Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


Mixed farming systems and the environment (Continued)

THE ROLE OF LIVESTOCK IN MITIGATING LAND DEGRADATION, POVERTY AND CHILD MALNUTRITION IN MIXED FARMING SYSTEMS: THE CASE OF COFFEE-GROWING MIDLANDS OF SIDAMA - ETHIOPIA

MAURO GHIROTTI

Central Technical Unit, Directorate General for Cooperation and Development, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, via S. Contarini 25,00194 Rome - Italy

Introduction

Land degradation in the tropics is strongly associated with human population growth. The latter phenomenon is quite marked in humid areas and in the temperate highlands (Jahnke 1982). Notably in the plateaux of Sub-Saharan Africa and Asia, several pastoral systems have gradually evolved into mixed farming, in order to cope with such pressure (Ruthenberg, 1980). Land is more intensively utilized as population density increases since mixed systems are more efficient than specialized crop or livestock systems (McIntire et al.,1992). In fact, livestock crop integration allows:

Livestock provide not only draught power, manure, milk, meat and by-products. As in traditional pastoral societies, they have cash buffer and insurance functions. The former function also supports the use of inputs in crop cultivation which in turn generates higher on-farm productivity for both crops and livestock (Brumby, 1986).

On the other hand, human population growth is responsible for decreasing land plot size. In Rwanda and Burundi, this pressure led to stocking rates much lower than in other East African highlands (50 TLU/km2 vs. 100–130 TLU/km2, according to the zone) due to increasing conversion of pasture into cultivated land (de Leeuw and Reid, 1995). In these areas, the doubling time of human population is around 20 years. In Sidama, Southern Ethiopia, a similar pattern was already described in 1975 by Ayele who stated that “cultivation has been and is invading livestock grazing areas. As population increases, people prefer to cultivate crops rather than breed livestock”.

The progressive disappearance of livestock is a key destabilizing factor responsible for the involution of the system characterized by nutrients deficiencies and degradation. It may lead to conflicts between different groups sharing resources within the system. This trend is more evident in the absence of marketing opportunities for livestock and/or crop products (Ruthenberg, 1980; Steinfeld et al., 1997).

In Sidama Awraja (or district) a WHO/UNICEF Joint Nutritional Support Programme (JNSP) was implemented during the second half of the 1980's. The area was selected because it presented a variety of environmental, socio-economic and cultural situations. This study, carried out as part of the programme activities, illustrates the role played by livestock in alleviating land degradation, poverty and the resulting child malnutrition in integrated systems.

The Sidama Awraja

Located in the northern part of Sidama Province, the Sidama Awraja occupies some 5900 km2, with a human population of 1.5 million. The Awraja is one of the most densely inhabited areas of Ethiopia, with 254 people/km2, in contrast to the national average of 32 people/km2.

The region is divided into three main ecozones, each with different agricultural systems and development potential, (Figure 1). The lowlands are situated in the Rift Valley and range between 1100 m and 1600 m in altitude. Because of poor soil and an average annual rainfall of only 400 mm, the main human activity in this zone is pastoralism. The next belt, the midlands, ranges from 1600 to 2000 m and averages more than 1500 mm of precipitation annually. About 70% of the Awraja's human population is concentrated in this very fertile zone (Raya, 1987). It has sustained rapid population growth because it provides a favourable environment for agriculture and development. The farming system, a combination of horticulture and animal husbandry, is characterized by the cultivation of false banana (Ensete ventricosum), which is the principal staple food, and cash crops. Major cash crops include coffee (Coffea arabica, a wild shrub indigenous to southern Ethiopia) and chat (Catha edulis, whose leaves are chewed as a stimulant). Incomes in the midlands are considerably higher than in the other two zones and in the rest of Ethiopia (Anonymous, 1984). A tarmac road and the majority of the Awraja's dirt roads are found in the midlands, as are the main services and the regional and district capitals. The territory above 2000 m constitutes the highlands, whose potential for cereal production has not yet been fully exploited also because of poor communication networks. At present, abundant pasture allows highland farmers to raise large numbers of livestock, including horses that supply most of the transport in this zone.

The principal ethnic group in this zone is the Sidama, a Cushitic-speaking people. Traditionally cattle raisers, their way of life has changed, especially in the midlands, as cultivation is invading grazing areas. For example, seasonal movements towards neighbouring highlands in search of better pasture are practised no more. Nowadays, they live together with the Oromo pastoralists (the Guji) who used to be their traditional enemies. “Sidama”, which means “foreigner” was the name used by the Oromo during their expansion from the eastern Ethiopian highlands into the Awraja (Biasiutti 1959). Other ethnic groups found in the area are the Wolaita and the Amhara.

The study

JNSP activities were concentrated in the midlands of Sidama. According to the results of a baseline survey carried out by the programme, 36% of children in the Awraja had chronic and 41% acute malnutrition. The problem was surprisingly more severe in the midlands.

A key question still needed an answer: within the same community, which are the most vulnerable HHs and why?

Several studies have clearly pointed out the influence of the socio-economic status, as well of environmental factors, on child malnutrition (Payne, 1977; Nabarro, 1981; Victora et al., 1986). The proportion of malnourished children within a community is a powerful indicator of the level of access to basic resources from vulnerable groups. High prevalences are the symptoms of a system under stress and they are often associated with scarcity, degradation or mismanagement of available resources, including inequity. According to Jonsson (1984) the main underlying causes of the phenomenon are: insufficient HH food security, inadequate child care, and insufficient basic health care.

The present study was carried out in 1988 as part of programme activities in order to:

  1. describe the main features and constraints of the prevalent farming system in the midland:
  2. identify key determinants of child malnutrition, with particular emphasis on food security and HH economics.

Materials and methods

The study design hinged upon:

The data were collected mainly through:

  1. rapid rural appraisal,
  2. HH questionnaires, and
  3. direct observations.
  1. Rapid rural appraisal techniques were adapted from Conway (1985) and developed in order to analyse livestock productivity, HH economics and market prices in a better way (Ghirotti, 1992). During meetings with farmers, results were interpreted and discussed with the assistance of community workers.
  2. 102 heads of HH, out of the 109 originally selected, were interviewed in four selected villages of the midlands: Telamu, Sedeka, Weinenata and Ferro. Data on age-sex distribution of the interviewed households are in Figure 2. These villages were involved in the programme (JNSP) activities and the sample was drawn from a list of HH's. All the interviews were performed in the local language through a trained interpreter during house-to-house visits. They took place in August, a period which corresponds with the beginning of the new Sidama traditional year and the end of the Ethiopian calendar. It was then easier for the farmer to recall events of the previous year. The methodology was tested in a fifth village (Wondo). The results of this pilot trial were not included in the study.
  3. At the end of each interview, some selected features (e. g., land plot size and conditions, type and quantity of cultivated crops, number and type of livestock owned) were verified utilizing HH conditions, as well as ownership of a functioning radio set and type of bed, as wealth indicators. The previous year's coffee production of each HH was checked at the local Peasant associations (PAs) where the harvest had to be sold.

Further information about the study area and methodology can be obtained from a previous publication (Ghirotti, 1995).

