May
2000

LOCATION
AND MAIN LANDING PLACES
The
major fishing grounds in the Philippines are West Palawan waters, Sulu
Sea, Visayan Sea, Moro Gulf and others. These fishing grounds constitute
more than 64% of the total commercial fishing catch from 1992-1995. For
municipal fisheries, these areas including Bohol Sea contribute 41% of
fish catch, for the same period (Table 1).
Fish
catch from these major fishing grounds are landed in the different landing
ports strategically located nationwide. Table 2 shows the list
of fish landing areas, its location, total area and the estimated fish
unloading in metric tons in 1998. Navotas Fish Port Complex appears a
main landing site for marine and inland fisheries as well as aquaculture
commodities.
Table
1. Average production by major fishing grounds, Philippines, 1992-1995
|
Fishing
grounds
|
Average
(mt.)
|
%
Share
|
|
Commercial
West
Palawan Waters
South
Sulu Sea
Visayan
Sea
Moro
Gulf
Lamon
Bay
Bohol
Sea
East
Sulu Sea
International
waters
Samar
Sea
Guimaras
Strait
Manila
Bay
Tayabas
Bay
Sibuyan
Bay
Others
Municipal
Visayan
Sea
Bohol
Sea
East
Sulu
Moro
Gulf
Guimaras
Strait
South
Sulu Sea
West
Palawan Waters
Lamon
Bay
Leyte
Gulf
Samar
Sea
Davao
Gulf
Cuyo
Pass
Tayabas
Bay
Others
|
845,446
158,220
149,243
137,942
98,050
41,901
34,263
29,071
25,558
23,385
23,382
21,899
19,826
15,434
67,272
807,524
92,885
84,305
78,491
74,765
55,106
44,000
38,444
37,138
36,587
35,622
28,365
27,253
22,500
152,063
|
100.00
18.71
17.65
16.32
11.60
4.96
4.05
3.44
3.02
2.77
2.77
2.59
2.34
1.82
7.96
100.00
11.50
10.44
9.72
9.26
6.82
5.45
4.76
4.60
4.53
4.41
3.51
3.38
2.79
18.83
|
Table
2. List of Fish Landing Places
|
Fish
ports
|
Location
|
Total
area
|
Fish
landings (MT) (1998)
|
|
I.
Regional Fish Ports (PFDA)
|
|
|
|
|
1.
Navotas Fish Port Complex
|
North
Blvd.,Navotas, M Manila
|
47.60
Ha
|
239,248
|
|
2.
Iloilo Fish Port Complex
|
Barangay
Tanza, Iloilo City
|
21.00
Ha
|
26,434
|
|
3.
Zamboanga Fish Port Complex
|
Sangali,
Zamboanga City
|
12.50
Ha
|
16,085
|
|
4.
Lucena Fish Port Complex
|
Dalahican,
Lucena City
|
7.80
Ha
|
13,919
|
|
5.Camaligan
Fish Port Complex
|
Bgy.Dugcal,
Camaligan, Cam. Sur
|
1.60
Ha
|
N/A
|
|
6.
Sual Fish Port Complex
|
Bgy.
Poblacion Sual. Pangasinan
|
3.18
Ha
|
703
|
|
7.
Davao Fish Port Complex
|
Daliao,
Davao City
|
4.50
Ha
|
5,846
|
|
8.
General Santos Fish Port Complex
|
Bgy.
Tambler, General Santos City South Cotabato
|
11.00
Ha
|
9,309
|
|
II.
Municipal Fish Ports
|
|
|
|
|
A.
Joint Management by
PFDA and LGU
|
|
|
|
|
1.
Rosario Municipal Fish Port
|
Bgy.
Pandawan, Rosario, Cavite
|
8,623
m2
|
13,626
|
|
2.
Cardona Municipal Fish Port
|
Bgy.
Looc, Cardona, Rizal
|
3,232
m2
|
N/A
|
|
3.
Dipolog Municipal Fish Port
|
Bgy.
Barra Dipolog City,
|
4,044
m2
|
N/A
|
|
|
Zamboanga
del Norte
|
|
|
|
B.
Sole Management by LGU
|
|
|
|
|
1.
Tabaco Municipal Fish Port
|
Bgy.
Fatima, Tobaco, Albay
|
6,841
m2
|
768
|
|
2.
Bulan Municipal Fish Port
|
Zone
1. Bualn, Sorsogon
|
4,000
m2
|
*
5,286
|
|
3.
Orani Municipal Fish Port
|
Bgy.
Bago Pantalan, Orani, Bataan
|
7,200
m2
|
**
4,094
|
|
4.
