| Agricultural production |
| Food Balance Sheets |
| Land & means of production |
| Agricultural & food trade |
| Producer prices |
| Programmes and instructions |
| Questionnaires, software, metadata ... |
| Virtual Library of Statistics Division (
UNDER CONSTRUCTION ) |
|
Most, if not all statistical offices or organizations involved
in agricultural statistics, (viz., production and trade of commodities)
keep their data in separate files, separate computers and, sometimes,
perhaps even at separate locations. In this document the advantages
of maintaining such data "side by side" in a single file, with interlinking
algorithms, are pointed out . This results in added value to the
data and, at the same time, leads to the estimation of other useful
data, which may not otherwise be available. This document promotes
the establishment of a particular database structure of agricultural
statistics in the form of supply utilization accounts (SUAs).
Supply utilization accounts are time series data
dealing with statistics on supply (production, imports and stock
changes) and utilization (exports, seed, feed, waste, industrial
use, food, and other use) which are kept physically together to
allow the matching of food availability with food use.
Furthermore, by taking the data for a period, limiting
it to food commodities and converting the food into calories, proteins
and fats (commodity by commodity), it is possible to prepare food
balance sheets (FBS). This document promotes a particular report
output from the database in the form of food balance sheets.
A food balance sheet presents a
comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply
during a specified reference period. The total quantity of foodstuffs
produced in a country, added to the total quantity imported and
adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the
beginning of the reference period, gives the supply available
during that period. On the utilization side, a distinction
is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used
for seed, processed for food use and non-food uses, lost during
storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human
consumption. The per caput supply of each food item available for
human consumption is then calculated by dividing the respective
quantity by the related data on the population actually consuming
it; that is the meaning of the term- per caput. Data on per caput
food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and also - by applying
appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed
products - in terms of caloric value, protein and fat.
The internet document looks at some
benefits and limitations of constructing supply utilization accounts
and food balance sheets.
Ladislav Kabat
Director
FAO Statistics Division
I. INTRODUCTION
All recognize the importance of
development planning and share the goal to achieve higher standards
of living. Timely and reliable statistics are needed to prepare
and monitor such plans. The statistical framework of supply/utilization
accounts (referred to as SUAs) for food and agricultural commodities
can be a very powerful tool for making the best use of available
statistical information and the Statistics Division advocates this
agricultural database structure that is referred to as a supply
utilization accounts database.
Establishing a SUA for each 12-month
period will also help to pinpoint many inconsistencies in the statistical
series, which lead to a better recognition of the need to improve
the data on food and agriculture. While in food balance sheets (hereafter
referred to as FBS) data extracted from SUAs present a comprehensive
picture of country's pattern of food supply during a specified reference
period.
II. MEANING OF "SUPPLY UTILIZATION ACCOUNTS"
General Description
The increased involvement of government
authorities concerned with assessment, monitoring and planning exercises
in the field of agriculture and rural development has had a significant
impact on processing methods for the compilation and analysis of
statistical data. It is no longer meaningful to deal separately
with individual statistical series, such as those of production
and trade, etc. Although individual data series continue to be important,
it is equally important to establish the links between them. It
is necessary to deal with flows and matrices rather than with individual
sets of data. The statistics of any single commodity have to be
traced all the way from production and utilization to final consumption.
As a consequence of maintaining
the data series in this integrated fashion, it is possible to compute
a variety of derived statistics and indicators relating to food
and agriculture in a consistent manner from the same central data
storage. The core statistics of such a statistical framework are
the SUAs for food and agricultural commodities. For each product,
the SUA traces supplies from production, imports and stocks to its
utilization in different forms: addition to stocks, exports, animal
feed, seed, processing for food and non-food purposes, waste (or
losses), and, lastly, as food available to the population, where
appropriate.
SUAs are then essentially time series
data for various elements of food statistics, which are kept side
by side.
SUA Equations
These elements can be inter-related
in a number of balancing equations. The first equates the sum of
the supply elements:
Opening stocks + production + imports
With the sum of the utilization
elements:
Exports + feed + seed + waste + processing for food + food + other
utilization + closing stocks.