Risks factors in child malnutrition

Ninety eight HHs, in the selected villages, fulfilled the basic criteria for being involved in a case - control study. All of them having a child below three years of age (13-24 months included) with weight for age above 90% of the median of the Harvard reference population (hence well nourished) or with weight for age below 65% of the median of the Harvard reference population (hence severely malnourished). They were divided in two extreme groups in order to identify main determinants of malnutrition. The study was performed as single blind: information on the nutritional status of the children belonging to the interviewed HH were deliberately obtained only at the end of all the interviews in the concerned PA. The two major working hypotheses were:

  1. child malnutrition is associated with the income level of the HH,
  2. it is also associated with the degree of efficiency in land utilization.

At the same time a parallel and integrated investigation analyzed the role of maternal care and mother knowledge/attitude in the same HHs (N. Zagaria, unpublished document).

The income of each HH was estimated by making a calculation of the farm gross output of the year (according to the recorded production parameters), of ownership of goods, livestock and other sources of HH income. Data were computed into a spread-sheet format. Items were converted into monetary figures, i.e. Ethiopian Birr (at the time of the study 1 US$=2.05 E. Birr), according to local market prices.

Income pro capita was calculated by dividing the estimated gross income for the total number of HH members. The coefficient for children below five years was 0. 4, for family members between 5 and 15 years of age was 0. 75 and for members above 15 years was 1.

Efficiency in agricultural production was estimated by dividing the gross income for the size of the land holding (Spedding, 1981). Management was evaluated by comparing the husbandry practices of the two groups (HHs of well-nourished and HHs of malnourished child) to identify differences in their behaviour, if any, associated with production improvement (e. g. ; use of inputs, frequency of weeding and other husbandry practices, level of livestock care, diversification of production strategy, priorities in expenditures).

Data analysis

Data were analysed either comparing means with ANOVA or using chi-squared to test hypotheses. A Mantel - Haenszel stratified analysis was then carried out. The correlation coefficient was calculated to establish eventual relationship between selected variables. P values less than 0. 1 (10%) were considered as statistically significant. A statistical package EPI-INFO was used for the analysis (WHO-CDC, 1990).

Results

The farming system

HH composition and land plot size:
The average HH size is 6.5 persons (S. D. = 2.24). Its composition is given in Figure 2. Polygamy was found in 19 HHs. Three farms were led by a woman. 95.1% of the farmers cultivate less than one hectare of land (see table 1). The average land plot is 0. 4 ha. Its size is not associated with income (P>0. 1). The recorded population density in the area is 525 people/Km2 (see Table 2).

Income: The comparison between the means of the income recorded in HHs of the four villages, showed that the difference is not significant (P>0. 1). It was then assumed that the selected villages are rather homogenous. On-farm activities are the main source of income for 99 HHs (97.1%). Coffee and livestock production largely contribute to family income (over 80%), the former as a source of cash, the latter as an asset. The selling of cash crops (coffee, chat, sugarcane and other fruit) and dairy products provides most of the ready money available, on average 17% of the gross income, to buy farm inputs and to meet other HH expenditures. During the year of the study, 61 (59.8%) farmers worked either for other farmers or for the local producer co-operatives in order to obtain extra cash or, more frequently, food. Income generated from agricultural activities was integrated in 15 HHs (14.7%) with casual labour (e. g., brickwork), in 6 (5.9%) with handicraft production and in 4 HHs (3.9%) with alcohol sale. Income was not associated with the surface of cultivated land nor with the HH size (P>0. 1)

Crop Production: In the midlands, the garden is a combination of different food and cash crop species. The ensete plants form the higher canopy under which humidity is maintained and where coffee, kale (Brassica carinata), yam (Dioscorea abyssinica), sweet potato (Coleus edulis) and other vegetable and fruit trees are planted. The climate, with mild temperatures and water surplus for most of the year, is favourable to crops but also to weed growth. Soil fertility in the garden is kept and even increased by the daily spreading of the manure collected overnight. The floors of traditional housing are constructed in such a way that the urine of livestock kept indoor overnight drains into the garden. However, heaps of unused manure were noticed near some plots as well as land degradation in sloped or grazing areas. Maize is cultivated separately in rows, together with kale, beans and spice plants.

The frequency of the HHs cultivating the most important crops is summarized in table 3. Because of the small size of land plots, the main agricultural tool is a local bamboo hoe. The plough is used only by few farmers who cultivate more than one ha of land.

Ensete plays a central role in the life of Sidama people. It furnishes the main staple food which is potentially available throughout the year, fibre for handicrafts, ropes, leaves for shelter, by-products for animal feed. Preferably when the plant is 6-8 years old, the pseudostem is scraped in order to obtain “bula”, the most valuable food made from the juice, and “wasa”, which is obtained from fermentation of the solid residue and can easily be stored in the ground for over two years. Production per plant is about 30 kg though an eight years old plant can produce up to 40 kg of wasa.

All the farmers interviewed cultivate maize. Teff (Eragrostis teff), wheat and barley are cultivated by a few farmers (in seven, three and two HHs respectively) owning more than 0. 6 ha of land.

Production of coffee, the main cash crop, was not associated with plot size (P>0. 1). Fruits like orange, banana, avocado, guava and papaya have the function of cash crops, diversifying the HH economy and providing some petty cash when other sources are not available, especially for farmers in villages near the major markets and roads.

Because of the low but diversified production through the year, little is stored. Most food is eaten or sold within weeks from harvest, with the exception of was which can be prepared any time during the year.

Only 2.9% of the farmers interviewed use improved maize seeds. Fertilizers, mainly bought from free marketing, are employed by 21.6% of them and their use is associated with high income (P<0. 01). Nineteen (18.6%) farmers obtained information on how to improve their agricultural production, mainly coffee. Figure 3 shows the major constraints in crop production identified by the heads of HH. Among other causes, farmers mentioned the difficulty to obtain loans.

Livestock production: The recorded human/livestock ratios and density, in the study area as well in the whole Sidama and in the rest of Ethiopia, are given in Table 2. In spite of population pressure, livestock density in the area is higher than in the rest of the Awraja and of Ethiopia. On the other hand, the ratio of TLU per HH is lower.

Some 96% of the interviewed heads of HHs own livestock and about 89.2% own cattle (see Table 4). Cattle numbers are a good indicator of wealth, and ownership of more than three heads per HH is associated with an estimated annual income above E. Birr 1,000. In fact, the average herd size in a low income HH is 2.5 cattle, while in a wealthy one it is four cattle (P< 0. 001). The average herd structure is typically milk-calf production oriented (Figure 4). Oxen, as well as equine animals which are used as source of draught power, are owned only by farmers with larger land plots. The recorded production parameters are typical of a rather stable and productive traditional herd (Table 5). Farmers identified the main causes of losses in calves as diarrhoea and emaciation, while in adults poisoning, internal parasitism, clostridiosis and diarrhoea. Offtake comprises essentially sales.

Small ruminants are less diffused than cattle although they are probably more suitable to the local farming conditions (Tables 2 and 4). Animal production in the midlands is indeed milk-oriented and small ruminants cannot fulfil this important demand, especially sheep, because of a well-rooted food taboo. However, once this taboo is neglected, goats are gradually replacing other domestic ruminants. The recorded difference between lambing and kidding rates was significant (P<0. 01). The average flock size is not associated with income or land plot size (P>0. 1). Farmers say that the major causes of death in small ruminants are parasitism and predation. Offtake is in the form of sales. However on special occasions, such as birth of a child, special visits or sickness of a member, small ruminants are slaughtered to be consumed within the HH.

