Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


PART 3 - MONOGRAPHS (Continued)

EUROPEAN PILCHARD

Sardina pilchardus 1,21(05)064,01

Yield

Fillet Edible Flesh Comments Source
 60.4Spain: 16 batches of fish: caught October to June (total of 131 fish): probably includes skin1
 61.0Portugal: probably includes skin2
 64.2Mediterranean) coasts of Spain: 
 62.1Atlantic ) may include skin8

Selected values

Skinless fillets [50%]
Edible flesh 62%

Value for skinless fillets is taken from the data on Japanese pilchard and other Sardinops spp. Edible flesh value is a simple mean.

Composition

Protein Fat Comments Source
 15.9
2.5
1.4
November
January
March    ý  Adriatic Sea: 900 fish analysed in batches of about 50 fish
3
20.05.8Spain: 16 batches, caught October to June (total of 131 fish): probably includes skin1
19.832.06–19.84Tunisia: monthly batches over full 
 mean 10.24year: protein calculated by difference4
17.55–21.340.52–11.77North-east Spain: means of 64 lots over 
mean 19.805mean 5.9053 full years (each lot of up to 40 fish): includes skin5
18.411.4South-west England: sampled over 31/2 years: includes skin and bones6
27.3
24
24.9
2
8.6
5.8
Spring
Summer/Autumn
Winter                ý  Portugal: probably includes skin
2
 5.1–12.0Adriatic Sea: sampled over 6 months: 
 mean 8.7includes skin and bones7
 10.99Mediterranean ) coasts of Spain: sampled 
 11.05Atlantic        ) over complete year: may include skin8
19.385.19Gulf of Naples: single sample9
20.28.9 10

Selected values

Protein 20.0%
Fat 8.1%

Values are based on simple means of data after excluding 4 sets of data: sources 6 and 7 are excluded as they include bone, source 9 as it is a single sample, and source 2 as the protein values appear unrealistically high.

Sources

  1. Gimenez, J.C. and de las Heras, A.R. Composition and energy value of some fish eaten in Madrid. Trabajos del Instituto Español de Oceanografia No 17 (1943)

  2. Goncalves Ferreira, F.A. Composition and food value of some species of fish. Boletim da Pesca 8 (No 33) 89–102 (1951)

  3. Viviani, R. et al. First observations on seasonal changes of the lipids in the tissues of some Adriatic clupeids. Rivista Italiana delle Sostanze Grasse 45 779–790 (1968)

  4. Abdelmouleh, A., Ktari, M.H. and Hadj Ali Salem, M. Seasonal variations in the overall chemical composition of the sardine, Sardina pilchardus (Walbaum, 1792) from the Bizerta (Tunisia) region. Bull.Inst.Natn.Scient.Tech.Oceanogr.Peche, Salammbo 7 91–101 (1980)

  5. Herrera, J. and Munoz, F. Biological aspects of the chemical composition of the sardine (Sardina pilchardus Walb.) from Castellon. Investigaciones Pesqueras 7 33–48 (1957)

  6. Hickling, C.F. The seasonal cycle in the Cornish pilchard, Sardina pilchardus Walbaum. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 26 115–138 (1945)

  7. Lisac, H. Variations in the fat content of Adriatic sardines during 1961. Proceedings and Technical Papers, General Fisheries Council for the Mediterranean 7 237–239 (1963)

  8. Instituto Espanol de Oceanografia. Seasonal variations in the chemical composition of the Mediterranean and Atlantic sardine. Proceedings and Technical Papers, General Fisheries Council for the Mediterranean 6 175–182 (1961)

  9. Carteni, A. and Aloj, G. Chemical composition of marine animals of the Gulf of Naples. Quaderni della Nutrizione 1 49–63 (1934)

  10. Bykov, V.P. Marine Fishes (Russian Translation Series 7, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1985) p 85

EUROPEAN PLAICE

Pleuronectes platessa 1,83(02)004,05
GREENLAND HALIBUT
Reinhardtius hippoglossoides 1,83(02)005,01
AMERICAN PLAICE
Hippoglossoides platessoides 1,83(02)014,01
YELLOWFIN SOLE
Limanda aspera 1,83(02)024,02

These four species in the family Pleuronectidae come within the scope of the study. Data, especially on yields, are lacking for most of these, so data on other Pleuronectidae have been collected below.

Yield

FilletEdible FleshCommentsSource
 61.8Hippoglossus stenolepis: includes skin1
28.034.0Pleuronectes platessa: based on gutted weight: edible flesh by deboning machine6
35.0 Pleuronectes platessa: based on gutted weight7
44.0 Pleuronectes platessa: based on gutted weight: mean of 18 fish2
 54.7Platessa (= Pleuronectes) platessa: skinless1
 49.4Hippoglossoides elassodon: includes skin1
34.050.0Limanda ferruginea: skinless fillets: edible flesh by deboning machine12
 51.4Limanda ferruginea: includes skin13
 44.0Limanda limanda: probably skinless1
42.0 Microstomus kitt: based on gutted weight7
27.051.5Microstomus pacificus: edible flesh by deboning machine15
 42.9Platichthys stellatus: by deboning machine17
24.9 Spring) Pseudopleuronectes americanus: 
48.0 Summer) means of 6 fish each18
 60.2Parophrys vetulus: by deboning machine17
33.046.5Parophrys vetulus: by deboning machine15
28.2 mean of 240 fish of 9 spp of Pleuronectidae20
40.3 mean of 18 fish of 3 spp of Pleuronectidae21
29.1 mean of 47 fish of 4 spp of Pleuronectidae22
 49.5mean yield, with skin, of 9 spp of Pleuronectidae23

Selected values

Skinless fillets 34%
Edible flesh 49%

There is a considerable range of values for yields, even within one species (source 18). No surveys appear to have been carried out. The selected values are means of all the data, after correcting for skin by subtracting 5%, or after converting to a round fish basis, using data of source 25.

Composition

ProteinFatCommentsSource
18.02.0Hippoglossus hippoglossus1
18.45.0Hippoglossus vulgaris (= hippoglossus): means of 3 or 4 fish2
20.11.22Hippoglossus stenolepis: means of 19 or 21 fish3
 2.33Hippoglossus stenolepis: mean of 18 fish4
21.20.8Hippoglossus stenolepis (probably): means of 27 fish5
17.380.98Pleuronectes platessa: means of 40 fish8
16.82.4Pleuronectes platessa: means of 2–6 fish2
11.94–19.94
mean 16.66
0.49–4.21
mean 1.42
Pleuronectes platessa: means of 182 fish over complete year24
12.816.1Reinhardtius hippoglossoides1
13.111.3Reinhardtius hippoglossoides9
16.06.2Pleuronectes (= Glyptocephalus) cynoglossus: means of up to 7 fish2
15.52.7Hippoglossoides platessoides1
15.310.55Hippoglossoides platessoides10
15.62.4Hippoglossoides elassodon1
19.71.2Hippoglossoides elassodon11
17.01.3Limanda aspera11
15.01.1Limanda aspera1
 1.7Limanda ferruginea14
17.01.94Limanda ferruginea13
22.30.37Limanda ferruginea: means of 19 or 20 fish3
15.50.8Pleuronectes(= Limanda) limanda: means of 3 fish2
 1.3Limanda punctatissima14
19.21.3Lepidopsetta bilineata11
17.42.2Pleuronectes microcephalus (= Microstomus kitt): means of up to 5 fish2
14.70.81Microstomus pacificus: means of single batch of 100 fish16
16.80.3Pleuronectes(= Platichthys) flesus: 1 fish2
18.50.53Pseudopleuronectes americanus: means of 6 fish18
19.90.3Pseudopleuronectes americanus: means of 5fish19
18.51.8Parophrys vetulus11
16.11.40Parophrys vetulus: means of single batch of 125 fish16
18.81.41Eopsetta jordani: means of single batch of 160 fish16
17.11.1means of 240 fish of 9 spp. of Pleuronectidae20
18.71.1means of 18 fish of 3 spp.21
17.60.13means of 47 fish of 4 spp. of Pleuronectidae22
16.93.5means of 14 spp. of Pleuronectidae23

Selected values

a) for Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides)

Protein[13.0%]
Fat[13.7%]

b) other Pleuronectidae

Protein17.6%
Fat1.6%

Separate, provisional, values have been selected for Greenland halibut, since both analyses listed above would indicate that this species has a higher fat content and lower protein content than the other Pleuronectidae. This species is known to respond to processing in a variable way.

Of the other species, only one survey has been found (source 24), for European plaice. The selected values are the means of all the data, excluding Greenland halibut.

Sources

  1. Bykov, V.P. Marine Fishes. (Russian Translation Series 7, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1985) pp 177–191

  2. Reay, G.A., Cutting, C.L. and Shewan, J.M. The nation's food VI. Fish as food. II. The chemical composition of fish. J. Soc. Chem. Ind. 62 77–85 (1943)

  3. Sidwell, V.D., Bonnet, J.C. and Zook, E.G. Chemical and nutritive values of several fresh and canned finfish, crustaceans, and mollusks. Part 1: Proximate composition, calcium and phosphorus. Mar. Fish. Rev. 35 (12) 16–19 (1973)

  4. Bonnet, J.C., Sidwell, V.D. and Zook, E.G. Chemical and nutritive values of several fresh and canned finfish, crustaceans, and mollusks. Part II. Fatty acid composition. Mar. Fish. Rev 36 (2) 8–14 (1974)

  5. Thurston, C.E. and MacMaster, P.P. Variations in chemical composition of different parts of halibut flesh. Food Res. 25229–236 (1960)

  6. Ravichander, N. and Keay, J.N. The production and properties of minced fish from several commercially important species. Conference Proceedings: The production and utilization of mechanically recovered fish flesh (minced fish). ed. Keay, J.N. (Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, UK, 1976) pp 18–24

  7. Private communication. UK Industry

  8. Lang, K. and Christen, U. The composition of the muscle meat of a number of sea fish of nutritional importance. Fleischwirtsch. 63 967–970 (1983)

  9. Hjarde, A.W. et al. Food value of some Greenland foods. Nordisk. Medicin 48 1231–1235 (1952)

  10. Templeman, W. and Andrews, G.L. Jellied condition in the American plaice Hippoglossoides platessoides (Fabricius). J. Fish. Res. Bd Canada 13 147–182 (1956)

  11. Anon. Nutrition and composition. Comm. Fish. Rev. 12 (6) 10 (1950)

  12. King, F.J. and Carver, J.H. How to use nearly all the ocean's food. Oak Brook Seminar. Mechanical recovery and utilization of fish flesh. Ed. Martin, R.E. (National Fisheries Institute, Washington DC, 1982) pp 222 238

  13. Dvinin, Uu. F. Dimensions, weight and chemical composition of yellowtail flounder. Ryb. Khoz. No 12, 58 (1982)

  14. Takahashi, K. et al. Characterization of molecular species of fish muscle phosphatidylcholine. Bull. Jap. Soc. Sci. Fish. 51 1475–1486 (1985)

