|
|
|
|
|
1. At its Eleventh Session, the Intergovernmental Group on Citrus Fruit, after reviewing the demand prospects for fresh citrus fruit, agreed "that there was potential for demand expansion in markets of Eastern Europe and the area of the former USSR". The Group concluded that continued economic growth was a prerequisite for further expansion of citrus markets in these countries. It was concluded that the Secretariat should attach high priority to monitoring the market situation and outlook for citrus fruit and products in these countries.
2. For this reason, a first attempt has been made to analyse market developments and outlook for citrus fruit in these countries. Poland and the Russian Federation constitute the two most important citrus markets among those covered in this report. While the Russian Federation accounted for about 1.5 percent of world citrus imports in 1992, by 1996 the figure reached 5.4 percent. Between 1992 and 1996 the Russian Federation enjoyed an import growth rate of 39 percent. Poland imported 3.3 percent of world citrus imports in 1992, but in 1996 that percentage had only reached 3.5 percent.
3. Neither of these important potential emerging markets have come up to expectations as per caput consumption remains low, particularly in the Russian Federation, at 3.0 kg in 1996, while it has barely grown in Poland, where it now stands at 7.62 kg per caput. However, the situation is certainly not to be viewed pessimistically. Citrus marketing chains in both countries are developing, new groups with more sophisticated marketing skills are now engaged in the trade, and per caput income growth, particularly in Poland, should encourage further growth.
4. Subsequent to the liberalization of the Polish market in the late 1980s, citrus imports showed a rapid increase, but between 1992 and 1996 imports rose by 12 percent. Per caput consumption has risen by 800 grams between 1992 and 1996.
5. Citrus imports arrive by ship or truck, depending on the quantities required. Transport cost varies widely, with ship transport being considerably cheaper. For example, transport cost from Spain by refrigerated trucks amounts to DM 0.35 per kg (US cents 21/kg) compared to DM 0.10 per kg (US cents 6/kg) by ship. Consumer packs are small, partly due to consumer preferences and due to low levels of personal income. South Poland is mainly supplied by Greece and Italy, while Central and North Poland receive fruit from Spain. There are only minimal imports of citrus juices. Concentrates are imported, mainly from Brazil and Germany (re-export) for orange, and from the Netherlands (re-export) and the United States for grapefruit. Single strength juices are produced and retailed in Poland.
Table 1 - Poland: Citrus imports and per caput consumption, 1992-96
1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | |
IMPORTS | 000 tonnes | ||||
Citrus | 261.7 | 252.3 | 252.7 | 278.6 | 294.1 |
kg/year | |||||
PER CAPUT | |||||
Citrus | 6.83 | 6.57 | 6.56 | 7.23 | 7.62 |
6. Looking at individual types of citrus, import growth has varied considerably among types. Between 1992 and 1996 total citrus imports rose by 12 percent, but oranges declined by 28 percent, tangerines rose by 151 percent, grapefruit rose by 55 percent and lemons rose by 5 percent. Imports into Poland of citrus by variety between 1992 and 1996 are shown in Table 2.
7. Apart from grapefruit, where the largest supplier is Israel, Spain remained the dominant supplier of citrus during the 1992-96 period. In the case of tangerines and oranges, Morocco played a role as a growing supplier, as did Argentina for lemons. The value of citrus imports rose by 8.5 percent between 1992 and 1996, to a total of US$80.4 million. Import unit values in terms of US dollars for oranges rose only two percent between 1992 and 1996, from US$251 to US$256 per tonne, but the Zloty import price rose by 69 percent and retail prices almost doubled.
