INS/81/008/TECHNICAL PAPER/13DECEMBER 1989
Cover
THE FOOD AND FEEDING OF SEABASS Lates calcarifer GROUPER Epinephelus tauvina AND RABBITFISH Siganus NATIONAL SEAFARMING DEVELOPMENT CENTRE LAMPUNG, INDONESIA
CONTENTS


By

Albert G.J. Tacon

Feed and Nutrition Advisor
FAO/UNDP Seafarming Development Project INS/81/008

and

Nur Rausin
Muhammad Kadari
Nico Runtuboy
Astuti
Warsono
Suyanto
Bambang Purwanto
Sunaryat


Project Document Identification

Part II F. Activities

Prepare seafarming manuals and other technical information



This report was prepared during the course of the project identified on the title page. Any mention of companies and their products does not imply endorsement. The designation employed and presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and UNDP concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area of its authorities or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.

PREPARATION OF THIS DOCUMENT

This report is based on the cage fish feeding trials conducted by Dr. Albert G.J. Tacon, INS/81/008 Feed and Nutrition Advisor, between 7 December 1988 and 31 December 1989 and is a continuation of the INS/81/008 feed development programme initiated by Professor Samuel P. Meyers, Feed and Nutrition Consultant. For full details of the activities of professor Meyers see INS/81/008/GENERAL REPORT/1 (Feed formulation, equipment and training in Indonesia; Meyers, S.P., 1987), INS/81/008/GENERAL REPORT/5 (A summary follow-up report for the Seafarming Project INS/81/008 at Teluk Hurun, Lampung, Sumatra, Indonesia; Meyers, S.P., 1987), INS/81/008/WORKING PAPER/7 (Considerations in feed development with emphasis on fish nutrition; Meyers, S.P., 1986), INS/81/008/MANUAL/10 (Instruction manual on feed equipment use and aquatic feed manufacture; Meyers, S.P., 1986) and INS/81/008/TECHNICAL PAPER/5 (Observations on the growth and survival of rabbitfish Siganus canaliculatus on three formulated diets; Meyers et al. 1989).

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to thank Dr. Banchong Tiensongrusmee (INS/81/008 Chief Technical Advisor) and Mr. Kisto Mintardjo (INS/81/008 Project Co-Team Leader) for their constant encouragement and support. Appreciation is also extended for the technical support given by the staff of the National Seafarming Development Centre, including Mr. Murdjani, Mr. Hartono, Mr. Bambang Rahardjo, Mr. Aji, Ms. Nirasari, Mr. Oyon, Mr. Ruslan, Ms. Muawanah and Mr. Memet. Materials used during the feeding trials were donated by P.T. Charoen Pokphand Indonesia Animal Feedmill Co., Lt. (fish meal, soybean meal, squid liver powder, shrimp head meal, zeolite, fish oil, soybean oil, rice bran, wheat pollards, wheat flour, wheat gluten, AGJT/F1 vitamin premix, chicken broiler starter diet No. 511, carp starter diet No. 788), P.T. Agro Utama Corporation (shrimp finisher pellet No. 588), P.T. Rosindo husada pratama (choline chloride), P.T. Jaka Utama Kraftfutter (soy lecithin), Lysi HF (fish liver oil) and P> T > Astabumi Ciptadaya (Suehiro UGF). Particular thanks are extended to Dr. Ken Hazen (Area Manager Feed Research and Development) of P.T Charoen Pokphand Indonesia Animal Feedmill for his technical support and assistance in undertaking the chemical analyses of the dietary feed ingredients, diets and fish carcasses. Finally, special thanks must also be given to Mr. Peter Cornelis (visiting research scientist) for his valuable assistance during the cage feeding trials.