  15. Crawford, D. L., Law, D.K. and Babbitt, J.K. Yield and acceptability of machine separated minced flesh from some marine food fish. J. Fd Sci. 37 551–553 (1972)

  16. Gordon, D.T. and Roberts, G.L. Mineral and proximate composition of Pacific coast fish. J. Agric. Fd Chem. 25 1262–1268 (1977)

  17. Miyauchi, D. and Steinberg, M. Machine separation of edible flesh from fish. Fishery Ind. Res. 6 (4) 165–171 (1970)

  18. Wangler, J.G. Seasonal variations of physical characteristics and chemical composition of fish from middle Atlantic states. Comm. Fish. Rev. 22 (7) 17–20 (1960)

  19. Ousterhout, L.E. Technical Note No 56 - Chemical composition and laboratory fillet yield of 13 species of middle and south Atlantic fish. Comm. Fish. Rev. 22 (7) 15–16 (1960)

  20. Thurston, C.E. Proximate composition of nine species of sole and flounder. J. Agric. Fd Chem. 9 313–316 (1961)

  21. Vlieg, P. Proximate analysis of commercial New Zealand fish species - 3. Technology Research1 181–185 (1985)

  22. Brooke, R.O., Ravesi, E.M. and Steinberg, M.A. The composition of commercially important fish taken from New England waters. II. Proximate analyses of butterfish, flounder, pollock, and hake, and their seasonal variation. J. Fd Sci. 27 73–76 (1962)

  23. Kizevetter, I.V. Technological and chemical characteristics of commercial fish of the Pacific Ocean basin. (TNIRO, Vladivostok, 1971) pp 266–276

  24. McLay, R., Howgate, P.F. and Morrison, J. Nitrogen content of seven British commercial species of fish. J. Assoc. Publ. Anal. 24 131–139 (1986)

  25. Bedford, B.C., Woolner, L.E. and Jones, B.W. Length-weight relationships for commercial fish species and conversion factors for various presentations. Fisheries Research Data Report No 10. (Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, UK, 1986)

EUROPEAN SPRAT

Sprattus sprattus 1,21(05)066,01

Also included, because of lack of separate information, is:

BLACK SEA SPRAT

Clupeonella delicatula 1,21(05)059,01
(= cultriventris) 

Yield

Fillet Edible Flesh Comments Source
 80.7Clupea (=Sprattus) sprattus: Spain: probably includes skin and bones: 2 batches at different times1
 78.0Sprattus sprattus balticus: Baltic: includes skin, bones and fins2
 55.6Sprattus sprattus phalericus: Black Sea: flesh only: 4 batches at different times3
 74.0Sprattus sprattus: UK: flesh and skin (probably bones also): one lot4

Selected values

Skinless fillet [50%]
Edible flesh [56%]

The available data are inadequate. The selected value for skinless fillet yield is taken from Japanese Pilchard and other Sardinops spp. The value for total edible flesh is the value from source 3: other data may include skin, bone and fins. The value is consistent with those for other clupeoids.

Composition
Protein Fat Comments Source
16.616.1Clupea (= Sprattus) sprattus: Spain: probably includes skin and bone: 2 batches at different times1
13.89.9Sprattus sprattus balticus: whole fish analysed at 4 seasons2
14.313.8Sprattus sprattus phalericus: Black Sea: probably whole fish or gutted, headed fish: 4 batches at different times3
17.114.5Sprattus sprattus: UK: flesh only: one lot4
 5.3–10.1Sprattus sprattus: Baltic: fillets (with skin?) analysed: range over year5
 11.5–18.0Sprattus sprattus: UK: whole fish: sampled over 5 months6
 2.0Clupea (= Sprattus) sprattus: Adriatic: fillet: mean of 2 samples7
16.810.5Sprattus sprattus: Norway: whole fish8
15.8–17.36.3–16.8Sprattus balticus: Baltic: whole fish: 
mean 6.7mean 11.3sampled monthly over complete year9

Selected values

Protein [17.1%]
Fat [8.1%]

Most of the available data are for whole fish or edible parts that include bone. Of the remaining sets of data only one, source 4, has a protein measurement and relates to a single sample. It is taken as the selected value, with great reservations. Three sets of data, sources 4, 5, and 7, give fat contents of skinless or skin-on fillets. The selected value is the mean of these, but again is of limited validity because of the inadequate seasonal coverage.

Sources

  1. de las Heras, R. and Mendez Isla, M.C. Contribution to the chemical study of Spanish fish. Anales de Bromatologia 4 403–410 (1952)

  2. Bykov, V.P. Marine Fishes. (Russian Translation Series 7, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1985) p 86

  3. Skachkov, V.P. and Yudina, O.P. Black Sea sprat products manufacture. Ryb. Khoz. No 10, 74–76 (1975)

  4. Plimmer, R.H.A. Analyses and Energy Values of Foods (HMSO, London, 1921)

  5. Podeszewski, Z. and Stodolnik, L. Lipids in commercial Baltic sea fish. VII. Changes in the lipid faction during an annual cycle. Bromat.i Chem. Toksykol. 9 341–347 (1976)

  6. Hardy, R. and Mackie, P. Seasonal variation in some of the lipid components of sprats (Sprattus sprattus). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 20 193–198 (1969)

  7. Viviani, R. et al. First observations on seasonal changes of the lipids in the tissues of some Adriatic clupeids. Rivista Ital. d. Sostanze Grasse 45 779–789 (1968)

  8. Taarland, T. et al. Nutritional values and vitamins of Norwegian fish and fish products. Tidsskr. Hermetikind. 44 405–412 (1958)

  9. Krassowska, T., Nagiello, K. and Lewczuk, Z. Fat content of the Baltic sprat. Przemysl Spozywczy 23 340–341 (1969)

HADDOCK

Melanogrammus aeglefinus 1,48(04)010,01

Yield

Fillet Edible Flesh Comments Source
4057% of gutted, head-on weight1
3852% of gutted, head-on weight2
42 % of gutted, head-on weight3
41 % of gutted, head-on weight4
 50.6% of whole weight5

Selected values

Skinless fillets 35%
Edible flesh 48%

After correcting the data from sources 1 to 4 to a whole weight basis, using a factor from source 6, all data were averaged to give the selected values.

Composition

Protein Fat Comments Source
15.5–20.2
mean 18.8
0.05–1.3
mean 0.17
USA: 42 fish analysed over a year7
18.60.13USA: 9 samples throughout the year8
15.75–20.69
mean 18.51
 UK: 361 fish analysed over 2 complete years9
17.20.2 5
14.6–20.30.1–0.6UK: 29 to 44 samples3
16.7–22.6
mean 20.4
0.03–0.23
mean 0.11
USA: 20 samples10
19.70.3Norway11
19.580.12USA: 2 lots12
17.7 USA: several samples13

Selected values

Protein 18.6%
Fat 0.2%

The selected values are means of data from surveys covering all or most of the year (sources 7, 8 and 9).

Sources

  1. King, F.J. and Carver, J.H. How to use nearly all the ocean's food. Oak Brook Seminar: Mechanical recovery and utilization of fish flesh. ed. Martin, R.E. (National Fisheries Institute, Washington, DC, 1972) pp 222–238

  2. Ravichander, N. and Keay, J.N. The production and properties of minced fish from several commercially important species. Conference Proceedings: The production and utilization of mechanically recovered fish flesh (minced fish). ed. Keay, J.N. (Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, UK, 1976) pp 18–24

  3. Reay, G.A., Cutting, C.L. and Shewan, J.M. The nation's food. VI Fish as food. II. The chemical composition of fish. J. Soc. Chem. Ind. 62 77–85 (1943)

  4. Private communication, UK industry

  5. Bykov, V.P. Marine Fishes. (Russian Translation Series 7, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1985) pp 114–116

  6. Bedford, B.C., Woolner, L.E. and Jones, B.W. Length-weight relationships for commercial fish species and conversion factors for various presentations. Fisheries Research Data Report No 10 (Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, UK, 1986)

  7. Sohn, B.I., Carver, J.H. and Mangan, G.F. Composition of commercially-important fish from New England waters. Part 1 - Proximate analyses of cod, haddock, Atlantic ocean perch, butterfish and mackerel. Comm. Fish. Rev. 23(2) 7–10 (1961)

  8. Crooks, G.C. and Ritchie, W.S. Seasonal variation in chemical composition of common haddock. Food Res. 4 159–172 (1939)

  9. McLay, R., Howgate, P.F. and Morrison, J. Nitrogen content of seven British commercial species of fish. J. Assoc. Publ. Anal. 24 131–139 (1986)

  10. Sidwell, V.D., Bonnet, J.C. and Zook, E.G. Chemical and nutritive values of several fresh and canned finfish, crustaceans and mollusks. Part 1: Proximate composition, calcium and phosphorus. Mar. Fish. Rev. 35(12) 16–19 (1973)

  11. Taarland, T. et al. Nutritional values and vitamins of Norwegian fish and fish products. Tidsskr. Hermetikind. 44 405–412 (1958)

  12. Clark, E.D. and Almy, L.H. A chemical study of food fishes. The analysis of twenty common food fishes with especial reference to a seasonal variation in composition. J. Biol. Chem. 33 483–498 (1918)

  13. Teeri, A.E., Loughlin, M.E. and Josselyn, D. Nutritive value of fish. I. Nicotinic acid, riboflavin, vitamin B12 and amino acids of various salt water species. Food Res. 22 145–150 (1957)

HAIRTAILS, CUTLASSFISHES

Trichiuridae 1,74(04)xxx,xx

Insufficient data has appeared on largehead hairtail (Trichiurus lepturus) to allow separate treatment. Very little has been found on snoek (Thyrsites atun), belonging to the related family, Gempylidae. This monograph, therefore, relates to the following species or groups.

HAIRTAILS, CUTLASSFISHES

Trichiuridae 1,74(04)xxx,xx

LARGEHEAD HAIRTAIL

Trichiurus lepturus 1,74(04)003,02

SNOEK

Thyrsites atun 1,74(03)001,01

Yield

Fillet Edible Flesh Comments Source
 65.4Trichiurus lepturus: Nigeria: includes skin1
50.7 T. lepturus: north west Africa: without skin2
58.0 T. lepturus: probably includes skin3
 23.9Trichiurus haumela (= T. lepturus): India4
 68.59T. haumela (= T. lepturus): Philippines: may include skin5
 52.5T. haumela (= T. lepturus): Indian Ocean: includes skin6
 61.4T. haumela (= T. lepturus): Philippines: may include skin7
 54.6–67.2T.haumela (= T.lepturus):8
 82.0Trichiurus savala (= Lepturacanthis savala): India: may include skin9
 62.0T. savala (= L. savala): India10
58.0 Lepidopus caudatus: eastern Atlantic: percentage of gutted, head-on, weight11
32.3 L. caudatus: New Zealand: mean of 4 fish15
51–62 L. caudatus: probably skin on3
42.6 Aphanopus carbo: eastern Atlantic: percentage of gutted, head on, weight11
43.8 Thyrsites atun: New Zealand: may include skin12
 60.2T. atun: includes skin13
41.5 T. atun: New Zealand: mean of 6 fish14

Selected values

Skinless fillets 46%
Edible flesh 59%

The result from source 11 for fillet yield has been converted to whole fish basis using data in source 3. Values with skin-on have been reduced by 5% and a final overall mean for fillet yield obtained.