Table 2 - Poland: Volume and value of citrus imports by origin, 1992-96
|
|
1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 |
000 tonnes | million US$ | US$/tonne | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
ORANGES | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | 133 | 105 | 91 | 109 | 95 | 33 | 27 | 19 | 25 | 24 | 251 | 253 | 210 | 226 | 257 | |
of which: | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spain | 57 | 79 | 66 | 85 | 64 | 15 | 20 | 14 | 19 | 16 | 267 | 247 | 216 | 223 | 253 | |
Greece | 33 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 191 | 226 | 216 | 222 | 307 | |
Italy | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 277 | 298 | 246 | 231 | 283 | |
S. Africa | 1 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 338 | 379 | 262 | 300 | 335 | |
Morocco | 2 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 252 | 206 | 129 | 179 | 217 | |
Turkey | 5 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | - | ... | 0 | 279 | 295 | - | - | 275 | |
Uruguay | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 290 | 195 | 202 | 189 | 203 | |
Others | 36 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 277 | 228 | 224 | 212 | 247 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
LEMONS | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | 74 | 72 | 66 | 74 | 77 | 23 | 21 | 18 | 20 | 23 | 316 | 291 | 264 | 264 | 302 | |
of which: | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spain | 30 | 63 | 53 | 59 | 56 | 10 | 18 | 14 | 15 | 18 | 316 | 290 | 267 | 262 | 321 | |
Greece | 3 | 1 | - | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | - | 1 | 1 | 214 | 268 | - | 283 | 317 | |
Italy | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 327 | 330 | 279 | 257 | 305 | |
S. Africa | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 323 | 442 | 249 | 485 | 494 | |
Morocco | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Turkey | 19 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 327 | 283 | 243 | 256 | 250 | |
Uruguay | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 326 | 255 | 268 | 216 | 381 | |
Argentina | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 319 | 379 | 229 | 198 | 212 | |
Others | 8 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 312 | 276 | 275 | 308 | 377 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
TANGERINES | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | 37 | 64 | 77 | 73 | 93 | 12 | 18 | 19 | 19 | 26 | 311 | 282 | 250 | 260 | 279 | |
of which: | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spain | 14 | 35 | 44 | 47 | 47 | 5 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 353 | 308 | 264 | 261 | 285 | |
Greece | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 299 | 293 | 272 | 251 | 286 | |
Italy | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 415 | 308 | 265 | 267 | 281 | |
S. Africa | - | 0 | - | 1 | 2 | - | 0 | - | 0 | 1 | - | 359 | - | 508 | 354 | |
Morocco | 5 | 17 | 21 | 14 | 23 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 289 | 219 | 204 | 244 | 246 | |
Turkey | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 304 | 298 | 291 | 319 | 298 | |
Uruguay | 0 | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | 1 | 438 | - | 265 | 240 | 400 | |
Others | 7 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 231 | 268 | 286 | 256 | 313 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
GRAPEFRUIT | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | 18 | 11 | 18 | 23 | 29 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 322 | 245 | 186 | 212 | 236 | |
of which: | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spain | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 356 | 306 | 233 | 270 | 288 | |
Israel | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 224 | 111 | 165 | 188 | 238 | |
S. Africa | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 258 | 187 | 178 | 230 | 207 | |
Cyprus | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 314 | 244 | 187 | 195 | 225 | |
Turkey | 6 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 342 | 252 | 187 | 199 | 229 | |
Cuba | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 407 | 314 | 272 | 372 | 201 | |
Others | 4 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 287 | 227 | 116 | 145 | 235 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
TOTAL CITRUS | 262 | 252 | 253 | 279 | 294 | 74 | 68 | 59 | 68 | 80 | 283 | 271 | 235 | 244 | 273 |
Table 3 - Poland: Import and retail prices, 1993-96
April 1993 | April 1994 | April 1995 | April 1996 | |
Import price, Zloty/kg | 0.45 | 0.48 | 0.55 | 0.76 |
Retail price, Zloty/kg | 1.76 | 2.34 | 2.80 | 3.63 |
8. The general MFN rate is 15 percent for oranges, with a 10.5 percent preferential rate for supplying countries having an average GDP lower than that of Poland or for least developed countries; a 20 percent rate on tangerines, with a 14 percent preferential rate; a 10 percent rate on lemons, with a 7 percent preferential rate; and a 15 percent rate on grapefruit, with a 10.5 percent preferential rate.
