Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


Monitoring landings of Taiwanese tuna longliners at Penang Harbour

P.E. Chee
Fisheries Research Institute
Department of Fisheries Malaysia
11700 Gelugor, Penang, Malaysia

Sok Kean Khoo
70 Lorong Ipoh
11600 Penang, Malaysia

ABSTRACT

Foreign fishing boats, particularly Taiwanese tuna longliners, are attracted to Penang because of her strategic location in the Straits of Malacca and the support of good port and communication facilities. Monitoring of the total landings of tuna by Taiwanese tuna longliners began in 1990. From mid-1992 until the end of 1993, the monitoring of tuna landed and transshipped through Penang was done more systematically with the financial support of the Indo-Pacific Tuna Development and Management Programme (IPTP). From this monitoring programme information on total catch, species composition, and size information of the major tuna species, i.e., yellowfin tuna was compiled. The seasonality of fishing activities, fishing grounds and fishing vessel information were documented. The increase in longlining for yellowfin in the eastern Indian Ocean may cause possible interactions among tuna fisheries in other parts of the Indian Ocean. The information collected from this monitoring programme is important since without this documentation, a good part of the information relating to the exploitation of the tuna resources in the Indian Ocean will not be known.

1. INTRODUCTION

During the 1960s, Penang served as a landing and transshipment port for foreign tuna fishing vessels. This activity ceased in the 1970s but had resumed since the mid-80s. The number of Taiwanese tuna fishing vessels discharging their catch at Penang Harbour has increased since the mid-80s due to Penang's strategic location, good support facilities, good international air and sea linkages, and the presence of similar cultures (Mohamad, 1993).

The Taiwanese started tuna longline fishing in the Indian Ocean in 1963. Initially their main target was albacore (Thunnus alalunga), but two years later switched to yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) and bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) (Hsu and Liu, 1991).

The tuna longliners that land at Penang Harbour are generally small vessels averaging 50 GRT and are powered by engines of about 400 hp. These vessels operate for a duration of up to one month at sea. The fishing grounds in the Indian Ocean lie mainly between 0-10°N latitudes and to 80-95°E longitudes. Each vessel has 7-10 crew members. Fishing is usually carried out at depths between 45-70 m. A description of the fishing vessels, their gear and mode of operation was documented earlier (Khoo and Chee, 1994). The bulk of the tuna is exported to Japan in the chilled form for the sashimi market. Second-grade tuna are sold in the frozen form both to local and foreign canneries.

2. TOTAL LANDINGS

The total recorded landings of tuna in Penang from 1990 to September 1994 are shown in Figure 1. For the four year period, a clear seasonality in landings was observed. Landings of tuna peak in December/January annually while the lowest recorded landings were in the middle of the year. Total landings ranged from 136 tonnes per month to 2,040 tonnes per month over the period covered from 1990 to September 1994. It is of interest to note that the highest landings corresponded with the highest demand of the Japanese sashimi market which occurs during the New Year period.

Figure 1. Berthings and landings, 1990-94 (data from Penang Port Commission).

3. TOTAL NUMBER OF BERTHINGS

Figure 1 also shows the number of berthings recorded by the Penang Port Commission. The highest number of berthings were recorded also during the months of December of one year and January of the following year. There is a close correlation between the number of berthings and the quantity of tuna landed.

4. SPECIES COMPOSITION

Table 1 shows the species composition of sampled landings by month for 1992 and 1993. It is clear that yellowfin tuna (Figure 2) always made up the highest proportion of the landings; bigeye were landed in smaller amounts. Marlins (Makaira indica, M. mazara and Tetrapturus audax), swordfish (Xiphias gladius), sailfish (Istiophorus platypterus), skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis), wahoo (Acanthocybium solandri), barracudas (Sphyraena), and a few species of sharks were also landed.

Table 1. Composition of Taiwanese longline landings (kg) at Penang Harbour, 1992-93.

Year

Month

Yellowfin

Bigeye

Martins

Swordfish

Sharks

Others

Total

1992


 

Jan.

424852

32176

19035

7992

7318

5996

497369

Feb.

228311

36614

10985

6548

3434

2536

288428

March

126324

20417

6256

1922

1967

1566

158452

April

37029

6403

2759

1099

492

1352

49134

May

69163

7637

4938

4862

1387

3464

91451

June

20384

2133

1956

246

542

137

25398

July

34389

7586

7787

4533

7310

5989

67594

Aug.

13805

1055

993

1589

6345

1172

24959

Sept.

58797

17452

8980

8817

3637

8660

106343

Oct.

60357

7622

7484

4790

4754

5610

90617

Nov.

122033

20907

9555

2978

3880

3825

163178

Dec.

371523

80470

27579

6235

2945

4329

493081

1993


 

Jan.

317381

52654

19200

5808

4823

4194

404060

Feb.

276376

61624

10101

3296

2864

7168

361429

March

206259

89623

6957

3352

1853

5003

313047

April

140353

38189

1449

1417

596

5582

187586

May

158014

24116

18613

1261

632

4209

206845

June

66223

10259

7718

2043

1886

5500

93629

July

35378

12827

5337

3004

581

3548

60675

Aug.

