When considering the manufacture of ice on board fishing vessels, seawater will be the natural choice of raw material. When considering whether to use fresh or seawater in land-based plants, the decision will depend on several factors, such as the availability of regular supplies, the location of the ice plant and the intended use of the ice (e.g. for use on board fishing vessels or on shore). Whatever type of water is used, it must be remembered that the resultant ice will come into direct contact with food. For this reason it is essential that the water used is free from contamination that could cause risks to human health or tainting of the fish so that it becomes unacceptable. This implies that the water must be of drinking-water quality and comply with the safety standards laid down by such bodies as the World Health Organization.
The use of seawater ice for chilling fish has been studied for several years and, with the development of suitable small ice machines that can be installed on board fishing vessels, this alternative is becoming more feasible for fishermen. The main advantages of the use of seawater ice are:
It can be produced at sea or on shore where shortages of freshwater are a serious problem or where freshwater is expensive.
Since space on fishing vessels is limited, the ability to produce ice when and if it is needed, rather than having to predict needs before a fishing trip begins, can have practical advantages.
Slightly lower storage temperatures can be obtained with seawater ice; therefore the shelf-life of fish can be prolonged. Commercially available flake/scale ice machines can manufacture seawater ice with a temperature from -9 °C to -20 °C and a variable percentage of salt content.
However, there are some major disadvantages, such as:
Seawater ice is not homogenous and when stored it can become a mixture of ice crystals and chilled salt solution, which is semi-fluid in consistency and leaches out the brine solution as the ice rises in temperature. Therefore, seawater ice has no fixed melting point (-1.5 °C to -2 °C for seawater ice having a salt content between 3 and 3.6 percent) and losses through melting and leaching of the brine solution will depend on the storage temperature.
Because of its variable temperature, there is a risk of partially freezing fish and salt absorption (particularly with thin-skinned fish) when using seawater ice.
Machines specifically designed for seawater ice production are needed to obtain the best-quality ice. These tend to be more expensive to purchase and run than ice machines designed for freshwater ice manufacture.
TABLE 2.1
Typical characteristics of flake seawater
ice-maker units suitable for small and medium fishing vessels
Capacity1 |
Cooling requirements |
Refrigerant |
Remarks |
(kg of ice/24 h) |
(kcal/h) |
||
550 |
4 000 |
R-22 |
The ice-making unit is equipped with a stainless steel revolving drum
evaporator. |
1 350 |
7 100 |
R-22 |
As above. It is estimated that a one-day ice production will require a refrigerated storage space of about 3.05 m3. |
1 950 |
11 000 |
R-22 |
As above. It is estimated that a one-day ice production will require a refrigerated storage space of about 4.4 m3. |
4 500 |
21 434 |
R-22, or any ozone-friendly refrigerant |
The self-contained unit has a pressurized water feed system and a stainless
steel evaporator disc for producing subcooled flake ice. |
8 000 |
36 290 |
As above |
The flake ice-maker can be installed on board as a self-contained unit
or as a remote unit with a refrigeration plant that can be driven electrically,
by diesel or hydraulics. All ice contact surfaces of the unit are stainless
steel or corrosion resistant to seawater materials. |
10 000 |
45 363 |
As above |
As above |
12 000 |
54 435 |
As above |
As above |
1 Ice production capacities can vary with evaporator and water temperatures, type of refrigerant and ice thickness. Therefore, the above data are the average output of seawater ice leaving the ice-maker at a temperature of -20 °C, under the conditions listed above
The following design factors for on-board seawater ice machines should be considered:
The plant needs to be capable of operating and producing ice under extreme pitching and rolling conditions of fishing vessels.
The plant needs to be made from non-corrosive materials (such as highquality stainless steel, aluminium, plastics, rubber and fibreglass) to resist the marine environment.
The equipment needs to operate at a lower temperature than freshwater ice machines - usually between -18 and -21 °C because seawater freezes at a lower temperature than freshwater.
The advantages of having on-board ice machines, especially for fishermen dedicated to the production of fresh fish, can be summarized as follows:
They allow flexibility in catch volume and trip length.
After the initial purchase costs of the machine, ice production can be less costly and only involves keeping the ice machine properly maintained and in good repair.
