|
Working group I
Essential principles, definition and scope governing the provision
of scientific advice
|
Working group II
Management of the provision of scientific advice
|
Working Group III
Procedures and mechanisms for the provision of scientific advice
|
- Scope and definition of scientific advice
- Essential core principles for the provision of scientific advice
- Advantages of developing a set of core principles 4. Mechanisms to
enhance participation of developing countries
- Harmonization of terminology, methodologies and outputs
- Potential establishment of new programmes
|
- Administration and management systems for the provision of scientific
advice for Codex and Member countries
- Working relationships and interactions with Codex subsidiary bodies
including communication of scientific advice
- Interactions between assessors and managers in general and specifically
in relation to risk assessment policy
- Mechanisms to enhance participation of developing countries
- Identification and prioritization of risk assessment topics
- FAO/WHO clearing house for risk assessments.
- Language considerations
- Use of risk communication experts and researchers.
- Collaboration with other international organizations/bodies to effectively
apply a risk-based approach across the Agri-Food continuum
- Procedures for the submission of requests for scientific advice
|
- Ways to access and enhance worldwide residue, incidence and disease
surveillance data
- Mechanisms to enhance participation of developing countries
- Identification and selection of experts including active and/or passive
means and use of scientific academies. (need for group balance and consideration
of situations where insufficient response to request for experts occurs)
- Remuneration and recognition of experts
- Declaration and disclosure of interests and determination of expert
bias - uniform criteria and application (questionnaire satisfactory?),
use of best FAO/WHO judgement
- Confidentiality, data protection and proprietary data
- Accountability procedures, including peer review
- Means to obtain clearer communication of judgements in choice and
use of data
- Outputs, including how to address divergent and minority opinions
- Inclusion of non-experts and public consultation
- Use of evaluations from national/regional authorities
|