Nature-Based Solutions for Agricultural Water Management and Food Security

Sonneveld, B.G.J.S. Merbis, M.D. Alfarra, A. & Ünver, O. and Arnal, M.A

Nature-Based Solutions for Agricultural Water Management and Food Security

Year of publication 2018

Place of publication Rome, Italy ;

Pages 69

Author Sonneveld, B.G.J.S. Merbis, M.D. Alfarra, A. & Ünver, O. and Arnal, M.A

Publisher FAO ;

Product type Book (series)

ISBN 978-92-5-131125-7

Series title FAO Land and Water Discussion Papers

Series number 12

Edition 1

Full item page

Synopsis (short abstract) Accessibility to clean and sufficient water resources for agriculture is key in feeding the steadily increasing world population in a sustainable manner. Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) offer a promising contribution to enhance availability and quality of water for productive purposes and human consumption, while simultaneously striving to preserve the integrity and intrinsic value of the ecosystems. Implementing successful NBS for water management, however, is not an easy task since many ecosystems are already severely degraded, and exploited beyond their regenerative capacity. Furthermore, ecosystems are large and complex and the many stakeholders involved might have conflicting interests. Hence, implementation of NBS requires a structured and comprehensive approach that starts with the valuation of the services provided by the ecosystem. The whole set of use and non-use values, in monetary terms, provides a factual basis to guide the implementation of NBS, which ideally is done according to transdisciplinary principles, i.e. complemented with scientific and case-specific knowledge of the eco-system in an adaptive decision-making process that involves the relevant stakeholders. This discussion paper evaluated twenty-one NBS case studies using a non-representative sample, to learn from successful and failed experiences and to identify possible causalities among factors that characterize the implementation of NBS. The case studies give a minor role to valuation of ecosystem services, an area for which the literature is still developing guidance. Less successful water management projects tend to suffer from inadequate factual and scientific basis and uncoordinated or insufficient stakeholder involvement and lack of long term planning. Successful case studies point to satisfactory understanding of the functioning of ecosystems and importance of multi-stakeholder platforms, well-identified funding schemes, realistic monitoring and evaluation systems and endurance of its promoters.

Read on Google Books and buy online

Language English

Related items

Showing items related by metadata.

Presentation

Nature Based Solutions seem to Provide the Ultimate Answer for a Sustainable Water Management
Webinar 5: Nature-based solutions for agricultural water management and food security
2018

Also available in:

No results found.

Implementing successful NBS for water resource management is not an easy task, since many ecosystems are already severely degraded, and exploited beyond their regenerative capacity. Ecosystems are often large and complex and the impact of interventions can only be assessed and analysed at a system-wide level. As a rule many stakeholders are involved, as owner, user or caretaker, each with their own set of interests and values. Therefore, simple market-based solutions such as partitioning the ecosystem, attributing property rights and applying the polluter-pay-principle are not sufficient for getting a viable strategy. Indeed, Implementation of NBS would require a far more structured and comprehensive approach, that starts with the valuation of the eco-services provided by the ecosystem.
Article

Going back to nature: Green Care as an emerging field for nature-based innovation and entrepreneurship in Europe
XV World Forestry Congress, 2-6 May 2022
2022

Also available in:

No results found.

The negative effects of the current societal and environmental challenges on human health and wellbeing are of growing concern. Nature and ecosystem-based approaches such as Green Care can offer a wide range of solutions to mitigate these negative effects. Green care is an emerging concept referring to the health and well-being benefits of activities carried out in contact with nature. By focusing on four thematic sectors – Forest-based care, Social agriculture, Urban green care, and Green care tourism – the Green4C multidisciplinary EC funded research portrays the complex picture of the solutions offered by social and nature-based innovation and entrepreneurship in the Green Care sector in Europe (www.greenforcare.eu). The research aims to a) understand the entrepreneurship needs of the stakeholders involved in the sector and b) assess success factors and challenges for innovation in Green Care. The research employs qualitative data collection methods, namely academic and grey literature review, an online questionnaire, and in-depth interviews with the innovative case studies and best practices operating in four thematic sectors. The results show that there is a clear trend of growing interest and participation in Green Care, strengthened in the current context of the global pandemic, yet the challenges in different countries indicate uneven entrepreneurship and innovation capacity. Gaps in policies, institutional and governance frameworks, quality assurance, and collaborative arrangements were identified as important challenges. The research concludes that the Green Care innovation and entrepreneurship that integrate sustainably managed green spaces with a focus on health and well-being can contribute to healthier and more resilient human societies and natural ecosystems. Recommendations for different stakeholder groups, including policy-makers, are detailed in the EU Blueprint on Green Care. Keywords: green care, health, well-being, innovation, entrepreneurship ID: 3486896
Book (series)

Ecosystem restoration and inland food fisheries in developing countries
Opportunities for the United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (2021–2030)
2023

Also available in:

No results found.

The review presents the strong business case for inland food fisheries in developing countries to be either a co-benefit, or very often the main benefit, of ecosystem restoration. In view of the current state of inland water aquatic habitats the potential for restoration is high. Realizing this potential requires concerted action to overcome current challenges, foremost of which is the invisibility of inland fisheries in many policy arenas as well as technical and scientific fora. The drivers of ecosystem degradation, ecosystem services valuation frameworks and the main technical tools for implementing interventions are presented. Experiences in developed countries dominate the literature but are not necessarily applicable to developing country inland food fisheries. Local communities that have high dependency on inland fisheries and live in close association with inland water fisheries habitats not only provide much higher fisheries values but a management asset that is unavailable in developed countries and the mainstay of many successful restoration programmes. Ten case studies, representing effective restoration of food fisheries from local to basin scale are used to illustrate what can be achieved. The prospects of inland fisheries benefiting from, or contributing to, the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (2021–2030) are good but upscaling the existing progress will require increased and sustained efforts to mainstream the values of inland fisheries including their co-benefits for biodiversity conservation.