KABUL/ROME, 1 August 2002
-- A campaign to control a locust outbreak in Northern
Afghanistan has succeeded in keeping crop damage to a minimum.
The UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) estimates crop
losses in the three most seriously affected provinces, the
breadbasket of the war-torn country, at about 7 percent. But FAO
urged that control operations needed to start early next spring
to avoid another locust emergency.
FAO
and the Afghan plant protection staff are currently implementing
a survey of the areas in which locusts are laying their
egg-pods. When the results are known, contingency plans and
preparedness programmes will be drawn up for the 2003 control
campaign which will attempt to avoid the development of another
major outbreak.
According to FAO locust
control expert Andrew Harvey, the survivors of the locusts that
infested hundreds of thousands of hectares of farmland in
Northern Afghanistan in the first half of 2002, have laid eggs
across a wide stretch of land.
"We can't afford to wait until the eggs
hatch next year and develop into swarms before taking
action," Harvey said. "We have to find out
where the eggs are laid and kill the young hoppers as early as
possible when they hatch out in the spring, before they can
become adults and are able to fly."
Moroccan locust (Dociostaurus maroccanus) infestations
occur annually in Northern Afghanistan. The scale and intensity
of the infestations vary from year to year.
"This year, because it was an emergency
campaign, only the locusts directly threatening the crops could
be controlled to mitigate crop damage," Harvey said.
"But, with a properly prepared campaign, we can not
only reduce the damage on crops even further next year, but also
begin to bring the overall numbers down to a level that can be
managed by a sustainable long-term control strategy."
In March this year, FAO launched a US$800
000 campaign to combat the worst locust plague to hit
Afghanistan for thirty years. Funding was provided by the US,
the UK, and from FAO's own resources. The exceptionally
high locust population was the result of two years without
control and favourable breeding conditions created by the
drought. Three out of the nine Northern provinces, Baghlan,
Samangan and Kunduz, were particularly hard hit and over 70
percent of crop production across the north was judged to be at
risk.
The locust eradication campaign was
run by Afghan staff. FAO, NGOs and other UN agencies provided
necessary technical expertise and inputs. This meant that by
mid-June just under 240 000 ha had been cleared using mechanical
or chemical methods. The success of the campaign is all the more
striking given the logistical and security constraints under
which the control teams had to operate.
In
the 1990s FAO helped to set up community control mechanisms,
whereby farmers were trained to monitor where the eggs were
being laid and to kill the vulnerable young hoppers as they
emerged from the ground, by driving them into trenches and
burying them.
This method, known as
mechanical control, only works if it is carried out every year
and if communities can be mobilised on a large scale. Following
the collapse of the Taliban regime at the end of 2001, locust
control programme resources were looted and the emergency
campaign of 2002 had to start from scratch. It soon became
apparent that mechanical control was being overwhelmed by the
size of the outbreak and the amount of chemical control was
accordingly increased.
In a race against
time, FAO organized an airlift of pesticides and spraying
equipment into Northern Afghanistan for deployment against the
locusts. For areas not accessible by road, a helicopter was used
to distribute the materials. Five vehicle-mounted sprayers and 1
300 hand-held sprayers were used to apply almost 30 000 litres
of pesticides against the hopper bands. Around 250 locally
recruited operators were employed either by FAO or NGOs to
protect the livelihoods of some four million people.
Another important step was to establish a locust
database to record survey and control information, to be used
for subsequent analysis and future planning. Vital information
collected during earlier control programmes was lost during
looting.









