CCP:GR-RI/04/3-Sup.1

COMMITTEE ON COMMODITY PROBLEMS

JOINT MEETING OF THE 30TH SESSION OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL GROUP ON GRAINS AND THE 41TH SESSION OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL GROUP ON RICE

Rome, 10-11 February 2004

FOLLOW-UP TO THE GUIDELINES FOR NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL ACTION ON RICE IN 2001-2003

SUPPLEMENT

Table of Contents


II. TABLES
Table I: Paddy support prices (2001/02 - 2003/04)
Table II: United States - Support to rice producers (1991/92 - 2002/03)
Table III: European Union - Import duties on long grain Indica rice (2001-2003)
Table IV: Rice food aid shipments (2000-2002)
Table V: Rice contributions to the WFP International Emergency Food Reserve and Protracted Relief and Recovery Operations (1995-2002)

 


I. GUIDELINES FOR NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL ACTION ON RICE 1

A. GENERAL OBJECTIVES OF INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION

(i)     Close cooperation to ensure food security of developing countries, as well as substantial progressive reductions in market distortive interference and a reduction of distortions and restrictions in the world rice market.

(ii)     The broad objective should be to achieve a balanced situation in production, consumption and trade in rice based on the following principles:

  1. action should be beneficial to the world rice economy and should result in a stable world rice market, with supplies expanding at a sufficient pace to meet rising demand;
     
  2. special consideration should be given both to the interests of developing and low-income food deficit countries, especially those where rice is a staple food and to those developing countries whose economies are heavily dependent on rice exports;
     
  3. interference with normal commercial trade should be minimized, and importers' choice of source of supplies should not be restricted;
     

  4. measures should aim at promoting consumption of rice, except in circumstances of rice shortages;
     

  5. efforts of developing countries to develop their rice production potential should be supported.

B. PRODUCTION POLICIES

(i)     Rice production policies should be sufficiently flexible to respond to new market situations. Domestic rice support policies should have minimal trade distortive effects and they should be harmonized with the Agriculture Agreement reached at the Uruguay Round.

(ii)     Rice exporting countries should, during periods of over-supply of rice on world markets, avoid adopting measures which encourage an increase in the production in rice, unless a shortage of other grains occurs on the world market which warrants an increase in production of rice.

(iii)     Developments in production policies and the measures taken to adjust supplies to demand on world markets should be subject to regular review by the Group so that if necessary, it may propose further remedial action.

(iv)     International aid giving agencies and bilateral donors should in a manner consistent with the general objectives of international cooperation, assist developing countries in their efforts to raise their productivity and production of rice by providing increased technical and financial aid.

C. TRADE POLICIES

(i)     Countries should not provide export subsidies to rice except in conformity with the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture. Specifically, developed and developing countries should reduce the budgetary outlay on export subsidies on rice as well as the quantity of subsidized rice exports as stipulated by the Round.

(ii)     Governments should provide information to the FAO Secretariat on the actual measures and reductions in rice subsidies undertaken so that these information could be consolidated and presented to the Group for its review and consultation for remedial action when any special difficulties arise.

(iii)     With a view to improving international knowledge of current market trends, countries with a substantial interest in world trade should develop informal contacts and liaison between rice trade specialists.

(iv)     In entering into longer term contracts for the exports and imports of rice, countries should consider that unforeseen shortages can occur in exporting countries, which may make it difficult for a full compliance of the contract. When these situations occur, bilateral consultations should be undertaken to ensure that the needs of the contracting parties could be met to the extent possible within the terms agreed in the Uruguay Round Final Act.

(v)     Governments are requested to use the opportunity offered in the Intergovernmental Group on Rice for the systematic exchange of information on trade policies, especially relating to the actions taken on improving market access and reducing export subsidies to enable the Group to keep developments in this field under regular review and to consult on proposals for remedial action when any special difficulties arise.

(vi)     Developed countries should, where appropriate, make efforts to implement, improve and enlarge GSP schemes for rice and to focus in particular on the needs of low income food deficit countries.

(vii)     Governments should consider assisting countries facing food, especially rice, shortages to obtain food aid in rice on grant terms or on highly concessional terms2 and to obtain short term assistance from international financial institutions for financing some levels of commercial imports.

(viii)     Within the framework of increased economic cooperation among developing countries and recognizing that the increase in import demand for rice in the coming years is likely to be mostly in the developing countries, governments concerned should make special efforts to encourage the expansion of trade among developing countries.

