Table 1: Mixed Farming Systems Integrating Crops and Livestock
|
Mixed Farming System |
Agro-Ecological Classification |
Ruminant Livestock (%) |
Regions |
Important Crops |
Livestock Species and Uses |
Typical Examples |
|
|
1. Rainfed temperate/tropical highlands. |
One or more months with mean monthly temperature, corrected at
sea-level below 5°C (temperate). |
Cattle |
40 |
Sub-Saharan Africa (East African Highlands). Northeast Asia. Central/South America (Andean zone). North America and Europe. |
Maize, wheat, barley, oats, buckwheat, finger-millet, upland
rice, teff, lentils, chick-peas, beans, ensete, potatoes, sweet potatoes, taro,
yams, tomatoes, onions, cabbage, coffee, tea, pyrethrum, cardamon,
plantains. |
Cattle, buffalo, sheep, goats, camelids, poultry, pigs. Draught animal power, meat, milk, eggs, hides and skins, wool,
manure. |
Includes smallholder systems of Northern China and the
Ethiopian highlands; the family farmers of Central and Northern Europe and North
America; and the highlands of Central and South America with traditional ley
farming systems based on potatoes, barley and pastures. |
|
2. Rainfed humid/sub- |
Length of growing period > 270 days (humid), 180-270 days
(sub-humid). |
Cattle |
54 |
Central/South America. Asia. Sub-Saharan Africa. Southern USA. |
Maize, millet, sorghum, upland rice, ground-nuts, soyabeans,
peas, beans, taro, yams, coco-yams, cassava, potatoes, sweet potatoes, bananas,
plantains, tea, coffee, cotton, sugarcane, avocados, cashew, mangos, citrus,
pineapples, cocoa, oil-palm, coconuts, rubber. |
Cattle, buffalo, sheep, goats, poultry, pigs. Milk, meat, eggs, draught animal power, manure. |
Includes rice-buffalo systems of South-East Asia and the
soyabean-maize-pasture systems of the central savannas of Brazil. |
|
3. Arid/semi- |
Length of growing period < 75 days (arid), 75-180 days
(semi-arid). |
Cattle |
30 |
Asia (India). West Asia/North Africa. Sub-Saharan Africa (Sahel). South America (NE Brazil). |
Millet, sorghum, maize, oats, wheat, barley, cowpea,
groundnuts, lentils, chickpeas, vetch, cassava, tobacco, cotton, okra, sesame,
citrus, melons. |
Cattle, sheep, goats, camels, poultry, pigs. Meat, milk, eggs, draught animal power, wool. |
Includes the dryland farming- |
|
4. Irrigated temperate/ |
One or more months with mean monthly temperature corrected at
sea-level below 5°C (temperate). |
Cattle |
26 |
Mediterranean (Portugal, Italy, Greece, Albania, Bulgaria). Asia (Korea, Japan, China). |
Olives, hazelnuts, cork, potatoes, barley, tomatoes, maize,
rice, peppers, lettuce, beans, cabbage, onions, peas, wheat, plums, pears,
peaches, apples, citrus. |
Cattle, buffalo, sheep, goats, poultry, pigs. Milk, meat, eggs, wool, manure. |
Includes Southern European family farms combining irrigated
cropping with livestock production based on the grazing of drylands, crop
stubbles and some irrigated alfalfa. Asian farming systems are based mainly on
irrigated rice and dairy cattle. |
|
5. Irrigated humid/sub- |
Length of growing period > 270 days (humid), 180-270 days
(sub-humid). |
Cattle |
41 |
Asia. Central/South America. |
Irrigated rice, dryland rice, maize, mung beans, beans,
groundnuts, soyabeans, sugar-cane, cassava, sweet potatoes, kenaf, bananas,
pawpaws, coconuts. Winter crops of wheat, cabbage, seed rape. |
Cattle, buffalo, sheep, goats, poultry, pigs. Draught animal power, milk, meat, eggs. |
Includes irrigated rice-buffalo systems of South-East
Asia. |
|
6. Irrigated arid/semi- |
Length of growing period < 75 days (arid), 75-180 days
(semi-arid). |
Cattle |
28 |
South Asia. West Asia/North Africa. Central America. Western USA. |
Irrigated sorghum, wheat, rice, maize, groundnuts, cotton,
sugarcane. |
Cattle, buffalo, sheep, goats, poultry, pigs. Draught animal power, milk, meat, eggs, wool. |
Includes lucerne - maize based intensive dairy systems in
California, Israel, Mexico; small-scale buffalo milk production in Pakistan; and
animal traction-based cash crop production in Egypt and Afghanistan. |
|
|
Nutrient Yield (kg/ha/year) |
||||
|
Legume |
N |
P |
K |
Ca |
Mg |
|
Gliricidia |
169 |
11 |
149 |
66 |
17 |
|
Leucaena |
247 |
19 |
185 |
98 |
16 |
SOURCE: Modified from KANG et al. (1990)TABLE 3: COMPARISON OF USE OF LEUCAENA PRUNINGS AS GREEN MANURE (RETENTION) Vs THEIR REMOVAL ON SOIL (0-15 cm) PROPERTIES AFTER 6 YEARS OF ALLEY FARMING MAIZE AND COWPEA WITH LEUCAENA.
|
Leucaena Prunings |
pH (H2O) |
Organic Carbon |
Exchangeable Cations (c molec/kg) |
||
|
K |
Ca |
Mg |
|||
|
Removed |
6 |
6.5 |
0.19 |
2.9 |
0.35 |
|
Retained |
6 |
10.7 |
0.28 |
3.45 |
0.5 |
SOURCE: Modified from KANG et al. (1990)TABLE 4: CHANGES IN THE CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SURFACE SOIL (0-15 cm DEPTH) ON LEUCAENA AND GLIRICIDIA ALLEY-FARMS AS AFFECTED BY MULCH APPLICATION AFTER THREE YEARS OF CULTIVATION (MEAN OF FOUR FARMS).
