The quality of institutions, legal frameworks and policies -as well
as their governance dimensions- is a key factor affecting the
sustainable management of water resources.
While
acknowledgment of the importance of the political and institutional
context is commonplace, the assessment of these enabling and
constraining factors for sector-level policies and related external
support is an area where experiences are only gradually accumulating.
Therefore, this tool aims at identifying how can improvements in the
quality, cost-effectiveness and accessibility of water resources for
agriculture and energy be brought about, and more importantly,
sustained over time.
With that purpose, the tool facilitates
the analysis of the different institutional, legal and policy aspects
that affect the development of water resources for agriculture and
energy production; it also allows the identification of
reforms/actions to overcome obstacles to such development.
An
integral part of the tool is a public/donor budget analysis that
helps assess policies and programmes introduced in/by a country in
terms of implementation of political commitments towards objectives
and targets.
The analysis includes a set of indicators (see
table below) to assess public and donor expenditure allocations in
terms of:
-
Strategic priorities and political commitment:
Indicators aim to illustrate the investment priorities and political commitments assigned by the government
and donors to irrigation and hydropower investment in: a)
agricultural policy; b) energy policy; c) in the international
agreed goals and targets.
-
Efficiency of the public spending in the irrigation and hydropower sector:
Indicators aim to show: (2.1) the degree of decentralization and
participation of the governance of the sector; (2.2) the timely
utilization of budgetary appropriations as an indicator of
efficiency of governance and the credibility of the budget. These
indicators are used to produce an index that highlights the public
and donor investment priorities and commitment to water management
for agriculture and hydropower the so called ?Institutional and
Policy Index (IPoI)? that is visually represented with a radar
graph.
IPoI is the geometric average of the value of the
following six indicators: a) irrigation projects budget in
agricultural public budget (IPBA), b) hydropower projects budget
in energy public budget (HPBE); c) irrigation projects budget in
total public budget (IPB); c) hydropower projects budget in total
public budget (HPB); e) irrigation projects budget in total donor
budget (IDB); and f) hydropower projects budget in total donor
budget (HDB).
PUBLIC AND DONOR EXPENDITURE ALLOCATION
1. STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND COMMITMENTS OF GOVERNMENT AND DONORS
- Irrigation projects budget in agricultural public budget (%);
- Hydropower projects budget in energy public budget (%);
- Irrigation projects budget in total public budget (%);
- Hydropower projects budget in total public budget (%);
- Irrigation projects budget in total donor budget (%).
- Hydropower projects budget in total donor budget (%).
2. EFFICIENCY OF PUBLIC SPENDING
2.1. Decentralization and participation
- Share of public spending in irrigation by:
- Central government units (%)
- Regional government units (%)
- Local government units (%)
- Share of public spending in hydropower by:
- Central government units (%)
- Regional government units (%)
- Local government units (%)
2.2. Timely utilization of budgetary appropriations
- Share of actual spending on planned public spending for irrigation projects (%)
- Share of actual spending on planned public spending for hydropower projects (%)