Foreword
The economic transition in Central and Eastern European countries brought about significant changes also into the small ruminant production sector. Sheep and goat production, like the entire animal production sector, is forced to adjust its organization, structure and approach to the requirements of the market, while, at the same time - due to the lower standard of living - it becomes an essential subsistence activity for a growing number of household farms.
The genetic improvement, organization of breeding, research, extension services, alternative utilization of small ruminants as well as total quality management were among the main subjects discussed at the international workshop on "Sheep and Goat Husbandry in the Central and Eastern European Countries - A Struggle to Survive " organized in Budapest (Hungary) from 29th November - 3rd December 1997 by the Research Institute for Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Herceghalom, Hungary in close collaboration and sponsorsmurahip of FAO Subregional Office for Central and Eastern Europe, as well as FAO-CIHEAM and the European Association of Animal Production (EAAP). Hundred twenty participants from 22 countries participated in the workshop, which was very timely organized, providing the excellent opportunity for exchange of information and experience, as well as discussing possible options and ways to remedy present difficulties.
The proceedings, presented here, provide complete set of papers delivered during the Workshop as well as summary of a round-table discussion conducted at the end of the Workshop. Final conclusion may be drawn that while some of producers are struggling to survive, the others are meeting the challenge of the change, looking for innovative approaches, diversifying production, introducing total quality management and opening for the market in the attempt to reach the main goal - the long term economical sustainability.
Acknowledgement
The initiative and effort of Dr. Sandor KUKOVICS, Research Institute for Animal Breeding and Nutrition to organize and conduct efficiently the Workshop as well as print the proceedings, is greatly appreciated and acknowledged.
Also excellent organizational arrangements for the Workshop provided by Mrs. Klara BISZKUP is recognised.
The summary of the workshop
Main purpose of the workshop
The aim of the workshop was: to summarize the situation of sheep and goat husbandry in the different countries within the Central and Eastern European region, to get the necessary information about the changes occurring in these countries, about the tendencies and the possible relationships in the future, to determine the possible conditions for the future development in the region.
Participants
There were eighty participants attending the technical tour, while one hundred took part in the workshop. In addition to participants for Central and European Countries experts from France, Germany. United Kingdom, Italy, Spain and Greece were also present. In total 24 countries were represented.
The programme of the workshop
Breeding livestock as well as sheep and goat products exhibition
Within the animal show, those sheep breeds were
presented which were bred in the north-east region of Hungary. The following
companies and breeds could be seen within the show in Gelej:
· Awassi Corporation, Bakonszeg (Awassi
ewes and female hoggets);
· Bábolna Corporation, Szendr
Branch, Szendr (Suffolk-, Ile de France and Bábolna Tetra ewes and
rams);
· Csenger Co-operative, Tibota Co., Csenger
(Fertile Merino ewes);
· South-Borsod Co-operative for Fish and
Sheep Farming, Gelej (Merino, [Merino x Pleven Blackhead]
F1
- and Pleven F1
x Black East-Friesian ewes);
· Hajdúböszörmény
Star Co-operative, Hajdúböszörmény (Hungarian Merino
and Mutton Merino ewes);
· Hortobágy Public Utility Company
for Environmental Protection and Gene Conservation, Hortobágy (Black-
and White Hortobágy Racka and Transylvanian Racka ewes and rams);
· Ságia Agricultural and Trade Ltd,
Tiszacsege (Texel ewes and rams).
The following sheep and goat products of different
companies were presented within the products exhibition:
· Awassi Corporation, Bakonszeg (different
kinds of curds, cheeses and cottage cheeses, smoked and pickled meat products,
wool products made for the automobile industry);
· South-Borsod Co-operative for Fish and
Sheep Farming, Gelej (different kinds of curds, cheeses and cottage cheeses,
different wool products: blankets, cushions, mattresses, waist-warmers,
etc.,);
· Kistelek M+M Cheese Making Ltd, Kistelek
(different kinds of feta type cheeses, cottage cheeses, light and hard
cheeses);
· University of Veterinary Sciences,
Experimental Institute, Üll-Dóramajor (goat cheeses, goat sausages
and smoked goat meats);
· Agricultural Public Utility Company,
Szarvas (sheep and cow cheeses with different flavours);
· Pilis Goat Farm, Pilisszentlászló
(kefir and different cheeses based on goat milk);
· Gyosa Family Farm, Hajdúszoboszló
(special goat cheeses);
· Nagykunság Goat and Sheep Milk
Producers' Society, Kunhegyes (sheep and goat cheeses);
· Shepard's Cheese Ltd,
Berettyóújfalu (different light and hard cheeses, curds and
cottage cheeses from goats and sheep milk);
· Zemplén Goat Breeders'
Co-operative, Hollóháza (goat cheeses with different
flavours).
Scientific programme
The sessions were started with so-called country reports, following the English alphabetical order; the representatives of four countries in each session presented the situation of sheep and goat breeding in his/her own homeland. These country reports were followed by different papers, short papers and posters.
Session 1.
Session 2.
Session 3.
Session 4.
Round-table discussion
The participants were expected to find the proper
answers to the following questions:
· Which production systems can be managed
most effectively in the region?
· Which are the basic conditions that should
be available for effective management?
· Which are the possible means of improvement
under the present circumstances?
· What are the future possibilities?
Recommendations
The workshop concluded with the following general
recommendations for countries of the region:
· Size of the population of small ruminants
should match market demand and economic profitability.
· Efficient production systems should be
introduced using the most appropriate breeds and technologies.
· The market for sheep and goats and products
made of them, including by-products should be further developed. This should
include an increase in national consumption as well as better utilization
of export opportunities.
· Quality requirements of the market should
be determined, met and maintained with the aim to increase consumer's interest
and confidence in the products.
· An efficient extension system, able to
deliver directly to farmers the most up-to-date scientific and development
results, should be established.
· The proper exploitation of pasture lands,
landscape management as well as environmental protection are of growing
importance and should be pursued.
· Without the integration of producers,
small farms will possibly be unable to survive in the near future, thus the
creation of proper organizations is encouraged.
· A network, linked to FAO-CIHEAM Co-operative
Network on Sheep and Goats, able to assist in harmonization of research and
development activities in the area of small ruminants in the region should
be established.
THE PRESENT STATE OF
SHEEP AND GOAT FARMING
IN ALBANIA
Kume, Kristaq
Livestock Research Institute,
Tirana
Albania
---------------------------------------------
ABSTRACT
---------------------------------------------
INTRODUCTION
For centuries, the Albanian farmer has considered
the sheep and goats as traditional animals. Even nowadays, the growing of
these animals is one of the important directions in animal production. The
statistics of 1996 show that the small ruminants provide 32.6 percent and
18.3 percent of the total national meat and milk production,
respectively.
During the years 1991-1994, in which political
and economic transformations towards the market economy took place, the
populations of these two species significantly increased. In 1995, in comparison
with the year 1991, the population of sheep was about 45 percent greater,
and that of the goats around 43 percent. The year 1996 presents a decrease
in the number of heads for both species: it is about 498 000 heads of
sheep (from these 283 000 ewes) and about 400 000 goats (from these
255 000 does) less.
Among the principal factors which influenced
that decrease, the fraudulent pyramid schemes can be distinguished as a factor
with a strong effect. During this year, many Albanian farmers sold their
animals for meat consumption, with the idea of getting financial means by
being involved in these schemes.
THE SMALL RUMINANTS ON FARMS
There are 421 800 private farms in Albania
and from these 254 000 keep sheep and 213 000 raise goats. In about
40-45 percent of these farms both species are kept, in ratios that vary widely.
The average number of the animals on the farms that keep small ruminants
is different for different zones of Albania. Thus, in the farms situated
on the coastal-plane area, flocks with an average number of 10-15 sheep are
kept, and the average number of goats per flock vary from of 5 to 10 heads.
In the hilly-mountainous zone of southern and south-eastern Albania, the
farms keeping flocks with 40-50 sheep or 50-60 goats are more frequent, while
in Albania's northern, north-eastern and eastern zones, the average number
of sheep per flock varies in the limits of 20-30 heads and that of goats
from 10 to 30 heads. This variability in the size of the flock is determined
to a big part by the surface of the land the private farmers own and also
by the surfaces of the pastures and terrain in communal use. As the average
surface of the arable land per farm in Albania is 1-1.4 hectares, the
availability of the communal pastures presents an important factor influencing
the size of the small ruminants flocks. According to statistical data of
the year 1996, the structure of the farms keeping sheep or goats in Albania
is presented in Table 1.
As can be seen, about 45.7 percent of the farms
keep 1-30 sheep and about 54.3 percent 1-30 goats. A characteristic in Albania
is the existence of small-holder farms. However, during the last three years
the number of farms raising more than 50 goats or sheep has increased from
0.7 percent to 2.0 percent and from 1.2 to 2.4 percent, respectively.
Table 1. The farm structure based on the
number of animals kept
| By number of
goats |
No. of farms
|
% |
By number of
sheep |
No. of farms x 1000 |
% |
| No goats | 208.8 | 49.5 | No sheep | 167.0 | 39.6 |
| with 1-10 goats | 151.4 | 35.9 | with 1-10 goats | 180.9 | 42.9 |
| 11-30 | 41.3 | 9.8 | 11-30 | 48.1 | 11.4 |
| 31-50 | 11.8 | 2.8 | 31-50 | 15.2 | 3.6 |
| 51-100 | 7.2 | 1.7 | 51-100 | 8.4 | 2.0 |
| 101-200 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 101-200 | 0.4 | 0.1 |
| more than 201 | 0.4 | 0.1 | more than 201 | 0.4 | 0.1 |
| Total | 421.8 | 100 | Total | 421.8 | 100 |
THE FARMING SYSTEMS
In general, the small ruminants farming system
in Albania is an extensive one. It is based on the traditional concept of
year-round use of the natural grazing resources. Nevertheless, the
characteristics of this system vary in the function of the flock size and
geo-climatic conditions. Thus, the farmers who keep small flocks with 5-10
heads, group their animals in the pasture during the day under the supervision
of a shepherd, and in the evening keep their flocks in environments close
to the house. The flocks of 70-80 animals, are kept in the stable during
winter and graze in the pastures close to the village, while in summer the
animals are grouped in 2-3 bigger flocks and are transferred to the summer
pastures on the mountain. The flocks of 100-200 animals are in motion all
year. In the period November-March they move to the pastures of the coastal
area and during April-October they move to the mountainous pastures. This
system is especially common in sheep keeping.
The farmers who keep sheep in the lowland area,
in order to fulfil animal feed needs and exploit the natural pastures, use
the grazing of corn harvesting leftovers in the fields and cultivate forages
such as alfalfa and green oat. These are used as green feed and also as hay
during the winter time. In general, the concentrated feeds, principally maize
corn and bran, are used in limited quantities and only 1-2 months before
lambing. During the winter time the farmers of the hilly-mountainous zone
feed the small ruminants with dried oak leaves or hay which have been prepared
during summer. Farms with small ruminants having intensive production systems
are not yet created in Albania, and there are very few sheep flocks where
semi-intensive production systems are applied. The latter are found more
in the lowland area and they are directed toward meat production. The small
ruminants are raised by the Albanian farmers for meat, milk, wool and skin
production, which in a large part are used for family consumption. The principal
direction of the production varies according to the species and the geo-climatic
zones. The goats in Albania are kept for a double purpose: milk and meat.
The milk is consumed as fresh milk and a good part of it is processed into
cheese, sometimes mixed with cow milk. The processing methods are skilled
ones. Usually the milk is processed by the farmers themselves, but local
processors also exist who collect the milk from the farms. The meat production
is realized through raising kids, which are slaughtered after weaning time
or at the age of 3-4 months. In the mountainous zones of Albania, the farmers
use the wool and the skin for clothing and carpets (both sheep and goats).
The direction of production in the sheep kept in different zones of Albania
is different. Actually in the coastal-lowland zone which is more developed
in the social - economical point of view and the most populated zone, which
is more developed in the social-economical point of view and the most populated
one, the principal direction of the production is meat. In the hilly-mountainous
zone the flocks kept principally for milk production predominate. Today,
the wool is considered as a by-product of a little value. The sheep milk
is usually used for family consumption, fresh or processed curd and cheese.
The surplus of the products beyond the quantities for family needs are sent
to the market. Actually the predominant way of marketing milk is selling
it to the milk collectors who further process it. The meat is marketed as
live animals by the farmers themselves. This is done on fixed days of the
week in the markets situated close to the towns. The export of the milk and
its processed products and that of the meat has not yet started. The export
of the skins has developed quick during the last five years. The main
characteristic of the goat genetic fund in Albania, is the existence of the
pure indigenous genetic material. The studies done on the Albanian goat
population have shown that from the evolutionary aspect it may be classified
in primary population groups, in which the process of the standardization
is present. Although a variability among the populations kept in different
geo-climatic zones of Albania exists, the variability in the visible genetic
profile, in the morpho-biometric characteristics, the polymorphism of the
milk proteins and the differences in the production and reproduction figures,
the studies have shown that they can be considered as a genetic entity with
the same origin in which the genetic niches are found. Classifying the goat
populations in ecotypes, based on the surveys and measurements performed,
we get the information shown in Table 2.
These ecotypes take about 27 percent of the
total population. The other part is composed of indigenous goat flocks not
classified in ecotypes and other crosses with the above-mentioned
ecotypes.
THE GOATS
According to the statistical data, the milk
yield per goat in 1996 was 85 kg. This low figure is due to the systems of
production. The Albanian farmer, owing to the lack of the required infrastructure
which could ensure the evaluation of this product through its collection
and processing, is interested in getting a production with the minimum material
and financial means possible. At the same time, we must emphasize that the
genetic capacity of the Albanian goat is much higher; e.g., in selected and
well managed flocks, especially with feed at an acceptable level, the Velipoja
ecotype has produced 520 kg milk/goat/year and the Mati ecotype achieved
430 kg /goat/year. In Albania only two goat breeds, in a limited number,
are imported: Saanen and Alpine. The actual population of Saanen goats is
350 heads, and its crosses with the local breeds make 3200 goats. The Alpine
breed is represented by a flock of 80 goats and its crosses of 200-220 heads.
The Albanian farmer is interested in both breeds and he actually keeps them
according to the concept "the goat of the family", meaning 1-2 goats per
family. Their F1 crosses, according to our surveys, have expressed very good
qualities. The milk production data got under extensive keeping conditions
are about 90-120 percent higher. Meanwhile, the animals have inherited and
expressed good qualities in facing the difficult environmental
conditions.
Table 2. Average data for the goat ecotypes
in Albania
E C O T Y P E S |
||||||||||
Description |
Unit |
Dragobi |
Has |
Velipoje |
Mat |
capore |
Shyte |
Liqenas |
Dukat |
Muzhake |
Number (goats) |
Heads |
10 000 |
50 000 |
3 300 |
80 000 |
25 000 |
2 000 |
10 000 |
14 000 |
45 000 |
Withers height |
Cm |
56-68 |
58-73 |
57-72 |
57-73 |
53-71 |
54-70 |
64-72 |
51-63 |
54-68 |
Live weight goat |
Kg |
48-56 |
49-58 |
44-55 |
43-52 |
41-52 |
44-53 |
42-50 |
25-32 |
29-37 |
L. Weight
|
Kg |
76-89 |
87-97 |
68-79 |
68-81 |
65-76 |
67-80 |
65-78 |
40-46 |
43-52 |
Birth LW Males |
Kg |
1.9-2.6 |
1.9-2.7 |
2.1-3.1 |
1.9-2.9 |
1.6-2.1 |
1.72.2 |
1.6-2.2 |
1.2-2.0 |
1.4-2.6 |
Birth LW Females |
Kg |
1.6-2.2 |
1.6-2.6 |
2.0-3.0 |
1.9-2.0 |
1.5-2.0 |
1.5-2.0 |
1.4-2.0 |
1.0-2.0 |
1.1-2.4 |
Weaning LW Mal |
Kg |
10-13 |
12-16 |
12-15 |
10-13 |
7-10 |
7-9 |
7-9 |
5-8 |
6-10 |
Weaning LW Fem |
Kg |
9-12 |
11-14 |
10-13 |
4-12 |
6-9 |
6-8 |
6-8 |
4-8 |
5-10 |
Milk yield |
Kg |
100-220 |
90-210 |
130-240 |
105-240 |
120-230 |
110-190 |
90-220 |
80-190 |
80-230 |
Prolificity |
% |
100-112 |
95-110 |
105-115 |
105-120 |
90-105 |
90-105 |
100-110 |
100-105 |
100-105 |
SHEEP BREEDS
During the last 40 years, in the biggest part
of the sheep population, crossing with the imported breeds has been applied.
Different Merino and Tcigaya types are found in it. The intention has been
the increase of the wool yield, in quantity and quality, and the improvement
of the milk yield, as well. The aim of these crosses is the improvement of
the morpho-biometrical figures and animals' live weight. In general, the
crosses were not implemented in the framework of a national programme with
clear objectives and defined ways. A consequence of that is the existence
of a high variability among the flocks, especially in the coastal-lowland
part of Albania where about 350 000 sheep, or 25 percent of the population,
are kept. Actually, a new strategy on sheep breed improvement is being applied
in Albania. In the coastal-lowland part of the country the implementation
of the terminal crossing with the Ile de France breed is foreseen, while
in the hilly-mountainous zones the local sheep will continue to be improved
through the crossing until F2 with Tcigaya and Awassi breeds and Bardhoka
indigenous breed with the objective to increase first the milk yield and
secondly the live weight and meat production quality. Besides the indigenous
sheep known as "Rrecka" in the central, southern and south-eastern Albania,
the indigenous sheep genetic fund is localized in the northern and north-eastern
zones. In this area it is preserved as a purebred. The main average data
of the local breeds are given in Table 3.
Table 3. The average data for the sheep of
the local breed
Breed |
Number
|
Live
|
Wither
|
Production
milk wool
|
fertility
|
Birth.l.weig
M F kg kg |
weaning.l.weig
M F kg kg |
||||||
| Rrecka | 182.0 | 30-35 |
40-45 |
40-50 |
1.2 |
105 |
1.8 |
1.6 |
10.1 |
9.3 |
|||
| Ruda | 114.0 | 44-46 |
56-58 |
80 -110 |
1.4 |
16 |
2.6 |
2.4 |
13.5 |
13.0 |
|||
| Bardhoke | 61.8 | 46-50 |
58-64 |
90 -130 |
2.0 |
110 |
2.4 |
2.1 |
13.0 |
12.4 |
|||
| Shkodrane | 24.6 | 36-39 |
40-45 |
80-90 |
2.5 |
110 |
2.2 |
2.0 |
11.2 |
10.8 |
|||
| Bace | 22.2 | 42-45 |
50-56 |
100-110 |
2.3 |
115 |
2.5 |
2.3 |
13.2 |
12.7 |
|||
| Lare e Matit | 9.0 | 33-35 |
40-45 |
60-65 |
1.2 |
110 |
2.1 |
1.8 |
11.2 |
10.5 |
|||
| Lare e Polisit | 3.5 | 30-35 |
40-46 |
60-65 |
1.3 |
108 |
2.0 |
1.7 |
11.0 |
10.5 |
|||
Actually, in Albania the total number of the
small ruminants is found in private ownership. Every farmer keeps his animals
and they are not leased. The same applies for the barns. Only the natural
pastures near the village are in communal use. The alpine summer pastures
are property of the state and they are rented to the farmers to exploit them.