Table 4 - Poland: Import duties and taxes
MFN Rate
% |
Preferential Rate
% |
|
Oranges | 15 | 10.5 |
Tangerines | 20 | 14 |
Lemons | 10 | 7 |
Grapefruit | 15 | 10.5 |
Frozen concentrated orange juice | ||
Density exceeding 1.33 gm/cm3 at 20º | 50 | Not applicable |
Density under 1.33 gm/cm3 at 20º | 30 | Not applicable |
Grapefruit juice | ||
Density exceeding 1.33 gm/cm3 at 20º | 50 | Not applicable |
Value exceeding ECU 30 per 100 kg net weight and added sugar content exceeding 30% by weight | 30 | Not applicable |
Single strength citrus juice | ||
Density exceeding 1.33 gm/cm3 at 20º | 50 | Not applicable |
Single strength citrus juice containing added sugar | 30 | Not applicable |
Lemon juice | 30 | Not applicable |
Other citrus juices | 30 | Not applicable |
9. The Russian Federations citrus imports fell subsequent to the break-up of the USSR. However, there was a rapid recovery in 1993 to around 287 000 tonnes and by 1994 a record of almost 680 000 tonnes was reached. However, after the 1994 peak, citrus imports and consumption started to decline. A slow-down in economic growth accompanied by increasing unemployment and lower purchasing power led to a drop in citrus imports in 1995 by 22 percent and a further smaller reduction in 1996 by 4.1 percent to reach 444 000 tonnes. Indications for the first quarter of 1997 are that a slight recovery could be possible. During the first three months of 1997 citrus imports were 4 percent above the level during the same period of the previous year.
10. Per caput consumption has risen rapidly, peaking in 1994. There was a reduction in citrus intake in 1995 and a further small decrease to around 3 kg/head in 1996.
11. Considering the imports of individual types of citrus from 1992 to 1996 there was a significant growth of all varieties to 1994 and then a sharp decrease in 1995. However, while orange imports declined by 27 percent in 1995 and 23 percent in 1996, other citrus varieties returned to higher levels. For instance, imports of tangerines increased by 64 percent compared to 1994, to the highest level ever reached (in 1996).
Table 5 - Russian Federation: Citrus imports by variety and per caput
consumption, 1996-96
1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | |
metric tonnes | |||||
IMPORTS | |||||
Total Citrus | 118 880 | 286 879 | 629 137 | 466 731 | 443 841 |
Oranges | 80 000 | 200 000 | 458 397 | 332 434 | 257 568 |
Tangerines | 1 000 | 21 000 | 58 703 | 51 638 | 96 489 |
Lemons | 8 130 | 53 000 | 79 388 | 65 973 | 70 675 |
Grapefruit | 29 740 | 12 000 | 28 074 | 16 686 | 18 843 |
Citrus n.e.s. | 10 | 879 | 4 575 | - | 266 |
kg/year | |||||
PER CAPUT | |||||
Total Citrus | 0.80 | 1.93 | 4.23 | 3.14 | 3.00 |
12. Imports of citrus by origin during 1994-96 are shown in Table 6. In 1994 Greece was by far the largest supplier of citrus fruit to the Russian Federation, accounting for almost 30 percent, followed by Turkey and the Netherlands as a re-exporter, supplying about 8 percent each. In 1996, Greece remained the largest supplier, with a share of 28 percent, but Turkeys share rose significantly to 18 percent. Other citrus producing countries like China, Israel, Morocco and Spain increased their combined shipments to the Russian Federation from 15 percent in 1994 to 27 percent in 1996. During the period, supplies from re-exporters were increasingly substituted by imports directly from producing countries.
13. Despite declining volumes, Greece remained the dominant supplier of oranges between 1994 and 1996; however, imports from Turkey and Israel continued to grow during the same period. By 1996 Greece accounted for 43 percent of the orange market, Israel ten percent and Turkey twelve percent.
14. As regards tangerines, China remained the major supplier with a market share of 28 percent in 1996, followed by Turkey, Georgia, Morocco and Spain, which together accounted for 52 percent of the market.
15. In the case of lemons, Turkey with 29 percent and Greece with 20 percent of the market, were the two most important suppliers.
16. In grapefruit, Israel, Turkey, and Cyprus together supplied 69 percent of consumption in 1996. In 1994 Cuba held 60 percent of the market but by 1996 it accounted for only 0.04 percent. Cuba in the earlier years was particularly competitive in grapefruit supplies, both white and red. However, the quantities shipped were often too large, depressing prices and reducing profits in the import and wholesale chain.
17. Data on juice imports are not readily available, but based on information for 1994 and 1995, it would appear that substantial imports of orange juice are in consumer packs of single strength, rather than in concentrates for further processing. Good quality non-concentrated orange juices which are imported, are generally only available in up-market supermarkets. One litre bottles may cost US$6 and more at retail.
