Previous PageTable of Contents目  录Next Page

Organizational Performance

15.     While the Programme Implementation Report draws information from the unaudited FAO financial accounts and the underlying accounting records, it is not intended to be an accounting document. Rather, the PIR includes a discussion of the sources and uses of resources during the biennium in relation to the delivery of products or services and achievement of outcomes. This section summarises the evolution of available resources, the cost of the field programme, and budgetary performance in general. In addition, there is continued reporting on the FAO language policy and the geographical distribution of FAO staff.

Evolution of total resources
16.     Expenditure in 2004-05, as reported in the financial accounts for 2004-05 by source of funds, is presented in Table 1 under the two accounting categories of “General and Related Funds” and “Trust Funds and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)”:

  • General and Related Funds encompass activities funded from the Regular Programme appropriation and associated sources, including jointly financed investment activities, support costs and other assorted items;
  • Trust Funds and UNDP comprise activities funded from all other extrabudgetary resources.


Table 1: Expenditure Summary by Source of Funds (US$ million)

Funding source 2002-03 2004-05  
General and Related Funds      
Regular Programme appropriation (versus 2004-05 budget of US$749.1 million) 651.1  748.2   
Jointly financed investment activities 29.4  26.7   
Support cost reimbursements (Trust Fund/UNDP) 32.6  41.5   
TCP adjustments (Table below) 15.7  25.6   
Currency variance 34.8  18.7   
Expenditure funded from Arrears (Resolution 6/2001) 3.5  31.3   
Other* 12.8  16.3   
Subtotal 779.9  908.3   
Trust Funds and UNDP      
Trust Funds (excluding emergency projects) 284.3  380.0   
Special relief operations (emergency projects) 309.7  239.5   
UNDP 26.0  15.3   
Subtotal 620.0  634.8   
Total expenditures 1,399.9  1,543.1   
*Includes items such as the financial services provided to WFP, the expenditure of the Information Products Revolving Fund and government cash counterpart contributions to country offices.


17.     Total expenditure in 2004-05 was US$ 1,543 million, US$ 143 million (10.2%) higher than 2002-03.

18.     Expenditure under General and Related Funds, which increased by US$ 128 million (16.5%) over the previous biennium, showed significant changes between 2004-05 and 2002-03:

  • the Regular Programme appropriation, while declining in real terms, had a 15% higher expenditure in 2004-05;
  • jointly funded investment activities declined by US$ 2.8 million (9%) in 2004-05 compared to an increase of US$ 6.5 million (22%) in 2002-03;
  • support cost reimbursements rose substantially, increasing by US$ 8.9 million (27%);
  • the line entitled "TCP adjustments" includes the 2004-05 expenditure against the 2002-03 Technical Cooperation Programme (TCP) appropriation and the unspent TCP appropriation from 2004-05 deferred for expenditure in 2006-07. As shown in Table 2, there was a lower level of expenditure against the previous biennium TCP appropriation and a lower level of deferred TCP resources in 2004-05 than in 2002-03.
  • the staff cost variance, which was US$ 5.4 million favourable in 2002-03 deteriorated to US$ 16 million unfavourable in 2004-05;
  • the expenditure of US$ 31.3 million against arrears, relates to one-time expenditures approved by Conference Resolution 6/2001;
  • the increase in expenditure under "Other" resulted from an increase in other sundry income as its components (financial services to WFP, the information products revolving fund and government cash counterpart contributions to country offices) declined in 2004-05.


Table 2: TCP Expenditure Adjustments (US$ million)

Funding source 2002-03 2004-05 Change  
Expenditure against previous biennium's TCP appropriation 77.7  62.0  (15.7)  
Current biennium's appropriation deferred until subsequent biennium (62.0) (36.4) 25.6   
Total 15.7  25.6  9.9   


19.     Under Trust Funds and UNDP, where overall expenditure increased by US$ 14 million (2.4%), there were also significant variations between the two biennia:

  • expenditure on non-emergency trust funds increased by US$ 95.7 million (34%);
  • emergency operations implementation declined by US$ 70.2 million (23%), mainly as the result of termination the Iraq Oil-for-Food Programme; and
  • expenditure under UNDP dropped by US$ 10.7 million (41%).


20.     With reference to the expenditure against arrears mentioned above, in late 2002 the Organization received from the major contributor a payment of arrears in the amount of US$ 100 million, the use of which was stipulated in Conference Resolution 6/2001. A description of the procedural and financial utilisation of these resources during the period 2003-2005 is discussed later in this section. Information on the substantive achievements resulting from utilisation of the arrears resources is included in the programme narratives in the next section on Summary of Programme Implementation and in Annex IV.

21.     The following discussion concentrates on the resources and expenditure concerned with general and related funds comprising the programme of work. Activities linked to the field programme are discussed later in this section and under relevant areas of the Summary of Programme Implementation, particularly the Major Programmes 3.2: Support to Investment and 3.3 Field Operations.

22.     The 2004-05 programme of work included the projected availability of resources from other income, which comprises voluntary contributions that are largely at the disposal of the Organization and managed closely with the Regular Budget appropriation. The inclusion of other income in the programme of work provides a more complete picture of the resources associated with the work being undertaken. However, changes in income versus the budgeted levels during programme implementation require corresponding changes in expenditures in order to conform to the approved budgetary appropriation, adding some uncertainty and complexity to the financial management of the budgetary appropriation.

23.     The 2004-05 programme of work and the adjustments made during its implementation are shown in Table 3 entitled Programme of Work and Budgetary Transfers, 2004-05. Resources originally planned in the PWB 2004-05 totalled US$ 823.3 million, US$ 749.1 from the Regular Programme appropriation and US$ 74.2 million from other income. Adjustments are necessary because the implementation of the programme of work inevitably diverges from that planned as the result of factors such as unforeseen and unbudgeted inflation and other costs as well as shifts in priorities reflecting the changing external environment and the Organization’s efforts to respond to Members' most pressing needs.

24.     The financial regulations of the Organization require that all transfers of the Regular Programme appropriation between chapters of the PWB have prior approval of the Finance Committee. Accordingly, at its session in September 2005, the Finance Committee approved transfers between budgetary chapters of up to US$ 6 million from Chapter 1: General Policy and Direction, Chapter 2: Technical and Economic Programmes and Chapter 5: Support Services in favour of Chapters 3: Cooperation and Partnerships (US$ 4.2 million) and Chapter 6: Common Services (US$ 1.8 million). The final transfers required were US$ 300,000 from Chapter 1, US$ 2,540,000 from Chapter 2 and US$ 50,000 from Chapter 5 in favour of Chapter 3 (US$1,540,000) and Chapter 6 (US$ 1,350,000). All transfers were within the levels previously approved by the Finance Committee. Overall, the final programme of work reflected an increase of US$ 7.3 million as the result of higher than planned income received during 2004-05.

25.     Shifts between major programmes were largely due to the following factors:

  • unfavourable staff cost variance, related to the strengthening of local currencies against the US dollar in decentralized offices, significant adjustments to the provisions for staff related liabilities following a new actuarial valuation and an increase in premiums of staff medical schemes;
  • additional security requirements in the regional and subregional offices related to Minimum Operating Security Standards (MOSS);
  • higher than anticipated headquarters building and maintenance expenditures.


