1.1 Economic and Social Impact of Millet
1.4 Secondary and derived product
1.5 Requirements for Export and Quality Assurance
Millets represent a collective term referring to a number of small-seeded annual grasses that are cultivated as grain crops, primarily on marginal lands in dry areas of temperate, subtropical and tropical regions. They are regarded as a subsistence product and generally looked upon as a famine crop for the poor.
The statistical documentation for millet is generally poorer and more fragmented than that for rice and wheat despite its nutritional superiority. It may not come as a surprise to note that some scientists may not differentiate millets from sorghum. Some may be even astonished to learn how vast and variable are the millet species and varieties.
Postharvest operations, such as threshing, drying, cleaning, packaging, storage, processing and transportation are as significant. This comprises the second half of activities following pre-harvest operations. Therefore, these are crucial processes in the whole food chain for millet production.
As stated before, documentation of the post-harvest operations for millet is not as rich in content as other cereals. The purpose of this chapter is to add to the scanty information on millets with the eventual aim of providing facts on this often neglected yet consequential cereal crop.
Millet is a cereal crop plant belonging to the grass family, Graminae (FAO, 1972). The term "millet" is used loosely to refer to several types of small seeded annual grasses (FAO and ICRISAT, 1996), belonging to species under the five genera in the tribe Paniceae, namely Panicum, Setaria, Echinochloa, Pennisetum and Paspalum, and one genus, Eleusine, in the tribe Chlorideae (FAO, 1972). Most of the genera are widely distributed throughout the tropics and subtropics of the world (de Wet, 1987). The genus Pennisetum for example, includes about 140 species, some of which are domesticated and some are growing in the wilderness.
Millets are small grained cereals, the smallest of which include kodo, foxtail, proso (common millet), little and barnyard millets (Rao, 1989). They are the staple food of the millions inhabiting the arid and semi-arid tropics of the world, and are distributed in most of the Asian and African countries and parts of Europe.
According to Dendy (1995) the most important millets are pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum), finger millet (Eleusine coracona), proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) and foxtail millet (Stalia italica). But according to FAO (1972) and Hulse et al., (1980), the most important cultivated millet species are: pearl Millet (Pennisetum typhoides), also known as bulrush millet; proso millet (Panicum miliaceum), also known as common millet; foxtail millet (Setaria italica); Japanese barnyard millet (Echinochloa crusgalli var. Frumentacea or E. colona (Sawa)); finger millet (Eleusine coracona) also known as birds food millet or African millet; and kodo millet of India (Paspalum scorbiculatum).
Other millets include little millet (Panicum sumatrense), tef millet (Eargrostis tef) and Fonio millet (Digitaria exilis and D. iburua) (Dogget, 1989). The various types of millets, their food values and comparison are shown in Tables 1 and 2.
|
Name of millet |
Moisture |
Protein |
Carbohydrate |
Fat |
Fibre |
Mineral |
Calcium |
Phosphorus |
Calorific value (100g) |
(Eleucine coracona) |
13.0 |
8.0 |
72.0 |
1.3 |
3.0 |
2.70 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
332 |
|
11.1 |
13.71 |
72.26 |
1.76 |
0.10 |
1.07 |
0.01 |
0.2 |
341 |
(Setaria italica) |
11.9 |
9.7 |
72.4 |
3.5 |
1.0 |
1.5 |
0.04 |
0.3 |
353 |
|
11.1 |
13.4 |
72.3 |
1.8 |
0.10 |
1.1 |
0.02 |
0.3 |
360 |
(Paspalum scrobiculatum) |
11.6 |
10.6 |
59.2 |
4.2 |
10.2 |
4.4 |
0.04 |
0.3 |
346 |
(Eragrostis tef) |
11.2 |
9.1 |
74.3 |
2.2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
(Echnochloa frumentacea) |
11.9 |
6.2 |
65.5 |
2.2 |
9.8 |
4.4 |
- |
- |
- |
(Digitalis exilis) |
6.0 |
8.7 |
81.0 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
2.1 |
- |
- |
- |
(Oryza sativa) |
13.2 |
7.5 |
76.7 |
1.0 |
0.3 |
1.6 |
0.01 |
0.17 |
348 |
Source: Ponnuthurai, 1989.
|
Attribute/millet |
Pearl |
Finger |
Foxtail |
Proso |
Japanese |
Fonio |
Kodo |
Tef |
Seed type |
Caryopsis |
Utrical |
Caryopsis |
Utrical |
& |
Caryopsis |
& .. |
Caryopsis |
Kernel wt1 000 kernels |
7.8 |
2.3 |
2.0 |
6.1 |
& .. |
0.5 |
& .. |
0.8 |
Testa (layers)Pigmented Thickness |
1 Sometimes 0.4 |
5 Yes 10.8X24.2 |
Remnant & .. & . |
1 No 0.2-0.4 |
& .. & .. & . |
1 No 0.5-1.5 |
& .. & . & .. |
1 No 1.5-2.0 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
None |
1 |
|
Starch granules |
6.4-12.0 |
8.0-21.0 |
5-25 |
1.3-17 |
2.5-20 |
6.5-7.8 |
7-15 |
5.6-22.4 |
|
Starch type granule |
Simple |
Compound simple |
Simple |
Simple |
& . |
Simple |
Simple |
Compound simple |
|
Waxy type |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
No |
No |
|
Protein body size (mm) |
0.6-1.2 |
2.0 |
1-2 |
0.5-2.5 |
& . |
1.2-1.4 |
& . |
1.2-1.4 |
|
Germ size (LXW) |
1420 X 620 |
980X270 |
& ... |
1100X977 |
& . |
517X977 |
& . |
160X725 |
|
Endorsperm-germ ratio |
2.5:1 |
11:1 |
& . |
12:1 |
& . |
6:1 |
& . |
3:1 |
Source: Compiled by Saldivar and Rooney (1995) from various sources.
