Posted March 1997
Bertinoro I
High-level Technical Seminar:
Private and Public Sector Cooperation
in National Land Tenure Development in Eastern and Central Europe
University Residential Centre
Bertinoro, Italy
1-5 April 1997
Land Tenure and Property Markets in Lithuania
Public viewpoint | Private viewpoint
Public viewpoint
Extracted from "Public and Private Sector in National Land Tenure" by Bronislovas Mikuta, Chief, Land Cadastre Division of the National Land Survey of Lithuania
Background
After the reestablishment of independence of Lithuania, significant changes took place in a short time. Very important laws on restoration of ownership rights in real property, laws on land and other real property registration, on taxation and other laws and sub-legal acts were passed.
Security restrictions on maps, geodesy coordinates and information on land were removed. State enterprise, financed from the state budget and with the help of donors assistance, started to produce small and large scale maps, make the restoration of ownership rights in real property, to implement land reform and perform main works of land cadastre and land register. Private sector produces tourist and special maps, make cadastre surveying of land parcels, evaluate real property. Private notaries approve agreements and other transactions related to property.
Existing laws, providing for the integration of land and other real property registers, is a basis for the security of restituted ownership rights in creating confidence between private owners, farmers, business men and banks. There are greater possibilities that banks will provide credits under reasonable interest rate and business men will invest more money to the economy of the country and agriculture.
National Land Survey of Lithuania is partly responsible for the works of land reform, land cadastre and land register and bears full responsibility for the national geodesy reference system, topographic maps in scale 1:5000 and smaller.
The existing institutional structure for the management of land and other real property is not convenient for users and it does not meet the interests of the public and the state in developing land and property market in Lithuania and integrating Lithuanian agriculture and economy into the European Union. At present the possibility for reorganization of existing structures is under discussions and the establishment of Real Property Agency under the Government of Lithuania is being considered.
Main strategic objectives are the following:
- acceleration of the process for the restoration of ownership rights in real property;
- establishment of unified real property registration system;
- creation and maintenance of geodetic background and topographic maps on a new coordinate system of Lithuania;
- integration of unique parcel and other real property identifiers;
- to allot sufficient amount of money for the restoration of ownership rights in real property, land cadastre and production and maintenance of maps;
- creation of geo-reference data base;
- provision of private sector with data and necessary maps;
- management and security of archive data;
- attraction of finances and increasing of cost recovery;
- improvement of services provided to the customers;
- preparation of laws and their improvement;
- development of state policy related with real property management and security.
Summary
- It is very important that politicians, government and ministries officers, bankers, business men and other citizens realize economic importance of real property management and importance of the creation of real property markets in Lithuania for economic development of the country. There is a need to improve strategic program for real property privatization and management, and to provide for the main guidelines of activities that land market would start its operation more rapidly.
- To create legal, financial and organizational circumstances for agriculture to focus into economically managed land parcels. To search new ways that persons entitled to restitution of ownership in land and who are not able to work it, the right of ownership transfer to the others or sell to those who have possibilities to work it.
- It is very important to pass laws and to improve the existing ones which must determine how land market should function and to create circumstances for more effective operation of the land market. Laws, regulating the restitution of citizens' ownership in land and legislation on land reform, should be stable.
- There are clearly problems resulting from the novelty of the concept of the real property market. There is in particular a lack of practical experience of the functioning of real property markets and of information available on transaction and values. Data recorded in registers on sale price is understood to be very unreliable for tax avoidance reasons.There is a need to find the ways how to collect data about real property sale and ensure that this information is reliable, everybody can access and understand it. Such information can help:
- to improve people's understanding about real property markets, publicity of the markets;
- to make decisions on real property management;
- make decisions on how, what and when real property tax should be established
- To create a unified real property registration system. Registration of land and buildings (apartments) should be made in one organization but not in different ones. The creation of effective and secure real property registration system is an essential thing for the successful market functioning and welfare of the country's economy.
- An unified real property registration system will stimulate, increase and support investments and secure citizens' ownership rights in land, public and state interests. Banks and business men can more rely on the system which guarantee ownership rights, when farmers and other producers could borrow money mortgaging their property in order to get funding for equipment, machinery, seeds, fertilizes, construction works and other investments.
- Low speed of land privatization hinders the development of land market. There is no stable legislation. Private sector is not sufficiently involved in land reform works. There is no competition between organizations handling land reform. Land reform is funded from the state budget means and the efficiency of use of these means is hard to estimate.
- What ministries and organizations are responsible for the registration of land and other real property. Not settled organizational structure do not allow to develop effective and secure real property registration system. Bureaucracy barriers between separate ministries do not allow to create effective real property management and registration system.
- The development of land market is hindered by the fact that while selling or giving as a gift land parcel it is required to make precise surveying of parcel boundaries. The price for survey is higher because GPS network densification is not enough everywhere. There are such cases when the price for survey of a small land parcel boundaries in rural areas is nearly the same as sale price of a parcel.
- There is a tendency that it is proposed to make very precise maps in rural areas. This idea is supported by some foreign countries which would like to sell their own equipment and technology. Cheap and fast mapping technologies should be introduced for rural areas, as for example Orthophoto mapping. New maps are necessary for land parcel surveying and land registration.
- There is a lack of specialists both in public and private sector who are able to understand market economy and can reasonably work in the process of land and property management. There is a demand for skilled real property valuers who are acquainted with real property legislation in detail, with building constructions, economy and management.
- It is very important to make a research of existing levels of real property market transactions in urban and rural areas and try to find means how to introduce real property market value as soon as possible according which real property taxes and compensation for property taken for public needs is calculated.
