Zoran Grgić, Ramona Franić, Ivan.
Kisić
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb
Introduction
The Impact
of Transition and Structure of Property rights
The impact
of agriculture on the environment
The influence
of society on the Agricultural Environment
Conclusions
References
Due to unfavourable economic conditions in the entire economy, and
because of the poor economic position of a large number of producers over
a long period, Croatian agriculture has been a rather insignificant polluter
of the environment. Family farms in particular, having a greater part of
agricultural resources, have used less potentially harmful inputs in agriculture.
On the other hand, an underdeveloped ecological sense and unsatisfactory
professional support for the producers caused in rural areas an inadequate
use of inputs, and an unorganized disposal of the waste and by-products
of agricultural production. Rational management of waste and harmful stuffs
is commonly legalized practice in agricultural companies, but on the majority
of family farms in rural areas no attention was paid to this problem in
the past. Today, there is an institutional and legal framework established
in Croatia for regular monitoring and control of all important factors
affecting the environment. Agricultural production is affecting the environment
on the one hand by using potentially harmful inputs (pesticides, fertilizers,
manure), and by its by-products and waste on the other.
The considerable pressure of agriculture on the environment is expected
in the future due to an increased need for intensifying agricultural production
as one of the basic economic activities in Croatia. The most rapid production
growth in conventional agriculture should be achieved through an increased
use of fertilizers and pesticides. The plan for the next decade is to reach
the level of current consumption of these inputs in developed countries.
According to predicted agricultural development, and requests for environmental
protection, the consumption of these inputs has to be rational and controlled.
There is also a need to develop the concept of sustainable agriculture
through its basic elements, in particular land resources, sustainable land
management, and integrated pest management.
Transition processes in the Croatian economy have had a direct impact
on overall production conditions in agriculture. These changes are mostly
reflected in the economic position of agricultural producers determined
by price parities of agricultural inputs and outputs, by changes in distribution
and agricultural land utilization, and by a system of state support to
agriculture.
The basic foundation of Croatian agriculture is family farms, which
in the ex-socialist system already hold more than 65 percent of agricultural
land, and more than 90 percent of livestock. The privatization of production
resources in agriculture began closely after attaining independence in
1991. Of more than 400 agricultural firms formerly "socially-owned", the
great majority are now privatized and organized as private enterprises
or joint stock companies. Former agricultural cooperatives also do business
as privately owned commercial companies. A part of nationalized agricultural
land has been given back to its former owners or, alternatively, they have
received some form of compenzation. Most of the processing capacities are
still owned by the state privatization fund, but they will be privatized
in the future.
Croatian legislation is positively oriented to stimulate enlarging
the land property, and to encourage the "farmer type" of production. Out
of more than 530 000 family farms dealing with agriculture as prevailing
or additional activity, about 100-150 000 farms are expected to develop
commercial production. The latter are expected to function as profitable
systems on which state support measures would be implemented more efficiently.
Rural areas, particularly mountainous and hilly regions, are additionally
stimulated by the system of premiums and penalties, so as to develop agricultural
activities with regard to the demands of domestic markets and comparative
regional advantages.
The former planning system of agricultural production, in which
family farms used to be only a kind of "service" for social-owned agricultural
companies, was abandoned in the 1980s. During that time, the domestic prices
of agricultural goods and inputs were set apart from the influences of
the world market. Being based on the cost of production, the price system
resulted in an inadequate regional allocation of agricultural resources
and investment in agro-processing capacities.
After 1990, trade liberalization started in the whole economy including
agriculture. The Croatian Government has prepared its agricultural reform
policy with the aim of entering into the World Trade Organization. A basic
characteristic of these preparations is a decrease in the level of agricultural
protection. However, at the same time, the intention exists to preserve
the balance in protection between domestic agricultural producers and processors.
The system of agricultural protection in Croatia is based on the system
of protection prices. Direct price support is restricted to strategically
important products, for which there exists a national interest in increased
production. Producer prices of those products are supported by a combination
of protection prices, production subsidies (premiums and reimbursements),
and by import protection measures, such as tariffs and variable levies,
while import quotas and special import taxes have recently been removed.
There are no serious limitations on the export of Croatian agricultural
products. Export licenses apply to only a few medicinal and drug-based
plants and plant products, mainly in conformity with international obligations.
The economic conditions for developing agricultural production within
family farms are determined by the strategic goals of increasing the size
of farms, and on the improvement of the economic situation of family farms.
Changes in agricultural structure, the financing of rural areas and agriculture,
the new orientation of trade and price policies, developing agricultural
extension services, and the continual improvement of the social and economic
position of agricultural households are fundamental determinants and priorities
in the Strategy of Croatian agricultural development, adopted by the Croatian
parliament in 1995.
Of approximately 3 million hectares of agricultural land in Croatia,
almost 1.9 million hectares is arable land. Today, about 1.97 million hectares
of agricultural, and about 1.51 million hectares of arable, land is privately
owned by family farms. From the aspect of natural resources utilization,
special attention has to be given to introducing into production nearly
260 000 hectares of abandoned land area. This relates to 100 000 hectares
owned by family farms and about 160 000 hectares in possession of companies,
which are ex-social firms. Since the agricultural reform of the past regime,
until the beginning of the 1990s there was no significant agricultural
land trade.