|
Component |
Whole grain (%) |
Endosperm (%) |
Germ (%) |
Pericarp (%) |
|
Whole kernel |
100 |
75.1 |
16.5 |
8.4 |
|
Protein |
13.3 |
10.9 |
24.5 |
17.1 |
|
Fat |
6.3 |
0.5 |
32.2 |
5.0 |
|
Ash |
1.7 |
0.3 |
7.2 |
3.2 |
|
Essential |
|
|
|
|
|
Phe |
5.5 |
5.5 |
4.4 |
4.3 |
|
Ile |
3.1 |
3.1 |
2.1 |
2.4 |
|
Leu |
9.6 |
11.2 |
6.5 |
7.1 |
|
Lys |
3.0 |
1.4 |
5.2 |
4.4 |
|
Met |
2.3 |
2.6 |
1.8 |
1.6 |
|
Thr |
3.6 |
3.3 |
3.9 |
4.7 |
|
Val |
3.9 |
3.9 |
3.6 |
3.5 |
|
Non-essential |
|
|
|
|
|
Asp |
8.8 |
8.1 |
11.4 |
11.4 |
|
Glu |
19.6 |
22.8 |
15.1 |
13.5 |
|
Ala |
8.2 |
9.4 |
8.0 |
8.7 |
|
Arg |
4.8 |
2.0 |
9.0 |
5.0 |
|
Gly |
3.3 |
1.9 |
6.1 |
7.3 |
|
Pro |
6.4 |
8.0 |
5.0 |
6.8 |
|
Ser |
5.2 |
5.2 |
5.7 |
5.6 |
|
Tyr |
3.8 |
3.6 |
4.0 |
4.7 |
Source: Saldivar and Rooney, 1995.
Pearl millet
The development and structure of pearl millet is similar to that of sorghum, with some exceptions. Pearl millet is an erect, short-day (Dave, 1987) annual grass that tillers more profusely than sorghum. Tillering is primarily from basal nodes, and the number of tillers varies considerably in different varieties. Branches may also arise from other nodes, each branch terminating in to an inflorescence. The inflorescence of pearl millet is a panicle, cylindrical in nature, broadest at the middle and slightly tapering towards both apex and base. The length as well as thickness of the panicle varies between 0.20 to 0.45 m long.
The leaves of pearl millet are generally smaller than those of sorghum, 90 to 100 cm in length, and 5 to 8 cm in width. The stem, on the average is thinner than that of sorghum (1 to 3 cm in diameter). The panicles are long and cylindrical, ranging from 15 cm to 1 m in length and 2 to 5 cm in width. At maturity, the stem tends to be woodier than that of sorghum (House et al., 1995).
Plant heights range from 1.2 to 3.5 m, depending on dwarfing genes (House et al., 1995) and on the environmental factors (such as climate, soil type, etc). Roots are fibrous with the main root being thin, small and quickly replaced in function by adventitious roots. The stem is round to oval, with flat, cordate leaf blades, of 0.75 m or more in length and 0.05 to 0.07 m wide (FAO, 1972).
Pearl millet is adapted to hot climates, and is even more resistant to drought than sorghum (Dave, 1987). No other cereal crop grows so well in hot dry regions like pearl millet. It yields reasonably well on poor sandy soils on which most other crops fail.
Pearl millet takes about 80 to 100 days to mature, but some varieties may mature earlier. It is primarily cross-pollinating, as stigmas emerge one to three days before the anthers (protogynous) and therefore have opportunity to be cross-pollinated. The seeds are one third to one half the size of that of sorghum, and tend to be more elongated and tear shaped. Spikelets can be bristled (awned) but in most varieties, there are no awns (House et al., 1995).
Pearl millet is the most widely grown of all the millet species (FAO, 1972). It is grown on an estimated 27 million hectares, followed by finger millet (Singh et al., 1987, quoted by Saldivar and Rooney1995). World production of millets has been stable during the last "decade", because it is mainly cultivated as a subsistence crop. In 1991, 37.1 million ha were sown, with an average yield of 781 kg/ha, totalling 28.9 million metric tonnes (FAO, 1992, quoted by Saldivar and Rooney, 1995). Thirty percent of the production was harvested in Africa, 56 percent in Asia and 13 percent in the former USSR. Major producers were India (31.1 percent), China (15.8) percent and the former USSR (12.4 percent) (Saldivar and Rooney, 1995)
Pearl millet is the major millet grown in Africa (Spencer and Sivakumar, 1987) and it is the fourth most important cereal food crop grown in India (Harinarayana, 1987).
|
COUNTRY |
SYNONYMS GIVEN |
|
USA |
Pearl millet, cattail millet, Pencillaria, Mands forage plant |
|
INDIA |
Bajra, bajri, sajje, cumbu |
|
AFRICA |
Sanio, gero, babala, nyoloti, burlush millet, dukhn, souna. |
|
EUROPE |
Candle millet, dark millet. |
Source: FAO, 1972.
It is believed that pearl millet was first domesticated in India and then moved to Africa, but most of the earlier scientists believed that Africa is the centre of origin of pearl millet and that it was introduced to India from Africa (Vavilov, 1951 quoted by FAO, 1972).
