
October 2005
A slightly modified version of this paper was originally prepared for the 13th meeting of the OSCE Economic Forum, “Demographic Trends, Migration and Integrating Persons Belonging to National Minorities: Ensuring Security and Sustainable Development in the OSCE Area” held in Prague (Czech Republic) on 23–27 May 2005. Paper was prepared by Libor Stloukal and Christian Woerner, FAO Population and Development Service; it was presented in Prague by Mária Kadlecíková of the FAO Subregional Office for Central and Eastern Europe, Budapest (Hungary).
The political, demographic and ethnic composition of contemporary Europe is the result of long, complex and often conflicting historical, social and economic developments. The protection of persons belonging to national minorities has become an inherent part of policies on human rights and social inclusion in most European countries. In recent years, particular attention has been paid to national minorities within the context of the European Union enlargement to include countries of Central and Eastern Europe. However, it should not be forgotten that members of national minorities live in all European countries, including Western, Northern and Southern Europe.
Official statistics often glide over the ethnic shifts under way in European countries; and for those countries where statistics do not discriminate between national groups, it is difficult to find reliable figures. However, there can be no doubt that national minorities in Europe are highly heterogeneous: each has its own history and can have a very specific position within the society in general, with its own social and economic development in particular.
There are several key questions to be taken into consideration when addressing the role of a national minority in the development process:
Rural development is critical for reducing poverty and hunger – two extreme forms of economic vulnerability which can have dire consequences for members of national minorities. Compared with other parts of the world, European countries are favourably placed to deal with poverty and hunger. Yet significant poverty does exist in the region, and national minorities in rural settings are often more at risk than those in urban areas.
Incidents of poverty and hunger vary greatly from country to country, as well as within countries. Some of the principal reasons for food insecurity among members of national minorities are: poverty; marginalization; war and conflict (with ensuing problems of refugees and displaced persons); natural disasters; weak state institutions to ensure the safety of food supplies to national minorities; and the breakdown of social safety nets. The following groups can be assumed to be particularly vulnerable to rural poverty:
Growth in agricultural production and non-farm activities in rural areas can be a significant force in fighting poverty and hunger and reducing social exclusion, also among members of national minorities. Because the needs of the poor and disadvantaged are diverse, there is a need for rural development approaches to go beyond an exclusively agricultural focus. An integrated approach to rural development includes:
There are various provisions in the legal and policy systems of European countries, their civil society institutions, and international bodies – the OSCE, the European Union, the Council of Europe, the United Nations system, to name just a few – that are important for national minorities and could be effectively used to further their human rights and improve their status.
A human rights approach should have an impact on our vision of development. It aims at translating people’s basic needs into fundamental rights. It further identifies the duties and obligations of all stakeholders to ensure that the basic needs are met. The value of human rights-based approach lies primarily in its potential to alleviate injustice, inequality and poverty, and to empower the vulnerable and marginalized themselves.
In November 2004, the FAO Council adopted the Voluntary Guidelines to Support the Progressive Realization of the Right to Adequate Food in the Context of National Food Security. These Guidelines represent the first attempt by Governments to interpret the right to adequate food as a basic human right and to recommend actions to be undertaken for its realization. The Guidelines are by no means restricted to the legal dimension of the right to food but spell out the political and socio-economic ingredients of a sound food security strategy. In particular, the Guidelines are very vocal on the need to give priority to vulnerable and disadvantaged groups.
It is clear that the promotion of the right to adequate food, accompanied by distinct mechanisms of accountability, as proposed in the above-mentioned FAO Guidelines, can contribute to protecting the rights of national minorities. In the process of implementing an empowering approach to development that views national minorities as partners in the developmental process, the first step to be taken is to ensure their right to food. This approach should lead to good governance, inclusion of national minorities and increased equality among citizens.
FAO strongly supports the rights-based approaches being pioneered in some European countries, which have held or are organizing seminars and workshops to seek ways to operationalize the right to food at the national level. Some are held by national human rights institutions, NGOs or universities, others by the governments themselves. FAO believes that such national dialogues are essential towards effective implementation of the right to food for all, which could lead to meaningful policy and legal measures. The lessons learned through these processes will be crucial for further progress in improving the well-being of national minorities.
The matter of Europe’s national minorities has been neglected in research and policy debates for decades. Since the unprecedented social and economic changes following the end of the Cold War, it has become a human rights and security matter of the first degree, and the need for catching up is enormous.
Assessing the socio-economic well-being of national minorities in European countries is a complex endeavour, and generalisations are dangerous to make. While there is now a deeper understanding of the nature and extent of national minority problems in different parts of the region, it should be recognized that there are no simplistic solutions. Remedial policies must be developed by individual countries themselves, with a realistic view on the costs that can be budgeted for and the resources available for addressing the particular problems found in a given country.
Agricultural and rural development interventions represent a potentially powerful tool for improving the well-being and participation of national minorities located in rural areas and/or engaged in agriculture. In this way, agriculture and rural development can contribute to solving minority problems in general. Countries should therefore be encouraged to use agricultural and rural development policies to address the needs of their national minorities. Likewise, countries should be supported in their efforts to integrate the right to food into national programmes to protect national minorities and promote their human rights. Far from being a matter of mere political correctness, the advancement of national minorities is an important strategic issue. Countries which do not capitalize on the full potential of all segments of their societies are misallocating their human resources and compromising their competitive potential.
For more information, see
|
|