عربي
English
Español
Français
中文
Русский
 
 

Determine the operational objectives for each of the issues requiring direct management

After identifying which of the issues (of an ecological, social, economic or institutional nature) requires specific management intervention, the next step is to clearly determine what management outcomes are to be achieved.  This requires the generation of clear and measurable operational objectives for each of the priority issues.

An operational objective is the translation of the relevant social values, high level objectives, policy statements and standing legislation etc. (identified in the scoping phase) into a form that has a direct and practical interpretation for the management of the fishery.  They need to be outcome-based and can best be described by answering–“What specifically for this issue do you want the fishery to achieve and why?”.

They should clearly describe the expected outcome of management (e.g. maintain the biomass at levels that can generate MSY) they must be ‘measurable’ using either quantitative or qualitative indicators and potentially ‘auditable’.  In cases where an issue (e.g. a depleted target stock) involves multiple objectives (e.g. increase biomass levels to MSY but still contribute to food security) that can potentially be in conflict (it would be difficult to increase the biomass without first reducing the removals and therefore potentially impact on food security), it will be necessary to determine the order of priority and timeframe for achieving success.
Operational objectives should therefore be developed in consultation with stakeholders because they define precisely what the management plan is designed to achieve and therefore what fishing and other arrangements may need to change.

It is recognised that it can sometimes be difficult to develop operational objectives without also needing to identify the relevant indicator and performance level as these form a package.  It may, therefore, be more practical in many cases to combine key Activities 3.1 and 3.2 as a single process. 

Relevant questions

For each issue you are going to directly manage:

  • What are the high level management objectives relevant to this issue and what specifically does this mean the fishery should be trying to achieve for this issue?
  • Are any of the outcomes for the issue in conflict with each other, if so what is the order of priority?
  • Is there stakeholder agreement on what are the outcomes that should be targeted? 
  • Can the outcome be measured either by quantitative or qualitative methods?
  • Are the agreed set of operational objectives and outcomes for the issue still consistent with the high level objectives, other policies, treaties legislation etc.?

Key activities

  • For each issue requiring direct management, identify possible operational objectives.
  • If there is more than one operational objective for an issue determine their hierarchy or relative priority.
  • Obtain stakeholder input/advice on their appropriateness and practicality  
  • Review operational objectives to ensure they are consistent with high level objectives, legislation/policies
  • Confirm the set of operational objectives that will be used for developing the management system.

Tools

As the operational objectives for a fishery will relate to the specific circumstances in that area, there are not many direct tools to assist with this activity.  Examples of EAF based operational objectives have been collated from the numerous case studies that have been completed for various fisheries.  These cover each of the categories of EAF issues (e.g. retained species, the ecosystem, social issues, economics, governance) and these examples may be useful to assist in finding the right objective, or at least identify a starting point.

The process of determining operational objectives may generate some conflict if there are disagreements among stakeholders about what is trying to be achieved; therefore the consultation tools related to conflict resolution may be required.

The selection criteria for this tool is given in the table below.

Tools and information sources

Selection criteria

Difficulty

Cost

Capacity

Know.

Participation

Time

Examples of operational objectives for EAF Easy L L L M S

L= Low or Long; H= High; M= Medium, S=Short

 


  Back to Step 3       Forward to Activity 3.2 

 
Powered by FIGIS