ABSTRACT

Four cage feeding trials involving a total of fifteen different dietary feeding regimes were conducted with seabass (Lates calcarifer), grouper (Epinephelus tauvina) and rabbitfish (Siganus canaliculatus) from fingerling to market size over a 100 to 156-day rearing period. Seabass fed frozen fish or a moist pellet displayed the best growth response, with fish (30/m3) growing from an initial weight of 8.9g and 8.5g to a final weight of 285.5g and 257.5g in 156 days, with a food conversion ratio of 3.77 – 5.10 (dry matter basis 0.96 – 1.30) and 1.89 – 3.20 (dry matter basis 1.15 – 1.95), and with a survival of 93.3% and 93.3%, respectively. During the seabass trial the estimated feeding cost/kg fish produced was Rp 1458 – 1964 and Rp 1537 – 2584 for fish fed frozen fish and moist pellet, respectively. Grouper fed frozen fish and moist pellet also displayed the best growth response, with fish (30/m3) growing from an initial weight of 23.8g and 25.8g to a final weight of 471.7g and 388.7g in 156 days, with a food conversion ratio of 3.53 – 4.16 (dry matter basis 0.89 – 1.06) and 1.73 – 2.96 (dry matter basis 1.06 – 1.80), and with a survival of 90% and 98.3%, respectively. During the grouper trial the estimated feeding cost/kg fish produced was Rp 1342 – 1603 and Rp 1382 – 2396 for fish fed frozen fish and moist pellet, respectively. In the case of rabbitfish, the best growth was observed for fish fed a dry in-house crumble containing 31% crude protein; fish (15/m3) growing from an initial weight of 51.7g to a final weight of only 110.3g in 100 days, with a food conversion ratio of 3.48 (dry matter basis 3.08) and estimated feeding cost/kg fish produced of Rp 2349. However, all rabbitfish fed formulated rations displayed marked sexual activity by the end of the feeding trial (62 – 93% of the fish yielding milt or eggs on hand stripping). Finally, a fourth cage culture trial was conducted to ascertain the possible use of kerosene pressure lamps and generator powered fluorescent strip lights at night to attract live food fish directly into net cages containing juvenile seabass and grouper, with no use of exogenous dietary feeds. A positive growth response was observed with seabass and to a lesser extent with grouper with increasing net mesh size and decreasing fish stocking density; seabass juveniles at the lowest tested density of 10 fish/m3 displaying a final mean weight gain of - 15.96%, 3.63% and 52.04% within 1mm, 13mm and 19mm mesh cages over a 63 day culture period, respectively. Fuel cost per night (1800h - 0600h) ranged from Rp 1925 for the fluorescent strip lights to Rp 3360 for the kerosene pressure lamps.

National Counterpart Staff
National Seafarming Development Centre
Directorate General of Fisheries
P.O.Box 74/TK Teluk Betung 35401
Lampung, Indonesia


Hyperlinks to non-FAO Internet sites do not imply any official endorsement of or responsibility for the opinions, ideas, data or products presented at these locations, or guarantee the validity of the information provided. The sole purpose of links to non-FAO sites is to indicate further information available on related topics.

This electronic document has been scanned using optical character recognition (OCR) software. FAO declines all responsibility for any discrepancies that may exist between the present document and its original printed version.


CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION

2. RABBITFISH CAGE CULTURE TRIAL

2.1 Aim of cage feeding trial
2.2 Materials and methods

2.2.1 Diets
2.2.2 Experimental procedure
2.2.3 Chemical methods
2.2.4 Statistical methods

2.3 Results

2.3.1 Growth response
2.3.2 Feed intake
2.3.3 Feed utilization
2.3.4 Carcass composition
2.3.5 Sexual status
2.3.6 Fish production, survival and feeding cost

2.4 Discussion

3. SEABASS CAGE CULTURE TRIAL

3.1 Aim of cage feeding trial
3.2 Materials and methods

3.2.1 Diets
3.2.2 Experimental procedure
3.2.3 Chemical and statistical methods

3.3 Results: Day 0 to Day 100

3.3.1 Growth response
3.3.2 Feed intake
3.3.3 Feed utilization
3.3.4 Carcass composition
3.3.5 Mortality record and survival
3.3.6 Fish production and feeding cost