Table 5 - Russian Federation: Volume and value of citrus, imports by origin, 1994-96
1994 | 1995 | 1996 | |
1994 | 1995 | 1996 | |
|
tonnes | 000 US$ | |||||||
ORANGES | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | 458 397 | 332 434 | 257 568 | |
222 192 | 164 038 | 109 686 | |
of which : | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Argentina | 3 568 | 1 300 | 2 389 | |
1 668 | 584 | 1 068 | |
China | 9 390 | 3 781 | 1 996 | |
4 726 | 1 890 | 906 | |
Cuba | 13 870 | 3 162 | 19 | |
4 851 | 988 | 14 | |
Cyprus | 30 426 | 15 000 | 12 971 | |
7 247 | 8 114 | 8 731 | |
Egypt | 9 789 | 6 099 | 10 208 | |
4 078 | 3 257 | 4 300 | |
Finland | 8 079 | 1 622 | 49 | |
6 980 | 1 244 | 47 | |
Germany | 5 518 | 1 853 | 321 | |
4 002 | 1 152 | 154 | |
Greece | 182 275 | 141 862 | 110 436 | |
78 201 | 60 361 | 39 991 | |
Israel | 12 880 | 25 604 | 26 798 | |
6 926 | 13 798 | 11 113 | |
Italy | 2 894 | 1 490 | 1 686 | |
1 458 | 718 | 732 | |
Latvia | 8 869 | 19 660 | - | |
5 792 | 13 161 | - | |
Morocco | 19 601 | 3 644 | 15 022 | |
11 744 | 2 004 | 6 250 | |
Netherlands | 30 554 | 25 761 | 5 421 | |
17 790 | 14 324 | 2 255 | |
Poland | 10 415 | 5 748 | 284 | |
5 926 | 3 689 | 216 | |
Spain | 14 300 | 4 654 | 7 702 | |
7 363 | 2 235 | 3 579 | |
South Africa | - | 17 682 | 18 355 | |
- | 9 234 | 8 545 | |
Turkey | 23 999 | 18 779 | 30 718 | |
11 789 | 8 610 | 13 304 | |
Uruguay | 24 535 | 12 227 | 2 519 | |
12 223 | 6 144 | 1 428 | |
TANGERINES | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | 58 703 | 51 368 | 96 489 | |
42 602 | 32 578 | 42 523 | |
of which : | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
China | 18 456 | 17 590 | 27 218 | |
9 906 | 8 369 | 10 129 | |
Georgia | 7 930 | 3 113 | 15 603 | |
4 487 | 2 677 | 8 110 | |
Germany | 1 571 | 1 481 | 62 | |
1 501 | 1 030 | 19 | |
Greece | 1 347 | 1 146 | 1 606 | |
1 212 | 841 | 1 146 | |
Morocco | 3 185 | 920 | 5 329 | |
2 933 | 779 | 2 297 | |
Netherlands | 7 889 | 8 207 | 1 931 | |
7 758 | 6 144 | 1 081 | |
Poland | 1 064 | 481 | 37 | |
1 019 | 460 | 13 | |
Spain | 1 824 | 821 | 4 954 | |
1 599 | 612 | 2 549 | |
Turkey | 4 508 | 8 666 | 24 839 | |
2 680 | 3 816 | 8 337 | |
LEMONS | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | 79 388 | 65 973 | 70 765 | |
53 381 | 39 152 | 36 086 | |
of which : | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
China | 1 226 | 639 | 486 | |
710 | 382 | 217 | |
Cyprus | 6 825 | 3 730 | 4 032 | |
4 707 | 2 296 | 2 950 | |
Finland | 3 938 | 1 081 | 41 | |
3 909 | 944 | 27 | |
Germany | 1 738 | 2 522 | 619 | |
1 467 | 1 364 | 240 | |
Greece | 20 329 | 16 226 | 13 946 | |
11 683 | 8 349 | 6 623 | |
Italy | 1 035 | 3 123 | 4 771 | |
677 | 1 984 | 2 442 | |
Netherlands | 9 511 | 13 463 | 3 310 | |
7 612 | 9 327 | 1 787 | |
Spain | 3 462 | 1 554 | 8 576 | |
2 323 | 945 | 4 978 | |
Turkey | 21 146 | 13 782 | 20 442 | |
12 686 | 6 533 | 8 215 | |
GRAPEFRUIT | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | 28 074 | n.a. | 18 843 | |
46 135 | n.a. | 8 493 | |
of which : | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cuba | 16 937 | ... | 792 | |
39 060 | ... | 385 | |
Cyprus | 1 029 | ... | 2 526 | |
629 | ... | 1 518 | |
Israel | 4 088 | n.a. | 6 303 | |
2 497 | n.a. | 2 365 | |
Netherlands | 1 765 | ... | 1 157 | |
1 413 | ... | 551 | |
Turkey | 1 477 | ... | 4 247 | |
690 | ... | 1 601 |
Source: Russian Federation - Foreign Trade, Statistical Yearbook.