The fisherman is no longer dependent on shore-based plants for ice supplies for fishing trips; ice can be generated as and when required.
Being able to produce ice on board can overcome the problems that occur when a boat that has been loaded with shoreside ice returns with little or no catch. Ice costs can amount to a considerable percentage of operational costs in many countries.
The principal disadvantages are:
Costs of purchase and installation of machine and any ancillary equipment that may also be required, such as auxiliary power, conveyors, etc.
The ice produced is usually from saltwater, which can affect some fish species by salt absorption into the product.
Ice and consequently catch can be contaminated if care is not taken to use only clean seawater.
Machine maintenance will require some specialized technical expertise.
Additional power is needed.
Skilled labour and maintenance services are required (possibly on board the vessel).
The most common type of ice-maker to be installed on board a small fishing vessel would be a flake ice-maker. Table 2.1 gives some characteristics of flake ice-makers capable of producing seawater ice suitable for use on board small- and medium-size fishing vessels.
Table 2.2 gives some typical dimensions for various types of package ice machines that, according to manufacturers, are suitable for installation on board fishing vessels. All machines shown are water-cooled models, except for the Coldisc model. Some examples of other machines are given to show how changes in dimensions affect production capacities.
However, in order to use ice at sea it is not necessary to take ice-makers to sea. As has already been indicated, ice can be moved from place to place and is a form of portable refrigeration. This allows ice made in shore-based plants to be taken to sea and used as and when required.
Block ice was first manufactured commercially in 1869. It is made by filling metal cans with water and lowering them into a bath of brine (usually sodium or calcium chloride) refrigerated to well below the freezing point of water. The water freezes in the cans and the ice blocks are removed from the cans after several hours of freezing. The cans are immersed in freshwater to release the ice blocks, which are then stored.
TABLE 2.2
Capacities and principal dimensions of various
ice-making machines suitable for use on fishing vessels
Type of machine |
Capacity |
Depth |
Width |
Height |
Weight |
(tons US & kg/24 h) |
(mm) |
(mm) |
(mm) |
(kg) |
|
Flake ice Coldisc front discharge |
1.0 t |
660 |
520 |
510 |
45 machine only |
Flake ice, drum type |
1.0-2.5 t |
965 |
635 |
1 118 |
250 |
Flake ice, drum type |
6.0 t |
1 219 |
813 |
1 143 |
614 |
Shell ice, tube type, hot gas cycle |
11.5 t |
1 372 |
762 |
1 555 |
771 |
Shell ice, tube type, hot gas cycle |
13.0 t |
2 444 |
762 |
1 555 |
1 315 |
Slush ice |
33.3 t |
1 000 |
650 |
800 |
260 |
Slush ice |
23.5 t |
630 |
580 |
1 700 |
390 |
Slush ice |
35.5 t |
1 000 |
800 |
1 900 |
500 |
Slush ice |
27.0 t |
660 |
1 010 |
1 700 |
800 |
1 Outputs based on ambient of 90 °F (32 °C).
2 Outputs based on ambient of 50 °F (10 °C).
3 Output based on 0 to 1 °C feedwater, prechiller unit recommended.
The production of block ice is a batch operation and, once emptied, the cans are refilled with water and replaced in the brine tank for a further freezing period. Whatever the capacity of the ice-maker for block ice production, a continuous labour force is required to manage all operations, particularly ice harvesting and handling. The main advantages of block ice in comparison with other types of ice are:
simple and easy storage, handling and transportation;
relatively slow melting rate, and therefore losses during storage and distribution are minimal;
the ice is compact and therefore less storage space is required;
the ice can be reduced to any particle size as required through crushing before use;
the plant is robust engineering and relatively simple to maintain by a competent mechanical engineer;
the ice can be handled easily and sold by the block.
The main disadvantages of block ice production are:
the long time period required (8-36 h) to complete the freezing of water in cans (block size from 12 to 140 kg);
high labour costs and continuous attention to operations;
it is not a continuous automatic process and it takes a long time to produce ice from first start-up;
space requirements for the ice plant itself are greater than for modern automatic ice-makers;
adequately treated brines are necessary to minimize equipment corrosion; ice must be crushed before use.
