Table 6.16 Problem in Feeds Purchasing and Changes in the Feed Formula
| |
|
|
FARMSIZE |
Total |
|||
|
Small |
Medium low |
Medium high |
Large |
||||
|
Do you have any problems when buying the feeds? |
Price (Price is to high) |
Count |
5 |
7 |
5 |
7 |
24 |
|
% of Total |
2.9 |
4.0 |
2.9 |
4.0 |
13.8 |
||
|
Unstable quality of the feed (low quality) |
Count |
|
4 |
2 |
|
6 |
|
|
% of Total |
|
2.3 |
1.1 |
|
3.4 |
||
|
The feeds are infected by bacterial |
Count |
|
10 |
7 |
13 |
30 |
|
|
% of Total |
|
5.7 |
4.0 |
7.5 |
17.2 |
||
|
The time between order and delivery is took too long |
Count |
|
1 |
3 |
1 |
5 |
|
|
% of Total |
|
0.6 |
1.7 |
0.6 |
2.9 |
||
|
No problem |
Count |
16 |
47 |
24 |
21 |
108 |
|
|
% of Total |
9.2 |
27.0 |
13.8 |
12.1 |
62.1 |
||
|
Other |
Count |
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
% of Total |
|
0.6 |
|
|
0.6 |
||
|
Total |
|
Count |
21 |
70 |
41 |
42 |
174 |
|
% of Total |
12.1 |
40.2 |
23.6 |
24.1 |
100.0 |
||
|
Since last year, have you ever changed the feeds formula or brand of the feeds |
Change the mixture |
Count |
7 |
13 |
13 |
21 |
54 |
|
% of Total |
4.0 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
12.1 |
31.0 |
||
|
Never change |
Count |
14 |
45 |
27 |
19 |
105 |
|
|
% of Total |
8.0 |
25.9 |
15.5 |
10.9 |
60.3 |
||
|
Contractor supply the all feeds |
Count |
|
12 |
1 |
2 |
15 |
|
|
% of Total |
|
6.9 |
0.6 |
1.1 |
8.6 |
||
|
Total |
|
Count |
21 |
70 |
41 |
42 |
174 |
|
% of Total |
12.1 |
40.2 |
23.6 |
24.1 |
100.0 |
||
|
Why do you change the mixture of the feeds or brands? |
Increasing price in raw materials |
Count |
1 |
3 |
6 |
11 |
21 |
|
% of Total |
1.9 |
5.6 |
11.1 |
20.4 |
38.9 |
||
|
Better quality |
Count |
5 |
7 |
5 |
8 |
25 |
|
|
% of Total |
9.3 |
13.0 |
9.3 |
14.8 |
46.3 |
||
|
Price of other brand is cheaper |
Count |
1 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
7 |
|
|
% of Total |
1.9 |
5.6 |
3.7 |
1.9 |
13.0 |
||
|
Other |
Count |
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
% of Total |
|
|
|
1.9 |
1.9 |
||
|
Total |
|
Count |
7 |
13 |
13 |
21 |
54 |
|
% of Total |
13.0 |
24.1 |
24.1 |
38.9 |
100.0 |
||
Source: TDRI, Livestock Farm Survey, December 2002
Table 6.17(a) No. of Suppliers of Piglets, Sows, Sire and Semen
| |
|
|
Province |
Total |
||||
|
Chon Buri |
Chachoengsao |
Lop buri |
Nakhon Ratchaima |
SaraBuri |
||||
|
How many suppliers for piglets do you have? .........supplier |
1 |
Count |
11 |
7 |
16 |
3 |
1 |
38 |
|
% of Total |
15.9 |
10.1 |
23.2 |
4.3 |
1.4 |
55.1 |
||
|
2 |
Count |
|
7 |
1 |
2 |
|
10 |
|
|
% of Total |
|
10.1 |
1.4 |
2.9 |
|
14.5 |
||
|
3 |
Count |
|
5 |
|
1 |
1 |
7 |
|
|
% of Total |
|
7.2 |
|
1.4 |
1.4 |
10.1 |
||
|
4 |
Count |
|
3 |
1 |
|
1 |
5 |
|
|
% of Total |
|
4.3 |
1.4 |
|
