Decentralization - case studies

Decentralisation in Bolivia: a success story for the poor. (available at http://www.oneworld.net/external/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.id21.org%2Fsociety%2Fs8bjpf1g1.html.)
Since 1994 Bolivia has undergone a dramatic process of political decentralisation. Recent research has analysed this decentralisation process and argues that it has made the Bolivian government more responsive to the needs of the poor by redirecting public investment to areas of greatest need.
Center for International Forestry Research. L'exploitation forestière illégale en Indonésie: un inquuiétant processus de légalisation. Center for International Forestry Research. (available at http://bft.cirad.fr/pdf/obibft270.pdf.)
La mise en �uvre de l�autonomie régionale a investi les autorités locales du pouvoir d�attribuer de petites concessions forestières aux communautés indigènes. Les gouvernements locaux ne sont plus disposés à se conformer aux injonctions du gouvernement central. Aujourd�hui, il est clair que le ministère des Forêts a perdu le contrôle de la ressource forestière.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Descentralización. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (available at http://www.rlc.fao.org/prior/recnat/recursos/bosques/fttp.htm.)
Los gobiernos centrales de muchos países han emprendido un proceso de descentralización de responsabilidades y poder decisional en las instituciones provinciales y municipales. Sin embargo, en ciertos casos tal descentralización no incluye la transferencia completa de los recursos financieros correspondientes.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Gender and Decentralisation: Promoting Women's Participation in Local Councils. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (available at http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/003/X6090E/X6090E00.HTM.)
From a gender perspective, decentralisation of a Public Administration opens up new possibilities to stimulate women's participation in local decision making processes. This case study highlights lessons learned from a
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Unasylva - No. 199 - Decentralization and Devolution in Forestry. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (available at http://www.fao.org/docrep/x3030e/x3030e00.htm.)
This issue of Unasylva examines a number of topics related to the redistribution of authority and power for forests and forestry.
International Council on Human Rights. Decentralisation in Uganda Today: Institutions and Relations. (available at http://www.ichrp.org/ac/excerpts/89.doc.)
Uganda is one of the several countries around the world, pursuing the policy of decentralisation as one pillar of public sector reform. Accordingly, the policy was designed to devolve powers and responsibilities for administration, planning and finance to the local levels where people can also participate in the decision making of their respective areas.
International Development Department. Local Government Decision-Making: Citizen Participation Local Accountability, Examples of Good (and Bad) Practice in Kenya. International Development Department. (available at http://www.grc-exchange.org/info_data/record.cfm?id=244.)
In this briefing paper, Nick Devas explores the scope for citizens� involvement in decision-making and for government accountability to its residents, in order for lasting improvements to be achieved. Case studies from seven Kenyan local authorities provide some practical guidelines as to what constitutes �good� or �bad� practice in local government, some of which may be transferable to other contexts.
Overseas Development Institute. Devolution and community-based natural resource management: creating space for local people to participate and benefit?. Overseas Development Institute. (available at http://www.eldis.org/cf/search/disp/docdisplay.cfm?doc=DOC5803&resource=Default.)
This paper draws together evidence from a number of studies on the impacts of natural resource devolution policies in several Asian and southern African countries from the perspective of local people. Devolution outcomes are assessed in terms of who has greater benefits and decision-making authority. Factors that have influenced the devolution process are also examined.
Overseas Development Institute. Does decentralisation harm the poor? Lessons from forestry in Indonesia, and West and Central Africa. Overseas Development Institute. (available at http://www.odi.org.uk/speeches/envgov2002/meeting3.html.)
Is Decentralisation Good for the Environment? Some Reflections on Power Transfer and Institutional Choice. Is decentralisation good for the environment and poverty? Lessons from the forestry sector in Indonesia.
Overseas Development Institute. Local actors, powers and accountability in african decentralizations: a review of issues. Overseas Development Institute. (available at http://www.odi.org.uk/speeches/envgov2002/ribot/Ribot_local_actors.pdf.)
The review draws on the environmental decentralization literature, on cases from other sectors and on theoretical discussions of decentralization. The literature reveals a lack of systematic comparative research characterizing decentralizations or explaining their origins and outcomes. The review identifies opportunities and tension in current reforms and outlines research priorities.
UK Department for International Development. Can decentralisation promote pro-poor development planning systems?. UK Department for International Development. (available at http://www.id21.org/society/s8ath1g1.html.)
Can development planning close the gap between high level strategic thinking and the local level context? How can national poverty reduction strategy papers (PRSPs) complement the decentralisation of development functions?
World Bank. Participation and Accountability at the Periphery: Democratic Local Governance in Six Countries. World Bank. (available at http://www.grc-exchange.org/info_data/record.cfm?id=669.)
This comparative study shows how democratic governance has improved representation and participation but that these often had no real effect on empowerment, equity or poverty reduction. The reason for this is that vulnerable groups are generally too weakly organised to turn their needs into effective demands, and accountability mechanisms are too poorly developed to ensure that demands are realised.
World Resources Institute. Democratic Decentralization of Natural Resources: Institutionalizing Popular Participation Institutionalizing Popular Participation. World Resources Institute. (available at http://pdf.wri.org/ddnr_full_revised.pdf.)
This brief presents preliminary findings and recommendations from research on natural resources in decentralization efforts around the world. The findings derive from WRI's Accountability, Decentralization, and Environment Comparative Research Project in Africa, and cases presented at the WRI-organized Conference on Decentralization and Environment.
World Resources Institute. Environment, livelihoods and local institutions: Decentralization in Mainland Southeast Asia. World Resources Institute. (available at http://www.eldis.org/cf/search/disp/docdisplay.cfm?doc=DOC9831&resource=Default.)
This report provides an overview of the decentralisation of natural resources decision-making and management in mainland Southeast Asia during the past 20 years. It is based upon seven in-depth case studies from Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, and Yunnan, China and comparative material from ongoing collaborative work with partners in Northern Thailand. The authors identify findings about the opportunities and risks of decentralisation that are specific to these case studies and highlight common themes in the design and implementation of decentralisation reforms across the region.
World Resources Institute. La Descentralización Democrática de los Recursos Naturales: La Institucionalización de la Participación Popular. World Resources Institute. (available at http://pdf.wri.org/ddnr_spanish.pdf.)
La descentralización democrática es un manera prometedora de institucionalizar y de aumentar la participación popular, que hace que sea eficaz la gestión participativa de los recursos naturales basada en la comunidad. Sin embargo, la mayoría de las actuales reformas de descentralización se caracterizan por una insuficiente transferencia de poderes hacia las instituciones locales, bajo la estricta fiscalización del gobierno central.
World Resources Institute. La décentralisation démocratique des ressources naturelles: institutionnaliser la participation populaire. World Resources Institute. (available at http://www.sanrem.uga.edu/sanrem/database/pdf/DemocraticDecentralizationFrench.pdf.)
Ce dossier présente les premières conclusions et recommandations provenant de la recherche sur les efforts de décentralisation à travers le monde en matière de ressources naturelles. Ces conclusions proviennent du programme de recherche comparée de l�Institut des Ressources Mondiales sur la responsabilité, la décentralisation, et l�environnement en Afrique.
last updated: Wednesday, October 26, 2005