- Countries-donors should take into consideration legal, technical, institutional and financial issues, related with real property market, of the recipient country. There is a need to evaluate properly the choice of technologies, to attract public and private sector and academic institutions in creating and implementing modernization programs of land administration system.
- It is very important to have overall strategy for land market development. There is a lack of recognition that institutional and management issues are more important than technical issues, for example procurement of equipment.
- The creation of land market is a long-term process. It requires proper investment in order to speed up the creation of land market. At present it is impossible to recover the initial costs. It is an investment to the future welfare. There is a need to introduce a new policy - fees to the users should be increased gradually and dependence on the state budget should gradually reduce.
- There should be closer co-operation of public and private sectors, distribution of activities introducing control of works. There is a need to stimulate the competition between state enterprises and when there is proper time to privatize some parts of their activities.
Private viewpoint
Extracted from "Activity of Private Sector Entities in the Environment of Emerging Property Market" by Kaestutis Kristinaitis, Lithuanian Association of Property Valuers, Vilnius, Lithuania
Trends of Development of Land Market
If we compare the number of deals of purchase, sale, lease, mortgage and other real estate transactions that took place on the market in 1996 against the number of real estate properties privatised over the period, we see that 10.9% of gross number of real estate properties were involved on the market while the same of parcels of land is just 1.99%. To my opinion, the two main circumstances have been hindering development of land market:
- improper legal framework
- improper management of land
Legal Framework
- The constitution of the Republic of Lithuania:
- Previous edition of Art. 47 of the constitution read the following: "Land, inland water bodies and forest may be owned by citizens of the Republic of Lithuania and the State exclusively". Therefore, no corporate body was allowed to purchase land. It was only available on a lease basis.
- The revised edition of Art. 47 yet to be enforced reads the following: "Any local government, other national entity, any expatriate entity that meet the criteria listed in the Constitution Amendment Law for the European and Transatlantic Integration carrying on a business in Lithuania may be allowed to purchase land of non-agriculture use pertaining to the buildings or structures directly requisite for its major business. The terms and conditions of the above purchase are stipulated by the Constitution Amendment Law". After the above amendment of the constitution is enforced, all the entities will be able to claim some 3-4% of current Land Fund of the Republic of Lithuania. Therefore, they would be hardly able to put more life into the market.
- Different laws and resolutions of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania have imposed certain regulations over private land property, i.e.:
- restrictions of use and management;
- restrictions of building activity;
- restrictions of change in use of land;
- other restrictions.
- The laws related to regulation of privatisation, restitution, lease of land, and management of public land are subjected to too frequent revisions.
Land Management. Responsibilities of management of land, i.e. privatisation, restitution, the Land Cadastre, recording of ownership and other rights to land, national mapping, etc. are distributed throughout several institutions:
- Ministry of Agriculture
- Ministry of Forest Farming
The two above Ministries have been merged recently.
- Ministry of Construction and Urban Development
- Ministry of Country Protection
- Ministry of Environmental Protection
- Ministry of Justice
- Ministry of Local Governments and Reformations
Actually, each institution is responsible for a separate class of land in accordance with its use. The Ministry of Agriculture and Forest Farming is responsible for direct management of two classes of land, i.e.:
- agriculture land - 60%
- forest farming land - 31%
It accounts for 91% of gross land funds of the Republic of Lithuania.
Several additional institutions are involved in assisting the Ministry in its land management operations.
The above institutional land management organisation fails to meet the expectations of population and the State itself. Management processes are of low performance and costs-ineffective. The interests of individual institution prevail frequently over general target.
Considering the Lithuania's experience of the last six years of independence, the current institutional land and real estate management organisation is highly bureaucratic and inconvenient. It fails to assure that the expectations of the State towards development of domestic land and real estate market and its integration into the European Union are met.
At the moment, the Government has been considering an opportunity to rearrange the above organisation by separating institutional responsibilities from non-institutional land management responsibilities and by incorporating a single public land and real estate management body.
Conclusions
Research into options of development of cooperation between private and public sectors in the field of development of assets market has concluded the following:
- public institutions fail to utilise the potential and experience of private sector entities in privatisation and restitution as wells as development of assets market and in particular:
- in privatisation and restitution of rural land, preparation of land reformation land management designs, carrying out land surveys for Land Cadastre to facilitate implementation of Land Information System;
- in the transactions of sale, lease and exchange on open market for cash money of buildings and parcels owned by the State;
- in providing solutions and implementing market-based approaches of estimation of real estate value for taxation.
The potential of private sector is least utilised in the fields of privatisation and management of land and other assets. Failure to do so has been directly hindering implementation of the Land Information System and preventing further progress of development of property market.
On the other hand, private sector has proved by the services it provides to the market it possesses adequate qualifications and experience to serve the needs of the parties involved in property transactions. Supply of the services makes a positive impact on the market activity.
It should be noted that in addition to private surveyors, notaries, valuers and real estate brokers, private law attorneys, business consultants, stock brokers and other entities are involved on the same market.
Though private sector is well developed in Lithuania, the following problems have to settled in the nearest future:
- systematic post-graduate and in-service training
- professional indemnity insurance
Solution of the above two problems will make a positive impact on further development of cooperation between private and public sectors.
Go to: Land Tenure in Eastern/Central Europe - Introduction | Intermediate report | Agenda | Participants | FAO introduction | Discussion paper | Digital ortho-photography | Country summaries: Australia | Lithuania | Estonia | United Kingdom | Latvia | Poland | Hungary