26.     FAO took decisive action during the biennium to ensure a safe and secure working environment for staff at all locations. Security expenditures totalled about US$ 19 million, more than double that of the previous biennium. The main actions taken in the field and at headquarters are reported in Summary of Programme Implementation under Programme 1.3.1, Major Programme 3.4, and Chapter 6.

27.     Security budgets and expenditures in 2004-05 are spread among several chapters and organizational units, which weaken the financial management and control of this important area of expenditure. To strengthen the existing financial framework for planning, monitoring and accountability for security of staff and assets of the Organization, the Conference in November 2005 approved the Director-General’s proposal to establish a Security Expenditure Facility consisting of a separate budgetary chapter and a Security Account. Therefore, future PIRs will report on security expenditure and related activities in a unified manner.

28.     Expenditures to implement the programme of work versus the 2004-05 final budget are shown in Table 4 entitled Budgetary Performance, 2004-05. Expenditure totalled US$ 829.8 million1 against a corresponding final budget of US$ 830.6 million. Income earned was US$ 81.5 million. Overall net expenditure against the Regular Programme appropriation of US$ 749.1 million was US$ 748.2 million.

29.     The underlying causes requiring budgetary transfers between programmes are often beyond the control of the allottee and depend, for example, on income shortfalls, exchange rate variance on non-staff costs, decisions of the International Civil Service Commission (ICSC) on staff costs, and so on. Therefore, in the summary tables preceding each programme in the Summary of Programme Implementation section of the PIR, information is provided on expenditure against the final programme of work after budgetary transfers. A percentage of PWB resources subject to transfers is also given as a measure of the extent to which the actual programmes implemented departed, in financial terms, from those originally planned.

30.     During the 2004-05 biennium, the unfavourable variance between actual and standard staff cost rates totalled nearly US$ 16 million and was, therefore, a significant factor in overall budgetary performance. The effect of staff cost variance by major programme has been included in Table 4.

Table 3: Programme of Work and Budgetary Transfers, 2004-05 (US$ '000)

    2004-05 Programme of Work 2004-05 Income 2004-05 Net Appropriation/Income
CH/ MP Description Programme of Work Adjustments Arising out of Budgetary Transfers Final Programme of Work Income Income Adjustments Final Income Net Appropriation Approved Transfers Final Appropriation
11 Governing Bodies 19,598 775 20,373 0 (85) (85) 19,598 690 20,288
12 Policy, Direction and Planning 28,236 1,710 29,946 (2,100) (170) (2,270) 26,136 1,540 27,676
13 External Coordination and Liaison 21,621 (2,280) 19,341 0 (250) (250) 21,621 (2,530) 19,091
1 General Policy and Direction 69,455 205 69,660 (2,100) (505) (2,605) 67,355 (300) 67,055
21 Agricultural Production and Support Systems 102,927 890 103,817 (2,980) (2,140) (5,120) 99,947 (1,250) 98,697
22 Food and Agriculture Policy and Development 100,547 (570) 99,977 (2,278) (1,180) (3,458) 98,269 (1,750) 96,519
23 Fisheries 47,222 75 47,297 (2,173) 800 (1,373) 45,049 875 45,924
24 Forestry 35,374 775 36,149 (697) (685) (1,382) 34,677 90 34,767
25 Contributions to Sustainable Development and Special Programme Thrusts 52,640 (280) 52,360 (1,447) (225) (1,672) 51,193 (505) 50,688
2 Technical and Economic Programmes 338,710 890 339,600 (9,575) (3,430) (13,005) 329,135 (2,540) 326,595
31 Policy Assistance 29,653 410 30,063 (861) (230) (1,091) 28,792 180 28,972
32 Support to Investment 55,128 (3,075) 52,053 (29,654) 1,500 (28,154) 25,474 (1,575) 23,899
33 Field Operations 12,313 (310) 12,003 (8,206) 395 (7,811) 4,107 85 4,192
34 FAO Representatives 81,747 4,375 86,122 (11,332) (1,910) (13,242) 70,415 2,465 72,880
35 Cooperation with External Partners 11,790 480 12,270 (1,945) (230) (2,175) 9,845 250 10,095
39 Programme Management 2,288 150 2,438 (147) (15) (162) 2,141 135 2,276
3 Cooperation and Partnerships 192,919 2,030 194,949 (52,145) (490) (52,635) 140,774 1,540 142,314
41 Technical Cooperation Programme 98,645 0 98,645 0 0 0 98,645 0 98,645
42 TCP Unit 4,382 0 4,382 0 0 0 4,382 0 4,382
4 Technical Cooperation Programme 103,027 0 103,027 0 0 0 103,027 0 103,027
51 Information and Publications Support 18,064 297 18,361 0 (60) (60) 18,064 237 18,301
52 Administration 48,074 885 48,959 (6,723) (1,172) (7,895) 41,351 (287) 41,064
5 Support Services 66,138 1,182 67,320 (6,723) (1,232) (7,955) 59,415 (50) 59,365
60 Common Services 52,486 2,985 55,471 (3,692) (1,635) (5,327) 48,794 1,350 50,144
6 Common Services 52,486 2,985 55,471 (3,692) (1,635) (5,327) 48,794 1,350 50,144
70 Contingencies 600 0 600 0 0 0 600 0 600
7 Contingencies 600 0 600 0 0 0 600 0 600
  TOTAL 823,335 7,292 830,627 (74,235) (7,292) (81,527) 749,100 0 749,100


Table 4: Budgetary Performance, 2004-05 (US$ '000)