D. INTERNATIONAL FOOD AID POLICIES

(i)     Countries engaging in concessional or food aid transactions should follow the FAO procedures for notification, consultation and establishment of usual marketing requirements within the context of the FAO Principles of Surplus Disposal. In order to facilitate such procedures, exporting and importing countries should provide, if possible, to the FAO Secretariat - by latest March each year - export and import statistics on rice on a calendar year basis, distinguishing between commercial and food aid exports and imports respectively, and stating their destination (in the case of exports) and origin (in the case of imports).

(ii)     Countries should ensure that food aid should not be used to circumvent the commitments agreed in the Uruguay Round Final Act and to distort trade resulting in market displacement for developing exporting countries which do not have the means to finance similar concessional trade programmes. In this regard, food aid should not be tied and should, as far as possible, be on grant terms or on highly concessional terms.

(iii)     The greater use of rice in multilateral food aid schemes is favoured and where possible, such food aid should be channelled through the WFP.

(iv)     Multilateral aid-giving agencies, such as WFP, and bilateral donors, where possible and appropriate should increase food aid levels of rice and promote “triangular transactions" to the maximum extent possible while ensuring that the benefits of such transactions are equitably spread among developing exporting countries.

E. RICE RESERVES

(i)     Countries should take the opportunity, whenever the rice supply situation warrants, to evolve a concerted approach to the building and the holding of rice stocks, keeping in view the overall objectives of market stability and food security, as well as national targets.

(ii)     International aid-giving agencies and bilateral donors should help interested developing countries to increase their rice reserves and to secure the required financial and physical resources for this purpose, within the context of national policies, programmes and targets.

(iii)     Developed countries, where rice stocks have accumulated, should consider earmarking larger quantities for meeting emergency requirements, keeping in view the minimum target of 500 000 tonnes of cereals for the International Emergency Food Reserves.

(iv)     Countries where surplus stocks have accumulated should also consider applying a policy of reducing production and promoting the domestic use of the surplus rice.

F. GUIDELINES ON ENVIRONMENT

(i)     Countries should give due regard to the environmental implications of their policy actions in areas relating to rice production, trade and consumption.

(ii)     International financing institutions and bilateral donors should assist countries in their efforts to improve and expand upon the use and adoption of environmentally friendly policy measures.

(iii)     In encouraging developing countries to adopt environmentally friendly production, consumption and trade measures, international financing institutions and bilateral donors should give due consideration to the economic impact of these measures, especially on countries' costs of production and, in consequence, their competitiveness. Where possible, therefore, rice project proposals on environmental concerns should be based inter alia on an economic assessment of their impact.

(iv)     Countries should ensure that the pursuit of improved environmental practices should not be used to circumvent the agreements on reducing trade barriers reached in the Uruguay Round.

(v)     With a view to enabling the FAO Secretariat to improve the exchange of information on different aspects of environmental problems and policy developments concerning rice and the monitoring and dissemination of related environmental technology, countries should develop close contacts with the FAO Secretariat and provide it with the necessary information.

___________________________

1 As adopted by the Group in 1971 and subsequently revised in 1979, 1994 and 1996.

2 i.e on terms no less concessional than those provided for in Article IV at the Food Aid Convention in 1986.

 


II. TABLES

Table I: Paddy support prices (2001/02 - 2003/04)

Table II: United States - Support to rice producers (1991/92 - 2002/03)

Table III: European Union - Import duties on long grain Indica rice (2001-2003)

Table IV: Rice food aid shipments (2000-2002)

Table V: Rice contributions to the WFP International Emergency Food Reserve and Protracted Relief and Recovery Operations (1995-2002)


  

TABLE I : PADDY SUPPORT PRICES (2001/02 - 2003/04)
 

COUNTRIES

LOCAL CURRENCY PER TONNE

US $ PER TONNE

NOMINAL PRICES

REAL PRICES

(deflated by CPI 1995/96=100)

NOMINAL PRICES

DEVELOPING

CURRENCY

2001/02

2002/03

2003/04

2001/02

2002/03

2003/04

2001/02

2002/03

2003/04

Exporters

China: Semi-late crop

Yuan renminbi

1060

1040

1040

p

. . .

. . .

. . .

128

126

126

Late crop

Yuan renminbi

1080

1020

1020

p

. . .

. . .

. . .