In the case of total edible flesh, two results, from sources 4 and 9, have been excluded as extremes. Values with skin have been adjusted to skin off basis, and an overall mean taken.

Composition

Protein Fat Comments Source
18.84.1Trichiurus lepturus: north west Africa2
21.65.3T. lepturus3
16.80.3T. haumela (= T. lepturus): Philippines: may include skin7
17.892.11T. haumela (= T. lepturus): Philippines: may include skin5
18.20.7T. haumela (= T. lepturus): Indian Ocean may include skin6
16.0–21.8
mean 19.4
0.4–20.6
mean 6.8
T. haumela (= T. lepturus): several grounds and seasons: may include skin8
22.01 T. savala (= Lepturacanthis savala): India10
18.113.24T. savala (= Lepturacanthis savala): India: may include skin9
21.422.06Trichiurus spp: India: may include skin16
17.39.2Lepidopus caudatus: eastern Atlantic11
19.21.1L. caudatus: New Zealand15
20.33.0L. caudatus3
 1.6–13.2Aphanopus carbo: eastern Atlantic17
21.33.8Thyrsites atun: South Africa: 10 fish18
24.03.0T. atun: South Africa: 2 fish19
21.04.9T. atun: New Zealand12
19.33.3T. atun: New Zealand14
18.74–23.26
mean 21.91
0–11.92
mean 5.15
T. atun: South Africa: sampled monthly: total of 46 fish20
22.01.7T. atun: Australia: 2 lots: total 6 fish21
21.1–22.3
mean 21.7
0.8–13.0
mean 6.3
T. atun13

Selected values

Protein 20.1%
Fat 3.9%

No definite species difference can be discerned, so all species are considered together. Despite evidence, notably from source 8, that the fat content is variable, only one survey covering an extended period has been found (source 20). Overall averages of all the data have been calculated: they are not inconsistent with the mean values from source 20.

Sources

  1. Emokpae, A.O. Preliminary studies on the chemical and weight composition of some commercially important species of fish and shrimp caught in the Nigerian inshore waters. J. Fd Technol. 18 271–283 (1983)

  2. Tulsner, M. The technological properties and processing possibilities of important north west African commercial fish species. Fischerei-Forschung, Wissenschaftliche Schriftenreihe 3 55–63 (1965)

  3. Bykov, V.P. Marine Fishes. (Russian Translation Series 7, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1985) pp 295–297

  4. Khorana, M.L. et al. Investigations on the food value of fish and other marine products. Pt II. The protein and mineral contents. Indian J. Med. Res. 31 25–27 (1943)

  5. Sulit, J. I. et al. Proximate chemical composition of various species of Philippine market fish. Philippine J. of Fisheries 2 109–122 (1953)

  6. Bykov, V.P. et al. Technological studies of some fish species from the Indian ocean. Trudy VNIRO 72 123–142 (1971)

  7. Intengan, C.L. et al. Composition of Philippine foods V. Philippine J. of Science 85 203–213 (1956)

  8. Kizevetter I.V. Technological and chemical characteristics of commercial fish of the Pacific Ocean basin. (TNIRO, Vladivostok, 1971) pp 224–225

  9. Chari, S.T. Nutritive value of some of the west coast marine food fishes of the Madras province. Ind. J. Med. Res. 36 253–259 (1948)

  10. Setna, S.B., Sarangdhar, P.N. and Ganpule, N.V. Nutritive values of some marine fishes of Bombay. Ind. J. Med. Res. 32 171–176 (1944)

  11. Torry Research Station. Unpublished data.

  12. Pickston, L., Czochanska, Z. and Smith, J.M. The nutritional composition of some New Zealand marine fish. New Zealand J. of Sci. 25 19–26 (1982)

  13. Bykov, V.P. Source 3 above. p 120

  14. Vlieg, P. Proximate analysis of 10 commercial New Zealand fish species. New Zealand J. Sci. 27 99–104 (1984)

  15. Vlieg, P. proximate analysis of commercial New Zealand fish species. 2. New Zealand J. Sci. 27 427–433 (1984)

  16. Ayyappan, M.P.K., Shenoy, A.V. and Gopakumar, K. Proximate composition of 17 species of Indian fish. Fishery Technol. 13 153–155 (1976)

  17. Christians, O. Suitability of Aphanopus carbo for use as food. Inf. fur die Fischwirtschaft 20 184–185 (1973)

  18. Simmonds, C.K. and Heydenrych, C. Composition of South African commercial fish species. Annual Report, Fishing Industry Research Institute 38 72 (1984)

  19. Evans, A.A. and Wessels, J.P.H. Fatty acid composition of various fresh and canned products and one smoked fish product. Annual Report, Fishing Industry Research Institute 38 115–117 (1984)

  20. Van Wyk, G.F. South African fish products. Part VIII. Composition of the flesh of Cape fishes. J. Soc. Chem Ind. (Trans.) 63 367–371 (1944)

  21. Jowett, W.G. and Davies, W. A chemical study of some Australian fish. Pamphlet No 85 (Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Melbourne, 1938) pp 1–40

HAKES

Merluccius spp 1,48(05)004,xx

All species of Merluccius are similar and are considered together. Species coming within the scope of this review are:

 CAPE HAKES 
Merluccius capensis, 1,48(05)004,xx
M. paradoxus  
 EUROPEAN HAKE 
M. merluccius 1,48(05)004,01
 SILVER HAKE 
M. bilinearis 1,48(05)004,04
 CHILEAN HAKE 
M. gayi 1,48(05)004,05
 ARGENTINE HAKE 
M. hubbsi 1,48(05)004,06
 NORTH PACIFIC HAKE 
M. productus 1,48(05)004,07

Data from other species are also collected below; the selected values should be appropriate for all Merluccius species.

Yield

Fillet Edible Flesh Comments Source
44.2 Merluccius capensis, M. paradoxus: South Africa: mean of 234 fish caught throughout year1
41.8 M. capensis ) 
  )South Africa2
42.5 M. paradoxus ) 
38.051.7M. capensis: edible flesh yield by deboning machine31
25.0 M. capensis: southwest Africa34
50.6 M. merluccius: UK: 44 fish caught over 11 months: based on gutted, head on weight6
64.0 M. merluccius: UK: mean of 2 fish: based on gutted head-on weight9
50.0 M. merluccius: UK: based on gutted, head-on weight10
61.5 M.merluccius: Atlantic: mean of 4 fish: based on headed and gutted weight11
 86.5M. merluccius: recovered by deboning machine: based on headed and gutted weight12
44.0 M. senegalensis: north west Africa 15 
 45.4M. bilinearis: USA: recovered by deboning machine16
33.6 M. bilinearis: USA: mean of 30 fish of 3 different sizes17
 62.3M. bilinearis: north and north west Atlantic18
 78.6M. bilinearis: USA: recovered by deboning machine: based on headed and gutted weight19
 86.0M. bilinearis: USA: recovered by deboning machine: based on headed and gutted weight20
 65.0M. bilinearis: USA: recovered by deboning machine: based on gutted, head-on weight20
 59.0M. bilinearis: includes skin5
 47.5M. gayi: Peru: excludes belly flaps25
49.0 M. gayi: Chile: based on gutted, head-on weight26
43.0 M. hubbsi: Uruguay: includes a 
  few bones28
45.1 M. hubbsi: Uruguay: three size groups32
44.1 
40.9 
30.044.7M. productus: USA: edible flesh by deboning machine36
25.0 M. productus: USA37
30.0 ) M. productus: USA: 
27.7 ) two grounds38
 49.0M. productus: USA: by deboning machine39
47.8–57.7 M. productus: probably includes skin5
36.9 M. australis: New Zealand: mean of 6 fish44

Selected values

Skinless fillets41%
Edible flesh 53%

Values of fillet yield are very variable. After correcting data to a whole fish basis using additional data from sources 5, 28, 43 and 45 and correcting for the presence of skin by multiplying by 0.95, the range of values is from 25% to 52.5%. There is no evidence of a species variation. To arrive at the selected value, extreme values (over 45 or under 30) were omitted and the mean of the remainder taken.

Similarly, in the case of the total edible flesh figures, corrected to a whole fish basis, values over 60 or under 45 were excluded and the remainder averaged.

Composition

ProteinFatCommentsSource
16.2–20.6
mean 18.0
0.3–4.8
mean 1.6
M. capensis, M. paradoxus: South Africa: 253 (or 214) samples caught throughout year1
17.81.13M. capensis: ) South Africa: 
17.71.64M. paradoxus: ) caught on several occasions2
15.16–18.52
mean 16.89
0–1.77
mean 0.79
M. capensis: South Africa: 65 fish caught monthly3
16.30.9M. capensis: west Africa4
17.01.4M. capensis: southwest Africa35
17.80.7M. capensis:5
17.6–19.7
mean 18.5
1.50–3.80
mean 2.24
M. merluccius: UK: 44 fish caught over 11 months6
15.8–20.5
mean 17.9
 M. merluccius: UK: 183 fish caught throughout year7
18.820.62M. merluccius: north Africa: means of 20 fish: probably includes skin8
17.8–18.60.4–1.0M. merluccius: UK9
18.90.93M. merluccius: Atlantic: means of 4 fish: protein by difference11
17.50.9M. merluccius5
17.50.38 )  
13.690.36 )M. merluccius: Spain; 2 fish13
16.502.63M. merluccius; Italy14
16.571.07M. senegalensis: north west Africa15
17.221.08M. senegalensis: north Africa: means of 18 fish: probably includes skin8
16.21.48M. bilinearis: USA: means of 30 fish of 3 different sizes17
16.72.6M. bilinearis: north and north west Atlantic18
15.6–17.9
mean 16.7
1.1–4.1
mean 2.7
M. bilinearis: USA: may include skin5
16.681.35M. bilinearis: USA: means of 6 fish21
15.11.37M. bilinearis: USA: protein by difference22
15.781.67M. bilinearis: USA23
16.21.41M. bilinearis: USA: means of single batch of 14 fish24
16.3–19.5
mean 17.8
0.78–4.76
mean 2.43
M. bilinearis: USA: 20 or 25 fish40
16.30.5M. gayi: Peru25
14.2–17.40.6–1.3M. gayi: Chile27
15.890.34M. gayi30
16.41.8M. hubbsi: Uruguay: means of 2 batches33
16.421.40M. hubbsi29
17.11.2M. hubbsi34
16.41.8M. hubbsi: Uruguay30
17.81.1M. hubbsi: means of 5 samples43
16.2–22.4
mean 18.4
0.20–1.50
mean 0.69
M. productus: USA: 17 or 18 fish40
14.0–18.7
mean 16.3
0.5–3.8
mean 2.0
M. productus: USA38
15.71.44M. productus: USA: means of 18 fish41
16.21.30M. productus: USA: 1 fish42
15.0–17.4
mean 16.4
0.9–2.8
mean 1.6
M. australis: New Zealand: means of 6 fish44

Selected values

Protein 17.8%
Fat 2.5%

There are 4 sets of data that cover most of the year, from sources 1, 3, 6 and 7. The means of these have been selected and are consistent with all the other data.