3.4 Results: Day 100 to Day 156 and Day 0 to Day 156

3.4.1 Growth response and feed intake
3.4.2 Feed utilization
3.4.3 Carcass composition, fish production and feeding cost

3.5 Discussion

4. GROUPER CAGE CULTURE TRIAL

4.1 Aim of cage feeding trial
4.2 Materials and methods

4.2.1 Diets
4.2.2 Experimental procedure
4.2.3 Chemical and statistical methods

4.3 Results: Day 0 to Day 100

4.3.1 Growth response
4.3.2 Feed intake
4.3.3 Feed utilization
4.3.4 Carcass composition
4.3.5 Mortality record and survival
4.3.6 Fish production and feeding cost

4.4 Results: Day 100 to Day 156 and Day 0 to Day 156

4.4.1 Growth response and feed intake
4.4.2 Feed utilization
4.4.3 Carcass composition, fish production and feeding cost

4.5 Discussion

5.0 NIGHT LIGHT CAGE FEEDING TRIAL

5.1 Aim of cage feeding trial
5.2 Materials and methods

5.2.1 Experimental procedure

5.3 Results

5.3.1 Light feeding response
5.3.2 Growth response
5.3.3 Lamp maintenance and fuel cost

5.4 Discussion

6.0 REFERENCES

7.0 APPENDIX 1

LIST OF TABLES

Table

1 Proximate chemical composition of the feed ingredient source used in the dietary formulations

2 Formulation, proximate chemical composition and cost of the rabbit fish test diets

3 Growth performance of rabbit fish from day 0 to day 100

4 Feed intake and diet utilization efficiency of rabbit fish from day 0 to day 100

5 Carcass composition of rabbit fish at the start and end of the 100 day feeding trial

6 Sexual activity of rabbit fish at the end of the 100 day feeding trial

7 Overall cage production and survival of rabbit fish from day 0 to day 100

8 Formulation, proximate chemical composition and cost of the seabass test diets

9 Growth performance of seabass from day 0 to day 100

10 Feed intake and diet utilization efficiency of seabass from day 0 to day 100

11 Carcass composition of seabass at the start and end of the 100 day feeding trial

12 Mortality record and survival of seabass from day 0 to day 100

13 Overall cage production of seabass from day 0 to day 100

14 Growth performance of seabass from day 100 to day 156

15 Overall growth response of seabass from day 0 to day 156

16 Feed intake and diet utilization efficiency of seabass from day 100 to day 156

17 Carcass composition of seabass fed frozen fish and moist pellet after 0, 100 and 156 days

18 Overall cage production of seabass from day 100 to day 156

19 Formulation, proximate chemical composition and cost of the grouper test diets

20 Growth performance of grouper from day 0 to day 100

21 Feed intake and diet utilization efficiency of grouper from day 0 to day 100

22 Carcass composition of grouper at the start and end of the 100 day feeding trial

23 Mortality record and survival of grouper from day 0 to day 100

24 Overall cage production of grouper from day 0 to day 100

25 Growth performance of grouper from day 100 to day 156

26 Overall growth response of grouper from day 0 to day 156

27 Feed intake and diet utilization efficiency of grouper from day 100 to day 156

28 Carcass composition of grouper fed frozen fish and moist pellet after 0, 100 and 156 days

29 Overall cage production of grouper from day 100 to day 156

30 Body weight and growth of seabass and grouper over the 63-day light feeding trial

31 Percent body weight gain or loss of seabass and grouper over the 63-day light feeding trial

32 Survival of seabass and grouper over the 63-day light feeding trial

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure

1 Map of Indonesia and location of major cities and National Seafarming Development Centre and Sub-centres

2 INS/81/008 feed preparation laboratory

3 INS/81/008 diet drying cabinet

4 Diagrammatic representation of a 6 × 6m floating raft used for housing the experimental cages for the fish feeding trials at the National Seafarming Development Centre in Hanura, Teluk Hurun, Bandar Lampung

5 Water quality within the experimental cages over the 100 day feeding trial

6 Growth response of rabbit fish over the 100 day feeding trial

7 Daily feed intake of rabbit fish fed frozen fish and a broiler starter ration from day 0 to day 100

8 Daily feed intake of rabbit fish fed carp starter diet and RD1 ration from day 0 to day 100

9 Daily feed intake of rabbit fish fed the RD2 ration from day 0 to day 100

10 Relationship between percentage daily feed intake and body weight of rabbit fish fed frozen fish and broiler starter diet from day 0 to day 100