    2004-05 Final Budget 2004-05 Expenditure Variance: Budget less Expenditure/Income
CH/ MP Description Programme of Work Income Appropriation Budget Rate Expenditure before Staff cost Variance Staff Cost Variance Budget Rate Expenditure Income Net Expenditure Programme of Work (Over)/ Under Income Over/ (Under) Net Appropriation (Over)/ Under
11 Governing Bodies 20,373 (85) 20,288 20,192 164 20,356 (85) 20,271 17 0 17
12 Policy, Direction and Planning 29,946 (2,270) 27,676 29,141 782 29,923 (2,268) 27,655 23 2 21
13 External Coordination and Liaison 19,341 (250) 19,091 19,027 274 19,301 (247) 19,054 40 3 37
1 General Policy and Direction 69,660 (2,605) 67,055 68,360 1,220 69,580 (2,600) 66,980 80 5 75
21 Agricultural Production and Support Systems 103,817 (5,120) 98,697 101,155 2,610 103,765 (5,117) 98,648 52 3 49
22 Food and Agriculture Policy and Development 99,977 (3,458) 96,519 97,733 2,195 99,928 (3,452) 96,476 49 6 43
23 Fisheries 47,297 (1,373) 45,924 46,187 1,076 47,263 (1,367) 45,896 34 6 28
24 Forestry 36,149 (1,382) 34,767 35,156 961 36,117 (1,377) 34,740 32 5 27
25 Contributions to Sustainable Development and Special Programme Thrusts 52,360 (1,672) 50,688 51,127 1,190 52,317 (1,661) 50,656 43 11 32
2 Technical and Economic Programmes 339,600 (13,005) 326,595 331,358 8,032 339,390 (12,974) 326,416 210 31 179
31 Policy Assistance 30,063 (1,091) 28,972 29,090 969 30,059 (1,090) 28,969 4 1 3
32 Support to Investment 52,053 (28,154) 23,899 49,942 2,103 52,045 (28,146) 23,899 8 8 0
33 Field Operations 12,003 (7,811) 4,192 11,629 373 12,002 (7,810) 4,192 1 1 0
34 FAO Representatives 86,122 (13,242) 72,880 84,566 1,553 86,119 (13,242) 72,877 3 0 3
35 Cooperation with External Partners 12,270 (2,175) 10,095 11,923 348 12,271 (2,176) 10,095 (1) (1) 0
39 Programme Management 2,438 (162) 2,276 2,402 31 2,433 (161) 2,272 5 1 4
3 Cooperation and Partnerships 194,949 (52,635) 142,314 189,552 5,377 194,929 (52,625) 142,304 20 10 10
41 Technical Cooperation Programme 98,645 0 98,645 98,771 0 98,771 (52) 98,719 (126) (52) (74)
42 TCP Unit 4,382 0 4,382 4,188 120 4,308 0 4,308 74 0 74
4 Technical Cooperation Programme 103,027 0 103,027 102,959 120 103,079 (52) 103,027 (52) (52) 0
51 Information and Publications Support 18,361 (60) 18,301 17,937 419 18,356 (61) 18,295 5 (1) 6
52 Administration 48,959 (7,895) 41,064 48,217 739 48,956 (7,895) 41,061 3 0 3
5 Support Services 67,320 (7,955) 59,365 66,154 1,158 67,312 (7,956) 59,356 8 (1) 9
60 Common Services 55,471 (5,327) 50,144 55,402 55 55,457 (5,320) 50,137 14 7 7
6 Common Services 55,471 (5,327) 50,144 55,402 55 55,457 (5,320) 50,137 14 7 7
70 Contingencies 600 0 600 14 0 14 0 14 586 0 586
7 Contingencies 600 0 600 14 0 14 0 14 586 0 586
  TOTAL 830,627 (81,527) 749,100 813,799 15,962 829,761 (81,527) 748,234 866 0 866


31.     The total expenditure by PWB chapter is summarised in Figure 2.1. The technical work of the Organization accounted for 77% of expenditure in 2004-05, slightly lower than 2002-03, distributed as follows:

  • 41% under Chapter 2: Technical and Economic Programmes;
  • 24% under Chapter 3: Cooperation and Partnerships; and
  • 12% under Chapter 4: Technical Cooperation Programme.


32.     Chapter 1: General Policy and Direction, including the costs of governance and public information (Major Programme 5.1), amounted to a further 11%, leaving a balance of 12% for Major Programme 5.2 Administration and Chapter 6: Common Services.



33.     The share of expenditure between headquarters and decentralized offices is shown in Figure 2.2. Headquarters accounted for 65% of total expenditures in 2004-05, up from 62% in 2002-03. Field programme expenditures funded from the Regular Programme for TCP and SPFS decreased slightly from 14% in 2002-03 to 13% in 2004-05 and regional offices decreased from 10% to 8%. FAORs remained at 10%, subregional offices at 3% and liaison offices at 1%. As these figures show, headquarters remains the dominant origin of expenditures for the Organization, despite the extensive decentralization that has taken place since 1994.



34.     A breakdown of expenditure in relation to the final programme of work for Chapter 2: Technical and Economic Programmes is shown in Table 5. The chapter fully utilised the Regular Programme resources available during 2004-05, with expenditure within the chapter (US$ 339.4 million) nearly US$ 0.7 million higher than originally planned (US$ 338.7 million), following the overall chapter transfers authorised by the Finance Committee. Those areas receiving substantial additional Regular Programme resources, compared with the original biennial budgetary plans, included Programme 2.1.2: Crops (US$ 1.1 million); Programme 2.2.3: Food and Agricultural Monitoring, Assessments and Outlooks (US$ 485,000); Programme 2.3.2: Fisheries Resources and Aquaculture (US$ 370,000); Programme 2.4.1: Forest Resources (US$ 375,000); and Programme 2.4.3: Forestry Policy and Institutions (US$ 420,000). Those with significant decreases were Programme 2.1.1: Natural Resources (US$ 600,000); Programme 2.2.2: Food and Agricultural Information (US$ 980,000); Programme 2.3.3: Fisheries Exploitation and Utilization (US$ 325,000); and Programme 2.3.4: Fisheries Policy (US$ 325,000).

Table 5: Budgetary Performance for Chapter 2: Technical and Economic Programmes, 2004-05 (US$ '000)

MP/ PR Description Programme of Work Adjustments to Programme of Work Final Programme of Work Expenditure (Over)/ Under Spending Field Programme
210 Intra-departmental Programme Entities for Agricultural Production and Support Systems 5,395 200 5,595 5,589 6 4,952
211 Natural Resources 17,392 (600) 16,792 16,781 11 81,210
212 Crops 27,745 1,160 28,905 28,894 11 207,363
213 Livestock 18,859 (210) 18,649 18,640 9 66,124
214 Agricultural Support Systems 15,905 (105) 15,800 15,794 6 35,315
215 Agricultural Applications of Isotopes and Biotechnology 5,682 280 5,962 5,956 6 780
219 Programme Management 11,949 165 12,114 12,111 3 0
21 Agricultural Production and Support Systems 102,927 890 103,817 103,765 52 395,744
220 Intra-departmental Programme Entities for Food and Agriculture Policy and Development 6,603 (260) 6,343 6,334 9 6,131
221 Nutrition, Food Quality and Safety 20,626 215 20,841 20,831 10 22,406
222 Food and Agricultural Information 33,917 (980) 32,937 32,924 13 15,549
223 Food and Agricultural Monitoring, Assessments and Outlooks 15,119 485 15,604 15,599 5 3,353
224 Agriculture, Food Security and Trade Policy 13,024 (195) 12,829 12,819 10 17,899
229 Programme Management 11,258 165 11,423 11,421 2 0
22 Food and Agriculture Policy and Development 100,547 (570) 99,977 99,928 49 65,338
231 Fisheries Information 7,573 175 7,748 7,740 8 1,571
232 Fisheries Resources and Aquaculture 12,358 370 12,728 12,718 10 14,305
233 Fisheries Exploitation and Utilisation 9,882 (325) 9,557 9,550 7 21,344
234 Fisheries Policy 11,406 (325) 11,081 11,074 7 23,984
239 Programme Management 6,003 180 6,183 6,181 2 0
23 Fisheries 47,222 75 47,297 47,263 34 61,204
241 Forest Resources 9,131 375 9,506 9,497 9 25,006
242 Forest Products and Economics 9,193 (35) 9,158 9,157 1 2,977
243 Forestry Policy and Institutions 5,788 420 6,208 6,202 6 13,933
244 Forestry Information and Liaison 5,457 25 5,482 5,474 8 4,162
249 Programme Management 5,805 (10) 5,795 5,787 8 0
24 Forestry 35,374 775 36,149 36,117 32 46,078
251 Research, Natural Resources Management and Technology Transfer 17,853 70 17,923 17,919 4 21,212
252 Gender and Population 6,058 (250) 5,808 5,794 14 13,841
253 Rural Development 8,580 75 8,655 8,647 8 23,220
256 Food Production in Support of Food Security in LIFDCs 11,644 (210) 11,434 11,425 9 52,988
259 Programme Management 8,505 35 8,540 8,532 8 0
25 Contributions to Sustainable Development and Special Programme Thrusts 52,640 (280) 52,360 52,317 43 111,261
  TOTAL 338,710 890 339,600 339,390 210 679,625


35.     The final column of Table 5 shows expenditure under the field programme, which comprises all technical assistance and emergency assistance activities funded through extrabudgetary sources, and Regular Programme-funded technical assistance and emergency projects under the TCP and SPFS. Attention is drawn to the distinction between extrabudgetary resources, which refer to all non-Regular Programme sources of funds and related expenditures in the financial accounts of the Organization, and the field programme, which refers to the expenditure relating directly to FAO's implementation of technical and emergency assistance projects. In this context, the World Health Organization (WHO) share of the Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme (Codex Alimentarius) is part of extrabudgetary resources, but is not part of the field programme. Conversely, the TCP and the provision for the SPFS are funded from the Regular Programme, but are included as part of the field programme.