The pastures are also leased in the coastal-lowland zones where the animals
from the mountainous areas of Albania come to pass the winter period.
In general, on the farms with small-size flocks,
it is the family that looks after the animals. Also frequent used is the
system where some family farms group their animals into big flocks and pay
a shepherd to care for them. The payment is done in animal products: milk,
meat or wool. In the migrating flocks two practices are frequent: either
the farmer himself cares for the animals, or he employs a shepherd to look
after the flock and is paid in goods. The most frequent lambing system in
Albania is the annual one. In the coastal-lowland area the lambing starts
at the end of November and in the mountainous areas it is concluded by the
end of February. In some cases the culling ewes are stimulated with G.S.P.M
and new lambing out of season is taken. The goats too, kid annually during
the period January-March, with respect to the geo-climatic zones in which
they are found.
As mentioned above, the Albanian farmer feeds
the small ruminants by exploitation of the environment grazing capacities.
The purchased feed, mainly maize corn or bran, make a small percentage of
the feeding ration. All this is due to the lack of a market which could absorb
the animal products, and to the low economic level of the farmer. Influential
is the fact that the average farm size is very small and the family farm
has to get everything from it. This explains why the farm mechanization level
is very low, too. Further, the credit system in Albania, which could strongly
exert its effect on the mechanization level, is very fragile and operates
with much difficulty, and in general it can be considered as an inactive
one.
ORGANIZATIONS
The processes of farming farmers' co-operatives
are in the first steps. Actually, only the National Small Ruminants Production
Association is institutionalized and it has so far had a modest activity
and geographical extension. Such a fact is a consequence of the low development
level of the Albanian farm and the need, yet without real support, for its
further development. In a more general sense, this is a consequence of the
economic level of the Albanian society. Nevertheless, as a need of the process
of the production, often farmers have sought and realized the co-operation
among them. They particularly feel this co-operation in the realization of
the exchange of the breeding material and in the establishment of the rules
for the communal use of the natural feed resources. The groups of farmers
keeping the sheep of Rude, Bardhoke and Shkodrane breeds and those of such
goat ecotypes as Mati, Dragobi, Dukati, Liqenasi, Muzhake etc., in flocks
of more than 50 animals, have extended their co-operation in milk collection
and marketing. Such organizations, however, remain at the level of fulfilling
needs of the moment. These are not yet institutionalized as organizations
which could undertake and solve, at the required technical level, the complex
problems of animal production.
Taking into consideration the farmers' low
co-operation level and being aware of the importance of the technical
information, the Albanian government has undertaken and is realizing the
creation and the development of the structures which must provide the technical
advice and technology transfer to the private farms. This process is developing
according to the strategy designed by the Ministry of Agriculture and Food
in collaboration with its research institutes and with the financial and
technical support from international organizations. Actually, in Albania
governmental structures are created and operate which are responsible for
producing the messages and all the required information for the transfer
of in the production technology innovations, but at the same time, practically
realize this transfer to the farmer's level. The aim is to provide the Albanian
farmer with the required help and technical assistance needed for solving
his problems. Actually this assistance is focused upon the problems of feeding
small ruminants according to the different physiological situations, the
ways to efficiently use of the natural feed resources, the problems of animal
health and reproduction, housing and milk processing. Concerning breed
improvement problems, under the actual conditions found in Albania, we can
say that the possibilities for their scientific treatment are limited. What
can be done today is only the organization of fairs and exhibitions through
which the evaluation of the best reproducers may be realized and the exchange
of the genetic material may take place among the farmers. Geo-climatic conditions
and the quantity of the spontaneous vegetation cover have always favoured
the development of small ruminants in Albania. Having that as a main activity,
the Albanian farmer has found solutions which harmonize well development
with the requirements for environmental protection. Special care is shown
for the forest protection and we can say that, in general, the sylviculture
and the small ruminants, especially the goats, are complementary to each
other.
MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMY
The main scope of the management of small ruminants in small flocks, is the provision of animal products for family needs. This and the lack of a real possibility for data collection and financial-economic information from the farms of such size, makes their economic evaluation very difficult. Yet, we can state that the bigger the flock size, the higher the economic profitability. Two of the principal needs of the farmers who are more specialized in keeping small ruminants are: to get low interest credit to build milk processing units and to establish the structures which could realize the marketing of the animal products.
SHEEP AND GOAT HUSBANDRY IN BOSNIA AND
Muratovi, S. Brodlija, K.
Domba,
E. Farm of sheep husbandry
Faculty of Agriculture Kakanj
Sarajevo Bosnia and Herzegovina
---------------------------------------------
ABSTRACT
Bosnia and Herzegovina has some 5.1 million hectares of land, half of which is agricultural and a further 45 percent is covered in forests. Within the agricultural land area, about 40 percent is arable, 55 percent is meadows and pastures and 5 percent is orchards and vineyards.
In the same year, the average milk and wool yield of the ewes were 30 litres and 1.3 kilograms, the reproduction level was 102 percent.
---------------------------------------------
INTRODUCTION
Bosnia and Herzegovina is situated in Southeastern
Europe. It is almost land-locked and has a continental climate except for
the immediate hinterland of the Dalmatian coast, which has a Mediterranean
climate.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has about 5.1 million
hectares of land, half of which is agricultural and a further 45 percent
is covered by forests. Within the agricultural land area, about 40 percent
is arable, 55 percent is meadows and pastures and 5 percent is orchards and
vineyards.
Historically, settlement has been in the valleys,
with individual sheep farms at higher altitudes.
STATUS OF SHEEP AND GOATS HUSBANDRY
IN 1991
The number of sheep by category in Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1991 was as follows:
Table 1. Number of sheep by category and ownership (in `000 heads) in B&H
Item |
Total number |
Ownership, % |
|
Private |
"Organized" |
||
Ewes |
971 |
99.0 |
1.0 |
Other sheep |
346 |
99.1 |
0.9 |
Total sheep |
1 317 |
99.0 |
1.0 |
Table 2 contains the average production of sheep milk, wool and sheep slaughtered in the private sector in 1991.
Table 2. Average production milk, wool and slaughtered sheep
Year |
milk/ewe/year, kg |
wool/sheep/year, kg |
slaughtered sheep |
1991 |
30 |
1.3 |
1.02 |
One of the main reasons for low production on
the individual farms is the absence of scientific research work and extension
services with farmers for many years (80 years).
The goat population is relatively low as a result
of an edict prohibiting their husbandry since 1951. This appears to have
been considered as a soil and forestry conservation measure and the keeping
of goats are still regarded as controversial by a number of observers.
STATUS OF SHEEP AND GOAT HUSBANDRY IN 1997
The reconstruction of small ruminant livestock
sector in Bosnia and Herzegovina need settling statistics data.
Recently, we have visited two locations (Travnik
and Livno) and collected some data.
The Travnik area in 1991 had 49 000 sheep,
and now the number of sheep has decreased to 22 000 (breed Pramenka
- Vlai). The number of sheep in a flock is 60 heads (22-150). Farmers have
about 1.5 ha of land (average) on the Vlai Mountain. In the summer, feeding
of the sheep is conducted on the Vlai's grassland. During the wintertime
(November to April) farmers go to North Bosnia (areas Tuzla, Brko,
Biha).
The Livno area in 1991 had 20 000 heads
of sheep and now number of the sheep is about 5 000. Ten individual
farms have about 200 heads of sheep. Other farmers have an average 10-20
heads of sheep. Summer feeding of sheep is on the mountain Cincar, nearby
Livno (10 km). During the wintertime, farmers come back to villages
of the Livno area. Farmers have an average 4.0 ha of land in the Field of
Livno.
MARKETS FOR SHEEP PRODUCTS
Markets are a very important economic factor
in sheep production. They directly determine the trend and scope of production,
although sheep are only assets and important to people living in mountainous
areas. The market includes a sheep market and, last time, a goat market,
as well as their products.
The market for lambs (meat) and cheese is very
active; these factors enhance and stimulate development of small ruminant
production. For example, Livno and Travnik cheese production grows very fast,
because of the high quality as well as high prices.
At this time sheep and goat husbandry need
protection of ancient breed reproductive lambs.
CONCLUSIONS
Implementation of a rehabilitation programme
in sheep and goat husbandry should include serious extension and rehabilitation
of scientific research work; also, the State programme of domestic breeds'
protection and development should be included.
Bosnia and Herzegovina needs the assistance
and support of the International community in its struggle to preserve sheep
and goat husbandry.
REFERENCES
Livestock rehabilitation project in Bosnia
and Herzegovina - implementation. Third joint EAAP/FAO workshop for European
National Coordinators, Vienna, Austria, 1997.
Annually statistic's report of BiH, Sarajevo,
1992.
PRESENT SITUATION IN SHEEP AND GOAT FARMING OF BULGARIA
Dimov, Doytcho
Agricultural University of
Plovdiv
Department of Animal Husbandry,
Plovdiv 4000, Bulgaria
---------------------------------------------
ABSTRACT
According to different geographical locations
(lowlands, hills or mountains), different breeds exist. Bulgaria has a great
diversity of genetic resources for sustainable sheep and goat farming. These
genetic resources need better monitoring and management.
In the beginning of 1997, 98.89 percent of sheep
and 99.95 percent of goats were in private ownership, but 83.17 percent of
pastures are state or communal. During the grazing period all herds feed
on communal pastures. Lots of work on sheep and goat farms is done by hand.
At the end of 1995 the Ministry of Agriculture
started a project for building the National Agricultural Advisory System
(NAAS). NAAS can be considered as a prototype of an "Extension Services"
system.
The basic weakness of sheep and goat husbandry
in Bulgaria is the lack of integral connection between farmers, processing
and marketing of sheep and goat products.
The present production system is very difficult
to manage. Existing farmers' and breeding organizations are new organizations
with insufficient experience and resources to protect the economic interests
of the new farmers. Also missing are well-trained people for effective management
of sheep and goat production.
The purpose of the new government is to create
favourable conditions for production without active intervention in the
production sector. In this situation farmers' initiative is of great importance
for successful development of sheep and goat farming. The presence of effective
farmers' and breeding organizations is a key factor to achieve sustainability
of the sheep and goat industry.
In the present situation, possible means to
improve production systems are: (i) a careful study of the present production
system; (ii) setting up a parameters of sustainable production in local
ecological and market conditions; (iii) moulding of new production strategies
for direct access of farmers into the market; (iv) development and
implementation of pilot-projects with participation of farmers for modern
sustainable sheep and goat production.
-------------------------------------
INTRODUCTION
Table 1. The number of sheep and goats
Year |
Number of sheep |
Number of ewes |
Number of goats |
Number of does |
1990 |
8 130 000 |
5 006 000 |
432 923 |
366 559 |
1995 |
3 397 610 |
2 357 000 |
795 436 |
655 611 |
1996 |
3 383 034 |
2 386 451 |
833 325 |
668 250 |
1997 |
3 019 600 |
1 999 693 |
848 742 |
619 168 |
Actually, the reduction of the sheep population
is on account of the former co-operative sector. Before 1990, the dominant
part of the sheep population were Merino and Semi-merino breeds. When large
co-operative farms were disrupted after 1991-1992, the private sector could
not accept these breeds because they were not profitable.
Nowadays, the high interest in goat farming
is due to the low standard of the rural and mountain population. Many people
keep goats to satisfy their own needs of milk, milk products and meat. In
comparison with cattle, goat keeping is easier. They are not demanding regarding
the forages and they require less expense.
The number of sheep and goat farms
In the beginning of 1995, the number of sheep in the private sector was 92.3percent, kept on 486 627 farms (6.4 sheep per farm). Total number of goats was 99.9 percent, kept on 373 900 farms (2.12 goats per farm) - the information is from the National Institute of Statistics - 1995. Under these conditions, the term "farms" is not very proper. "Individual farmers" is a more accurate expression.
The farm structure
The small size of the herds is a typical characteristic of today's sheep farming. A lot of people keep sheep to satisfy their family needs of milk and meat. There is a limited percentage of farmers who keep large herds over 100 ewes (Table 2).
Type of production
Flock size and production technology for most
of the farmers determine an extensive production system. With regard to milk
yield per ewe in lowlands, where Pleven Black-head, Stara Zagora and Maritza
sheep are kept, there is a semi-intensive production system.
Table 2. Flock sizes of sheep farms of Bulgaria
(private sector)
Number of sheep |
Number of farms |
Structure (percent) |
|
428 789 |
88.12 |
|
43 236 |
8.88 |
|
12 231 |
2.51 |
|
1 831 |
0.38 |
|
540 |
0.11 |
| Total number of farms | 486 627 |
100.00 |
(Source: Lazarova 1995)
The main products and their importance
Figure 1. Structure of the income for 1997 in the herds of Maritza sheep
Market and relative importance of the markets from the economical point of view
Table 3. Household consumption of foods from small ruminants in Bulgaria (per capita)
| Products | 1994 |
1995 |
| Meat | ||
| Lamb and kids, kg | 2.4 |
2.2 |
| Mutton and goat, kg | 1.4 |
1.3 |
| White cheese*, kg | 10.0 |
9.2 |
| Yellow cheese,* kg | 1.6 |
1.5 |
Table 4. Exported ratio of some products of small ruminants
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
|||||||
| Export | Total export |
(%)** |
Total export | (%)** |
Total export | (%)** | |||
| Live animals (x 1000) (n) | 944.5 |
499.9 |
748.28 |
||||||
| Carcass, (t) | 4 151.0 |
7.30 |
1 732.0 |
3.40 |
|||||
| Cheese *, (t) | 15 200.0 |
25.37 |
6 300.0 |
11.90 |
5 700.00 |
13.93 |
|||
* cow, sheep and goat cheese - total; ** percent from total production
Main export markets and prices of products
It was until recent years that Bulgaria exported
small ruminant products (lamb, mutton, cheese) to Arabian countries - Syria,
Jordan, Saudi Arabia. Nowadays, the exports to these countries is being
restricted.
In 1995, the export of live animals (499 934
small ruminants) was mainly oriented to Greece (57.2 percent), Syria (31.7
percent) and Italy (8.5 percent). Carcass export chiefly concerns Greece
(52.9 percent), Italy (18.2 percent), Jordan (6.3 percent), etc. Average
export price per kilogram was: live body weight US$1.58; carcass US$4.39.
During 1995, total export of cheese (white and
yellow) amounted to 6 300 tonnes, but in 1996 it decreased to 5 700
tonnes. During the last years total export of cheese showed a constant trend
of decreasing (67 percent in comparison with 1990) which is a result of reduction
of dairy animals (cow, ewe and goat). White and yellow Bulgarian cheeses
are sold all over the world. The exports of 1995 are distributed throughout
European countries, the United States of America, Australia and Arabian
countries.
Selling products from farms
Table 5. Selling products from the farms
Year |
Ewe Milk (t) |
Goat Milk
(t) |
Wool (t) |
Meat *
|
1990 |
262 000 |
62 100 |
27 800 |
168 925 |
1995 |
119 587 |
142 700 |
8 790 |
115 818 |
1996 |
110 308 |
139 000 |
9 193 |
127 220 |
Export forms of products
Traditionally, main forms of small ruminant
export are: live animals, carcasses and cheese (white and yellow). The skins
(raw and leathers) are not a significant part of the total export from small
ruminants. The clothing and fur industries are not very proper parameter
for small ruminant products, since responsible companies preferably use imported
materials. During the last years in the country, the regular import of wool
has been from Russia.
Breeds (and their names) bred in Bulgaria
Sheep Breeds
In the mountains, Tzigai, Karakachaska and other local sheep are dominant breeds. Some rare breeds still exist in the hill area of the country - Local Karnobat breed, Coopery-red Shumenska.
Goat Breeds
The predominant part of goat population are
local goats, well adapted to local geographic and husbandry conditions.
Genetically they are heterogeneous groups with different fur- color. Milk
yield varies from 250 to 400 litres.
It is wise to breed Bulgarian White Milky (BWM),
which successfully combines the high productive traits of Saanen goat and
fitness characteristics of local goats. Milk yield is about 375 litres per
210 days (Terziyska et al.,1994). High interest exists in the Saanen goat,
Togenburg, Anglonubian and their crosses, but their numbers are not significant.
The status of property
Table 7. Status of property on the sheep and goat populations of Bulgaria (01.01.1997)
| Status of property | n |
percent |
Sheep |
||
| Private | 2 986 314 | 98.89 |
| Co-operative + State | 33 286 | 1.11 |
| Total | 3 019 600 | 100.00 |
Goats |
||
| Private | 848 292 | 99.95 |
| Co-operative +State | 450 | 0.05 |
| Total | 848 742 | 100.00 |
Table 8. Status of property of arable and pasture lands in Bulgaria
Thousands hectares |
State and
communal
percent |
Agricultural co-operatives percent |
Private
|
|
| Arable lands | 6 164 |
21.1 |
35.5 |
43.4 |
| Cultivated lands | 4 693 |
5.7 |
42.4 |
51.9 |
| Pastures | 1 470 |
70.1 |
13.6 |
16.3 |
Lands and Barns
Farm labour
In the lowlands, the following situations can
be observed:
· Shepherds keep their own herds, but sometimes
they use the family to help. This system is dominant in the herds of Local
Maritza sheep, Pleven Blackhead, and Stara Zagora;
· During the grazing period, some farmers
practise different forms of co-operation, collecting their herds on the communal
pastures. During the night, herds usually come back to the barn of the owner.
The farmers take turns to look after the sheep during the week;
· In winter, sheep are kept in the barn
by the farmer. During the grazing period the farmer employs herdsman.
In the mountains, farmers use
only family labour during the winter. During the grazing period
some farmers collect their own herds and lead them to communal mountain pastures
for a long period. Some of them take herdsmen; occasionally, others take
them in turns to look after the herds.
Based on the current production system, thoroughly
changed in the last seven years, we are not supplied with any scientific
research or detailed description of labour organization at the farm level.
The lambing system
Usually farmers practice only one lambing per year. A second lambing during the same year can be found accidentally. In the lowlands, the lambing season starts in the middle of December and continues into the middle of March, while in the mountains February to March is the typical lambing season.
The origin of feeds used on the farms
During the grazing period all herds feed on communal pastures. In the lowlands the grazing period comprises 7-8 months, while in the mountains it is restricted to 5-6 months. Farmers use different methods of supplying feed for the winter period. Depending on the size of the owned lands, three possible systems can be found: self produced, purchased or mixed.
The presence of necessary equipment and machinery on the farms
Lots of work on sheep and goat farms is done
by hand. The most labour-consuming process in sheep farming, for example
milking, is done manually nowadays. Although machine milking was widely practiced
in Bulgaria (mainly on former co-operative farms), at present machine milking
of sheep is saved as a technology used only in the Research Institute of
Cattle and Sheep Breeding in Stara Zagora. Some local dairy sheep breeds
in the private sector are suitable for machine milking, but small size of
flocks and the high price of milking parlours is a great obstacle for
implementation of machine milking in sheep farming. One of the more specific
processes in sheep farming - shearing, can be easily mechanized, because
the clippers are accessible in the market. About 20 percent of the Breeding
Association of Maritza Sheep members use clippers. Tractors and other small-scale
machines are available for transport operations.
