FAO LEGISLATIVE STUDY 85 Intellectual property rights in plant varieties Laurence R. Helfer for the |
|
|
|
The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. |
ISBN
92-5-105222-0
ISSN
1014-6679
All rights reserved. Reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product for educational or other non-commercial purposes are authorized without any prior written permission from the copyright holders provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of material in this information product for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the copyright holders. Applications for such permission should be addressed to the Chief, Publishing Management Service, Information Division, FAO, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy or by e-mail to [email protected]
© FAO 2004
1.1. Intellectual property rights: philosophical and policy underpinnings
1.2. Policy objectives favouring IPRs in new plant varieties
1.3. The evolution and structure of the international intellectual property system1.3.1. Limited treaty obligations
1.3.2. The territoriality of IPRs
1.3.3. Core obligations imposed by international intellectual property agreements
1.3.4. The "minimum standards" framework of multilateral IPR agreements
1.3.5. Identifying the relevant international agreements and institutions relating to intellectual property rights in plant varieties.
1.3.6. Specific policy objectives in tension with IPRs
2. PART II: INTERNATIONAL IPR AGREEMENTS REGULATING PLANT VARIETIES AND PLANT BREEDERS RIGHTS
2.1. Introduction and overview
2.2. The UPOV Acts2.2.1. The 1978 UPOV Act
2.2.2. Eligibility requirements
2.2.3. The 1991 UPOV Act
2.2.4. Resistance to the 1991 Act2.3.1. TRIPs as a spur to plant variety protection.
2.3.2. Patent protection for plant varieties under TRIPs
2.3.3. Sui generis protection for plant varieties under TRIPs
3.1. Introduction
3.2. Classification of states according to their international IPR obligations3.2.1. Cumulative treaty obligations
3.2.2. Conflicting treaty obligations3.3. Identifying the level of discretion available to states in each treaty classification
3.3.1. WTO and UPOV 1991 Act members
3.3.2. WTO and UPOV 1978 Act members
3.3.3. 1991 or 1978 UPOV Act members only
3.3.4. Member of WTO only
3.3.5. Not a Member of WTO, UPOV or other IPR agreements3.4. Discretionary choices available to "WTO only" Members
3.4.1. Introduction
3.4.2. Revising eligibility requirements
3.4.3. Additional conditions on the grant of protection
3.4.4. Modifying exclusive rights, protected material, terms or exceptions and limitations3.5. Current trends in national laws
3.5.1. Alternative plant variety protection laws
3.5.2. Failure to enact plant variety protection laws3.6. Understanding the limitations of sui generis IPR systems
4.1. Introduction
4.2. The WTO Doha Round of trade negotiations4.2.1. Trade tensions between industrialized and developing nations
4.2.2. Disagreements over the scope of review of article 27.3(b)
4.2.3. Provisions of the Doha declarations relating to Article 27.3(b)
4.2.4. Balancing IPRs and other objectives: mandatory or permissive policy options in a revised TRIPs Agreement4.3. International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture ("ITPGR").
4.3.1. Overview and basic objectives
4.3.2. Intellectual property provisions of the ITPGR
4.3.3. The relationship between the ITPGR and TRIPs