Table 1: Structure of agricultural, arable and cultivated land in Croatia in 1996
|
|
|
|
|
| agricultural land |
1 034
|
1 973
|
3 007
|
| pastures |
678
|
459
|
1 137
|
| ponds, read beds and fishponds |
23
|
3
|
26
|
| arable land |
332
|
1 511
|
1 843
|
| orchards and vineyards |
7
|
118
|
125
|
| meadows |
70
|
343
|
413
|
| arable land and vegetable gardens |
255
|
1 050
|
1 305
|
| land sown (arable land and vegetable gardens) |
161
|
773
|
934
|
| cereals |
112
|
507
|
619
|
| industrial crops |
42
|
33
|
75
|
| vegetables |
2
|
114
|
116
|
| forage |
6
|
118
|
124
|
| uncultivated |
93
|
275
|
368
|
Agricultural land tenure (almost completely of arable land, and less
of meadows and pastures) has been developed in the private sector. The
average family farm size is about three hectares, and less than 3 000 farms
have a size greater than 20 hectares of agricultural area1.
At the end of the 1980s, unfavourable economic conditions and gradual economic
deterioration caused, in some regions, social-owned companies to rent arable
areas to prosperous family farms. Consequently, in plain regions some family
farms have cultivated more than 150 hectares of arable land over the years.
To fulfil those objectives concerning the enlargement of family farm
size, the privatization of ex-social companies and the reclamation of abandoned
land, the Government laid down incentive laws and regulations that enabled
long-term renting and gave loans for the purchase of agricultural land.
Tenders for land lease and purchase, with a period of lease and repayment
of up to 20 years, are administered by regional governments. Likewise,
soil-improvement measures (hydro-meliorative, technological) are also covered
by the credit system. It is estimated that about 350 000 hectares is disposable
for purchase and long-term land tenure, both from ex-social arable land
and from land that elderly households left to the state during the last
decade. The private sector has no common practice in agricultural land
trade; households that are not engaged in intensive agricultural production
prefer to rent their land.
Input and output price relations in agriculture showed extreme instability
during the period of high inflation from 1992-1994. The current price protection
system significantly diminished this instability and disparity, but, due
to the relatively high importation of agricultural products, the slow re-activation
of business companies, and inadequately developed market institutions,
certain distortions can still be found in the domestic market of agricultural
products.
Table 2: Average producer prices of basic agricultural products
in 1997 in US$/ton
|
|
|
|
|
| Wheat |
136.23
|
Plums
|
529.24
|
| Maize |
106.99
|
Apples
|
451.93
|
| Rye |
171.26
|
Pears
|
374.63
|
| Barley |
162.38
|
Cherry
|
1 361.75
|
| Seed-wheat |
207.21
|
Sour cherry
|
297.33
|
| Seed-maize |
2 033.24
|
Peaches
|
814.67
|
| Industrial crops |
|
Strawberries
|
576.81
|
| Sunflower |
342.41
|
Olives
|
963.33
|
| Oilseed rape |
333.00
|
Grapes
|
362.74
|
| Soybean |
347.28
|
Potatoes
|
184.34
|
| Sugar-beets |
42.32
|
Seed-potatoes
|
529.24
|
| Tabacco |
2 663.44
|
Beans
|
1 468.79
|
| Forage |
|
Onions
|
303.27
|
| Hay |
71.27
|
Cabbage
|
196.23
|
| Clover |
87,95
|
Paprika
|
362.74
|
| Other forage |
30.52
|
Tomatoes
|
261.65
|
Producer prices of basic cereals and industrial crops (oilseeds and
sugar-beets) include a state subsidy. These prices are rather stable. Great
seasonable variability can be seen in the prices of fruit and vegetables.
Insufficient domestic production and inadequate storage and processing
capacities are the reasons for significant imports of fruit and vegetables.
Although the protection system of domestic production is applied, the prices
of a great majority of fruit and vegetables are at the level of the nearest
international market prices.
Input prices have been relatively stable during the past 3-4 years.
Depending on the type and share of active substances, average prices of
fertilizers are about
US$250-340 per tonne. The price of oil without government subsidy is
about US$0.6 per liter, while for certain crop productions those prices
are below US$0.5 per litre, due to state support measures. A similar situation
is found in fertilizer prices, where purchase prices for producers are
20-30 percent lower. This is often the way of support to contractual production
on family farms by business entities and cooperatives.
