Since 2010 FAO’s country-level cooperation has progressively been prioritized and planned in the form of a Country Programming Framework (CPF). In the case of the Kyrgyz Republic, the CPF had initially covered the period 2012-15 but was recently updated (December 2014) upon Government’s request to reflect changes in priorities both in the country and at FAO. The revised CPF covers the period 2015-17 and is aligned to the National Sustainable Development Strategy (2013-17) and the UN Development Assistance Framework (2013-17). The main objective of the Evaluation of FAO’s Country Programme in the Kyrgyz Republic will be to assess the contributions made by FAO to national food and agricultural development in the period 2010-14 with a focus on the thematic areas prioritized in the CPF. The findings, lessons learnt, and best-fit practices identified through the evaluation will be used to inform ongoing and future work in the country.
The Evaluation of the FAO Somalia Resilience Programme will aim to assess FAO’s performance in resilience building in Somalia over the past two years (2013-2014). It will assess the extent to which the programme has contributed to building the resilience of Somali people taking into consideration the protracted crisis nature of the context, and identify success factors and challenges. It will provide in-depth external analysis of the various achievements of the resilience programme, as well as of the bottlenecks and challenges, and generate recommendations for adaptation of the activities and implementation modalities for enhanced performance of the programme.
The Office of Evaluation is currently assessing the Food and Agriculture Organization’s (FAO) cooperation with Burkina Faso during the 2010-2014 timeframe. The evaluation was launched in 2014, with the main evaluation phase to be carried out from March to May 2015. During this period, the team will meet with stakeholders at the national and decentralized levels, as well as beneficiaries at project sites. The evaluation will assess FAO’s role and results achieved in the priority areas identified in the Country Programming Framework (CPF). The document, developed in consultation with government and other national stakeholders, provides the framework for FAO’s cooperation with the country. In addition to identifying lessons learnt and best practices, the results will be used to better orient FAO’s future cooperation with Burkina Faso and inform the development of priority areas for the new CPF cycle.
The Office of Evaluation (OED) recently launched an evaluation of FAO’s cooperation with Lao PDR in order to assess the contributions made by FAO to the country during 2009-2014. The evaluation, currently underway, will take place between October 2014-July 2015, with preparatory work including an inception mission in January, and a full evaluation mission in May 2015. Since 2013, FAO’s country-level cooperation with Lao PDR has been implemented under the structure of a Country Programming Framework (CPF), which covers the period 2013-2015 and reflects the priorities of the government and FAO for food and agricultural development in the country. The evaluation will focus on results achieved in terms of technical and emergency support in the priority areas identified by the CPF, and in assessing the scope for further development of the programme in the areas of FAO’s mandate. Findings from the evaluation, including lessons learnt and best practices, will be used to inform FAO’s future cooperation with the country and to update the priorities in the new CPF cycle.
In October 2011, FAO’s Programme Committee requested OED to carry out an evaluation of FAO’s work on genetic resources, in order to “assess the work on policies and capacity development with respect to the management of forest, plant, animal and aquatic genetic resources, as well as to the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity for food and agriculture.” FAO’s main coordinating body is the Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (CGRFA), many of the objectives of GR work are expressed in Global Action Plans, and progress made in GR work is, to some extent, measured in “state of the world” reports. One important aspect of this evaluation will be to assess the extent to which FAO support to international fora, capacity development activities and monitoring mechanisms has been successful to measure trends, identify issues and support governments in their management of genetic resources.
In 2011, the Programme Committee (PC) requested an evaluation of FAO’s Work on Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation. This evaluation will focus on assessing the results of FAO’s work at country-level in terms of improvements in national systems for climate change adaptation and mitigation, and in the livelihoods resilience of beneficiaries. The evaluation will also assess FAO’s internal coordination and strategy with respect to climate change adaptation and mitigation, as well as FAO’s engagement in the global-level dialogue on climate change through the various international fora, alliances and conventions. The evaluation report will be presented to the Programme Committee in November 2015.
The Immediate Plan of Action for FAO Renewal (IPA) approved by FAO Conference in 2008, included approximately 100 actions aimed at reforming FAO governance mechanism. The IPA also foresaw that in 2015, “the Conference will assess the workings of the governance reforms, including the role and functioning of the Regional Conferences, with an independent review as an input to this process.”
After extensive consultation with all parties concerned, coordinated by the Independent Chair of the Council, in December 2013 FAO Council endorsed the arrangements proposed for the conduct of an Independent Review of the IPA-related governance reforms. FAO Office of Evaluation was asked to manage and support the review.
The main objective of the review will be to contribute to the assessment of the performance of FAO’s governance system, including the role and functioning of the Regional Conferences, through evidence-based identification and analysis of progress accomplished and of areas or aspects where further improvement is feasible. The review will be carried out by a team comprising independent consultants and OED staff throughout 2014: activities will include observation of sessions of key Governing Bodies throughout the year, desk review, one-to-one interviews, focus group discussions and questionnaires, which will be completed by December 2014 and presented to FAO Governing Bodies and finally to the Conference, in 2015.