It seems that machine milking at this moment
is more acceptable for goat farming, especially for those who keep and intend
to keep more goats per flock.
Breeding and Farmers' Organizations in Bulgaria
Before 1990, 27 government services functioned
in the animal breeding area. They served mainly the former co-operative sector.
During 1994 they were reduced to 9 centres. By recommendation of the EAAP
Task Force on Central and Eastern Europe (K. Meyn 1996) these services have
been saved. Now, they are normatively authorized to continue livestock
improvement programmes of the government.
During 1990, the first non-government breeding
organization was established - the Breeding Association of Maritza sheep.
This is a small organization of forty members. The main task of this association
is to preserve Maritza sheep as a valuable genetic resource. In the beginning
of 1993 the milk recording programme of local Maritza sheep was started with
the support of private farmers from the Plovdiv region and the national fund
for scientific researches. Since 1996 monitoring of Maritza sheep has been
supported by the Agricultural University of Plovdiv. Because of the local
distribution of Maritza sheep, the Breeding Association of Local Maritza
sheep definitely obtained regional importance and contribution to
Bulgaria.
Unfortunately, this initiative has not been
followed by the farmers who kept Pleven Blackhead and Stara Zagora breeds,
which are larger populations. Instead, by the initiative of former government
services, another structure was established - The National Union of Sheep
and Goat Farming (1994). This process was prompted by the government structures
because it was obvious that the process of grouping and confederation among
shepherds and goatherds had been delayed. The expectations are that this
union will be able to support farmers. Now this National Union has to prove
its successful existence.
The Council of sheep and goat farming was created
in 1995. This counsel consists of well-known scientists who have to prepare
a national programme for sheep and goat farming restoration.
Extension services for the farmers
At the end of 1995 the Ministry of Agriculture,
Forestry and Agrarian Reform (MAFAR) started a project for building the National
Agricultural Advisory System (NAAS), with co-operation of the Agricultural
Academy and financial support from the programme PHARE. This is the governmental
policy to establish adequate structures into the field of agriculture in
Bulgaria. NAAS can be considered a prototype of "Extension Services" system.
Lots of farmers directly contact a scientists
and specialists from agricultural universities and research institutes, where
they can be advised and helped.
Aids and governmental supports available for the farmers
The main problems which have to be solved for the new farmers
The basic weakness of sheep and goat husbandry in Bulgaria is the lack of integral connection between farmers, and the processing and marketing of sheep and goat products. In Bulgaria there doesn't exist a good example, like the Awassi Corporation in Hungary (Kiss et al., 1997), that can be followed by the other farmers. A great contribution in the rebuilding of the sheep industry could be done by those who can integrate these three parts of the production chain: production - processing - marketing.
Alternative utilization of small ruminants in the country
Lately, more attention has been given to ecological aspects in animal husbandry. The society set up requirements for ecologically clean production. Some projects for building demonstrative ecological farms of sustainable agriculture have been started. On these farms, agricultural animals were included as an important element of the whole agro-ecological production chain. For example, at the Agricultural University of Plovdiv, a mixed ecological farm was established as an Agro-ecological centre. A sheep farm there was built with a small herd of 40 sheep.
What kind of economical situation could be seen regarding different sizes of farms?
The farms with 21 to 50 and 51 to 100 sheep per flock can be the basis of farmers' organizations and future breeding work.
Availability of governmental programmes to save and rebuild the sheep and goat industry
During forthcoming years, the economy of the
country will work under conditions of a "Currency board", which started on
1 July 1997. Strong reductions of the governmental budget are expected. The
government will not be able to support farmers financially and directly.
State funded "Agriculture" is available for
the farmers to draw credits, but until now there has been a low interest
to draw credits.
The purpose of the new government is to create
favourable conditions for production without active intervention in the
production sector. In this situation the farmers' initiative is of great
importance for successful development of sheep and goat farming. The presence
of effective farmers' and breeding organizations is a key factor to achieve
sustainability of the sheep and goat industry.
Conclusions
The present production system is very difficult
to manage. Reasons:
· Existing farmers' and breeding organizations
are new organizations with insufficient experience and resources to protect
economical interests of the new farmers.
· Lack of well-trained people for effective
management of sheep and goat production.
For successful management, it is necessary for
farmers to have access to the final markets of sheep and goat farming. This
could be achieved if:
· Farmers have their own cheese factories
to process ran materials and sell the final products on the market.
· The farmers are on a contractual basis
with processors and dealers in order to access the market.
At present the possible means to improve production
systems are:
· A careful study of present production
systems.
· Setting up parameters of sustainable
production in local ecological and market conditions.
· Moulding new production strategies for
direct access of farmers into the market.
· Development and implementation of
pilot-projects, with participation of farmers, for modern sustainable sheep
and goat production.
REFERENCES
Bulletin of the Ministry of Agriculture and
Food industry 1996. Analysis of situation and tendencies in Animal production
sector.
Kiss, B.- Kovács, P. - Székelyhidi,
T. & Kukovics, S. 1997. Breeding aims to develop sheep milk production.
In: Proceedings of the meeting of the FAO-CIHEAM Network of Co-operative
Research on Sheep and Goats, Toulouse, 9-11 March.
Lazarova, M. 1995. Structural problems
of the Animal Production. "Which way in Animal Production sector". In:
Proceedings of the Scientific conference, October 18.
Meyn, K. 1996. EAAP task force on Eastern
Europe. Livestock Production Science, In: EAAP News 46: 143-145.
Mikhailov, M. 1995. Structural problems
of the Animal Production. "Which way in Animal Production sector" In:
Proceedings of the Scientific conference, October 18.
Mikhailova, R. 1997. Ministry of Agriculture,
Forestry and Agrarian Reform. Personal communication
(21-00-842/29.07.97).
National Institute of Statistics 1995.
Agricultural animals to 1st January, 1995. Sofia. In:
Statistical yearbook of Bulgaria. 1996.
Statistical Book of Reference 1997.
Tersiyska, M. - Popov, Zh. - Petrova, N.
& Dochevski, D. 1994. Milk productivity and composition of milk of
two breeds - Bulgarian White Milky (BWM) and Saanisated crosses, In:
Journal of Animal Science 134-135.
BREEDING AND PRODUCTION
OF SMALL RUMINANTS
IN THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA
Mikulec, Kre_imir
Veterynary Faculty University of
Zagreb
Department for Animal Breeding and
Technology
Croatia
---------------------------------------------
ABSTRACT
Concerning goats, there are about 950 breeders, have herds of 50-70 heads, i.e. about 83 percent of breeders, and the rest have herds of 1-50 heads and more than 70 heads, i.e. about 13 percent.
---------------------------------------------
State of sheep and goat production
Figure
1. Total number of sheep and goats in period 1970-1995 in the Republic of
Croatia
The largest number of goats was on the territory
of Dalmatian Zagora (Benkovac, Obrovac, Knin, Sinj), then in a smaller amount
along the coast and on the islands of the Adriatic Sea (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Distribution of sheep and goats
Figure 3. Percentage of sheep and goat breeders
according to the number of animals in flock
Grassland - the basis of sheep and goat-breeding
Table 1. Acrage of grassland and its productivity
REPUBLIC OF CROATIA
TOTAL ACREAGE
5 650 000 ha
TOTAL AGRICULTURAL ACREAGE 3 224 000 ha
100 %
GRASSLAND (MEADOWS AND PASTURES) 1 565 000 ha
MEADOWS 410 000 ha
PASTURES 1 155 000 ha
26.2%
984 000 tonnes of hay
574 400 tonnes of hay
1 558 000 tonnes of hay
104 000 tonnes of meat
Breeds and production of small ruminants
Table 2. Total quantity of mutton and the share of lamb meat in the period from 1991 to 1994
Year |
Total amount of mutton (tonnes) |
Share of lamb meat (tonnes) |
Share of lamb meat (%) |
1991 |
5 062 |
2 746 |
54.25 |
1992 |
3 816 |
2 418 |
63.36 |
1993 |
3 320 |
2 042 |
61.51 |
1994 |
3 201 |
1 995 |
62.32 |
Moreover, the milk production was about 5120 million litres (Figure 4).
Figure 4. Production of sheep milk for the
period 1975-1994 in the Republic of Croatia
Figure 5. Production of wool in the period
from 1965 to 1994 in the Republic of Croatia
Table 3. Production of milk of the controlled cultivated breeds of goats in 1994
Breed |
Number of goats |
Lactation in days |
Milk quantity kg |
percent of milk fat |
| Saanen | 612 |
256 |
508 |
3.55 |
| Alpine and Bunte Deutsche Edelziege | 3 651 |
261 |
505 |
3.48 |
Today there is a great interest for the breedings of good quality as well as for a melioration of goats to increase the production as well as economic effects of small family husbandries. The past production of kid's meat and dairy products was not officially registered, so it is used for the needs of population and domestic market respectively.
Nutrition and reproduction of small ruminants
Stimulating measures for intensifying the production of small ruminants
a) National advisory service financed from the
funds of the budget of the Republic and organized in all the districts with
192 highly qualified agricultural experts in total. The basic task of the
service is advisory assistance and education of breeders with the aim of
improving agricultural and cattle breeding production of private family
husbandries in Croatia.
b) Granting credits, which is carrying out through
the Ministry of Agriculture of Croatia giving very favourable credits up
to five years. The interest is up to 6 percent with two years of grace
period.
c) Associations of private breeders are organized
according to the branches of activities with legal persons representing the
interests of breeders towards the Republic.
d) Selection of progeny breeding (calves, heifers,
tags and kids of both sexes) through the organized selection service of Croatia,
which at the same time introduces production and parent records for small
ruminants and others. The award per tag and kid bred is achieved irretrievably
in the amount of 350-500 KN and it is to be used for reconstruction of one's
own herd and other breeders buying the progeny for expanding and reconstruction
of the herd, respectively.
e) The organized selection service has about
163 highly skilled professionals and control assistants carrying out the
introduction of production and parent records in the field, and at the same
time they participate in accepting and organizing the realization of the
credits for private family husbandries all along Croatia.
FAO has also been included in the work of the
Ministry with its advisory work on organizing agricultural and cattle breeding
production, and by giving financial means for educating the experts for the
needs of improving the private family husbandries all along Croatia.
Due to all the mentioned actions carried out
by the Ministry of Agriculture in the last two years, the interest of the
breeders for improving and intensifying the production has rapidly increased
as well as at private family husbandries of the breeders of small ruminants.
MAJOR NATIONAL AND
INTERNATIONAL TRENDS IN
SHEEP-BREEDING
Abayné-Hamar, Enik
College of Agriculture
Gödöll University of
Agricultural Sciences
Gyöngyös, Hungary
---------------------------------------------
ABSTRACT
Sheep breeding gives an export output worth
US60 million on areas featuring poor characteristics for other agricultural
activities.
The EU can fulfil 80 percent of its demand from
its own sources, so sheep products will be saleable in the future, too.
Favourable market and breeding conditions in Hungary would justify an increase
in sheep stock, but in spite of this a continuous decrease is recorded.
If one studies statistical data of sheep breeding
he/she can see that there has been a considerable increase in the number
of private sheep breeding farms. Unfortunately these do not perform serious
breeding activities, their technology is mostly outdated and there has been
no development in foraging or organization of work.
Lands that can only be used as grasslands must
be used for sheep breeding and for this a sound financial support system
is to be established. Sheep breeding based on grassland management with low
investment costs is competitive as compared to other animal husbandry activities.
Among well-balanced production conditions the output per unit of fixed and
current assets is also favourable. Sheep breeding may be competitive compared
to crop production units, too if we consider the fact that sheep breeding
gives marketable products on lands representing low value for crop
production.
Usually private farms do not deal only with
sheep breeding. Their stocks are low (50-300 ewes) which results in a fairly
low yearly income (HUF 2000-3000/year/ewe).
Small farms make full use of individual and
special possibilities not always available for large companies (eg. selling
side products, using harvested corn fields). Some of the large sheep breeding
companies are successful; in most of the cases they are those which do the
distribution for themselves.
As far as the mutton production in the world
is concerned China's production level has increased considerably while a
slight decrease has been registered in various areas of Oceania. The same
agro-economic indicator dropped sharply in eastern Europe and the states
of the former Soviet Union. In the EU this has hardly changed.
The drop in eastern Europe and the former Soviet
Union was caused by political changes. Stocks in Australia and New-Zealand
decreased as a result of the price crash in 1990 and drought in the early
1990s. We can not expect boosting sales since the level of trade is affected
by the regeneration of stocks.
The wholesale purchasing price of the mutton
has registered a positive development compared to other species. In the case
of slaughter sheep, mutton represents 90 percent of the income, wool and
milk bring very little.
If is unfortunate, however, that milk and cheese
distribution has dropped since much higher export outputs could be achieved
if farmers took the time to milk the ewes. Merino is not appropriate for
milk production but there are brilliant breeds that could form good stocks
for specialized farms.
I follow the changes in sheep breeding closely,
analyse the data and calculate trends for prices and production. Hopefully,
as a result I will be able to give viable solutions to the actual problems
of Hungarian sheep breeding.
---------------------------------------------
The changes in the sheep industry
Sheep-breeding in Hungary gives an annual export
output of US60 million on areas that are otherwise not appropriate for other
profitable agricultural activities while needing very low investment.
A high percentage of the products are exported
to the EU, mostly to Italy.
The self distribution potential of the EU as
far as sheep products are concerned is around 80 percent, thus there will
continuously be a demand to be met. These favourable market conditions should
result in an increase in sheep stock, but despite all this the stocks are
decreasing.
Analysing the dynamics of sheep stocks, one
can see a sharp rise in the number of private farms. Unfortunately we cannot
talk about serious breeding activity on these farms. The technology is outdated
and there has been no change in work organization either.
According to Jávor et al. (1997) in September
1996, 6 799 persons and legal persons owned ewes. Private individual
farmers owned 78.8 percent and 21.2 percent belonged to different sheep-breeding
companies (Ltds, deposit companies).
Private farmers in a typical situation perform
other activities besides sheep-breeding. They usually own relatively few
ewes (50-300), and sell mostly lamb reaching moderate income levels (HUF
2 000-3 000/year/ewe).
The 1996 distribution of ewes based on ownership
and stocks is presented in Figures 1 and 2.
Figure
1. Distribution of ewes according to the flock size in % (1996)
Figure
2. Distribution of ewes according to their ownership 1996 (Total 811 263
heads)
Private farms can make full use of specific local conditions, i.e. grazing on harvested corn fields, free grasslands, etc. (Marselek, 1993). Sheep-breeding is profitable in larger companies too, mostly where processing and distribution are done in-company.
Prices and economy
Lands that can only be used as grasslands must
be used for sheep breeding and for this a sound financial support system
is to be established. Sheep breeding based on grassland management with low
investment costs is competitive as compared to other animal husbandry activities.
Among well-balanced production conditions the output per unit of fixed and
current assets is also favourable. Sheep breeding may be competitive compared
to crop production units, too if we consider the fact that sheep breeding
gives marketable products on lands representing low value for crop
production.
The wholesale purchasing price of the mutton
has registered a positive development compared to other species (Figure 3).
In the case of slaughter sheep mutton represents 90 percent of the income;
wool and milk bring very little.
Figure
3. Wholesale prices
Table 1. Export balance 1990-1995 (tonnes)
| Export value | US$ 78 million |
US$ 59 million |
| Export mutton-sheep | 27 400 |
19 200 |
| Export mutton with bones | 1 670 |
331 |
| Export sheep cheese | 782 |
266 |
| Export raw wool | 5 504 |
Source: Kukovics et al. (1997)
The numbers show a decrease in production levels
together with a decrease in stocks. In 1996, 909 658 lambs were exported
with an average weight of 20.78 kg. The amount of mutton with bones exported
was 417 355 kg. Raw wool production decreased to 2 396 tonnes.
There was a sheep milk production of 1.2 million litres.
Export prices showed an increasing trend in
May.
Table 2. Export lamb prices 1995-1997
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
||||
| Milk lamb 13-16 kg | 362 |
366 |
509 |
514 |
601 |
550 |
| Milk lamb 16-20 kg | 351 |
353 |
482 |
492 |
600 |
518 |
| Separated lamb 20-24 kg | 317 |
320 |
439 |
453 |
529 |
477 |
| Ewe lamb 24-27 kg | 288 |
288 |
386 |
409 |
479 |
415 |
| Ewe lamb 27-30 kg | 261 |
260 |
335 |
365 |
463 |
379 |
| Ewe lamb 30-35 kg | 248 |
245 |
313 |
303 |
379 |
336 |
| Ram lamb 24-27 kg | 286 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
428 |
| Ram lamb 27-30 kg | 283 |
278 |
377 |
396 |
452 |
414 |
| Ram lamb 30-35 kg | 262 |
256 |
344 |
369 |
438 |
370 |
| Ram lamb 35-40 kg | 245 |
265 |
323 |
330 |
402 |
333 |
Source: Jávor (1997)
The Hungarian lamb export represents a two percent market share in western Europe. Further decrease would jeopardize our negotiation position. Only 14.8 percent of our production stocks are on "R" level in the EUROP quality control system (Table 4). This is a poor result compared to other countries.
Table 4. Percentage per country according to the EUROP system
Country |
Category |
E |
U |
R |
O |
P |
| The Netherlands | Texel 17-17 kg | - |
43 |
54 |
3 |
- |
| Texel 21-24 kg | 2 |
57 |
39 |
2 |
- |
|
| Texel 26-28 kg | 3 |
47 |
47 |
3 |
- |
|
| Great Britain | Suffolk x Mule lambs 18.5 kg | 3 |
33 |
43 |
22 |
- |
| Oxford x Mule lambs 18.5 kg | - |
17 |
53 |
30 |
- |
|
| Hungary | Suffolk 16 kg | - |
- |
44.4 |
55.6 |
- |
| Ile de France 14.7 kg | - |
60 |
40 |
- |
- |
|
| German Mutton Merino 14.3 kg | - |
50 |
40 |
10 |
- |
|
| Comb Merino 14.1 kg | - |
- |
80 |
20 |
- |
|
| Bábolna Tetra 16.1 kg | - |
10 |
90 |
- |
- |
|
| Fertile Merino 13.2 kg | - |
- |
100 |
- |
- |
|
| Production stocks 13.7 kg | - |
- |
14.8 |
69.0 |
16.2 |
Source: Molnár, Jávor (1997)
It is unfortunate, however, that milk and cheese
distribution have dropped since much higher export outputs could be achieved
if farmers took the time to milk the ewes. Merino is not appropriate for
milk production but there are brilliant breeds that could form good stocks
for specialized farms.
A set of data related to collecting sheep milk
and sheep cheese production is presented in Table 5.