Chicken are bred independently of HH income as well. The mortality rate is quite high (39.2%) and affects mostly chicks. The major causes of death are predation by hawks (86.3%), diseases (12.1%) and accidents (1.6%). The recorded offtake was 22.7%. 3/4 of it was due to consumption by the members of the family.

Each beehive produces 3-3.5kg of honey which is used to produce local hydromel: “teij”. Fifty-nine percent of the cattle owners, regardless of their income, vaccinated their animals against major infectious diseases. In 44% of the herds there was a need for veterinary assistance during the year which, for the great majority, concerned cattle. Only two farmers obtained information on how to improve their livestock production. Of the 40 farmers who needed veterinary care during the reference year, 24 (60%) used traditional medicine, 10 (25%) modern medicine and 6 (15%) both. The choice was not associated with HH income level (P>0. 1). The major constraints in animal husbandry identified by farmers are given in Figure 5. Grazing areas are often limited to open meadow in front of the house and to scarce fallow land. By-products, mainly ensete leaves and maize stover, are given as feed to livestock in the dry season. However, according to farmers, an abundant diet of ensete leaves can cause severe enteritis, notably in young animals. Local coarse grass (Pennisetum scimperi), commonly found in common pastures and rich in silicates, is possibly responsible for early consumption of teeth in livestock.

Market prices: Seasonal dynamics of the price of common agricultural products are given in figures 6 and 7. Prices are higher in villages near the main tarmac road and the Awraja capital, Yerg' Alem (i.e., Weinenata and Ferro).

Food habits: Vegetable products are gradually replacing food of animal origin as maize is gradually replacing wasa in the diet. In families owning cattle, wasa is eaten with milk or butter. The latter food is considered as being very nutritive and used by well off families for weaning their children. Vegetables and fruit, on the other hand, are considered as being of little nutritive value. 45% of the farmers interviewed believe that good nutrition is based on food of animal origin and 28.4% believe that malnutrition is caused by the absence in the diets of such food. These beliefs are probably linked to the traditional pastoral life-style of local ethnic groups. However, 63.7% of the heads of HHs are aware that an unvaried diet is an important cause of malnutrition.

Expenditures: The main expenditures in the HH throughout the year are, in order of priority: food (82.1%), clothes (14.7%), taxes and contributions (2.9%). Priority in expenditure items is not related to the HH income (P>0. 1).

Risk factors in child malnutrition

As shown in Table 7 child malnutrition is strongly associated with an estimated income of less than 1100 E. Birr (P<0. 001). The mean gross income in HHs with a well nourished child is E. Birr 1471 (C. L. 92.9) while in the other group this is E. Birr 893 (C. L. 71.3). This difference is significant (P<0. 001). Income pro capita was not associated with malnutrition (P>0. 1). Moreover, the average size of HHs with a malnourished child was 6.8, while for HHs with well-nourished children it was 6.2. This difference was not significant (P>0. 1). Therefore, larger families are not more vulnerable.

Cattle ownership is a good indicator of wealth and a predictor of the child nutritional status (P<0. 01). Ownership of more that three cattle is associated with high income levels and good nutritional status of the child (respectively P<0. 001 and P<0. 005), see table 8. There is no confounding effect between the two factors. The correlation coefficient between income and herd size is 0. 73.

The association between different house conditions and levels of income, and between house conditions (hence of a income proxy) and malnutrition were both highly significant (P< 0. 001), see table 9. Bed or radio ownership are poor wealth or malnutrition indicators (P<0. 01), may be because of the small sample size.

The combination of number of cattle owned and house condition is an excellent predictor of nutritional risk, with an odd ratio of 15.5.

Malnutrition was not associated with number of wives nor with land plot size (P>0. 1). On the other hand, it was related to lower levels of efficiency in land utilization (Table 10).

No significant difference in agricultural practices or in awareness of nutritional problems was observed between the two groups of HHs.

At the time of the interviews, the gardens belonging to low income farmers presented most of the maize already harvested, hence before its optimal maturation. Ensete plants older than five years were also more frequently found in the garden of wealthy HHs.

Conclusions

Caution is needed while interpreting data obtained from official statistics or questionnaires (see for example, Chambers, 1983 and Gill, 1993). Bearing this in mind, the study, of which the results are consistent with the demographic and productive patterns recorded by broader surveys carried out by the Ministry of Agriculture (1984) and by JNSP, points out that:

  1. The prevalent farming system of the midlands of Sidama is under stress mainly because of burgeoning human population. Symptoms are not only the high proportion of children acutely or chronically affected by malnutrition but also the progressive degradation of resources in an environment once extremely fertile. Land erosion is commonly observed by farmers who consider it a major problem though in some plots nutrients surplus, as unused manure, was observed. Hurni (1988) classified soil erosion in Sidama as medium (20–40%). Pastureland is shrinking and degrading in its botanical composition. Most of the abundant water resources are now polluted.
  2. In order to buffer the progressive crisis, and given the presence of markets for cash crops and dairy products, the mixed system in Sidama midlands is rapidly evolving into specialization. The area is among the richest in Ethiopia (MOA, 1984). Because of their positive role as a source of cash in the HH economy, coffee and chat plants are gradually replacing food crops in the garden such as ensete, yam and maize. Nowadays, food is the main expenditure while in the 1970s it was clothing (Ayele, 1975; Hamer, 1987). The latter author, comparing HH income and expenditure balances between the 1960s and 1970s, points out that a sign of the vulnerability of the Sidama productive system today under stress is the increasing imbalance in favour of expenditures which can only be partially covered by previous years' savings. However, further specialization will reduce the flexibility of the system and make it more vulnerable because of its heavy dependency on remote markets beyond the reach of farmers' control (particularly in the case of coffee).
  3. The situation in Sidama could somehow be considered intermediate between what was observed in the Rwanda highlands (von Braun et al., 1991) and the positive Machakos case, Kenya (English et al., 1992). Nevertheless, Sidama has less marketing opportunities than Machakos and the enrolment rates for primary schools reported from Ethiopia may reduce the possibility of off-farm employment, for local farmers. As stated by von Braun et al. (1991), since rapid population growth contributes significantly to rural poverty, areas under such pressure may build their economic sustainability less and less upon agriculture alone. National land reforms have to be carefully designed and monitored to avoid low income HHs, in order to pay their debts, giving away their plots to well off farmers.
  4. The main underlying factor of malnutrition in children of Sidama is poverty. The parallel study carried out in the same area showed that child care and mother behaviour is not a major determinant of the phenomenon (Zagaria N., personal communication). Although child mortality is higher in poor HHs, when analysing the nutritional status of the siblings of infants included in the study and comparing it with the results of the present investigation, it came out that the protective effect of the family income on children decrease soon after they are weaned. Also wealthy HHs have stunted or underweight older children, though in a lower proportion than poor families (Ghirotti M., Zagaria N. and Tekle E., unpublished results).

A major conclusion of this study is that livestock play a protective role against land degradation and poverty. Such role against poverty and hence child malnutrition is associated with the possibility to diversify HH production and diet. There is no major difference in the skill and knowledge of members from low or high income HH. The main difference lies in the possibility to modulate their production and marketing strategies. High income farmers have a good area of manoeuvre within which they can adapt their decisions according to rapidly changing conditions. On the contrary, in order to cope with their immediate survival needs, low income farmers have to sell products soon after harvest, when prices are low, or consume them before they become ripe and reply on traditionally standardized husbandry techniques developed when pressure on local natural resources was less intense. The latter HHs have limited choices that are reduced every year or in every round of the “spiral of necessity” shown in Figure 8.

