|
Address by the Director General for the
Extraordinary Summit of Heads of State and Government
on Agriculture and Water
Syrte, Libya, 27 and 28 February 2004
Your Excellency Colonel Al-Qadhafi, Leader of the Great Al
Fateh Revolution of 1st September of the Socialist People's
Libyan Arab Jamahiriya,
Your Excellency, Mr Chissano, President of the African Union
Your Excellency, Mr Konaré, Chairperson of the African Union Commission
Your Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,
It is a real pleasure for me to come once again to this beautiful
city of Syrte, the privileged birthplace of the African Union.
I should like to express my most sincere thanks to His Excellency,
Colonel Qadhafi, Leader of the Revolution, His Excellency President
Chissano and His Excellency Mr Alpha Omar Konaré, for having done
me the honour of inviting me to join this Summit. Its theme, "Taking
up the challenges for integrated and sustainable development in
Africa: agriculture and water" is of the greatest relevance
to the economic and social development of the continent.
Your Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,
In Africa, agriculture is the main source of livelihood for 57 percent
of the population. It accounts for an average of 17 percent
of gross domestic product and 11 percent of exports (22 percent
in 2000, excluding oil and mineral exports).
Despite its importance to society and to the economy, however, agricultural
performance has fallen short of expectations over the past few decades.
Agricultural growth has failed to keep pace with the rising population,
and agricultural productivity and output have declined.
There are several reasons for these results. Negligible use is made
of modern inputs. Only 22 kg of fertiliser is used per hectare
of arable land in Africa, compared with 144 kg in Asia, for
example. Even less is used in sub-Saharan Africa: only 10 kg
per hectare.
Selected seeds, which have been responsible for the success of the
Green Revolution in Asia and Latin America, thanks to irrigation,
are hardly used at all in Africa. Rural roads, and storage and packaging
facilities are very seriously lacking.
One further factor plays a major part in determining the poor performance
of African agriculture: water. Africa is failing to exploit
the water resources, whether surface water, groundwater or stormwater.
It only uses 4 percent of the available water reserves for
irrigation (1.6 percent in Sub-Saharan Africa), compared with
Asia’s 17 percent (14 percent in South and East Asia).
Taking account of domestic and industrial usage, Africa uses 5 percent
of its total resources compared to 20 percent in Asia. Only
7 percent of all arable land is irrigated in Africa, compared
with around 40 percent in Asia.
Excluding the five countries in which irrigation is the most highly
developed - Morocco, Egypt, Sudan, Madagascar and South Africa -
only 3 percent of arable land is irrigated in for the other
48 countries.
Output from irrigated agriculture is three times that of rain-fed
farming. Yet agriculture on 93 percent of Africa's arable lands
is dependent upon the highly unreliable rainfall, with a serious
risk of drought.
Moreover, 80 percent of all the food crises have to do with water,
and above all water shortages.
Poor water management and the lack of infrastructure are the structural
constraints which account for the lack of productivity and competitiveness
of African agriculture.
The consequences are tragic for the continent, with a present population
of 832 million, likely to reach 2 billion by 2060:
 |
26 percent of the people are undernourished;
|
 |
70 percent of the poor live in the rural environment, and
most of the town-dwellers come from the countryside;
|
 |
23 out of 53 countries suffered from food crises in 2003;
|
 |
agricultural imports into Africa cost 22 billion United States
dollars in 2002;
|
 |
in 2002, food aid totalled 1,7 billion dollars, including
logistics and administrative costs.
|
Your Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,
These grim figures must not discourage us. With the right leadership
and with sufficient political will, Africa must and can change this
situation. Encouraging examples exist in several countries already.
To address this challenge, a wide-ranging programme will have to
be launched looking ahead to 2015, hinging around two components:
Firstly, improved water management must be guaranteed.
Small-scale water collection, irrigation and drainage facilities
built in every village will make it possible to rapidly double the
percentage of irrigated lands to 14 percent, at a reasonable cost.
Existing large scale facilities must be rehabilitated, such as the
dams and irrigation and drainage systems, and their management must
be improved by participatory methods that will give the principal
role to the users.