Table 3: Prices of basis inputs in agriculture in 1996 in US$/t
|
|
|
| UREA |
177.21
|
| KAN (reinforce nutrition) |
122.50
|
| NPK (various combinations of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium) |
205.15
|
| Pesticides |
|
| herbicides |
4 757.20
|
| fungicides |
4 519.34
|
| insecticides |
8 206.18
|
| Energy inputs |
|
| Diesel |
624.38
|
| Petrol |
784.94
|
| Oil |
3 865.23
|
| Electricity (thousands kWh) |
63.77
|
Livestock production shows a rather stable purchase price for milk,
that is about US$0.4 per litre, including the government subsidy. Prices
of fattened animals have greater seasonal and annual fluctuations, due
to unstable relationships on the domestic agricultural product market,
as mentioned above. The basic reasons for these fluctuations are those
unbalanced supplies that depends on the production of a large number of
small-size family farms, as well as the great impact of price fluctuations
in basic cereals used for livestock feed. Prices of beef and veal are about
US$2.2-2.7/kg and US$3.0-3.3/kg, respectively. Prices of pigs for fattening
are about US$2.2/kg, and those of fattened hogs are about US$2.3/kg.
The input and output price system in agriculture now provides a relatively
favourable economic framework for the business of family farms with a high
level of work productivity and satisfactory utilization of available resources.
The great majority of family farms (almost 60 percent) have an area of
less than 3 hectares, and their business is not economically efficient
in agriculture. Nevertheless, such farms ensure the economic survival of
the families farming them.
The overall deterioration of the environment in Croatia has now
reached a level that required organized activities, above all preventive
ones, directed toward its protection and preservation. However, agricultural
development in Croatia is not based on large-scale farms that could possibly
be greater polluters of the environment. The concept of large-scale agricultural
capacities within ex-social companies was already abandoned at the beginning
of 1980s. Although there was no adequate attention paid to the problem
of environment protection up until a decade ago, the soil, water and air
in Croatia are among the best most preserved in Europe. Relatively low
levels of aggressive substances used in family farm production, and a relatively
smaller percentage in the ex-social sector that used more of the potentially
harmful inputs (fertilizers, pesticides, fossil/solid fuels) and had larger
livestock farms (harmful gases and waste), meant that agriculture had a
significantly smaller role as a polluter.
While Croatia has the most preserved soils in Europe, However the
damage caused to the pedosphere has reached such a level that it needed
to be investigation and activities organized for its protection, are needed.
In agriculture there is, however, a relatively low level of production
intensity which has little significance in soil pollution.
In Croatia, the Law on agricultural soil has been enacted, giving
special emphasis to the protection of natural resource. Regulations on
Croatian agricultural soil protection, agreed in collaboration with other
Alpine and Alpine-Adriatic countries, determine
the principal parameters of soil protection. Ten heavy metals, and PAH
(Polycyclical Aromatic Hydrocarbons) of organic
substances are marked as polluters. Limitations are duly determined for
the maximum tolerated content in soil.2
In the process of soil protection, Croatia has organized an inventory
of damage processes, and has established a system of stations for the permanent
monitoring of soil status. Additionally, there is a plan for organizing
an adequate service of soil protection by providing a complete information
system on soils. In Croatia, agricultural and forestland are under the
competence of the Ministry of Environmental Protection, although treated
separately. The role of the Ministry of Environmental Protection regarding
the soil, is still unclear as it is possible to protect the environment
without protecting the soil.
Regarding crop production in Croatia, about 7.2 thousand tonnes
of pesticides (3.2 tonnes of active ingredients), and about 379 thousand
tonnes of various fertilizers are used annually. Estimates are that the
private sector in agriculture uses annually less than two tonnes of manure
per hectare of arable land. Consumption of fossil fuel in agriculture is
about 308 thousand tonnes. Considering the average consumption of about
3.9 kg of pesticides (1.7 kg of active ingredients) and 205 kg of fertilizers
per hectare of
arable land, Croatia is significantly below the average
levels of those amounts in developed European countries. In agricultural
companies and cooperatives, the consumption of fertilizers was about 304
kg/ha of
arable land in 1997. Pesticide consumption in that sector
is about 6.23 kg/ha. In family farms, the consumption of fertilizers is
173 kg/ha of arable land, while the pesticide consumption is 1.9 kg/ha,
of which herbicides were one kg.
Table 4: Consumption of mineral fertilizers in tonnes
|
|
|
|
|
| Total quantity |
316 937
|
347 557
|
379 124
|
| Private producers – total |
182 555
|
221 351
|
240 608
|
| Companies and cooperatives – total |
134 382
|
119 206
|
138 516
|
| - Mixed and composite |
73 946
|
66 802
|
77 525
|
| - Nitrogen |
58 896
|
50 787
|
59 602
|
| - Phosphate |
58
|
38
|
2
|
| - Potassium |
1 482
|
1 597
|
1 387
|
| Active ingredient | |||
| Total |
61 838
|
79 912
|
79 268
|
| N |
26 709
|
36 155
|
35 273
|
| P2O5 |
15 959
|
20 577
|
20 747
|
| K2O |
19 170
|
23 180
|
23 248
|
The consumption of pesticides has decreased during the last ten years. This situation is similar to the consumption of fertilizers on family farms which decreased in 1995 compared with 1991 (Tables 4 and 6). This is the result of unfavourable global economic conditions after the war (mainly a lack of money and unclear market conditions). Ecological reasons had no significant impact on this aspect of consumption in agriculture.