Acknowledgements

This paper is dedicated to the Ethiopian field workers, an example of devotion in performing their tasks, and to the memory of: Reginald Bark Griffiths (1920 – 1997), John William Coltrane (1926 – 1967), and Sophie Ali (1954 – 1990).

The study was performed within the field work programme of the “International Course for Primary Health Care Managers at District Level in Developing Country” (Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome), supported by the Italian Technical Cooperation. The author is very grateful to: R. Guerra, course supervisor; E. Tekle, Ethiopian Nutritional Institute, and the staff of the UNICEF/WHO Joint Nutritional Support Programme, Sidama; S. Sanford, ILCA; D. Nabarro; S. Babsa, typist; G. Beccaloni, FAO documentarist; and Zebenay I., interpreter.

References

Ayele G. M. (1975) The Forgotten Aborigines Livestock and Meat Board, Addis Ababa.

Biasiutti R. (1959) Razze e Popoli della Terra, III vol., UTET, Torino.

Brumby P. J. (1986) The International Livestock Centre for Africa: objectives, activities and future International Livestock Centre for Africa, Addis Ababa.

Chambers R. (1983) Rural Development: Putting the Last First. Longman, London.

Conway G. R. (1985) Rapid Rural Appraisal for Agroecosystem Analysis. Aga Khan Foundation (UK), London.

de Leeuw P. N. and Reid R. (1995) Impact of human activities and livestock on the African environment: an attempt to partition the pressure. In: Proceedings of the Joint FAO/ILRI Roundtable on Livestock Development Strategies for Low Income Countries, Addis Ababa, 27 February-2 March 1995, 29–39.

English J. , Tiffen M. and Mortimore M (1993) Land Resource Management in the Machakos District, Kenya 1930–1990. World Bank Environment Paper n. 5. World Bank, Washington D. C. .

Ghirotti M. (1992) Rapid Rural Appraisal Techniques: a tool for planning and managing animal health and production development programmes. In: Proceedings of the Conference of the Society for Veterinary Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Edinburgh: 1–3 April 1992, 190–206.

Ghirotti M. (1995) Farming practices and patterns in coffee-growing midlands of Sidama - Ethiopia Riv. Agr. Subtrop. e Trop., 89, 5–28.

Gill G. J. (1993) O.K., the Data's Lousy, but It's All We've Got (Being a Critique of Conventional Methods). Gatekeeper series n. 38. International Institute for Environment and Development, London.

Hamer J. H. (1987) Humane Development-Participation and change among the Sadama of Ethiopia The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.

Hurni H. (1988) Ecological issues in the creation of famine in Ethiopia, Paper presented at the National Conference on Disaster Prevention and Preparedness Strategy for Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, 5–8 December 1988.

Jahnke H. E. (1982) Livestock Production Systems and Livestock Development in Tropical Africa. Kieler Wissenschaftsverlag, Kiel.

Jonsson O. (1984) Child Survival and Development, a Proposed Conceptual Approach. In: the Programming Workshop for the preparation of the next UNICEF Board Recommendations. Dar es Salaam, 11–15 June 1984.

McEntire J., Bouzat D. and Pingali P. (1992) “Crop- livestock interaction in sub-Saharan Africa” The World Bank, Washington D. C.

Ministry of Agriculture (1984) “General Agriculture Survey, Preliminary Report, 1983/84” Planning and Programming Dpt., Addis Ababa.

Nabarro D. (1981) “Social, economic, health and environmental determinants of nutritional status” Food. nutr. Bull., 6, 38–47.

Payne P. R. (1977) “Socioeconomic cause of malnutrition”. In: Nutrition in Developing Countries, ed. by Korte R., GTZ, Eschborn, 93–114.

Raya A. (1987) “Report of the Diagnostic Survey of Sidama Farming Systems Zone”, Institute of Agriculture Research, Awasa, Ethiopia.

Ruthenberg H. (1980) “Farming Systems in the Tropics” Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Spedding C. W. R. (1981) “An Introduction to Agricultural Systems” Applied Science Pub., London.

Steinfeld H., de Haan C. and Blackburn H. (1997) “Livestock - Environment Interactions: Issues and Options”.

Victora C. G., Vaughan J. P., Kirkwood B. R., Martines J. C. and Barcelos L. B. (1986) “Risk factors for malnutrition in Brazilian children: the role of social and environmental variables”, WHO Bull., 64, 299–309.

Von Braun J., de Haen H. and Blanken J. (1991) “Commercialization of Agriculture under Population Pressure: Effects on Production, Consumption and Nutrition in Rwanda”. Research Report n. 85. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington D. C. .

Westphal E. (1975) “Agricultural Systems in Ethiopia”, PUDOC, Wageningen.

Table 1: Land holding frequency per household in Sidama midlands (n=102)

cultivated land (hectare)frequency
<0. 581
0. 5–117
>12

Table 2: Human and livestock population densities in Ethiopia, Sidama and sampled Midlands (Sources: UN, JNSP and study data)

 EthiopiaSidamaMidlands
Population/Km232.7254.2525*
cattle/people0. 650. 650. 48
small rumin. /people10. 140. 11
equines/people0. 180. 040. 02
TLU/HH**4.152.992.17
cattle/Km221.3165.8252.6
small rumin. /Km232.734.655.4
equines/ Km25.79.18.7
TLU/Km222.6126.6190. 1

* estimate which includes the population of main urban centres

** 1 Household = 6 members

Table 3: frequency of households cultivating major crops (n = 102)

cropsno of HHscropsno. of HHs
ensete102banana69
maize102sugarcane67
coffee100chat65
kale95red pepper65
pumpkin88sweet potatoes47
yam79avocado38
orange73guava11

Table 4: number of households breeding livestock (n = 102)

speciesno of HHstotal number in the sample
cattle91319
goats1842
sheep1728
donkeys1010
horses11
chicken62214
beehives1443
no livestock4---

Table 5: Production rates recorded in cattle of Sidama Midlands (n = 369)

Calving %Mortality %Off take %
calfadult
61.524.22.86.2

Table 6: Production rates in small ruminants of Sidama Midlands (n = 33 + 57)

 BirthMortalityOff take
sheep58.8*012
goats95.4*3.39.6

* P < 0. 01

Table 7: Child nutritional status and estimated household income

 Estimated household income
<1,100 E. birr>1,100 E. birr
Well nourished1740
Malnourished329

P < 0. 001 O. R. =8.37 C. L. =95%

Table 8: Child nutritional status and number of owned cattle (n = 98)

 Owned cattle
0–3>3
Well nourished2730
Malnourished3110

P < 0. 05 O. R. =3.44 C. L. =95%

Table 9: Child nutritional status and productivity per hectare (n = 98)

 E. Birr/0. 1 hectare
Well nourished51.63(+3.9)
Malnourished27.63(+2)

P<0. 001 C. L. =95%

Table 10: House condition and children nutritional status (n = 98)

 house condition
pooraveragegood
well nourished children41538
malnourished children22811

P<0. 001 O. R = 15.34 95% C. L.