For the preparation of a balance
like this, it assumes that reliable and independent information
is available for each of its elements. Alternatively, if no information
is available for one of the elements, the residual will provide
an estimate. In practice, however, the construction of balances
of this type is made difficult by the absence of adequate information
on opening and closing stocks. Experience shows, however, that information
on changes in stocks is made more readily available than on their
actual size. If a net decrease in stocks is defined as "from stocks"
and a net increase in stocks as "to stocks" the following two equations
will be obtained:
i) from stocks + production +
imports = exports + feed + seed + waste + processing for food +
food + other utilization;
or:
ii) production + imports = exports
+ feed + seed + waste + processing for food + food + other utilization
+ to stocks.
The combination of production and
imports with both increases and decreases in stocks results in a
supply available for export and domestic utilization, where domestic
utilization is defined as the sum of: feed + seed + waste + processing
for food + food + other utilization.
Advantages of SUAs
The advantage of storing the commodity
data in the form of SUAs is that they are internally consistent.
Each element of supply of a commodity matches the other and total
supply matches total utilization. This system provides a check on
the statistical data supplied by various national and/or international
agencies. It also provides a useful tool for choosing between alternative
sources of data and a logical framework for estimating missing observations.
Even so, every effort must be made to make the data consistent by
adhering, as far as possible, to the same definitions, coverage,
specifications, etc., for each commodity and element. Since total
supply equals total utilization, the accounts are in the form of
balancing equations with the result that one element usually is
calculated as the remainder or residual.
Conceptual Problems Related to the
Preparation of SUAs
-
The most important conceptual problem arises
mainly with respect to the accuracy and availability of data.
Incompleteness and inaccuracy of basic data tend to be the main
problems, even where the statistics are available, they are
not always reliable. Official production data is sometimes questionable.
This is because farmers frequently equate production with tax
collection and, in some cases, reliable information on food
losses caused by pests and disease is not available. Hence the
estimates of yield are likely to be inaccurate. If so, it follows
that production statistics derived from the harvested and estimated
yield may be subject to a biased estimation. Crop patterns and
utilization of some crops (e.g., cassava and bananas) is not
completely harvested. Some is left as a reserve to be used if
the need arises or perhaps left to rot.
-
Production statistics may not be available
for all commodities needed and mostly confined to important
food crops. Non-commercial or subsistence production, i.e. home
produce and food from hunting, fishing and gathering by the
household for their own consumption, is usually not included
or it is not available which may be a large part of total production
in some countries.
-
Information on commercial stocks may be available
from official or marketing authorities, factories, wholesalers
and retailers, but inventories of catering establishments; institutions
and households may not be available.
-
Information on waste in industrial processing
may be easily found, but waste during storage, transportation
may not be available and other waste information - on quantities
intentionally discarded for the purpose of price control or
disease control - may be hidden. In these cases, even though
the basic data are reliable, some adjustments are required to
adapt the basic data to FBS concepts/coverage.
-
Import and export data may be accurate in
the majority of countries, but in others, there may be significant
amounts of trade across national boundaries that go unrecorded.
Moreover, import and export transactions may not receive equal
attention from the custom's administration because taxes or
quotas are generally concentrated more on import items than
export. As a consequence, the reliability of export data may
also be questionable.
-
There may not exist basic data on the feed,
seed and industrial/manufacture use of crop and livestock products.
The cost of production surveys and manufacturing surveys, which
are the appropriate sources of data, are often not conducted
regularly in developing countries. Even where the surveys are
conducted, their coverage is usually limited (e.g., cost of
production surveys cover only a few important crops or do not
cover livestock commodities, etc.).
-
There are also problems related to the time-reference
period to be used in reporting production. Several twelve-month
periods, such as July/June, October/September and April/March
have been proposed and were indeed also applied. However, none
of these periods covered satisfactorily and uniformly the production
of all agricultural commodities, their trade and domestic utilization.
It can be assumed that there is no single twelve-month period
which is fully suitable for recording supply and utilization
for all products. It was therefore felt that although the calendar
year time-reference period (January-December) might not be a
completely satisfactory solution, its advantage would appear
to outweigh its disadvantages. The application of a calendar
year time-reference period during which the bulk of the harvest
takes place also helps in linking the agricultural statistics
with those of the industrial and other sectors of the economy.