18. A 20 percent value-added tax (VAT) is charged on the cost price, i.e. in addition to customs duties. While import duties are relatively low, other customs regulations can pose difficulties. For example, there is a 30 tonne weight restriction for truck loads. If the weight is higher, a special permit is required. Since this procedure takes generally two weeks, the fruit is often spoiled.
Table 7 - Russian Federation: Import duties and taxes
VAT | Duty rate
(in percent of custom value) |
|
Citrus fruits, fresh or dried | ||
Oranges | 20 | 5 |
Mandarins, including tangerines | 20 | 5 |
and yunshiyu (satsum), clementines, | ||
wilkings and other analogous | ||
citrus fruit hybrids. | ||
Lemons and limes | 20 | 5 |
Grapefruits | 20 | 5 |
Orange juice | 20 | 10 |
Grapefruit juice | 20 | 10 |
Lemon juice | 20 | 10 |
Any other single citrus fruit juice | 20 | 10 |
19. There are two major points of import of citrus fruit into the Russia Federation. Fruit from Greece, Turkey, Cyprus and Israel come through Black Sea ports; those from Argentina, Uruguay and Cuba arrive via the Baltic Sea. There are also arrivals by truck, often from ports in the Netherlands and Germany.
20. The major transport problems in the northern ports, mainly Saint Petersburg, are ice and strong frost in the winter. Regarding arrivals through Black Sea ports, available vessels are not particularly suited to rough seas, which is generally the case in the winter when citrus is being marketed.
21. Arrivals at smaller ports are limited because often the fruit does not find sufficient demand. Furthermore, financial losses occur through the leasing of vessels, and long and expensive rail transport, with excessive waste.
22. Internal transport accounts for a large share of the cost structure of imported citrus. The distances and costs per tonne of fruit for distributing citrus to the more distant areas of the Russian Federation are shown in Table 8.
Table 8 - Russian Federation: Distance from St Petersburg and Novorossiysk
and cost of transport
ST PETERSBURG | NOVOROSSIYSK | |||||||||
(Baltic Sea) | (Black Sea) | |||||||||
Distance | Railway Cost | Distance | Railway Cost | |||||||
Km | US$/ton | Km | US$/ton | |||||||
Moscow | 705 | 75 | 1 628 | 116 | ||||||
Ekaterinenbourg | 2 098 | 130 | 2 803 | 153 | ||||||
Omsk | 3 001 | 160 | 3 486 | 176 | ||||||
Novosibirsk | 3 632 | 181 | 4 117 | 199 | ||||||
Barnaul | 3 809 | 188 | 4 294 | 204 | ||||||
Krasnojarsk | 4 407 | 210 | 4 892 | 226 | ||||||
Irkutsk | 5 467 | 246 | 5 952 | 264 | ||||||
Chita | 6 484 | 278 | 6 969 | 292 |
23. There are two major market centres for fruit in the Russian Federation: (1) Saint Petersburg and the surrounding areas with the natural privilege of having a large port, even if harbour facilities still need improvement, in particular a fruit terminal; (2) Moscow where income levels and purchasing power are higher than in the rest of the country.