In India, pearl millet is the fourth most important food crop (Harinarayana, 1986)
Pearl millet is the most important cereal crop in arid and semi-arid regions of the world, and is grown most widely in India (Dave, 1987). As a semi-arid and arid crop, pearl millet is traditionally a component of the dryland system, usually grown in soils with depleted fertility which receive 150 - 750 mm of rainfall per year (Harinarayana, 1987).
Nutritionally superior to rice and wheat (Harinarayana, 1987, Seetharam et al., 1989) pearl millet is commonly used to make unleavened bread, thin or thick porridge or may be cooked like rice. The chemical composition of pearl millet and its anatomical parts are shown in Table 3.
The major factors that restrict the production potential of pearl millet are low hybrid coverage, slow varietal spread, poor plant establishment, no fertilizer, weeds (such as Striga spp) and diseases (such as downy mildew) and pests (such as grain-eating birds) (Harinarayana, 1987).
Pearl millet has been given different names in various countries of the world (Table 4).
Constituents of pearl millet grain
The structure of a mature caryopsis of pearl millet is shown in Figure 1. It is very small, weighing between 3-15 g/1 000 kernels (as compared to 5-80 g/1 000 kernels in sorghum).
Figure 1: Schema of Pearl Millet Seed Structure. (Source: Rooney and McDonough, 1987)
The typical seed (kernel) of pearl millet is a caryopsis similar in structural components to sorghum. Kernel shape, size and appearance (colour) vary significantly among pearl millet varieties, and within a sample, kernels vary significantly in size and shape (Rooney and McDonough, 1987). They are 3-4 mm long and 2.25 mm wide, usually yellowish-grey or steel-grey in colour, but varieties are known which have pearly-white or yellow grains (FAO, 1972) The appearance of pearl millet inflorescence is shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2:Pearl millet inflorescence.
Finger millet
Among the millets of the world, finger millet (Eleusine coracona) ranks fourth, after pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum L.), foxtail millet (Setaria italica), and proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) (Gupta, et al., 1989). Finger millet is the most widely grown small millet in the world (see definition of small millets under Section 2.8.3).
Finger millet, also known as ragi in India (Hulse et al., 1980) is a highly tillering annual grass, whose average height is a little over 1.0 m, but can reach as high as 1.6 m. Tillers come from the base of the plant and axillary buds along the stem (House et al., 1995). Each tiller produces a panicle. Leaves are generally 30 to 40 cm long, but can reach 70 cm and are narrow (1.5 to 3 cm). Panicle branches commonly come from the same place giving a finger like appearance (Figure 3). The number of branches ranges from 4 to 19; they can be straight (3 to 10 cm long) or they can be curved like a hand with fingers partially closed (hence the name finger millet). Seeds are formed in florets generally arranged in two rows along the panicle branch. The seeds are generally dark brown, red brown or purple, although light brown and cream coloured seeds are found. Seeds are hard and very small, up to 2 mm in diameter.
There are two groups of cultivars of finger millet, namely (a) the African highland types with grains enclosed within the florets and (b) Afro-Asiatic types with mature grains exposed out of the florets (Hulse et al., 1980). The cultivars vary in many characters, including height, ranging from dwarf-types (40 cm) to tall types of about 1 m. The colour of the vegetative organs varies from green to purple. The inflorescence may have straight and open spikes, incurved or closed spikes and branched spikes, resembling a cock. s comb. The length of spikes may range from 3 to 13 cm, the colour of grains may vary from white through orange red, deep brown, purple to almost black.
Finger millet is generally grown in higher rainfall areas (600-1200 mm) and is one of the better crops for acid soils. It matures within 100 to 130 days. Finger millet is an important staple food in East and Central Africa and in India (Hulse et al., 1980).
In Uganda, Finger millet is the second most important cereal after maize (Esele, 1989). Uganda is regarded as the centre of its origin, and was probably taken to India some 3000 years back (Hulse, 1980).
Figure 3: Finger millet
Foxtail millet
Foxtail, Figure 4, is an annual grass that is variable in its morphology (House et al., 1995). It is an important crop grow for food and feed in China. It is one of the main cereal crops grown in Northern China, where the other important crops are wheat and corn (Jiaju, 1989).
Plants range from single-stemmed to highly tillered. The highly tillering types range from 30 cm to almost 1 m, each tiller having a panicle pretty well described by its name - foxtail. Panicles are frequently small, 10 to 15 cm in length and 1.5 to 3 cm in diameter. The central rachis is frequently lax, so the panicle droops. By contrast, some varieties, especially those common in China, are single-stemmed, and range from 60-70 cm up to 150 cm high. Leaves are 30 to 35 cm long and 1.5 to 3 cm wide. The panicles have short branches, the central rachis is frequently stiff, but heads on some varieties droop. Seeds are small (2 to 3 mm) and are generally light cream in colour. Foxtail is adapted to temperate regions although found in the tropics. It has a broad range of maturity, from 70 to 120 days.