Preparing SUAs
Ideally, the basic data required
should be obtained from just one authority. This implies that, firstly,
the country should have a comprehensive statistical system, which
records all current information relating to each component of the
FBS (from producers to consumers). Secondly, concepts of the information
adopted should be those of the FBS. Thirdly, the information available
should be consistent, at least with respect to measurement unit
and time reference period. In practice, however, such an ideal statistical
system does not exist. Even in those mainly developed countries,
which possess uncommonly sophisticated reporting procedures, the
available data do not always meet either the second or third condition.
Therefore, the basic data are necessarily based on a large variety
of sources.
As mentioned before, since the basic
data are obtained from different sources, they are subject to inconsistency.
Their concepts are not likely to be the same as the FBS concepts,
since they were not primarily planned for that purpose. The time
reference period may not be consistent throughout, or there may
be some time lag in the available data. The existence of all these
problems shouldn't stop the expert using this most powerful tool.
As far as possible, an effort should be made to put data from different
sources together to prepare SUAs. The main sources commonly used
are discussed below.
Production and trade data are part
of ongoing national official statistics. They are based either on
direct enquiries and records, or are estimated by government agencies.
Information on stock changes is available from marketing authorities
and factories or from farmer stock surveys. Information on industrial
uses is obtained from industrial/manufacturing censuses/surveys.
Feed and seeding rates are obtained from cost of production surveys
or are estimated by the government agencies concerned. Waste in
industrial processing is also obtained from manufacturing surveys.
In some cases, the exercise has to be based also on other external
sources.
Adjustments to the basic data and
estimation/imputation of the missing data are necessary in order
to maintain a certain degree of consistency, completeness and reliability
of the resulting FBS . This is a basic axiom that one
must work from. The underlying "hidden" assumption is that any number
based on a professional estimation is preferred to zero. The FAO
Conference, which is the governing body of FAO, has instructed us
to do this estimation. Both official and unofficial data available
in the Statistics Division and other units in FAO have been used
to construct the SUAs. Missing data have been estimated on the basis
of various surveys (of differing sizes), other information available
to the economics and statistics community through the media and
in particular professional journals, as well as technical expertise
available in FAO.
At first, it is necessary to draw
up a list of relevant primary and processed commodities, when establishing
a coordinated system of SUAs. The definition of a complete list
of commodities presents virtually insurmountable difficulties -
both conceptual and statistical. For practical purposes, therefore,
a workable list of commodities will have to be adopted. In drawing
up such a list, countries may wish to keep in mind a general list
of food and agricultural commodities.
A great degree of detail is required
for the proper choice of food nutritive composition factors used
for nutritional analyses (e.g., calorie, proteins and fat per 100
grams) of the food item, while the commodity list itself just depends
on the different foods available in the country. As an example,
this calls for specifying the proportions of different cheese from
whole milk or from skim milk, since the nutritive factors differ.
Similarly, the caloric and nutrient content of wheat (and other
cereals) depends on the extraction rate used, the variety (hard
or soft) of wheat milled and its water content.
Among the various criteria to be
taken into account when setting-up a commodity list, choosing suitable
reporting units deserves particular attention. The data should be
expressed in common units in order to facilitate international comparisons
and the metric system should be adopted whenever possible. Values
and prices should be converted and expressed in terms of a suitable
currency.
Whenever possible, trade in processed commodities
should be expressed in the primary commodity equivalent, e.g. orange
juice trade can be converted into orange equivalent trade data.
In Appendix 1, commodities are classified
into major food groups for FBS purposes. This list should, however,
be adjusted according to the availability of commodities in a given
country.
It is useful to note that SUAs are
used to prepare a number of statistical measures some important
ones are:
i) Index numbers of production,
trade and supply: One of the most important indicators for reviewing
agricultural progress, and one that is extensively used, is the
series of index numbers of food and agricultural production (total
and per caput). Similarly, trade index numbers can be calculated
independently for value, volume and unit values, as well as index
numbers of food supply (total and per caput).
ii) Self-sufficiency ratios and
import dependency ratios: These indicate the extent to which
a country's supply of commodities and/or total food is derived from
national production or originates from abroad.
iii) Food balance sheets reports
(FBS):
III. WHAT ARE FOOD BALANCE SHEETS (FBS)
General Description
FBS are one important report coming from supply utilization
accounts.
They are extracted out of time series
SUAs and report a single year (or an average number of years) multiplying
the food available by the nutritive factors, to access the calorie
protein and fat available to the general population. FBS are a special
report, which is generated from the SUA database in conjunction
with certain additional vital data, viz., food nutritional values
and the total population data for the country. The new element here
is the nutritive factors and the abandonment of multi-year information
or time series data to a single year.