Figure 1: Map of Sidama (*=sampled village)

Figure 1

Figure 2: Household age-sex distribution
% of the different age-sex group in the interviewed households, average value

Figure 2

Figure 3: Main problems in crop production

Figure 3

Figure 4: Average herd composition

Figure 4

Figure 5: Main problems in livestock production

Figure 5

Figure 6: Monthly variation of the price for one horse load of ensete

Figure 6

Figure 7: Monthly variation of the price for one qt of coffee or barley in Aleto Wondo

Figure 7

Figure 8: The spiral of necessity

Figure 8

THE INFLUENCE OF GOVERNMENT POLICIES ON LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION AND THE ENVIRONMENT IN WEST ASIA AND NORTH AFRICA (WANA)

PETER ORAM

Research Fellow Emeritus, IFPRI, Washington D. C., USA

Abstract

The paper reviews the dynamics of change in the WANA region over the last forty years, with a particular focus on their impact on agricultural policy, the livestock sector, and the environment in the Mashreq and Maghreb (M&M) countries of the region, for which recent information is available from an ongoing project.

This project, which is supported by the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) and the Arab Fund for Economic and Social Development (AFESD), involves two international research centers - the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and the International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), in close collaboration with national biological and social scientists from those eight countries. 1 Its principal goal is to find ways of reconciling growth, poverty alleviation, and sustainable natural resource management in the low rainfall farming areas of those countries with mean annual precipitation (MAP) below 400 mm, the steppe rangelands with MAP below 200 mm, and the upland watersheds.

These zones which cover a huge area, including a significant share of the arable land, and virtually all of the natural grazings in those countries (Table 1), are at high risk from climatic hazards, and represent the main locus of rural poverty. Livestock, particularly small ruminants, have a pivotal social and economic role in land use, farming systems, and employment there, and are the mainstay of family income and savings from agriculture. Livestock also contribute significantly to the national economies, representing between 30 percent and 35 percent of agricultural GDP in the eight countries.

Nevertheless, their governments, faced with large food and feed imports to meet the needs of rapidly growing populations, have given priority in research and investment policies to the higher rainfall areas, and particularly to the expansion of irrigation. Support to agriculture in the low rainfall areas has been mainly aimed at mitigating the impact on the ruminant livestock sector of the frequent droughts which are endemic to the dominant semi-arid winter rainfall Mediterranean climate there.

These drought relief policies, which have been largely of an ad hoc reactive nature, have created social and economic dependencies among people in the low rainfall areas; which are proving financially costly to governments, and difficult to escape from. Together with broader sector and national policies, they have encouraged escalation of animal numbers and had perverse effects on the natural environment. This paper reviews the factors which have created this situation, and suggests measures to restore sustainable management of livestock based farming systems in these low rainfall environments, while alleviating poverty.

1 Algeria, Libya, Morocco,and Tunisia in the Maghreb, and Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria in the Mashreq region. The author is indebted to Drs. Tidiane Ngaido and Nabil Chaherli. IFPRI-ICARDA Post-Doctoral Fellows, and to the national co-workers from the M&M countries for valuable data cited in this paper.

Demographic change and income growth in WANA over the last fifty years, and their influence on the livestock sector

Since the end of the second world war there have been sweeping social and economic changes in the WANA countries including:

These factors influence livestock and the environment in several ways.

2 Morocco: Aridoculture Baseline Study and Farming Systems Typology: 1993,K. Moore; F. Nassif; A. Sefrioui, and R Riddle

Tunisia: Small Farmers, Potential and Prospects. The World Bank, March 1991

All of the above forces are at work in the M&M countries, as a result of which demand now exceeds domestic production capacity for several important commodities, especially cereals, meat, and milk, generating rising imports to offset declining self-sufficiency per capita. (Tables 4 and 5). Barley imports in 1992-94 were almost double those a decade earlier. Imports of ruminant meat and live animals cost almost 900 million US dollars in 1982-84, a period of severe drought in several countries; for 1992-94, when climatic conditions were more favorable, this fell to 462 million US dollars. Recent projections for WANA as a whole indicate that the region will be the world's largest cereal importer by 2020, with feed grains representing 28 percent of the total requirement; while sheep and goat meat deficits would rise from 0. 34 million m. t. in 1993 to between 0. 67 and 0. 69 million m. t. in 2020. (Rosegrant et al. 1995).

Despite large increases in domestic sheep and goat numbers in several M&M countries with sheep populations increasing by about 26 million (64%) between 1961 and 1991, (Table 5) and rising feed imports, per capita consumption of red meat has gone down, reflecting the inability of the small ruminant sector to meet current demand generated by population and income growth. Had it not been for the rapid expansion of the domestic poultry industry in these countries in the last fifteen years, imports of red meat would have been considerably larger or rising domestic prices would have restrained demand. Despite these developments, levels of dietary animal protein in all WANA countries are still well below the 33 percent considered nutritionally desirable. (Economides 1995).

Closing this dietary gap while maintaining calorie intakes at their present high per capita levels of around 3,000 kcal/day, in the face of a projected population growth to 180 million by 2020 and without degrading the environment, presents a tremendous challenge to governments.

Government interventions to achieve food security and their impact on livestock and the environment

Macroeconomic and sectoral policies

To meet this challenge, and to maintain social stability, government policies in the M&M countries have emphasized import substitution for key food commodities, and have adopted a range of input and output subsidy, exchange rate, tariff protection, price control, credit, and other incentive measures to stimulate domestic food production, as well as investing heavily in irrigation and in research in the higher rainfall areas to intensify and diversify production and increase employment opportunities through value added agriculture-based industries. Until recently most governments also intervened massively to control purchase, marketing, and processing of strategic commodities and of farm inputs, as well as supporting consumers through pricing policies.

Although these sectoral policies were directed primarily to increasing productivity of crops in the higher potential regions rather than in the low rainfall areas, where both the scope for diversification of crop production and the use of yield increasing technology are limited by aridity and high risks of drought, they have, nevertheless, had a negative impact on the environment in those areas in several ways.

Prior to the 1970's there were forty percent fewer sheep in the M&M countries, and they were able to obtain a large share of their sustenance from the natural grazings. However, in the absence of large-scale feed supplementation their numbers fluctuated widely with precipitation, and losses in drought years kept population from rising in good years to a level which seriously degraded the resource. Even in the 1950's, however, concern was being expressed about the state of the rangelands (FAO 1959).

An important consequence of the demand pressures discussed above, combined with price incentives and other government interventions, even when they are not specifically directed either at the low rainfall areas or the livestock sector, has been to create economic and social situations which encourage farmers to keep more and more sheep in those areas (and often for longer periods) than the natural grazings can support. Increasing concentration on one species of the animal population is also detrimental.

3 Nevertheless, Syria has recently taken a bold decision to restrict cultivation in its lowest rainfall ecozone,where MAP is below 250 mm, and is pursuing measures to restore more conservative land use practices, including shrub plantations.

4 Tadros (1989), reports that in a survey of 85 sheep owners in Jordan, 52 percent owned a tractor, 71 percent a truck or pickup, 19 percent a water tanker, and only 18 percent had no wheels; 21 percent were fully nomadic, 23 percent had a home base but no land, 7 percent had land but no home, and 48 percent had both a home and land.

5 From 1992 agricultural exporters are permitted by the Syrian Government to use up to 75 percent of their export earnings to import agricultural trucks. (FAO 1992)

This has had two significant results. First, there has been a progressive decline in the contribution of the rangelands to small ruminant diets and a concomitant increase in flock owners' reliance on other sources of roughage (especially cereal straw and stubbles, and by-products of crops grown in higher rainfall or irrigated lands); and on supplementation with grains and concentrates. (Nordblom et al. 1995). While this is partly a reflection of the substantial increase in the number of animals on a shrinking area of rangelands, it is also widely attributed to resource degradation from overstocking.