Figure 4: Foxtail millet
Proso millet (Common millet)
Proso, also known as common millet (Figure 5), is an annual grass adapted to temperate parts of the world. It is suited to a dry continental climate, and grows further north than most other millets (Hulse et al., 1980). It is mainly cultivated in Eastern Asia, including Mongolia, Manchuria, Japan, India, Eastern and Central Russia. It is also found in Arabia, Syria, Iran, Iraq, and Afghanistan. Common millet is reported to be the largest millet crop in USA, and one of the most popular cereals in Northern China, commanding a price equal to that of wheat (Hulse et al., 1980)
Proso is a shallow-rooted plant, which is highly variable in morphology, ranging from as short as 25 cm to 230 cm. Many tillers are formed, each with an open panicle with drooping branches. Panicle branches range from 4-5 cm up to 15 cm in length. Individual seeds weigh from 5 to 9 mg. Its inflorescence consists of a slender panicle up to 45 cm long, which may be open or compact. The caryopsis is generally white, oval and smooth.
Common millet displays possibly the lowest water requirement of any cereal. It matures in 60 to 90 days and may be grown where the climate is too hot, the rainy season too short or the soil too poor for any other cereal (Hulse et al., 1980).
Figure 5: Proso millet
Kodo millet
Kodo millet (Figure 6) is grown commercially in India (House et al., 1995), although the wild grass is a widespread tropical weed (Dogget, 1989). It is an annual millet that varies in height from 30 to 90 cm and has many basal tillers, between 10 and 48. The inflorescence is small, 2 to 12 cm. It matures late compared to other small millets. It is self-pollinating, florets generally remain closed during the flowering period. The grain occurs in a hard husk, making de-branning difficult. The crop is drought resistant, hardy and frequently grown on poor soils.
Kodo millet is reported to be poisonous after the rain, perhaps due to fungal infection (Dogget, 1989), but clean healthy grain seems to pose no health problem.
Figure 6:Kodo millet
Japanese barnyard millet
Japanese barnyard millet (Echinochloa frumentacea), Figure 7, is a short plant, frequently grown in Egypt as a reclamation crop on land, which is too saline for rice (Arnon, 1972, quoted by Hulse et al., 1980). It is the fastest growing of all the millets, and, under favourable moisture and temperature conditions, the grains would mature in 45 days after sowing (Hulse et al., 1980). However, Rachie, 1975, quoted by Hulse et al., (1980) reported that Echinocloa millets grow well in different seasons and at high elevations, but may require 3 - 4 months to mature.
Others (Pursegrove, 1972, quoted by Hulse et al., 1980) also reported that Japanese barnyard millet is a fast growing crop, and may take only 6 weeks to mature. Though not of importance, it is grown in the Orient and India, and as a forage crop in USA where it is reported to produce eight harvests per year.
The height of Japanese barnyard millet varies between 50 and 100 cm, the inflorescence consists of a panicle frequently tinged with purple, bearing up to 15 lateral branches. It is normally grown as a rainfed crop, but may be cultivated in waterlogged conditions and survive submersion. It may yield between 700 and 800 kg of grain per ha.
Figure 7:Japanese barnyard millet
Little millet
There are two races of little millet (Panicum miliare), namely, nana and robusta (House et al., 1995). Plants in race nana vary from 60 to 170 cm in height. The inflorescence is 14 to 15 cm long, erect, open, and highly branched. These branches sometimes droop at maturity. Plants in the race robusta are 120 to 190 cm tall. The inflorescence is 20 to 45 cm long, open or compact, and highly branched. It is primarily a self-pollinated crop, with up to 3.5 percent cross pollination.
Little millet (Figure 8) is grown throughout India up to altitudes of 2100 m, but is of little importance elsewhere (Hulse et al., 1980). Although little millet has received comparatively little attention from plant breeders, it appears to thrive under conditions where no other edible plant will survive. It matures between 2.5 to 5 months. The yields are generally less than 0.5 tonnes/ ha, but under favourable conditions, may reach close to 1 t / ha. Little millet tends be confused with common millet, but it is generally shorter, and has smaller panicles and seeds than common millets.
Figure 8:Little millet
Other millets
Tef
Tef in the most important cereal crop in Ethiopia, particularly in the poor drained heavy soils that predominate in the central plateau. Nevertheless, the crop has not become important outside Ethiopia (Dogget, 1989)
Fonio
Fonio, also known as hungry rice, is grown as a cereal crop throughout the savanna zone of West Africa. In parts of Guinea and Nigeria, it is the staple crop. It is considered to be the oldest West African cereal, and its cultivation is thought to date back to 5000 BC. The crop can grow on poor soils, but it is not grown outside Africa (Dogget, 1989).
Small millets
Small millets (also referred to as minor millets) may be defined as millets cultivated for their grains which are borne on short, slender grassy plants, but pearl millets (Pennisetum) are excluded (Doggett, 1989). Small millets include Finger millet, Proso millet, foxtail millet, little millet, Baranyard (Sawa) millet, kodo millet, Tef millet and Fonio millet. The grains of small millets are nutritionally superior to rice and wheat, providing minerals and vitamins (Rao, 1989).
In India, small millets occupy 4.5 percent of the cultivated area and are confined to vast stretches of dryland and hilly tracks (Rao, 1989). The productivity of finger millet in India is the highest among the small millets, at 1 150 kg/ha during 1983-84. The productivity of other small millets remained at 450 kg/ha (Rao, 1989).
A structural comparison of the most important millets has already been presented in Table 2.
Millets, in most cases, have been grown in difficult conditions, and it is scarcely surprising that they involve high production risks (Dogget, 1989). They have always been crops for situation where there is a risk of famine, as well as offering a low but more reliable harvest relative to other crops.
Although it is found in other countries, finger millet has gained little importance outside Africa and India. Equally important to note is that, common millet has received little attention from plant breeders (Hulse et al., 1980).
