costs for escavation from engineering staff at Chacheongsao Fisheries Station.

2 Artemia production alternatives presented represent by-product operations from salt production systems. Pumping cost are assumed by the salt operations since farms are not intended for complete conversion to Artemia production.

3 Fertilizer cost based on used of chicken manure; 200–300 kgs per rai per month. In some regions where manure is not readily available, use of urea may result in higher cost.

4 Assumes unskilled labor to collect by net, the daily cyst production (30 days per month) and fertilization. Daily labor rates used = 47฿. Time requirements for collection is 40 minutes per day or 3.92 ฿ per day maintenaince.

Calculations of Escavations and Total Water Depth

Assumptions: 1) All calculations use a standard rai measuring 40 m by 40 m.

2) All existing salt evaporation ponds have an average depth of 30 cm.

3) Trenches are escavated 2 m. wide.

30 cm Trench: Earth removed = 96 cubic meters (40 m ×2 m × 30 cm × 4 sides = 96 cubic meters).

Water depth = Original water depth = 30 cm, escavation depth = 30 cm, berm addition from escavation = 30–40 cm. (assumes berm width of 1.5 meters), total water depth after escavation = 100 cm.

60 cm Trench: Earth removed = 192 cubic meters (40 m × 2 m × 60 cm × 4 sides = 192 cubic meters).

Water depth = Original water depth = 60 cm, escavation depth = 30 cm, berm addition from escavation = 60 cm (assumes berms width of 1.5 meters), total water depth after escavation = 150 cm.

Annex 26
Modified Two Stage System

The modified two stage system is a series of two ponds which maximizes the efficiency of salinity range for cyst production. The system differs from the currently used static system in that each of the two ponds is maintained at relative constant salinity, one flowing into the other at a rate equal to maintain the salinity of the second pond. The salinity between both ponds may differ by as much as 40%. This difference is used to stimulate and accelerate cyst production (oviparous tendency). The two stage system requires more management by the farmer to control salinities and maintaining the difference between ponds. It also requires the trenching of both ponds or a doubling of investment (Annex 25). In starting up the system, salinity is stablized by filling both ponds from surrounding other salt production ponds to achieve the desired salinity levels in each. Like the static system, the two stage requires “support” ponds from which to draw input water and to discharge higher saline water (into crystalization ponds).

Lower Salinity Input Support Pond(s)First Stage (Trenched) 80–100 Parts per Thousand
Primary Bio-Mass Pond (May produce Cyst)
Second Stage (Trenched) 140–160 Parts per Thousand
Primary Cyst Pond (Most Cyst Produced here)
Crystalization Higher Salinity Discharge Pond(s)

Annex 27
Flow Through System

The flow through system is based on a series of ponds, each with a succeedingly higher salinity. All nutrients flow through the system, therefore pond management is accomplished in the bio-mass pond. Salinity management involves the regulation of flow such that all ponds become more saline in the direction of flow without stopping the flow.

Pond DesignatorWater Depth in cmDesired SalinityDesignation 
Per meterCenter
    Predation
A303050–80Elimination
    Primary
    Fertilization
B303070–100Innoculation
    Secondary
    Fertilization
C100–15030100–140Primary
    Bio-mass
    (Trenched)
D10030140–160Secondary
    Bio-mass/Cyst Inducement
    (Trenched)
E3030160–200Cyst Production
    Die off Pond
Fless than 30less than 30over 200Crystalization

Annex 28
Adaptation of Flow Through System to An Existing
Salt Evaporation Pond

Not all farms will be ideally designed to create linear flow through systems as described in Annex 27. The concept of flow through systems however, can be implemented with some modification to existing designs without affecting salt production. For example, a salt farm 12 rai in size (Chacheongsao Province) is depicted as it exist today and under the flow through. Reference pond designation A-F in Annex 27.

Annex 29
Incremental Processing Costs for Three-fold Expansion at Chacheongsao Fisheries Station

Equipment (Supplies/equipment Made locally or purchased):Cost in Baht
Washing Sieves
1,200
Conical fiberglass containers (2) 1,500 ฿ each
3,000
Used washing machine
2,000
Wooden muslin Cloth tables-total 30 meters
4,000
Miscellaneous: fittings, salt, cloth bags and pumping costs
1,800
Total estimated equipment/utility cost
12,000 Baht
Labor Costs1 = 1 technician for 6 months
24,000
Total incremental cost for first six month season
36,000 Baht
Total estimated cyst production in first six month season2=     12,000 wet kgs.
Total incremental cost per wet kilogram to process3=             3 Baht/wet kg.
(36,000/12,000 kgs wet = 3 Baht/wet kg.)
or     6 Baht/dry kg.
Incremental Labor Costs for second season4=             2 Baht/wet kg.
(24,000/12,000 kg wet = 2 Baht/wet kg.)
or     4 Baht/dry kg.