Second, the risks of catastrophic losses of animals from disease and drought (particularly the latter) have been greatly enhanced by the escalation of ruminant numbers. Over the years drought has caused grave social, economic, and political problems in the M&M regions, which have affected entire nations. For example the severe 1995 drought in Morocco led to a 40 percent decline in national GDP and the loss of 100 million work days nation-wide (Iovanna 1996).

Nevertheless, it is the agriculture of the low rainfall areas, which are heavily dependent on cereals and small ruminant livestock as the main sources of agricultural income which is the most immediately and devastatingly hit by drought. Livestock are both affected directly through loss of feed and water supply and indirectly by increased vulnerability to disease. For example:

Drought mitigation policies

In an attempt to limit the social and economic damage from drought, governments have instituted a range of measures, beginning in the 1980's, which have tended to become more complex over time. Of all the policies affecting livestock and the environment in the low rainfall areas these are probably the most important, and they will, therefore, be reviewed in some detail here, based on a synthesis of the drought mitigation programs in Jordan, Morocco, Syria and Tunisia. While these vary in detail they have many common features, for example:

6 During the 1978-84 World/Bank-Syrian Government Livestock Development Project, numbers of sheep breeding and range improvement cooperatives rose there from 51 to 256. They proved valuable instruments for credit and sale of feed, which required registration of flocks and paying fees; but were not very effective in imposing range discipline because of lack of authority and vehicles for policing the area and fears of reprisal. (Leybourne 1966).

7 In Morocco, for example, the debt relief component of the 1995 drought mitigation program was 1,650 million dirhams; over three times the cost of the ‘Sauvegarde de Cheptel’ operation for livestock protection (491 million dirhams) which included all feed costs, their transport and distribution, the vaccine program, and a rangeland improvement water points element.

8 250,000 hectares of shrub reserves and about 120,000 hectares of plantations have been established by the government in Syria; (Rae et al., 1996) 280,00 hectares of government range reserves in Jordan, with 23,000 hectares of shrubs at a cost of U.S.1000 per hectare; a large area in Libya; and considerable investment is underway in Morocco and in Tunisia — where a planned target of 800,000 hectares is reported (World Bank 1991).

Conclusions with respect to the impact of government policies on livestock and the environment

  1. Although much of the evidence is anecdotal, the weight of opinion in the literature suggests strongly that at their current high population levels ruminant livestock are having a detrimental impact on the environment in the low rainfall areas, especially on the shrinking area of natural grazings, both through the escalation of their numbers, and through the expansion of mechanized barley cultivation for feed production. Productivity per head of livestock has not increased (although total output of meat and milk has), productivity per hectare both of rangelands and of barley appears to have declined and there has been little technological change.
  2. Governments have been largely instrumental in bringing about these changes, both directly through price supports for livestock and barley and the provision of subsidized feeds (predominantly barley) on an increasing scale; and indirectly through sector and economy-wide import substitution policies and related input, price, interest rate, tariff, and foreign exchange measures to protect domestic food production. These have put heavy pressures on the scarce land and water resources in the more favorable farming areas, which have spilled over to the low rainfall areas.
  3. Government actions to nationalize grazing lands in steppe areas and upland watersheds and to sedentarize nomads have undercut traditional property rights, flock mobility, and conservative livestock management practices in the low rainfall areas, without putting viable systems in their place. This has opened the resources to abuse both from over-stocking and the incursion of cultivation, and is a major deterrent to the adoption of improved technology and investment in their sustainable development. Cheap fuel policies which have encouraged mechanization of barley production, and motorized transportation of flocks, feed, and water have greatly facilitated these developments.
  4. The drought mitigation measures introduced by governments since the mid-1980s, especially the distribution of subsidized feed, have reduced its roller-coaster effect on animal populations, and thus helped to stabilize revenue from livestock, the major source of agricultural income and poverty alleviation in the low rainfall areas. They have also helped preserve the genetic base of the flocks. However, while those appear to be positive results, the programs have encouraged the continuing upward growth of animal populations there, and stabilized numbers at high levels, thus contributing to environmental degradation; and have generated rising feed import, foregone taxes, and other costs, as well as dependencies among the recipients; which are proving an embarrassment to governments. Thus the immediate benefits may have been bought at very high longer-term costs.
  5. Given the untargeted way in which subsidized feed is allocated under these programs, the skewed distribution of the numbers of livestock in relation to their ownership, and the restrictions on credit imposed on small farmers by governments in several countries, the larger farmers appear to have benefitted disproportionally, thus widening income disparities. These inequities must be taken into account in any government decision to modify their current support policies to barley and/or livestock production, desirable though such adjustment may be.

Redressing the balance: priorities for the future management of low rainfall agriculture

  1. Create a permanent institutional base to manage drought.

    There is an urgent need for countries to treat drought as an integral component of the production function rather than as an unpredictable emergency, and to give a high priority to developing national drought management strategies with strong central planning and administrative support; appropriate technical backstopping and predictive capability including early warning and rangeland monitoring systems; and decentralization of planning to the regional and municipal level. Without such an institutional base governments are largely flying blind and policies for dealing with drought will remain ad hoc and reactive.

  2. Increase investment in the development of the low rainfall areas.

    Governments have concentrated investments in infrastructure on the higher rainfall and irrigated areas and have largely neglected the economic and social development of the low rainfall areas. This is a major cause of poverty and high rates of migration from those areas. There is strong evidence (from a recent review of about sixty agricultural projects) that national investment in infrastructure and social services is a key incentive to achieving their financial and environmental objectives - provided that those objectives have been formulated in close participation and agreement with local people and not thrust on them from above. (Oram and de Haan 1996). As well as improving levels of living, health, education and incomes through access to markets, infrastructural investment may also create employment, directly and indirectly, thus helping to stabilize incomes and reduce out-migration; and it may help to sweeten the pill of changes in government policies to reduce the untargeted subsidies and other handouts to which farmers and flock owners have become accustomed. In terms of the foregone opportunities for investment in social infrastructure in the low rainfall areas, the costs of these subsidies appear high; if the damage to the environment could be vectored in they would probably be enormous.

  3. Review national and agricultural policies in terms of their potential impact on the environment.

    Governments still exert a strong influence on food and feed imports, prices, credit, and purchasing, storage and sale of cereals, despite moving towards market liberalization and structural adjustment agreements with the Bretton Woods Institutions in Algeria, Jordan, Morocco, and Tunisia, and some relaxation of government controls in Syria. As part of their review of current macro and sectoral policies, it would be valuable for governments to examine their role in creating intractable problems in the low rainfall areas; especially those which provide perverse incentives to increase small ruminant numbers and mechanized cultivation of rangelands. Success should not be measured in terms of stabilizing maximum numbers of animals on a deteriorating natural resource base by distribution of subsidized feed, but rather by creating conditions which enable fewer but more productive stock to be maintained sustainably through mobility and range-crop-livestock integration.

  4. Encourage participation of the private sector in agricultural development of the low rainfall areas.

  5. Substantially strengthen research on key issues affecting the low rainfall areas.

    Governments have generally accorded low priority to research on the problems of the low rainfall areas, and especially to understanding their socio-economic constraints and examining possible solutions. Tinkering with technology on scattered plots is unlikely to solve many of the problems discussed in this paper.