Lastly, the great river basins and lagoons must be developed through
technical, economic, financial and social sustainable development
programmes and projects. Successful examples of such cooperation
programmes between coastal States already exist in West Africa.
The second component, of the programme is the implementation
of rural infrastructures. Here, Africa is where India was in
1950. Rural roads and tracks and storage and packaging facilities
must be built. Markets, equipped with processing and conservation
facilities for agricultural products, must be installed.
The mobilisation of local labour for these infrastructures will
make it possible to cover 40 percent of the cost of the work
involved.
But for such a programme to be successful, governments not only
have to make the necessary financial effort, but they must also
put into place the supporting measures needed to ensure an increased
rate of return on the investment.
They must support research and improve the structures for agricultural
extension and support. The performance of small farmers' organisations
must be improved. Appropriate solutions also have to be found to
the land tenure problems that are specific to each country. Investment
in products considered to be competitive and with the highest value-added
must also be encouraged.
It is also vitally important to improve the conditions for trade
between States. In this connection, the creation - for example -
of joint ventures between the agriculture-producing countries and
the oil-producing countries would help to bolster the development
of their production and trading capacity. In 2001, the former countries’
petroleum imports were worth 6.3 billion dollars, while the latter
imported agricultural products totalling 11.6 billion dollars.
Tariff barriers and other restrictions on international trade must
also be lifted. The continental market must be made secure by adopting
a common external tariff and other appropriate measures, especially
in view of the support given by the developed countries to agriculture.
Their agricultural aid totalled 318 billion dollars in 2002.
The capacity of the African countries must also be reinforced in
terms of quality standards and the application of international
zoo- and phyto-sanitary rules to protect consumers and boost exports.
Lastly, building up food stocks and reserves at regional economic
union level based on local agricultural products would enhance food
security.
The estimated cost of a programme of this kind is put at about
126 billion dollars between now and 2015, making 10.5 billion
each year for the 53 countries, or 198 million per year and
per country. I would just like to recall that Africa's imports cost
22 billion dollars in 2002.
In the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme, the
total investment is of 251 billion for the period 2002 to 2015,
including extending the area under sustainable land management and
reliable water control systems (US$68 billion), improving rural
infrastructure and trade-related capacities for market access (US$129 billion),
increasing food supply and reducing hunger (US$49.5 billion)
and agricultural research, technology dissemination and adoption
(US$4.6 billion), but excluding forestry, fisheries and livestock
programmes.
The resources must come primarily from the national budgets. Last
July, in Maputo, the African Heads of State and Government undertook
to substantially increase the share of the national budget for agriculture
to reach at least 10 percent over the next five years
In order to comply with the Monterrey and World Food Summit commitments,
public development aid should increase between now and 2015. Resources
provided by OECD countries for agriculture should therefore double
and reach 2.4 billion dollars each year for Africa.
The decline in development aid for agriculture must be reversed.
Development partners must be made aware of the importance of financing
the agricultural sector. This effort could apply in particular to
the Programme for the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries, and the Poverty
Reduction Strategy Papers of the International Monetary Fund and
the World Bank. It would also apply to the 9th European Development
Fund at the time of the mid-term review. The same objectives would
also apply to funding provided by regional and sub-regional banks,
and bilateral aid.
Lastly, the private sector should also be encouraged to invest in
agriculture.
These measures, which emphasise the competitive supply of agricultural
products and access to the continental market, will have to be completed
by international trade negotiation initiatives in order to get customs
duties reduced, and technical barriers to trade against Africa's
agricultural products abolished.
Your Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,
Following the historic Maputo Declaration on Agriculture and Food
Security in Africa, this Syrte Summit should make it possible to
translate those commitments into coherent, realistic and effective
programmes.
FAO has helped in the preparation of the detailed programme for
the development of agriculture in Africa within the framework of
NEPAD. FAO remains at the disposal of the African Governments to
continue supporting them in the preparation of continental, regional
and national programmes, and to conduct feasibility studies of projects
judged to be promising.
In this way, the necessary domestic and external resources could
be rapidly marshalled, in conjunction with the international financial
institutions and bilateral and multilateral partners.
Thank you for your attention.
Back to 2004 statements
|