Sources

  1. Simmonds, C.K., Heydenrych, C. and Jantjies, M. Composition of Cape hake - II. Annual Report, Fishing Industry Research Institute 38 69–71 (1984)

  2. Simmonds, C.K., Heydenrych, C. and Jantjies, M. Composition of Cape hake III. Annual Report, Fishing Industry Research Institute 39 64–66 (1985)

  3. van Wyk, G.F. South African fish products. Part VIII. Composition of the flesh of Cape fishes. J. Soc. Chem. Ind. (Trans.) 63 367–371 (19n4)

  4. Paetow, A., Schober, B. and Papenfuss, H.J. The chemical composition and organoleptic quality of fish from west African fishing grounds. Fischerei-Forschung, Wissenschaftliche Schriftenreiche 4 99–101 (1966)

  5. Bykov, V.P. Marine Fishes (Russian Translation Series 7, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1985) pp 107–112

  6. Pirez-Villarreal, B. and Howgate, P. Composition of European hake, Merluccius merluccius. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 40 347–356 (1987)

  7. McLay, R., Howgate, P.F. and Morrison, J. Nitrogen content of seven British commercial species of fish. J. Assoc. Publ. Analysts 24 131–139 (1986)

  8. Munoz, F. Comparative chemical study of African hakes, Merluccius merluccius (L) and Merluccius senegalensis (Cadenat) Inv. Pesq. 19 37–53 (1961)

  9. Reay, G.A., Cutting, C.L. and Shewan, J.M. The nation's food VI. Fish as food II. The chemical composition of fish. J. Soc. Chem. Ind. 62 77–85 (1943)

  10. Private communication, UK industry

  11. Angel, S. and Baker, R.C. A study of the composition of three popular varieties of fish in Israel, with a view towards further processing. J. Fd Technol. 12 27–35 (1977)

  12. Kolakowski, E., Kaminski, L. and Salacki, M. Comparison of minced flesh yield from selected sea fish species in Selo-Bibun type mincer-separators. Przemysl Spozywczy 30 60–61 (1976)

  13. Gimenez, J.C. and de las Heras, A.R. Composition and energy value of some fish eaten in Madrid. Trabajos del Instituto Español de Oceanografía No 17 (1943)

  14. Ciusa, W. and Giaccio, M. Report on nutritive value and market prices of the more important fish species of the Adriatic coast. Quaderni di Merceologia 8, 1–40 (1969)

  15. Tulsner, M. The technological properties and processing possibilities of important north west African commercial fish species. Fischerei-Forschung, Wissenschaftliche Schriftenreihe 3 55–63 (1965)

  16. Mendelsohn, J.M., Connors, T.J. and Callan, J.G. A machine for heading and viscerating small fish. Mar. Fish. Rev. 39 (2) 11–18 (1977)

  17. Brooke, R.O., Ravesi, E.M. and Steinberg, M.A. The composition of commercially important fish taken from New England waters. II. Proximate analyses of butterfish, flounder, pollock, and hake, and their seasonal variation. J. Fd Sci. 27 73–76 (1962)

  18. Minder, R.A. and Khobotilova, L.D. Technochemical characteristics of new items for the fish industry. Ryb. Khoz. No 10, 65–68 (1964)

  19. Bligh, E.G. and Regier, L.W. The potential and limitations of minced fish. Conference Proceedings: The production and utilization of mechanically recovered fish flesh (minced fish) ed. Keay, J.N. (Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, UK, 1976) pp 73–77

  20. King, F.J. and Carver, J.H. How to use nearly all the ocean's food. Oak Brook Seminar: Mechanical recovery and utilization of fish flesh. ed. Martin, R.E. (National Fisheries Institute, Washington, DC, 1972) pp 222–238

  21. Cohen, E.H. and Peters, J.A. Effect of storage in refrigerated sea water on amino acids and other components of whiting (Merluccius bilinearis). Fishery Ind. Res. 2 (2) 5–11 (1963)

  22. Krzynowek, J., Peton, D. and Wiggin, K. Proximate composition, cholesterol and calcium content in mechanically separated fish flesh from three species of the Gadidae family. J. Fd Sci. 49 1182–1185 (1984)

  23. Jhaveri, S.N. et al. Chemical composition and protein quality of some southern New England marine species. J. Fd Sci. 49 110–113 (1984)

  24. Clark, E.D. and Almy, L.H. A chemical study of food fishes. J. Biol. Chem. 33 483–498 (1918)

  25. Sanchez, T.J. and Lam, R. Development of new products from hake (Merluccius gayi peruanus) in Peru. FAO Fisheries Report No 203, Supplement (1978). Technical consultation on the Latin American hake industry. pp 177–195

  26. Hansen, P. Improved ice chilling of trawl catches in boxes and containers. ibid pp 134–141

  27. Huss, H.H. and Asenjo, I. The quality of hake from South American waters and the significance of various fish handling procedures. ibid pp 84–92

  28. Mattos, A.S. and Torrejon, S.E. Aspects of the processing of frozen hake in Uruguay. ibid pp 142–145

  29. Pedraja, R.R. Composition, quality and market factors of whiting (hake) fish blocks. ibid pp 209–221

  30. Boeri, R.L. Summary of results and conclusions from the cooperative research programme on quality of frozen hakes from Latin America. FAO Fisheries Circular No 766 (1985)

  31. Schwartz, J.W. Fish processing technology: Preliminary results from 1st survey cruise of R.V. "Professor Siedlec Polish/UNSF Highseas Fisheries Research Project (Gdynia, 1973)

  32. Avdalov, N. and Ripoll, N. Handling, quality and yield of fresh hake. Refrigeration Science and Technology 1981–4 (International Institute of Refrigeration) pp 71–77

  33. Rivero, J.E. ibid pp 301–312

  34. Chiodi, O.R. quoted by Huss, H.H. and Asenjo, I. (Source 27)

  35. Wagenknecht, W. and Horn, A. Storage properties of hake and other important edible fish from southwest African waters. Fischerei-Forschung, Wissenschaftliche Schriftenreiche 5 97–104 (1987)

  36. Crawford, D.L. et al. Yield and acceptability of machine separated minced flesh from some marine food fish. J. Fd Sci. 37 551–553 (1972)

  37. Dassow, J.A. and Beardsley, A.J. The United States experience with Pacific Hake (Merluccius productus). Fishery Products. ed. R. Kreuzer (Fishing News Books, 1974) pp 199–203

  38. Patashnik, M., Barnett, H.J. and Nelson, R.W. Proximate chemical composition of Pacific Hake. US Fish Wildlife Service, Circular 332, 121–125 (1970)

  39. Miyauchi, D. and Steinberg, M. Machine separation of edible flesh from fish. Fishery Ind. Res. 6 165–171 (1970)

  40. Sidwell, V.D., Bonnet, J.C. and Zook, E.G. Chemical and nutritive values of several fresh and canned finfish, crustacea and mollusks. Part 1: Proximate composition, calcium, and phosphorus. Mar. Fish. Rev. 35 (12) 16–19 (1973)

  41. Gordon, D.T. and Roberts, G.L. Mineral and proximate composition of Pacific coast fish. J. Agric. Fd Chem. 25 1262–1268 (1977)

  42. Dill, D.B. The proximate composition of certain Pacific coast fishes. Ind. Eng. Chem. 17 629–630 (1925)

  43. Podsevalov, V.N. and Perova, L.I. Technochemical characteristics of some Atlantic species of fish. Trudy Atlant NIRO 52 146–164 (1973)

  44. 44. Vlieg, P. Proximate analysis of 10 commercial New Zealand fish species. New Zealand J. Sci. 27 99–104 (1984)

  45. Bedford, B.C., Woolner, L.E. and Jones, B.W. Length-weight relationships for commercial fish species and conversion factors for various presentations. Fisheries Research Data Report No 10 (Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, UK, 1986)

INDIAN MACKERELS

Rastrelliger spp 1,75(01)014,xx

This monograph derives selected data for 2 items within the scope of the study:

Rastrelliger sppINDIAN MACKERELS NEI1,75(01)014,xx
Rastrelliger kanagurtaINDIAN MACKEREL1,75(01)014,03

Yield

Fillet Edible Flesh Comments Source
 65.74Rastrelliger brachysoma: Philippines1
 52.0R. brachysoma: Philippines2
 61.6R. kanagurta: India4
45.9–49.5 R. kanagurta: fillets with skin12
 58.78R. chrysozonus: Philippines1
 44.9R. chrysozonus: Philippines2

Selected values

Skinless fillets [45%]
Edible flesh 57%

The only available data for fillet yield have been corrected for the presence of skin to give the selected value. The value for total flesh is the mean of the 5 values listed.

Composition

ProteinFatCommentsSource
20.880.92Rastrelliger brachysoma: Philippines1
20.840.65R. brachysoma: Philippines2
20.76.5R. neglectus (= brachysoma): Thailand: single lot3
18.921.69R. kanagurta: India4
19.66–25.22
mean 22.03
2.58–5.32
mean 3.78
R. kanagurta: Seychelles: means of 38 fish from single lot5
20.79–24.57
mean 22.03
1.48–2.71
mean 2.08
R. kanagurta: Malaysia: means of 7 or 8 fish6
 6.0R. kanagurta: India7
21.217.51R. kanagurta: India8
 0.97–6.30
mean 3.95
R. kanagurta: India: sampled monthly over 18 months9
18.27–22.99
mean 20.95
0.63–8.50
mean 3.29
R. kanagurta: India: sampled 60 times over 3 years10
21.82.3R. kanagurta: 5 batches from different grounds and times12
20.50.7R. kanagurta: Indian ocean: 1 fish11
16.930.92R. chrysozonus: Philippines1
17.194.07R. chrysozonus: Philippines2

Selected values

Protein 20.4%
Fat 3.2%

The selected values are the means of all the collected data. They are in good agreement with the results of the only complete survey of composition (source 10).

Sources

  1. Sulit, J.I. et al. Proximate chemical composition of various species of Philippine market fishes. Philippine J. of Fisheries 2 109–122 (1953)

  2. Intengan, C.L. et al. Composition of Philippine foods, V. Philippine J. of Science 85 203–213 (1956)

  3. Keay, J.N., Rattagool, P. and Hardy, R. Chub mackerel of Thailand (Rastrelliger neglectus, Van Kempen): a short study of its chemical composition, cold storage and canning properties. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 23 1359–1368 (1972)

  4. Chari, S.T. Nutritive value of some of the west coast marine food fishes of the Madras Province. Ind. J. Med. Res. 36 253–259 (1948)

  5. King, D.R. and Poulter, R.G. Frozen storage of Indian mackerel (Rastrelliger kanagusta) and big eye (Priacanthus hamrus). Trop. Sci. 25 79–90 (1985)

  6. Abdullah, M.I. and Yu, S.Y. The effect of freezing and frozen storage on the quality of chub mackerel (R. kanagurta). FAO Fisheries Report No 317, Supplement (1985). Spoilage of tropical fish and product development. pp 230–234.

