Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


CHAPTER 8 - PRICES AND PROFITABILITY OF FERTILIZERS


Prices of mineral fertilizers

Since the beginning of the 1990s, when Brazil implemented a fourth process of trade liberalization, trade barriers for the Brazilian fertilizer industry, including barriers concerning raw materials, have been very small. As a result, the domestic market prices of straight fertilizers and their raw materials became comparable with those of imported products (Table 18).

Data on the average prices of fertilizers (US$ per tonne) in Brazil for the period of 1993 to 2002 (Table 19) indicate that for all fertilizers the average prices for 2002 are below those practiced in 1993 and considerably lower than those observed in 1996, a year when prices of fertilizers reached the highest level of the recent years. It has been observed that the final price of fertilizers to the farmers is now closely related to the prices of imported fertilizers.

Prices of agricultural products

The prices of agricultural products are influenced partly by international prices and partly by the country’s own supply and demand balance.

Exported products such as cotton, coffee, citrus, soybeans and wheat are strongly influenced by international prices. The prices of basic food products such as rice, potato, common beans, and maize are influenced much more by internal factors. Sugar cane prices are influenced by the international sugar market and by the domestic alcohol market.

TABLE 18
International fertilizer price indices1

Product

1993
US$/t

1993

1996

1998
Indices

2000

2002

Ammonium sulphate

78

100

145

88

97

105

Urea

119

100

153

97

113

101

Triple superphosphate

130

100

146

152

115

108

Monoammonium

144

100

163

164

123

119

phosphate







KCl

122

100

120

124

119

109

Average

118.60

100

145

125

113

108

1 Average international prices (C&F). Indices of relative prices, 1993 = 100

Source: ANDA, 2003.

TABLE 19
Prices indices of some fertilizers in Brazil

Product

1993
US$/t

1993

1996

1998
Indices

2000

2002

NPK compound







2-20-201

164

100

139

121

109

96

4-14-82

128

100

135

119

109

96

4-20-203

170

100

138

120

108

95

5-25-154

178

100

144

124

110

99

12-6-125

141

100

143

114

106

96

20-5-206

178

100

147

108

103

90

Amm. sulphate

136

100

147

99

94

94

Urea

200

100

170

93

92

83

Average

161

100

145

112

104

94

Compound fertilizer used on:

1 Soybean
2 Potatoes and common beans
3 Cotton, maize and wheat
4 Rice
5 Citrus
6 Coffee
Source: ANDA, 2003.

TABLE 20
Agricultural product prices

Product

1993

1993

1996

1998

2000

2002


US$ per unit of product1

Cotton

5.16

7.30

6.52

5.23

3.94

3.63

Rice

9.72

12.34

14.84

8.24

7.52

8.07

Potato

12.03

16.15

21.07

12.36

14.60

10.66

Coffee

63.94

126.13

134.80

84.74

47.49

40.29

Sugar cane

9.74

15.08

14.58

10.17

10.82

9.26

Common beans

30.33

36.50

53.79

20.22

24.21

23.84

Oranges

2.59

3.28

4.35

2.15

3.30

3.44

Maize

6.90

8.66

7.41

6.63

4.16

5.30

Soybeans

10.65

13.87

11.66

9.38

9.01

10.13

Wheat

7.40

11.26

7.93

7.08

6.42

7.52

1 The “units of product” area as follows:
Cotton: 15 kg
Rice, potato, coffee, beans, maize, soybeans and wheat: 60 kg bag
Oranges: 40.8 kg box

Sugar cane: tonne

The prices of basic food products have been constrained by the inflation control policies practiced by the Federal Government since 1994. The data in Table 20 indicate that the average prices for the great majority of the Brazilian agricultural products, apart from oranges and wheat, fell during the period of 1993 to 2002.

As shown in Table 21, the quantity of agricultural products needed to buy one tonne of fertilizer was similar in 1993 and 2002 in the cases of sugar cane and soybeans. It declined in the case of oranges and increased in the cases of cotton, rice, potato, coffee, beans and maize.

Profitability of fertilizer use

In general, the profitability of fertilizer use in Brazil has been influenced much more by variations in the prices of the agricultural products than variations in the prices of fertilizers. For the great majority of crops shown in Table 22, the cost of fertilization per ha during the past five years has remained reasonably constant. However the share of fertilization costs in relation to the total income per ha increased substantially due to falls in income.

TABLE 21
Units of products required to buy one tonne of fertilizer

Product

1993

1996

1998

2000

2001

2002


US$ per unit of product1

Cotton

31.2

31.0

28.6

32.5

42.0

42.3

Rice

18.7

22.1

14.4

23.3

24.2

21.3

Potato

10.6

10.7

7.2

11.4

9.2

11.6

Coffee

2.8

2.1

1.4

2.2

3.7

4.0

Sugar cane

18.4

17.4

14.4

18.9

17.2

18.4

Common beans

4.2

4.9

2.8

6.9

5.6

5.2

Oranges

54.2

61.2

37.0

69.4

45.5

39.3

Maize

25.7

30.2

26.8

27.7

42.1

30.8

Soybeans

15.4

16.4

16.9

18.9

18.8

15.6

Wheat

23.0

20.9

25.7

26.0

27.1

21.5

1 See footnote Table 20.

TABLE 22
Expenditure on fertilizers1 as a proportion of farm income2 Centre-South region

Crop

US$/ha

1998

2000

2002

Average
1998/2002

Cotton

Income

1 630

1 308

908

1 205

Fertilizers

119

108

99

108

Proportion

7.3%

8.3%

10.9%

9.0%

Rice

Income

965

536

525

626

Fertilizers

80

72

66

72

Proportion

8.3%

13.4%

12.6%

11.5%

Sugar cane

Income

1 166

814

741

851

Fertilizers

97

90

80

89

Proportion

8.3%

11.1%

10.8%

10.4%

Beans

Income

1 883

708

1 883

1 244

Fertilizers

89

83

89

84

Proportion

4.7%

11.7%

4.7%

6.8%

Citrus

Income

3 480

1 720

2 752

2 568

Fertilizers

113

104

95

103

Proportion

3.2%

6.0%

3.5%

4.0%

Maize

Income

519

464

371

408

Fertilizers

103

96

87

95

Proportion

19.9%

20.7%

23.5%

23.2%

Soybeans

Income

490

394

426

410

Fertilizers

49

44

39

44

Proportion

10.0%

11.2%

9.2%

10.7%

Wheat

Income

333

297

316

298

Fertilizers

51

46

41

46

Proportion

15.3%

15.5%

13.0%

15.4%

Coffee

Income

2 696

1 695

806

1 913

Fertilizers

154

147

129

141

Proportion

5.7%

8.7%

16.0%

7.4%

1 Farm income: price received by the farmer multiplied by the average yield per ha.

2 Fertilizer cost: average annual price paid by the farmer multiplied by the quantity applied on the crop.

Source: ANDA, 2003.


Previous Page Top of Page Next Page