|
Mulch Applied |
pH (H2O) |
Soil Characteristics |
Available P |
||
|
% |
kg/ha |
Organic Carbon |
Total N |
||
|
0 |
0 |
5.3 |
0.7 |
0.078 |
9.4 |
|
50 |
3.88 |
5.4 |
0.87 |
0.082 |
14.3 |
|
100 |
7.89 |
5.4 |
0.99 |
0.097 |
19.7 |
SOURCE: Modified from LARBI et al. (1993)TABLE 5: A SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL POSITIVE IMPACTS OF CROP-LIVESTOCK INTERACTIONS ON ENVIRONMENT.
|
POTENTIAL POSITIVE IMPACTS 1. Animal traction for undertaking soil conservation practices and for savings on fossil fuel use. 2. Use of leys containing grasses and legumes in rotation with arable crops to improve soil fertility. 3. Manure and urine for use as fertiliser to enhance soil fertility and for fuels to reduce cutting of trees. 4. Cash from livestock and their products to increase farm incomes and for the purchase of soil fertility-enhancing inputs such as fertilisers. 5. Crop residues for livestock feed to reduce grazing pressure
on rangeland or for use as mulch to enhance soil fertility. |
|
POTENTIAL NEGATIVE IMPACTS |
MITIGATING MEASURES |
|
1. Degradation of vegetation resources due to
overgrazing. |
· Limitation of animal numbers. · Control of grazing. · Mixing of livestock species to maximise use of vegetation resource. · Reseeding and use of improved forages. · Introduction of stall-feeding systems. · Strategic placement of
watering points and salt to control animal distribution. |
|
2. Increased soil erosion due to removal of vegetation and
trampling causing sedimentation of surface waters. |
· Restriction of livestock access to unstable areas such as steep slopes. · Soil erosion control measures
(Table 7). |
|
3. Deterioration of soil fertility and physical
characteristics through removal of vegetation, increased soil erosion and
compaction. |
· As for 1 and 2. |
|
4. Increased rapid run-off due to vegetation removal and soil
compaction (decreased infiltration capacity). |
· Water conservation measures and water spreading. · As for 1 and 2. |
|
5. Displacement or reduction of wildlife populations by
reduction of habitat; disruption of migratory routes; competition for food and
water resources; introduction of diseases; impact of burning; increased poaching
and killing of wildlife considered as pests or predators of livestock. |
· Planning and implementation of range management strategies that minimise negative impacts on wildlife. · Establishment of wildlife reserves. · Ranching of wildlife to
protect wildlife resources. |
|
6. Pollution, environmental disruption and health hazards from
disease and pest control measures. |
· Use of chemicals that are species-specific and have low impact on other forms of life. · Use of spraying methods that minimise potential for water pollution. · Selection of disease-resistant or disease-tolerant livestock. · Fertiliser and manure management strategies to minimise water pollution. · Use of legume
nitrogen. |
|
7. Increased soil erosion resulting from the re-allocation of
crop residues from mulch to livestock feed and fuel. |
· Use of alternative crops for mulching e.g. herbaceous and woody legumes. · Use of alternative sources of
fuel such as biogas and the planting of trees. |
|
TECHNOLOGY |
USEFUL FOR |
|||
|
Soil-Moisture Conservation |
SOIL EROSION |
Soil Fertility |
||
|
Prevention |
Control |
|||
|
1. Land-use management |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
2. Conservation tillage |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
3. Ground cover management |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
4. Bench terracing |
X |
|
X |
|
|
5. Water harvesting |
X |
|
X |
|
|
6. Legumes for green manuring |
X |
X |
|
X |
|
7. Vegetative hedges |
X |
X |
|
X |
|
8. Strip cropping |
X |
X |
|
|
|
9. Contour bunding and farming |
X |
X |
|
|
|
10. Fertiliser and organic matter use |
X |
X |
X |
X |
SOURCE: Modified from SRIVASTAVA et al. (1993).TABLE 8: A SUMMARY OF KEY INDICATORS TO ASSESS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS.
|
PROBLEM AREA |
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SYSTEMS |
|||||
|
TEMPERATE & TROPICAL HIGHLANDS |
HUMID & SUBHUMID TROPICS |
ARID & SEMIARID TROPICS |
||||
|
RAINFED (MRT) |
IRRIGATED (MIT) |
RAINFED (MRH) |
IRRIGATED (MIH) |
RAINFED (MRA) |
IRRIGATED (MIA) |
|
|
CROP - LIVESTOCK INTERACTIONS |
1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7. A, B, C, D, F, G. |
1, 2, 4, 5, 7. A, B, C, F, G. |
6, 7, 8. A, B, C, F. |
4, 5, 6, 7, 8. B, C, F. |
1, 2, 5, 7. A, B, C, D, E, F, G. |
3, 4, 5, 6, 7. A, F. |
|
INDICATORS |
|
|
|
|
|
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS |
ECONOMIC IMPACTS |
|
1. Botanical composition (%). |
A. Availability of grazing resource. |
|
2. Bare ground (%). |
B. Availability of crop residues. |
|
3. Salts in soil/water. |
C. Labour availability for cropping. |
|
4. Nitrate/faeces in water. |
D. Manure availability and use for fuel or
fertiliser. |
|
5. Soil bulk density. |
E. Food security especially in drought conditions. |
|
6. Soil nitrogen/phosphorus contents. |
. arm income. |
|
7. Organic matter content. |
G. Animal numbers. |
|
8. Cation exchange capacity. |
|