  7. Gopakumar, K. and Nair, M.R. Phospholipids of five Indian food fishes. Fishery Technol. 8 171–173 (1971)

  8. Mukundan, M.K. et al. Comparative study of the nutrient content of fish and shell fish. Fishery Technol. 18 129–132 (1981)

  9. Venkataraman, R. and Chari, S.T. Studies on mackerel fat variations: correlation of plankton fat with fat of fish. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Sect. B) 37 224–227 (1953)

  10. Venkataraman, R. and Chari, S.T. Seasonal variation in the chemical composition of mackerel (Rastrelliger kanagurta Russel). Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Sect. B) 33 126–134 (1951)

  11. Bykov, V.P. et al. Technological studies on some fish species of the Indian ocean. Trudy VNIRO 72 123–142 (1971)

  12. Kizevetter, I.V. Technological and chemical characteristics of commercial fish of the Pacific Ocean basin. (TNIRO, Vladivostok, 1971) pp 230–231

JACK AND HORSE MACKERELS

Trachurus spp 1,70(23)004,xx

All Trachurus species are considered together, since adequate data are not available for some species.

The following species and group, falling within the scope of this study, are included here:

 JACK AND HORSE MACKERELS NET 
Trachurus spp  1,70(23)004,xx
 ATLANTIC HORSE MACKEREL 
Trachurus trachurus   1,70(23)004,01
 JAPANESE JACK MACKEREL 
Trachurus japonicus   1,70(23)004,03
 CHILEAN JACK MACKEREL 
Trachurus murphyi   1,70(23)004,05
 MEDITERRANEAN HORSE MACKEREL 
Trachurus mediterraneus   1,70(23)004,08
 CAPE HORSE MACKEREL 
Trachurus capensis  1,70(23)004,13
 CUNENE HORSE MACKEREL 
Trachurus trecae  1,70(23)004,14

Some data for T. trachurus from Southern Africa is allocated to T. capensis.

Yield

Fillet Edible Flesh Comments Source
 59.50–80.68
mean 71.35
T. trachurus: Spain: mean of 51 fish over 9 month period: probably includes skin and bones1
 49–54T. trachurus: UK: recovered by deboning machine2
 60T. trachurus: Portugal: may include skin3
 46–52T. trachurus: meat without skin4
 81.1T. trachurus: yield from headed, gutted fish5
52.0–57.5 T. japonicus: probably skin-on4
 53 8–60.5T. japonicus: N Pacific: flesh and skin8
 55.3T. symmetricus murphyi: south east Pacific: flesh with skin: mean of 9 fish13
 53.5T. symmetricus murphyi: Peru: without skin14
 56.4–61.9T. symmetricus: skin-on8
 42.1–62.5  
 mean 49.9T. capensis: skin-on4
45.6 T. declivis: New Zealand: 8 fish caught at same time20

Selected values

Skinless fillets [46%]
Edible flesh 52%

The value for fillet yield from source 4 seems rather high. The value from source 20 has therefore been taken but, as it relates to a less common species, the value has been put in brackets.

The only reasonable seasonal survey of total yield is from source 1, but the yield includes skin and bones. The other data include values both with and without skin. When a 5% correction is made for skin, the two sets of data are quite concordant and their overall mean is taken.

Composition

Protein Fat Comments Source
15.06–20.21
mean 17.55
0.49–10.98
mean 4.05
T. trachurus: Spain: mean of 51 fish over 9 month period: probably includes skin and bones1
17–192.1–20.4
mean 8.47
T. trachurus: UK: caught over several years2
20.51.8T.trachurus: Portugal: may include skin3
17.6–21.7
mean 19.0
1.3–13.6
mean 5.5
T. trachurus: several fishing grounds4
 8.2T. trachurus: mean of 18 fish caught at same time6
 1.3–9.0
mean 4.7
T.trachurus: Spain: caught over 9 months7
18.14.2T. trachurus: W. Africa: 4 fish12
 1.1–23.0
mean 5.82
T.trachurus: Atlantic: monthly samples over 2 years19
18.6–22.01.0–10.0T. japonicus4
18.6–24.2
mean 20.5
0.6–10.0
mean 4.5
T. japonicus: N. Pacific: November to May8
 1.1–11.2
mean 3.8
T. japonicus: Japan: sampled 14 times over 1.5 years9
 2.9Autumn 
 3.4Winter T. japonicus 
 12.8Spring Japan: 4 batches10
 9.2Summer 
20.97.71T. japonicus: Japan: 3 fish11
 4.6T. symmetricus murphyi: south east Pacific13
19.93.1T. symmetricus murphyi : Peru14
20.3–22.53.7–4.6T. symmetricus8
21.565.62T. symmetricus: east coast USA: single fish15
17.4–21.10.1–8.7T. trachurus (=capensis): 
mean 19.7mean 3.3South Africa: 20 fish16
20.22.4T. trachurus (= capensis): South Africa: 2 fish17
19.73.9T. capensis4
19.651.52T.trachurus (=capensis): South Africa: 6 fish caught at same time18
22.06.0T. declivis: New Zealand: 8 fish caught at same time20
20.486.32T. declivis and T. novaezelandiae: mean of 6 batches caught over whole year (121 fish)21

Selected values

Protein 19.7%
Fat 5.8%

The data from source 1 cannot be used as they appear to refer to fish that include skin and bones. Other sources that cover an extended period of time (sources 2, 7, 8 (T. japonicus only), 9, 10, 19 and 21) have been averaged to give the selected values.

Sources

  1. Arevalo, A. Study of the variation in the chemical composition of horse mackerel, Trachurus trachurus (L). Boletin del Instituto Espanol de Oceanografia No 8, 1–13 (1948)

  2. Torry Research Station. Unpublished data

  3. Goncalves Ferreira, F.A. Composition and food value of some species of fish. Boletim da Pesca 8 (No 33) 89–102 (1951)

  4. Bykov, V.P. Marine Fishes (Russian Translation Series 7, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1985) pp 54–57

  5. Kolakowski, E., Kaminski, L. and Salacki, M. Comparison of minced flesh yields from selected sea-fish species in Selo-Bibun type mincerseparators. Przemysl Spozywczy 30 60–61 (1976)

  6. Smith, J.G.M. et al. Preliminary investigation into the chill and frozen storage characteristics of scad (Trachurus trachurus) and its acceptability for human consumption. Advances in Fish Science and Technology. ed. J.J. Connell (Fishing News Books, 1980) pp 303–307

  7. Instituto Español de Oceanografía. Seasonal variations in the chemical composition of the Mediterranean and Atlantic sardines. Proceedings and Technical Papers, General Fisheries Council for the Mediterranean 6 175–182 (1961)

  8. Kizevetter, I.V. Technological and chemical characteristics of commercial fish of the Pacific Ocean basin. (TNIRO, Vladivostok, 1971) pp 204–207

  9. Toyomizu, M., Nakamura, T. and Shono, T. Fatty acid composition of lipid from horse mackerel muscle. Bull. Jap. Soc. Sci. Fish. 42 101–108 (1976)

  10. Tashiro, I., Itoh, S. and Tsuyuki, H. Seasonal variation of total lipids of horse mackerel. Nippon Shokuhin Kogyo Gakkaishi 28 309–317 (1981)

  11. Saeki, K. and Kumagai, H. Chemical components in ten kinds of wild and cultured fishes. Bull. Jap. Soc. Sci. Fish. 50 1551–1554 (1984)

  12. Paetow, A., Schober, B. and Papenfuss, H.J. The chemical composition and organoleptic quality of fish from west African fishing grounds. Fischerei-Forschung, Wissenschaftliche Schriftenreihe 4 99–101 (1966)

  13. Golovin, A.N. Technological properties of some species of fish from the south east part of the Pacific Ocean. Ryb. Khoz. No 8, 69–71 (1977)

  14. Maciejczyk, J. Technological value of Peruvian fish. Przemysl Spozywczy 28 305–308 (1974)

  15. Dill, D.B. The proximate composition of certain Pacific coast fishes. Ind. Eng. Chem. 17 629–630 (1925)

  16. Simmonds, C.K. and Seaman, P.D. Composition of South African commercial fish species. Annual Report, Fishing Industry Research Institute 35 53 (1981)

  17. Evans, A.A. and Wessels, J.P.H. Fatty acid composition of various fresh and canned products and one smoked fish product. Annual Report, Fishing Industry Research Institute 38 115–117 (1984)

  18. van Wyk, G.F. South African fish products. Part VIII Composition of the flesh of Cape fishes. J. Soc. Chem. Ind. (Trans.) 63 367–371 (1944)

  19. Podsevalov, V.N. and Perova, L.A. Fat content of mackerel and scad flesh in relation to month of catching. Ryb. Khoz. No 3, 72 (1975)

  20. Pickston, L., Czochanska, Z. and Smith, J.M. The nutritional composition of some New Zealand marine fish. New Zealand. J. Sci. 25 19–26 (1982)

  21. Vlieg, P. Proximate and fatty acid composition of the flesh of New Zealand red cod, hoki and jack mackerel. New Zealand. J. Sci. 25 155–158 (1982)

JACKS, CREVALLES, NEI

Caranx spp 1,70(23)044,xx

Yield

Fillet Edible Flesh Comments Source
32.6 Caranx georgianus: skinless1
 55.1C. hippos: includes skin2
 55.5C. kalla3
 65.74C. kalla4
 58.0C. melampygus5
 53.5C. sexfasciatus3
 66.27C. sexfasciatus4
 57.3C. sp6
 38.4C. sp 
 56.7C. sp3
 52.96C. sp7

Selected values

Skinless fillets [33%]
Edible flesh 56%

The tentative value for fillet yield is that of source 1. The value for total edible flesh is the mean of all the data (after correcting source 2 data for skin). The very low value of 38.4 for an unidentified species in source 3 has been included in the calculation of the mean, as there is no good reason for excluding it.

Composition

Protein Fat Comments Source
20.751.17Caranx chrysus (= Crysos?): means of 8 fish8
19.80.2C. chrysos (= crysos?)9
19.80.2C. crysos13
20.42.7C. georgianus: means of 6 fish1
18.52.7C. carangus10
16.650.35C. djedaba3
21.31.5C. ignobilis13
19.351.03C. kalla3
19.161.67C. kalla4
 2.2C. kalla11
19.622.71C. kalla12
20.432.13C. malabaricus14
21.201.55C. melampygus5
20.70.9C. melampygus13
 0.69C. mertensi15
 0.985C. rottleri16
19.586.09C. sexfasciatus3
20.890.43C. sexfasciatus4
18.240.50C. sp3
19.313.97C. sp3
21.0 C. sp6
20.182.17C. sp7
19.2–22.8
mean 20.7
0.4–4.1
mean 1.6
C. spp: different grounds and seasons17

Selected values

Protein [19.9%]
Fat [1.7%]

No survey of any species has been found. The tentative values proposed are the means of all the data.

