Two parallel panel groups were formed as follows:
Panel Group on Roots/Cassava
Facilitator: Prof. E. Tollens
Reporter: Mr. B. P. Chaura
Members: N. Keita; L. M. Machirovi; E. Mpyisi; F. Ngopya; N. Ngonde;
N.B. Lutaladio; Chalit Amnuay; Kajonwan Itharattana; V. Sandifolo
Panel Group on Tubers (yam, sweet potatoes, cocoyam)
Facilitator: Dr. S. Doumbia
Reporter: Ph. Vernier
Members: M. O. Akoroda; M. Nyoni; J. Q. Rijks; H. Som
4.1.1 Concepts, Definitions, Standards
Depending on the main use of the production, the following classification and related concepts and methods of data collection is proposed:
|
Main purpose of production |
Number of harvests |
Mixture |
Concept of production |
Region |
Method |
|
Total or mainly for market |
One |
Pure |
Production harvested |
Asia; emerging Africa |
Interview + crop cuts at harvest time |
|
Mainly food reserve; mixed (commercial and subsistence) |
Several |
Mainly mixture with cassava as dominant crop |
Production harvested + potential |
Africa + part of Latin America |
Interview (recording harvest in local units) + a few crop cuts (for potential production) |
|
Mainly subsistence, remote areas or land locked |
Several + partial |
Mixture |
Production harvested + potential |
Africa + part of Latin America |
Interview (recording harvest in local units) + a few crop cuts (for potential production) |
Note: Measure area for crop cutting fields (P = A * Y)
Components of Production:
In the perspective of food security it is important to estimate production of leafs as well as of the roots.
Production is to be reported in weight of clean fresh product.
Measurements and data collection can be done in several ways e.g. fresh, dry, etc.
Conversion factors:
This should be done in fresh equivalent and should be area specific.
To be determined through a specific survey with indication of mean and coefficient of variance (CV).
It is required that all countries produce conversion factors for all products from the different zones of the country (product to clean fresh roots).
4.1.2 Data collection / survey design
a) Stratification variables
1. Administrative Units
2. Agro-ecological Zones
3. Market access/ population density, remoteness
4. Urban/rural
5. Farming systems (sole/mixed - area with cassava dominant/minor crop, see FAO classification 2001)
6. Use of GIS Maps.
All the above factors depend on country situation.
b) Crop cutting
Optimum number and size to be studied (40 plants ´ 4 replications or 5 by 5 meters as an indication).
c) Interviews
- Monthly visits to farmers to be validated by additional trials (optimal effective cost and frequency of visits
- Calibration of local units (weight/volume to Kg, and area to ha).
4.1.3 Post -Harvest Crop Losses
- What is loss?
- Not enough information
- Loss is weight loss due to diseases, pests and rodents, transport/ handling
Quality loss due to time lag before getting food to consumption, pests may lead to reduced weight and price.
- Tend to be overestimated
- Vary seasonally
- Competing foods or type of product
- Need for further studies.
4.1.4 Follow-up action
a) Advocacy for improvement of RTC/Cassava statistics given the importance in food security for countries in terms of global cassava strategy. Better Cassava statistics is an imperative.
b) We recommend that, where relevant, to conduct crop specific surveys be conducted for root and tuber crops.
c) Need to elaborate specific methodologies for Cassava statistics to reduce under- and/or over- estimation.
d) Need for further studies:
- on crop losses throughout the food/market chain
- optimum size for crop cutting plots
- use of GPS for area measurement
- use of crop growth physiological models
- econometric models for forecasting and policy planning
- optimal/ cost-effective frequency of visits to farmers/recall in interviews
- conversion factors
- leaf statistics (weight, frequency of harvest, price of produce, effect of leaf picking on root yield).
4.1.5 Action Plan
a) Suggested pilot countries for studies and/or programmes:
- DRC (Multi-donor projects)
- Nigeria (IFAD project)
- Cameroon (IFAD project)
- Malawi (USAID-project)
- Mozambique (USAID, ROCKEFELLER)
- Thailand (JICA)
- Brazil (CLAYUCA, EMBRAPA).
b) Global Research Programme on Cassava Statistics (3 years)
It is recommended and encouraged that there be a Global Research Programme on Cassava Statistics involving FAO, National and International Research Institutes and Networks. These organizations need to work together and with national governments to improve statistics.
FAO should coordinate this global effort given its mandate and comparative advantage. This consortium should seek funding for this programme to carry out this objective.
4.2.1 Concepts and Definitions
a) Plot (parcelle)
Not necessarily homogeneous
b) Field (champ)
Group of plots (1 or more).
Fields can be located in different parts of farm.4.2.2 What should be measured?
The variables that should be measured can de differentiated by objective:
For Production Statistics - Production is required.
4.2.3 Which Production to Measure?
The various aspects of production can be differentiated as follows:
In case of double harvest (the 2d is for seed, 3 to 4 months after first harvest).
|
For total production: |
- Plot by plot |
|
|
- Aggregate |
|
For sample production: |
- Crop-cut |
For stock estimation (reserve portion of harvested crop): Stock can be in a fresh form or processed form.
4.2.4 Stratification for Collecting Data
a) By Administrative /Agro-ecological zones:
- Administrative unit
- Soil type
- Rainfall (total and pattern).
b) By Production System:
- Intensification level
- Production purpose: Consumption, Commercial, Mixed objectives.
4.2.5 Area Estimation
Estimate area from mounds/mound density.
4.2.6 Yield Estimation
Optimal size of crop cut area (number of mounds recommended is 40 plants x 4 replications).
4.2.7 Production estimation
Multiply estimated area by estimated yield.
In the case of mixed cropping: P= yield per plant x plant density observed.
4.2.8 Post Harvest Crop Losses
Post harvest crop losses are affected by, or varies by:
Agro-ecological zones or regions, etc.
Further studies are required to assess actual loss rates.
4.2.9 Where are we?
Past methodologies, use baseline surveys to reduce costs.
4.2.10 Action Plan
Address remaining problems.