Table 5. The dynamics of collecting sheep milk, sheep cheese production and
whole-sale price
Year |
Collected milk
|
Whole-sale price
|
Produced
|
1960 |
4.8 |
- |
729 |
1970 |
22.9 |
- |
2120 |
1980 |
4.4 |
18.31* |
518 |
1990 |
3.9 |
32.50 |
775 |
1996 |
1.2 |
64.80 |
400** |
*: 1981 **: estimated data Source: own collection
As far as the mutton production in the world
is concerned, China's production level has increased considerably while a
slight decrease has been registered in various areas of Oceania. The same
agro-economic indicator dropped sharply in Eastern Europe and the states
of the former Soviet Union. In the EU this has hardly changed.
The drop in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet
Union was caused by political changes. Stocks in Australia and New Zealand
decreased as a result of the price crash in 1990 and drought in the early
1990s. We cannot expect boosting sales since the level of trade is affected
by the regeneration of stocks.
Figure 4. The dynamics of mutton production
in the world (1990-1996)
The raw wool production shows a slight decrease
worldwide. There is a sharp rise in China; however, in Australia and New
Zealand statistical data show a certain level of decrease. These three countries
give almost half of the world's wool production.
Based on the data presented one can conclude
that ewe stocks in Hungary should be increased by 20-40 percent. The EU quota
regulations would also justify such a measure since we should not join the
EU with ewe stocks lower than our real potential.
Increasing stocks is essential, thus an appropriate
financial support system is to be established, which would motivate breeders
to boost their stocks.
REFERENCES
Molnár, Gy. & Jávor, A.
1997. Tények a juhtenyésztés versenyhelyzetének
megítéléséhez. In: Magyar Juhászat
[Hungarian Sheep Breeding]. 1997. Vol. 9: 4-5.
Jávor, A. - Békési,
Gy. - Kukovics, S. - Molnár, Gy. & Koleszár, Gy. 1997.
A hazai juhállomány jellemz adatai. In: Magyar
Juhászat [Hungarian Sheep Breeding]. Vol. 2: 4.
Jávor, A. 1997.
Mélyrepülés, vagy válság? In: Magyar
Juhászat [Hungarian Sheep Breeding]. 1997. Vol. 6: 1-3.
Kukovics, S. - Jávor, A. &
Székelyhidi, T. 1997. A juhágazat fejlesztési programja
[The development programme of the sheep branch]. In: Magyar Juhászat
[Hungarian Sheep Breeding]. 1997. Vol. 3: 1-7.
Marselek, S. 1993. Juhászati
ágazat gazdaságossági tényezinek vizsgálata.
In: Kandidátusi értekezés. p. 120.
GOAT BREEDING IN THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC
Gyarmathy, Egon
Dubravska, Jarmila
Slovak Agricultural University
Department of Animal Husbandry
Nitra, Slovak Republic
---------------------------------------------
ABSTRACT
There are two milk breeds of goats (white
short-haired and brown short-haired) and two hair breeds (mohair goats and
cashmere goats). As in the past, the goats can have horns. The white short-haired
goat breed is descended from the Saanen goat.
Two new breeds were imported in 1991 from Denmark
and New Zealand. They were mohair goats and cashmere goats. Our country had
a five-year market contract with Denmark to puchase our hair production,
because we were not able to make products from hair; we had no technology
to separate cashmere. Unfortunately the contract was canceled and problems
with breeding started. The mohair production was used to produce mohair wool
of high quality, but we had only 200 mohair goats (for a big factory it was
not economical to produce only 1 000 kg of mohair). At this time we
have only a small herd of mohair goats on one state farm and these animals
are too old for production of high quality mohair. The cashmere goats were
bred also in the state farms but due to problems with cashmere production
they were leased to private farmers who used them only for grazing. We can
say that these two breeds were bred for six years but it is possible that
they will disappear from the Slovak Republic. During these six years, animals
of these breeds were evaluated through their hair production (Slovak Agricultural
University, Research station for breeding sheep and goats).
SOME TECHNOLOGICAL QUESTIONS AND RESULTS OF SHEEP PROPAGATION
Tóth, István
College Faculty
Gödöll University of
Agricultural Sciences
Meztúr, Hungary
---------------------------------------------
ABSTRACT
---------------------------------------------
INTRODUCTION
There are many factors which influence the
profitability of sheep breeding, like the features of reproduction-biology,
the facilities of keeping and forage and the conditions of the sales. Utilization
of the possibilities - which can be external and internal, too - underlies
the increase of the profitability in the sheep-branch. The existence or the
lack of the possibilities influences the complement of the stock, the volume
of the production, the orientation of the utilization, as well as the standard
of the breeding and keeping (Illés, 1995; Lengyel, 1995;
Daróczi-Kukovics, 1995).
Due to the attrition of the sheep, the senescence
of the ewes and in direct ratio to this the decrease of the genetic value,
we could not utilize our export possibilities in mutton during the last 7-8
years. We can attribute the reasons for these in the first place to the decrease
of the living lamb-crop (80-90 living lambs/100 ewes) and to the loss during
upbringing (18-22%), and in the second place to the multiple increase of
the forage costs and the extra low salesprice of the wool.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The basic aim of the examination was to find
an answer for the question: How one can increase the lamb crop using applied
breeding technologycal methods and decrease loss of the born-lambs by using
high quality forage and applying better lambing technology.
The most important factor impeding the increase
of the lamb-crop (Becze, 1981) is that the Merino, which breed is the most
common in our country, is mono-oestrus by nature, so it lambs 2-3 times a
year.
The main season of the oestrus - due to our
geographical location - is the early autumn; after the 150-152 days of pregnancy
the birth is in the end of winter or early spring. The characteristic short-term
pregnancy and fast growth of the lamb-crop could permit refertilization within
a relatively short time.
The biggest problem of refertilization is that
the early spring is a rest term for the sheep - there is no oestrus and
ovulation. So, in the first place the profitability of the branch revolves
around the volume of the products (mutton, milk, wool), the input of the
branch and the ruling price of the products. Recently this problem could
be solved by the increase of the reproductive ability and by the decrease
of the loss during upbringing, but one must not neglect the cost of the
production. The application of reproductive-technical methods is conducive
to an increase of the lamb-crop (Becze, 1977), because multiple births depend
less on the number of the conceptions than on the ability of the pregnancy
with more embryos; after all, the base of the twinning-birth is multiple
ovulation which occurs regularly in sheep. If, however, all the ovulated
eggs can impregnate the mother depends on the physical condition of the ewe.
Therefore, fitting conditions must be created for the ewes which facilitates
impregnation and gestation before polyovulation occurs.
This problem does not occur with ewes rutted
in the main season, because in this time the mothers body has enough time
to prepare for the gestation.
RESULTS
The increase in reproduction and the expansion
of production and products could not be safely projected based only on the
traditional rutting season. One should strive for the utmost utilization
of the possibilities derived from the biological capabilities of sheep. One
of the possibilities is gestation out of the traditional rutting season,
in which case several methods are known.
I carried out my examination in 1975-1979 at
a producers' co-operative with 4 500 ewes. The data are old, but I hope
the results of the method used in my examination will be adaptable in the
future again.
I experimented with several methods to precipitate
oestrus out of season:
I got clean-cut results with just one of the above-mentioned methods, the oestrus-synchronization ("e" method). The results of the methods are contained in Table 1.
Table 1/a. The methods and results of the applied precipitation of the oestrus
Ewes |
Sending |
Ruttish ewe |
Ewe in lamb |
Lambed |
Empty ewe |
||||||||
Method |
stock |
for (day) |
stock |
% |
stock |
% |
stock |
% |
stock |
% |
|||
| Biostimulation | 450 |
40 |
247 |
55.0 |
223 |
49.5 |
220 |
48.8 |
230 |
51.1 |
|||
| Foddershock | 275 |
70 |
212 |
77.0 |
201 |
73.0 |
195 |
70.9 |
80 |
29.0 |
|||
| Fodder | 327 |
35 |
59 |
18.0 |
55 |
16.8 |
54 |
16.5 |
273 |
83.4 |
|||
| Pheromone-effect | 923 |
45 |
174 |
18.8 |
160 |
17.3 |
152 |
16.4 |
771 |
83.5 |
|||
| Hormone-product | 10 064 |
- |
10 064 |
100.0 |
9 115 |
90.6 |
8 141 |
80.9 |
1 923 |
19.1 |
|||
Table 1/b. The results of the applied precipitation of the oestrus
Ewes |
Sending |
Ruttish ewe |
Ewe in lamb |
Lambed |
Empty ewe |
|||||||||
Method |
stock |
for (day) |
stock |
% |
Stock |
% |
stock |
% |
stock |
% |
||||
| Buck and he-goats without stimulation | 350 |
40 |
75 |
21.4 |
70 |
20.0 |
68 |
19.4 |
282 |
80.6 |
||||
| Foddershock | 331 |
70 |
31 |
9.3 |
26 |
7.8 |
24 |
7.2 |
307 |
92.5 |
||||
| Normal fodder | 327 |
35 |
8 |
2.4 |
8 |
2.4 |
8 |
2.4 |
319 |
97.5 |
||||
| Pheromone-effect | 350 |
45 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||||
| Hormone-product | - |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||||
Table 2. contains the conformation of the lamb-crop. I attach it to show its importance.
Table 2. The conformation of the lamb-crop
Year |
Average ewe-number |
Baby-lamb |
After an unforced oestrus |
After an oestrus-synchroni-zation |
Addition of the oestrus-synch. % |
Crop / 100 ewes |
Crop 1975=100% |
Number of ewes 1975= 100% |
1975 |
3 453 |
3 165 |
3 165 |
- |
- |
91.65 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
1976 |
3 564 |
5 277 |
3 525 |
1 752 |
33.2 |
148.06 |
131.5 |
103.2 |
1977 |
4 475 |
5 006 |
3 420 |
1 586 |
31.6 |
111.86 |
122.0 |
129.6 |
1978 |
4 526 |
6 203 |
4 418 |
1 786 |
28.7 |
137.05 |
149.5 |
131.1 |
1979 |
4 509 |
7 145 |
2 632 |
4 513 |
63.1 |
158.46 |
172.8 |
130.6 |
Total |
26 796 |
17 159 |
9 637 |
35.9 |
- |
- |
- |
|
The results of the oestrus synchronization are shown in the data of Table 3.
Table 3. The number of oestrus-synchronized ewes, and the results of the method
1976 |
1977 |
1978 |
1979 |
Total |
||
| Ewe | ||||||
| -handled, piece | 1 990 |
1 490 |
1 610 |
4 974 |
10 064 |
|
| -fertilized, piece | 1 990 |
1 490 |
1 610 |
4 974 |
10 064 |
|
| -die off, emergency slaughter, piece | 80 |
30 |
26 |
92 |
228 |
|
| Aborts | ||||||
| -ewe, piece | 57 |
40 |
29 |
280 |
406 |
|
| -lamb, piece | 64 |
49 |
27 |
310 |
461 |
|
| Still-birth | ||||||
| -ewe, piece | 84 |
48 |
50 |
288 |
470 |
|
| -lamb, piece | 96 |
60 |
69 |
300 |
525 |
|
| Fallen ewe, piece | 1 504 |
1 342 |
1 397 |
3 868 |
8 141 |
|
| Born lamb, piece | 1 752 |
1 586 |
1 786 |
4 513 |
9 637 |
|
| Ewe with twinling, piece | 210 |
105 |
331 |
645 |
1 291 |
|
| Gestationed ewe, piece | 1 685 |
1 459 |
1 489 |
4 482 |
9 115 |
|
| Gestation % | 85.0 |
92.48 |
91.08 |
90.10 |
90.72 |
|
Living lamb-crop / 100 tupped ewes: 97.75
pieces
Living lamb-crop / 100 lambed ewes: 118.37
pieces
Total lamb-crop / 100 tupped ewes: 105.55
pieces
Total lamb-crop / 100 lambed ewes: 125.86
pieces
Twinning % / lambed ewes: 15.85 %
Twinning % / tupped ewes: 12.82 %
Progesterone is the active substance of the
product used to evoke artificial oestrus. The progesterone is embedded in
silicon-gum; this product is called SIL-ESTRUS, from the firm ABBOT.
The implant must be inserted under the skin,
among the muscle-membranes by the help of a special instrument, through a
0.5 cm wide cut. After the implantation the wound must be sewed with two
cross-diamond stitches. On the 14th day the implant must be taken away and
500 Ui units of PMSG must be injected under the skin. After 36-39 hours of
this the ewe can be fertilized. The fertilization must be repeated after
452 hours. I established in the process of my examinations during fertilization
(2 or 3 times) that the third fertilization increased the gestation by 1.1
percent, which explain the theory (Becze, 1981) that the oestrus or the ovulation
is presumably after the
60th
hour.
The adapted PMSG products are as follows: PROLAN-A,
GESTYL, CEVA, FOLIGON, GONADOTROFIL. These products gave nearly the same
results with gestation. In respect to the cost, the difference was greater
(48.1 HUF/dose and 23.8 HUF/dose) but if we reduce these for present value
they will be equalized by the inflation.
The material cost of the oestrus-synchronization
is on the average 74.8 HUF/lamb (1975-1979) which corresponded to the open-market
price of one kilogram live-weight and this material cost is in our days also
the same like the cost of one kilogram lamb weight (630-650 HUF/kg).
We can state that the incretotherapy increased the forage costs by 5-8 percent,
which is derived from the additional feeding after the fertilization and
from the preparation (raised dose provender). I examined the lamb-crop of
two flocks of sheep with additional feeding and without additional feeding.
We can state that the plus-progeny is bigger in the flock with additional
feeding by 11-14 percent because the ewes were in better condition.
Nowadays and in the past too, the main problem
of the sheep-branch is the high die-off rate of the baby lambs. This fact
can be esteemed as important because the low rate of progeny with the high
rate of die-off impacts the already low quantity of the sheep products for
export. If this tendency turns out to be long lasting, then we cannot employ
the available export quota in mutton and we should enter the EU with this
present amount of mutton.
The loss during upbringing has its origin in
many reasons. The first and perhaps the most important problem is the bad
condition and the inadequate preparation of the ewes. The other problems
are the insufficiencies of the birth-technology, the crowding, the lack of
tools and material, the losses, the carelessness and the lack of skills of
sheepherders.
If there is an adequate method for the increase
of the lamb-crop, we have to find the solution for saving the baby lambs,
too. Therefore, I felt it necessary to analyse the adopted birth-technologies,
which are appropriate for lambs born in great numbers at the same time. I
estimated with which birth-technology application (traditional birth in herd,
birth in divided herd, birth in small group, individual birth) the loss turned
to most advantageously.
The traditional birth in herd results in the
highest rate of die-off. A smaller die-off rate was at the birth in divided
herd with the allocation of the even-aged lambs (30-50 ewes with their lambs).
In both methods the desertion of the lambs increased, 5-10 percent of the
lambs lost their mother and some of these lambs recovered the required milk
for themselves by stealing, but the others died off.
The artificial upbringing, the fostering, did
not give a reassuring result. On the basis of the latest research (Csízi,
1997) the tests with nanny goats show good results.
I saw good results in the first year of my
examination (Tóth, 1982) at the beginning of the "birth in small group"
technology. From the results the lamb-technology (AGROCOOP) was defined and
with the application of this technology (10-15 ewes with their lambs) a unit
was built which could be watched easily; possibly it can regroup again and
the feed can be suited to the demand of the ewes. So the ewes and their lambs
easily find each other and the level of the die-off can be kept back to 5-10
percent.
I found as an optimum solution the individual
birth method at which each ewe and its lamb(s) are kept separately in a box
with 1.2m x 1.2m of ground-space. I feel the separate keeping until 10 days
of age of the lambs (when the voice- and smell-contact evolve between the
ewe and lamb) is necessary. After this the sheep are settled in groups (30-40
sheep). The result was: 620 ewes brought up 832 lambs and the loss was just
one lamb. The lone disadvantage of this method is the great material
cost.
CONCLUSIONS
To sum up the matter it can be stated that the
induced oestrus with incretotherapy is absolutely alike to the oestrus in
season, the ewes looked for the bucks remarkably, the "harem" evolved. The
adopted hormone-products do not influence the oestrus in season or the fertility
of the ewes. The meddling can be made without any mistake because the ewes
were handled several times. The preparation and the measure of the forage
can be determined economically on the basis of the condition of the ewes
separately in herds.
By the help of the instrumental pregnancy control
the lean ewes can be selected and they will be rearranged in other groups.
The lamb-crop can be stabilized at a high level with the oestrus-synchronization
and by its continuity the demand of the market can be satisfied. The
fertilization costs for one kilogram of mutton, which is free from the
preparation cost (additional forage) were lower than the live-weight costs
based on the open-market price. By the method of birth (lamb) in small groups
the rate of die-off decreased measurably.
REFERENCES
Daróczi, L.-Kukovics, S. 1995.
[Shortage of the ewe-milk - troubles - possibilities]. In Magyar
Juhászat [Hungarian Sheep Breeding] 10: 2-3.
Illés, B. Cs. 1995. [Examination
of the factors influenced the profitability of the sheep-branch, possibilities
of the increasing of the competition]. In: Dissertation.
Lengyel, L. 1995. The profitability situation
of sheep-milk production in Hungary. In: Cercetaaria stientifica si
tehnica in spriinul dezvoltarii si restructurarii agriculturii. Timisoara.
pp.11-18.
Becze, József 1981.
Reproduction-biology of the females. Mezgazdasági Kiadó. Budapest,
pp. 341-371.
Becze, József 1977. The bases
and possibilities of the increasing of the reproductiveness and reproduction
capacity. In: Állattenyésztés, 2:119-125.
Becze, József - Látits,
György - Mátrai, Tibor 1971. Oestrum-precipitation of the
ewes, out of season, with one-shot injection meddling. In: Magyar
Állatorvosok Lapja. Budapest. 4:211-212.
Botkin, M.P. - Lang, R.L. 1978. Influence
of severe dietary restriction the dry period on subsequent ewe productivity.
In: J. Anim. Sci. Champaign. 5:1147-1150.
Rattkay, P.U. - Jagusch, K.T. - Smith, J.F.
1978. Sheep flushing ewes on pasture and silage. In: Ruakava, F.M.R.S.
Conference, Wellington. 30:24-26.
Veress, László 1974. The
possibility of the increase of the reproductiveness in the sheep-breeding.
In: Állattenyésztés. No.3.
Csizi, István 1997. Milk-source
in the fold, catch each penny. In: Magyar Állattenyésztk
Lapja. Budapest. 9:14-15.
Tóth, István 1982.
Keeping-technology of the lamb-progeny at the state farm in Meztúr.
Dissertation. Gödöll. pp.1-111.
Tóth, István 1982.
Technical-economical examination of the technological equipment by the fall
and suggestions for the modernization. Meztúr. pp.24-78.
SITUATION OF SHEEP
AND GOAT PRODUCTION
IN SR YUGOSLAVIA
Krajinovi, M.
inkulov, Mirjana
ujovi, M.
Meki, C.
University of Belgrade,
Faculty of Agriculture
Beograd-Zenum, Yugoslavia
---------------------------------------------
ABSTRACT
---------------------------------------------
USEFUL ANCIENT SHEEP BREEDS IN THE DANUBIAN REGION
Gáspárdy,
András
Eszes, Ferenc
Bodó, Imre
University of Veterinary Science
Dept. of Animal Husbandry
Budapest, Hungary
---------------------------------------------
ABSTRACT
The DAGENE (Danubian Countries Alliance for
conservation of Genes in Animal Species) undertook the description and comparison
of different traits of the native sheep breeds of the area. The purpose of
the preservation of genetic resources is to serve the aspirations of humanity
for the unknown distant future. It seems, however, that some niches of the
market are open for some products of native sheep breeds even nowadays.