Sources

  1. Vlieg, P. Proximate analysis of commercial New Zealand fish species - 3. New Zealand J. Technol. 1 181–185 (1985)

  2. Emokpae, A.O. Preliminary studies on the chemical and weight composition of some commercially important species of fish and shrimp caught in the Nigerian inshore waters. J. Fd Technol. 18 271–283 (1983)

  3. Intengan, C.L. et al. Composition of Philippine foods, V. Philippine J. Sci. 85 203–213 (1956)

  4. Sulit, J.I. et al. Proximate chemical composition of various species of Philippine market fishes. Philippine J. Fisheries 2 109–122 (1953)

  5. Chari, S.T. Nutritive value of some of the west coast marine food fishes of the Madras province. Indian J. Med. Res. 36 253–259 (1948)

  6. Khorana, M.L. et al. Investigations on the food value of fish and other marine products. Part II. The protein and mineral contents. Ind. J. Med. Res. 31 25–27 (1943)

  7. Valenzuela, A. Composition and nutritive value of Philippine food fishes. Philippine J. Sci. 36 235–242 (1928)

  8. Popa, G. et al. Contributions to the veterinary inspection of sea fish. Revista de Zootehnie si medicina veterinara 18(6) 87–90 (1968)

  9. Tulsner, M. The technological properties and processing possibilities of important north west African commercial fish species. Fischerei-Forschung, Wissenschaftliche Schriftenreihe 3 55–63 (1965)

  10. Bergeret, B. Note on the nutritive value of fish from Wouri. Médicine Tropicale 18 131–136 (1958)

  11. Gopakumar, K. and Nair, M.R. Fatty acid composition of eight species of Indian marine fish. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 23 493–496 (1972)

  12. Das, K. et al. Biochemical studies on some commercially important fish of Shatt Al-Arab and the Gulf. in Conference proceedings, Handling, processing and marketing of tropical fish (Tropical Products Institute, London, 1977) pp 157–161

  13. Bykov, V.P. Marine Fishes. (Russian Translation Series 7, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1985) pp 36–37

  14. Kamel, B. Proximate, macro and micro elements analysis of Arabian Gulf fish. Lebensm. -Wiss. u. -Technol. 15 22–25 (1982)

  15. Shimma, Y. and Taguchi, H. A comparative study on fatty acid composition of fish. Bull. Jap. Soc. Sci. Fish. 30 179–188 (1964)

  16. Patakoot, R.S., Pradhan, L.B. and Murti, N.N. Fat content of the muscles of some marine fishes of Bombay. J. Univ. Bombay 18(5B) 3–6 (1950)

  17. Kizevetter, I.V. Technological and chemical characteristics of commercial fish of the Pacific Ocean basin. (TNIRO, Vladivostok, 1971) pp 202–203

JAPANESE PILCHARD

Sardinops melanosticta 1,21(05)013,01
 CALIFORNIA PILCHARD 
Sardinops caerulea  1,21(05)013,02
 SOUTH AMERICAN 
 (CHILEAN PILCHARD) 
Sardinops sagax   1,21(05)013,03
 SOUTHERN AFRICAN PILCHARD 
Sardinops ocellata  1,21,(05)013,05

All four species are similar; in the past they have all been considered subspecies of S. sagax, and will be considered together.

Yield

Fillet Edible Flesh Comments Source
 53.3S. sagax1
43–48) S. melanosticta: 
53–56) probably skin-on: two regions, different seasons2
 50.7probably S. melanosticta: mean of ranges of three lots3
 58.0S. melanosticta4
 51.4S. caerulea: 20 fish: value estimated by subtracting weights of bones, skin and fins from body weight5

Selected values

Skinless fillets 50%
Edible flesh 53%

Values are based on simple averages of the data. The value for skinless fillets is of little relevance as small fish are not normally filleted commercially, but are eaten as whole, canned (headed and gutted) dried, salted or smoked fish.

Composition

Protein Fat Comments Source
20.57.0S. sagax1
 1.25–8.75S. sagax: mean not given: sampled monthly over two years6
20–23)2.5–12)S.melanosticta: two regions, 
16–17)26–32)different seasons2
18–20 S. melanosticta5
 14.45–28.17)S. melanosticta: 52 fish 
 mean 21.87)from single catch7
 3.9–10.7)S. melanosticta: mean of 
 mean 7.02)135 fish: sampled on 11 occasions within 7 successive months8
18.8111.76S. caerulea: means of 95 fish: sampled on 12 occasions within 7 successive months9
17.5–21.70.3–0.8S. caerulea5
18.6–21.44.2–10.3S. ocellata5
17.5–21.70.3–1.4S. neopilchardus5

Selected values

Protein 18.9%
Fat 7.9%

Protein figure is mean of results from sources 2 and 9. (Source 1 was probably a single sample). Fat is mean of data from 6, 8 and 9, the only surveys that cover an extended period of the year. The higher figures from sources 2 and 7 suggest that there may be a geographical as well as a seasonal variation. The selected value is consistent with the results of a 5 year survey of the fat content of whole Southern African pilchards (source 10).

Sources

  1. Maciejczyk, J. Technological value of Peruvian fish. Przemysl Spozywczy 28 305–308 (1974)

  2. Vakhrusheva, M.N. and Nikiforova, G.A. Technochemical characteristics of frozen west Pacific sardine. Ryb. Khoz. No 3, 51–54 (1979)

  3. Suzuki, T. Fish and krill protein: processing technology. (Applied Science Publishers, London, 1981) p135

  4. Kizevetter, I.V. Technological and chemical characteristics of commercial fish of the Pacific Ocean Basin. (TNIRO, Vladivostok, 1971) pp70–71

  5. Bykov, V.P. Marine fishes. (Russian Translation Series 7, A.A.Balkema, Rotterdam, 1985) p84

  6. Pazos, M., Wakao, A. and Vicetti, R. Lipid and fatty acid composition of Peruvian sardines. Boletín de Investigación, Instituto Technológico Pesquero 2(1) 1–24 (1984)

  7. Yamada, J. Content and distribution of lipid in sardine flesh. Bull. Tokai Reg. Fish. Res. Lab. No. 104, 103–109 (1981)

  8. Hayashi, K. and Takagi, T. Seasonal variation in lipids and fatty acids of sardine, Sardinops melanosticta. Bull. Fac. Fish. Hokkaido Univ. 28, 83–94 (1977)

  9. Dill, D.B. A chemical study of the California sardine (Sardinea caerulea). J. Biol. Chem. 48 93–103 (1921)

  10. Black, M.M. and Schwartz, H.M. South African fish products XXX- Seasonal changes in the composition of the pilchard (Sardina ocellata Jenyns). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 1 182–185 (1950)

JELLYFISHES

Rhopilema spp 6,17(41)007,xx

Little information is readily available on the mode of utilization of jellyfishes. No data has been collected on the edible yield. Only one analysis (1) has been found: protein content was 0.8% and fat content 0.1%. It would appear that the contribution to the protein and fat intake of any country from jellyfish would be insignificant.

Source

1. Moodie, I.M., Burger, J. and Heydenrych, C. Composition of jellyfish. Annual Report, Fishing Industry Research Institute 34 50 (1980)

MILKFISH

Chanos chanos 1,22(02)001,01

Yield

Fillet Edible Flesh Comments Source
 60.7Philippines: pond-raised: 240 fish between 100 and 1200 g studied1
 67.10large ) 
 61.64medium ): Philippines2
 70.56Philippines: may include skin3
 68.4Philippines: may include skin4
 67.5Philippines: may include skin5

Selected values

Skinless fillets [46%]
Edible flesh 61%

The figure for edible flesh is from the extensive data of source 1; it is consistent with the remaining data. The provisional figure for fillet yield is the figure for Atlantic herring, chosen on the slender grounds that milkfish is sometimes described as “resembling herring”.

Composition

Protein Fat Comments Source
20.575.28large ) 
20.735.67medium ) : Philippines2
19.245.57Philippines3
20.536.16Philippines4
21.43.46Philippines5
 3.5India: mean of 12 fish6
24.063.51India7

Selected values

Protein 21.1%
Fat 4.7%

The selected values are means of all the data: no surveys are available.

Sources

  1. Arroyo, P.T. et al. Relationship of meat yield to round weight of milkfish (Chanos chanos, Forskal). Conference Proceedings: Handling, processing and marketing of tropical fish. (Tropical Products Institute, London, 1977) pp 151–155

  2. Sulit, J. et al. Proximate chemical composition of various species of Philippine market fishes. Philippine J. of Fisheries 2 109–122 (1953)

  3. Valenzuela, A. Composition and nutritive value of Philippine food fishes. Philippine J. of Science 36 235–242 (1928)

  4. Intengan, C.L. et al. Composition of Philippine foods, V. Philippine J. of Science,85 203–213 (1956)

  5. Santos, F.O. and Ascalon, S.J. Amount of nutrients in Philippine food materials. Philippine Agriculturist 20 402–409 (1931)

  6. Nair, P.G.V. and Gopakumar, K. Lipid and fatty acid composition of fish and shellfish. J. Food Sci. and Technol. 21 389–392 (1984)

  7. Joseph, J. et al. Iced and frozen storage characteristics of cultured Chanos chanos (Forskal). Fish. Technol. 17 21–25 (1980)

MULLETS NEI

Mugilidae 1,65(01)xxx,xx

and

FLATHEAD MULLET
Mugil cephalus 1,65(01)001,02

Yield

Fillet Edible Flesh Comments Source
 48.7Mugil cephalus: Mediterranean: probably includes skin and bones1
 55.6M. cephalus: Philippines: probably includes skin2
31.8 M. cephalus: Atlantic: mean of 11 fish3
 68.5M. cephalus: Spain: may include skin and bones4
41.7 M. cephalus: north west Africa: skinless5
28.7 M. cephalus: New Zealand: skinless: mean of 6 fish6
 73.5M. oeur: India: may include skin and bones7
 56.4–61M.so-iuy: Pacific: includes skin8
 44.5M. sp: Philippines9
 48Mugil (= Liza) vaigiensis: Philippines10
 70Mugil (= Valamugil) speigleri: India: 
  may include skin and bones11

Selected values

Skinless fillets 34%
Edible flesh50%

The skinless fillet figure is the mean of the collected results. The total flesh data that may include bones have been omitted, and the mean of the remainder taken, after correcting for skin where necessary by a 5% reduction.

