Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


Prioritised Activities for 1994 – 1995 and Related Budget
Item 3

By Ivan Katavic

SELECTION AND PROTECTION OF SITES SUITABLE FOR AQUACULTURE

I. Context and Background

In securing a practical approach to the site selection in the Mediterranean region, one is faced with a great diversity of current aquaculture practices in a variety of enviornmental, economic and social conditions.

By respecting these circumstances, the production system should be choosen in accordance with the site opportunities and existing and/or planned infrastructure development.

Increased use of the nearshore aquaculture environemtn for commercial and recreational activities are increasing our awareness of maintaining environmental quality for aquaculture. This forced many countries to reexamine the process of site selection and ressources allocation for aquaculture, as well as to address conflict resolution needs in coastal areas.

Within the scopes of the EAM network it is envisaged that EAM will be contributing to the protection and preservation of natural environment through specific procedures for monitoring and through the assistance in establishing environmental legislation. The basic requirement of such monitoring is to identify ecological changes, quanfity and correlate these changes with the anticipated impact of the effluent on the receiving ecosystem.

The evaluation of the impact will consider a selected number of key parameters (“indicators”) which can be specific as far the aquaculture and the site itself is concerned.

For a continuous monitoring program there is a need to consider which variables to monitor, the spatial and temporal scale of monitoring, sampling and analytical methods to be applied, and evaluation including statistical analysis of data.

II. Objectives

-   To define environmental descriptors needed for the identification of sites suitable for relevant aquaculture systems as practised in the Mediterranean region;

-   to establish an operational procedure for protection of aquaculture through harmonised environmental standards and regulations.

III. Outputs

IV. Workplan for 1994 and 1995

A. 1994

  1. Data compilation by a working group composed of 4 experts specialized in the four aquaculture production systems mentioned above.

  2. Meeting of the above working group.

  3. Preparatory field visit, for the assessment of available data and discussion with local counterparts.

  4. Field testing to other interested countries through consultants as per request.

B. 1995

  1. Four-days workshop to be attended by 15 experts to discuss and evaluate guideline for its final adoption.

  2. Follow-up : re-evaluation of guidelines based on workshop results and recommendations.

V. Budget

A. Budget for activities in 1994

Component 1 : Guidelines
1)1 Contract × 20002000USD
3 contracts × 10003000USD
 Total5000USD
2)4 Travel × 8003200USD
4 DSA (150 per day) × 31800USD
 Total5000USD
3)Component 2 : Assistance to country(ies)
 Phase 1 :
 Consultant fee: 1 × 100 × 3300USD
 1 travel × 800800USD
 DSA 3 × 150450USD
  Total1550USD

Phase 2 :

Compilation of data using draft guidelines for the preparation National contribution of inventories

Phase 3 :

Assistance to the local counterparts in finalising inventory of suitable aquaculture sites :

 10 × DSA (150) × 11500USD
Consultant fee : 100 × 10 days1000USD
1 travel × 800800USD
 Total3300USD
4)Guidelines field tested by national institution3000USD
  Total 199417850USD
B.Budget for activities in 1995
 1)Workshop
 Travel 15 × 80012000USD
 DSA 15 × 150 × 4 days9000USD
  Total21000USD
 2)Follow up (3 days)2000USD
 Compilation of final results
 Consultant fee : 3 × 100
 1 travel × 100
 3 × DSA 150
 3)Contingencies2000USD
  Total 199525000USD
 GRAND TOTAL (1994–1995)42850USD

VI. Identification of Interested Parties

These activities will be coordinated directly by te EAM network center (MAP-PAP/RAC, Split, Croatia).

Contributions, in terms of both technical assistance (in kind) and financial support, to these activites are expected from the target countries.

Initial funding for the bienniu8m 1994–1995 is expected from MEDRAP II budget as well as PAP/RAC contribution.

As regards data base, SIPAM contribution will be sollicited.


Previous Page Top of Page Next Page