Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


ANNEX 3 - Issues assigned to the working groups

Working group I
Essential principles, definition and scope governing the provision of scientific advice

Working group II
Management of the provision of scientific advice

Working Group III
Procedures and mechanisms for the provision of scientific advice

  1. Scope and definition of scientific advice
  2. Essential core principles for the provision of scientific advice
  3. Advantages of developing a set of core principles 4. Mechanisms to enhance participation of developing countries
  4. Harmonization of terminology, methodologies and outputs
  5. Potential establishment of new programmes
  1. Administration and management systems for the provision of scientific advice for Codex and Member countries
  2. Working relationships and interactions with Codex subsidiary bodies including communication of scientific advice
  3. Interactions between assessors and managers in general and specifically in relation to risk assessment policy
  4. Mechanisms to enhance participation of developing countries
  5. Identification and prioritization of risk assessment topics
  6. FAO/WHO clearing house for risk assessments.
  7. Language considerations
  8. Use of risk communication experts and researchers.
  9. Collaboration with other international organizations/bodies to effectively apply a risk-based approach across the Agri-Food continuum
  10. Procedures for the submission of requests for scientific advice
  1. Ways to access and enhance worldwide residue, incidence and disease surveillance data
  2. Mechanisms to enhance participation of developing countries
  3. Identification and selection of experts including active and/or passive means and use of scientific academies. (need for group balance and consideration of situations where insufficient response to request for experts occurs)
  4. Remuneration and recognition of experts
  5. Declaration and disclosure of interests and determination of expert bias - uniform criteria and application (questionnaire satisfactory?), use of best FAO/WHO judgement
  6. Confidentiality, data protection and proprietary data
  7. Accountability procedures, including peer review
  8. Means to obtain clearer communication of judgements in choice and use of data
  9. Outputs, including how to address divergent and minority opinions
  10. Inclusion of non-experts and public consultation
  11. Use of evaluations from national/regional authorities


Previous Page Top of Page Next Page