Table 5: Consumption of agricultural chemicals in 1996 in tonnes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Fungicides |
1 246.00
|
1 167.78
|
78.21
|
691.70
|
1 937.70
|
| Herbicides |
2 336.05
|
1 106.00
|
48.00
|
1 517.45
|
3 853.50
|
| Insecticides |
748.60
|
431.00
|
7.00
|
697.00
|
1 445.60
|
| Total used |
4 330.65
|
2 704.78
|
133
|
2 906.32
|
7 236.97
|
During this past three-year period, the improved economic situation
has had a stimulating impact on input consumption. Estimations show that
adequate technological usage of pesticides and fertilizers in intensive
agricultural production is applied on only 20 percent of arable land in
Croatia. Input consumption on the rest of that land is much more lower.
Increased consumption is expected in the future, particularly because of
the improving economic position of family farms, which ten years ago, used
only a half of today's quantity of inputs.
Crop production in Croatia is expected to be more intensive in the
near future, which means a higher level of potentially harmful substances.
Special attention will thus need to be paid to strategically important
crop production (cereals, oilseeds and other industrial crops), as well
as to the production of some insufficient crops. This production will be
organized as large-scale production and will be based on a greater use
of fertilizers, pesticides and fuel.
Table 6: Consumption of fertilizers and agricultural chemicals
on family farms in 1990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
||
| Total |
534266
|
268881
|
554825
|
2906322
|
1517446
|
| Without land |
1461
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Up to 0.1 ha |
4777
|
168
|
93
|
3519
|
567
|
| 0.11-0.50 |
98811
|
9430
|
10588
|
136891
|
32300
|
| 0.51-1.00 |
80873
|
17356
|
25618
|
218683
|
71543
|
| 1.01-2.00 |
109998
|
37933
|
70043
|
444124
|
179088
|
| 2.01-3.00 |
74995
|
37497
|
79746
|
418979
|
208587
|
| 3.01-4.00 |
42498
|
27996
|
62040
|
307087
|
164428
|
| 4.01-5.00 |
37943
|
30682
|
69868
|
309581
|
191796
|
| 5.01-6.00 |
26363
|
25671
|
58554
|
247620
|
160006
|
| 6.01-8.00 |
26867
|
33372
|
73699
|
326404
|
213342
|
| 8.01-10.00 |
16357
|
25952
|
55113
|
234458
|
150336
|
| 10.01-15.00 |
9737
|
17204
|
35827
|
183210
|
103862
|
| 15.01-20.00 |
2157
|
3593
|
7944
|
42644
|
23031
|
| 20.00 ha and more |
1429
|
2020
|
5686
|
33122
|
18560
|
It is anticipated that pre-war consumption of fertilizers will not be reached until the year 2 000 (750 000 tonnes). Not until 2010 do we expect to reach the current average European level of 225 kg of consumption of active ingredients per hectare of arable land. From this aspect, a potentially greater risk exists for the environment because of poor technical equipment used by family farms and big losses in the usage of chemicals, which means their retention in the soil and in the air. There is a general intention to direct this increased consumption to the rational and purposeful consumption of ecologically acceptable substances. In achieving this goal, state support measures and professional help services are inevitable.
Table 7: Consumption of energy inputs in 1996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Diesel, t |
44 246
|
39 928
|
4 336
|
274 236
|
318 500
|
| Petrol, t |
1 824
|
1 728
|
95
|
-
|
1 824
|
| Oil, t |
3 186
|
3 120
|
66
|
11 792
|
14 979
|
| Electricity, thousand kWh |
75 488
|
73 056
|
2 462
|
330 176
|
405 664
|
Current production levels of most of agricultural products in Croatia
are insufficient, and the yields of some crops, especially in the family
farm sector, are significantly below those technologically achievable.
Naturally, one of the most important factors in a comparatively fast and
considerable increase in yields in Croatian conventional agriculture is
an increased quantity of applied fertilizers and pesticides. The enlargement
of family farm production capacities is currently supported in Croatia,
which likely implies a greater endangering of the environment by increased
agricultural production. Intensive agricultural production within Croatian
family farms is based on conventional production, and just a small number
of these farms, mostly small-sized, choose to produce "ecologically". More
than two thirds of family farms have a size less than three hectares, and
most of their production is based on traditional production, technical
far from modern technological standards. A basic limiting factor in fitting
the concept of sustainable agriculture into domestic production is reflected
in inadequate technical equipment and the low level of knowledge of agricultural
producers when adopting new technologies and production methods. The general
unwillingness of producers and agronomists to accept this concept arises
from doubts about its ability to satisfy production-consumption balances
in a country where the level of self-sufficiency has not yet been achieved.
Besides, in planning the future development of sustainable agriculture,
one economic reason is very important; namely, for efficient agricultural
production under current economic circumstances and domestic production
support system, conventional agriculture is much more acceptable regardless
of the existence of one consumer segment in bigger consumer centres that
has the interests in "ecological" quality goods, and is ready to pay higher
prices for these products.