1.4 |
7.2 |
||
|
5 |
Count |
|
3 |
1 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
% of Total |
|
4.3 |
1.4 |
|
|
5.8 |
||
|
6 |
Count |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
% of Total |
1.4 |
2.9 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
||
|
10 |
Count |
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
% of Total |
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
||
|
Total |
|
Count |
12 |
29 |
19 |
6 |
3 |
69 |
|
% of Total |
17.4 |
42.0 |
27.5 |
8.7 |
4.3 |
100.0 |
||
Table 6.17(b) No. of Suppliers of Piglets, Sows, Sire and Semen
| |
|
|
Province |
Total |
||||
|
Chon Buri |
Chachoengsao |
Lop buri |
Nakhon Ratchaima |
SaraBuri |
||||
|
How many suppliers of sow and sire do you have? .........supplier |
1 |
Count |
15 |
17 |
12 |
8 |
4 |
56 |
|
% of Total |
14.7 |
16.7 |
11.8 |
7.8 |
3.9 |
54.9 |
||
|
2 |
Count |
3 |
13 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
25 |
|
|
% of Total |
2.9 |
12.7 |
2.9 |
2.9 |
2.9 |
24.5 |
||
|
3 |
Count |
3 |
7 |
2 |
|
1 |
13 |
|
|
% of Total |
2.9 |
6.9 |
2.0 |
|
1.0 |
12.7 |
||
|
4 |
Count |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
1 |
5 |
|
|
% of Total |
1.0 |
2.0 |
1.0 |
|
1.0 |
4.9 |
||
|
5 |
Count |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
|
% of Total |
|
1.0 |
|
1.0 |
|
2.0 |
||
|
9 |
Count |
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
% of Total |
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
||
|
Total |
|
Count |
22 |
41 |
18 |
12 |
9 |
102 |
|
% of Total |
21.6 |
40.2 |
17.6 |
11.8 |
8.8 |
100.0 |
||
|
Where do you buy the semen for artificial insemination? |
Breeder farms |
Count |
4 |
10 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
21 |
|
% of Total |
2.3 |
5.7 |
2.3 |
1.1 |
0.6 |
12.1 |
||
|
Contractors |
Count |
11 |
|
8 |
1 |
2 |
22 |
|
|
% of Total |
6.3 |
|
4.6 |
0.6 |
1.1 |
12.6 |
||
|
Department of livestock |
Count |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
|
% of Total |
|
0.6 |
|
0.6 |
|
1.1 |
||
|
Produce it yourself |
Count |
11 |
32 |
9 |
12 |
6 |
70 |
|
|
% of Total |
6.3 |
18.4 |
5.2 |
6.9 |
3.4 |
40.2 |
||
|
Never use it (only breed fatten swine) |
Count |
12 |
26 |
17 |
3 |
|
58 |
|
|
% of Total |
6.9 |
14.9 |
9.8 |
1.7 |
|
33.3 |
||
|
use sow |
Count |
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
% of Total |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
0.6 |
||
|
Total |
|
Count |
38 |
70 |
39 |
19 |
9 |
174 |
|
% of Total |
21.8 |
40.2 |
22.4 |
10.9 |
5.2 |
100.0 |
||
Source: TDRI, Livestock Farm Survey, December 2002
Table 6.18 Feed Conversion Ratios
|
Farm size |
FCR |
Death rates of Fattened pigs (%) |
||||||
|
Questionnaire |
Calculate |
0.1-2 |
2-4 |
4-6 |
6-8 |
8-10 |
>10 |
|
|
Small |
2.18 |