24. To address joint concerns, the eleven largest Russian importing companies decided to establish the Russian Fruit Association (RFA). These companies, all located in St. Petersburg and Moscow, work closely in areas of common concern, but still operate as independent businesses. The major activities of the Association with respect to citrus trade are: to provide information for members through frequent reports on international movements, prices, government policy on trade, etc.; assistance to and co-operation between members during difficult market situations; protection of the rights of companies; common advertising; promotion of investment programmes for development of infrastructure, such as storage facilities or cooling chambers; and establishment and expansion of international co-operation. Eleven additional fruit trading companies from France, Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Italy and Israel have joined RFA as associate members.
25. The Turkish citrus trade has founded a marketing company known as ASM (Mediterranean Fruit and Vegetable Exporting Foreign Trade Corporation) made up of ten Turkish enterprises, to market fresh fruit and vegetables to the Russian Federation and the Ukraine. An important part of the effort will be in citrus, but other fruits and vegetables will be handled, as well as citrus from the Southern Hemisphere. ASM plans to ship cargoes directly to Novorossiysk and St. Petersburg and establish its own cold storage facilities. ASM will also work with a major trading company in Moscow and St. Petersburg. This new venture will try to improve distribution also to interior points.
26. The Czech Republic has had a growth of 1.2 percent annually in citrus imports between 1993 and 1996. Spain accounts for 56 percent of the market, with Italy, Greece and Turkey also being important suppliers. The current obligation for importers to deposit 20 percent of the value of imports for 180 days without interest, while not directed at citrus imports, is likely to weaken the capital structure of citrus importers.
27. As the GDP per caput in Slovakia is lower than in the Czech Republic there is a tendency to shop for citrus based on price as compared to quality considerations. Nevertheless, imports have enjoyed a growth rate of 4 percent per year between 1993 and 1996. Spain supplies about 55 percent of the market, while Italy, Greece , Cyprus and Turkey account for the majority of the remaining supplies.
28. Since 1993 Hungarys citrus imports have been declining at an average annual rate trend of 14 percent from a high of 101 000 tonnes in 1993 to 63 000 tonnes in 1996. High VAT rates on citrus, combined with customs duties and competition from other fruits, such as bananas and locally produced fruits create keen competition for citrus sales. Spain supplies about 37 percent of the market, but Turkey, Italy and Greece are also important suppliers. There is a considerable concentration in the market, with 60 percent of sales in the Budapest area. Hungarian consumers are very knowledgeable of citrus and other fruits as the country is itself a major fruit producer. As a result the consumer is demanding regarding quality. Customs duties are five percent, but the VAT is 25 percent.
Table 9 - Eastern Europe: Imports of citrus fruits
Growth Rate | ||||||||||
1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | |
1993-1996 | ||||
|
|
000 tonnes | |
|
% | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Eastern Europe | 528.8 | 671.5 | 724.7 | 746.3 | 665.2 | |
-0.3 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Albania | - | 13.2 | 22.0 | 20.8 | 13.1 | |
-0.3 | |||
Bulgaria | 30.2 | 56.0 | 101.1 | 88.0 | 39.2 | |
-11.2 | |||
Czechoslovakia | 116.7 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Czech Rep. | |
126.7 | 141.5 | 153.4 | 131.5 | |
1.2 | |||
Slovakia | |
53.5 | 61.1 | 57.7 | 60.2 | |
4.0 | |||
Hungary | 68.0 | 101.2 | 80.3 | 71.5 | 63.5 | |
-14.4 | |||
Poland | 261.7 | 252.3 | 252.7 | 278.6 | 294.1 | |
5.2 | |||
Romania | 82.4 | 68.6 | 66.0 | 76.3 | 63.6 | |
-2.5 | |||
29. Leaving aside the Russian Federation, dealt with above, apart from Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan, and Georgia, every nation comprising the area of the former USSR has experienced a growth in citrus imports since 1992. Imports of citrus fruit into these countries during 1992-96 are shown in Table 10. In most cases, growth has been pronounced. The Ukraine, with a population of over 51 million, should provide interesting market opportunities for citrus as incomes increase.