131

123

123

India: Common

Rupee

5300

5300

1/

5500

3591

3437

3414

110

110

120

Grade A

Rupee

5600

5600

1/

5800

3794

3632

3600

117

116

126

Pakistan: Irri

Rupee

5125

5125

-

3522

3410

-

82

87

-

Basmati

Rupee

9625

9625

-

6615

6404

-

155

163

-

Thailand: 5% broken

Baht

5235

5235

5235

4168

4158

4087

119

121

129

Fragrant

Baht

6500

6800

7000

5175

5401

5464

148

157

173

Importers

Bangladesh

Taka

8204

8400

8400

p

6267

6255

6074

144

145

145

Brazil

Real

140

2/

132

2/

132

2/

94

83

71

68

56

38

Costa Rica

‘000 Colón

85

85

85

42

39

36

258

236

215

Indonesia

‘000 Rupiah

1519

1519

1725

628

546

578

149

154

193

Iran, Rep. Of

‘000 Rial

2700

3/

4000

3/

4300

3/

994

1292

1189

1540

579

528

Korea, Rep. of

‘000 Won

1510

1510

1480

p

1194

1162

1103

1165

1236

1286

Malaysia

Ringgit

798

4/

798

4/

798

4/

675

666

657

210

210

210

Philippines

Peso

9000

9000

9000

6061

5859

5689

175

179

169

Sri Lanka

Rupee

7420

7420

. . .

4347

3966

. . .

86

78

. . .

Turkey

Million Lira

480

700

800

19

20

18

326

424

576

DEVELOPED

CURRENCY

2001/02

2002/03

2003/04

2001/02

2002/03

2003/04

2001/02

2002/03

2003/04

European Union

Euro

298

298

298

257

252

245

272

293

335

Japan

‘000 Yen

245

5/

238

5/

. . .

243

238

. . .

1925

1949

. . .

United States

US $

143

6/

143

6/

143

6/

123

121

119

143

143

143


P: provisional; …: not available; – : not applicable;

1/Subject to an additional Special Drought Relief (SDR) payment of Rs. 200 / tonne 4/ Including a subsidy of RM 250 / tonne of paddy delivered to a licensed mill

2/ Paddy long grain rice, South, Southeast, Northeast and Centre West Regions. 5/ Government purchase price, husked rice basis.

3/ For variety Nemata and Neda. 6/ Marketing Assistance Loan Rate

 

TABLE II: UNITED STATES – SUPPORT TO RICE PRODUCERS (1991/92 – 2002/03)
 

Season

Season Average Market Price

Target Price

Loan Rate

Loan
Benefits

3/

Deficiency/Contract Payments

Paddy
(All Average)

Milled Long Grain

Milled Short/Medium Grain

Milled Brokens

Payment
Rate

Total Deficiency/ Contract Payments

Aug/Jul

US$/Tonne

US$/Tonne

US$/Tonne

Million US$

US$/Tonne

Million US$

1991/92

167

236

143

236

215

118

84

68

458

1992/93

130

236

143

236

215

118

288

93

614

1993/94

176

236

143

236

215

118

270

88

571

1994/95

149

236

143

236

214

118

117

84

558

1995/96

202

236

143

236

214

118

0

71

471

1996/97

220

1/

143

237

215

119

0

61 4/

455

1997/98

214

1/

143

236

214

118

0

60

448

1998/99

196

1/

143

236

214

118

14

96 5/

717

1999/00

131

1/

143

235

213

118

401

124 5/

930

2000/01

124

1/

143

236

214

118

598

119 5/

897

2001/02

94

1/

143

236

214

118

713

99 5/

750

2002/03

93

231 2/

143

235

213

118

699

88 6/

730


Source: USDA

1/ From 1996/97 eliminated under the FAIR Act.

2/ Authorized by the Food Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002.

3/ Loan benefits include loan deficiency payments (LDPs), marketing loan gains (MLGs) and commodity certificate gains.

4/ Deficiency payment rate up to 1995/96; contract payment rate from 1996/97.

5/ Includes supplemental Production Flexibility Contracts (PFC) payments of US$ 32/tonne in 1998/99, US$ 62/tonne in 1999/00, US$ 62/tonne in 2000/01 and US$ 53/tonne in 2001/02.

6/ Direct payment rate under the 2002 Farm Act plus counter-cyclical payment rate of US$ 36/tonne.