The results of scientific research work in Croatia point to low
levels of contamination in both surface and ground waters. Agriculture
has a particularly small impact on this contamination. Agricultural production
is carried out in compliance with legal regulations covering water protection
(Water classification statutes3 and Statutes
on dangerous substances in water4). The potentially
harmful impact on waters can be expected from ex-social, large-scale farms,
but their market production is controlled by a legal system with an extremely
high level of water protection. There are legal regulations determining
the ways of disposing waste and agricultural by-products. Family farms
reaching a level of production who's waste could be harmful for waters
are also included in these regulations (as agricultural crafts or enterprises).
When they sell their products on the market, they have to obey regulations
determining the control of waste.
During the war the quantity of water for irrigation was considerably
decreased. Surface irrigation, using natural watercourses, became the predominant
method. According to 1997 data, about 1 786 hectares of arable land and
gardens have been irrigated, as well as 256 hectares of orchards and 284
hectares of the rest of arable land.
Table 8: Water used for irrigation thousands m3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
63 068
|
58 512
|
10 357
|
9 597
|
12 094
|
| Underground waters |
558
|
2 204
|
448
|
232
|
144
|
| Watercourses |
62 445
|
1 300
|
8 658
|
9 000
|
11 755
|
| Lakes |
-
|
450
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
| Reservoirs |
5
|
54 000
|
3
|
-
|
-
|
| Other |
60
|
558
|
1 248
|
365
|
195
|
Table 9: Irrigated areas in hectares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Irrigated area total |
3 616
|
1 554
|
3 046
|
2 291
|
2 326
|
| On surface |
3 334
|
235
|
2 932
|
2 244
|
2 252
|
| By sprinkling |
276
|
1 319
|
114
|
47
|
74
|
| Drop by drop |
6
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
According to legal regulations on water protection, agricultural
production is encouraged to implement correct soil fertilization and the
regular harmonizing of nitrogen and phosphorus, due to soil characteristics.
Therefore, several professional agricultural support services are engaged
in promotingthe goal of preserving water quality (both surface and ground).
This is achieved by supporting the system of "permanent green" areas, and
shortening the period of "grassless" (bleak) soil, thus reducing soil erosion
caused by water. When building livestock and processing capacities in agriculture,
all regulations regarding the preservation of surface and ground waters
should be respected. The combination of all mentioned activities provides
a positive contribution to environment protection on the principle of intensive
agriculture combined with the preservation of water quality.
A lack of economic efficiency is a cause for the use of more simple
irrigation systems, which in most cases irrationally use large quantities
of water. Only in narrow Mediterranean areas and in eastern parts of the
Panonian region, where there is a small deficit in water supply, for some
sorts of fruit and vegetables it is economically justified to set up complex
irrigation systems.
Measurements by the State Department for Meteorology show that 60
percent of SO2 in the air comes from abroad (Western European
countries), while 40 percent arises from "domestic" industrial sources.
Agriculture contributes with high emission rates of methane, nitric monoxide
and ammonia because of its nature and conventional way of production. Agriculture's
share in total emissions of CH4 is about 25 percent, in emission
of N2O it is 66 percent, and of NH4 almost 70 percent.
Table 10: Air pollutant emission annually, in tonnes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
| Total |
106723
|
49987
|
129993
|
279976
|
430134
|
16370537
|
17425
|
33986
|
| Other |
106723
|
49974
|
62618
|
66736
|
430105
|
16355942
|
4756
|
2830
|
| Agriculture |
-
|
-
|
-
|
69643
|
-
|
-
|
10395
|
23796
|
| Nature |
-
|
13
|
67735
|
143597
|
29
|
14595
|
2274
|
7360
|
|
|
||||||||
| Total |
57980
|
56612
|
143059
|
242492
|
522109
|
16828
|
18550
|
30418
|
| Other |
57680
|
56607
|
79417
|
37439
|
522104
|
16823
|
4059
|
2632
|
| Agriculture |
-
|
-
|
-
|
61141
|
-
|
-
|
12204
|
20452
|
| Nature |
-
|
5
|
63642
|
143912
|
5
|
5
|
2287
|
7334
|
The impact of agriculture on the environment is reflected primarily in its impact on the soil and water, while effect on air pollution is negligible. However, the concentration of livestock, as well as intensive use of pesticides and fuel in conventional agricultural production contribute to air pollution, that is to acid rains and the destruction of the ozone layer. These negative consequences of conventional agriculture for air pollution could be diminished through organizing livestock farms of smaller size, and the professional use of agricultural chemicals. Statutes5 also regulate the problem of the collection and usage of liquid manure, which annually reaches an amount of 40-60 m3/ha, depending on specific soil porosity. Besides, these statutes also determine the professional use of fertilizers and corresponding obligations of the Extension service, as well as ways of determining and measuring the level of air contamination.
Intensive crop production characterized by reduced crop rotation
and the intensive use of agrochemicals and heavy machines is a significant
cause of soil damage. Further more, emissions by certain industries into
environment cause air contamination and acid rains, more so than waste
depositories and the use of fossil fuels in urban centres and in traffic.
The total amount of waste from agriculture is about 425 thousand tonnes.
More than 80 percent of those substances are delivered to other economic
activities to be either processed or harmlessly removed.