1 Assumes technician is committed full time to cyst processing at Chacheongsao, labor cost for skilled technician = ฿ 4,000/month, source Dr. Y. Shang, 1980.

2 Based on 250 productive rai each yielding 8 kgs wet weight of cyst/month.

3 All equipment cost amortized over first six month processing season.

4 Only Labor cost applicable to second and subsequent seasons.

Annex 30
Current Pricing Structure of Brine Shrimp
Cyst Available in Thailand

(Cost/Pricing Levels/kg)

Production and Sales ElementsCurrent Cost Elements Include in Selling Price for Thai CystFully Allocated Costs of Thai Cyst to be Competitive with Imported Foreign CystCompetitive Foreign Cyst Cost Structure Exported to Thailand4Proposed Price Structure of Thai Cyst for Export Competitive with Foreign Cys
Cyst Production/kg1350 ฿350 ฿  225 ฿
Processing:     
Loss Factor2
350 ฿350 ฿  225 ฿
Labor/Overhead3
053 ฿  35 ฿
Marketing/Sales1,500 ฿1,347 ฿  485 ฿
   LowHigh 
F.O.B. 5 (Domestic Selling Price for Cyst at Origin)2,200 ฿2,100 ฿530 ฿970 ฿N/A (not applicable)
C.I.F.6 (Domestic Landed Price)  690 ฿1,260 ฿N/A
Agents Commission7 (Domestic Marketing effort)  1,070 ฿840 ฿N/A
Selling Price of Foreign8 Cyst in Thailand  1,760 ฿2,100 ฿N/A
Competitive F.O.B. Price for Thai Export Cyst    970 ฿

1 Production cost vary depending on economics of production units. Since most all commercial units are currently by-product operations from salt production or natural harvest from lakes, actual production cost include some level to cover cyst harvesting labor, pond modification, and harvesting hardware. Where capital input is required for cyst production, the cost includes amortization.

2 Processing Loss factor is caculated as the cyst waste factor required to bring the product up to marketing/competitive standards. In the case of Thai cyst, the ratio is two to one; ie. two kg of cyst needed to extract one kg of saleable cyst with minimum performance levels of 70% hatchability.

3 Processing Labor and overhead is figured at 15% of the Processing Loss factor value and include contribution for processing, utilities, quality control, packing and labeling.

4 Low and High Price levels determined by average of price range F.O.B. U.S.A. of four major supplying companies.

5 F.O.B. Thailand price for domestic sales established by survey of Macrobrachium hatcheries.

6 C.I.F. Thailand landed price computed at 130% of export F.O.B. price at origin.

7 Agents commission estimated at difference of Landed cost and Selling price in Thailand May include commissions of middlemen in Thailand.

8 Selling price of imported cysts obtained through survey of Macrobrachium hatcheries.

Annex 31
Alternative Production/Revenue Matrix per Productive Rai
1

Alternative Production Units:Existing Static SystemModified Two Stage SystemFlow Through System
Production Per Month (kgs. Processed weight):   
For 30 cm Trench System:4 kg (currently being achieved)4.6 kg (estimated)5.6 kg (estimated)
For 60 cm Trench System:4.4 kg (estimated)5.1 kg (estimated)6.2 kg (estimated)
Revenue to Salt Farmer per month (Baht/Total kgs):   
For 30 cm Trench System:   
- Revenue to farmer under current pricing structure22,800฿3,220฿3,920฿
- Revenue to farmer when cost fully allocated and cyst sold domestically competitive with imported cyst32,800฿3,220฿3,920฿
- Revenue to farmer when cost fully allocated and cyst sold domestically or for export and competitively as foreign cyst F.O.B. at origin31,800฿2,070฿2,520฿
For 60 cm Trench System:   
- Revenue to farmer under current pricing structure23,080฿3,570฿4,340฿
- Revenue to farmer when cost fully allocated and cyst sold domestically competitive with imported cyst33,080฿3,570฿4,340฿
- Revenue to farmer when cost fully allocated and cyst sold domestically or for export and competitively as foreign cyst F.O.B. at origin31,980฿2,295฿2,790฿

1 Productive year is assumed to run from January through June, while November marks the start of dry season, the first two months of each dry season is generally non-productive and represents startup dwell time for phytoplankton/algae culturing, fertilization, pond modification and repair.