36.     The ratios of 2004-05 expenditure of the field programme and the Regular Programme-funded programme of work for Chapter 2 are shown in Table 6. Field programme expenditures were twice those of the programme of work. However, there were significant differences between the major programmes. Major Programme 2.1: Agricultural Production and Support Systems accounted for 58% of total field programme expenditures in 2004-05 and had the highest ratio, with field programme expenditure 3.8 times that of the programme of work. Major Programme 2.5 Contributions to Sustainable Development and Special Programme Thrusts also had a relatively high ratio of 2.4, mainly due to greater emphasis being placed on project execution within the SPFS, rather than the programme providing a source of field programme funding. In this regard, SPFS resources within the field programme declined from US$ 8.8 million in 2002-03 to US$ 5.4 million in 2004-05. Programme 2.3: Fisheries and 2.4: Forestry, both had a ratio of 1.3. For Fisheries this was a major increase, mainly related to the field programme assistance provided for Tsunami relief and rehabilitation. Major Programme 2.2: Food and Agriculture Policy and Development was the only one in which field programme expenditures were less than the regular programme expenditure, being only about 70% that of the programme of work.

Table 6: Ratio of Field Programme and Programme of Work Expenditures under Chapter 2: Technical and Economic Programmes, 2004-05

Major Programme RP* programme of work US$ '000 Field programme US$ '000 Ratio of field to programme of work
2.1 Agricultural Production and Support Systems 103,764 395,744 3.8 
2.2 Food and Agriculture Policy and Development 99,929 65,338 0.7 
2.3 Fisheries 47,263 61,204 1.3 
2.4 Forestry 36,117 46,078 1.3 
2.5 Contributions to Sustainable Development and Special Programme Thrusts* 46,881 111,261 2.4 
Total 333,955 679,625 2.0 
* To avoid distorting the ratio, the Regular Programme funded programme of work for Chapter 2 comprises all Regular Programme expenditure excluding SPFS project delivery, which amounted to US$ 5.4 million in 2004-05. SPFS delivery is included under the column headed Field programme.


Split Assessments
37.     The FAO Conference, at its 32nd session in 2003, adopted Resolution 11/2003 to amend Regulation V of the Financial Regulations to reflect introduction of the Split Assessment methodology for the Regular Programme commencing on 1 January 2004. The methodology involves the splitting of Regular Programme assessments between euro and the US dollar as a means of protecting the implementation of the programme of work from exchange rate fluctuations.

38.     The Conference established the 2004-05 Regular Programme appropriation at US$ 749.1 million based on an exchange rate of € 1= US$ 1.19. The proportion of the appropriation to be paid was set at 45% in US dollars and 55% in euros. After adjustments for the Miscellaneous Income, funding for the After-service Medical Coverage liability and tax equalization, the biennial assessed contributions amounted to US$ 341.6 million (payable in US dollars) and € 348.9 million (payable in euros).

39.     The Conference at its 33rd session in November 20052 reviewed a report prepared at its request on the performance of the split assessment arrangement during the 2004-05 biennium. It agreed to exclude charges to the Special Reserve Account due to variances in headquarters staff costs arising from differences between the budget rate and UN operational rates of exchange, with effect from the 2004-05 biennium.

40.     The experience in 2004-05 with processing call letters, statements and receipts in two currencies and in responding to Members' queries and requests for information indicates that Member Nations have adapted to the split assessment approach relatively easily. Most countries tended to pay both the dollar and euro assessments at the same time, although some Members were irregular with their payments, in contrast to others who were more consistent in payments during the same period each year. The high irregularity of receipt of payments continued to make it difficult for the Organization to accurately forecast its cash flow.

41.     An analysis of actual expenditures during the 2004-05 biennium indicated that the proportional expenditure by currency was very close to the projected split, with a slightly higher US dollar proportion (46%) and lower euro proportion (54%) than the proportions approved for the 2004-05 PWB.

42.     Overall, the experience in application of split assessments during 2004-05 was positive. Members seemed to adapt to the new arrangements relatively easily, but delays in the receipt of Members' contributions has caused exchange losses during the biennium, which could be largely eliminated through timely payment of assessments.

Cost of Field Programme Support

45.     The provision of technical assistance is an important part of the Organization's mandate, specified under Article I 3 (a) of the Constitution, which states: "It shall also be the function of the Organization to furnish such technical assistance as governments request". Technical assistance is provided from the Regular Programme – as for TCP and SPFS – or from extrabudgetary sources under the GCP, UTFs, UNDP3 or other arrangements for voluntary contributions to the field programme.

46.     The Organization makes a further significant contribution to technical assistance through its support to the field programme in the form of technical support services (TSS) and administrative and operational support (AOS) services.

47.     Since 1992, the Organization has made concerted efforts to measure and transparently report the cost of supporting the field programme under these two headings. This is achieved through the Work Measurement Survey which involves the completion of a detailed questionnaire by close to 1,000 staff each year. This data has been used in a number of valuable ways:

  • in the case of TSS to provide an estimate of the extent of staff time and cost dedicated to the provision of these services; and
  • in the case of AOS to provide a proper basis for the establishment of project servicing cost (PSC) rates as well as to help direct actions aimed at reducing such costs.


48.     FAO's field programme delivery reached US$ 723 million in 2004-05, as reported under Major Programme 3.1 and Table 3.3.1 in the Summary of Programme of Implementation section. The proportion of trust fund projects remained stable at 82%, while TCP projects rose from 15% to 16% and UNDP projects further declined to 2% of delivery. In reporting on the cost of field programme support below, total delivery is US$ 24.8 million higher than field programme delivery reported in Table 3.3.1, due to the inclusion of delivery on emergency, normative and technical assistance projects that do not directly contribute to activities in the field but attract TSS and AOS services.

Technical support services (TSS)
49.     These are defined as:

  • project identification;
  • design and formulation of projects;
  • project appraisal services;
  • technical backstopping at headquarters, regional offices or in the field, including attendance at project meetings and tripartite reviews; and
  • project evaluation services.


50.     The overall level of TSS is outlined in Table 7, which compares the 2004-05 result with the previous biennium. It should be noted that more detailed information on TSS is included in the programme tables later in the document under Summary of Programme Implementation.