Table 11: Amount of waste removal in 1996 in tonnes
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
425 472
|
425 361
|
111
|
0
|
|||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
425 472
|
22 280
|
54 959
|
759
|
9 212
|
337 389
|
873
|
Together with its contribution to pollution and the endangering of the environment, agriculture also takes part in investments and expenditures for the environment. The highest share it contributes in investments and expenditures is for the protection of surface waters and for the harmless elimination of waste.
Table 12: Fixed capital formation and expenditure for environmental
protection in 1996, in thousands US$
|
|
|
|
against noise |
of air |
|
|
||
|
|
||||||||
| Total |
31 609
|
10 209
|
8 808
|
91
|
2 510
|
8 977
|
1 014
|
|
| Agriculture |
401
|
190
|
211
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
|
|
||||||||
| Total |
37580
|
23 836
|
9 386
|
344
|
79
|
890
|
3 045
|
|
| Agriculture |
463
|
119
|
314
|
0
|
0
|
6
|
25
|
|
It is well known that agriculture is one of more important reasons
for decreasing biodiversity on Earth. There is no doubt that future agricultural
activity will depend on genetic diversity and on the ability of experts
to find and choose, from among various species and sorts, adequate types
of plants and animals. These should be resistant to negative external influences,
highly efficient in energy input use, and adaptable to changes in production
technology and consumer demands. For the purpose of genetic resource protection,
Croatia follows the recommendations of the World Congress of National Parks
and Protected Areas (Caracas, 1993) which has defined the basic principles
and determinants of biological resources protection.
In Croatia, the drainage system is applied to about 19.6 percent of
arable land, and irrigation is carried out on only 0.29 percent of the
total area. Considering such a small area, it is believed that agriculture
has not affected biodiversity – the disappearance of swamp vegetation,
wildlife (game) and ornithofauna. As in the past ten years, there was no
agricultural production on most of the irrigated land (because of the war),
and it thus seemed that the greatest part of that land had been "given
back" to nature. It would be easy to reactivate that land, but in doing
so relevant experiences from the developed world would have to be taken
into account.
The most endangered areas from the aspect of biodiversity are the basins
of the rivers Drava and Neretva in the northern and southern parts of Croatia
respectively. This is because intensive agricultural production is concentrated
in relatively small areas, so nitrate inflows are greater than in other
parts of the state, and soil erosion is therefore increased. Environmental
pollution due to intensive agriculture has caused some damage in biodiversity.
The future could bring a greater impact of agriculture on biodiversity
in rural areas, especially in mountainous regions, where intensive agricultural
development is stimulated by agricultural policy measures. However, the
current legislative framework strongly protects naitonal parks and game
reserves, so it is expected that conventional agricultural production development
will be excluded form these areas.
The protection and improvement of the air quality in Croatia is
the first step in achieving the general goal of protecting human health,
flora and fauna, cultural and material values. Top priority in this process
is given to decreasing local air contamination. First, the problem of contamination
by particles and sulphur dioxide has to be settled. Then, next on the priority
list comes decreasing contamination from traffic and specific industrial
plants. Currently, air quality in settlements is mostly in category I –
clean or insignificantly contaminated (recommended values for air quality
are not exceeded) and in category II – moderately contaminated air (recommended
values are exceeded, but limits for air quality are not exceeded). The
worst air quality, which means category III – over-contaminated air (air
quality limits exceeded) – is in Zagreb, Rijeka, Split and Kutina. Bigger
sources of emission are petroleum refineries, thermo-electric power plants,
organic-chemical industry and cement works. From a total of 24 identified
major sources within the INA6, there
is 8 such sources, 6 sources within the HEP7,
with the 5 remaining sources being in the .cement industry.
Resolving the problem of overall atmospheric (ozone) contamination
needs to be coordinated with Croatian's role in the specific contamination
of the stratosphere. The fulfilment of Croatian commitments according to
the Montreal Protocol regarding this problem should not be a problem, considering
that Croatia is only an importer, and not a producer, of substances harmful
to the ozone. The total production of those substances in Croatia in 1995
was about 0.09 kg/capita, which was significantly lower than the 0.3 kg/capita
consumption in developed countries. The State directorate for environment
and nature protection authorizing the achievement of the Montreal Protocol
in collaboration with the National programme body and with the professional
and financial support of UNEP, in 1996 made the "National programme for
the gradual removal of ozone-harmful stuffs".
With regard to emission of CO2, its contribution to the
"Greenhouse effect" and climate change exceeds some 55 percent. While it
is not possible to decrease that emission, but, a 50 percent increase in
relation to 1990 should be expected (5.1 tonnes/capita), which in fact
would still be 20 percent less than the actual average level of emissions
in Europe as a whole. Creating a policy of global climate protection, it
is important to notice that in 1990 Croatia was within one third of those
countries having the lowest level of emissions. After decreasing emission
in the period 1990-1995 (24 million tonnes to 15.6 million tonnes), our
situation has improved. Consequently, in Croatia there is no need for further
rigid standards of emissions. For other greenhouse gasses (CH4
and N2O), it is technically possible to decrease them.