In most parts of the world, millet is grown as a subsistence crop for local consumption. Commercial millet production is risky, especially in Africa because the absence of large market outlets means that fluctuations in output cause significant price fluctuations, particularly in areas where millet is the main food crop (FAO and ICRISAT, 1996). Apart from grain production, millet is also cultivated for grazing, green fodder or silage.
According to Spencer and Sivakumar (1987) world production of all millets is about 29 million tonnes, of which 35 percent is produced in Africa (Tables 5 and 6). This represents about one third of all the world millets, 70 percent of which is grown in West Africa. According to FAO and ICRISAT (1996), developing countries, mainly Asia and Africa, account for about 94 percent of global output of millet, estimated at some 28 million tonnes (according to the 1992-1994 average) (Table 7).
|
Scientific name |
Common names |
Cytogenic origin |
Location grown |
|
Sorghum bicolour |
Sorghum, milo, jowar, kafir, Guinea-corn, cholam |
Equatorial Africa |
Worldwide, Africa, India, China, United States. |
|
Pennisetum glaucum P. americanum P. typhoides |
Pearl, bajra, cattail, burlush, Candlestick, sanyo, munga, seno |
West Africa |
Africa, India. |
|
Eleucine coracona |
Finger, ragi, African, bird. s foot, rapoko, Hansa |
Originated in Africa and domesticated in India |
East and Central Africa, India, China. |
|
Setaria italica |
Foxtail, Italian, kangni, navane, German, Siberian, Hungarian |
Eastern Asia |
Asia (Russian Federation, China, India, Japan) North Africa, Southeast Europe, Near East |
|
Panicum miliaceum |
Proso, Common, Hershey, Panivarigu, broomcorn, hog, Samai, Russian |
China |
Eastern Asia, Russian Federation, China, Mongolia, Middle East, Main millet in USA |
|
Echnochloa frumentacea E. crus-galli E. utilis |
Japanese, barnyard, sanwa, kweichou, kudiraivali, sawan, Korean |
Java / Malaysia |
East Asia, India, Egypt |
|
Paspalum scrobiculatum P. commersoni |
Kodo, varagu, bastard, ditch, naraka |
Africa or India |
India |
|
Eragrostis tef |
Tef |
Ethiopia |
East Africa (Ethiopia) |
|
Digitalia exilis D. iburua |
Fonio, fundi, hungry rice, acha, Crabgrass, raishan |
Domesticated in Nigeria |
West Africa (savanna) |
Source: Saldivar and Rooney, 1995.
Table 6. Average Annual Area, production and Yield of millets and Percentage of Total Cereal Production by Major Producing Countries in Africa plus Major Regions of the World, in 1974-76 and 1980-82.
|
Region (country) |
Area (. 000 ha) 1974-76 1980-82 |
Cereal production (%) 1974-76 1980-82 |
Production (. 000 mt) 1974-76 1980-82 |
Yield (kg per ha) 1974-76 1980-82 | ||||
|
Africa |
15 218 |
16 247 |
13.9 |
13.8 |
9 630 |
10 249 |
633 |
619 |
|
Burkina Faso |
857 |
870 |
31.7 |
32.1 |
364 |
387 |
425 |
441 |
|
Chad 1 |
959 |
1 160 |
87.8 |
88.0 |
520 |
593 |
542 |
510 |
|
Mali 1 |
1 212 |
1 425 |
70.1 |
76.9 |
852 |
868 |
702 |
615 |
|
Niger |
2 150 |
3 060 |
74.0 |
76.5 |
828 |
1 321 |
385 |
432 |
|
Nigeria |
4 800 |
5 230 |
34.5 |
32.4 |
2 843 |
3 220 |
592 |
636 |
|
Senegal 1 |
1 004 |
938 |
79.7 |
80.7 |
658 |
642 |
655 |
705 |
|
Sudan |
1 126 |
1 120 |
15.8 |
12.3 |
416 |
393 |
370 |
345 |
|
Uganda |
498 |
303 |
38.2 |
42.1 |
613 |
489 |
1 232 |
1 615 |
|
Asia |
25 212 |
23 450 |
3.0 |
2.5 |
16 718 |
16 445 |
663 |
701 |
|
India |
18 338 |
18 096 |
7.6 |
6.7 |
9 042 |
9 426 |
493 |
521 |
|
South America |
211 |
167 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
241 |
193 |
1 141 |
1 157 |
|
USSR |
2 914 |
2 807 |
1.4 |
1.1 |
2 410 |
1 791 |
827 |
637 |
|
WORLD |
43 610 |
43 050 |
2.1 |
1.8 |
29 062 |
28 733 |
666 |
668 |
1
Includes sorghumSource: Spencer and Sivakumar, 1987.