Composition

Protein Fat Comments Source
21.816.78Mugil cephalus: Mediterranean: may include skin and bone1
18.44.3M. cephalus: Philippines: probably includes skin2
18.61.1M. cephalus: Atlantic: means of 11 fish3
17.883.04M. cephalus: Spain4
21.150.98M. cephalus: north west Africa5
21.63.4M. cephalus: New Zealand: means of 6 fish6
18.912.5M. cephalus: Australia: means of 3 batches12
20.845.06M. cephalus: India13
 3.54M. cephalus: Japan: mean of 2 fish14
17.801.24M. cephalus: Spain: single fish15
 4.5M. cephalus: east USA: sampled over 10 months of year in 4 locations: mean of 20 batches16
 5.06M. cephalus: India: mean of 10 fish17
20.31.70M. cephalus: Japan18
20.00.7M. cephalus: west Africa19
19.36.1M. cephalus: Pacific: mean of 3 grounds8
19.067.83M. oeur: India7
20.222.45M. oeur: India20
 3.0M. passia: India21
19.69.8M. so-iuy: Pacific: means of 3 grounds and several catching times8
20.44.8M. sp: east USA22
20.684.23M. sp: Philippines9
20.412.55Mugil (= Liza) vaigiensis: Philippines23
20.822.62Mugil (= Liza) vaigiensis: Philippines10
19.01–22.90
mean 21.20
0.20–10.29
mean 5.28
Mugil (= Liza) capito: South Africa24
17.83 Mugil (= Valamugil) speigleri: India11
 0.515Mugil (= Valamugil) speigleri: India25
 0.806Mugil (= Valamugil) speigleri: Pakistan26

Selected values

Protein 19.8%
Fat4.0%

Only one good survey, of fat only, has been found (Source 16). There seems to be no significant differences among species and related genera and so the selected values are means of all the data. The mean fat content agrees well with the single survey result.

Sources

  1. Carteni, A. and Aloj, G. Chemical composition of marine animals of the Gulf of Naples. 1. Teleostei. Quaderni della Nutrizione 1 49–63 (1934)

  2. Santos, F.O. and Ascalon, S.J. Amount of nutrients in Philippine food materials. Philipp. Agric. 20 402–409 (1931)

  3. Ousterhout, L.E. Technical Note No 56. Chemical composition and laboratory fillet yield of 13 species of middle and south Atlantic fish. Comm. Fish. Rev. 22 (7) 15–16 (1960)

  4. de las Heras, A.R. and Mendez Isla, M.C. Contribution to the chemical study of some Spanish fish. Anales de Bromatología 4 403–410 (1952)

  5. Tulsner, M. The technological properties and processing possibilities of important north west African commercial fish species. Fischerei-Forschung, Wissenschaftliche Schriftenreihe 3 55–63 (1965)

  6. Vlieg, P. Proximate analysis of commercial New Zealand fish species.2. New Zealand. J. of Sci. 27 427–433 (1984)

  7. Chari, S.T. Nutritive value of some of the west coast marine food fishes of the Madras province. Ind. J. Med. Res. 36 253–259 (1948)

  8. Kizevetter, I.V. Technological and chemical characteristics of commercial fish of the Pacific Ocean basin. (Vladivostok, 1971) pp 193–194

  9. Valenzuela, A. Composition and nutritive value of Philippine food fishes. Philippine J. of Sci. 36 235–242 (1928)

  10. Intengan, C.L. et al. Composition of Philippine foods, V. Philippine J. of Sci. 85 203–213 (1956)

  11. Setna, S.B., Sarangdhar, P.N. and Ganpule, N.V. Nutritive values of some marine fishes of Bombay. Ind. J. Med. Res. 32 171–176 (1944)

  12. Jowett, W.G. and Davies, W. A chemical study of some Australian fish. Pamphlet No 85 (Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Melbourne, 1938) pp 1–40

  13. Mukundan, M.K. and James, M.A. Nutritional quality of some food fish. Fish. Technol. 15 85–87 (1978)

  14. Hirao, S., Yamada, J. and Kikuchi, R. Vitamin A in fish meat - III Individual fluctuation in the vitamin A content in fish meat. Bull. Jap. Soc. Sci. Fish. 20 853–859 (1955)

  15. Gimenez, J.C. and de las Heras, A.R. Chemical studies of some Spanish fish. Trabajos, Instituto Español de Oceanografía No 17 (1943)

  16. Deng, J.C. et al. Lipids and fatty acids in mullet (Mugil cephalus): seasonal and locational variations. J. Fd Sci. 41 1479–1483 (1976)

  17. Nair, P.G.V. and Gopakumar, K. Fatty acid compositions of 15 species of fish from tropical waters. J. Fd Sci. 43 1162–1164 (1978)

  18. Saeki, K. and Kumagai, H. Chemical components in ten kinds of wild and cultured fishes. Bull. Jap. Soc. Sci. Fish. 50 1551–1554 (1984)

  19. Bergeret, B. Note on the nutritive value of fish from Wouri. Médicine Tropicale 18 131–136 (1958)

  20. Mukundan, M.K. et al. Comparative study of the nutrient content of fish and shellfish. Fish. Technol. 18 129–132 (1981)

  21. Gopakumar, K. and Nair, M.R. Fatty acid composition of eight species of Indian marine fish. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 23 493–496 (1972)

  22. Sidwell, V.D. and Ambrose, M.E. Nutritional and chemical evaluation of the protein of various finfish and shellfish. Protein Nutritional Quality of Food and Feeds, Part 2. ed. Friedman, M. (Marcel Dekker, 1975) pp 197–209

  23. Sulit, J.I. et al. Proximate chemical composition of various species of Philippine market fishes. Philippine J. of Fisheries 2 109–122 (1953)

  24. van Wyk, G.F. South African fish products. Part VIII. Composition of the flesh of Cape fishes. J. Soc. Chem. Ind. (Trans.) 63 367–371 (1944)

  25. Patakoot, R.S., Pradhan, L.B. and Murti, N.N. Fat content of the muscles of some marine fishes of Bombay. J. Univ. Bombay 18 (5B) 3–6 (1960)

  26. Khan, A. H. and Haq, S.A. Studies on marine edible (Teleostii) fishes Part 1. - Distribution of oil and vitamin A in the skin, flesh and liver of edible fishes of Karachi waters. Pakistan J. Sci. Ind. Res. 1–2 309–311 (1958–59)

NILE PERCH

Lates niloticus 1,70(01)167,07

No data on yield or composition of Nile perch have been found. Limited data on the related species, Centropomus undecimalis, are given below.

Yield

Fillet Comments Source
57Centropomus undecimalis1

Selected values

Skinless fillet [57%]
Edible flesh [65%]

The value for edible flesh is a likely maximum: no closely comparable species is included in the present survey.

Composition

Protein Fat Comments Source
21.20.83Centropomus undecimalis1

Selected values

Protein [21.2%]
Fat [ 0.8%]

Source

  1. Tucker, J.W., Landau, M.P. and Faulkner, B.E. Culinary value and composition of wild and captive common snook, Centropomus undecimalis. Florida Sci. 48 196–200 (1985)

NORTHERN PRAWN

Pandalus borealis 2,28(04)002,03

Yield

Edible Flesh Comments Source
36.2Pandalus borealis: raw, iced, washed2
33.0P. borealis: cooked2

Selected value

Meat       [36%]

Only one measurement of yield of raw meat has been collected.

Composition

Protein Fat Comments Source
15.2Pandalus borealis: raw, iced, washed1
13.5–20.2
mean 17.1
0.12–0.82
mean 0.39
P. borealis: raw: means of 19 or 23 batches3
18.10.95P. borealis: raw: means of 5 batches4
 1.32P. borealis: raw: mean of 8 batches5
 1.2–1.5P. borealis: raw6
18.81.55P. jordani: cooked7

Selected values

Protein 16.8%
Fat 1.0%

The selected values are means of all “raw” data.

Sources

  1. Bullard, F.A. and Collins, J. Physical and chemical changes of pink shrimp, Pandalus borealis, held in carbon dioxide modified refrigerated seawater compared with pink shrimp held in ice. Fishery Bull. 76 73–78 (1978)

  2. Aagaard, J. Handling and processing the deep-sea shrimp Pandalus borealis for the freezing industry. Fishery Products. ed Kreuzer, R. (Fishing News Books, 1974) pp 167–172

  3. Sidwell, V.D., Bonnet, J.C. and Zook, E.G. Chemical and nutritive values of several fresh and canned finfish, crustaceans, and mollusks Part I. Proximate composition, calcium, and phosphorus. Mar. Fish. Rev. 35(12) 16–19 (1973)

  4. Stansby, M.G. Chemical characteristics of fish caught in the northeast Pacific Ocean. Mar. Fish. Rev. 38(9) 1–11 (1976)

  5. Bonnet, J.C., Sidwell, V.D. and Zook, E.G. Chemical and nutritive values of several fresh and canned finfish, crustaceans, and mollusks. Part II: Fatty acid composition. Mar. Fish. Rev. 36(2) 8–14 (1974)

  6. Krzeczkowski, R.A. Fatty acids in raw and processed Alaska pink shrimp. J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc. 47 451–452 (1970)

  7. Gordon, D.T. and Roberts, G.L. Mineral and proximate composition of Pacific coast fish. J. Agric. Fd Chem. 25 1262–1268 (1977)

PACIFIC COD

Gadus macrocephalus 1,48(04)002,11

Yield

Fillet Edible Flesh Comments Source
28.8 mean of 108 fish caught at various times1
31.8 mean of 3 batches2
 37.8by deboning machine3
28.040.4flesh yield by deboning machine4
 45.2 8

Selected values

Skinless fillets 30%
Edible flesh 41%

The available data, though limited, are self consistent: selected values are means of the data quoted. They are lower than the corresponding data for Gadus morhua, but this is at least consistent with the species name macrocephalus.

Composition

Protein Fat Comments Source
15.8–19.1
mean 17.9
0.31–0.78
mean 0.62
means of 108 fish1
 0.58mean of 10 fillets5
17.10.78means of 33 fish from same source6
17.10.9 7
17.00.4means of several grounds and seasons8

Selected values

Protein 17.3%
Fat 0.7%

The data available are again, surprisingly, limited but consistent. Selected values are means of the data quoted. They are close to the figures selected for Gadus morhua.

