Literature on applying the logframe approach to research is rather rare. The authors would welcome any additional information which could be included in a revised edition of this paper. In the following, a number of titles have been listed which may be useful to readers who are interested in exploring various applications as well as pro-and-con discussions. It may be useful to repeat at this place: different organisations use a different terminology while still adhering to logframe thinking. Logframe terms are conventions and thus must be clearly defined for the system/organisation in which they are used. As long as we agree to respect this convention within a given organisation, differences in terminology do not pose problems.
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (1993): Project Cycle Management - Integrated Approach and Logical Framework
CORDINGLEY, D. (1995): Integrating the logical framework into the management of technical co-operation projects; Project Appraisal 10 (2), 103-112
DANIDA (1990): Logical Framework Approach for project preparation: Handbook on Logical Framework Approach (2 Volumes); Copenhagen
EGGERS, H. (1994): Integrated Project Cycle Management - Roots and Perspectives; Project Appraisal 9 (1), 159-65
FORSTER, R. ed. (1996): ZOPP marries PRA; GTZ Eschborn
GASPER, D. (1997): Logical Frameworks - A critical Assessment; Working Paper No. 264, Institute of Social Studies, The Hague
GTZ (1996): Project Cycle Management (PCM) and Objectives-Oriented Project Planning (ZOPP) - Guidelines; Eschborn
GTZ (1997): ZOPP - Objectives-Oriented Project Planning; Eschborn
NORAD (1990): The Logical Framework Approach (LFA) - Handbook for Objectives-Oriented Project Planning; Oslo
SCHUBERT, Bernd, NAGEL, Uwe Jens, DENNING, Glenn L. and PINGALI, Prabhu L (1991): A Logical Framework for Planning Agricultural Research Programs, International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Philippines
SIDA (1996): Guidelines for the Application of LFA in project Cycle Management; Stockholm
WIGGINS, S. & SHIELDS, D. (1995): Clarifying the Logical Framework. Project Appraisal 10 (1), 2-12