This is the reason that the goal of scientific
investigation on the characteristics of sheep breeds in the Danubian area
is
---------------------------------------------
ANCIENT BREEDS IN DANUBIAN REGION
Table 1. Measurements of Tsigai varieties
| Characteristics | Zombor type Tsigai |
Csóka type Tsigai |
| height at withers, cm | 78.3 |
65.4 |
| depth of chest, cm | 37.0 |
33.6 |
| length of body, cm | 93.0 |
71.7 |
| canon girth, cm | 8.9 |
8.1 |
Table 2. Native sheep breeds
| Country | Sheep breeds |
| Austria | Kartner Brillenschaf, Steinschaf, Waldschaf |
| Bosnia | Pramenka |
| Bulgaria | Pleven Blackhead |
| Croatia | Ruda Paska |
| Czech Republic | Sumavska, Primorska, Valachian Tzigai |
| Germany (Bavaria) | Steinschaf, Bergschaf, Waldschaf, Valachianschaf |
| Hungary | Racka, Tsigai, Cikta |
| Northern Italy | Frabosana, Sambucana |
| Romania | Valachian, Tzurkana, Racka |
| Slovakia | Valachian, Tzigai, |
| Slovenia | Bovska, Pramenka, Jazerskosolcavska |
| Switzerland | Spiegelschaf, Schwarzbraun Bergschaf, Luzeiner Fuchsfarbenes Engadienerschaf., Elbschaf, Brindner Oberlander |
| Bugacpuszta | 1989 | Zagreb-Pag | 1994 |
| Krems | 1991 | Prague | 1995 |
| Üll | 1992 | Sibiu | 1997 |
| Kosice | 1993 | Kosice | 1997 |
THE RECENT USE OF ANCIENT, LOCAL BREEDS
Table 3.: Results of milk recording 1966
| Breeds/herds | Number of ewes |
Days of lactation |
Milk yield, kg |
Milk yield per milking day, kg |
| British milk
sheep/ ÁTK Herceghalom |
39 |
118 |
94 |
0.80 |
| Tsigai/ Lédeci B., Cegléd | 119 |
79 |
66 |
0.84 |
| Lacaune/ PATE Moson-magyaróvár | 62 |
80 |
55 |
0.69 |
| Hungarian Merino/ Ács-Tiszaörs | 57 |
106 |
44 |
0.42 |
| Crossed for milking/ Délborsod Gelej | 1 546 |
128 |
90 |
0.70 |
| Crossed for milking/ PATE Mosonmagyaróvár | 123 |
88 |
66 |
0.75 |
| Crossed for milking/ Hortobágyi, Hejkeresztúr | 23 |
102 |
48 |
0.47 |
| Awassi/Bakonszeg Corp. | 532 |
87 |
70 |
0.80 |
Resource: Sheep Breeders Ass'n (1997)
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
Bodó, I. 1985. Hungarian activity
on the conservation of domestic animal genetic resources. In: AGRI
4:16-22.
Bodó, I.- Dunka, B.- Karle G. &
Gera I. 1991. The fur production of Racka sheep In: Genetic
characteristics of native domestic breeds (Univ. Vet. Sci. Edit)
2: 49-64. (In Hungarian)
Bodó, I. 1994. The Hungarian
Racka. In: AGRI 13:83-91.
Dunka, B. 1984. A magyar racka (The Hungarian
Racka) In: Hortobágyi Nemzeti Park, Debrecen 9 p. In
Hungarian
Sheep Breeders' Ass'n 1996. Magyar
Juhtenyészt Szövetség idszaki Tájékoztatója.
(Temporary report of Hungarian Sheep Breeders' Association) Authors : Hajduk
P., Sáfár L. and Hrabovszky Pálné. Sziriusz Nyomda
Budapest. (In Hungarian)
Kiss, Barnabás Látits,
György
Awassi Corporation Institute of Animal
Husbandry
Bakonszeg, Hungary Gödöll
University of Agricultural Sciences
Gödöll, Hungary
---------------------------------------------
ABSTRACT
The Awassi Corporation imported 450 Awassi sheep from Israel in 1989-1990 to create a nucleus flock of a high-yielding dairy sheep in Hungary. For the purpose of becoming more acquainted which the reproductive and propagative attributes of the Awassi breed, we worked out a reproductive-biological programme based on hormone treatment. The goal of the examination was to create a propagation and milk production program which comes up to the domestic milk production system.
Key words: Awassi breed, reproduction ,
hormones
---------------------------------------------
INTRODUCTION
The Awassi Corporation is a privately owned
company specialized in the production of special sheep products. For increasing
the sheep milk production, the company imported 450 extremely high milking
ability Awassi sheep from Israel. The naturalization of the Awassi was completed
in Hungary, but we do not have exact knowledge of the reproductive and
propagative attributes of the breed. For the purpose of becoming more acquainted
with the exact data of the reproductive biology of the breed, we decided
to cooperate with the Animal Breeding Institute of the University of Agriculture
of Gödöll.
An oestrus inducing and synchronization experiment
was made with respect to the breeding goals in the three important and critical
seasons in 1996-1997, to clear up the results of the application of the classic
and time-honoured methods in the case of the high milk producing Awassi
flock.
The motivation of the planned experiment was the following:
· The literature concerning the reproductive
biology of this breed was poor.
· This breed is not native in Hungary and
the naturalization of the Awassi has not yet been completed.
· The ewes' endocrine system is much more
complicated (because of the high milk production) than in other Hungarian
breeds.
· The connection between the seasonality
of the reproduction and the milk production was not known.
· To know the possibility of programming
the reproduction and milk production of the breed through intensive
breeding.
The main goals of the examination were:
· to find out how the Awassi ewes' (both
those which were in lactation and those which had finished lactation) sexual
activity and synchronization of rutting can be worked out in Hungary, where
the main breeding season is based principally on the Merino breeding
season;
· to examine whether the rutting - induced
by hormones - would lead to normal ovulation;
· to fix the time of the ovulation in order
to determine the optimal time of the insemination;
· to conform to the original programme
(out of season lambing in Hungarian sheep industry);
· to be acquainted with the method and
result of how the Awassi ewes responded to superovulation (which was generated
by hormone treatment).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
According to the goals, the experiments were carried out in three different seasons :
· in breeding season (October 1996)
· in passing season (February-March
1997)
· in out of season (June 1997)
Table 1. The programme of the hormone treatment in June,1997
Calendar date |
Programme date |
Time |
Procedure |
June 04 |
Day 1 |
AM |
Insert sponges |
First group /non lactation/:
| Calendar date | Programme date | Time | Procedure |
| June 16 | Day 13 | 9 AM | Pulling out sponges and 1000 NE PMSG |
| June 17 | Day 14 | 9 AM | 1000 NE Choriogonin |
| June 19 | Day 16 | AM | Operation |
Table 1. continue
Second group:
Calendar date |
Programme date |
Time |
Procedure |
June 15 |
Day 12 |
8 AM |
1000 NE PMSG |
June 16 |
Day 13 |
8 AM |
Pulling out sponges |
June17 |
Day 14 |
8 AM |
1000 NE Choriogonin |
June 19 |
Day 16 |
AM |
Operation |
Third group:
Calendar date |
Programme date |
Time |
Procedure |
June 15 |
Day 12 |
8 AM |
1000 NE PMSG |
June 16 |
Day 13 |
8 AM |
Pulling out sponges |
June 17 |
Day 14 |
20 PM |
1000 NE Choriogonin |
June 20 |
Day 17 |
AM |
Operation |
Fourth group:
Calendar date |
Programme date |
Time |
Procedure |
June 15 |
Day 12 |
8 AM |
1000 NE PMSG |
June 16 |
Day 13 |
8 AM |
Pulling out sponges |
June 17 |
Day 14 |
8 AM |
1000 NE Choriogonin |
June 20 |
Day 17 |
PM |
Operation |
We put the regular and classical oestrus inducing and synchronization treatment into practice using 14 day-lasting progesterone +PMSG i.m. For the progesterone treatment sponges (Chronogest, Intervet) were used in all cases. The dosage of the PMSG (Folligon, Intervet) was modified according to the changing of the breeding seasons as follows:
The process of the ovary was examined by diagnostic
operation after the dosage of PMSG, in the same way in all cases, after 55-60
hours, 65-70 hours and 75-80 hours.
RESULTS
The Awassi ewe flock which were not in lactation
gave an excellent response to the classical oestrus inducing and synchronization
treatment during the fall breeding season. The ovulation proceeded between
65 and 80 hours after the hormone treatment (similar to the domestic
Merinos).
The oestrus inducing treatment with the dosage
of 750 NE PMSG also proceeded with good results in the passing season. The
growth and maturation of the folliculus proceeded uniformly to the haemorrhage
phase of the ovulation, but the time of the ovulation was late by a few hours
compared to the fall breeding season. But this change was not great enough
to give us reason to modify the exact time of the insemination.
The experiment which was done in early summer
was compared to the results of the earlier two experiments. The Awassi ewes
gave an extremely good response to the hormone treatment in that season which
is out of season in Hungary, and gave us a good reason for the efficiency
of flushing embryos from the donor Awassi ewes.
Table 2. Summarized results of three experiments
Experiment |
Time of the experiment |
Type of the treatment |
Numbers of the folliculus |
1st |
October 96 |
|
20 |
2nd |
February-March 97 |
|
16/11 ewes |
3rd |
June 97 |
|
97/18 ewes |
CONCLUSIONS
According to the results of the experiment, the adaptation to the Hungarian environmental circumstances in the case of the Awassi sheep was surely completed. It is well shown by the neuero-endocrine system, which is responsible for the normal reproductive and propagative attributes of the animals. In the "out of season" time the regular use of this method and the up-to-date hormone medicines can give us good possibilities for producing more sheep milk during this non-productive season. This way in those sheep flocks which were based recently on intensive milk production, we can milk one part of the ewes all year with the help of lactation programming.
REFERENCES
Becze, Gy. & Látits, Gy 1978.
Relationships of frequent lambings with meat production in sheep breeding.
In: Proceedings of the Research Institute for Animal Husbandry, Hungary
Herceghalom TOM. 4. N.1:161-165.
Kanyicska, B. - Látits, Gy. - Holdas,
S. & Szegedi, B. 1985. Study of the role of the endogenous opioids
in the regulation of the seasonal cycling in ewes. In: Reports of
the Research Centre for Animal Production and Nutrition. Gödöll,
67-73 p.
Kiss, B. 1996. Introducing the Awassi
Corporation. In: The shepherd. Vol. 41. 9: 38-41.
Kiss, B. - Kovács, P. - Székelyhidi,
T. & Kukovics, S. 1997. Breeding aims to develop sheep milk production.
In: Data Collection and Definition of Objectives in shhep and goat
breeding programmes: New programmes 137-141 p.
Látits, Gy. & Becze, J. 1975.
Az ovuláció idbeli lefolyása szezonon kívül
indukált ivarzásban, tekintettel a termékenyítési
idõ megválasztására. In:
Állattenyésztési Kutatóintézet
Közleményei II. kötet 1.szám 51-53 p.
Látits, Gy. 1989. Magyar Merinó
anyajuhok szezonális ivari mködése. In:
Kandidátusi értekezés, Herceghalom
Látits, Gy. 1986. Comparative
study of some oestrus-inducing hormone preparation. In: Reports of
the Research Centre for Animal Production and Nutrition. Gödöll,
67-73 p.
Látits, Gy. 1985. Examination
of sexual and breeding maturity of the Hungarian Merino ewe lambs. In:
Reports of the Research Centre for Animal Production and Nutrition.
Gödöllõ, 59-65 p.
Látits, Gy. 1987. Study of Hungarian
Merino ewes' ovarian function regarding factors that influence breeding seasons
on large scale production. In: 38th Annual Meeting of the Europian
Association for Animal production. Lisbon, Portugal
Látits, Gy. & Bártfai,
E. 1996. Climatic influence on the endocrine control of seasonal reproductive
activity in ewes. In: 47th Annual Meeting of the Europian
Association for Animal production.Lillehammer, Norway.
MEAT QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS OF HUNGARIAN SHEEP GENOTYPES
Molnár, Györgyi
Jávor, András
Department of Animal Production
and Nutrition
Debrecen University of Agricultural
Sciences
Debrecen, Hungary
---------------------------------------------
ABSTRACT
There are several qualification systems determining
live animal and carcass quality. Researchers and breeders use some: such
as the CT test used in Hungary. Trade uses others: the live animal and the
EUROP qualification. The third group of systems consists of methods used
by breeders and traders as well (boning and meat quality test after
slaughtering).
Traders use the simplest and the cheapest one,
but this is the least reliable, because it includes subjective elements.
There are differences among results of different methods, but certain amount
of observations makes the comparison possible. Therefore, rules of this process
must be determined. At the same time, differences in emerging Merino
qualification must be also determined, since different genotypes, slaughtering
age and individuals with different growing ability are considered.
Different aspects, relationships derived from
different genotypes, husbanding systems and that which may have a potential
role in selection need to be understood.
Analyses were conducted on eight genotypes (Suffolk,
Ile de France, German Mutton Merino, Bábolna Tetra, Prolific Merino,
British Milksheep, Hungarian Combing Merino, Prolific Merino x Texel F1).
Animals were from controlled breeding flocks. The control was the domestic
production flock. In total, 617 animals were slaughtered at the average weight
of 29.73 kg.
The objective is to provide information on domestic
breed choice, including rams for breeders, in order to develop their breeding
strategy considering slaughtering and meat quality characteristics important
in the European Union.
A further target is to determine the Hungarian
sheep variation, the relationship between parameters (body size, dressing
percentage, meat nutritional parameters, organoleptic quality etc.) and the
appearance, as well as how closely animals meet the requirements of the EU
in association with the subjective-objective qualification method. ,,TOBEC"
tissue qualification that has never been used on sheep is also carried out
with an EM-SCAN SA-3203 instrument.
What kind of other measurable factors can provide
information for the qualifier to decrease subjective elements? Are there
opportunities in rams of domestic varieties to improve meat quality_ These
are the most interesting questions covered in this work.
The followings are the most important
findings:
· The EUROP qualification results of the
domestic Merino flock don't meet demands. The Ile de France, the German Mutton
Merino and the British Milksheep, among analysed breeds, are suitable for
conformity improvement.
· Neither PSE nor DFD meat quality were
found in sheep breeds.
· Conformity data can be well predicted
from certain body parameters, therefore these can be utilized in direct
selection.
· Results of organoleptic qualification
supported the Merino popularity among consumers.
· The TOBEC method is suitable for determining
tissue composition of sheep; 4 500 Ft can be saved using this method.
An equation for sheep meat analyses was determined.
· The breeding value predicting equation
must be changed with the knowledge of results.
---------------------------------------------
INTRODUCTION
There are several qualification systems determining
live animal and carcass quality, as well. Researchers and breeders use some:
such as the CT test used in Hungary. Trade uses others: the live animal and
the EUROP qualification. The third group of systems consists of methods used
by breeders and traders as well (boning and meat quality test after
slaughtering).
Traders use the simplest and the cheapest one,
but this is the least reliable, because it includes subjective elements.
Nevertheless it is worthy to note that the CT-test and the classification
after slaughtering are very expensive. New, cheaper methods must be found
besides these. The TOBEC is such a method. Certainly, there are differences
among results of different methods, but certain amount of observations makes
the comparison possible. Therefore, rules of this process must be determined.
The objective of this study is to provide
information on domestic breed choice, including rams for breeders, in order
to develop their breeding strategy considering slaughtering and meat quality
characteristics important in the European Union.
A further target is to determine the Hungarian
sheep variation, the relationship between parameters (body size, dressing
percentage, meat nutritional parameters, organoleptic quality etc.) and the
appearance as well as how closely animals meet the requirements of the EU
in association with the subjective-objective qualification method. "TOBEC"
tissue qualification that has never been used on sheep is also carried out
with an EM-SCAN SA-3203 instrument.
What kind of other measurable factors can provide
information for the qualifier to decrease subjective elements? Are there
opportunities in rams of domestic varieties to improve meat quality_ These
are the most interesting questions covered in this work.
· The EUROP qualification results of the
domestic Merino flock don't meet demands. The Ile de France, the German Mutton
Merino and the British Milksheep, among analysed breeds, are suitable for
conformity improvement.
· Neither PSE nor DFD meat qualities were
found in sheep breeds.
· Conformity data can be well predicted
from certain body parameters, therefore these can be utilized in direct
selection.
· Results of organoleptic qualification
supported the Merino popularity among consumers.
· The TOBEC method is suitable for determining
tissue composition of sheep; 4 500 Ft can be saved using this method.
An equation for sheep meat analyses is determined.
· The breeding value predicting equation
must be changed with the knowledge of results.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Analyses were conducted on eight genotypes (Suffolk,
Ile de France, German Mutton Merino, Bábolna Tetra, Prolific Merino,
British Milksheep, Hungarian Combing Merino, Prolific Merino, Prolific Merino
x Texel F1). Animals were from controlled breeding flocks. The control group
was the domestic production flock. In total, 617 animals were slaughtered
at the average weight of 29.73 kg.
The following parameters were
analysed:
Live weight
Warm carcass weight
Carcass parameters:
· length of leg
· width of hindquarters
· back width
· width of shoulders
· length of body
· thickness of thigh
S/EUROP classification
· EU body classification category
· EU-fat cover category
Meat samples from the longissimus dorsi
at the 12th vertebra:
· pH 1 at 45th
minute
· pH 24
· tenderness and taste of meat
· oven loss
· smell
· dry-matter content
· crude fat content
· crude protein content
Body weights of individuals before, and the warm carcass weights after slaughtering were measured. During the first one hour the pH1 above the 12th vertebra and body parameters were recorded. Carcasses were also classified in accordance to S/EUROP on the same day. Body parameters were recorded by arc-compasses. Cold carcass weight and pH24 were measured just before cut. Samples were taken from the longissimus dorsi at the region of 12th and 13th vertebrae. These were analysed in the Central laboratory of the Debrecen Agricultural University. Methods used were from booklets of the National Research Institute for Meat Industry (Vadáné Kovács Mária, 1975). Tenderness and smell of meat were estimated on scales of 1-5 and 1-3, respectively. Crude fat and crude protein were analysed on the basis of MSZ. 5874-2/1985 and MSZ. 5874-8/1978 standards, respectively.
RESULTS
Table 1, containing the percentile distribution of EUROP classification results, shows that only 15 percent of the domestic commercial flock is in the acceptable (R) category. Excellent results of Ile de France, German Mutton Merino and the British Milksheep and the fact that Merino-breeding flocks surpass the domestic average should be underlined. The American Suffolk is underestimated in the EUROP system attributed to its long and lean body.