Atimonan Municipal Fish Port
|
Bgy.
Poblacion, Atimonan, Quezon
|
5,250
m2
|
**
2,495
|
|
5.
Pilar Municipal Fish Port
|
Bgy.
Poblacion, Pilar Sorsogon
|
2,066
m2
|
N/A
|
|
6.
Mercedes Municipal Fish Port
|
Bgy.
5 Mercedes, Camarines Norte
|
11,900
m2
|
N/A
|
|
7.
Roxas City Municipal Fish Port
|
Bgy.
Labas Roxas Capiz
|
2,598
m2
|
9,933
|
|
8.
Sogod Municipal Fish Port
|
Sogod,
Southern Leyte
|
2,156
m2
|
N/A
|
|
9.
Estancia Municipal Fish Port
|
Bgy.
Poblacion, Estancia, Iloilo City
|
6,096
m2
|
**
2,828
|
|
10.
Castilla Municipal Fish Port
|
Malacaya
Castilla, Sorsogon
|
162
m2
|
N/A
|
|
|
Poblacion,
Castilla, Sorsogon
|
289
m2
|
N/A
|
|
11.
Casiguran Municipal Fish Port
|
Casiguran,Sorsogon
|
700
m2
|
N/A
|
|
12.
Jagna Municipal Fish Port
|
Jagna,
Bohol
|
781
m2
|
N/A
|
|
*
Until October 15, 1998 only.
|
|
|
|
|
**
1996 fish unloadings
|
|
|
|
FISHERIES
POLICIES AND PLANS
The
declared fisheries policies of the State under the Philippine Fisheries
Code of 1998 (Republic Act 8550) are:
-
To
achieve food security as the overriding consideration in the utilization,
management, development, conservation and protection of fishery resources
in order to provide the food needs of the population. A flexible policy
towards the attainment of food security shall be adopted in response
to changes in demographic trends for fish, emerging trends in the
trade of fish and other aquatic products in domestic and international
markets, and the law of supply and demand;
-
To
limit access to the fishery and aquatic resources of the Philippines
for the exclusive use and enjoyment of Filipino citizens;
-
To
ensure the rational and sustainable development, management and conservation
of the fishery and aquatic resources in Philippine waters including
the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) and in the adjacent high seas, consistent
with the primordial objective of maintaining a sound ecological balance,
protecting and enhancing the quality of the environment;
-
To
protect the rights of fisherfolk, especially of the local communities
with priority to municipal fisherfolk, in the preferential use of
the municipal waters. Such preferential use, shall be based on, but
not limited to, Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) or Total Allowable
Catch (TAC) on the basis of resources and ecological conditions, and
shall be consistent with our commitments under international treaties
and agreements;
-
To
provide support to the fishery sector, primarily to the municipal
fisherfolk, including women and youth sectors, through appropriate
technology and research, adequate financial, production, construction
of post-harvest facilities, marketing assistance, and other services.
The protection of municipal fisherfolk against foreign intrusion shall
extend to offshore fishing grounds. Fishworkers shall receive a just
share for their labor in the utilization of marine and fishery resources.
-
To
manage fishery and aquatic resources, in a manner consistent with
the concept of an integrated coastal area management in specific natural
fishery management areas, appropriately supported by research, technical
services and guidance provided by the State, and
-
To
grant the private sector the privilege to utilize fishery resources
under the basic concept that the grantee, licensee or permittee thereof
shall not only be a privileged beneficiary of the State but also an
active participant and partner of the government in the sustainable
development, management, conservation and protection of the fishery
and aquatic resources of the country.
Goals and objectives
The goals
and specific objectives of the Agrikulturang MakaMASA-Fisheries Program,
1999-2004 are to:
-
Contribute
to national food security at all times;
-
Ensure
the rational and sustainable development, management and conservation
of fishery and aquatic resources in Philippine waters including the
EEZ and adjacent high seas;
-
Reduce
poverty incidence in the coastal areas;andEnhance people empowerment
in the fisheries sector.
Specifically,
the objectives formulated under the Program seeks to:
-
Contribute
to national food security at all times;
-
Improve
aquaculture productivity within ecological limits;
-
Optimize
utilization of offshore fisheries and deep-sea resources;Improve
product quality and reduce post-harvest losses;
-
Provide
a favorable policy environment conducive to increased investment and
global competitiveness and people participation;
-
Conserve,
protect and sustain management of the country's fishery and aquatic
resources; and
-
Alleviate
poverty among municipal fisherfolk and provide supplementary livelihood.
