6. Sources of information

6.1 References and Documents Reviewed

Aaker, J. and J. Shumaker. 1994. Looking Back and Looking Forward: Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation. Little Rock, Arkansas: Heifer International,

Ashley, C, and D. Carney. 1999. Sustainable Livelihoods: Lessons from early experience. London: Department for International Development (DFID) Issues Series.

Bartlett A., Meyer, J., Kar K., Jay A., Alam Z. and Sarker A. 2004. First Output to Purpose Review Report. CARE Rural Livelihoods Programme. February 2004. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Rural Livelihoods Evaluation Partnership.

Bartlett, A. 2002. Food for Thought: Selected Outcomes of Rural Livelihoods Projects in Bangladesh supported by DFID and CARE.

Bartlett, A. 2002a. Impact Study on FFS Activities within SHABGE-DFID Project [Draft]. Dhaka: CARE.

Bass, S. 2003. Project Document for the Community-Based Regional Development Programme, Phase II, 2004-08 (Draft). Rome: FAO.

Bass, S. 2003. Designing a pastoral risk management strategy in Mongolia: applying a sustainable livelihoods perspective. IUAES XVth Congress, Florence, Italy. Commission on Nomadic Peoples Session 7-8 July, 2003.

Baumann, P, M. Bruno, D. Cleary, O. Dubois, X. Flores. 2003. Applying People-Centred Development Approaches within FAO: Some Practical Lessons. Rome: FAO.

Baumann, P. 2002. Improving Access to Natural Resources for the Rural Poor. A Critical Analysis of Central Concepts and Emerging Trends from a Sustainable Livelihoods Perspective. Rome: FAO.

Boudreau, T. & J. Holt. 2000. A Food Economy Report on the Ruba Lomine Project Area for Oxfam Canada and REST: A Food Economy Baseline with an Analysis of Programme Implications. The Food Economy Group.

Carney, D. (ed.) 1998. Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: What contribution can we make? London: DFID.

Carney, D. Sustainable Livelihoods Approaches: Progress and possibilities for a change. London: Department for International Development (DFID).

Cleary, D. 2003. People-Centred Approaches. A Brief Literature Review and Comparison of Types. Rome: FAO.

Cotula, L. 2002. Improving Access to Natural Resources for the Rural Poor. The Experience of FAO and Other Key Organisations from a Sustainable Livelihoods Perspective. Rome: FAO.

DFID. 1999. Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets. http://www.livelihoods.org/info/info_guidancesheets.html

DFID. 2001. Proceedings of the Inter-Agency Forum on Operationalising Participatory Ways of Applying Sustainable Livelihoods Approaches, Pontignano (Sienna), 7-11 March 2000. (http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/003/X9371E/X9371E00.HTM)

Estrella, M. (Editor) Learning from Change: Issues and experiences in participatory monitoring and evaluation. 2000. With J. Blauert, D. Campilan, J. Gaventa, J. Gonsalves, I. Guijt, D. Johnson, and R. Ricafort. Intermediate Technology Publications, International Development Research Centre, London.

FAO, 2001. Asia-Pacific Conference on Early Warning Prevention Preparedness and Management of Disasters in Food and Agriculture, Chiangmai, Thailand. 12-15 June, 2001.

FAO. 2000. The Participatory Upland Conservation and Development Project in Pakistan. GCP/INT/542/ITA, 1992-1999. Case study prepared for the Inter-Agency Forum on Operationalising Participatory Ways of Applying Sustainable Livelihoods Approaches, Pontignano (Sienna), 7-11 March 2000.

FAO. 2001. Terminal Report: Interregional Project for Participatory Upland Conservation and Development, Pakistan (GCP/INT/542/ITA-PAK). Project Findings and Recommendations. FAO: Rome.

FAO. 2003a. International Summative-cum-Evaluation Workshop Report (31.12.03 Draft) Women in Irrigation and Water Resources Management for Improved Household Food Security, Nutrition and Health. December 16-18, 2003, FAO, Rome

FAO. 2003b. Report of the Seventeenth Session of the Committee on Agriculture. Rome 23-28 June, 2003.

FAO. 2004a. Livelihoods Support Program, Sub Programme 3.2: Participatory Policy Making (PPM). Summary Case Study. Lempira Sur Rural Development Projects, March 2004

FAO. 2002. Empowerment of Women in Irrigation and Water Resources Management for Improved Household Food Security, Nutrition and Health (WIN Project) GCP/INT/FIP. (19 December 2002 Draft for Discussion). WIN Reformulation Workshop Proceedings, December 10-12, 2002, FAO Rome

FAO. 2003c. SD: TCP/MON/0066 Technical Cooperation Programme. Pastoral Risk Management Strategy, Mongolia. Terminal statement prepared for the Government of Mongolia by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 2003

FAO. 2004b. FAO Progress Report, Trust Fund Programme. 2003 Annual Report (KE Draft 08.01.04) United Nations Foundation GCP/INT/750/FIP, Empowerment of Women in Irrigation and Water Resources Management for Improved Food Security, Nutrition, and Health.