Sources

  1. Thurston, C.E. Proximate composition and sodium and potassium contents of four species of commercial bottom fish. J. Fd Sci. 26 495–498 (1961)

  2. Tomlinson, N., Kramer, D.E. and Geiger, S.E. Weight changes in Pacific cod and halibut stored in ice at sea. Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Vancouver Laboratory, Circular No 45 (1969)

  3. Miyauchi, D. and Steinberg, M. Machine separation of edible flesh from fish. Fishery Ind. Res. 6 165–171 (1970)

  4. Crawford, D.L. et al. Yield and acceptability of machine separated minced flesh from some marine food fish. J. Fd Sci. 37 551–553 (1972)

  5. Wood, J.D. and Haqq, S.A. Fat hydrolysis in frozen fillets of lingcod and Pacific gray cod. J. Fish. Res. Bd Canada 19 169–171 (1962)

  6. Gordon, D.T. and Roberts, G.A. Mineral and proximate composition of Pacific coast fish. J. Agric. Food Chem. 25 1262–1268 (1977)

  7. Bykov V.P. Marine Fishes. (Russian Translation Series 7, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1985) pp 103–104

  8. Kizevetter, I.V. Technological and chemical characteristics of commercial fish of the Pacific Ocean basin. TNIRO, Vladivostok, 1971) pp 174–184

PACIFIC CUPPED OYSTER

Crassostrea gigas 3,16(07)008,01

Also included here are:

AMERICAN CUPPED OYSTER

Crassostrea virginica 3,16(07)008,03

CUPPED OYSTERS NEI
Crassostrea spp 3,16(07)008,xx

Data from other Crassostrea and Ostrea species are included in the assessment. These allow a separate yield to be estimated for Ostrea spp, although Ostrea spp do not come within the scope of this survey.

Yield

Oysters, especially Crassostrea, are commonly found in estuaries where the salinity of the water may vary. The meat of the oyster readily alters its water content in response to such variation. For this reason, many of the measurements of yield in the literature are based on the dry weights of the meats and in the absence of data on water content, cannot be taken into account. As the entire contents of the oyster are eaten, only one yield figure is appropriate. Some variability in the available data is to be expected because of the water content variability, and also because the liquor within the shell may sometimes be included in the edible portion. It is seldom clear whether this is so: data that definitely do include the liquor have been excluded.

Edible Flesh Comments Source
11.8Crassostrea virginica: America: sampled twice only1
9.2C. virginica: Canada: mean of two lots2
9.94C. angulata: Spain: 333 specimens harvested on 28 occasions throughout year3
9.20Ostrea virginiana (= Crassostrea sp): India: sampled 28 times over complete year4
11.29O.edulis: Canada: mean of 2 lots2
8.22–16.19
mean 11.81
O.edulis: England: 4 grounds sampled over complete year5
11–17O. edulis: UK6
18O. orientalis: Philippines7
15O. laperousei: Japan: mean of three samples at different times8
15.00O. cucullata: India9

Selected values

Edible flesh

Crassostrea spp10%
Ostrea14%

The yields for Crassostrea species tend to be lower than those for Ostrea. The two Crassostrea surveys covering a whole year (sources 3 and 4) have been averaged to give the selected value. As there is only one survey of an Ostrea species over a year (source 5), all the figures have been averaged.

Composition

Oysters, like many molluscs, contain significant amounts of glycogen. In most of the sources below glycogen is determined directly. In a very few cases the figure for glycogen is for total carbohydrate by analysis or by difference.

Protein Fat Glycogen Comments Source
 2.5 Crassostrea gigas: mean of 12 specimens caught at same time10
11.52.21.7C. gigas: Korea: means of values in 8 months of year11
4.48–10.48
mean 6.82
0.56–1.97
mean 1.10
 C. virginica: USA: means of 40 fish12
8.592.36 C. virginica: USA: means of 2 batches1
5.71.13.1C. virginica: USA: means over two years and 6 grounds13
 1.11.8C. virginica: Canada: single batch14
5.8–10.4
mean 7.15
1.4–3.0
mean 2.3
0.47–6.92
mean 2.36
C. virginica: USA: means over full year from 2 grounds15
11.2811.672.62C. angulata: Spain: 28 samples over complete year3
5.72–13.31
mean 9.79
1.01–3.07
mean 2.04
0.46–5.85
mean 2.65
Ostrea virginiana (= Crassostrea sp): India: sampled over whole year4
10.511.926.27O. edulis: England: 4 grounds sampled over whole year or most of year5
6.53.23.2O. orientalis: Philippines7
9.410.743.60O. laperousei: Japan: 3 samples at different times of year8
25.01.680.84O. cucullata: India: single sample9
8.11.35.7O. taurica: Black Sea: sampled over 7 months16
8.401.963.56species not stated: Japan: sampled over whole year17

Four sets of data, from sources 3, 4, 13 and 14, cover analyses of Crassostrea spp over the complete year. Within these 4 sets there are big variations in mean content of protein, from 5.7 to 11.5%. There are, however, no grounds for excluding any data, or for estimating values for separate species. The selected values are therefore the means of the 4 sets of data.

There is only one set of data over a complete year, from source 5, for Ostrea spp: in this work glycogen is actually carbohydrate by difference and so subject to a degree of doubt. Apart from the protein content in source 9, which must be considered doubtful, the Ostrea data are consistent with the selected Crassostrea values.

Selected values (for Crassostrea spp: probably suitable also for Ostrea spp)

Protein 8.5%
Fat 1.8%
Glycogen 2.7%

Sources

  1. Anthony, J.E. et al. Yields, proximate composition and mineral content of finfish and shellfish. J. Fd Sci. 48 313–314, 316 (1983)

  2. Watanabe, T. and Ackman, R.G. Effect of storage on lipids and fatty acids of oysters. Can. Inst. Food Sci. Technol. J. 10 40–42 (1977)

  3. Establier, R. Seasonal variation of the chemical composition of the oyster (Crassostrea angulata Lmk.) and its relation to hydrological and planktonic variations. Invest. Pesq. 30 501–528 (1966)

  4. Venkataraman, R. and Chari, S.T. Studies on oysters and clams: bio-chemical variations. Ind. J. Med. Res. 39 533–541 (1951)

  5. Russell, E.S. Report on seasonal variation in the chemical composition of oysters. Fishery Investigations (Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries) Series II 6 No 1 (1923)

  6. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (UK). Unpublished data

  7. Santos, F.O. and Ascalon, S.J. Amount of nutrients in Philippine food materials. Philippine Agriculturist 20 402–409 (1931)

  8. Takogi, I. and Simidu, W. Studies on muscle of aquatic animals - XXXV. Seasonal variation of chemical constituents and extractive nitrogens in some species of shellfish. Bull. Jap. Soc. Sci. Fish. 29 66–70 (1963)

  9. Suryanarayanan, H. and Alexander, K.M. Biochemical investigations on edible molluscs of Kerala 1. A study on the nutritional value of some bivalves. Fishery Technol. 9 42–47 (1972)

  10. Gruger, E.H., Nelson, R.W. and Stansby, M.E. Fatty acid composition of oils from 21 species of marine fish, freshwater fish and shellfish. J. Amer. Oil. Chem. Soc. 41 662–667 (1964)

  11. Lee, E-H. et al. Suitability of shellfishes for processing 3 Suitability of Pacific oyster for processing. Bull. Korean Fish. Soc. 8 90–100 (1975)

  12. Sidwell, V.D., Bonnet, J.C. and Zook, E.G. Chemical and nutritive values of several fresh and canned finfish, crustaceans, and molluscs. Part 1: proximate composition, calcium, and phosphorus. Marine Fisheries Review 35(12) 16–19 (1973)

  13. Galtsoff, P.S. The American Oyster Crassostrea virginica Gmelin. Fishery Bulletin of the Fish and Wildlife Service, Vol 64 (US Dept. of Interior, 1964)

  14. Baker, M.E.T. Variations in the water, fat, glycogen and iodine of the flesh of oysters (Ostrea virginica) during hibernation and storage at 4°C. J. Physiol. 101 36–43 (1942)

  15. Sidwell, V.D., Loomis, A.L. and Grodner, R.M. Geographic and monthly variation in composition of oysters, Crassostrea virginica. Mar. Fish. Rev. 41(3) 13–17 (1979)

  16. Goromosova, S.A. Seasonal variations in the chemical composition of Black Sea oysters. Gidrobiol. Zh. 4(3) 72–76 (1968)

  17. Sekine, S., Tatsuno, S. and Imamura, F. On the seasonal variation in the chemical composition of oysters. 4th Pacific Science Conf. 3 349–351 (1929)

PACIFIC HERRING

Clupea pallasi 1,21(05)001,07

Yield

Fillet Edible Flesh Comments Source
 66.6by deboning machine1
 64–77includes skin and bones2
50–60 fillets with skin3
 41.6–65.4flesh without skin4

Selected values

Skinless fillets [52%]
Edible flesh60%

The data are very limited. The fillet value is the mean figure from source 3, reduced by 5% to take account of skin. The edible flesh value is the mean of data from sources 1 and 4.

Composition

Protein Fat Comments Source
16.85.5“spring” : Apr.-May ) Sakhalin5
17.819.0“feeding” : June-Oct. ) 
18.76.3“spring” : Nov.-June ) Japan and 
18.212.0“oily” : various times ) adjacent sea and grounds )6
 12.0Apr.-Aug.: Kamchatka: 7 batches7
 12.9Aug.-Sept.: Sea of Okhotsk: 9 batches8
15.3–18.6
mean 17.0
1.2–20.6
mean 13.5
Mar.-Nov.: Vladivostok4
 11.1May-Aug.: several grounds4
16.2–20.4
mean 18.1
1.0–25.7
mean 12.0
Apr.-Nov.: Sakhalin: 7 batches4
 4.5–25.1
mean 11.6
early May-early Oct.: Sea of Okhotsk4
16.72.62 batches, total of 20 fish9
16.012.5USA: 2 batches, total of 14 fish10
15–92–35 2

Selected values

Protein 17.8%
Fat 11.6%

The data include several surveys of fish caught over the commercial catching period. All surveys, from sources, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, are averaged to give the selected values.

Sources

  1. Miyauchi, D. and Steinberg, M. Machine separation of edible flesh from fish. Fishery Ind. Res. 6 165–171 (1970)

  2. Bykov, V.P. Opportunities for upgrading fish with lower market value. Fishery Products. ed. R. Kreuzer. (Fishing News Books, 1974) pp 153–156

  3. Bykov, V.P. Marine Fishes. (Russian Translation Series 7, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1985) pp 73–74

  4. Kizevetter, I.V. Technological and chemical characteristics of commercial fish of the Pacific Ocean basin. (TNIRO, Vladivostok, 1971) pp 25–68

  5. Levanidov, I.P. Chemical composition of the flesh of herring from the west coast of Sakhalin. Ryb. Khoz. No 2, 37–40 (1950)

  6. Sasa, S. Chemical studies on herring meat. Bull. Fac. Fish. Hokhaido Univ. 8 319–345 (1958)

  7. Kondo, H. Studies on the lipids of herring I. The lipids of the north-eastern Kamchatka herring. Bull. Fac. Fish. Hokhaido Univ. 25 68–77 (1974)

  8. Kondo, H. Studies on the lipids of herring II. The lipids of the northern Okhotsk herring. Bull. Fac. Fish. Hockhaido Univ. 26 289–301 (1975)

  9. Dill, D.B. The proximate composition of certain Pacific coast fishes. Ind. Eng. Chem. 17 629–630 (1925)

  10. Stansby, M.E. Chemical characteristics of fish caught in the northeast Pacific Ocean. Mar. Fish. Rev. 38(9) 1–11 (1976)


Previous Page Top of Page Next Page