Containerized block ice plants are available that house the ice plant, ice store and complete refrigeration and electrical systems inside standard containers. This allows portability, ease of transport by sea and land, better reliability and significantly shorter installation and break-in periods than traditional noncontainerized types. These advantages are important, particularly in remote areas where there is limited refrigeration and maintenance expertise. These units are fitted into standard 40 ft containers, and are easy to install. They only require a levelled foundation and to be under cover for protection against the weather, and they can be built in tropical climates and coastal conditions. Units are available that produce blocks of various sizes from 12.5 to 25 kg. Table 2.3 gives some information on containerized block ice plants.
Figure 2.1 shows the relationship between the thickness of ice produced and the time it takes to freeze in typical block ice production. In general, the thicker the ice block, the longer the freezing time. For example, a 136 kg block will require on average about 36 h of freezing time, in comparison to a 25 kg block that will require on average about 12 h.
TABLE 2.3
Typical characteristics of containerized block
ice plants
Ice capacity1 |
Ice storage capacity |
Space requirements |
3 000 |
6 000 |
30 (for the container) |
5 000 |
5 000 |
30 (for the container) |
7 500 |
3 000 |
30 (for the container) |
10 000 |
none |
30 (for the container) |
1 Rated capacity at continuous harvest operation. Ice storage temperature is about -5 °C; with an eight-hour freezing cycle.
The long time periods required to produce blocks of ice have led to the development of what are known as rapid block ice plants. The aim of these plants is to produce blocks of ice in a few hours. Instead of ice cans being immersed in a brine tank, the water in the can is frozen by a refrigerant which is circulated through the outer jacket of each can, as well as through a piping system located inside the cans. Ice is formed simultaneously on all refrigerated surfaces in contact with the water. After completion of the freezing cycle, the blocks are quickly removed from the can by means of a hot gas defrost and released by gravity. The main advantages of rapid block ice-makers are their reduced space requirements in comparison with traditional block ice-makers and the relatively easy operations for starting and stopping, which take a short time in comparison with the traditional block ice-makers. However, rapid block ice plants are generally more expensive to purchase, run and maintain than conventional block ice plants and their use in the fishing industry is limited.
Source: Hernandez Fuentes, 1995.
Flake ice can be defined as dry and subcooled small ice in flat pieces having an irregular wafer shape.
This type of small ice is manufactured by spraying or pouring water onto a refrigerated surface, often in the form of a cylinder or drum. The water freezes on the surface and forms thin layers of ice (2-3 mm thick). A scraper removes the subcooled ice, which breaks into small pieces resembling splinters of glass. These pieces of ice usually fall from the drum directly into a refrigerated compartment for storage. The cooled cylinder can rotate either in a vertical or horizontal plane.
A second type of flake ice-maker of particularly compact size, specifically designed for on-board ice-making is illustrated in Figure 2.2. Produced by North Star Ice Equipment Corporation, it departs from the normal drum style configuration and instead produces flake ice on a rotating subcooled evaporator disc. Ice is then harvested from both sides of the disc by adjustable ice scrapers. It would appear that this machine could be used in fish holds of boats 12 to 16 m long in some artisanal fleets considering its compact size and light weight. On smaller vessels it is likely to be installed on deck. The technical characteristics of this type of ice-maker are shown in Table 2.4.
FIGURE 2.2 Coldisc ice machine
Source: North Star Ice Equipment Corp., Seattle, Washington, USA.
A variation on flake ice is known as chip ice. Chip ice is manufactured by flowing water inside the ice-making cylinder, which is surrounded by an evaporating coil. The water is frozen inside the cylinder at an evaporator temperature of -12 to -30 °C and removed with an auger revolving inside the cylinder and pushing the ice upwards. In the upper part of the cylinder the ice is pressed, frozen further and ejected through the top of the cylinder. Chip ice has a temperature of -0.5 °C and an average thickness of 7-8 mm.
When installed on board fishing vessels, flake ice machines are often mounted on the deck so that the ice produced is discharged directly into the fish hold via a small hatch provided for this purpose. Most drum-type ice-makers designed for fishing vessels have an ice discharge port directly below the drum centre, making installation over a dedicated hatch possible. Depending on the machine, its location on deck and manufacturers recommendations, some form of shielding or cabinet may be necessary to protect control panels or other parts of the unit from the environment.