Erosion is a process whereby soil particles, due to the natural influences
of water and wind, are separated from the soil mass and transported a certain
distance. More than 90 percent of soils are subjected to varying intensities
of erosion. Within 1.3 million hectares of Karst, erosion has already reached
bedrock. The worst problem in this respect lies is in the central and coastal
areas of the Istria region, due to an increased tendency of the soil to
be eroded, with 100-200 tonnes of eroded material per hectare annually.
A similar situation exists in the Neretva River delta, where greater amounts
of soil particles come from neighbouring Bosnia and Herzegovina. For some
time now, there has been a trend in Croatia toward decreasing areas of
agricultural land due to its reassignment; namely, the pressure of both
non-agricultural activities and urbanization, which in the period 1965-1987
resulted in the loss of 166 441 hectares of agricultural soils, or 7 235
hectares per year. Likewise, from the aspect of the utilization of agricultural
land, great importance has to be put on mined agricultural areas. It is
estimated that about 25 percent of deserted and uncultivated agricultural
land in Croatia is totally or partly mined. Such areas, especially in rural
regions, will be an integral part of agricultural land utilization problems
in Croatia for a long time. This is because of the complexity of the mined
areas, inadequate plans for their clearing, and a lack of technical and
financial resources.
The State Directorate for the Protection of Nature and the Environment
is responsible for environmental protection and the protection of nature.
It is responsible for creating regulations, administrative controls and
other professional activities in the sphere of environmental protection.
This means creating a general environmental policy toward providing a framework
for sustainable development as follows:
Environmental protection relating to agriculture is defined primarily
by legal regulations and statutes for the protection of national resources
(soil, water and air), and by regulations for the usage of inputs harmful
to the environment. This ecological approach is also represented in the
legal procedures necessary for the construction and carrying out of agricultural
production and the processing of agricultural products.
The Law on the protection of nature (NN 30/94 and 72/94) ensures
the integral preservation of environmental quality and biodiversity. Among
the established goals of environment protection, it prescribes the constant
preservation of biodiversity originality and ecological balance. Based
on this Law, about 7.5 percent of Croatian territory is now covered by
its protection. Eight categories of space protection are determined: national
parks, natural parks, strict and special wildlife refuges, outstanding
natural features of nature, protected landscapes, park-forests and monuments
of park architecture. This Law also protects some plant and animal species.
While primarily so these are not only endangered or rare species in Croatia,
but also those endangered on an international scale too. Thus we are obligated
by international conventions to protect them. It is forbidden to kill,
catch, hurt, capture, buy, sell, export or import these protected species,
and it is also forbidden to cause damage to their habitats. All wild animals
in national parks and wildlife refuges are protected, together with complete
cave fauna.
The protection of animals that can be exploited economically is prescribed
by numerous other laws too, such as the Law on hunting (NN 10/94,
22/94, 5/95, 25/96), the Law on fresh-water fishing (NN 34/89, 19/90,
26/93) and Law on sea fishing (NN 74/94, 57/96). The economic exploitation
of other unprotected species is regulated by the issuing of licenses for
their collection from their natural habitat, and these are issued by the
state administrative body responsible for environmental protection. This
refers mostly to snails and green frogs.
The great majority of native mammals are also protected, with the exemption
of some "problematic" and hunted species. All nest birds and all kinds
of European birds are protected as well, except fish-eaters and waders
near fishponds and starlings near agricultural areas. In the case of reptiles,
increasingly endangered by the recent "home pets" trade, all native species
are protected, except the horned viper and the common adder, a amphibians
are protected too, except for three kinds of green frogs. The protection
of other species is faced with the problems of a lack of scientific data
and poor information about domestic fauna.
Concerning plant species, only 44 are currently protected, but the
preparation of regulations is under way for the protection of all species
registered on Croatia’s red list. The protection of habitats in areas
exploited economically is improved by the fulfilment of certain directions
for nature protection in agricultural, forestry, water-management, space
planning and other services. With the Law on forests (NN 92/90,
76/93) the procedure has been established for forests and forestry land.
A fixed payment for the utilization of general benefits from forests has
to be paid which is prescribed by laws for all business entities in Croatia.
Regarding indigenous species of cultivated plants and domestic animals,
measures for their protection are also required. The Law on financial support
in agriculture and fisheries (NN 46/97) ensures specific help for breeding
certain indigenous breeds (Istrian cattle, pigs from Turopolje and Slavonia,
sheep, goats, turkeys).
Basic laws and directives on the use of inputs are as follows:
The Main laws and regulations for the protection of natural resources
in Croatia are the following:
There are no special activities for the promotion of ecologically
oriented agricultural practices. The Measures and activities of different
civil associations (of producers or traders) have no specific legal framework
at the state level. There are some government institutions oriented toward
the promotional and executive activities of environmental protection. However,
in the sphere of agriculture, only a few civil associations and individuals
within scientific institutions are oriented to bio-dynamic and sustainable
agricultural production, although still only in a limited way.