1.76 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Medium Low |
2.17 |
1.91 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Medium High |
2.62 |
1.92 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Large |
2.54 |
2.41 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Total |
2.43 |
2.21 |
28 |
18 |
29 |
10 |
23 |
5 |
|
Type of Farm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent Farm |
2.59 |
2.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Farm |
1.65 |
1.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hired Farm (Baht/Head) |
2.43 |
1.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: TDRI, Livestock Farm Survey, December 2002
Table 6.19 Drug Usage
| |
Anti-biotic |
Vaccine |
Disinfectant |
Worm laxalion |
Total |
|||||
|
Farm |
% |
Farm |
% |
Farm |
% |
Farm |
% |
Farm |
% |
|
|
Farm size |
||||||||||
|
Small (1-100) |
16 |
11.3 |
6 |
9.1 |
18 |
13.7 |
17 |
11.6 |
57 |
11.7 |
|
Median low (101-500) |
48 |
33.8 |
19 |
28.8 |
48 |
36.6 |
61 |
41.5 |
176 |
36.2 |
|
Median high (501-1000) |
37 |
26.1 |
19 |
28.8 |
30 |
22.9 |
34 |
23.1 |
120 |
24.7 |
|
large (>1000) |
41 |
28.9 |
22 |
33.3 |
35 |
26.7 |
35 |
23.8 |
133 |
27.4 |
|
Total |
142 |
100 |
66 |
100 |
131 |
100 |
147 |
100 |
486 |
100 |
|
Type of Farm |
||||||||||
|
Company Farm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent Farm |
100 |
70.4 |
58 |
87.9 |
111 |
84.7 |
108 |
73.5 |
377 |
77.6 |
|
Hire Farm |
42 |
29.6 |
8 |
12.1 |
26 |
19.8 |
39 |
26.5 |
115 |
23.7 |
|
Total |
142 |
100 |
66 |
100 |
131 |
100 |
147 |
100 |
486 |
100 |
|
Province |
||||||||||
|
Chonburi |
30 |
21.1 |
13 |
19.7 |
28 |
21.4 |
30 |
20.4 |
101 |
20.8 |
|
Chachoengsao |
55 |
38.7 |
38 |
57.6 |
61 |
46.6 |
58 |
39.5 |
212 |
43.6 |
|
Lopburi |
36 |
25.4 |
8 |
12.1 |
19 |
14.5 |
34 |
23.1 |
97 |
20.0 |
|
Nakhonratsima |
14 |
9.9 |
4 |
6.1 |
15 |
11.5 |
16 |
10.9 |
49 |
10.1 |
|
Saraburi |
7 |
4.9 |
3 |
4.5 |
8 |
6.1 |
9 |
6.1 |
27 |
5.6 |
|
Total |
142 |
100 |
66 |
100 |
131 |
100 |
147 |
100 |
486 |
100 |
Source: TDRI, Livestock Farm Survey, December 2002
Table 6.20 Number of Farms Affected by Communicable Diseases During the Last Three Years
(Percent)
| |
|
Farm Size |
Total |
No. |
|||
|
Small |
Medium Low |
Medium High |
Large |
% |
|||
|
1. Diseases |
|||||||
| |
F&M |
2.9 |
1.7 |
4.0 |
6.3 |
14.9 |
26 |
|
Hog cholera |
- |
1.7 |
2.3 |
1.7 |
5.7 |
10 |
|
|
Aujisky |
- |
4.0 |
3.4 |
2.9 |
10.3 |
18 |
|
|
Mycoplasma |
0.6 |
3.4 |
3.4 |
2.9 |
10.3 |
18 |
|
|
Parvo Virus |
- |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.7 |
4.0 |
7 |
|
|
Others |
1.1 |
2.9 |
3.4 |
4.0 |
11.5 |
20 |
|
|
Brucellosis |
(10.5) |
(5.3) |
(15.8) |
(15.8) |
(47.4) |
(9) |
|
|
2. Reaction to disease |
|||||||
| |
Vaccinating |
4.6 |
12.1 |
8.6 |
11.5 |
36.8 |
64 |
|
Using anti-biotic |
