Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


CONSIDERATION OF THE DRAFT CODE OF PRACTICE ON GOOD ANIMAL FEEDING[24] (Agenda Item 4d)

45. The 22nd Session of the Commission (July 1997) noted the outcome of the FAO Expert Consultation on Animal Feeding and Food Safety[25] and agreed[26] that the Draft Code of Practice for Good Animal Feeding should be referred to the CCRVDF and other Codex committees for consideration, with the coordinating role taken by the Executive Committee. Discussions held at the Codex Committees on Food Hygiene (October 1997), Food Additives and Contaminants (March 1998) and Pesticide Residues (April 1998) were summarized in document CX/RVDF 98/5; discussions held at the 45th Session of the Executive Committee were summarized in document CX/RVDF 98/2-Add. 1.

46. The representative of FAO, Dr. J. Paakkanen, highlighted the conclusions of the Consultation, and noted that most recommendations of the meeting were already incorporated into the draft Code of Practice.

47. In discussing the report and recommendations of the Consultation, the Committee identified several issues which might require further attention, specifically:

48. With regard to medicated feed, some delegations suggested the inclusion of appropriate antimicrobial resistance-related recommendations of the Report of the WHO Meeting on the Medical Impact of the Use of Antimicrobial Drugs in Food Animals (Berlin, 13-17 October 1997)[27] and other consultations addressing this issue. The Committee expressed divergent opinions as to the use of antibiotics in medicated feeds, including substances used for growth promotion, and a final decision was not reached. With regard to treatment and/or exclusion of specific types of components in animal feed, some delegations suggested the inclusion of more specific recommendations relating to transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) as made by expert Consultations addressing this issue (also see paras. 14-16). It was also suggested that the Executive Committee should clearly identify the role of each Codex committee, or assign the continued consideration of the Code to one specific Committee.

49. The Committee agreed to refer the above discussions and suggestions to the Executive Committee for its consideration.


[24] CX/RVDF 98/5 and comments from Australia, the United Kingdom, the United States (CX/RVDF 98/5-Add. 1), Sweden and Consumers International (CRD 4).
[25] FAO Expert Consultation on Animal Feeding and Food Safety, FAO Food and Nutrition Paper 69.
[26] ALINORM 97/37, para. 129.
[27] WHO/EMC/ZOO/97.4

Previous Page Top of Page Next Page