The below-deck installation is generally more problematic as most machines rely on gravity after removal of ice from the drum to put ice in the storage bins. This would require a fairly large fish hold with sufficient height to the deckhead to provide room for the machinery installation and enough height to allow gravity feed to a collection area or storage pens. Flake or shell ice machines may require the installation of conveyors or augers in larger vessels, though in the majority of instances, crew with shovels will transfer the ice produced to storage pens as needed.
TABLE 2.4
Typical characteristics of some flake
ice-makers
Ice capacity1 |
Cooling requirements |
Refrigerant |
Remarks |
(kg/24 h) |
(kcal/h) |
||
1 000 |
4 760 |
R-22 or any suitable ozone-friendly refrigerant |
Water supply: 42 litres per hour at 16 °C and -23 °C evaporator
temperature. |
2 250 |
10 590 |
As above |
Water supply: 102 litres per hour at 16 °C and -23 °C evaporator
temperature. |
4 500 |
21 434 |
As above |
Water supply: 204 litres per hour at 16 °C and -23 °C evaporator
temperature. |
9 000 |
42 867 |
As above |
Water supply: 420 litres per hour at 16 °C and -23 °C evaporator
temperature. |
1 For large ice-makers it is recommended that in tropical areas, with water temperatures over 21 °C, feed water should be chilled in a separate chiller (to cool the water to a range of 4.4 to 7.2 °C) to avoid significantly lower ice outputs and higher energy consumption. See Figure 2.3 for details on the relationship between feed-water temperature and required tonnes of refrigeration (1 tonne of refrigeration = 3 024 kcal/h = 12 000 Btu/h).
The main advantages of flake ice are as follows:
Flake ice has a larger heat-exchange surface than most other types of ice, therefore heat transfer between fish and ice occurs faster and more efficiently.
Due to the fact that flake ice is slightly subcooled (-5 to -7 °C), it can give off 83 kcal per kg when melting from ice to water; therefore slightly more heat can be extracted than with other types of ice at a temperature of 0 °C (80 kcal per kg).
It is easy to store and handle when adequately designed subcooled (-5 °C) insulated storage is provided.
The plant is small and compact, using less space than block ice plants.
The manufacture of ice begins within a very short time of starting the machine, almost allowing ice on demand.
Ice is ready to use immediately after manufacture (does not need crushing).
However, flake ice has a number of disadvantages in comparison to block ice. For example:
The plant is less robust and more complex and requires skilled engineers for maintenance.
Because of its higher surface area, the ice melts more quickly.
Weight for weight, flake ice requires more storage space.
The ice produced has to be weighed before sale rather than being sold by the unit.
As with block ice plants, flake ice plants can be containerized into 20 and 40 ft containers, depending on the capacity of the ice-makers and ice storage systems required. These units can be made so that they simply need to be connected to a power and water supply and with some modifications can be installed on board very large fishing vessels. However, these shipboard units are outside the size range of vessels examined in this publication. Large capacity models for freshwater flake ice production are also available for onshore installations, making between 10 and 100 tonnes of ice with multicontainer systems (these models have the complete icemaker unit mounted on top of the insulated container which is used as an ice store). Technical specifications and characteristics of some typical containerized flake and chip ice plants are given in Table 2.5.
