| World
Summit 2005 Fight poverty at the core When the world’s
leaders gather in New York for the World Summit this month, they will be subjected
to a barrage of special pleading and advocacy. But the voice they probably will
not hear is the most important one: that of the poor and hungry struggling to
raise and feed their families on a parched patch of land in the developing world.
They are among more than 850 million chronically hungry people worldwide.
And their plight is what it is really all about. Can we continue to live
with the scandal of great wealth and conspicuous consumption coexisting with misery,
malnutrition and early death? Can we really be surprised if such injustice produces
a lost generation bent on violence and destruction? The presidents and
prime ministers coming to the Summit will be reviewing progress towards achieving
the eight Millennium Development Goals agreed five years ago. The first is the
reduction of the incidence of extreme hunger and poverty. It is the critical one,
because unless it is achieved, the others will fail too. Hunger and poverty
are inextricably linked: hunger is not only the most obvious manifestation of
poverty, but it is also one of its principle causes. There is a vicious spiral
at work that condemns millions and millions of our fellow citizens to short, stunted,
unfulfilled lives. The key battleground in the fight to eradicate hunger
and poverty is the countryside. After all, three quarters of the 1.1 billion
people living on less than a dollar a day live in the rural areas of developing
countries and depend on agriculture for their survival. The logic is therefore
inescapable: invest in agriculture and rural infrastructure. It is inconceivable
that progress can be achieved without renewing the global commitment to agriculture
and the rural economies of poor countries. Yet, over the past 20 years
official development assistance going to these sectors in the poorest countries
has been cut by more than half, from US$5.14 billion to US$2.22 billion.
The numbers speak for themselves. Despite this, more than 30 developing
countries, with a total population exceeding 2.2 billion people, have succeeded
in reducing the numbers of their undernourished by more than 25 percent.
And they all achieved significantly higher growth in agricultural GDP than the
developing countries as a whole. Once again, the numbers say it all.
But the success of these countries is threatened by continuing injustices in the
world trading system. With industrialized countries supporting their agriculture
to the tune of nearly US$1 billion a day, international commodity prices
are driven down and farmers in the poor countries find themselves being undercut
in their own markets. In Hong Kong in December, trade negotiators will
try to find some way to address these issues. Will liberalization of agricultural
trade in some cases threaten food security and the alleviation of rural poverty?
Will protection of the agricultural sector by poor countries sometimes be justified
to ensure food security? And what are the most appropriate policies for ensuring
food security while moving towards a more liberal trade regime? There
has been much talk about level playing fields but there is a long way to go
before we achieve such a desirable state. Meanwhile, we continue to watch
on TV and read in newspapers the plight of children dying because of drought in
Niger and the Sahel. And after the usual blaming game, we rush in food aid, at
huge logistical cost. Then we wait for the next crisis, without addressing the
root causes of the problem by building the essential water control systems and
rural infrastructures. The economic cost of doing nothing about hunger
is tremendous: if hunger persists at current levels, every year it will cause
deaths and disability in developing countries with the related loss of productivity
amounting to a staggering US$50 billion. The human cost is appalling
too; every year without progress costs five million children their lives. September
2005 Published in The Guardian (UK),
Ottawa Citizen (Canada), Le Monde (France), La Vanguardia (Spain)
among other newspapers |