Overall strategies
The overall
strategies as specified under the Program are to:
-
Produce
quality fish broodstock, seeds and fingerlings;
-
Promote
production-intensifying but cost reducing technologies within ecological
limits;
-
Improve
the production-marketing systems to become more efficient and effective;
-
Empower
local government units (LGUs) to assume primary responsibility for
food
security and resource management within their respective areas;
-
Provide
technical support for LGUs to help them attain the target yield;Develop
complementation and counterpart schemes with the LGUs;
-
Conserve
and protect the country's fisheries and aquatic resources;
-
Focus
national government support on strategic areas;Increase
in public investment particularly on post-harvest facilities;
-
Availment
of trade and fiscal incentives by the private sector.
-
Promote
fisherfolk organizations;and
-
Tap
the expertise of private/state universities and colleges (SUCs) in
accessing appropriate technologies, providing a forum for research-extension
linkages, and assisting in the evaluation of programs.
MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES, MEASURES AND ARRANGEMENTS FOR MAJOR FISHERIES
Municipal
fisheries
Under
the Philippine Fisheries Code of 1998, the municipality/city government
shall have jurisdiction over municipal waters and shall be responsible
for the management, conservation, protection, utilization and disposition
of all fish and fishery/aquatic resources within their respective municipal
waters, in consultation with the Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Management
Councils (FARMC). Therefore, the Local Government Units (LGUs) shall enforce
all fishery laws, rules and regulations as well as valid fishery ordinances
enacted by the municipality/city council. The LGUs shall maintain a registry
of municipal fisherfolk, who are fishing in municipal waters for the purpose
of determining priorities among them, or limiting entry into the municipal
waters and of monitoring fishing activities and/or other related purposes.
In addition, the LGU concerned can grant demarcated fishery rights to
fishery organizations/cooperative for mariculture operation. Consequently,
whenever it is determi ed by the LGUs and the Department of Agriculture
(DA) that a municipal water is overfished based on available data or information
or in danger of being overfished, the LGU shall prohibit or limit the
fishery activities in the said waters.
The
municipal or city government may through its local chief executive and
acting pursuant to an appropriate ordinance can authorize or permit small
and medium commercial fishing vessels to operate within the 10.1 to 15
km area from the shoreline in municipal waters provided but the following
are met: (a) no commercial fishing in municipal waters with depth less
than 7 fathoms; (b) fishing activities utilize methods and gears that
are determined to be consistent with national policies; (c) prior consultation,
through public hearing; and (d) the applicant vessel as well as ship owner,
employer, captain and crew have been certified.
The
major management and support mechanisms for the municipal waters include
the promotion of community-based coastal resource management program to
include delineation of the bay for exclusive use of municipal fisherfolk,
control of fishing effort in each bay to estimated yields, encouragement
of fisherfolk to enforce laws and involve LGUs, NGOs and communities in
management and awareness of coastal resources, regulation in specific
areas and provision of alternative livelihood projects. In addition, management
interventions include the protection of coral reefs and mangrove areas
by establishing artificial reefs, replanting of mangroves, establishment
of fish sanctuaries, establishment of closed areas and seasons for selected
gears, vessels and species.
Commercial
fisheries
The
principal tool for fisheries management is the licensing system, covering
both the license to fish and the license to operate fishing vessel. For
commercial fisheries, the registration, documentation, inspection and
manning of the operation of all types of fishing vessels plying Philippine
waters shall be in accordance with existing laws, rules and regulations.
The commercial fishing boat license shall be effective for 3 years and
the fishing gears that will be used in its commercial fishing operation
shall also be licensed.
Various
management efforts have been implemented for commercial fisheries in the
Philippines. These include management of payaos (fish attraction
devices), protection of juveniles and spawning grounds; regulation of
mesh size and the use of superlights, support fishing operations in international
waters and seek early resolution of issues on disputed fishing grounds
and territories.
Aquaculture
The
Philippine Fisheries Code of 1998 provides that public lands such as tidal
swamps, mangroves, marshes, foreshore lands and fishery operations shall
not be disposed or alienated. Fishpond lease agreement (FLA) may be issued
for public lands that may be declared available for fishpond development
primarily to qualified fisherfolk cooperatives/ associations.
In
addition, the DA shall declare a reservation, portions of available public
lands as suitable for fishpond purposes for fish sanctuary, conservation
and ecological purposes. Fish-pens, fish cages, fish traps and other structures
for the culture of fish and other fishery products shall be constructed
and shall operate only within established zones designated by the LGUs
in consultation with FARMCs after corresponding license have been secured.
However, no fish-pens or fish cages or fish traps shall be allowed in
lakes after 2 001. Consequently, pearl culture, all fish hatcheries, fish
breeding facilities and private fishponds must be registered with the
LGUs.
