Agricultural Land contracts should be made available to farm workers in responsible and functional increments, useful territories by both private owners and by government land portions.
A positive permaculture and nature conscious movement of agriculture is both very positive to our green world and can also be the cure to many social problems, health crisis and poverty.
Education and agro-redesign directives in such a contract should be very considerate of cattle and livestock maxims per portion of land, that should not be cleared completely as is currently practiced.
Education about chemical agriculture, and the many harms from it, should be attatched to contract documents.
Converting cattle land to permaculture (multipurpose) contracts should be made most available, there should be tax break incentives to those implementing sustainable ecology and systems as it is a win win for all involved, including the cows and the greater health of everything.
The most important opportunity I see, while the FAO is drawing a useful contract set(s) for land use agricultural, that certain contracts be made for poor individuals and families, with no money to start a sustainable land development, that will use zero chemicals, utilizing all natural organic farming techniques. Possibly the mere existence of this contract standard could motivate what is needed to see the new future phases of organic natural, agricultural abundance potential take hold.
Agricultural Land Investment Contracts (ALIC) also have the opportunity to mandate a 50 / 50 % split of ownership, or 100 percent ownership of 50% of the land, etc., to lands developed agriculturally within the model of sustainable organic nature, to give security to those who tend the farm using the natural methods.
Appropriations of Federal and Nation Lands should be made available for this purpose, as a way of diversifying the assets, especially in cases of clearing and fires. This can motivate a rapid response to the casualty itself, and work as a deterrent to those who may purposely see acreage burned. For example is if x amount of natural disaster acreage could be claimed by one person's name, to be used specifically in an all natural permaculture or the like method, of reforestation, we would be then working in nature so much so to take advantage of the massive ash carbon infusions to soil.
Specifications such as how much livestock is permitted per acre, can be set.
Job creation incentives should be there for governments' also the private sector to consider, such as a Reforestation & Resource Protection officials who have the power to enforce livestock limits and chemical / GMO free small family agriculture.
Private land reserve investment can motivate wildlife and ecosystem security also, and this is the perfect conscious effort for wealthy people and companies.
Certain Species can be recommended to certain geographies and ideas like rotational re-visit style permaculture through a named resource link.
I sincerely hope that the committee can take into account these opportunities while drafting up their Agricultural Land Investment Contracts.
Please also see, best diet information, to help emphasis the optimal human health benefits that come with permaculture investment. This information is also important in fueling individual motivation towards better, all natural agricultural systems.
M. Brandon Eisler