They are perhaps the major output
of the FAO Statistics Division, although they are often overlooked
by many who are more familiar with the FAO Production Yearbook,
the FAO Trade Yearbook and the FAO Fertilizer Yearbook.
The FBS are the statistical basis of much of FAO's long term forecasting
and projections work and regularly become the major input into quantifying
the numbers of malnourished in the world. They are generated once
we have in place our SUA database.
Origin of FBS
The first attempts at preparing
FBS date back to World War I. FBS were the leading source of data
when, in 1936, at the request of the League of Nations Mixed Committee
on the Problem of Nutrition and its Sub-Committee on Nutritional
Statistics, a systematic international comparison of food consumption
data was prepared.
During World War II, the interest
in FBS increased considerably. The Inter-Allied Committee on Post-war
Requirements used them in 1942/43 in their studies of post-war requirements
in European countries and an even more detailed technique was developed
and employed by a joint committee of experts from Canada, the United
States of America and the United Kingdom in the report "Food Consumption
Levels in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom". During
these years, FBS were also constructed in Germany for the country
itself as well as for the occupied countries. In the work of the
International Emergency Food Council, which dealt with problems
of food allocation and distribution in the period of worldwide food
shortages after the war, FBS played an important role.
From the outset, the Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United Nations (FAO) has given considerable
importance to furthering the development of FBS, reflecting their
usefulness in analyzing the food situation at the level of individual
countries. The technique has been extensively employed in FAO's
"World Food Surveys". The "Handbook for the Preparation of Food
Balance Sheets" was published in 1949. Since then, FBS have
been prepared and published by FAO on a regular basis.
Calculating Per Caput Food Supply
in FBS
The estimate of the total population is also a part
of the set of ongoing official statistics. The per caput figure
of each food commodity is obtained by dividing the food available
for human consumption figure by the total population consuming it
during the reference period. However, for many countries, this figure
may also be subject to either incomplete or unreliable data. The
total population estimates may refer to resident population only.
Thus, non-resident population, such as illegal immigrants, tourists,
refugees, foreign diplomatic personnel and their dependants, foreign
armed forces, etc., are usually not included and these omitted individuals
may constitute a considerable part of the population in some countries,
if they were not counted in the population. This, therefore, would
result in understating the total consuming population.
In food balance sheet, per caput
food supplies in terms of quantity are given both in kilograms per
year and grams per day. Calorie supplies are expressed in kilocalories
(calories) per day, while supplies of protein and fat are provided
in grams per day.
For the purpose of calculating the
caloric value and the protein and fat content of the per caput food
supplies, the choice of the appropriate food composition factors
is very important. For example, the choice of the food composition
factors for wheat flour depends, among other factors, on the water
content, variety, and the degree of milling involved. The choice
of the corresponding factors for cheese depends on whether the cheese
is derived from whole milk, partly whole milk, or skim milk, as
well as whether the cheese has been made from the milk of cows,
sheep, goats, buffaloes, or camels, and lastly on whether the cheese
is hard, semi-soft or soft. The nutritive factors can be obtained
directly from the national food composition tables of the health
authorities. These tables give the nutritional composition of food
per 100 grams of edible portion.
As the quantity data of the FBS
are on an "as purchased" basis, it is necessary that the nutritive
composition in terms of edible portion be converted into this basis
as well. The conversion is made by applying waste/refuse factors
to the nutritive composition in term of edible portion. The resulting
per caput total nutritive values are usually expressed on a daily
basis. In the absence of food composition tables prepared by appropriate
national institutions, one can use FAO's Food Composition Tables
- Minerals and Vitamins - for International Use.
For calories, protein and fat, a
grand total with a breakdown into components of vegetable and animal
origin is shown at the beginning or the end of the food balance
sheet.
Finally, one should
pay special attention to the following when examining per
caput food consumption and FBS in a country or a region:
-
changes in the energy and protein availability,
-
adequacy of average energy and protein availability,
-
starchy staples,
-
starchy staple ratio and animal products ratio,
-
changes in the starchy staple ratio and animal
products ratio,
-
the trade situation: self sufficiency or import
dependency
-
consumption of "luxury" foods.
