Previous PageTable Of ContentsNext Page


T13. Non Wood Forest Products (NWFP) Removal

The information on “Non Wood Forest Products (NWFP) Removal” demonstrates the potential of forests in providing NWFP and indicates the priority NWFPs deserve in development of management strategies to conserve resources and to sustain and promote livelihoods of local and indigenous people dependent on them.

A. Global Classification and Definitions (FRA 2005)

Non Wood Forest Products Removal

Annual removal of a Non Wood Forest Product (NWFP) from “Forest” and “Other Wooded Land”.

Source: FAO. 2004. Terms and Definition FRA-2005. FRA Working paper 73. Rome

B. National Data Sources

Forestry Statistics complied and published by Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education (ICFRE) Dehradun provides basic information on removal of NWFP. It present information by individual States and Union Territories in India . However it does not provide national totals because it maintains reporting units of the States and does not covert into one units like metric tonne. For example, production of tendu leaves is reported in “standard bags” and bamboo in “running meters” and grass and fodder in “kilograms”. This global reporting table needs information in one unit “metric tonnes”. Further, period of the annual reporting is from April 1st to March 31st of next year. It covers first nine months of the starting year and next 3 months of ending year, therefore information has been dealt as belonging to the starting year. For example, the period 1st April 96 to 31st March 1997 is nationally denoted as 1996-97 and contains 9 months of 1996 and only 3 months of 1997 therefore the information has been treated as for 1996. Following publication have been used for archiving National Data.

C. National Classification and Definitions

There are no standard national definitions for NWFP. The data units were converted to metric tonnes by using conversion factors, for example, the following.

Weight of Standard bag of Bidi Leaves: 40 Kg

Canes: Kaps = 1 billet, One bundle = 50 billet, One billet = 3.65 metre, One meter = 0.5342 Kg

Resin: One blaze ( Lip & Cup Method) = 1 Kg & (Rill Method)= 3 Kg

Grass & Fodder: One bundle= 35 Kg

Bamboo: 2400 Running meter = 1 Metric Tonne

D. National Data

Year

Removal of NWFP ( in 000 metric tonnes)

Sal Seed

Bidi leave

Cane

Resin

Gum

Lac

Drug& Spice

Grass & Fodder

Tanning Material

Others

Bamboo

1987

21.29

505.53

1.61

98.32

13.82

9.11

12.05

304.49

20.22

318.44

642.38

1988

23.81

531.5

6.26

105.6

4.09

69

11.49

332.47

234

229.7

829.76

1989

54.58

556.04

42.6

117.6

1.39

1.06

18.66

119.98

22.4

68.58

1934.59

1990

N A.

N A.

N A.

N A.

N A.

5.77

26.53

102.19

20.27

N A.

660.12

1991

N A.

N A.

N A.

N A.

N A.

6.01

62.81

161.79

20.42

N A.

754.64

1992

N A.

N A.

N A.

N A.

N A.

8.28

23.33

421.62

8.39

N A.

721.34

1993

N A.

N A.

N A.

N A.

N A.

7.28

18.16

113.34

11.52

N A.

455.4

1994

18.53

542.76

65.14

88.23

21.1

9.07

21.57

74.91

10.46

10039

822.63

1995

27.62

322.16

345.4

169.2

3.04

0.1

59.78

64.06

8.35

7782.1

632.54

1996

87.51

112.25

5.02

26.02

3.56

0.08

41.21

62.98

19.06

111.91

1186.05

1997

12.58

744.35

2.1

18.34

1

0.75

62.7

418.53

4.93

197.94

3629.79

1998

57.78

384.94

18.69

14.35

2.14

0.02

N A.

213.85

N A.

69.94

1119.67

1999

78.74

400.81

2.02

0.96

2.42

0.31

N A.

45.78

N A.

165.95

1261.86

E. Calibration

Not considered necessary

F. Estimation and Forecasting

The national data shows large variation including cyclic variation in annual production figures, For Sal and Bidi first three year averages were developed and then these averages were regressed to estimate and forecast figures for 2000 and 2005. For Bamboo, the data for 1996, 1998 and 1999 was used to estimate 2000 and 2005 production figures. In case of Cane, Resin, Gum, Lac, Drug, Grass and Fodder, and Others, the variation does not allow use of regression estimate, therefore in these cases, the last data on annual production was assumed for 2000 and 2005.

G. Reclassification into FRA 2005 Classes

Table: Reclassification (Percentage allocation) into FRA 2005 classes

National Class

Percentage a National class that falls in a FRA class of NWFP

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Sal Seed

100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bidi leave

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100

Cane

 

 

 

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

Resin

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100

 

Gum

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100

 

Lac

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100

Drug& Spice

 

 

100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grass & Fodder

 

100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tanning Material

 

 

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

 

Bamboo

 

 

 

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

Others

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100

Notes

ID No

Name of Product

ID No

Name of Product

1

Food

6

Dying and Tanning & Construction material

2

Fodder

7

Utensils, Handicrafts

3

. Medicine

8

Ornamental

4

4. Medicinal Plants

9

Exudates

5

5. Perfumes

10

Others

H. National Information for FRA 2005 Global Tables

Table: Input to Global Reporting Table

FRA Class

NWFP Removal in 000 MT

 

1990

2000

2005

1

36.50

52.87

61.06

2

102.19

45.78

45.78

3

26.53

62.70

62.70

4

NA

NA

NA

5

NA

NA

NA

6

20.27

4.93

4.93

7

111.18

167.97

167.97

8

NA

NA

NA

9

118.99

3.38

3.38

10

665.89

1128.95

1313.54

Total

1081.55

1466.58

1659.36

Notes

1. For Sal and Bidi: Three year averages (due to yearly fluctuations) were regressed for 2000 and 2005 estimates

2. For Cane, Resin, Gum, Lac, Drug, Grass and Fodder, and Others: Last reported data was taken for 2000 and 2005


Previous PageTop Of PageNext Page