Table 7. Millet area, yield and production by region 1.
|
|
Area (million ha) 1979-81 1989-91 1992-94 |
Yield (tonnes / ha) 1979-81 1989-91 1992-94 |
Production (million tonnes) 1979-81 1989-91 1992-94 | ||||||
|
Developing countries |
34.7 |
37.4 |
35.6 |
0.68 |
0.73 |
0.75 |
23.67 |
25.0 |
26.6 |
|
Africa |
11.5 |
15.8 |
18.5 |
0.67 |
0.66 |
0.61 |
7.68 |
10.46 |
11.36 |
|
Northern Africa |
1.10 |
1.05 |
1.96 |
0.40 |
0.18 |
0.28 |
0.44 |
0.19 |
0.55 |
|
Sudan |
1.10 |
1.05 |
1.95 |
0.40 |
0.18 |
0.28 |
0.44 |
0.19 |
0.55 |
|
Western Africa |
8.30 |
12.6 |
14.0 |
0.67 |
0.68 |
0.64 |
5.52 |
8.55 |
9.00 |
|
Burkina Faso |
0.80 |
1.21 |
1.24 |
0.49 |
0.54 |
0.64 |
0.39 |
0.65 |
0.79 |
|
Ghana |
0.18 |
0.19 |
0.20 |
0.64 |
0.64 |
0.82 |
0.12 |
0.12 |
0.17 |
|
Côte d. Ivoire |
0.06 |
0.08 |
0.08 |
0.58 |
0.61 |
0.84 |
0.04 |
0.05 |
0.07 |
|
Mali |
0.64 |
1.19 |
1.20 |
0.72 |
0.69 |
0.61 |
0.46 |
0.82 |
0.73 |
|
Niger |
3.01 |
4.19 |
4.87 |
0.44 |
0.34 |
0.38 |
1.31 |
1.43 |
1.86 |
|
Nigeria |
2.40 |
4.50 |
5.20 |
1.04 |
1.04 |
0.89 |
2.50 |
4.67 |
4.62 |
|
Senegal |
0.93 |
0.90 |
0.89 |
0.60 |
0.64 |
0.61 |
0.56 |
0.58 |
0.55 |
|
Togo |
0.12 |
0.13 |
0.13 |
0.36 |
0.51 |
0.50 |
0.04 |
0.07 |
0.06 |
|
Central Africa |
0.63 |
0.79 |
0.93 |
0.59 |
0.51 |
0.48 |
0.37 |
0.40 |
0.45 |
|
Cameroon |
0.13 |
0.06 |
0.05 |
0.75 |
1.06 |
1.01 |
0.10 |
0.06 |
0.06 |
|
Chad |
0.36 |
0.54 |
0.59 |
0.50 |
0.40 |
0.47 |
0.18 |
0.22 |
0.28 |
|
Eastern Africa |
1.46 |
1.33 |
1.46 |
0.89 |
0.97 |
0.91 |
1.31 |
1.29 |
1.33 |
|
Ethiopia |
0.23 |
0.25 |
0.25 |
0.90 |
0.95 |
1.05 |
0.20 |
0.24 |
0.27 |
|
Kenya |
0.08 |
0.10 |
0.09 |
1.05 |
0.67 |
0.65 |
0.08 |
0.07 |
0.06 |
|
Tanzania |
0.45 |
0.23 |
0.32 |
0.80 |
0.94 |
0.71 |
0.36 |
0.22 |
0.23 |
|
Uganda |
0.30 |
0.38 |
0.41 |
1.59 |
1.53 |
1.57 |
0.47 |
0.58 |
0.63 |
|
Zimbabwe |
0.35 |
0.27 |
0.25 |
0.43 |
0.50 |
0.27 |
0.15 |
0.14 |
0.07 |
|
Southern Africa |
0.09 |
0.11 |
0.21 |
0.41 |
0.49 |
0.18 |
0.04 |
0.06 |
0.04 |
|
Asia |
22.98 |
18.29 |
16.99 |
0.69 |
0.79 |
0.89 |
15.75 |
14.45 |
15.17 |
|
Near East |
0.19 |
0.18 |
0.15 |
1.02 |
0.58 |
0.78 |
0.19 |
0.10 |
0.12 |
|
Far East |
22.79 |
18.41 |
16.84 |
0.68 |
0.78 |
0.89 |
15.56 |
14.35 |
15.05 |
|
China |
3.98 |
2.25 |
1.90 |
1.45 |
1.74 |
1.93 |
5.79 |
3.92 |
3.67 |
|
India |
17.84 |
15.19 |
13.95 |
0.51 |
0.64 |
0.77 |
9.19 |
9.76 |
10.70 |
|
Myanmar |
0.18 |
0.17 |
0.20 |
0.45 |
0.69 |
0.66 |
0.08 |
0.12 |
0.13 |
|
Nepal |
0.12 |
0.20 |
0.21 |
0.99 |
1.16 |
1.14 |
0.12 |
0.23 |
0.24 |
|
Pakistan |
0.51 |
0.44 |
0.43 |
0.50 |
0.41 |
0.44 |
0.25 |
0.18 |
0.19 |
|
Central America and Caribbean |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
South America |
0.20 |
0.04 |
0.04 |
1.21 |
1.19 |
1.53 |
0.25 |
0.06 |
0.06 |
|
Argentina |
0.20 |
0.04 |
0.04 |
1.21 |
1.19 |
1.53 |
0.25 |
0.06 |
0.06 |
|
Developed Countries |
2.94 |
4.13 |
2.49 |
0.65 |
0.88 |
0.72 |
1.93 |
3.64 |
1.79 |
|
Australia |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
1.0 |
0.88 |
1.05 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
|
United States |
0.09 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
1.2 |
1.20 |
1.20 |
0.11 |
0.18 |
0.18 |
|
Russian Federation2 |
2.79 |
3.92 |
2.27 |
0.63 |
0.87 |
0.68 |
1.76 |
3.40 |
1.54 |
|
World |
37.60 |
38.60 |
38.10 |
0.68 |
0.74 |
0.74 |
25.70 |
28.65 |
28.38 |
1. Each figure is a 3-year average for the respective period e.g. 1979-81
2.Until 1991, area of the former USSR
Source: FAO and ICRISAT (1996)
NB: Many of the statistics are only estimates, therefore analyses derived from these data should be treated with caution (FAO and ICRISAT (1996).