It is useful to take examine a few
formats for FBS. Various formats, which have been developed over
the years, still exist and can be used for the preparation and presentation
of FBS. (See Appendix 2)
Advantages of FBS
-
Annual FBS tabulated regularly over a period
of years will show overall trends in the national food supply,
disclose changes that may have taken place in the types of food
consumed, i.e., the pattern of the diet, and reveal the extent
to which the food supply of the country as a whole is adequate
in relation to nutritional requirements.
-
By bringing together the larger part of the
food and agricultural data in each country, FBS are useful in
making a detailed examination and appraisal of the food and
agricultural situation in a country. A comparison of the quantities
of food available for human consumption with those imported
will indicate the extent to which a country depends upon imports
(import dependency ratio) to feed itself. The amount of food
crops used for feeding livestock in relation to total crop production
indicates the degree to which primary food resources are used
to produce animal feed which is useful information for analysing
livestock policies or patterns of agriculture. Data on per caput
food supplies are an important element for projecting food demand.
This data is the basis of projections into the future and are
used with other information such as income elasticity and national
income forecasts to analyze various possible scenarios for the
year 2010, 2020 and recently forecast to the year 2030. FBS
let you tell a story in a single presentation or report format.
They are a powerful tool to the speechwriter, the analyst, the
economist, the policy maker, the nutritionist and even the military.
They allow those that have it to describe the status of the
country - rich or poor - the health of the country - the trade
situation in food - and together with past FBS the direction
development is taking and can be useful for economic and nutritional
studies, for preparing development plans and for formulating
related projects.
-
The calorie values obtained as the mean in
the FBS become proxies for the food consumption mean intake
and when combined with the variance in food consumption data
collected from household consumption - or expenditure surveys
- are used to estimate the distribution (function) of food intakes
in the country. Finally, if we apply a particular cut-off point
or value, in terms of human nutrition requirements, we are able
to estimate the numbers malnourished, which is a very important
capacity.
Some notable limitations
FBS are often far from satisfactory in the proper
statistical sense, as is explained below:
-
The accuracy of FBS depends on the reliability
of the underlying basic statistics of population, supply and
utilization of foods and on the accuracy of the nutritive value
data of various foods which is usually the mandate of the national
health and nutrition authorities. The data vary a lot both in
terms of coverage and accuracy. In fact, there are many gaps
particularly in the statistics of utilization for non-food purposes,
such as feed, seed and manufacture, as well as in those of farm,
commercial and even government stocks. To overcome the former
difficulty, estimates can be prepared while the effect of the
absence of statistics on stocks is considered to be reduced
by preparing the FBS as an average for a three-year period.
But even production statistics (on which the accuracy of FBS
depends) are, in many cases, subject to improvement through
carrying out statistical field surveys. Furthermore, there are
few surveys on which to base sound figures for waste. In some
cases, these estimates are subject to significant margins of
error. Typically, assumptions about waste are based on expert
opinion obtained in a country.
-
At the same time, FBS do not give any indication
of the differences that may exist in the diet consumed by different
population groups, e.g., people of different socio-economic
groups, ecological zones or geographical areas within a country.
-
Nor do they provide information on seasonal
variations in the total food supply. To obtain a complete picture,
food consumption surveys (which show the distribution of the
national food supply at various times of the year and among
different groups of the population) should be conducted. In
fact, the FBS and food consumption surveys are complementary
and many countries do both of these. There are commodities for
which a production estimate could best be based on estimated
consumption as obtained from food consumption surveys.
It is very important to be aware of the fact that
availability for human consumption is by no means identical
with consumption. The quantities of food available for human consumption,
as estimated in the food balance sheet, reflect only the quantities
reaching the consumer. The amount of food actually consumed may
be lower than the quantity shown in the food balance sheet depending
on the degree of losses of edible food and nutrients in the household,
e.g., during storage, in preparation and cooking (which affect vitamins
and minerals to a greater extent than they do calories, protein
and fat), as plate-waste, or quantities fed to domestic animals
and pets, or thrown away.
IV. CONCLUSION
The SUA account database structure
works for the agricultural statistician and is a useful tool in
agricultural statistics. Furthermore, FBS generated from SUAs are
often extremely useful for economists, planners, and health experts,
but in view of the difficulty in obtaining accurate data, FBS need
to be interpreted with much caution. They are a powerful means of
bringing together from different sources, information about a food
economy and are excellent for showing very broad changes in a food
economy over a given period of time. The adoption of a programme
of work that includes both SUAs and FBS is recommended to all involved
in agricultural data and analysis.