2.9 |
8.6 |
3.4 |
6.3 |
21.3 |
37 |
|
|
Employing veterinarian |
1.7 |
2.9 |
1.7 |
3.4 |
9.8 |
17 |
|
|
Employing animal husbandry |
- |
1.7 |
1.1 |
0.6 |
3.4 |
6 |
|
|
Seeking help from gov't |
1.1 |
3.4 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
5.7 |
10 |
|
|
Others |
4.6 |
13.8 |
8.0 |
9.2 |
35.6 |
62 |
|
Source: TDRI, Livestock Farm Survey, December 2002
Table 6.21 Mortality Rates of Piglets and Fattening Swine
|
Rate(%) |
Small |
Medium Low |
Medium High |
Large |
Total |
|
|
no. |
% |
|||||
|
1. Fattened Swine |
13 |
33 |
33 |
34 |
113 |
100 |
|
0.01-2 |
6 |
5 |
9 |
8 |
28 |
24.6 |
|
2-4 |
2 |
6 |
2 |
8 |
18 |
16 |
|
4-6 |
2 |
11 |
9 |
7 |
29 |
25.7 |
|
6-8 |
0 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
10 |
8.8 |
|
8-10 |
2 |
5 |
8 |
8 |
23 |
20.4 |
|
>10 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
5 |
4.5 |
|
2. Piglets & Culling |
20 |
50 |
19 |
24 |
113 |
100 |
|
0.01-2 |
8 |
18 |
5 |
6 |
37 |
32.8 |
|
2-4 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
13 |
11.5 |
|
4-6 |
1 |
8 |
3 |
6 |
18 |
16 |
|
6-8 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
5 |
4.5 |
|
8-10 |
1 |
8 |
3 |
7 |
19 |
16.8 |
|
>10 |
7 |
9 |
4 |
1 |
21 |
18.4 |
Source: TDRI, Livestock Farm Survey, December 2002
Table 6.22 What is the Main Causes of the Death among the Fattening Swine Farms
| |
|
|
Province |
Total |
||||
|
Chon Buri |
Chachoengsao |
Lop buri |
Nakhon Ratchaima |
SaraBuri |
||||
|
What is the main cause of the death among the fattening swine |
Epidermic |
Count |
3 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
|
10 |
|
% of Total |
1.7 |
2.9 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
|
5.7 |
||
|
Illness |
Count |
20 |
32 |
19 |
9 |
4 |
84 |
|
|
% of Total |
11.5 |
18.4 |
10.9 |
5.2 |
2.3 |
48.3 |
||
|
Accidents |
Count |
|
2 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
8 |
|
|
% of Total |
|
1.1 |
1.7 |
1.1 |
0.6 |
4.6 |
||
|
Bitten by |
Count |
|
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
% of Total |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
0.6 |
||
|
Injuries |
Count |
|
4 |
1 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
% of Total |
|
2.3 |
0.6 |
|
|
2.9 |
||
|
bite each other |
Count |
3 |
8 |
5 |
1 |
|
17 |
|
|
% of Total |
1.7 |
4.6 |
2.9 |
0.6 |
|
9.8 |
||
|
unstable weather condition |
Count |
2 |
4 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
% of Total |
1.1 |
2.3 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
||
|
do not grow fattened pigs |
Count |
9 |
15 |
10 |
5 |
4 |
43 |
|
|
% of Total |
5.2 |
8.6 |
5.7 |
2.9 |
2.3 |
24.7 |
||
|
Total |
|
Count |
37 |
70 |
39 |
19 |
9 |
174 |
|
% of Total |
21.3 |
40.2 |
22.4 |
10.9 |
5.2 |
100.0 |
||
Source: TDRI, Livestock Farm Survey, December 2002