TABLE 2.5
Typical technical features of containerized
flake/chip ice plants
Standard containerized flake/chip ice plants |
|||
Ice capacity |
Ice storage capacity |
Container |
Remarks |
3 000 |
13 m3 / |
20 ft |
Space requirements: 15.74 m2. |
5 000 |
13 m3 / |
20 ft |
Space requirements: 15.74 m2. |
10 000 |
13 m3 / |
20 ft |
Space requirements: 15.74 m2. |
5 000 |
37m3 / |
40 ft |
Space requirements: 30 m2. |
7 500 |
37 m3 / |
40 ft |
Space requirements: 30 m2. |
10 000 |
37 m3 / |
40 ft |
Space requirements: 30 m2. |
3 000 |
20 m3 / |
15 m3 |
Type of container: 40 ft. Space requirements: 30
m2. |
5 000 |
20 m3 / |
15 m3 |
Type of container: 40 ft. Space requirements: 30
m2. |
10 000 |
20 m3 / |
15 m3 |
Type of container: 40 ft. Space requirements: 30
m2. |
When there is a need for ice supplies to be transported over long distances, or there are preferences in certain fisheries for block ice, it is feasible to produce blocks from small or flake ice using block-compacting machines. These machines press small ice (flake or chip ice) into blocks of standard sizes and can be easily installed in shore-based small ice plants. These compacted blocks of small ice can be used on board fishing vessels giving the advantages of conventional block ice. They could be particularly suitable in tropical developing fisheries where ice-melt rates are high and fishermen are used to handling blocks of ice from older ice plants. The compacted blocks of small ice are easier to break into small pieces when needed.
One type of ice plant well suited for use on board fishing vessels is the slush ice machine that produces subcooled ice crystals. When mixed with water, the crystals allow slurry to be pumped easily by flexible hoses to wherever it is required on the boat. This ice acts in a similar manner to CSW when in slurry form, and as such can be used in CSW tanks or fish holds. In slightly less liquid form it can also be used to bulk pack fish in tote boxes. Figure 2.5 shows in diagrammatic form how this type of installation may be installed in fishing vessels of appropriate size.
Slush ice is a mixture of ice crystals in water and water slurry. The ice is formed by freezing ice crystals out of a weak brine solution in a tube-in-tube heat exchanger, also called a scraped-surface heat exchanger. Water is frozen as tiny round/ellipsoid crystals (about 0.2 to 1.3 mm diameter) on the inner-tube surface and a rotary screw conveyor moves the ice crystals out of the heat exchanger into a storage tank with water. The resulting mixture of ice and water (slush ice) can be pumped from the storage tanks through piping or hoses to the fish-chilling area or directly to an insulated container. The density and fluidity of slush ice can be adjusted by regulating the amount of water added, so that they can be tailored to different applications.
The advantages claimed for slush ice for chilling fish are as follows (see also Table 2.6):
It ensures faster and even chilling of fish to or below 0 °C, due to improved heat transfer.
It gives better contact with fish surface without bruises or pressure damage.
It is claimed that ice contamination is significantly reduced due to the sealed system design of the ice-maker and storage.
Ice can be pumped directly to where it is needed so there is not necessarily a need for storage.
FIGURE 2.4 Typical plant installation (24 tonnes/day)
Source: Sunwell Engineering Co. Ltd, Woodbridge, Ontario, Canada.
FIGURE 2.5 Schematic of slush ice use on fishing boats
Source: Brontec USA Inc.
TABLE 2.6
Typical specifications for a twin-tube slush
ice-maker
Capacity |
Power requirements |
Remarks |
5 000, based on feed water at 10 °C and 3% NaCl concentration |
220 volts, AC, 3 phases, 50/60 Hz; 9.6 kW |
Two ice-generator tubes, 316 stainless steel. R-22 as refrigerant. Two compressors of 8 610 kcal/h capacity and -11 °C at suction and 38 °C at condensing. Two seawater-cooled condensers of 1 380 litres per hour capacity each, with standard operating condensing temperature of 38 °C. Seawater supply temperature of 24 °C. Frame construction: stainless steel tube. Dimensions of unit: W: 100 mm; L: 660 mm; H: 1 700 mm |
Note: currently, models of slush ice-makers from 2.5 to 24 tonnes per 24 h capacity are available, both as self-contained units or as remote units, with separated refrigeration systems for on board installation.
Since the raw material for ice production is a brine solution (3-5 percent NaCl), seawater can be used for slush ice manufacture. This allows units to be installed on board fishing vessels. The commercial application of slush ice on board industrial purse seiners has been tested for chilling small pelagics, with good results. The slush ice has been used to enhance the traditional RSW system on board purse seiners, and improve the chilling process by significantly shortening the cooling period, from 7-20 h on regular RSW to about one hour. As can be seen from Figure 2.6, the cooling time for fish in slush ice is considerably shorter than in flake ice and is comparable with cooling times encountered with CSW.