47141

15980

6944

6838

1408

7205

85516

Sept.

124643

25293

8711

7702

3509

8271

178129

Oct.

46806

8746

8753

2680

1372

3503

71860

Nov.

68578

32719

19247

10411

6093

14265

151313

Dec.

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.


Figure 2. Species composition of Taiwanese longline landings at Penang Harbour, 1992-93.

5. SIZE COMPOSITION

The average gilled-and-gutted weight of yellowfin and bigeye tuna sampled by month in 1992 and 1993 is shown in Figure 3. For both yellowfin and bigeye tuna, the average gilled-and-gutted weights, were low during the third quarter of the year. This shows that more large fish were caught during the time of peak fishing activity. However from Figure 4, it can be seen that the weight of fish landed per berthing (or per fishing trip), appears to be rather consistent, i.e., approximately 10 tonnes per berthing. This quantity of fish is possibly limited by the size of the fish hold of the vessel as well as by the saturation time of handling of the fish on board to maintain the quality desired for export to the Japanese sashimi market.

6. HANDLING

6.1 Tuna for Sashimi

On board the fishing vessel, tuna directed to the sashimi market are killed, dressed and chilled immediately after capture. The fish are also to be handled gently, yet quickly, to prevent bruises and the condition called "yake niku" or burnt flesh. Fish in this condition cannot be sold for sashimi because of their unpleasant appearance, acidic flavour and metallic after-taste (Putro, 1990). Fish that are not dressed on board are gilled-and-gutted at the landing site. Sashimi-grade tuna are chilled with crushed ice. Fish for export are packed in cartons with dry ice while second-grade tuna are usually frozen and sold to local canneries or exported.

Figure 3. Average gilled-and-gutted weight of yellowfin and bigeye tuna.

Figure 4. Landings per berthing recorded at Penang Harbour, 1990-94 (data from Penang Port Commission).

6.2 Other Bycatch

Almost all the bycatch are killed and eviscerated and the heads and fins are cut off before being stored in deep freeze. However some prime quality marlins are also chilled and sold for sashimi as well. Swordfish are usually exported to European markets for fish steak.

6.3 Possible Interactions

The increase in longlining for yellowfin in the eastern Indian Ocean may affect the present fishing activities in the western part of the Indian Ocean. In the western Indian Ocean, fishing primarily by Spanish and French purse seiners catch yellowfin in addition to skipjack (Lablache, 1991). Thus interaction may arise from the fishing of the same species but at different life cycle stages since purse seiners generally catch smaller size fish from surface schools. Fishing in parts of Indonesia, which also uses the longline, may be affected, e.g., in areas to the west of Sumatra, where a similar fishery targeting for sashimi-grade tuna has recently developed (Naamin and Bahar, 1994).

7. DISCUSSION

Penang has benefitted from the transshipment activities of the Taiwanese tuna longliners. Besides accruing revenue directly from the fishing activities, several activities associated with the transshipment business have been initiated, e.g., development of milkfish farms to supply live bait for tuna longliners. These activities will increase and will continue to support the fishing operations for oceanic tuna in the Indian Ocean if the resources are sustained. Since yellowfin are reported to move extensively, it would be desirable to continue the collection of these data to examine possible interaction issues related to the yellowfin resource in the eastern Indian Ocean to support the proper management of these oceanic tuna resources.

8. REFERENCES CITED

Hsu, C.C., and H.C. Liu. 1991. Taiwanese longline and gillnet fisheries in the Indian. Paper presented at the Expert Consultation of Stock Assessment of Tunas in the Indian Ocean, 2-6 July 1990, Bangkok, Thailand. Coll. Vol. Indo-Pac. Tuna Dev. Mgt. Programme 4: 244-258.

Khoo, S.K., and P.E. Chee. 1994. A study of the Indian Ocean tuna longline fishery based in Penang, Malaysia. Proceedings of the Fisheries Research Conference, Department of Fisheries Malaysia IV: 210-218.

Lablache, G. 1991. Tuna fishing trends in the western Indian Ocean. Paper presented at the Expert Consultation of Stock Assessment of Tunas in the Indian Ocean, 2-6 July 1990. Coll. Vol. Indo-Pac. Tuna Dev. Mgt. Programme Vol. 4: 478-488.

Mohamed, Z. 1993. Penang now the top fish jetty. The Star Publications Sdn. Bhd., Penang, 22 April 1993, 16 p.

Naamin, N., and S. Bahar. 1994. Interaction in the yellowfin tuna fisheries of the eastern part of the Indonesian waters. In: Shomura, R.S., J. Majkowski and S. Langi (eds.). Interactions of Pacific tuna fisheries. Proceedings of the First FAO Expert Consultation on Interactions of Pacific Tuna Fisheries, 3-11 December 1991, Noumea, New Caledonia. Vol. 1: Summary report and papers on interaction. FAO Fish. Tech. Pap. (336/1): 199-212.

Putro, S. 1990. Handling and processing of tuna for sashimi. INFOFISH Technical Handbook 1. 26 p.


Previous Page Top of Page Next Page