Table 7: Technical Support Services

Component 2002-03 2004-05
  US$ million* Percentage of total delivery** US$ million Percentage of total delivery
Delivery 725.6   747.9  
Project design and formulation 12.8 1.8% 16.1 2.1%
Project appraisal 7.1 1.0% 9.9 1.3%
Project monitoring 18.8 2.6% 26.2 3.5%
Project evaluation and audit 5.2 0.7% 6.9 0.9%
Project reporting 5.1 0.7% 7.6 1.0%
Project meetings 8.6 1.2% 9.9 1.3%
Total TSS 57.6 8.0% 76.6 10.1%
* The figures include the impact of staff cost variance so as to reflect actual costs at budget rate of exchange between euro and US$
** Percentage of total delivery was recalculated as delivery including TSS


51.     Total field programme delivery in 2004-05 increased by 3.1% from 2002-03, while the cost of technical support services increased sharply by US$ 19 million to US$ 76.6 million. As a result, TSS as a percentage of total delivery increased from 8.1% in 2002-03 to 10.2% in 2004-05. The composition in the percentage of total delivery for the TSS components increased proportionately from the level in 2002-03.

52.     As a major portion of TSS is in the form of staff time, Table 8 shows the percentage of the cost of professional technical staff time dedicated to these purposes. Since average TSS remained around the same level (29%) as in the previous biennium, the increase in TSS cost can be attributed to the higher staff cost in 2004-05 combined with a higher effort for TCP projects and major emergencies (avian influenza, locusts, Tsunami.

53.     Table 7 shows that TSS, largely in the form of staff time, costing US$ 76.6 million, were provided to projects during 2004-05. The reimbursement for this technical assistance totalled US$ 19.9 million, provided by extrabudgetary-funded projects (US$ 7.2 million), TCP and SPFS projects (US$ 12.7 million). The balance for TSS was incurred under the Regular Programme budget for technical divisions. Reimbursements from extrabudgetary projects increased by nearly 85% compared with the previous biennium, which is in line with efforts to budget for TSS in such projects. Funding from TCP projects rose significantly, by 21%, consistent with the increase in TCP delivery and reflecting the impact of improved monitoring of projects and the simplification in the reimbursement modality that encouraged technical divisions to more systematically claim reimbursement for the services provided.

Table 8: Proportion of Professional Staff Time Devoted to TSS to the Field Programme, 2004-05

MP/PR Description Headquarters Regional Offices Subregional Offices Total
2.1.0 Intra-departmental Programme Entities for Agricultural Production and Support Systems 19 58 34 21
2.1.1 Natural Resources 33 54 54 40
2.1.2 Crops 30 48 40 34
2.1.3 Livestock 30 54 45 34
2.1.4 Agricultural Support Systems 35 57 41 41
2.1.5 Agricultural Applications of Isotopes and Biotechnology 27 0 0 27
2.1 Agricultural Production and Support Systems 31 53 44 36
2.2.0 Intra-departmental Programme Entities for Food and Agriculture Policy and Development 21 41 56 26
2.2.1 Nutrition, Food Quality and Safety 15 60 49 21
2.2.2 Food and Agricultural Information 10 40 56 13
2.2.3 Food and Agricultural Monitoring, Assessments and Outlooks 7 50 0 8
2.2.4 Agriculture, Food Security and Trade Policy 17 35 60 19
2.2 Food and Agriculture Policy and Development 12 45 53 16
2.3.1 Fisheries Information 5 42 38 9
2.3.2 Fisheries Resources and Aquaculture 28 46 34 29
2.3.3 Fisheries Exploitation and Utilization 27 36 37 28
2.3.4 Fisheries Policy 21 39 35 25
2.3 Fisheries 21 41 36 24
2.4.1 Forest Resources 33 47 32 35
2.4.2 Forest Products and Economics 13 47 35 17
2.4.3 Forestry Policy and Institutions 34 46 33 37
2.4.4 Forestry Information and Liaison 6 45 35 11
2.4 Forestry 23 46 34 27
2.5.1 Research, Natural Resources Management and Technology Transfer 29 46 54 33
2.5.2 Gender and Population 32 45 65 36
2.5.3 Rural Development 36 62 48 41
2.5.6 Food Production in Support of Food Security in LIFDCs 55 0 0 55
2.5 Contributions to Sustainable Development and Special Programme Thrusts 35 50 51 38
3.1 Policy Assistance 34 53 46 44
  Average 24 50 44 29


54.     The decentralization of primary responsibility for TSS to the regional and subregional offices and the increased emphasis on the field programme is evident from Table 8 and Figure 2.3. In the regional offices the time spent by professional technical staff on TSS to the field programme stood at 50% while the decline in subregional offices was offset by an increase in AOS. At headquarters TSS remained at 24% in 2004-05.



55.     As shown in Figure 2.4, total field programme support exceeded 33% of staff time in all decentralized offices. Time spent by technical staff on TSS to the field programme varied between decentralized by region locations from 45% in the Near East region to 51% in Latin America and the Caribbean.



Administrative and operational support (AOS) services
56.     AOS consist of variable indirect costs that can be associated with the delivery of direct project inputs. They include:

  • assembling proposals for donors and negotiating agreements and plans of operation with stakeholders;
  • recruitment, briefing and servicing of project personnel;
  • fellowships placement and servicing and formulation of study plans;
  • selecting and procuring supplies and equipment;
  • preparation and formalisation of contracts;
  • preparation, monitoring and revision of budgets and control of project expenditures;
  • receipt, custody and disbursement of funds;
  • maintenance of project accounts, financial reporting and support to external and internal audits;
  • location and recommendation of qualified personnel;
  • coordination and supervision of project implementation.


57.     The level of these costs over the last two biennia is shown in Table 9.

58.     In the 2004-05 biennium, total AOS costs (incurred in TCE) have risen by US$ 34 million or, as a percentage of total project delivery, from 10% to 14.1%. Key factors in the rise in AOS costs are the higher share of TCP projects in total delivery (given the small size and relative complexity of TCP projects), the general increase in staff costs, an improved recognition of the work effort in country offices, and the changing nature of emergency assistance projects.

59.     Table 9 shows direct operating costs on emergency assistance as a percentage of emergency project delivery increasing sharply from 2.4% to 6.5%. This is attributable to the proportional decline of the relatively lower-cost Iraq Oil-for-Food projects, which had a particular administrative and operational set up and fell from 64% of emergency delivery in 2002-03 to none in 2004-05, as operations closed in 2003. Although emergency project delivery decreased by some 27%, it still remained at high levels due to the increase in the number of emergency assistance projects, as further reported under Major Programme 3.3. The greater diversity of emergency operations undertaken during the biennium entailed proportionally higher support costs. This has been recognized by the Council in November 2005, which approved a change in the project support cost principle and reimbursement rate for emergency assistance projects.

Table 9: Administrative and Operational Support Costs

Component 2002-03 2003-04
  US$ million* Percentage of component delivery** US$ million Percentage of component delivery
Project personnel 16.6 0.8% 22.2 0.8%
Project procurement 7.7 14.7% 10.6 12.7%
Project subcontracts 3.4 6.2% 3.8 5.2%
Project training 3.6 13.7% 4.5 16.9%
Project non-technical monitoring 16.4 4.4% 23.9 4.8%
Project budgeting and accounting 7.3 1.9% 11.2 2.2%
Project budget holder responsibilities 5.5 1.5% 7.5 1.5%
Project secretarial 3.0 0.8% 5.8 1.1%
Emergency Operating Costs (incurred in TCE) 8.1 2.4% 16.1 6.5%
Total AOS 71.6 10.0% 105.5 14.1%
* The figures include the impact of staff cost variance so as to reflect actual costs at budget rate of exchange between euro and US$. Costs have been restated to include Incremental Indirect costs
** Percentage of component delivery was recalculated as delivery including TSS


60.     AOS cost is partially covered by reimbursements from the projects through charges for PSC. Table 10 shows the extent of reimbursements for AOS services in total including from emergency projects and TCP/SPFS projects funded from the Regular Programme.