CSW as a cooling medium is becoming much more common in small fishing vessels. For instance, boats as small as 32 ft (9.75 m) length overall are using this system to preserve high-value catch in top condition after capture. Overall temperature control in the CSW tanks is achieved by the addition of ice to lower seawater temperature and that of the catch as it is added during the trip. To prevent temperature stratification in CSW tanks, two basic systems are used, one is compressed air, also known as the champagne system, and the other is CSW recirculation by pump. These are illustrated in Figure 2.7.
RSW systems have an on-board refrigeration plant to chill the seawater rather than using melting ice. In addition, they need pumps, piping and filters for circulation of the RSW in the tanks or holds. In normal practice this system requires a dedicated power plant, such as a diesel or diesel electric generator, providing direct power or electricity to operate the electric motors for refrigeration compressors and circulation pumps, depending on the type of drive motors used.
FIGURE 2.7 CSW tanks with the champagne compressed air system and recirculation of water
Two basic systems are used for RSW cooling of products: one involves simply immersing the catch in filled RSW tanks; the second system does not use tanks but sprays chilled water over shelved catch.
When filling RSW tanks in the hold with clean water that is then refrigerated, some boats will load ice into the tanks prior to filling with water. This saves time and alleviates some of the load on the refrigeration system by pre-chilling the water. Figure 2.8 illustrates a typical RSW spray system as installed in vessels of the Pacific northeast coast. Tanks for RSW are similar in arrangement to CSW tanks, the principal difference is in the installation of a refrigeration unit with its power supply and a much better filter system for the recirculated water.
Source: Integrated Marine Systems Inc., Pt Townsend, WA, USA.
Recent developments in hydraulic systems have now made it possible to run a refrigeration compressor using hydraulic power from a power take off (PTO) from the boats main engine. This has been developed utilizing load-sensing pumps, which, when set, maintain a constant flow regardless of engine speed. This allows a refrigeration compressor to run at constant speed whether the engine is idle or running at full speed. These pumps go to standby mode when there is no demand for hydraulic flow, and only small amounts of power are consumed in this mode. However, if the main engine is idling when the compressor cuts in there is a considerable power demand. For this reason engineers recommend that the main engine should have very good power reserves at low or idle speeds.
TABLE 2.7
Montreal Protocol provisions regarding
ozone-depleting chemicals
Chemical compound |
Remarks |
Group I - CFCs |
Gradual reduction over the 1990s. |
Group II - Halons |
Gradual reduction over the 1990s. |
Group III |
Gradual reduction over the 1990s. |
Note: all Protocol provisions came into force on 1 January 1989 and were revised in 1990.
TABLE 2.8
Atmospheric lifetimes and ozone depletion
potential of some halogenated hydrocarbons
Chemical compound |
Lifetime |
Ozone depletion potential |
HFC: R-32 (CH2F2) |
6.7 |
0 |
HFC: R-125 (CF3CF2H) |
26 |
0 |
HFC: R-134a (CF3CFH2) |
14 |
0 |
HCF: R-143a (CF3CH3) |
40 |
0 |
HCFC: R-22 (CHF2Cl) |
14 |
0.047 |
CFC: R-11 (CFCl3) |
60 |
1 |
CFC: R-12 (CF2Cl2) |
105 |
0.95 |
Chemicals used as refrigerants, known as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), are known to have adverse effects on the earths stratospheric ozone layer. As a consequence, international efforts are being made to phase out most of the CFCs or halogenated hydrocarbons from commercial use (see Table 2.7). A number of more environmentally acceptable alternatives are being proposed, such as R-22, ammonia (R-717), HP-62 and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) and hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), see Table 2.8. Examples of the new HFCs and HCFCs are as follows:
HCF R-134a (CF3CFH2): which is a replacement for the CFC R-12 used in small chillers. domestic refrigeration and vehicle air-conditioning units.
HCFC R-22 (CHF2CL): which is a replacement for CFC R-12 in industrial refrigeration units.