Croatia has a long tradition in the functioning of non-government
associations. It is estimated that there are currently between 150 and
200 non-government associations engaged in environment protection, of which
one-third are in Zagreb. These associations operate mostly at a local level,
having no permanently employed workers or office, and faced with the problem
of recruiting members. Their financial situation is poor, lacking monetary
means for the fulfilment of even the simplest tasks. Most of them have
an annual budget of less than US$6 000.
For the last few years in Croatia there has been an active civil
movement for "healthy life", the production of "healthy food", biodynamic
management, and the like. It is estimated that there are about 30 active,
registered civil associations, which in their statutes contain some form
of sustainable agriculture concept.
During the period 1992-1996, a number of international institutions
have financed projects, programmes and various other activities related
to environment protection, either with or without repayment. The number
of grants has increased since 1992, with the highest level being reached
in 1995. Such a tendency is characteristic of state institutions, institutes
and faculties, while for non-government associations this trend continued
until 1996. The Republic of Croatia is also involved in the 1992-1996 Regional
Programme for the Protection of the Environment in the Danube River Basin,
partly financed by GEF, with a total amount of US$12 690 000. A Phare programme
also finances the Programme, but this source is still unavailable for Croatia.
Additionally, environmental protection is financed by loans from the World
Bank, and by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Besides
the projects directly relating to environmental protection, these loans
are directed to support Croatian economy and agriculture as a whole, from
the aspect of sustainable development.
The growth of production is the main strategic objective of Croatian
agriculture. This should be achieved by a quality re-assessment of production
resources on family farms as the basic support of agriculture. In the near
future, the greater enlargement of farm size is expected, as well as an
improvement in technical equipment and the implementation of modern production
technology on a greater number of commercial farms. Anticipated technological
progress in agriculture implies a potential danger for the environment,
and special attention needs to be applied to this in the future.
Traditional methods of production, together with the unfavourable economic
situation of family farms owning the great majority of production resources
in agriculture, have caused a decrease in the use of inputs that could
be harmful to the environment. As a result of the limited release of contaminating
materials from agriculture into the soil, water and air, Croatia is an
insignificant polluter in comparison with the majority of European countries.
Unfortunately, most emissions of harmful material are "imported" into Croatia
from neighbouring developed countries.
Global agriculture has to be oriented toward "ecologically" conscious
production, and thus must be stimulated by legislation together with scientific
research and the support of professional services. Sustainable land management,
integrated pest management, and plant nutrition systems are the basic elements
of a sustainable agriculture concept, and represent a radical change and
a new way of thinking with regard to existing production. Such a change
will require greater professional knowledge and an increase in producers'
skills so that a professional service will be qualified to provide assistance.
"Fundamentals" and basic principles of sustainable land management, as
defined by the FAO – productivity, stability of yields, natural resources
protection, economic efficiency and social acceptability – are acceptable
and usable in Croatia. The basic purpose of research work is national resources
protection, and soil protection in particular. This research includes identifying
and permanently monitoring the type and intensity of damage, as well as
organizing a reliable and contemporary information soil system. Only scientific
research, based on exact quantitative data, can give reliable solutions
to numerous problems involved in the future management of agriculture.
In order to protect the soil, as a basic national resource, it is necessary
to establish a system of collecting detailed information about soil conditions,
and the influences of natural factors and human activities on the soil,
as well as about damaging processes and soil contamination. That is why
the State Directorate for the Protection of Nature and the Environment
has begun the organization of a data base of habitats of the Republic of
Croatia, which is the basic prerequisite condition for completing the scientific
soil inventory – the Elementary Pedology Map of the Republic of Croatia.
Together with a manual about pedology in environment protection, it creates
the basis for scientifically-based planning and decision making in the
sustainable land management process.
Bašić, F. & Hrlec, G. 1991. Organische Problemstoffe
in den Ackerböden, Kroatiens, Experttagung der gemeinsamen Arbeits-gruppe
Bodenschutz ARGE Alpen, Alpen-Adria und Donauländer, Szombathely, 17-18
Oktober 1991., Sonderdruck Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Landesentwicklung
und Umweltfr. 32-47, München.
Bašić, F., Butorac, A., Vidaček, Ž., Racz, Z., Ostojić, Z. & Bertić, B. 1993. Programme zaštite tala Hrvatske - Inventarizacija stanja - Trajno motrenje - Informacijski sustav, studija, Fond stručne dokumentacije Zavoda za OPB Agronomskog fakulteta, 122, Zagreb.
Bašić, F., Mesić, M., Kisić, I., Jelavić, V., Pravdić, V., Steinbauer, M. & Villi, M. 1993. Danube Integrated Environmental Study, Draft final report, phase I. for the Republic of Croatia, Urbanistički institut Hrvatske, Hasskoning, Royal Dutch Consulting Engineers and Architects, p. 37., Zagreb.
Bašić. F., Grgić Z. & Višnja Jelić-Mück 1995. “Environmental Analysis” Private farm support services project, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Zagreb.
Kisić, I., Bašić, F., Butorac, A. & Mesić, M. 1998. Soil
erosion in different tillage systems on stagnosol in Croatia. 16th World
Congress of Soil Science, Proceedings - CD, p. 7, Montpellier.