3. Evaluation of the data collected and the methodology used
According to the recently introduced value added tax system, (VAT) enterprises earning less than BDS $60.000 annually are not required to disclose a financial statement to the authorities and this makes it very difficult or almost impossible to accurately monitor small companies involved in domestic trade. However, for larger enterprises that are engaged in foreign trade, (both imports and exports) all relevant data are collected and fed into the customs department computer system by a custom’s data input officer. As mentioned earlier, the information is taken from the C63 forms and this procedure was already discussed. This information is further re-evaluated by a custom’s assessment officer whose job is to check the accuracy of all calculations, quantities, commodity codes, etc. Assuming the correct procedure is followed, this officer would be in a position to detect any major errors.
As it relates to strengths and weaknesses in the system currently being used to collect and analyse data, there is hardly any room for mistakes excepts for that of human error. One advantage of this system is the fact that both the input and the assessment officers are able to crosscheck any doubtful information. For example, the assessment officer may detect an unusual increase or decrease in a particular product and to clarify this information he/she can easily asked the input officer to produce all C63 forms relating to that product so that accuracy can be ascertained. One weakness in this and most other systems is the possibility of human error, which can easily go unnoticed and consequently, incorrect information is passed on to other agencies. The statistical department is responsible for disseminating this information and that is done on a monthly basis. Bulletins are circulated to both governmental and non-governmental departments so that member of the general public can have access to this information.
Tables below provide a summary of values and quantities mentioned earlier.
Table 1
|
IMPORTS IN BDS $ |
|||
|
Wooden Furniture |
Wooden Products |
Sub-Total |
|
|
1994 |
9, 697, 494 |
2, 141, 565 |
11, 839, 059 |
|
1995 |
7, 408, 338 |
4, 032, 634 |
11, 440, 972 |
|
1996 |
9, 912, 619 |
9, 515, 445 |
19, 428, 064 |
|
1997 |
20, 339, 464 |
15, 657, 029 |
35, 996, 493 |
|
1998 |
22, 882, 645 |
19, 782, 602 |
42, 665, 247 |
|
1999 |
22, 711, 469 |
19, 523, 103 |
42, 234, 572 |
|
TOTAL FIGURE FOR IMPORTS = BDS $ 163, 604, 407 |
|||
Table 2
|
EXPORTS IN BDS $ |
|||
|
Wooden Furniture |
Wooden Products |
Sub-Total |
|
|
1994 |
597, 950 |
126, 831 |
724, 781 |
|
1995 |
534, 548 |
248, 539 |
783, 087 |
|
1996 |
1, 229, 457 |
116, 655 |
1, 346, 112 |
|
1997 |
1, 356, 996 |
250, 971 |
1, 607, 967 |
|
1998 |
1, 469, 966 |
65, 953 |
1, 535, 919 |
|
1999 |
973, 411 |
237, 921 |
1, 211, 332 |
|
TOTAL FIGURE FOR EXPORTS = BDS $ 7, 209, 198 |
|||
Table 3
|
EXPORT MARKETS FOR WOODEN FURNITURE FOR 1997 |
||
|
Country |
Value in BDS $ |
% |
|
|
||
|
St. Vincent |
435, 170 |
32.1 |
|
Jamaica |
273, 954 |
20.2 |
|
St. Lucia |
99, 378 |
7.3 |
|
Other CARICOM states |
338, 665 |
25.0 |
|
Extra Regional |
209, 829 |
15.4 |
|
TOTAL |
1, 356, 996 |
100.00 |
Table 4
|
EXPORT MARKETS FOR WOODEN FURNITURE FOR 1998 |
||
|
Country |
Value in BDS $ |
% |
|
St .Vincent |
348, 428 |
27.3 |
|
St. Kitts/Nevis |
199, 464 |
13.6 |
|
St. Lucia |
299, 625 |
20.3 |
|
Other CARICOM states |
463, 793 |
31.5 |
|
Extra Regional |
158, 656 |
10.9 |
|
TOTAL |
1, 469, 966 |
100.00 |
Table 5
|
EXPORTS MARKETS FOR WOODEN FURNITURE FOR 1999 |
||
|
Country |
Value in BDS $ |
% |
|
St. Vincent |
253, 310 |
26.0 |
|
St. Kitts/Nevis |
207, 904 |
21.4 |
|
St. Lucia |
283, 021 |
29.1 |
|
Other CARICOM states |
205, 661 |
21.1 |
|
Extra Regional |
23,515 |
2.4 |
|
TOTAL |
973, 411 |
100.00 |
Table 6
|
SOURCES OF WOODEN FURNITURE IMPORTS FOR 1997 |
||
|
Country |
Value in BDS $ |
% |
|
USA |
7, 382, 196 |
36.3 |
|
Trinidad & Tobago |
3, 526, 524 |
17.3 |
|
Great Britain |
2, 655, 600 |
13.1 |
|
Jamaica |
2, 036, 717 |
10.0 |
|
Others |
4, 738, 427 |
23.3 |
|
TOTAL |
20, 339, 464 |
100.00 |
Table 7
|
SOURCES OF WOODEN FURNITURE IMPORTS FOR 1998 |
||
|
Country |
Value in BDS $ |
% |
|
USA |
8, 313, 221 |
23.7 |
|
Great Britain |
4, 746, 996 |
13.6 |
|
Trinidad & Tobago |
3, 915, 981 |
20.3 |
|
Canada |
1, 691, 208 |
31.5 |
|
Others |
4, 216, 022 |
10.9 |
|
TOTAL |
22, 882 645 |
100.00 |
Table 8
|
SOURCES OF WOODEN FURNITURE IMPORTS FOR 1999 |
||
|
Country |
Value in BDS $ |
% |
|
USA |
7, 648, 941 |
33.7 |
|
Great Britain |
3, 105, 455 |
13.7 |
|
Trinidad & Tobago |
4, 681, 586 |
20.6 |
|
Canada |
2, 822, 426 |
12.4 |
|
others |
4, 453, 061 |
19.6 |
|
TOTAL |
22, 711, 469 |
100.00 |
Table 9
|
IMPORTS IN KILOGRAMS |
EXPORTS IN KILOGRAMS |
||
|
1998 |
61, 904, 112 |
1998 |
3, 906, 140 |
|
1999 |
61, 543, 308 |
1999 |
3,331, 768 |
|
2000 (Jan to July) |
29, 168, 543 |
2000 (Jan to July) |
1, 741, 831 |