Table 8. Millet recorded international trade: exports 1
|
Exports |
1979-81 (. 000 tonnes) |
1989-91 (. 000 tonnes) |
1992-94 (. 000 tonnes) |
|
Africa |
57.9 |
26.4 |
20.2 |
|
Mali |
0.02 |
15.0 |
18.0 |
|
Niger |
36.7 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
|
Sudan |
2.1 |
1.3 |
0.0 |
|
Asia |
12.0 |
16.8 |
84.6 |
|
China |
8.7 |
4.6 |
21.6 |
|
India |
0.0 |
7.0 |
58.5 |
|
North, Central and South America +Caribbean |
145.9 |
119.1 |
90.3 |
|
Argentina |
112.9 |
41.0 |
42.9 |
|
United States |
33.0 |
75.5 |
45.5 |
|
Europe |
20.5 |
33.0 |
43.7 |
|
EC (12 countries)3 |
15.6 |
22.6 |
28.3 |
|
Hungary |
4.4 |
6.9 |
13.0 |
|
Oceania |
14.6 |
13.6 |
16.3 |
|
Australia |
14.6 |
13.6 |
16.3 |
|
World |
250.9 |
208.7 |
255.0 |
|
Developing countries |
181.9 |
84.0 |
147.4 |
|
Developed countries |
69.0 |
124.7 |
107.6 |
1. Each figure is a 3-year average for the respective
period, e.g. 1979-81
2. Shown as zero for trade less that 50 tonnes
3. Including intra-trade among member countries
Table 9. Millet recorded international trade: imports 1
|
Imports |
1979-81 (. 000 tonnes) |
1989-91 (. 000 tonnes) |
1992-94 (. 000 tonnes) |
|
Africa |
82.0 |
7.9 |
40.9 |
|
Angola |
0.02 |
0.0 |
21.7 |
|
Côte d. Ivoire |
0.0 |
2.6 |
1.2 |
|
Gabon |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
|
Mauritania |
1.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
Mali |
40.0 |
0.0 |
0.5 |
|
Niger |
8.0 |
2.4 |
0.5 |
|
Nigeria |
26.7 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
|
Senegal |
0.0 |
2.1 |
15.0 |
|
Sudan |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.3 |
|
Zimbabwe |
0.2 |
0.0 |
0.3 |
|
Asia |
58.9 |
40.3 |
44.3 |
|
Japan |
53.1 |
23.7 |
20.3 |
|
Kuwait |
1.1 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
|
Malaysia |
0.7 |
2.1 |
2.4 |
|
Saudi Arabia |
1.4 |
1.5 |
2.8 |
|
Singapore |
0.4 |
1.1 |
0.7 |
|
Thailand |
0.8 |
1.7 |
1.8 |
|
North, Central and South America + Caribbean |
4.0 |
26.2 |
18.1 |
|
Brazil |
3.8 |
3.7 |
5.8 |
|
Canada |
0.0 |
5.9 |
8.2 |
|
Europe |
145.7 |
145.5 |
155.4 |
|
Austria |
2.3 |
1.2 |
0.8 |
|
EC (12 countries)3 |
114.9 |
131.5 |
145.2 |
|
Switzerland |
26.0 |
9.2 |
8.2 |
|
Oceania |
0.8 |
0.8 |
5.7 |
|
World |
291.9 |
220.8 |
264.3 |
|
Developing countries |
90.5 |
43.8 |
75.4 |
|
Developed countries |
201.0 |
177.0 |
188.8 |
1. Each figure is a 3-year average for the respective period, e.g. 1979-81
2. Shown as zero for trade less that 50 tonnes
3. Including intra-trade among member countries
Note: The discrepancies between imports and exports are largely because some exporting counties do not report millet sales at all, or include them under "other cereals".
Source: FAO & ICRISAT, 1996
|
Year |
Argentina (US$ / tonne) |
United States (US$ / tonne) |
Australia (US $ / tonne) |
|
1979-81 (Average) |
129 |
186 |
224 |
|
1983 |
147 |
175 |
251 |
|
1984 |
166 |
176 |
254 |
|
1985 |
107 |
171 |
210 |
|
1986 |
139 |
151 |
195 |
|
1987 |
108 |
154 |
162 |
|
1988 |
123 |
173 |
110 |
|
1989 |
190 |
177 |
249 |
|
1990 |
143 |
188 |
318 |
|
1991 |
107 |
156 |
249 |
|
1992 |
114 |
170 |
249 |
|
1993 |
156 |
223 |
245 |
|
1994 |
228 |
254 |
325 |
Source: FAO & ICRISAT, 1996.
Of the 28 million tonnes, pearl millet accounts for about 15 million tonnes, foxtail millet accounts for about 5 million tonnes, proso millet for about 4 million tonnes and finger millet for over 3 million tonnes (FAO and ICRISAT, 1996).
Small-scale farmers produce almost all millets for household consumption and localized trade. Very limited quantities of millet are produced in the developed countries. Correspondingly, only small quantities of millet are recorded in the international trade (FAO and ICRISAT, 1996).
The major African producers are Nigeria and Niger, both in West Africa. Other major producers are Burkina Faso, Chad, Mali, and Senegal in West Africa, and Sudan and Uganda in East Africa (Spencer and Sivakumar, 1987; FAO and ICRISAT, 1996). Pearl millet is the major millet grown in Africa. Apart from Uganda, which grows mainly finger millet, all the major African producers listed in Table 7 produce mainly pearl millet.