It is pointed out from results of correlation analyses presented in Table 2 that reliable correlation coefficients are between body weight and body length, backwidth, width of shoulder and thickness of thigh, as well. Furthermore, the EU score can be forecasted well from width of shoulder, thickness of thigh and backwidth.
Table 1. Percentile distribution of conformation and fat cover concerning EUROP
Conformation/%/ |
Fat cover (%) |
|||||||||||||
Country |
Category |
E |
U |
R |
O |
P |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|||
H |
Suffolk
|
- |
1.52 |
63.2 |
31.6 |
- |
- |
63.2 |
31.6 |
5.2 |
- |
|||
Ile de France
|
- |
65 |
35 |
- |
- |
- |
40 |
60 |
- |
- |
||||
German Mutton Merino
|
- |
55 |
45 |
- |
- |
- |
75 |
25 |
- |
- |
||||
Hungarian Combing Merino
|
- |
3.3 |
70 |
26.7 |
- |
- |
76.6 |
23.4 |
- |
- |
||||
Bábolna Tetra
|
- |
3.1 |
85.5 |
9.4 |
- |
- |
68.8 |
31.2 |
- |
- |
||||
Prolific Merino
|
- |
- |
100 |
- |
- |
- |
40 |
60 |
- |
- |
||||
British Milksheep
|
50 |
50 |
60 |
40 |
||||||||||
Producing flocks
|
- |
- |
14.8 |
69.0 |
16.2 |
4.8 |
70.7 |
24.0 |
0.5 |
- |
||||
NL(1) |
Texel
|
- |
43 |
54 |
3 |
- |
25 |
71 |
4 |
- |
- |
|||
Texel
|
2 |
57 |
39 |
2 |
- |
9 |
82 |
9 |
- |
- |
||||
Texel
|
3 |
47 |
47 |
3 |
- |
16 |
74 |
10 |
- |
- |
||||
GB(2) |
Suffolk x Mule
|
3 |
33 |
42 |
22 |
- |
||||||||
Oxford x Mule
|
- |
17 |
53 |
30 |
- |
|||||||||
Great Britain(2): 93 % of flock is in 2 and 3L categories
Source: 1: G. C. de Graaff, 1996; 2: MLC yearbook, 1996; 3: own data, 1995-1996
Table 2. Correlations among certain parameters
Live weight |
Warm carcass weight |
Length of leg |
Width of hindquarter |
Back width |
Width of shoulder |
Body length |
Thick-ness of thigh |
EU confor-mity |
|
| Live weight | 1 | ||||||||
| Warm carcass weight | 0.78 |
1 | |||||||
| Length of leg | 0.70 |
0.35 |
1 | ||||||
| Width of hindquarter | 0.36 |
0.79 |
0.20 |
1 | |||||
| Back width | 0.80 |
0.45 |
0.42 |
-0.09 |
1 | ||||
| Width of shoulder | 0.79 |
0.65 |
0.30 |
0.28 |
0.74 |
1 | |||
| Body length | 0.81 |
0.80 |
0.63 |
0.62 |
0.59 |
0.58 |
1 | ||
| Thickness of thigh | 0.72 |
0.73 |
0.37 |
0.38 |
0.38 |
0.55 |
0.53 |
1 | |
| EU-conformity | 0.49 |
0.59 |
-0.17 |
0.56 |
0.53 |
0.76 |
0.36 |
0.36 |
1 |
| Fat cover | -0.00 |
0.32 |
-0.31 |
0.44 |
0.10 |
0.07 |
0.29 |
-0.32 |
-0.43 |
Significance level: P_0,05
Four critics participated in the organoleptic qualification, and meat was classified on four aspects. Results of this process are presented in Table 3. There is no influence of genotype on pH right after slaughtering and after 24 hours (Table 4). Carcasses of all breeds correspond to scientific literature.
The following conclusions can be made:
· The meat of Merino was the most
palatable.
· Also, this meat was the most favourable
from the tenderness aspect, followed by the Texel F1 and German Mutton
Merino samples in decreasing order.
· The smell of Merino and Bábolna
Tetra sheep meat are the least favourable.
· The greatest quantity of chewing was
needed for the meat sample of Ile de France.
· EUROP classification results of the domestic
Merino flock were behind the desirable level.
· The Ile de France, German Mutton Merino
and the British Milksheep, among breeds analysed, were suitable for conformity
improvement.
· None of the breeds in the domestic flock
had extreme PSE or DFD values.
· Certain live body parameters were suitable
for forecasting values of conformity, therefore these were well utilized
in indirect selection.
· Results of organoleptic qualification
supported the Merino popularity among consumers.
Table 3. Results of organoleptic
qualification
| Tenderness | Taste | Smell | Number of biting | |
| Prolific Merino | 2.45 |
1.90 |
1.46 |
20.91 |
| (Prolific Merino x Texel) F1 | 2.79 |
2.29 |
1.92 |
20.17 |
| Hungarian Combing Merino | 2.35 |
1.62 |
1.37 |
21.18 |
| German Mutton Merino | 2.85 |
2.03 |
1.45 |
21.5 |
| Bábolna Tetra | 2.53 |
1.83 |
1.37 |
22.05 |
| Ile de France | 2.65 |
1.87 |
1.5 | 22.77 |
| Total | 2.6 | 1.92 |
1.51 |
21.48 |
Table 4. The most significant meat parameters (%)
DM % |
OVEN LOSS |
CP% |
CF % |
pH1 (45 min) |
pH24 (24 hour) |
|||
REL. |
ABS. |
REL. |
ABS |
|||||
|
30.32 |
23 |
73.31 |
22.12 |
22.77 |
6.99 |
7.15 |
6.60 |
|
29.18 |
24 |
76.02 |
22.08 |
19.78 |
5.88 |
6.71 |
5.71 |
|
30.63 |
29 |
76.58 |
23.29 |
21.17 |
6.62 |
6.93 |
5.78 |
|
30.29 |
22 |
73.06 |
21.70 |
24.09 |
7.72 |
6.9 |
6.00 |
|
28.74 |
22 |
73.98 |
21.12 |
22.09 |
6.51 |
6.9 |
5.79 |
|
29.83 |
24 |
74.59 |
22.06 |
21.98 |
6.74 |
6.90 |
6.02 |
REFERENCES
Molnár, Gy. & Jávor, A.
1997. The meat production of genotypes and the meat quality. In: Book
of Abstracts of the 48th Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal
Production, Vienna, Austria 209. p.
C. de Graaff 1996. - personal
communications
MLC yearbook, 1996
Kukovics, S. - Jávor, A. - Molnár,
Gy. - Ábrahám, M. & Molnár, A. 1997. A
juhtenyésztés minségének fejlesztése.
In: Agro-21" Füzetek, Az agrárgazdaság
jövképe, 17:. 76-100.
Fabregas, X. - Torre, C. - Caja, G. - Casals,
R. & Rivas, F. 1989. Comparison of carcasses of Ripollesa, Precoce
x Ripollesa, German Mutton Merino x Ripollesa lambs slaughtered at light
and heavy body weights. In: Agriculture, EUR-Publication, No. 11893:
383-388.
Meat and Livestock Commission (1990):
Sheep carcass classification results. In: Sheep yearbook 1990, 35-44
p.
Eraso, E. - Cabrero, M. & Garcia-de-Siles,
JL. 1982. Some aspects of carcass grading and characters in sheep.
In: Anales del Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agrarias, Granada,
No. 13: 27-31.
S/EUROP MEAT QUALIFICATION OF SOME SHEEP BREEDS IN HUNGARY
Molnár, András
Research Institute for Animal
Breeding and Nutrition
Herceghalom, Hungary
---------------------------------------------
ABSTRACT
Based on the results, the use of meat type breeds
could be recommended in improving the meat traits of the native Merinos even
if the light lamb production is preferred.
---------------------------------------------
INTRODUCTION
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Self-performance tests of ram and ewe lambs of seven breeds, namely Hungarian Merino, German Mutton-Merino, Prolific Merino, Bábolna Tetra, Suffolk, British Milksheep, and Ile de France were completed in the last two years. The test was followed by trial slaughters of five male and five female sheep of each breed.
RESULTS
CONCLUSION
S/EUROP classification of carcasses
|
Sex |
Conformation |
Fat cover |
||||||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
||
| Hungarian | ram | U0 |
R0 |
R- |
R- |
U- |
2+ |
2+ |
20 |
2+ |
3- |
| Merino | ewe lamb | R0 |
R0 |
R+ |
R0 |
U- |
2+ |
2+ |
3- |
20 |
2+ |
| German Mutton | ram | R0 |
R+ |
R+ |
R+ |
U- |
20 |
20 |
20 |
2+ |
2+ |
|
ewe lamb | R0 |
R+ |
U- |
U- |
R0 |
2+ |
2+ |
3- |
3+ |
3- |
| British Milksheep | ram | U0 |
R- |
U- |
R- |
R+ |
2+ |
20 |
20 |
2+ |
20 |
| ewe lamb | U0 |
U+ |
R- |
R0 |
R- |
20 |
30 |
20 |
3- |
30 |
|
| Suffolk | ram | R- |
R0 |
R+ |
R- |
R+ |
20 |
20 |
2+ |
2+ |
2+ |
| ewe lamb | U- |
U- |
R- |
R- |
R+ |
3- |
2+ |
2+ |
4- |
2+ |
|
| Bábolna Tetra | ram | R0 |
O+ |
R0 |
R0 |
R+ |
3- |
20 |
2+ |
3- |
20 |
| ewe lamb | R0 |
U- |
R0 |
U- |
R+ |
3- |
3- |
20 |
3- |
2+ |
|
| Ile de France | ram | R+ |
U0 |
U- |
U0 |
U0 |
30 |
2+ |
2+ |
2+ |
3- |
| ewe lamb | U- |
U- |
U0 |
U+ |
U- |
4- |
3- |
3- |
2+ |
20 |
|
+ |
||||||||||||||||
5 |
o |
|||||||||||||||
- |
||||||||||||||||
+ |
||||||||||||||||
4 |
o |
|||||||||||||||
- |
||||||||||||||||
+ |
* |
* |
||||||||||||||
3 |
o |
|||||||||||||||
- |
o |
* |
* |
|||||||||||||
+ |
o |
* |
oo**o* |
oo |
o |
|||||||||||
2 |
o |
o |
* |
o |
||||||||||||
- |
||||||||||||||||
+ |
||||||||||||||||
1 |
o |
|||||||||||||||
- |
||||||||||||||||
+ |
o |
- |
+ |
o |
- |
+ |
o |
- |
+ |
o |
- |
+ |
o |
- |
||
E |
U |
R |
O |
P |
Prolific Merino
+ |
||||||||||||||||
5 |
o |
|||||||||||||||
- |
||||||||||||||||
+ |
||||||||||||||||
4 |
o |
|||||||||||||||
- |
||||||||||||||||
+ |
* |
|||||||||||||||
3 |
o |
o |
* |
* |
||||||||||||
- |
o |
* |
||||||||||||||
+ |
|
|||||||||||||||
2 |
o |
o |
oo* |
|||||||||||||
- |
||||||||||||||||
+ |
||||||||||||||||
1 |
o |
|||||||||||||||
- |
||||||||||||||||
+ |
o |
- |
+ |
o |
- |
+ |
o |
- |
+ |
o |
- |
+ |
o |
- |
||
E |
U |
R |
O |
P |
German Mutton-Merino
+ |
||||||||||||||||
5 |
o |
|||||||||||||||
- |
||||||||||||||||
+ |
||||||||||||||||
4 |
o |
|||||||||||||||
- |
||||||||||||||||
+ |
* |
|||||||||||||||
3 |
o |
|||||||||||||||
- |
** |
* |
||||||||||||||
+ |
oo* |
o** |
* |
* |
||||||||||||
2 |
o |
* |
oo |
* |
||||||||||||
- |
||||||||||||||||
+ |
||||||||||||||||
1 |
o |
|||||||||||||||
- |
||||||||||||||||
+ |
o |
- |
+ |
o |
- |
+ |
o |
- |
+ |
o |
- |
+ |
o |
- |
||
E |
U |
R |
O |
P |
Ile de France
+ |
||||||||||||||||
5 |
o |
|||||||||||||||
- |
||||||||||||||||
+ |
||||||||||||||||
4 |
o |
|||||||||||||||
- |
* |
|||||||||||||||
+ |
||||||||||||||||
3 |
o |
o |
o |
o |
||||||||||||
- |
o* |
** |
** |
|||||||||||||
+ |
* |
oo |
o** |
|||||||||||||
2 |
o |
oo* |
o |
|||||||||||||
- |
||||||||||||||||
+ |
||||||||||||||||
1 |
o |
|||||||||||||||
- |
||||||||||||||||
+ |
o |
- |
+ |
o |
- |
+ |
o |
- |
+ |
o |
- |
+ |
o |
- |
||
E |
U |
R |
O |
P |
British Milksheep
+ |
||||||||||||||||
5 |
o |
|||||||||||||||
- |
||||||||||||||||
+ |
||||||||||||||||
4 |
o |
|||||||||||||||
- |
||||||||||||||||
+ |
||||||||||||||||
3 |
o |
** |
** |
|||||||||||||
- |
** |
|||||||||||||||
+ |
oo |
oo |
||||||||||||||
2 |
o |
** |
oo |
oo |
oo** |
|||||||||||
- |
||||||||||||||||
+ |
||||||||||||||||
1 |
o |
|||||||||||||||
- |
||||||||||||||||
+ |
o |
- |
+ |
o |
- |
+ |
o |
- |
+ |
o |
- |
+ |
o |
- |
||
E |
U |
R |
O |
P |
Bábolna Tetra
+ |
||||||||||||||||
5 |
o |
|||||||||||||||
- |
||||||||||||||||
+ |
||||||||||||||||
4 |
o |
|||||||||||||||
- |
||||||||||||||||
+ |
* |
|||||||||||||||
3 |
o |
o |
* |
o |
||||||||||||
- |
** |
ooo* |
* |
|||||||||||||
+ |
** |
o |
oo |
|||||||||||||
2 |
o |
o |
oo* |
o |
||||||||||||
- |
||||||||||||||||
+ |
||||||||||||||||
1 |
o |
|||||||||||||||
- |
||||||||||||||||
+ |
o |
- |
+ |
o |
- |
+ |
o |
- |
+ |
o |
- |
+ |
o |
- |
||
E |
U |
R |
O |
P |
Suffolk
+ |
||||||||||||||||
5 |
o |
|||||||||||||||
- |
||||||||||||||||
+ |
||||||||||||||||
4 |
o |
|||||||||||||||
- |
* |
|||||||||||||||
+ |
||||||||||||||||
3 |
o |
|||||||||||||||
- |
* |
|||||||||||||||
+ |
* |
*oo |
*o |
|||||||||||||
2 |
o |
o |
o |
|||||||||||||
- |
||||||||||||||||
+ |
||||||||||||||||
1 |
o |
|||||||||||||||
- |
||||||||||||||||
+ |
o |
- |
+ |
o |
- |
+ |
o |
- |
+ |
o |
- |
+ |
o |
- |
||
E |
U |
R |
O |
P |
SHEEP AND GOAT PRODUCTION SYSTEMS IN HUNGARY
Kukovics, Sándor Jávor,
András
Research Institute for Debrecen University
of Agricultural Sciences
Animal Breeding and Nutrition Debrecen,
Hungary
Herceghalom, Hungary
---------------------------------------------
ABSTRACT
The production conditions of sheep and goat farming in Hungary has basically changed in the last 6-8 years. There were changes not only in the property structure but also in the production system elements. The number of small ruminant farmers has significantly increased while the animal stock of Hungary has been broken up into small stocks. This new situation has influenced the use, the breeding, the keeping and the feeding of animals. Owing to this and to the market, the costs and yields have also been changed and this might lead to a change in the production systems applied. In this paper we analyse the main characteristics of production systems and their effects on sheep and goat farming at present in Hungary.
Key words: farm size, available land, breed,
market demands, reproduction systems, farming type, costs and incomes.
---------------------------------------------
INTRODUCTION
The production system applied is influenced
by several factors. The most important factor is the farm size, the size
of the land used, the species, the type of the enterprise, the market demand,
the price and the revenue. These factors are only slightly modified by the
employment, the use of land and the social security. However, labour has
a significant effect on the system.
At the end of the 1980s large-scale farming
was characteristic of the sheep sector in Hungary but in 1997 the majority
of farms are small-scale private farms. In the goat farming sector, small-scale
farming was predominant even in the last decades; however, there were also
some large scale goat farms (cooperatives and state farms). At present goat
breeding farms are private farms of small or large scale.
We would like to present here the main
characteristics of the present sheep and goat farming systems.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In the evaluation of the sheep and goat breeding systems, we applied the data of the survey of the Sheep Produce Council and the Agricultural Chamber of Hajdú-Bihar county. These included data on 1 300 sheep breeding farms in the country and 273 in the county of the period between 1994 and 1996. The questionnaires used in the survey - containing all the accessible information on the two kinds of animals - have been prepared by the Institute for the two organizations. In the evaluation of goat farmers data we used the information obtained from the various associations. A small part of the processed data of the questionnaires received will be presented in the description of the characteristics of the production systems.
RESULTS
Farm size
The survey of the Sheep Products' Council shows
that by the end of 1996, 6 799 natural and legal entities were dealing
with sheep farming in Hungary. Ewe stock in the property of individual farmers
was 78.8 percent; 21.2 percent did farming in cooperatives in the forms of
Ltd companies and other small companies (Table 1). In the case of individual
farmers the average number of ewes did not reach 100 (96.6), however the
size of farms varied considerably (1-5000). In the case of the 107 cooperatives
the average number of ewes was 959, at Ltd companies 1 025, while at
small companies there were 670 ewes. The average number referring to the
whole stock was only 119 animals; be profitable, two or three times more
animals would be required. In more than 4 950 farms less than 100 ewes
were to be found (Jávor et al., 1997). Such small-scale sheep farming
is not at all or only slightly profitable.
In general, farms of more than 300 ewes are
profitable. The data available on the goat stock are not sufficient. The
average farm size was several tens of animals; in most farms there were 10-15
nanny goats and their offspring, although there were also farms of several
hundreds of animals at the beginning of 1997. However there were not more
than 5 farms like that, and there were not more than 20 where there were
more than 100 goats. The total number of animals was estimated to be between
50 000-70 000. Obtaining a correct number is impossible as the
number of goats in sheep farms is unknown at present.