In October 2011, the 108th Session of the Programme Committee requested the conduct of an evaluation of FAO's role in the dissemination of knowledge on food, agriculture and natural resources in 2014. Since 2011, FAO has adopted an explicit integrated approach to the generation, management, sharing, communication and transfer of knowledge and information related to food, agriculture and natural resources. The evaluation will assess these multiple roles of FAO with respect to knowledge. The evaluation report will be presented to the Programme Committee in 2015.
Since 2005, country evaluations have been part of the evaluation programme of FAO; they cover all FAO activities in the country, including national projects from all funding sources, national participation in regional projects, use made of normative outputs and the work and functioning of the FAO Representation. The Programme Committee (PC) at its October 2011 session requested the Office of Evaluation (OED) conduct evaluations of FAO’s cooperation in middle income countries. Armenia, Sri Lanka and Viet Nam were completed by mid-2013.
In consideration of the widespread implementation of Country Programming Frameworks (CPF) in FAO, it was decided to carry out an additional evaluation of a middle income country in the Latin America and Caribbean region to allow for an in-depth analysis of the Organization’s achievements, strengths and weaknesses, with specific focus on the CPF process and usefulness as well as the priority areas identified within it. OED applies a set of socio-economic criteria relevant to FAO’s mandate, programme size and institutional arrangements to determine a short list of eligible countries for evaluation. The country in the region that best met the criteria above, as well as avoiding duplication with any past or on-going evaluations, was Colombia.
A multidisciplinary team will carry out the evaluation in the period July 2013-March 2014. The final report is expected in May 2014.
WFP and FAO jointly serve as Global Cluster Lead Agency for the Food Security Cluster. While some FSCC work existed at country level prior to the IASC decision to set up a Global Food Security Cluster at the end of 2010, more intensive support for this work has been ongoing since 2011 and, over the past three years, WFP and FAO have been investing increasing financial and human resources in FSC cluster coordination mechanisms both at country and global levels. Recently efforts have made to put in place a monitoring system for FSCC work – however to date no evaluation has sought to undertake a systematic, in-depth and independent assessment of the relevance and performance of food security coordination efforts and the role of the two agencies in supporting them. Toward this end, FAO and WFP’s EO will be undertaking a Joint Evaluation of Food Security Cluster Coordination during the last quarter of 2013 and first quarter 2014. Given the fact that FSC coordination work has only really been scaled up in the last years, a key objective of the evaluation is learning -> the evaluation results and recommendations will be focused on improving the effectiveness of the cluster work and will contribute to global FSC strategy development. The evaluation aims to generate credible evidence for results achieved or not achieved at country level by FSCs – and the role and contribution of the global FSC to these results. The evaluation will contribute the growing body of evaluative work on cluster coordination and to a wider assessment of the humanitarian reform process and implementation of the Transformative Agenda. Its main objective will be to assess, as systematically and objectively as possible, the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, connectedness, coverage and connectedness of Food Security Cluster Coordination efforts to date, at all levels. The evaluation report will be presented to the WFP Executive Board and the FAO Programme Committee during the 3rd quarter of 2014.
For further details kindly visit:
The Programme Committee at its session in March 2011, received the Evaluation of FAO’s Regional Office for the Near East. The Committee recommended that such evaluations should be conducted in other regions. Thus, FAO Office of Evaluation in 2012 carried out and completed a similar evaluation for Europe and Central Asia, and started the same exercise for Africa.
The two other regions, Asia and Pacific and Latin America and the Caribbean, have started in early 2013, to be completed by early 2014.
The Organization’s new impetus towards decentralization to better respond to Member Countries’ needs poses particular challenges to FAO’s current delivery model in the region and sub-regions. These evaluations aim at providing FAO Management and Member Countries with an evidence-based independent assessment of the progress made by the Organization in implementing the corporate decisions to decentralize its functions and roles to the region.
They will focus on the relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability of the decentralization process and will formulate recommendations to improve the corporate performance and function in the regions, as appropriate. The evaluations will include all work by FAO and all actions taken to implement the decentralization policy and process in the regions since 2004.
The Evaluations are expected to be finalized by January 2014 and discussed by the Programme Committee at its session in May 2014.
In September 2012, prompted by both FAO management and resource partners, OED launched the evaluation of FAO’s interventions in Somalia since 2007. It will examine the relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact and connectedness of FAO’s interventions in Somalia, including in particular FAO’s role in coordinating food security responses and efforts on capacity development. Specific attention will also be paid to the country’s original strategic planning frameworks and tools, including the new FAO, WFP and UNICEF joint Resilience Strategy 2012-2020. A multidisciplinary team, supported and integrated by OED, will carry out the evaluation in the period November- December 2012. The final report is expected for March 2013. For further details please contact the evaluation manager: firstname.lastname@example.org.