Table 10: Administrative and Operational Support Costs and Extent of Reimbursement Received from Field Programme

US$ million 2002-03 2004-05 Variance
Administrative and operational support costs 71.6 105.5 33.9
Reimbursements 47.3 78.4 31.1
Under-recovery of support costs (24.3) (27.1) (2.8)
Net percentage of cost recovered 66.0% 74.3%  


61.     Total AOS costs increased by nearly US$ 34 million to US$ 105.5 million in 2004-05, while reimbursements received in the biennium increased by US$ 31 million to reach the unprecedented level of US$ 78 million level. On the one hand, recoveries related to TCP projects doubled because of the high levels of delivery, and recoveries from trust fund projects also increased. On the other hand, a distortion is created by the project support cost income credited to the Organization in 2004 for support provided in 2003 during the closure of the Oil-for-Food programme in executing contracts. Thus it is expected that recoveries will be at lower levels in 2006-07.

Efficiency Savings: Progress

63.     Efficiency savings have been defined by the FAO Council as reductions in the costs of inputs without material negative impact upon the outputs. The vigorous pursuit of efficiencies has been under way in FAO since January 1994, and savings over the past five biennia are estimated at US$ 60 million per annum compared with 1994, arising from input-oriented measures (US$ 39 million per annum), process-oriented measures (US$ 19 million per annum) and cost-recovery measures (US$ 4 million per annum).

64.     The Adjustments to the PWB 2004-05 outlined several areas where efficiency savings were expected to be achieved in the biennium, as well as other potential areas for savings under review.

Reduction in the Administrative Unit in the Office of the Director-General (ODGX)
65.     Efficiency savings in the servicing units, MSS, OCDS, Regional MSUs and in parts of AFH and AFF were progressively achieved. The MSS absorbed many of the function of ODGX and, as a result, ODGX was substantially reduced, including abolition of four posts at a saving of US$ 535,000 per biennium.

Incentive-driven chargeback for publications distribution
66.     In June 2005, a new internal charging mechanism was approved for the distribution and storage costs of all FAO publications and meeting documents. Previously, these costs were paid centrally by AFS, whereas from January 2006 the budget for these costs was placed with the internal client divisions which have some influence over the costs through their decisions on the quantity of publications to distribute and store. It is anticipated that savings of US$ 700,000 will eventually be realised as a result of the ensuing behavioural changes.

Streamlining governance
67.     The Organization has benefited from the support of governing bodies in this area and considerable reductions in the costs of running meetings have been achieved with estimated savings of approximately US$ 2 million per annum compared with 1994.

68.     Besides reducing the duration of the Conference from 9 to 7 days, as approved at the 32nd session of the Conference, in 2005 the length of the Committee on Commodity Problems (CCP) and the Committee on Agriculture (COAG) sessions was reduced and costs diminished by scheduling meetings back-to-back.

69.     As reported under Major Programme 1.1, mailings of meetings documents were reduced due to increased downloading of documents from the Web site, and the word limit rule was more strictly applied. Notable improvements were the shorter Summary and Programme of Work and Budget (SPWB and PWB) documents for 2006-07 produced in 2005, as well as this more compact PIR.

70.     In seeking to find innovative ways to generate further savings in governance, the Organization also looked at best practices in other UN agencies. The elimination, or more efficient production of verbatim records, which are expensive to produce, was one area of investigation. Verbatim records are a requirement of FAO’s Basic Texts, therefore, other less costly production methods were considered, such as audio/video recordings of governing body meetings. It was estimated that the implementation of such measures could generate savings of approximately US$ 300,000 per annum. In the meantime, tighter time management enabled the number of seconded staff involved in the production of verbatim records for Conference and Council sessions to be reduced by 30% compared to the previous biennium.

Restructuring of registries
71.     A review of registries commenced in mid-2003 and resulted in significant changes to the methods of work with the introduction of digitization during 2004-05. The FAO records management process was modified to reflect the recommendations of the International Standards Organization (ISO) 15489 standard, which is an essential component of new accountability and quality management standards. In order to gain the full potential of efficiency savings in the registries, the Organization undertook an analysis of possible structural and staffing changes. Net savings of US$ 222,000 per year were realised in the 2004-05. Implementation of the next phase could yield further savings of US$ 260,000 per year in the 2006-07 biennium.

Business process reviews, streamlining and work flow improvements
72.     Since 1994, FAO administrative and financial procedures have undergone extensive review, taking into account relevant findings of the External Auditor and the Inspector-General, resulting in the revision of a large number of procedures, many of which were implemented under the Oracle financial and administrative system. During 2004-05, the Organization reviewed its human resource management processes in connection with the development of the Human Resources Management System (HRMS), which will have Organization-wide implications from 2007. Efficiency savings identified relate to the elimination of time-consuming steps in administrative processes and reduction of paper flows through, for example, on-line initiation of transactions by the requesting users directly in the system.

Ongoing structural changes: information technology
73.     The Organization considered the outsourcing of administrative and information systems development and maintenance work or, alternatively, offshoring them to a lower cost Regional Office location. The latter option was pursued and an Offshore Systems Development and Support Centre (OSDSC) created in Bangkok in 2005 for the HRMS project. Extensions to the ICT services included in this type of offshoring will depend on the results of the Bangkok experience.

74.     The mainframe computer environment was outsourced to the UN International Computing Centre (ICC) in Geneva in January 2004, where FAO’s mainframe systems operated on a dedicated computer at the ICC at a similar cost to in-house arrangements. The FAO systems were subsequently moved to a larger mainframe at the ICC, where resources are shared with applications from other UN agencies. The savings foreseen from 2006 onwards were anticipated to be approximately US$ 60,000 per year.

Joint FAO-IFAD-WFP action - procurement of electricity supply on the liberalised market
75.     A review of the liberalised market of electricity supply, already started in 2003, was finalised in 2005 with signature of a competitive contract. Savings of US$ 183,000 were generated in 2005 and future savings are estimated at US$ 275,000 per year. The market analysis and tender were carried out jointly with IFAD and WFP, thus confirming the opportunity to achieve cost effective results through the common procurement of certain goods and services.

Improved support cost recovery
76.     The performance of the support cost policy was monitored and reported annually to the Finance Committee. A proposal to update the policy for emergency assistance projects was approved by Council so as to fully recover the indirect variable costs of such projects.

FAO Language Policy

77.     In 1999, the 30th FAO Conference reaffirmed "the imperative of ensuring parity and balance in the use of all FAO languages and the need for supervision of the quality of translation and interpretation. In looking forward to further improvements in the future, the Conference agreed to the need for Members to monitor progress closely through periodic follow up and evaluation4".

