Contents - Previous - Next


Breakdown of water resources by basic unit

The above review of water resources, based on countries, does not provide information about the distribution of the resources among the various river basins and basic units. For several countries, where detailed studies have been carried out, this information exists and was used in the assessment of water resources and irrigation potential. For several other countries, however, the information was not available.

A systematic approach, based on information available through FAO's Geographic Information System (GIS) has thus been used to provide information on water resources for the units for which it was not available in the literature.

A first estimate of water resources by basic unit can be obtained by multiplying annual precipitation P by a runoff coefficient c.

Q = c.P

where Q is the average annual flow produced inside the basic unit; Q and P are expressed in mm/year and c is dimensionless.

This was achieved by preparing a raster coverage of runoff coefficients from a map of African runoff coefficients [28] and combining the results with the annual average rainfall map (Figure 7) [23].

By multiplying the precipitation map by the runoff coefficient map, a map of runoff Q was obtained. In first approximation, this runoff can be assimilated to internal renewable water resources. This approximation is specially valid in humid areas. In arid areas, where groundwater resources are relatively important compared to surface water, this approximation may be less valid.

Integration of the runoff figures at the level of each country was performed to obtain country values of runoff, R. expressed in km3/year. The 53 country values of R were then compared with the figures of IRWR in Table 6. To avoid giving excessive importance to large and humid countries, the results were plotted in a logarithmic scale after having transformed IRWR and R from km/year to mm/year by dividing it by the area of the country. The comparison showed good agreement between the two sets of data and it was decided that this method was satisfactory to provide estimates of internal water resources for those basic units for which no information was available.

A similar test was performed to compare runoff measured at the outlet of large basins (obtained from the literature) and the value of runoff computed by integrating Q over the basins. The results show a systematically lower value of the measured runoff Rm compared to R. the relative difference being more important in arid than in humid areas. This can easily be explained by the losses occurring in the basins before the water reaches the outlet: losses by evaporation in the reaches, lakes, wetland and uses by agriculture and other sectors. Losses are relatively more important in arid areas, where the evaporation potential is higher and use by agriculture is usually more important than in humid areas. However, relative uncertainties with arid regions are less important because most of the missing information concerns humid countries.

The results of the second test (basin level) also bring the concept of scale in assessment of water resources. As both the runoff coefficient map [28] and the IRWR figures in Table 6 [21] used the country as a basis for assessment of water resources, they give similar results. A study at a smaller scale (local level) would probably show higher values of measured runoff due to reduced possibilities of losses, against the lower values measured at the larger scale (basin level).

TABLE 6: Water resources by country (all figures in km3/yr)

CONTRY

Internal renewable water resources

Incoming water

Global renewable water res.

Other resources


Surface water

Ground water

Overlap

Total

Surface water


Ground water

Surface water

Ground water

Total

Desalination

Groundw depletion



C.


(1+2-3)

T

B


(1+5+6)

(2+7)

(8+9-3)




(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)

(10)

(11)

(12)

1. ALGERIA

13.2

1.7 a

1

13.9

0.4

0

0.03

13.6

1.73

14.33

0.03

5

2. ANGOLA

182

72 B

70

184

0

0

0

182

72

184

X

0

3. BENIN

10

1.8 a

1.5

10.3

0.5

15

0

25.5

1.8

25.8

0

0

4. BOTSWANA

1.7

1.7 a

0.5

2.9

11.5

0.3

0

13.5

1.7

14.7

0

0

5. BURKINA FASO

13

9.5 a

5

17.5

...

X

0

X+13

9.5

X+17.5

0

0

6. BURUNDI

3.5

2.1 b

2

3.6

X

0

0

X+3.5

2.1

X+3.6

0

0

7. CAMEROON

268

100 b

100

268

...

0

0

268

100

268

0

0

8. CAPE VERDE

0.18

0.12











9 CENTRAL AFRICAN REP.

141

56 b

56

141

0

X

0

X+141

56

X+141

0

0

10 CHAD

13.5

11.5 b

10

15

28

0

0

41.5

11.5

43

0

0

11 COMOROS

X

X

X

1.02

0

0

0

X

X

1.02

0

0

12 CONGO

222

198 b

198

222

...

610

0

832

198

832

...

0

13 COTE D'IVOIRE

74

37.7 a

35

76.7

1

X

0

X+75

37.7

X+77.7

0

0

14 DJIBOUTI

X

X

X

0.3

0

2

X

X+2

X

X+2.3

0

0

15 EGYPT

0.5

1.3 a

0

1.8

65.5

0

1.2

66

2.5

68.5

0.01

...