Table 10 - Area Former USSR: Imports of citrus fruits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Growth Rate | |
|
|
|
1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | |
1992-1996 | |
|
|
|
000 tonnes | % | |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Armenia | - | - | - | 3 357 | 5 971 | |
- | |
|
|
Azerbaijan | - | 9 663 | 21 125 | 13 494 | 7 771 | |
- | |
|
|
Belarus | 5 500 | 5 600 | 9 600 | 45 700 | 49 600 | |
73.3 | |
|
|
Estonia | 413 | 3 819 | 5 251 | 5 877 | 6 054 | |
95.7 | |
|
|
Georgia | - | 2 400 | 440 | 1 450 | 1 450 | |
- | |
|
|
Kazakstan | 1 000 | 1 690 | 7 920 | 6 067 | 6 141 | |
57.4 | |
|
|
Kyrgyzstan | - | 70 | 300 | 828 | 1 555 | |
- | |
|
|
Latvia | 542 | 5 134 | 6 443 | 7 857 | 9 565 | |
105.0 | |
|
|
Lithuania | 150 | 6 000 | 16 359 | 14 470 | 15 511 | |
218.9 | |
|
|
Moldova Rep | 1 150 | 1 600 | 1 992 | 3 967 | 3 319 | |
30.3 | |
|
|
Turkmenistan | - | 550 | 135 | 19 381 | 2 253 | |
- | |
|
|
Ukraine | 48 500 | 44 820 | 64 700 | 45 500 | 56 200 | |
3.8 | |
|
|
Uzbekistan | 500 | 520 | 221 | 201 | 201 | |
-20.4 | |
|
|
Total | 57 755 | 81 866 | 134 486 | 168 149 | 165 591 | |
30.1 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Russian Fed | 118 880 | 286 879 | 629 137 | 466 731 | 443 841 | |
39.0 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Area Former USSR | 176 635 | 368 745 | 763 623 | 634 880 | 609 432 | |
36.3 | |
30. As can be seen in Table 11, 1996 imports by this group of nations are now 50 percent higher than the 1988-91 average. Per caput consumption is also higher. As with the Russian Federation, in the last few years consumption is shifting to tangerines away from oranges and grapefruit.
Table 11 - Former Area USSR: Citrus imports by variety and
per caput consumption, 1988-96
1988-91
(Average) |
1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | |
metric tonnes | ||||||
IMPORTS | ||||||
Total Citrus | 404 971 | 176 635 | 368 745 | 763 623 | 634 880 | 609 432 |
Oranges | 243 119 | 127 257 | 261 346 | 538 120 | 438 017 | 354 359 |
Tangerines | 6 446 | 2 000 | 25 290 | 86 634 | 80 302 | 125 556 |
Lemons | 54 156 | 17 578 | 67 990 | 102 973 | 96 474 | 107 583 |
Grapefruit | 101 250 | 29 744 | 12 878 | 30 947 | 20 006 | 21 391 |
Citrus n.e.s. | - | 56 | 1 241 | 4 949 | 81 | 543 |
kg/year | ||||||
PER CAPUT | ||||||
Total Citrus | 1.40 | 0.60 | 1.26 | 2.61 | 2.16 | 2.08 |
31. There are several factors relevant to the future outlook for citrus in Eastern Europe and the area of the former USSR. The rate of GDP growth will play a key role in per caput income levels, an important factor determining citrus consumption. Although prospects exist for further market growth, transport difficulties will continue to inhibit trade in fresh citrus, as do commodity taxes which curtail consumption in the light of the relatively weak purchasing power of consumers. The absence of administrative transparency in regulatory measures, particularly with regard to imports, is also likely to dampen the growth of the market. Generally speaking, per caput consumption is likely to remain low by western European standards for some time, although some encouragement is found in the growth in imports among the nations of the former USSR, as well as in Slovakia, the Czech Republic and Poland. Much of the positive side of the ledger comes from improved marketing organization and better fruit distribution infrastructure.
32. With respect to sources of imports, the trend towards purchases directly from producing countries is likely to continue, with Mediterranean countries being the major suppliers. Turkey, with a major production expansion and favourable prices, could further expand its market share in the Russian Federation. Israel could also strengthen its market position. Approximately 20 percent of Israeli citrus is now destined to Eastern Europe. There may be increased competition in the future from Argentina and Uruguay, with improved quality and reasonable prices, while Cuba may be expected to recover from the dramatic drop in sales to the Russian Federation.
33. The Group may wish to recommend that the Secretariat continue to monitor closely the citrus markets of the countries covered in this paper, as they constitute an area of important future potential consumption.