Frankenberger, T. 2000. What Indicators can be used for Impact Assessment? Inter-Agency Forum on Operationalising Participatory Ways of Applying Sustainable Livelihoods Approaches, Pontignano (Sienna), 7-11 March 2000.

Franks, T., A. Toner, I. Goldman, D. Howlett, F. Kamuzora, F. Muhumuza, T. Tamasane. 2004. Goodbye to Projects? The Institutional Impact of Sustainable Livelihoods Approaches on Development Interventions. Department for International Development

Gotts, K. (ed). 1998. Ruba Lomine Integrated Rural Development Programme. A Joint Evaluation Report Prepared for Oxfam Canada and the Relief Society of Tigray (REST). March 1998.

Human Development Index. [http://www.unhchr.ch/development/poverty-02.html].

Hussain, K. 2002. Livelihoods Approaches Compared: A Multi-Agency Review of Current Practice. [http://www.livelihoods.org/info/docs/LAC.pdf].

IMM Ltd. 2004. Poverty Impact Assessment Guide. [http://www.ex.ac.uk/imm/].

Lama, K. A Model of Exemplary Collaboration in Khari Tole, Tikha VDC of Doti District. 2002. Process of project implementation of "Empowerment of Women in Irrigation and Water Resources Management for Improved Food Security, Nutrition and Health" supported by UNF/FAO (GCP/INT/750/FIP)

Noble, R. 2003. Collaborative Learning to Achieve Sustainable Livelihoods. A Final Evaluation Report of the Ruba Lomine Integrated Rural Development Programme. [http://www.livelihoods.org/lessons/docs/OxfamEval.pdf].

Norton, A. and M. Foster. 2001. The potential for using sustainable livelihoods approaches in poverty reduction strategy papers. Final Report. March 2001. London: ODI.

Oxfam Canada/REST. 1998. Ruba Lomine Integrated Rural Development Programme. Phase II Proposal.

Oxfam Canada/REST. 2000. Ruba Lomine Integrated Rural Development Programme. Programme Implementation Plan, December 1, 1999 to November, 2002.

Oxfam Canada/REST. 2001. Ruba Lomine Integrated Rural Development Programme, Phase II. Annual Report, December 1, 1999 to March 31, 2001.

Oxfam Canada/REST. 2003. Ruba Lomine Integrated Rural Development Programme, Phase II. Final Report, December 1999-March 2003.

Pandey, A. with K.K. Shrestha, N.D. Pandey, P. Bhattarai, T. Pradhan, K. Lama. Report of the WIN Nepal National Summative Self Assessment Workshop on the Empowerment of Women in Irrigation for Improved Household Food Security, Nutrition, and Health (WIN) Project of FAO.

Rathberger, E. 2003. Dry Taps: Gender and Poverty in Water Resource Management. FAO: Rome. [http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/005/AC855E/ac855e00.htm#Contents].

REST. 2002. Ruba Lomine Integrated Development Programme. Annual Report on Labour Poor Female Headed Households, November 2001 to October 30, 2002.

Savory, A. with J. Butterfield. 1999. Holistic Management: A new framework for decision making. New York: Island Press.

UNDP. 2003. Community-Based Regional Development Programme. Participatory Impact Trends Assessment, Al-Makha. Sana’a: UNDP.

UNDP. 2003. Impact Assessment Report on the Community-Based Regional Development Programme, Yemen (Draft). Sana’a: UNDP.

Wilson, P. & Z. Hussain. 2002. CARE SHABGE-DFID Partnership Review. Dhaka: CARE.

6.2 Contacts and Interviews

The following persons were engaged in various capacities at different stages of the paper. The core FAO study team were closely involved in selecting projects and in developing principles, hypothesis and indicators by which to analyse and evaluate them. The extended FAO study team took part in brainstorming sessions in the initial stages of the project designed to develop and categorise principles according to their importance to the SLA, and to elaborate a set of hypotheses to allow the consultants to analyse and evaluate case studies. Workshop participants provided valuable input on the progress of the paper so far and suggested areas for further study. Interviewees were contacted in order to gain more in-depth information on projects they had worked on, to review case study summaries compiled by the consultants, and to seek other case studies of potential relevance to the study.

We wish to thank all those who took the time to speak or write to us, or to attend brainstorming sessions and workshops, and for the important contributions they have made to this paper.

Core FAO Study Team

Extended FAO Study Team (in addition to core study team)

Workshop Participants, 14^th April 2004 (in addition to core study team)

Interviews

E-Mail Exchange

6.3 ACRONYMS