16 EQUATORIAL GUINEA

25

10 b

5

30

...

0

0

25

10

30

0

0

17 ERITREA

X

X

X

2.8

0

6

0

X

X

8.8

0

0

18 ETHIOPIA

X

X

X

110

0

0

0

X

X

110

0

0

19 GABON

162

62 b

60

164

0

0

0

162

62

164

0

0

20 GAMBIA

3

0.5 b

0.5

3

5

0

0

8

0.5

8

0

0

21 GHANA

29

26.3 a

25

30.3

22.9

0

0

51.9

26.3

53.2

0

0

22 GUINEA

226

38 b

38

226

0

0

0

226

38

226

0

0

23 GUINEA BISSAU

12

14 b

10

16

11

0

0

23

14

27

0

0

24 KENYA

17.2

3 a

0

20.2

...

10

0

27.2

3

30.2

0

0

25 LESOTHO

4.73

0.5 b

0

5.23

0

0

0

4.73

0.5

5.23

0

0

26 LIBERIA

200

60 b

60

200

32

0

0

232

60

232

0

0

27 LIBYA

0.1

0.5 a

0

0.6

0

0

0

0.1

0.5

0.6

0.003

2 to 4

28 MADAGASCAR

332

55 b

50

337

0

0

0

332

55

337

0

0

29 MALAWI

16.14

1.4 b

0

17.54

1.14

0

0

17.28

1.4

18.68

0

0

30 MALI

50

20 a

10

60

40

0

0

90

20

100

0

0

31 MAURITANIA

0.1

0.3 a

0

0.4

0

11

0

11.1

0.3

11.4

X

0

32 MAURITIUS

2.03

0.68 a

0.5

2.21

0

0

0

2.03

0.68

2.21

0

0

33 MOROCCO

22.5

7.5 a

0

30

0

0

0

22.5

7.5

30

0.004

0

34 MOZAMBIQUE

97

17 b

17

97

106

5

0

208

17

208

0

0

35 NAMIBIA

4.1

2.1 b

0

6.2

11.3

28

0

43.4

2.1

45.5

0.003

0

36 NIGER

1

2.5 a

0

3.5

29

0

0

30

2.5

32.5

0

0

37 NIGERIA

214

87 b

80

221

59

X

0

X+273

87

X+280

0

0

38 RWANDA

5.2

3.6 b

2.5

6.3

0

X

0

X+5.2

3.6

X+6.3

0

0

39 SAO TOME AND PRINCIPE

X

X

X

2.18

0

0

0

X

X

2.18

0

0

40 SENEGAL

23.8

7.6 b

5

26.4

2

11

0

36.8

7.6

39.4

0

0

41 SEYCHELLES

X

X

X

X

0

0

0

X

X

X

0

0

42 SIERRA LEONE

150

50 b

40

160

0

0

0

150

50

160

0

0

43 SOMALIA

5.7

3.3 b

3

6

7.5

0

X

13.2

X+3.3

X+13.5

0

0

44 SOUTH AFRICA

40

4.8

0

44.8

5.2

0

0

45.2

4.8

50

X

0

45 SUDAN

28

7

0

35

119

0

0

147

7

154

0

0

46 SWAZILAND

X

X

X

2.64

1.87

0

0

X+1.87

X

X+4.51

0

0

47 TANZANIA

80

30 b

30

80

0

9

0

89

30

89

0

0

48 TOGO

10.8

5.7 a

5

11.5

0.5

0

0

11.3

5.7

12

0

0

49 TUNISIA

2.31

1.21 a

0

3.52

0.32

0

0.1

2.63

1.31

3.94

0.009

1

50 UGANDA

35

29 b

25

39

27

0

0

62

29

66

0

0

51 ZAIRE

934

421 b

420

935

84

X

0

X+1018

421

X+1019

0

0

52 ZAMBIA

33.1

47.1

0

80.2

35.8

X

0

X+68.9

47.1

X+116

0

0

53 ZIMBABWE

13.1

5 b

4

14.1

0

X+5.9

0

X+19

5

X+20

0

0

TOTAL

3721

1517

1370

3988









C: Method of computing groundwater;
a = recharge of the aquifers;
b = baseflow of river system;
T: transboundary flow;
8: bordering river;
x: unknown:
...: negligible.

Figure 6: Water resources by country (all figures in km3/year)

Figure 7: Average annual rainfall


Contents - Previous - Next