PRESENT ROLE OF FISHERIES IN THE NATIONAL ECONOMY
The
Philippines is an important producer of fish in the world, ranking 13th
among the 51 top fish producing countries in 1996, with its total production
of about 1.8 million metric tons, or a share of 1.9 % to the total world
catch of 94.625 million metric tons.
Although
not a dominant player in the national economy, fisheries is nevertheless
an important sector, with its contribution of US$ 1.8 billion, 2.7% percent
to the country's Gross National Product (GNP) of US$ 68.2 billion at current
prices in 1998. It also provides employment to about 1 million or 5 %
of the total labor force.
The
average annual growth rate achieved by the Philippine fisheries from 1989-1998
was 1.8 percent. Positive growths were recorded in aquaculture, 4.7 percent
and commercial fisheries, 4.4 percent, but municipal fisheries declined
by 2.3 percent. The production was mainly contributed by aquaculture fisheries,
34.3 percent, followed by commercial fisheries, 33.7 percent and municipal
fisheries, 32 percent in 1998.
ROLE OF THE NON GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATIONS (NGOs)
AND THE PRIVATE SECTOR
The
Philippine government recognizes NGOs as partners on development works,
especially in gaining greater involvement of the people on decision making,
planning and implementation of programs. These private organizations committed
to the task of socioeconomic development were established primarily to
render service to coastal communities. Together with the coastal community,
projects responsive to the people's needs are identified, formulated and
local capabilities built up. Through the NGOs, invaluable assistance is
also rendered by conducting technical training covering resource management,
self-regulation and occupational diversification programs.
On
the other hand, the role of the private sector in fisheries management
and development is very important in the Philippines. It is stated in
the national policies that the government shall grant the private sector
the privilege to utilize the fishery resources at the same time serve
as active participant and partner of the Government in the sustainable
development, management, conservation and protection of the fishery and
aquatic resources of the country. This is to promote people empowerment
in the fishery sector and ensure profitability of effort especially among
our small-scale fisherfolk.
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN THE REGION
The Philippines
through the BFAR is an active member and signatory to various regional
and international bodies concerned in fisheries management and development,
such as:
-
Association
of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) concerned to have one body for
mutual cooperation and brotherhood among member nations. For the fisheries
cooperation, they aim to promote food security and sustainable development
of fisheries through greater collaboration with other concerned regional
and international organizations.
-
Southeast
Asian Fisheries Development Center (SEAFDEC) concerned to promote
fisheries development among member countries in the Southeast Asian
Region. The four departments of SEAFDEC are concerned with Marine
Capture Fisheries Training (Thailand), Marine Fisheries Research (Singapore),
Aquaculture Research (Philippines), and Marine Fishery Resource Development
and Management (Malaysia).
-
The
Brunei Darussalam, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines' East ASEAN Growth
Area (BIMP-EAGA) is an economic growth area which aims to intensify
economic cooperation. The area is resource-rich and presents vast
opportunities for investments, tourism and trade. Its major concern
is to create broad avenues for private sector to participate, facilitate
the freer movement of people, goods and services in order to stimulate
the sub-regional economy by rapidly expanding its market and resource
base as well as share common infrastructure and national resources.
-
The
Asia-Pacific Fishery Commission (APFIC), formerly titled the Indo-Pacific
Fisheries Council (IPFC) concerned in assisting its member countries
to achieve accelerated fisheries development and management. The Commission
has played significant role and serves as source of inspiration and
guidance, influencing the member countrie's national fisheries development
policies and planning.
-
The
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) served as primary regional
vehicle for promoting open trade and practical economic cooperation.
This organization aims to sustain the growth and development of the
region for the common good of its peoples and, in this way, to contribute
to the growth and development of the world economy as well as to enhance
the positive gains both for the region and the world economy, resulting
from increasing economic interdependence, to include encouraging the
flow of goods, services, capital and technology.
The
Philippines receives technical assistance in the fisheries sector from
Japan, Australia, Canada, the United States and others. United Nation
agencies (FAO, UNDP) have also been involved in providing technical services
and support to Philippine's fisheries sector.
INVESTMENTS
IN FISHERIES
There
is no adequate information available on private investments in the Philippine
fisheries sector. However, based on the Philippine Fisheries Code and
the fisheries sector plan, massive investments are urgently needed by
the public and private sector, at all aspects of the fisheries industry
including production, harvesting, processing, marketing, research and
extension. For the year 2000, the national government proposed a budget
for the fisheries sector (Table 3).