2 Revenue paid to salt farmers engaged in Artemia production is artificially high to encourage the development of the industry. Farmers are paid 350 ฿/kg wet weight for their production. Processing reduction for Thai cysts is currently at 50%. Therefore, dry weight or processed cost is 700 ฿/kg. No processing, marketing, commissions (or operating profits) are currently computed in farmer's revenue and such functions are now performed by the Chacheongsao Fisheries Station as subsidized developmental assistance to promote the production aspects.

3 Fully allocated cost - see Annex 33.

Annex 32
Farmer's Profitability Matrix of Alternative Production Systems
1
Per Rai Per Month Under Different Pricing Structures

(All Figures in Baht)

Alternative Production Units:Existing Static SystemModified Two Stage SystemFlow Through System
For 30 cm Trench System:   
1) Current Price/Cost not fully allocated:   
Manual
2,4102,6303,189
Mechanized
2,5062,8223,429
2) Current Price/Cost fully allocated:   
Manual
2,4102,6303,189
Mechanized
2,5062,8223,429
3) Export Pricing/Competitive to Foreign Cyst at Origin   
Manual
1,4101,4801,789
Mechanized
1,5061,6722,029
For 60 cm Trench System:   
1) Current Price/Cost not fully allocated:   
Manual
2,4902,5803,109
Mechanized
2,6822,9643,820
2) Current Price/Cost not fully allocated:   
Manual
2,4902,5803,109
Mechanized
2,6822,9643,820
3) Export Pricing/Competitive to Foreign Cyst at Origin   
Manual
1,3901,3051,559
Mechanized
1,5821,6892,270

1 Profitability Analysis in Annex 32-1, 32-2, 32-3.

Annex 32-1

Profitability Analysis of Alternative Production Systems1
Per Rai Per Month Under Current Pricing Not Fully Allocated Costs

(All Figures in Baht)

Alternative Production Units:Existing Static SystemModified Two Stage SystemFlow Through System
For 30 cm Trench System:   
Revenue:
2,8003,2203,920
Cost:
   
Fixed2 Manual:
200400400–6003
Mechanized:
104208208–312
Hardware:
252542
Variable:
165165189
Total Cost Manual:
390590731
Mechanized:
294398491
Profit/Rai/Month: Manual:
2,4102,6303,189
Mechanized:
2,5062,8223,429
For 60 cm Trench System:   
Revenue:
3,0803,5704,340
Cost:
   
Fixed2 Manual:
400800800–1,200 3
Mechanized:
208416416–624
Hardware:
252542
Variable:
165165189
Total Cost Manual:
5909901,231
Mechanized:
389606520
Profit/Rai/Month: Manual:
2,4902,5803,109
Mechanized:
2,6822,9643,820

Annex 32-2

Profitability Analysis of Alternative Production Systems1
Per Rai Per Month Assuming Full Cost Allocation and Competive
Pricing Structure with Imported Brine Shrimp Eggs

(All Figures in Baht)

Alternative Production Units:Existing Static SystemModified Two Stage SystemFlow Through System
For 30 cm Trench system:   
Revenue:
2,8003,2203,920
Cost:
   
Fixed2 Manual
200400400–6003
Mechanized
104208208–312
Hardware
252542
Variable:
165165189
Total Cost Manual
390590731
Mechanized
294398491
Profit/Rai/Month: Manual
2,4102,6303,189
Mechanized
2,5062,8223,429
For 60 cm Trench System:   
Revenue:
3,0803,5704,340
Cost:
   
Fixed2Manual
400800800–1,2003
Mechanized
208416416–624
Hardware
252542
Variable:
165165189
Total Cost Manual
5909901,231
Mechanized
398606520
Profit/Rai/Month: Manual
2,4902,5803,109
Mechanized
2,6822,9643,820

Annex 32-3

Profitability Analysis of Alternative Production Systems1
Per Rai Per Month Assuming Full Cost Allocation and Pricing
Structure for Export Similar to Foreign Cyst at Origin

