| Table 6. Types of formulated feed used, their advantages and disadvantages and the type of processing | |||||
| Type of feed | Advantages | Disadvantages | Moisture (% max) | Processing techniques | |
| Farm-made feed | |||||
| Trash fish | Low cost depending on the location. No energy requirement. Pallatable. | Very expensive in some locations. Must be used immediately. High FCR. Negative environmental impact. Risk of spreading fish diseases. Source of pollution. | Chopped and minced trash fish | ||
| Dry� | No energy requirement (pellets can be made by hand with a meat mincer and then sun dried); vitamins preserved. Feeds available on site. Easy to make. Utilize local waste products. Dry feed lasts longer than moist feeds. | Starches not cooked and not very digestible; Low water stability (additional binder may be required);shorter storage period; High FCR; large surface required for drying. Moist feed can not be stored and must to be used immediately. | Dry pellet 10% and moist diet 30% | Wet dough extruded through a meat mincer and sun dried | Wet feed extruding line |
| Moist | Hand made dough | ||||
| Industrially manufactured pellet | |||||
| Sinking | Good water stability. Cheaper than floating pellets and so lower capital costs. | Dry ingredients required; vitamins partially lost. Generally higher FCR than floating pellet.Fish feeding can not be observed. | 10% | Compressed pellet | Compressed pellet line |
| Steam treated compressed pellet | Steam-treated compressed pellet line | ||||
| Floating / slow sinking | Best water stability; best FCR; many anti-nutritional factors removed with heat. | Extruders more expensive and so high production cost. Requires more skill in production. Fish feeding can be observed. | 10% | Extruded/Expanded pellet | Extruded/expanded pellet line |
| Microdiets | |||||
| Microbound | Powdered ingredients in a water stable matrix (e.g.: agar, carrageenan, calcium alginate, casein, zein) | ||||
| Microencapsulated | The protein membrane may be difficult to digest | ||||