Table
3. Proposed BFAR Budget, CY 2000
|
Component
|
Year
2000
(US$)
|
|
I
Regular Activities
II
MakaMASA-FISHERIES
a.
Fisheries Production
b.
Post-Harvest and Infrastructure
c.
Training & Technology Transfer
d.
Fisheries Information and Marketing Support
e.
R & D in Fisheries
f.
Program Organization and Management
g.
Conservation and Management
III
Foreign Assisted Projects
|
472,406
926,585
114,619
116,061
250,194
11,225
54,025
296,951
83,510
495,432
|
MAIN FISHERIES
REGULATIONS
In
February 25, 1998, the Republic Act 8550 was enacted into law, entitled
"An Act Providing for the Development, Management and Conservation of
the Fisheries and Aquatic Resources, Integrating All Laws Pertinent Thereto
and for Other Purposes", otherwise known as the Philippine Fisheries Code
of 1998. This law took effect on March 23, 1998. The Code aims to achieve
food security as the overriding consideration in the utilization, management,
development, conservation and protection of fishery resources in order
to provide the food needs of the population as well as to limit access
to the fishery resources of the Philippines for the exclusive use and
enjoyment of the Filipino people.
PROJECTED DEMAND AND SUPPLY
The
most recent forecasts (Bernacsek, 1996) on per caput food fish supply
trend projection (Table 4) indicate that assuming that the observed recent
trend for per caput food fish supply to decline at an average rate of
22.4% per annum continues into the future (Fig. 3), per caput supply would
decline to 19.31 kg/person by 2010 (compared to 28.48 kg/person in 1994).
This is equivalent to a total food fish supply of 1,813,000 tons, given
a population of 93.9 million. Assuming that the shares of domestic production
and imports in total food fish supply remain constant at the 1994 ratio
(95.8% and 4.2%, respectively), domestic production for consumption of
1,737,000 tons would be required to support this level of per caput supply.
The 1994 level of domestic production for consumption was 1,873,000 tons,
which is 7.8% higher than the 2010 requirement. Such a development would
only come about if there was a massive shift away from fish as a source
of dietary animal protein.
On
the sustainable scenario, he indicated that assuming that all positive
interventions in the fisheries sector are successful, domestic production
of food fish rise to 2,220,000 tons by 2010. The per caput food fish supply
could thus be 24.69 kg/person, and would require an import quantity (97,000
tons) only moderately higher than the 1994 level. On the other hand, he
also mentioned the unsustainable scenario wherein assuming there are no
positive interventions in the fisheries sector, and current trends of
resource depletion and environmental degradation continue, domestic production
of food fish might fall as low as 940,000 tons by 2010. The per caput
food fish supply would decline to 10.45 kg/person.
Table
4. Projections of per caput food fish supply in year 2010
|
Year
|
Supply
estimation
|
Population
|
Domestic
food
fish
Production
(tons)
|
Food
fish
import
requirement
(tons)
|
Total
food
fish
supply
(tons)
|
Per
caput
food
fish
supply
(kg/person)
|
|
1994
|
Domestic
production plus imports
|
68,624,000
|
1,872,548
|
82,138
|
1,954,686
|
28.48
|
|
2010
|
Projection
of 1994 per caput supply level
|
93,874,000
|
1,736,573
|
76,134
|
1,812,707
|
19.31
|
|
|
(assuming
-2.4% annual decline)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
Sustainable
scenario
|
93,874,000
|
2,220,000
|
97,328
|
2,317,328
|
24.69
|
|
2010
|
Unsustainable
scenario
|
93,874,000
|
940,000
|
41,211
|
981,211
|
10.45
|
Note: It
is assumed that the share of imports in total supply remains constant
at the 1994 level of 4.2%
ORGANISATIONAL
STRUCTURE
OF THE NATIONAL FISHERIES AUTHORITY
The
Department of Agriculture (DA) through the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic
Resources (BFAR) has responsibility for the fisheries sector (Fig. 1).
Under the Philippine Fisheries Code of 1998, the BFAR as a reconstituted
line bureau under the DA and created the position of Undersecretary for
Fisheries and Aquatic Resources solely for the purpose of attending to
the needs of the fishing industry.
BFAR,
as a line bureau is headed by a Director and assisted by two Assistant
Directors who shall supervise the administrative and technical services
of the bureau, respectively. The Bureau have 11 Divisions, 8 National
Technology Centers, 7 Regional Fisheries Training Centers, 15 Regional
Fisheries Offices with Provincial Fisheries Offices, strategically located
nationwide (Fig. 2).
(please
click to enlarge images)
Figure
1. Organizational Structure DA and BFAR

Figure
2. Organisational Structure-BFAR
|