    It is critical that this lacuna is redressed: there are a number of interesting but controversial approaches to raising productivity and alleviating poverty in those areas while reducing damage to the environment, which cannot be adequately explored without a mix of technological and socio-economic disciplines, including modeling. These include:

    Trade and price issues

    Drought emergency schemes and social issues

    Environmental Issues: Alternatives to barley-barley-barley

    Property Rights Issues

    Monitoring and Evaluation Issues

References

Adary, Adnan. 1996. Drought management in the Jazeera of northern Iraq. Paper Contributing to Mashreq and Maghreb Project. Baghdad, Iraq: IPA Agricultural Research Center.

Blench, Roger. 1995. Baseline survey of socio-economic and animal production data. Report to IFAD. Jordan: National Program for Range Rehabilitation and Development.

Cocks, P. S., E. F. Thomson, K. Somel, and A. Abd El-Moneim. 1980. Degradation and rehabilitation of agricultural land in north Syria. Aleppo, Syrian Arab Republic: International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA).

Boughanmi, Houcine. 1996. Drought Management and Public Policy. Draft report on Tunisia. Contributing to the Mashreq and Maghreb Project. INRA: Settat, Morocco.

Economides, Soterios. 1995. Animal production. In Sustainable range-dependent small ruminant production systems in the Near East Region. Cairo: Regional Office for the Near East, Food and Agriculture Organization.

Food and Agriculture Organization. 1959. Mediterranean Development Project. Main Report. Rome.

Food and Agriculture Organization. 1967. FAO Mediterranean Development Project. Jordan Country Report. Rome.

Food and Agriculture Organization. 1972. FAO Production Yearbook Vol. 26. Rome.

Food and Agriculture Organization. 1978. FAO Production Yearbook Vol. 32. Rome.

Food and Agriculture Organization. 1981. FAO Production Yearbook Vol. 35. Rome.

Food and Agriculture Organization. 1984a. FAO Trade Yearbook Vol. 35. Rome.

Food and Agriculture Organization. 1984b. FAO Production Yearbook Vol. 38. Rome.

Food and Agriculture Organization. 1988. FAO Production Yearbook Vol. 42. Rome.

Food and Agriculture Organization. 1990. FAO Production Yearbook Vol. 44. Rome.

Food and Agriculture Organization. 1995. FAO Production Yearbook Vol. 49. Rome.

Food and Agriculture Organization. 1994. FAO Trade Yearbook Vol. 48. Rome.

Iovanna, Richard. 1996. Sustainable drought management in Morocco. Report prepared for the World Bank Personal Communication.

Laamari, Abdelah, Mohamed El Mourid, and Nabil Chaherli. 1997. Secheresse et Interventions d l'Etat. Draft Report. Contributing to the Mashreq and Meghreb Project. INRA: Settat, Morocco.

Leybourne, Marina. 1993. Links between the steppe and cultivated areas through migration. Dipl^me de Rechereche. No: 78. Geneva: L'Institut Universitaire d'Etudes Du Developpement.

Musgrave, W. F. 1990. Rural adjustment. In Agriculture in the Australian Economy, ed. D. B. Williams. Sydney: University Press.

Nordblom, Thomas L., A. V. Goodchild, and Farouk Shomo. 1995. Working Paper prepared for the Joint FAO/ILRI Roundtable on Livestock Development Strategies for Low Income Countries, March 1995. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Oram, Peter A. and Cornelis de Haan. 1995. Technologies for rainfed agriculture in Mediterranean climates: A review of World Bank experiences. World Bank Technical Paper Number 300. Washington, D. C. : World Bank.

Salem, Mahmoud and Rasmi Sweiti. 1996. Review of past and recent government drought relief programs. Jordan. Paper contributing to the Mashreq and Meghreb Project. NCARTT: Jordan.

Shideed, Kamil. 1996. The impact of price support policies on cereal production in Iraq. Report contributing to the Mashreq and Maghreb Project. INRA: Settat, Morocco.

Stroebel, M. 1996. Macro-economic prospects of small ruminant production in Jordan. Seminar on Livestock Production. Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan and Deutsche Gesellschaft Fuer Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GMBH. Amman.

Tadros, Kamal. 1993. Grazing management in Jordan. Proceedings of the ICARDA Grazing Management Workshop, November 1993. Amman, Jordan: ICARDA.

U.S.Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service. 1985. Syria: Grain and feed. Washington, D. C.

World Bank. 1991. Tunisia: Small farmers potential and prospects. A technical study. Washington, D. C.

World Bank. 1992. Development and the environment. World Development Report. Washington, D. C.

World Bank. 1995. Rangelands development in arid and semi-arid areas: Strategies and Policies. North Africa and Iran Main Report. Washington, D. C.

World Bank. 1996. From plan to market. World Bank Development Report. Washington, D. C.

TABLE 1. LAND USE IN THE MASHREQ AND MAGHREB COUNTRIES, 1991, AND CHANGES SINCE 1970

 Area (000 ha)Percent change in area, 1970–91
Total LandCultivated AreaPermanent PastureForest & WoodlandOther LandCultivated LandPermanent PastureForest & WoodlandOther Land
Iraq43,7375,4504,0001,88032,4079.100. 1-0. 1
Jordan8,893402791707,63024.106.61.2
Lebanon1,0233061080627-6.10-15.85.7
Syria18,3925,6257,7507304,287-4.72.655.0-5.4
Mashreq Region72,04511,78312,5512,76044,951-6.07.67.9-2.0
Algeria238,1747,65331,0004,050195,47111.6-17.967.12.3
Libya175,9542,16013,300695159,7996.620. 930. 4-1.6
Morocco44,6309,42020,9009,0505,26026.067.275.30-73.0
Tunisia15,5364,8754,3356685,6588.770. 014.4-28.6
Maghreb Region474,29424,10869,53514,463366,18815.69.066.2-3.9

Source: FAO Production Yearbooks, Vol. 26, 1972 and Vol. 49, 1995.

TABLE 2. POPULATION DYNAMICS: M & M COUNTRIES 1960 – 1995

YearTotal PopulationAgricultural Pop'n% Share Ag: Total
MashreqMaghrebMashreqMaghrebMashreqMaghreb
000's000's000's000's%%
196015,31128,3788,03417,53452.461.8
197020,38235,9818,74520,06742.955.8
198026,55647,5497,37520,40727.842.9
199036,25261,8947,69419,94825.232.2
199542,30269,2707,83019,92618.528.8
M & M Regional Totals
196043,689 25,568 58.5 
1995111,572 27,756 24.9 

Source: FAO Production Yearbooks: 1972, Tables 3 and 5; 1981, Table 3; 1995, Table 3. Eight countries.

TABLE 3: CHANGES IN AREAS OF KEY CROPS IN M&M REGION, 1969–71 TO 1989–91 (000 HA)

 BarleyWheatPulseTotal ArablePermanent CropsArable + Perm. Crops
Iraq796122-2940155456
Jordan23-108-22225678
Lebanon4-205-245-19
Syria1,62559-16-771495-276
Mashreq region2,44853-62-372611239
Algeria527-58126798-1797
Libya873268350133
Morocco332578541,7501911,951
Tunisia27013723-345737392
Maghreb region1,2161021092,2869773,273
M&M Aggregate region:3,664155471,9141,5883,512

Total arable includes other crops (summer cereals, roots, sugar, oilseeds, vegetables, cotton, etc. ).

Sources: FAO Production Yearbooks, Vol. 35, 1981; Vol. 46, 1992.