FAO meetings
78.     The number of sessions5 held in 2004-05 (see Table 11) remained similar to 2002-03 mainly as the result of the numerous unscheduled sessions that took place during the biennium, and a larger proportion of sessions funded by extrabudgetary resources.

Table 11: Sessions Held at Headquarters and in Decentralized Locations

Description 2000-01 2002-03 2004-05  
Sessions approved in PWB 235 232 231  
Cancelled Sessions, Regular Programme 29 6 62  
Unscheduled Sessions, Regular Programme 22 26 27  
Unscheduled Sessions, Trust Funds 71 12 67  
TOTAL 299 264 263  
Headquarters 112 101 115  
Decentralized locations 187 163 148  
TOTAL 299 264 263  
Percentage decentralized meetings 63% 62% 56%  


79.     An indicator of language balance for FAO meetings is the percentage of meetings held in all FAO languages (Figure 2.5). In 2004-05, the percentage of meetings held in five and four languages increased to 17% and 11%, respectively, while the percentage of meetings held in three languages remained constant, and the proportion of monolingual meetings dropped.



80.     Although the number of meetings organised by FAO has diminished over the last two biennia, interpretation services provided to FAO meetings have remained relatively unchanged in 2004-05, as indicated in Figure 2.6 below6. This is related to the fact that the proportion of meetings held in more than three languages has increased.



81.     Regarding translation, the overall total of 23.9 million words were translated in 2004-05 through the translation service, a volume that has been practically constant for the past three biennia. There were increases in translation into Arabic (16%), Chinese (4%) and English (18%), and a decrease in volume for French (7%) and Spanish (4%). As shown in Figure 2.7, the translation of meeting documentation has increased steadily reaching 15.7 million words in 2004-05, compared with 13.8 million in 2002-03 and 11.6 million in 2000-01. During this same period, translation of publications declined from 7.5 million words in 2000-01 to 2.3 million in 2004-05. However, this volume represents official translation undertaken by internal translation services and does not take into account translation of non-official documents outsourced directly by technical services.



Publications
82.     Publication in FAO’s official languages continues to be a major priority for the Organization. All flagship titles were made available in the five languages with language versions of more technical titles being published in languages appropriate to market needs.

83.     There were some small changes in the language distribution of titles published compared with the previous biennium as shown in Figure 2.8. There was an increase in the percentage of titles published in English (46% in 2004-2005 as against 41% in 2002-2003), while titles issued in French, Spanish and Chinese remained relatively constant (at 19, 18 and 14% respectively). The number of titles published in Arabic decreased (7% in 2002-2003 to 4% in 2004-2005); however, a significant number of publications prepared in Arabic under the 2004-05 special allocation will be issued in the early part of the 2006-07 biennium, positively affecting the overall balance.



Electronic material (WAICENT and the FAO Internet site)
84.     The World Agricultural Information Centre (WAICENT) continued to take advantage of new technologies to improve its language coverage. Through document scanning and OCR7 activities, additional content in Arabic and Chinese was added to the Corporate Document Repository (CDR) and the proportion of information disseminated in those languages increased.

85.     A partnership was established between the National Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS) to map the Chinese Agricultural Thesaurus to the Multilingual Thesaurus of Agricultural Terminology (AGROVOC), resulting in increased correspondences between multilingual perspectives and enriching both thesauri in terms of domain and language coverage.

86.     Resources for Web publishing activities within the "programme for improvement of language coverage" declined in 2004-05 and led to some decline in the total number of entries in the News and Events Management System (NEMS), as shown in Table 12. Since not all documents, Web sites, and news and events are reported through the Electronic Information Management System (EIMS) and NEMS, the actual number of items in each language was higher, particularly considering that many sites are managed outside of FAO headquarters.

Table 12: Number of Items by Language on the FAO Web site as Reflected in the Corporate Systems EIMS and NEMS

  English French Spanish Arabic Chinese Total  
2002-03              
EIMS 17,113 6,355 4,934 3,113 2,158 33,673  
NEMS 2,506 1,251 2,343 489 308 6,897  
Total 19,619 7,606 7,277 3,602 2,466 40,570  
2004-05              
EIMS 14,925 7,187 6,311 4,194 2,230 34,847  
NEMS 2,467 1,160 1,295 633 426 5,981  
Total 17,392 8,347 7,606 4,827 2,656 40,828  


Terminology and language support
87.     In 2004-05, the FAOTERM terminology database increased to 70,000 records in English, French and Spanish, some 50,000 records in Arabic and Chinese, and about 10,000 records in Italian (Figure 2.9). Approximately 13,000 new terminology records were added to the database during the biennium. A new interface was developed to facilitate use of FAOTERM and enhance its dissemination and workflow management. This resulted in increased use by FAO staff, other international organizations and the general public (some 300,000 queries were made through the database each month, by an average of 12,000 users).



88.     Regarding translation and language support, computer-assisted translation technologies, in particular translation memories, multilingual document corporate tools and the corresponding adaptation of working methods, enabled the search and retrieval of past translations to improve consistency of FAO’s documentation and expedite delivery of meeting documentation.

Programme for the improvement of language coverage
89.     Since the 2000-01 biennium, programme entity 222P5: Programme for the improvement of language coverage has provided central support for investments having an immediate impact for countries at relatively low cost; creating the infrastructure for permanent capacity in the five official languages; and correcting long-standing deficiencies in language coverage. Expenditures for these purposes totalled about US$ 1.1 million for the biennium and also covered the continuing arrangement for translation of documents into Chinese undertaken in cooperation with CAAS.

90.     Investments having an immediate impact included improved language coverage of FAO’s internal and external Web sites, audio and video productions and important publications, as well as language training. Investments in infrastructure included translation of the Project Cycle Overview Course into French and Spanish for used by decentralized offices in field programme development. Investments to correct long-standing deficiencies mainly concentrated on the translation of 40 additional titles into Arabic, continuing the effort initiated in the previous biennium.

Geographical Representation and Gender Balance of Professional Staff

Geographical representation of professional staff
95.     The principles of geographic representation of Member Nations followed by the Organization were originally established by the 27th Session of the FAO Council in 1957. The FAO Conference, at its Thirty-second Session held in November-December 2003, adopted a revised formula for the calculation of geographic distribution which was based on the formula implemented in the UN Secretariat and several organizations of the UN common system. Under the new methodology 40% of posts are distributed on the basis of membership, 5% on the basis of member country population, and 55% in proportion to the Scale of Assessments. The implementation of the new methodology was effective from 1 January 2004. The application of the new formula resulted in a significant increase in the number of equitably-represented countries.

96.     Summary tables showing the countries that were not within the range of equitable representation under the old formula as at 31 December 2003 (123 of 183 Member Nations) and under the new formula as at 31 December 2005 (59 of 187 Member Nations), are shown in Annex II: Geographical Representation of Professional Staff.

97.     At the end of 2005, there were 11 countries that exceeded the top of their range under the new formula, compared to 77 at the end of 2003 under the old formula; 17 under-represented countries at the end of 2005, compared to 16 at the end of 2003; and 31 non-represented countries at the end of 2005, compared to 30 at the end of 2003. High priority is given to placement of professional staff from non-represented countries and, 6 of the 30 non-represented countries at the end of 2003, were represented at the end of 2005. However, 24 of the non-represented countries at the end of 2003 were also non-represented at the end of 2005. Of the 31 non-represented countries at the end of 2005, 4 were countries that became new Members in November 2003.