In all the major African millet producing countries, the crop is of considerable importance in the agricultural system, and accounts for over one third of the total cereal output. This contrasts with the other areas of the world, where large quantities of millets are produced, but in which they usually account for less than 10 percent of the total cereal output. For example, India grows one third of the world. s millet (Table 7), but the crop only represents about 7 percent of the total cereal production (Spencer and Sivakumar, 1987). In relative terms, pearl millet is more important to the agricultural systems and economies of Africa than other regions of the world.
In Africa, South of the Sahara, finger millet occupies the largest area under small millets in the Eastern part of the continent, but there is a substantial area of tef in Ethiopia (Doggett, 1989). In West Africa, fonio millet occupies a similar ecological niche to finger millet. There is also a small area of Brachiaria deflexa millet there. Area and production figures for these millets separately are not readily available. Data collected on the small millets are often combined with pearl millet and sometimes with sorghum (Doggett, 1989). Finger millet is grown abundantly in the Lake Victoria region, namely Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania, Zaire, Rwanda and Burundi. The crop is also important in Northern Zambia and the southern highlands of Tanzania. Significant amounts are also grown in Zimbabwe, Malawi and Mozambique. It is possible to get an approximate picture for the situation of finger millet in Uganda, because very little of any other millet is grown (Doggett, 1989)
In India, during the period 1970-71 to 1980-81, finger millet production increased at a rate of 3.37 percent per year, which exceeded the rate of population growth (Doggett, 1989). In India, grain price is clearly very important, but a crop such as finger millet is probably most influenced by very local demands. Finger millet shows a higher probability of failure than pearl millet, rice, or sorghum (Doggett, 1989). In India, out of the total area of 126.67 million ha in 1984-85 under food grain, the small millets area was just 5.78 million ha, or 4.56 percent (Sampath et al., 1989). In production, their contribution was 3.85 million tonnes or 2.63 percent of the total 146.22 million tonnes of food grain in the country. However, the contribution of small millets to total cereal is 14.76 percent in area and 12. 36 percent in production (Sampath et al., 1989).
There are two regions of the world where finger millet is most intensively grown, namely, the area immediately surrounding Lake Victoria in East Africa, and the south eastern parts of Karnataka and parts of Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh in Southern India (Gupta, 1989). These regions account for nearly 75 percent of the world. s production of this cereal (Gupta, 1989). In Africa, finger millet is produced principally in Uganda, Tanzania, Rwanda, Burundi, Eastern Zaire, Kenya and to a lesser extent in Ethiopia, Sudan, and Somalia (Gupta, 1989). It is also grown in Zimbabwe, Malawi, Zambia, Botswana and Madagascar. In central and Western Africa, it is grown to a limited extent in central Africa, southern Chad and northeastern Nigeria. In Uganda, finger millet is the most important cereal, equalling all other cereals combines (Gupta, 1989). In fact, finger millet is the only other millet of consequence after pearl millet throughout Africa (Gupta, 1989). More information on world distribution of millets is shown in Table 5.
According to FAO and ICRISAT, (1996) the total world production of millet in the period 1979 to the period 1994 has been relatively stable (with minor fluctuations) between 25 and slightly over 30 million tonnes Table 7.
From Table 7, it can be seen that, based on 1979-81 and 1992-94 records respectively, the world. s five major producers of millet, in million tonnes, are, in that order, India (10.7 and 9.2), China (3.7 and 5.8) Nigeria (4.6 and 2.5), Russian Federation/USSR (1.5 and 1.8) and Niger (1.9 and 2.3).
Global trade in millet is estimated to range between 200 000 and 300 000 tonnes, representing roughly 0.1 percent of world trade in cereal, or 1.0 percent of world millet production (FAO and ICRISAT, 1996). The major exporters are India, the United States, Argentina and China, which together supplies about two-thirds of all recorded, exports (Table 8).
The recorded international imports of millets are tabulated in Table 9. The European community accounts for more than 50 percent of the global imports (FAO and ICRISAT, 1996).
Besides this official trade, a substantial unrecorded quantity of millet is traded within subregion in Africa, with grain moving from surplus to deficit areas. In West Africa for example, there is movement of millet during good years from surplus producing areas along the southern boundary of the Sahara both southward to higher-rainfall but millet deficient areas and northward to supply nomadic populations (FAO and ICRISAT, 1996).
Millet marketing channels in many developing countries are not well developed. There are three main reasons for this: scattered and irregular supplies, large distances between producing areas and the main urban centres and limited demand in urban areas (FAO and ICRISAT, 1996).
International trade in millet is controlled by a few specialized trading companies and generally conducted on a sample basis. Only Argentina is reported to have established official export quality standards (FAO and ICRISAT, 1996). The average annual millet export prices for selected countries are shown in Table 10.
Traditional methods are usually applied to decorticate millet grains partially or completely before further processing and consumption. Whole grains may as well be directly dry-milled to give a range of products: broken or cracked grains, grits, coarse meal and fine flour. The flour thus obtained is used in the preparation of an extensive variety of simple to complex food products. They can also be mixed with other flours to form composite flours for soft and stiff porridges (Bangu et al., 2000)
It is unusual, in any human society, for cereals to be eaten as uncooked whole seeds (Hulse et al., 1980). For human food, the millet grains are customarily milled before being cooked. Dry milling embraces a wide range of techn