TABLE 4. BARLEY: IMPORTS AND EXPORTS FROM THE MASHREQ AND MAGHREB REGIONS 1982–84, 1986–88, 1992–94 AND PERCENT TOTAL CEREAL IMPORTS 1992–94

CountryImports 1982–84 MTExports 1982–84 MTImports 1986–88 MTExports 1986–88 MTImports 1992–94 MTExports 1992–94 MTImports 1992–84 000$Exports 1992–84 000$Total Imports 1992–84 Mill MTAll Cereals 1992–84 Mill US$
Iraq311,667--136,66699,43690,000--9,800--4,006699
Jordan88,845--118,770--416,113--42,726--846140
Lebanon19,410--24,330--45,000--3,733--51976
Syria99,791204,21611,59059,05327,386132,0001,93037,5001,120151
Total Mashreq519,713204,216291,356158,489578,499132,00058,18937,5006,4911,066
Algeria484,009--205,380--426,796--71,399--4,868687
Libya169,308--566,661--958,333--95,833--1,549239
Morocco96,843--2,78087,873387,2135,95038,7211,5931,830200
Tunisia24,185--219,220--136,89028,14613,6893,3731,532194
Total Maghreb774,345--994,04187,8731,909,23234,096219,6424,96697791,320
Total M&M1,294,058204,2161,285,397246,3622,487,731166,096277,83142,46616,2702,386

Source: FAO Trade Yearbooks

TABLE 5. TRADE IN MEAT AND LIVE RUMINANT ANIMALS: MASHREQ AND MAGHREB COUNTRIES: 1982/84–1992/941
CountryYearMeat, Fresh & Frozen: ImportsLive Animals: ImportsLive Exports Sheep
CattleSheepCattleSheepSheep
Metric tonsUS$(000)Metric tonsUS$(000)HeadUS$(000)HeadUS$(000)HeadUS$(000)
Iraq1982–8470,000134,00018,66634,33310,33311,833383,33323,333C--
1992–9418,66629,833233233CCCC2,566160
Jordan1982–849,03224,03712,31635,0393,6302,575527,40532,242258,76713,285
1992–9420,39227,14916,95136,36519,43013,065585,85025,059583,97018,551
Lebanon1982–8416,00033,0005,96611,767103,33341,000340,00024,3336,666533
1992–947,90012,900183467109,33357,333426,37049,15065,0004,633
Syria1982–84CC5,16812,1145,3163,678134,6849,920183,50022,415
1992–94CC1,4791,1006,6273,8751,200,6208,1491,145,06391,572
Mashreq Region82–8495,032191,03742,11693,253122,61259,0861,385,42289,828448,93336,233
Total92–9446,95869,88218,84638,165135,39074,2732,212,84082,3581,796,599114,916
Algeria1982–8417,43229,37613,20439,536CC3,126213CC
1992–9420,23831,29231465111,29213,602101,9505,039CC
Libya1982–8414,31131,7743,82313,970156,405119,5452,210,772167,091CC
1992–943,80011,733331986126,66661,10012,00017,267CC
Morocco1982–844,4974,98352514,62411,768CCCC
1992–945,4737,5838701,26521,80323,745CC3612
Tunisia1982–8413,25814,7035461,33359,30229,61833,8591,6351,666300
1992–9410,04316,6825381,1366,0255,27610031CC
Maghreb Region1982–8449,49880,83617,57854,864230,331160,4812,247,757168,9391,666300
Total1992–9439,55467,2952,0534,038165,786103,723114,05022,3373612
Mashreq-Maghreb1982–84144,530271,87359,694148,117352,943219,5673,633,179258,767450,59936,533
Totals1992–9486,512137,17720,89942,203301,176177,9962,326,890104,6951,796,635114,928

1 There were no significant exports of meat or live cattle. Source: FAO Trade Yearbooks: Vol. 1984, Vol. 199

TABLE 6. SHEEP PRODUCTION: M&M REGIONS 1961–65 TO 1993–95 (000 HEAD)

Country1961–651969–711979–811989–911993–95INDEX 1965–95 (1965=100)
Algeria4,6347,94013,11117,30218,169392
Libya1,3782,1255,0465,1004,766346
Morocco10,95717,08715,22813,52814,119129
Tunisia8,2555,1674,6515,9357,27088
Total Maghreb25,22432,31938,03641,86544,324176
Iraq10,13812,00010,3997,8046,15761
Jordan7527369501,6602,067275
Lebanon200233137222377188
Syria4,0355,8669,31114,57111,068274
Total Mashreq15,12518,83520,79724,25719,669130
Total M&M40,34951,15458,83366,12263,993158

Source: FAO Production Yearbooks: Vol. 26,1972; Vol. 32, 1978; Vol. 44, 1990; Vol. 49, 1995.

TABLE 7. BASIC SOCIO-ECONOMIC INDICATORS M&M COUNTRIES1

CountryPopulation 1994Population Growth 1995–2020GNP per capita 1994GDP 1994Agriculture as % of GDP 1994Agricultural Growth Per AnnumCereal ImportsIncrease
1980–901990–94197419901974–1990
 000s% per annumUS$Mill US$%%%000 MT000 MT1974 = 100
Algeria27,3251.851,65041,941124.5-0. 21,8165,185285
Libya5,2253.05NNNNN6122,290374
Morocco26,4881.431,14030,803216.7-1.58911,578177
Tunisia8,7331.451,79015,770152.80.53071,439469
Iraq19,9252.60NNNNN8702,834326
Jordan4,0232.901,2406,10584.713.21711,491872
Lebanon2,9151.35NNNN 3543560.5
Syria14,1712.201,00014,730282-0.6N3392,0916.7
Sources:FAO Production Yearbook Vol 49, 1995; Population.
Population Projections.U.N.Medium Variant World Population Prospects: the 1996 Revision.
FAO Trade Yearbook Vol 8, 1994: Cereal Imports.
World Bank: World Develop Reports 1992 and 1984: GNP,GDP, Agricultural Growth.

TABLE 8. SHARE OF ARABLE AREA OCCUPIED BY MAJOR CROPS: MOROCCO AND SYRIA 1989/90

 MOROCCO 1989SYRIA 1989
EcozonesSub-humid >400 mmSemi-arid 300–400Arid 200–300Mountain VariableTotal No. Reporting %Sub-humid >350mmSemi-arid 1 250–350Semi-arid 2 250Marginal 200–250SteppeTotal No. Reporting
Crops             
 %%%%N%%%%%%N%
Barley7696831009018795.099.0100.0100.0100.077099.2
Wheat998442747377292.071.345.335.441.745658.8
Grain legumes67391262892881.076.37.84.42.121828.2
Forage legumes1160.5048523.014.710.62.7--9211.8
Maize24610022021--------------
Oilseeds9000202--------------
Vegetables942042425.08.52.5----547.0
Other annuals (melons etc.)658062657.023.23.70.9--13016.8
Fruit trees & Olives3659471611645026.111.90.9--14618.8
Fallow282928443103022.047.849.433.629.223441.8
Total Farmers in each zone224379368611032      776 

Source: Morocco - Oram et.al.1994; Syria - Oram and Hojjati 1995. Based on analysis at IFPRI of farm surveys supervised by Nabil Khaldi.

FIGURE 1. AREA AND YIELD OF BARLEY:SYRIA 1961–1994

FIGURE 1

Previous Page Top of Page Next Page