(All Figures in Baht)

Alternative Production Units:Existing Static SystemModified Two Stage SystemFlow Through System
For 30 cm Trench System:   
Revenue:
1,8002,0702,520
Cost:
   
Fixed2 Manual
200400400–6003
Mechanized
104208208–312
Hardware
252542
Variable:
165165189
Total Cost Manual
390590731
Mechanized
294398491
Profit/Rai/Month: Manual
1,4101,4801,789
Mechanized
1,5061,6722,029
For 60 cm Trench System:   
Revenue:
1,9802,2952,790
Cost:
   
Fixed2 Manual
400800800–1,2003
Mechanized
208416416–624
Hardware
252542
Variable:
165165189
Total Cost Manual
5909901,231
Mechanized
398606520
Profit/Rai/Month: Manual
1,3901,3051,559
Mechanized
1,5821,6892,270

1 Cost assessments from Annex 25; Revenue assessments from Annex 31.

2 Amortization assumed over two seasons on 12 productive months (6 productive months/season), including construction and support hardware costs.

3 Average of cost range used.

Annex 33
Persons (in addition to Marketing Section) Contacted or Interviewed

NAMEADDRESS
Kamphol AdulavidhyaResearch and Development Institute
Kasetsart University
Bangkok, Thailand
Sathian AekamaiNakornsawan Province
Tawee AimsriBangpakong District, Chacheongsao Province
Bumrung Boonmee14 Village 8, Bangpra Sub-district,
Maung District, Chacheongsao Province
Withaya Chareonphon106 Village 8, Songklong Sub-district,
Bangpakong District, Chacheongsao Province
Jon ChamchanPlanning Department, Bank of Agriculture and Agricultural Cooperatives
Medina DelmendoFAO Regional Office, Pra Atit Road, Bangkok
Vichien Karnchanadacha31/3 Bang-or Sub-district, Bangpoo District,
Chacheongsao Province
Ubonwan KeesiriAgricultural Credit Department, Bangkok Bank Ltd.
Bangkok
Narong Klinsukhum444/3 Village 3, Banpoe Sub-District,
Samutprakarn Province
Suchin Mahasaksiri57 Village 4, Bangsuan Sub-District,
Bangkla District, Chacheongsao Province
Sa-ngar MeknavinThai Prawn Farm & Hatchery Co.
c/o Nana Hotel, Sukhumvit Soi 4, Bangkok
Piamsak MenasvetaDepartment of Marine Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok
Manoo OrdeedolchestThai Prawn, 1931–1937 Petchburi Ext. Road,
Bangkok
Adison PakwipartChiangmai Chalermpanpanit Co. Ltd.,
Chiangmai Province
Theodore PanayotouAgricultural Economics Department,
Kasetsart University, Bangkok
Orasa PetcharoenBangplee Fish Pond, K.M. 26, 56/1 Village 7,
Bangsaothong, Sub-District, Bangplee District,
Samutprakarn Province
Peng PhamtrachaiThai Prawn Farm & Hatchery Co.,
c/o Nana Hotel, Sukhumvit Soi 4, Bangkok
Chetta PhanpakdeeFarm Phandee, Ban-Poe District,
Chacheongsao Province
Thammachart Phoonpert118 Wangyao Sub-District, Sriprachan District, Suphanburi Province
Pornchai Pookanapart128 Village 5, Wangyao Sub-District,
Sripachan District, Suphanburi Province
Sotae Sae Tiew14 Village 4, Sa-med Naue Sub-District,
Bangkla District, Chacheongsao Province
Somsak Soonthornanutakul260/3 Village 2, Bangpra Sub-District,
Sriracha District, Cholburi Province
Tamrongtanyarak Co. Ltd.Chacheongsao Province
Yortchai Tansutapanit11 Village 1, Nongboua Sub-District,
Banpoe District, Chacheongsao Province
Adthawan Thengsanit 
Sumrit TiandumAgricultural Policy and Planning Division,
Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives,
Bangkok
Chan Urthian14 Village 9, Paknum Sub-District, Bangkla District, Chacheongsao Province
Vanich VarikulNational Inland Fisheries Institute,
Bangkok
Supree WanapunThai Farmers Bank, Bangkok
Prasert Woralertpicharn337 Village 1, Bangpra Sub-District,
Sriracha District, Bangkok
Back Cover

Previous Page Top of Page