 

TABLE III: EUROPEAN UNION - IMPORT DUTIES ON LONG GRAIN INDICA RICE (2001-2003)
 

  

THIRD

COUNTRIES

ACP 1/ 

BANGLADESH 

INDIA and PAKISTAN

BASMATI

EGYPT 

 

Husked

Milled

Husked

Milled

Husked

Milled

Husked

Milled

Husked

Milled

Husked

Milled

Husked

Husked

Milled

Husked

Milled

 

(Euro/MT)

(US$/MT)

(Euro/MT)

(US$/MT)

(Euro/MT)

(US$/MT)

(Euro/MT)

(US$/MT)

(Euro/MT)

(US$/MT)

2001

232.48

416.00

207.12

370.22

77.03

133.21

68.63

118.55

111.90

193.09

99.70

171.84

10.06

9.01

174.43

312.00

155.40

277.66

2002

264.00

416.00

249.22

392.70

88.06

133.21

83.13

125.75

127.66

193.09

120.51

182.28

14.00

13.22

198.00

312.00

186.91

294.53

2003 2/

262.37

416.00

294.56

467.03

87.49

133.21

98.22

149.55

126.84

193.09

142.40

216.78

12.55

14.09

196.78

312.00

220.92

350.27

Jan.

264.00

416.00

280.34

441.75

88.06

133.21

93.51

141.46

127.66

193.09

135.56

205.04

14.00

14.87

198.00

312.00

210.26

331.32

Feb.

264.00

416.00

284.39

448.13

88.06

133.21

94.86

143.50

127.66

193.09

137.52

208.00

14.00

15.08

198.00

312.00

213.29

336.10

Mar.

264.00

416.00

285.22

449.44

88.06

133.21

95.14

143.92

127.66

193.09

137.92

208.61

14.00

15.13

198.00

312.00

213.92

337.08

Apr.

264.00

416.00

286.33

451.19

88.06

133.21

95.51

144.48

127.66

193.09

138.46

209.43

14.00

15.18

198.00

312.00

214.75

338.39

May

264.00

416.00

305.38

481.20

88.06

133.21

101.86

154.09

127.66

193.09

147.67

223.35

14.00

16.19

198.00

312.00

229.03

360.90

Jun.

264.00

416.00

307.87

485.13

88.06

133.21

102.69

155.35

127.66

193.09

148.87

225.18

14.00

16.33

198.00

312.00

230.90

363.85

Jul.

264.00

416.00

300.20

473.05

88.06

133.21

100.14

151.48

127.66

193.09

145.17

219.57

14.00

15.92

198.00

312.00

225.15

354.79

Aug.

258.96

416.00

288.06

462.74

86.30

133.21

95.99

148.18

125.14

193.09

139.20

214.78

9.33

10.38

194.22

312.00

216.04

347.05

Sep.

251.81

416.00

282.45

466.63

83.80

133.21

93.99

149.42

121.56

193.09

136.35

216.59

3.40

3.81

188.85

312.00

211.83

349.97

Oct.

264.00

416.00

309.59

487.84

88.06

133.21

103.27

156.22

127.66

193.09

149.71

226.44

14.00

16.42

198.00

312.00

232.20

365.88

Nov.

263.29

416.00

310.26

490.21

87.81

133.21

103.48

156.97

127.31

193.09

150.02

227.54

13.29

15.66

197.47

312.00

232.70

367.66


Source: EU Commission.

1/ African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States.

2/ Jan.-Nov

 

TABLE IV: RICE FOOD AID SHIPMENTS (2000-2002)
 

Donor Countries

2000

2001

2002

Jan-Jun

Jul-Dec

Total

Jan-Jun

Jul-Dec

Total

Jan-Jun

Jul-Dec

Total

Thousand tonnes

Australia

35

12

47

14

10

24

25

33

58

China

29

28

57

18

60

78

18

74

92

EC & National Action

67

76

143

57

72

129

155

73

228

Japan

102

208

310

453

352

805

71

60

131

Korea Rep.

0

149

149

0

0

0

0

358

358

United States

137

327

464

66

192

258

84

324

408

Others

13

4

17

22

15

37

13

95

108

TOTAL *

383

804

1187

630

701

1331

366

1017

1383

of which:
Triangular Transactions

169

175

97


Source: WFP Interfais, 2003

* Shipments from Channel Organizations not included.

 

TABLE V : RICE CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE WFP INTERNATIONAL EMERGENCY FOOD RESERVE AND PROTRACTED RELIEF AND RECOVERY OPERATIONS (1995 – 2002)
 

INTERNATIONAL EMERGENCY

FOOD RESERVE

PROTRACTED RELIEF AND

RECOVERY OPERATIONS

tonnes

‘000 US$

tonnes

‘000 US$

1995

31 304

9 565

73 901

19 891

1996

105 422

28 307

67 226

18 257

1997

131 203

43 752

41 884

10 158

1998

227 353

68 457

62 787

13 497

1999

95 953

27 256

63 737

17 835

2000

675 434

151 805

192 415

47 256

2001

37 583

8 041

155 784

28 097

2002

47 489

11 719

123 238

22 718


Source: WFP