Table 1. Distribution of flock sizes in Hungarian sheep farms (1996)
| No. of ewes | Private farms | Companies | Altogether | ||||||||||
| No. of farms | No. of ewes | No. of farms | No. of ewes | No. of farms | No. of ewes | ||||||||
1-10 |
1 294 |
8 503 |
0 |
0 |
1 294 |
8 503 |
|||||||
11-50 |
2 540 |
69 691 |
5 |
179 |
2 545 |
69 870 |
|||||||
51 -100 |
1 100 |
87 322 |
7 |
541 |
1 107 |
87 863 |
|||||||
101-200 |
870 |
132 571 |
16 |
2 505 |
886 |
135 076 |
|||||||
201-300 |
400 |
101 375 |
19 |
4 828 |
419 |
106 203 |
|||||||
301-400 |
173 |
60 644 |
15 |
5 408 |
188 |
66 052 |
|||||||
401-500 |
107 |
49 400 |
15 |
6 823 |
122 |
56 223 |
|||||||
501-1000 |
104 |
72 739 |
48 |
34 695 |
152 |
107 434 |
|||||||
1 001-2 000 |
21 |
28 805 |
34 |
49 238 |
55 |
78 043 |
|||||||
2 001-3 000 |
7 |
16 856 |
12 |
29 245 |
19 |
46 101 |
|||||||
3 001-4 000 |
2 |
7 478 |
5 |
17 146 |
7 |
24 624 |
|||||||
4 001-5 000 |
1 |
4 145 |
3 |
13 079 |
4 |
17 224 |
|||||||
| 5000- | 0 |
0 |
1 |
8 047 |
1 |
8 047 |
|||||||
| Altogether: | 6 619 |
639 529 |
180 |
171 734 |
6 799 |
811 263 |
|||||||
Species
Surveys show that the majority of sheep stock was Merino (Table 2). The survey performed in the most important sheep farming county has justified this distribution (Jávor et al., 1996). Ninety-five percent of this was Merino. This distribution determined the production system. Merinos are mainly used for meat and wool production, and a small part is used for milk production (in the county survey the crossbred milking stock was not included).
Table 2. The breed structure (%)
| Flock size |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
1 |
- |
20 |
87.71 |
5.00 |
0.30 |
3.46 |
1.24 |
7.53 |
21 |
- |
50 |
84.20 |
3.33 |
2.53 |
3.29 |
0.60 |
5.50 |
51 |
- |
100 |
82.12 |
6.08 |
0.65 |
12.90 |
3.23 |
2.06 |
101 |
- |
200 |
76.42 |
8.13 |
0.81 |
9.76 |
0.81 |
4.07 |
201 |
- |
300 |
87.26 |
4.71 |
0.00 |
4.57 |
2.31 |
1.14 |
301 |
- |
500 |
80.66 |
10.52 |
1.38 |
3.97 |
1.07 |
2.41 |
501 |
- |
1 000 |
64.63 |
10.53 |
4.21 |
15.37 |
0.00 |
5.26 |
1 001 |
- |
3 000 |
90.42 |
9.17 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.42 |
3 001 |
- |
97.50 |
0.00 |
2.50 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
In the last years a significant part of the
sheep stock has been rented, and in the categories of 1 000-3 000
the proportion of ewes as a function of the stock has reached 25 percent.
The data of the county survey mentioned above show that the proportion of
rented sheep has decreased in 1996; its proportion was 1.5-2.5 percent of
the whole sheep sector.
Regarding goat farming, the stock distribution
by species structure was not so homogeneous. Several kinds of imported species
were found in the stocks (Sanen, Alpin, Toggenburg), however the majority
of the stock was of various coloured types of the native Hungarian species
and the crossbred types of the imported species.
Land use and feeding
The size of the land used influenced the number of animals kept on the area. The number of animals and the area used (rented and owned) are directly proportionate. Forty-two to forty-eight percent of sheep farmers had their own grazing fields while the others used rented lands. Seventy-six to eighty-two percent of these farmers also worked in plant production. The majority of the farms were of mixed farming; that is besides sheep farming they were also working in other fields of production (Table 3) (Kukovics-Jávor, 1995/a).
Table 3. Land used according to different flock size
Flock size
|
Private property (ha) |
Rented land
|
Arable land
|
Pasture
|
||||||||||||
x |
s |
x |
s |
x |
s |
|||||||||||
1 |
- | 20 |
5.2 |
7.5 |
2.9 |
12.7 |
3.9 |
7.7 |
1.1 |
3.9 |
||||||
21 |
- | 50 |
6.8 |
9.5 |
2.4 |
6.7 |
5.6 |
13.4 |
5.4 |
28.3 |
||||||
51 |
- | 100 |
15.6 |
19.1 |
10.1 |
21.9 |
9.9 |
13.9 |
10.5 |
18.0 |
||||||
101 |
- | 200 |
16.4 |
24.8 |
24.2 |
101.3 |
19.5 |
77.0 |
13.7 |
26.2 |
||||||
201 |
- | 300 |
36.7 |
33.6 |
101.9 |
370.6 |
26.3 |
70.5 |
44.5 |
67.6 |
||||||
301 |
- | 500 |
31.3 |
51.6 |
254.9 |
831.3 |
33.5 |
63.3 |
65.4 |
77.6 |
||||||
501 |
- | 1 000 |
376.1 |
1 349.3 |
111.5 |
182.8 |
345.5 |
1 159.8 |
108.1 |
146.2 |
||||||
1 001 |
- | 3 000 |
1 437.0 |
2 572.7 |
921.1 |
1 671.4 |
1 290.3 |
1 817.4 |
287.4 |
311.4 |
||||||
3 001 |
- | 2 150.0 |
3 040.6 |
4 000.0 |
2 828.4 |
2 000.0 |
2 828.4 |
2 250.0 |
1060.7 |
|||||||
The area available determined the feed resources.
In general, in small-scale farms feed was purchased (roughage and fodder),
while in large-scale farms feed was ensured by the farmers' own production.
Sixty-seven percent of sheep farmers could make use of stubble fields and
only 59 percent were able to make use of other by products. This has
significantly increased the feeding costs and - especially in late summer
and mid-autumn - has significantly modified the production systems. On 44-47
percent of the farms the cereal fodder was purchased (mainly pelleted mixed
fodder); the rest ensured feeding by the farms' own production. Seventy percent
of the farms produced roughage by themselves and 50 percent of the farms
purchased it. Only 20-25 percent of the farms used fermented fodder (senage,
silage) The material required for fermented fodder was produced by 50 percent
of the farms; the rest purchased it.
The area used by goat farms and the types of
feeding were basically similar to sheep farming discussed above. Grazing
type of feeding was determinant, only a few farms were semi-intensive or
intensive.
Type of enterprise
Based on the results of the surveys sheep farming
can also be categorized by the type of enterprise. Of the sheep farmers,
685 are small-scale farmers, 11 percent entrepreneurs, 9.5 percent economic
organizations (cooperatives, Ltd companies, other small companies). There
are 1.5 percent full-time and 10 percent part-time sheep farmers. Categorizing
this way is mainly important regarding income and expenses.
The significant part of goat farmers are small-scale
farmers, and most of them do farming part-time; moreover, this is mainly
the responsibility of the wives or children.
Market demand
Almost all the lambs produced in the Hungarian
sheep industry is exported to Italy. This market requires a perpetual supply,
nevertheless there are special seasons (Easter, Christmas, Ferragusto) which
cover two-thirds of the total sales. For example, in 1996 - calculating on
a quarterly basis - 264, 234, 206 and 206 thousand live lambs, respectively
(altogether 910 thousand heads), were exported to Italy. In addition to this
6, 5.5, 13 and 15.5 thousand slaughtered lambs, respectively, were exported
to Italy (Jávor et al. 1997/b). Our export market demands mainly lambs
with a live-weight between 16 and 27 kg, nevertheless the weight of lambs
exported ranged from 13 to 40 kg. Taking into consideration that the majority
of the farms' income is generated from selling lambs, the farms concentrate
on producing lambs within the above-mentioned weight range. In most cases
lambs of 16 - 24 kg are sold, so meat production per ewe is lower than could
be expected. The suckling lambs (16-20 kg) and the weaned lambs (20-24) sold
consume small amounts of feed, therefore the expenses and the revenues are
low. In many cases it was less advantageous keeping the lambs until they
reached 25-30 kg, since the excess did not result in proportionally higher
revenues.
The permanent demand influences the utilized
lambing peroid as well as the applied lambing system (Tables 4 - 5). The
small-size sheep farms traditionally operate with a lambing period for Easter
sale, and with the increase of the stock the lambings are divided among the
three lambing periods. With the increase in the sheep stock, the proportion
of the sheep farms using traditional lambings have greatly decreased and
the proportion of farms using frequented and divided lambing system are
increasing. (Kukovics- Jávor 1995 a/, b/).
Only a low proportion of the domestic sheep
stock has been milked in the past few years. The number of sheep that have
been milked is about 60-70 thousand heads, most of which are Merino, however
an increasing number of pure-bred milking and cross-bred stocks have also
been milked. The cheese processed from milk is sold for Kashkaval and cream
cheeses, which have been exported to 26 countries. Considering the fact that
compared to the demand the amount of sheep milk available for processing
is small, the major objective is to increase the amount, although the nutritional
value of the sheep milk was of high importance when determining the price.
The market demand for goats did not have
a great influence on goat producers. Most of them have produced kids to be
sold at Easter; after Easter the amount of meat for sale sharply decrease.
The market demand is not permanent, though in the spring and summer months
there was moderate interest for goat kids meat at a substantially lower price.
Despite the demand, only a small number of kids were sold at the end of the
year. The goat farmers are involved in kidding once a year and milking
afterwards. Keeping meat goats will be the opportunity of the future. Large-scale
cheese-making plants have not been established. Several small producers make
home-made cheeses and cottage-cheese type products from their own milk.
Cooperatives at micro-regional and regional levels started to be established
in 1997. The influence of these cooperatives on the production system expected
to be observed beginning next year.
Of the disintegrated stock,
10 000-12 000 kids weighing from 8 to 18 kg have been exported
per year, mostly to Italy together with the sheep shipments. Due to the work
of the local cooperatives and breeding associations, this number can increase.
Table 4. The utilized lambing seasons
(%)
Flock size |
|
|
|
|
||
1 |
- |
20 |
73.59 |
3.04 |
16.31 |
6.43 |
21 |
- |
50 |
70.91 |
6.37 |
20.85 |
6.95 |
51 |
- |
100 |
48.39 |
10.00 |
30.85 |
11.26 |
101 |
- |
200 |
50.54 |
11.95 |
24.05 |
13.68 |
201 |
- |
300 |
45.94 |
12.03 |
25.94 |
16.09 |
301 |
- |
500 |
47.67 |
15.33 |
28.83 |
8.17 |
501 |
- |
1 000 |
33.25 |
22.75 |
25.50 |
18.00 |
1 001 |
- |
3 000 |
50.58 |
9.58 |
34.42 |
5.42 |
3 001 |
- |
50.00 |
17.50 |
32.50 |
0.00 |
|
Table 5. Lambing systems used (%)
Lambing |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
1 |
- |
20 |
76.97 |
9.52 |
13.49 |
|||||||||||
21 |
- |
50 |
58.86 |
20.57 |
20.57 |
|||||||||||
51 |
- |
100 |
42.34 |
24.32 |
33.33 |
|||||||||||
101 |
- |
200 |
36.56 |
27.96 |
35.48 |
|||||||||||
201 |
- |
300 |
23.53 |
32.35 |
44.12 |
|||||||||||
301 |
- |
500 |
13.33 |
26.67 |
60.00 |
|||||||||||
501 |
- |
1000 |
10.53 |
26.32 |
63.16 |
|||||||||||
1001 |
- |
3000 |
8.33 |
33.33 |
58.34 |
|||||||||||
3001 |
- |
0.00 |
50.00 |
50.00 |
||||||||||||
Expenses and revenues
Perhaps only determining the number of stock
consumes more energy than accurately determining the expenses. The reason
for this is that in most cases the producers did not include the counter-value
of their own work in their calculations, even if they did so a very low
counter-value was calculated. Regarding sheep farmers the expenses for
calculations are acceptable, but similar figures from the goat farmers were
not accessible to us as such registration had not existed.
The result of the above-mentioned county survey
revealed that the farm size (the number of ewes) fundamentally influences
the expenses per ewe (Table 6), and internal division of expenses is modified
by the type of the enterprise (Table 7) (Jávor et al. 1996). It seemed
that the increased number of sheep increases expenses, but wage and other
expenses increased parallel with the growing number of sheep. Besides, the
expenses could be determined more accurately. As for the various types of
enterprises the biggest differences could be observed regarding the wage,
feeding and the so-called other expenses. The charges of the capital employed
were not included in these figures.
Table 6. Costs as a function of the stock size
| Number of ewe | <20 |
20-50 |
50-100 |
100-300 |
300-500 |
500-1000 |
>1000 |
| Cost per ewe (HUF) | 2 310 |
3 897 |
4 445 |
4 154 |
4 318 |
6 665 |
6 976 |
| Total number of ewe (pc) | 59 |
1 454 |
3 654 |
13 034 |
10 756 |
10 915 |
19 580 |
Table 7. Percentage distribution of costs by type of enterprise
| Cost | Small-scale farmer |
Independent farmers |
Economic unit
|
Full time |
Part-time-
|
| Labour | 8.2 |
13.1 |
30.6 |
22.2 |
7.1 |
| Veterinary | 4.4 |
2.7 |
1.9 |
4.6 |
5.5 |
| Fodder | 52.9 |
44.8 |
42.1 |
41.5 |
30.8 |
| Energy | 9.5 |
7.4 |
3.8 |
1.2 |
6.7 |
| Shearing | 3.0 |
2.3 |
1.3 |
0.7 |
3.1 |
| Services | 9.8 |
5.0 |
4.4 |
1.0 |
5.2 |
| Premises rental fee | 1.5 |
9.4 |
1.4 |
0.0 |
0.5 |
| Other cost | 10.6 |
15.3 |
14.5 |
28.8 |
41.2 |
| Total | 100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Considering other elements of the production
system, the expenses and the income varied substantially (Table 8). The table
based on the analyses of the above-mentioned county survey contained the
income and the aggregated expenses. When preparing the calculations (1995)
the average procurement prices were the following: wool 71 HUF/kg; lamb 376
HUF/kg; milk 56 HUF/kg; manure 163 HUF/tonne. (Partly as a result of the
inflation the prices have considerably risen). The average prices in 1997
are 125, 425, 105 and 210 HUF, respectively (the expenses - in accordance
with the inflation - have risen faster). In the given county only Merino
type sheep were milked, therefore the milk production (income) should be
assessed considering this fact. The charges of the capital employed were
not included in these figures, either.
With the increased number of stock the demand
for human resources has also risen. In small farms sheep farming took place
on a family basis, in larger farms employees were also needed. The number
of the employees have been gradually growing and consequently the expenses
of production are increasing.
Table 8. Revenue and costs as a function
of the various characteristics of farming
Income / % distribution of ewe and income (HUF) |
Costs/ Ewe (HUF) |
|||||||
From wool |
From meat |
From milk |
From manure |
Total
|
Total |
|||
| sheep farming of meat and milk | 6 % |
71 % |
23 % |
0 % |
6 154 |
7 498 |
||
| sheep farming of meat and wool | 6 % |
93 % |
0 % |
1 % |
6 285 |
5 455 |
||
| enterprises of sheep farming only | 5 % |
94 % |
0 % |
1 % |
5 433 |
4 003 |
||
| enterprises of other agricultural activities | 6 % |
89 % |
4 % |
0 % |
6 611 |
5 344 |
||
| enterprises of other non-agricultural activities | 6 % |
91 % |
3 % |
1 % |
5 283 |
7 747 |
||
| feeding fodder of own production | 5 % |
93 % |
0 % |
2 % |
5 848 |
4 852 |
||
| feeding own and purchased fodder | 6 % |
90 % |
4 % |
0 % |
6 227 |
5 955 |
||
| feeding purchased fodder only | 7 % |
88 % |
4 % |
1 % |
7 078 |
6 139 |
||
| grazing stubble fields | 6 % |
90 % |
3 % |
0 % |
6 668 |
5 823 |
||
| not grazing stubble fields | 5 % |
91 % |
3 % |
1 % |
5 038 |
5 917 |
||
| feeding by-products | 6 % |
89 % |
4 % |
1 % |
6 565 |
6 544 |
||
| not feeding by-products | 6 % |
93 % |
0 % |
1 % |
5 894 |
4 104 |
||
| rented grazing fields | 6 % |
86 % |
7 % |
1 % |
6 541 |
6 769 |
||
| owned grazing field | 5 % |
95 % |
0 % |
0 % |
7 082 |
5 005 |
||
| Mixed grazing field | 7 % |
91 % |
1 % |
1 % |
5 592 |
5 417 |
||
| 100 inspected stock by vet | 6 % |
87 % |
7 % |
0 % |
4 815 |
7 656 |
||
| Inspected partly by vet | 7 % |
88 % |
4 % |
0 % |
5 626 |
6 830 |
||
| Not inspected by vet | 5 % |
91 % |
3 % |
0 % |
6 610 |
5 080 |
||
CONCLUSION
The production systems of sheep and goat farming
in Hungary have developed based on the following factors:
· number of ewes and female goats: The
majority of the ewes were in small flocks on private farms. The profitability,
in general, could be reached with at least 300 ewes in production. The average
size of nanny goats was much smaller (10-15 heads), most of the goat
breeders/keepers were only part-time farmers;
· the breed used: It was known that the
production level of Merinos was lower than expected; this breed group was
dominant in the national flock. Farms having 100-200 or 500-1000 heads of
ewes had better breed distribution than the others. In goats, the native
Hungarian breeds were dominant, but several other breeds were available on
those farms where the production level was higher;
· the size of land for utilization and
the available feed: Most of the farms were mixed producers (cropping and
breeding). The smaller part of farmers had their own grazing land, the others
used rented pastures. As the land size was growing the rates of feed
self-production was increasing;
· market demand: The dominant product was
the live lambs exported to Italian market. This market was demanding mainly
light-weight lambs and kids, mostly concentrating on three periods; however,
the exportation could be continuous during the year. Along with the increasing
flock size the rates of frequent and divided lambing systems were increased
and the age of the annual lambing system was reduced;
· income and expenses: The production costs
per ewe per year were increasing along with the flock size. Part of them
were understandable (e.g. the small farms did not pay any tax), but the others
were not. The fodder cost was the dominant one, but the so called other cost
had an increasing ratio. The meat was the dominant source of income, but
the profitability was modified by the other traits of production
systems.
REFERENCES
Jávor, A.- Kocsis, I.- Kovács,
Z.- Molnár, Gy. & Polonkai, L. 1996. Self Confidence of the
Shepherd (in Hungarian ). In: Hungarian Sheep Farming, Vol.5, No.
7: 5-7. July, 1996.
Jávor, A.- Békési Gy.-
Kukovics, S.- Molnár, Gy. & Koleszár T. 1997a.
Characteristic data of the Hungarian Sheep Farming (in Hungarian ).
In: Hungarian Sheep Farming, Vol. 6, No. 2: 4. Feb. 1997.
Jávor, A.- Békési, Gy.-
Kukovics, S.- Molnár, Gy.- Nábrádi, A. & Molnár,
M. 1997b. Sheep Farming Trade (in Hungarian ). In: Hungarian Sheep
Farming, Vol. 6, No. 5: 6-7. May 1997.
Kukovics, S. & Jávor, A. 1995a.
Present State of Sheep Farming. (in Hungarian). In: Hungarian Sheep
Farming, Vol. 4, No. 6: 3-5. June 1995.
Kukovics S. & Jávor, A. 1995b.
Sheep Farming Today (II.) (in Hungarian ). In: Hungarian Sheep Farming,
Vol. 4, No. 7: 6-8. July 1995.