TABLE 2.9
Brief technical data of some refrigerants used
in fisheries
Refrigerant |
Evaporating pressure at -15 °C |
Condensing pressure at 30 °C |
Boiling point at 1.013 bar |
(lb/sq. in) |
(lb/sq. in) |
(°C) |
|
R-12 (CCl2F2) |
11.8 |
93.2 |
-29.8 |
R-22 (CHClF2) |
28.3 |
159.8 |
-40.8 |
R-717 (ammonia) |
19.6 |
154.5 |
-33 |
The main technical characteristics of HFCs and HCFCs are:
Both types of refrigerants are volatile and insoluble in water.
Following release into the environment, these refrigerants remain in the atmosphere where they are oxidized into a variety of degradable products, which are not considered to be toxic or noxious.
Commercially available HCFs and HCFCs are classified as ozone-friendly refrigerants.
HCFCs are considerably less harmful towards the ozone layer than CFCs, but HCFCs do transport chlorine into the ozone layer following release into the environment. Therefore, countries such as the United States of America have developed a schedule for a complete ban on the manufacture and importation of HCFCs by the year 2030.
With regard to the refrigerants most widely used in fisheries, R-12, R-22, R-502 and ammonia (R-717) are the leading products, see Table 2.9. However, with the ban on CFCs by the year 2000 in developed countries, most of the existing refrigeration plants using CFCs will be facing serious problems in the conversion from R-12 and R-502 to other refrigerants. From the engineering point of view, the conversion of refrigeration plants to use alternate refrigerants is possible in some cases. For example, a brief analysis for converting R-12 refrigeration plants into R-22 plants could show the following:
There are significant differences between R-12 and R-22, such as boiling point temperatures at normal atmospheric pressure (-29.8 °C for R-12 and -40.8 °C for R-22) and higher gas discharge pressures for R-22.
Due to the higher discharge temperatures of R-22, differently rated condensers will have to be installed in the converted refrigeration plant. In addition, as a general rule, a refrigerant with a lower boiling point will require a smaller compressor than a refrigerant with a higher boiling point for the same capacity. Also, in general, refrigerants with lower boiling points will require higher operating pressures.
As a result of the higher gas pressures of R-22, the converted refrigeration plant will require other pipework suitable to resist the higher working pressures.
An accurate costing should be done before retrofitting existing refrigeration plants, considering that in some cases the conversion may be too expensive. Therefore, a detailed analysis of costs and benefits should be prepared before taking any decision, including a realistic assessment of the residual life span and economic value of the refrigeration plant.
Currently R-717 (ammonia) is the main alternative refrigerant for CFCs used commercially for large-size ice plants, with the advantage that this chemical has no detrimental effect on the ozone layer. Although R-717 is considered toxic and corrosive, the sharp odour and irritating properties also serve as a warning when leaks develop. It is rated as being lethal, or capable of producing serious injuries to humans at concentrations of 0.5 to 1 percent for exposures of a few to 30 minutes. This is particularly true on board boats, where clouds of R-717 are produced by large gas leaks in enclosed areas, which in some cases could trap and cause serious injuries or death to personnel before they could evacuate the refrigeration section. In addition, R-717 can be subject to explosion and fire when combined with certain amounts of air or oxygen. The smallest percentage of gas/vapour that will make an ignitable air-vapour mixture for R-717 is 15.5 percent by volume in air. If there is less gas in the mixture, it is too lean to burn. However, on board, in some areas such as refrigerated process or storage areas, which can be considered as unusually tight locations, the release of R-717 in large quantities can result in an explosion. Therefore, there are health hazards associated with the use of R-717 and skilled labour is required to operate and maintain R-717 refrigeration plants.
On board large fishing vessels, R-717 refrigeration machinery should be located in a separate refrigeration section (vapour-proof type compartment equipped with leakage/fire alarms systems). The refrigeration section should have two exits, one of them with direct access to the open deck. The section should be provided with emergency ventilation with a capacity of 30 times the air volume per hour and be equipped with remote-controlled emergency water sprinklers. The exits from the refrigeration section should be equipped with emergency water curtains to prevent further leakage of ammonia outside the room. The primary function of the sprinkler systems is to limit the spread of gas, to protect personnel in these areas and maintain escape routes. Additionally, water sprinklers may extinguish fires in the refrigeration room and control the amount of heat produced. Suitable pressurized air breathing apparatus should be available at both exits from the refrigeration section and be located within easy reach.