For more on Food Balance Sheets check out our
PUBLICATIONS now
or
download here a MS PowerPoint presentation
of this internet document (3.9 MB, zipped)
Appendix 1
LIST OF COMMODITIES CLASSIFIED BY MAJOR FOOD GROUPS
CEREALS
Wheat Rice (paddy)
Barley
Maize Rye Oats
Millet Sorghum
Cereals other
STARCHY ROOTS
Potatoes
Sweet potatoes
Cassava
Roots other
SUGAR
Sugar cane
Sugar beet
Sugar
non-centrifugal Sugar (raw equiv.)
Honey
PULSES
Beans
Peas
Pulses other
TREE NUTS
Cashew nuts
Chestnuts
Almonds
Pistachio
Walnuts
OIL CROPS - Primary
Soybeans
Groundnuts
Sunflower seed
Rapeseed & Mustard seed
Cotton seed
Coconuts (incl.copra)
Sesame seed
Palm kernels
Olives
Oilcrops other
VEGETABLES
Tomatoes
Onions
Vegetables other
FRUIT
Oranges
Mandarines
Lemons
Limes
Grapefruit
Citrus other
Bananas Plantains
Apples (excl. cider)
Pineapples
Dates
Grapes (excl. wine)
Fruit other
STIMULANTS
Coffee
Cocoa beans
Tea
SPICES
Pepper
Pimento
Clove
Spices other
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES
Wine
Barley beer
Beverages fermented
Beverages alcoholic
Alcohol
non-food
MEAT
Bovine meat
Mutton/goat meat
Pig meat
Poultry meat
Other meat
Offals
MILK
Cow milk
Sheep milk
Goat milk
EGGS
Hen eggs
Eggs other
FISH AND SEAFOOD
Freshwater fish
Marine fish
Crustaceans
Molluscs
VEGETABLE OILS - Secondary
Soybean oil
Groundnut oil
Sunflower-seed oil
Rape & mustard oil
Cottonseed oil
Palm kernel oil
Palm oil
Copra oil
Sesame-seed oil
Olive oil
Oilcrops oil other
ANIMAL FATS
Butter ghee
Cream
Fats animal raw
Appendix 2
FORMATS OF FOOD BALANCE SHEETS
The three "Sample Forms for Food
Balance Sheets" that are shown have different headings for various
columns which need some further explanations.
Format I
Available supply represents the
concept of supply available for domestic utilization.
Food (gross) is simply the balance of the available
supply after feed, seed, manufacture and waste have been deducted.
It represents the quantities directly available to consumers before
the application of extraction rates, if this is necessary.
Extraction rate applies chiefly to cereals and is
used to effect a conversion of grains to flour and of paddy rice
to milled rice. This column is also used to show the extraction
of raw sugar from cane and sugar beets and of oil from oilseeds
and so on. In addition to reflecting the input/output ratio between
originating/parent commodity and processed commodity, the extraction
rate also determines the choice of the appropriate food composition
factors.
Food (net) represents the actual quantities of food
directly available for human consumption after the application of
extraction rates to the corresponding figures in the food (gross)
column.
Columns 18-20 show the food composition factors which
have been applied when converting the quantities of daily per caput
food supplies into energy, protein and fat content.

Format II
The headings in this second format
are a more general format than Format I.

Format III
This third format may be used when
presenting a food balance sheet in standardized form.
Processed Trade (E-I) shows exports minus imports
of processed commodities expressed in their primary/parent commodity
equivalent and where "E" denotes exports and "I" denotes imports.
Stock changes indicate increases (+), or decreases
(-), in stocks.
Food Manufacture shows amounts of the commodity in
question used to manufacture processed commodities which are part
of a separate food group (e.g., fats and oils, beverages).
Other uses comprise quantities used for the manufacture
of non-food products, e.g., oil for soap. In order not to distort
the picture of the national food pattern, quantities mainly consumed
by tourists may be included here.
Food includes commodities
consumed in the form of secondary products as well as their primary
form . This, for example, in the case of wheat, means cakes and
biscuits and wheat flour.
|