THE FIRST SEVEN YEARS OF BRITISH MILK SHEEP IN HUNGARY
Kukovics, Sándor
Molnár, András
Research Institute for
Animal Breeding and Nutrition
Herceghalom, Hungary
ABSTRACT
Several rams were sold from the flock to breeders and farms where the aim was the improvement of prolificacy, milk production and lamb rearing traits (Table 3).
---------------------------------------------
Table 1. The average litter size
| Line
Year |
K |
L |
N |
S |
Z |
Av. |
No. of
|
|
3.25 |
2.21 |
2.20 |
2.31 |
2.45 |
2.48 |
53 |
|
1.44 |
1.54 |
1.50 |
1.91 |
1.64 |
1.62 |
54 |
|
1.67 |
1.52 |
1.78 |
2.00 |
2.23 |
1.70 |
87 |
|
2.04 |
1.80 |
2.20 |
1.92 |
2.05 |
2.00 |
115 |
|
1.73 |
1.78 |
1.89 |
2.17 |
2.02 |
1.93 |
115 |
|
(Merino x Langhe ) F1 x British Milksheep |
2.11 |
36 |
||||
|
1.78 |
1.84 |
1.67 |
2.57 |
2.09 |
1.95 |
88 |
|
2.19 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
2.33 |
2.55 |
2.30 |
83 |
Table 2. Milk yield data of the ewes
1991 |
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
|||||||||||||||
x |
CV% |
x |
CV% |
x |
CV% |
x |
CV% |
x | CV% |
x | CV% |
|||||||||
| Number of ewes | 54 |
51 |
82 |
103 |
142 |
91 |
||||||||||||||
| Lactation length (day) | 114 |
20.8 |
116 |
44.0 |
147 |
34.9 |
92 |
38.5 |
84 |
48.4 |
105 |
33.9 |
||||||||
| Total milk yield (l) | 94.9 |
47.4 |
129.4 |
57.6 |
128.7 |
47.8 |
78.9 |
51.0 |
56.9 |
79.6 |
84.5 |
46.4 |
||||||||
| Daily milk yield (l) | 0.853 |
46.1 |
1.115 |
35.8 |
0.877 |
31.7 |
0.859 |
34.9 |
0.678 |
41.4 |
0.807 |
34.8 |
||||||||
| Fat % | 4.3 |
10.2 |
4.7 |
13.2 |
5.5 |
9.0 |
5.6 |
13.1 |
5.8 |
11.3 |
5.3 |
11.0 |
||||||||
| Protein % | 5.5 |
6.3 |
5.4 |
7.1 |
5.7 |
5.9 |
5.5 |
6.5 |
5.4 |
7.3 |
5.6 |
6.6 |
||||||||
| Lactose % | 5.1 |
3.5 |
5.4 |
3.7 |
5.1 |
2.8 |
5.2 |
5.2 |
5.3 |
3.8 |
5.2 |
2.9 |
||||||||
Table 3. The average daily weight gain of the lambs up to weaning
Weaning
|
Litter
|
Ram |
Ewe lamb |
|||||
Year |
ADG (g) |
ADG (g) |
||||||
n |
x | CV% |
n |
x | CV% |
|||
1991 |
35 |
1 |
1 |
351.0 |
- |
3 |
382.0 |
26.9 |
" |
" |
2 |
21 |
344.7 |
18.3 |
31 |
319.6 |
16.1 |
" |
" |
3 |
13 |
281.7 |
23.5 |
16 |
276.0 |
22.2 |
" |
" |
4 |
3 |
236.3 |
13.9 |
1 |
292.0 |
- |
" |
" |
5 |
1 |
263.0 |
- |
1 |
330.0 |
- |
Average |
- |
- |
39 |
316.1 |
18.4 |
52 |
310.0 |
16.4 |
1992 |
25 |
1 |
8 |
449.5 |
17.1 |
14 |
452.0 |
12.7 |
" |
" |
2 |
15 |
352.6 |
22.5 |
18 |
353.0 |
18.5 |
" |
" |
3 |
3 |
310.3 |
24.4 |
6 |
355.7 |
10.8 |
" |
" |
4 |
7 |
395.3 |
16.9 |
4 |
375.0 |
20.8 |
Average |
- |
- |
33 |
384.3 |
21.1 |
42 |
389.7 |
18.6 |
| Table 3. continue | ||||||||
Weaning
|
Litter
|
Ram |
Ewe lamb |
|||||
Year |
ADG (g) |
ADG (g) |
||||||
n |
x | CV% |
n |
x | CV% |
|||
1993 |
25 |
1 |
8 |
407.1 |
41.9 |
13 |
394.0 |
25.2 |
" |
" |
2 |
15 |
361.5 |
25.9 |
18 |
303.6 |
21.6 |
" |
" |
3 |
17 |
305.5 |
38.2 |
15 |
298.8 |
31.8 |
" |
" |
4 |
4 |
242.7 |
46.0 |
10 |
294.9 |
20.4 |
Average |
- |
- |
44 |
352.9 |
26.8 |
56 |
329.1 |
22.4 |
1994 |
35 |
1 |
15 |
353.4 |
22.5 |
17 |
326.5 |
17.8 |
2 |
35 |
344.7 |
18.9 |
30 |
356.1 |
17.3 |
||
3 |
28 |
322.9 |
22.8 |
26 |
323.0 |
19.1 |
||
4 |
9 |
363.1 |
14.8 |
4 |
358.7 |
18.1 |
||
Average |
- |
87 |
340.7 |
20.4 |
77 |
338.5 |
18.3 |
|
1995 |
35 |
1 |
12 |
326.9 |
23.6 |
10 |
341.9 |
21.7 |
2 |
29 |
286.5 |
26.7 |
21 |
264.2 |
31.2 |
||
3 |
16 |
250.2 |
20.1 |
20 |
290.2 |
23.7 |
||
4 |
6 |
245.3 |
25.8 |
10 |
226.3 |
24.1 |
||
5 |
1 |
194.0 |
- |
2 |
227.5 |
20.8 |
||
Average |
- |
64 |
279.7 |
26.4 |
63 |
278.0 |
28.3 |
|
1996 |
40 |
1 |
13 |
368.4 |
29.9 |
12 |
368.4 |
24.9 |
2 |
40 |
361.5 |
26.7 |
28 |
331.9 |
21.2 |
||
3 |
26 |
299.7 |
30.5 |
18 |
281.2 |
21.1 |
||
4 |
9 |
328.0 |
39.1 |
3 |
315.2 |
4.9 |
||
Average |
- |
88 |
340.3 |
34.2 |
61 |
322.7 |
21.5 |
|
1997 |
45 |
1 |
10 |
332.8 |
21.9 |
10 |
335.2 |
18.9 |
2 |
33 |
317.3 |
11.5 |
31 |
286.4 |
12.4 |
||
3 |
34 |
285.9 |
10.6 |
26 |
258.1 |
12.4 |
||
4 |
10 |
259.7 |
20.3 |
12 |
282.3 |
18.2 |
||
Average |
- |
87 |
298.9 |
17.5 |
79 |
282.6 |
16.4 |
|
Table 4. The average daily gain of the (Merino x British Milksheep)F1 lambs during
Litter |
Ram lamb |
Ewe lamb |
Together |
||||||
Size |
n |
Average |
CV % |
n |
x |
CV % |
n |
x | CV % |
1-3 |
80 |
391.1 |
8.1 |
64 |
318.7 |
9.4 |
144 |
356.7 |
11.4 |
1 |
24 |
401.9 |
3.2 |
11 |
325.8 |
7.8 |
35 |
378.0 |
0.5 |
2 |
51 |
388.7 |
9.2 |
48 |
317.8 |
9.5 |
99 |
351.4 |
5.2 |
3 |
5 |
363.1 |
8.7 |
5 |
306.2 |
10.6 |
10 |
334.6 |
12.1 |
THE PRESENT STATE
& MAIN PROBLEMS OF
SHEEP-BREEDING IN ARMENIA
Marmarian, Youri
Armenian Agricultural Academy
Yerevan, Armenia
---------------------------------------------
ABSTRACT
---------------------------------------------
Why sheep-breeding occurred in the given state
After the collapse of the former USSR, definitive
work has been carried out in the direction of reform and privatization of
land, cattle and other agricultural production in the Armenian agrarian economics
sector.
However, due to the slow pace of reform
accomplishment, lack of necessary conditions for the efficient use of farm
productive forces, small areas of peasant farms and low productivity,
unsatisfactory organization of supplies and services as well as the durable
blockade of the Republic, difficulties connected with realization of production,
etc., the expected results of the reforms and privatization still leave much
to be desired.
The main strategic objective of Armenian agriculture
in the near future must be the increase of the level of food provision in
the Republic, considerable improvement of foodstuffs, ensuring food safety
and mobilization of the local productive potential.
In the past period of agrarian reforms which
are being accomplished under the fundamentally new economic relations conditions,
properly chosen reform policy (from the strategic point of view) hasn't been
supported and enforced by drastic practical steps. Along with privatization,
the necessary substructures providing the efficiency of the village productive
inner forces have been formed; especially the utmost important problems of
organization of agricultural material-technical supply and services, the
processing and realizations of agricultural raw materials, the processing
of the branch taxing and insurance systems haven't been ultimately
solved.
In fact, after land and cattle privatization,
the farmer has been left all alone against numerous difficulties. In the
current situation, it is necessary to work out and fulfil complex projects,
the realization of which will lead to complete improvement of the given
sub-branch of the agro-production system in the Republic, and integration
into international agro-production structures.
Is there a basis for sheep-breeding development in Armenia?
Almost half of the land area of Republic of Armenia (29 740 km2) is adequate for crop growing and pastures; the remaining part is desert and mountainous areas, which are situated on different degrees of slopes (Table 1).
Table 1. Land covering (% relating to the given group)*
Area |
According the slope degree |
||||||
| Type of soil | km2 |
% |
up to 3o |
3o-7o |
7 o-12 o |
12o-20o |
20o &above |
| Arable lands | 5 052.76 |
17.75 |
49.7 |
31.9 |
12.6 |
4.8 |
1.0 |
| Perennial plantations | 705.86 |
2.48 |
74.7 |
15.8 |
4.9 |
3.6 |
1.0 |
| Other perennials | 1 377.77 |
4.84 |
40.8 |
30.7 |
15.7 |
9.0 |
3.8 |
| Forests and bushes | 4 155.20 |
14.60 |
9.8 |
17.7 |
22.3 |
28.6 |
21.6 |
| Pastures and others | 17 172.70 |
60.33 |
25.4 |
30.0 |
18.1 |
15.9 |
10.6 |
| Total | 28 464.30** |
100 |
29.4 |
28.2 |
17.3 |
15.2 |
9.9 |
Of pastures, 30 percent are suitable solely
for sheep and goats, as they are extremely isolated and on slopes.
Since sheep are mostly pasture animals, it
becomes possible to develop high-yielding sheep breeding and to increase
the total number of livestock on the given feed base in our Republic.
Labour resources also exist in Armenia. Thirty
percent of the population is rural; about 285 000 people work in the
field of agriculture.
Due to the creation of farms, the number
of people working in agriculture has been considerably increased by 60 000.
By 1997, 345 000 people were working in agriculture. Agriculture is
carried out both by labour forces and corresponding specialists; most of
the latter don't work in their professional fields because of the lack of
positions.
The dynamics of sheep number and their productivity in Armenia
The agro-production complex of the Republic includes 321 000 peasant farms and 1 200 collective farms (1997). Peasant farms, each of which has an average 1.4 ha area comprise 93.1 percent of privatized land. However, not all the farms are breeding sheep. According to FAO data, Armenia occupies the first place among other CIS countries in the reduction of live stock head number (especially heads of sheep). Thus the number of sheep and goats in 1991-1993 in Moldova was reduced by 1 percent, in Kasakhstan - 5 percent, Belarus - 10 percent, Azerbaijan - 20 percent and Armenia - 33 percent.
Table 2. The dynamics of sheep and goat heads and their productivity
| Index | Meas. |
1986 |
1987 |
1988 |
1989 |
1990 |
1991 |
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
| Sheep & goats | 1000 heads |
1 901.9 |
1 818.8 |
1 729.6 |
1 450.1 |
1 291.5 |
1 186.2 |
1 029.0 |
873.0 |
735.9 |
603.7 |
582.0 |
| Out of which dams | 1000 heads |
1 225.1 |
1 164.0 |
1 133.7 |
935.7 |
850.8 |
828.1 |
728.4 |
634.7 |
675.5 |
408.7 |
392.8 |
% |
64.6 |
64.0 |
65.5 |
64.5 |
65.8 |
69.8 |
71.2 |
72.7 |
64.6 |
67.7 |
69..9 |
|
| Wool
productivity of one sheep (dirty weight) |
kg |
2.4 |
2..3 |
2.4 |
2..3 |
2.2 |
2.1 |
2.1 |
2.2 |
2.0 |
2.4 |
2.4 |
| Lambs and kids from 100 dams | head |
78 |
76 |
77 |
86 |
82 |
76 |
70 |
74 |
78 |
85 |
84 |
| Average annual milk productivity of one dam | litres |
17.5 |
- |
16.9 |
- |
11.2 |
12.0 |
14.3 |
7.9 |
8.5 |
9.0 |
12.0 |
| Has been produced Mutton-live weight | 1000 tones |
31.3 |
27.2 |
28.7 |
26.2 |
20.0 |
18.6 |
17.6 |
18.1 |
16.2 |
- |
- |
| Wool
produced (raw weight) |
1000 tones |
4.6 |
4.1 |
2.7 |
3.3 |
2.8 |
2.4 |
2.1 |
1.9 |
1.7 |
1.4 |
1.3 |
| Sheep milk
produced |
1000
|
20.4 |
18.0 |
15.6 |
12.1 |
9.2 |
8.6 |
9.1 |
6.0 |
3.4 |
3.6 |
3.72 |
During the recent decade, head number of sheep
has been reduced 3.4 times including sheep ewes 3.2 times: Wool output of
one sheep has always been low, but in 1995-96 it had already been restored
and has reached the pre-privatization level. The same phenomenon is observed
in the number of lamb produced per 100 dams. As compared with 1986, in 1996
the sheep milk yield had been reduced 5.5 times and the milk productivity
of one sheep decreased 1.5 times; lamb productivity had decreased (approximately
2 times); wool production was down (3.5 times). All these reduction had a
negative influence upon the efficiency of sheep food production. It's worth
mentioning that the percentage of animal loss has been considerably increased,
which amount to 40 percent in sheep breeding.
Losses in sheep-breeding as well as the losses
of other branches of cattle-breeding are caused by numerous factors: legally
imposed social/material living standards of the population, purchasing capacity,
the laws of market relations (which are functioning chaotically), high prices
of feed and energy, frequent blockades etc. At present, sheep breeding is
carried out in an extensive way, which we must get rid of as soon as possible
and to proceed to an intensive way of sheep-breeding and food
production.
The exact number of farms breeding sheep and
the number of sheep on each farm has not been estimated. However, it's known
that there are not many farmers possessing large numbers of sheep-mainly
they keep 1-50 heads; the number of farmers possessing more heads (i.e. 100-200
heads) is very small.
The whole production of sheep breeding (i.e.
milk, meat) is realized inside the country. The wool is processed inside
the country in small amounts, and the rest of it is stored at producers and
is nearly not processed. The reasons for not processing the wool are numerous:
the variety of wool (fine, half-fine, half-coarse, coarse), the low quality
of wool (the dirty state of wool, the presence of defects) the low price
at the market (600-800 drams, 1 US$ = 500 drams), the lowest price of state
purchase (100-400 drams), the inactivity of worsted and cloth factories in
the Republic and so forth. In 1996 Russia bought only 50 tonnes of wool.
The sheep hide is not used wholly, and part
of it is exported abroad by individual people.
The price of 1 kg of mutton fluctuates from
900-1 100 drams. Different kinds of cheese are made from sheep milk,
and 1 kg of sheep cheese (if it's made of pure sheep milk) costs
1 800-2 000 drams.
In Armenia half-coarse-wooled and Armenian
half-fine-wooled crossbreed sheep are bred.
According to the plan, 25 percent of sheep heads
must be Armenian half-fine-wooled, each of which has a different range. Very
few local sheep breeds of low productivity have been preserved (e.g. Bozach,
Mazekh, Kharabakh. It is worth making plans concerning the clarifying of
the pedigree composition of heads of sheep.
There have been no services established in Armenia
concerning sheep-breeding (societies, stations for artificial insemination,
special sites for genetic work, etc): The genetic work of sheep is carried
out only by the chair of private cattle-breeding of Armenian Agricultural
Academy (Balahovit teaching and experimental farm as well as "Barekamoutsiun"
joint-stock company in Kamo, with 400 heads of sheep all in all). And the
Research institute of sheep Breeding (State Genetic Farm in Aragats where
there are 400 heads of half-coarse-wooled sheep).
The system of keeping sheep is pasturable and
nursery. At nursery stage, at best one feed unit is given per head. The feeding
is non-balanced and low.
At present there are no practical plans as well
as no help to the farmers on sheep breeding, either by the state by some
other organization.
Sheep breeding has no alternatives but to be
conducted in all regions of the Republic with meat-milk-wool trends. In 1989
in our Republic, a factory of preliminary wool processing was founded in
Ararat, equipped with modern technological machinery. But it does nearly
no work because of the lack of funds and the difficulties with the realization
of goods.
This factor as well as the low level of
international prices created great difficulties for thousands of owners occupied
with sheep-breeding. Faced with the lack of purchasing power of the population,
the owners cannot process the wool at reasonable, profitable prices, which
today is very expensive to do in our Republic. The realization of profitable
processing of wool will be of considerable support to our farmers and will
influence the development of this sub-branch.
Which items are considered to be the
most important in the development of sheep breeding in Armenia?
· The working out of scientists expeditor
research plan for clarifying the sheep population their breed and
technology.
· Identifying farmers engaged in genetic
and marketable sheep-breeding, and the long-term planning of their
development.
· The foundation of a marketing
service.
· The integration of Armenian sheep-breeders
and corresponding international organizations, information exchange, and
the organization of scientific visits.
· The development of a farmers' teaching
curriculum on sheep-breeding. Introduction of advanced scientific and production
experiment and technology.
· The working out of investment plans for
the treatment of fur and foreskins sheep and wool.
· The financing and organizing of competitive
specialists and applied topics and works on generic-selective sheep
breeding.
· The realization of state subsidy and
investment policy before the foundation of normal market relations and the
improvement of the branch (i.e. sheep-breeding).
· The foundation of the forage reserve
- protected grazing lands.
· The development of environmental policy,
the improvement of pastures, their preservation and rational usage.
· The working-out of a plan to introduce
sheep producing improved breeds.
· This is the list of those items not
yet incomplete, which will help Armenia at this transitional period to rescue
sheep breeding from collapse to preserve the generic fund of pedigree sheep
as well as of local sheep, activate the work of collective farms, to increase
the production of competitive food and raw material and the integration of
Armenia into international sheep-breeding organizations.
· The working out of collaborative plans
on wool sale in Armenia.
· The working out of plan, concerning the
farmers' collaboration engaged in sheep-breeding who must have a corresponding
financing.
REFERENCES
Armenia. The Challenge of reform in the Agriculture sector, Yerevan, 1995.