11 Relationship between percentage daily food intake and body weight of rabbit fish fed carp starter diet and RD1 pellet from day 0 to day 100

12 Relationship between percentage daily food intake and body weight of rabbit fish fed RD2 pellet from day 0 to day 100

13 Body weight range of rabbit fish after 100 days

14 Reconstructed growth curve for rabbitfish (S. canaliculatus) fed artificial formulated diet within floating net cages at the National Seafarming Development Centre in Teluk Hurun based on past cage culture trials

15 Growth of rabbitfish fed a moist pelleted diet (1:1, carp feed: trash fish mixture) in floating net cages at the Bojonegara Experimental Station, Serang, Indonesia (Yoshimitsu, Eda and Hiramatsu, 1986)

16 Water quality within the experimental cages over the 156-day feeding trial

17 Growth response of seabass after 100 days

18 Body weight range of seabass after 100 days

19 Daily feed intake of seabass fed frozen fish and a moist pellet ration from day 0 to day 100

20 Daily feed intake of seabass fed shrimp finisher pellet and RD1 pellet from day 0 to day 100

21 Daily feed intake of seabass fed RD2 pellet from day 0 to day 100

22 Relationship between percentage daily food intake and body weight of seabass from day 0 to day 100

23 Relationship between percentage daily food intake and body weight of seabass from day 0 to day 100

24 Relationship between percentage daily food intake and body weight of seabass from day 0 to day 100

25 Survival curve of seabass from day 0 to day 100

26 Growth performance of seabass after 156 days

27 Daily feed intake of seabass fed a frozen fish diet from day 0 to day 156

28 Daily feed intake of seabass fed a moist pellet ration from day 0 to day 156

29 Relationship between percentage daily food intake (as fed basis) and body weight of seabass from day 0 to day 156

30 Relationship between percentage daily dry matter food intake and body weight of seabass from day 0 to day 156

31 Body weight range of seabass after 156 days

32 Food conversion ratio of seabass over the course of the 156-day feeding trial

33 Reconstructed growth curve for seabass fed a frozen fish ration within floating net cages at the National Seafarming Development Centre in Teluk Hurun based on past cage culture trials and the present culture trial

34 Growth response of grouper after 100 days

35 Body weight range of grouper after 100 days

36 Daily feed intake of grouper fed frozen fish and a moist pellet ration from day 0 to day 100

37 Daily feed intake of grouper fed shrimp finisher pellet and RD1 pellet from day 0 to day 100

38 Daily feed intake of grouper fed RD2 pellet from day 0 to day 100

39 Relationship between percentage daily food intake and body weight of grouper from day 0 to day 100

40 Relationship between percentage daily food intake and body weight of grouper from day 0 to day 100

41 Relationship between percentage daily food intake and body weight of grouper from day 0 to day 100

42 Survival curve of grouper from day 0 to day 100

43 Growth performance of grouper after 156 days

44 Body weight range of grouper after 156 days

45 Daily feed intake of grouper fed a frozen fish diet from day 0 to day 100

46 Daily feed intake of grouper fed a moist pellet ration from day 0 to day 156

47 Relationship be tween percentage daily food intake (as fed basis) and body weight of grouper from day 0 to day 156

48 Relationship between percentage daily dry matter food intake and body weight of grouper from day 0 to day 156

49 Food conversion ratio of grouper over the course of the 156 day feeding trial

50 Reconstructed growth curve for grouper (E. tauvina) fed a frozen fish ration within floating net cages at the National Seafarming Development Centre in Teluk Hurun based on past cage culture trials

51 Diagrammatic representation of the rafts used for the light feeding trial with seabass and grouper; all net cages 1 × 1 × 1.5m

52 Percentage weight gain of seabass with different net mesh size at four different densities

53 Percentage weight gain of grouper with different net mesh size at density of 10 fish/m3

54 Diagrammatic representation of a stationary lift net with floating rafts for finfish culture