Gender balance of professional staff
98.     Increasing the proportion of female staff in the professional category is one of the main human resources policy objectives of the Organization. Efforts during the last five biennia have resulted in the steady increase of women in professional posts at headquarters from 21% at the beginning of 1996 to 32% at the end 2005 and an increase in all locations from 18 to 29% (Figure 2.10). These percentages are based upon the total number of professional staff with fixed-term or continuing contracts at headquarters and other established offices.8 While the percentage of women in professional posts in offices outside of Rome is significantly below headquarters, the rate of increase has been relative high, growing from 8% in 1996 to 16% in 2005.



99.     The number of female and male staff by grade at the end of 2005 is shown in Table 13. Overall women make a half (50%) of the Organization's total staff, comprising 66% of general service staff (G1 - G7), 31% of professional officers (P1 - P5), 32% of other professionals (National Professional Officers and Associate Professional Officers) and 14% of director and higher-level staff (D1 - DDG). Within the director and higher level, about 16% of both ADG and D-2 level staff are women. Within the professional officers the proportion of females varies from nearly 50% of P-2/P-1 officers and 46% of P-3 officers to 19% of P-5 officers. The greater number of women at the P-1 to P-3 grade levels reflects the increasing number of qualified young women in the technical fields of the Organization that allows them to effectively compete for middle- and entry-level professional positions. As older staff retire, it is expected that many of these women will move into the senior officer positions vacated. The basis for improvement in gender balance at higher-grade levels, which should show significant results over the coming years has, therefore, been put in place.

Table 13: Female and Male Staff by Grade

Grade Female Male Total % Female
DDG 0 1 1 0%
ADG 2 10 12 17%
D-2 7 39 46 15%
D-1 17 105 122 14%
DIRECTOR 26 155 181 14%
P-5 62 261 323 19%
P-4 104 320 424 25%
P-3 123 143 266 46%
P-2 58 54 112 52%
P-1 4 5 9 44%
PROFESSIONAL 351 783 1,134 31%
NPO 15 69 84 18%
APO 34 36 70 49%
OTHER PROFESSIONAL 49 105 154 32%
G-7 38 18 56 68%
G-6 171 65 236 72%
G-5 356 77 433 82%
G-4 418 131 549 76%
G-3 211 149 360 59%
G-2 57 170 227 25%
G-1 4 23 27 15%
GENERAL SERVICE 1,255 633 1,888 66%
Total 1,681 1,676 3,357 50%


Arrears

101.     In late 2002, the Organization received from the major contributor a payment in the amount of US$ 100 million against arrears of Assessed Contributions, the Special Reserve Account (SRA) and the Working Capital Fund (WCF). The use of these funds was stipulated in Conference Resolution 6/2001 for defined purposes and expenditure items of a one-time nature.

102.     Resolution 6/2001 authorised expenditures up to US$ 50.7 million under Operative Clause 4, while the resources available were US$ 44.9 million. Hence, it was necessary to realign proposed expenditures to the lower amount9.

103.     Further demands were also placed upon the arrears through the decisions of the Finance Committee and FAO Conference which agreed in principle to the use of arrears for the one-time expenditure in 2002-03 and 2004-05 on field security requirements and to cover one-time redeployment and separation costs associated with the implementation of the 2004-05 budget reduction. However, the Organization was requested to make every effort to absorb these costs within the Regular Programme, and this is what was done.

104.     The eight substantive areas specified in the Resolution 6/2001, Operative Clause 4, and the adjusted level of resources available and final expenditures related to each are shown in Table 14.

Table 14: Arrears Budget and Expenditure (US$ 000)

Item Total Resources 2002-03 Expenditure 2004-05 Expenditure Total Expenditure Variance (Over)/Under)
1 - Biotechnology and Biosecurity 3,360 369 2,995 3,366 (6)
2 - Natural resource assessment and conservation, with particular emphasis on Forestry 3,472 437 3,021 3,451 21
3 - Enhanced Language coverage through translation of reference texts into official languages including Codex Alimentarius 1,775 245 1,545 1,790 (15)
4 - Multilateral trade 2,274 124 2,082 2,206 68
5 - Statistical data - improvements in quality and coverage 1,575 73 1,415 1,488 87
6 - Fisheries and Other Plans of Action 1,918 173 1,792 1,966 (48)
7 - Information Technology (IT) infrastructure to support technical and other work of the Organization 7,664 1,391 6,429 7,820 (156)
8 - Corporate administrative systems 18,803 718 11,991 12,713 6,090
9 - Contingency amount for possible use related to security and redeployment and separation 4,071 0 0 0 4,071
Total 44,912 3,530 31,270 34,800 10,112


105.     Arrears expenditures in all technical areas (Items 1 – 7) were close to the resources available. The only significant under spending as at 31 December 2005 was in the area of corporate administrative systems, particularly concerning the ongoing consolidation of implemented modules of Oracle Financials and development of the replacement payroll and human resources management modules.

106.     As authorised by the Finance Committee at its September 2005 session and approved in the Revised PWB 2006-07, the unused balance of arrears resources under Resolution 6/2001 as at 31 December 2005, amounting to US$ 10.1 million, was transferred to the Capital Expenditure Facility for its effective operation.

107.     Information on selected arrears projects is included in the next section, Summary of Programme Implementation. More complete information on implementation of individual arrears projects is provided in Annex IV on the FAO Web site at www.fao.org/pir/2004/.

1 Expenditure of US$ 829.8 million against the final 2004-05 budget compares with US$ 908.3 million reported as General and Related Funds expenditure in the draft financial accounts (see also Table 1 Expenditure Summary by Source of Funds above). The figures in the Table 4 Budgetary Performance, 2004-05 comprise only those items of expenditure in the financial accounts that are chargeable to the 2004-05 PWB. Specifically: i) it excludes US$ 1.4 million of expenditure incurred by the Information Products Revolving Fund as a separate fund is established for this purpose under Financial Regulation 6.9; ii) it excludes US$ 31.3 million one-time expenditures funded from arrears, as approved by Conference Resolution 6/2001; and iii) it adjusts the expenditure of the TCP so that the entire 2004-05 appropriation of Chapter 4 is assumed to be spent, since unutilised balances will remain available for obligations in 2006-07, in accordance with Financial Regulation 4.3.

2 C 2005/16

1 Technical Cooperation Programme (TCP); Special Programme for Food Security (SPFS); FAO/Government Cooperative Programme (GCP); Unilateral Trust Funds (UTFs); United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)

4 C 99/REP, paragraph 94

5 FAO meeting categories are Category 1: intergovernmental meetings; Category 2: technical sessions attended by experts designated by Members; Category 3: committees and panels of experts composed of individuals selected in a personal capacity by FAO; Category 4: seminars, training courses and workshops. Under any of the categories, meetings can be convened either for statutory bodies, if they have been established, or on an ad hoc basis.

6 The percentages indicated in the Figure have been weighted in Arabic and Chinese, in order to correct for the fact that these languages are covered by teams of three interpreters in each booth for all the meetings (compared to two for the other languages).

7 Optical character reader

8 Excludes field project staff and staff with contracts of less than 12 months.

9 FC 107/15

Previous PageTable of Contents目  录Next Page