Fisheries Statistics and Information Systems (FISHIN)UGA/87/007
SEC Fld Rpt. 17

FAO/UNDP PROJECT UGA/87/007
FISHIN NOTES AND RECORDS

Cover
SOCIO-ECONOMIC FIELD REPORTS
No. 17
FISH AND FUEL, FOOD AND FORESTS: PERSPECTIVES ON POST-HARVEST LOSSES IN UGANDA1
TABLE OF CONENTS

By

W.M. Ssali,2 J.E. Reynolds,3 & A.R. Ward4

FISHIN - UGA/87/007Dec. 1990


1 This paper was originally presented at the Symposium on Post-Harvest Fish Technology, Committee for Inland Fisheries of Africa, Eighth Session, Cairo, Egypt, 21–25 October 1990. Views expressed are those of the authors; they do not necessarily reflect the views of the Uganda Department of Fisheries nor of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

2 Fisheries Officer i/c, Fish Technology Laboratory, Fisheries Dept., P.O. Box 168, Entebbe, Uganda (Equal Co-Author).

3 Socio-Economist, FAO/UN, P.O. Box 521, Kampala, Uganda (Equal Co-Author)

4 Fisheries Research Officer, 13 Ripon Way, Carlton Miniott, Thirsk, North Yorks, YO7 4LR, U.K. (Equal Co-Author).


ABSTRACT

In Uganda, the long-term socio-economic costs of wastage in the post-harvest sector of the fisheries involve more than the loss of income and nutritional benefits to fisherfolk communities and their dependent consumer populations. Such losses are serious enough in themselves. But established methods of fish processing also place great pressure on valuable and often increasingly scarce timber stocks. From a forestry and environmental management standpoint, this too amounts to a kind of “post-harvest loss”, and is indeed part of a wider complex of events associated with recent developments in the Uganda fisheries.

The present paper reviews these events of change, and draws attention to such underlying factors as “the Nile perch effect” in Lake Victoria, shifting channels of product distribution and marketing, and the consequences of a prolonged period of deterioration in the country's infrastructural network. Discussion goes on to cover experiences with attempts to ameliorate fish and forest product losses through the use of improved traditional processing technology on the one hand, and more industrial, capital-intensive handling and distribution methods on the other. Finally, future prospects for meeting the array of socio-economic and environmental problems and challenges posed by the “post-harvest loss complex” are identified.




EDITORIAL NOTE

This is one in a series of Field Reports by the Socio-Economic Working Group of FAO/UNDP Project UGA/87/007, Fisheries Statistics and Information Systems (FISHIN). Socio-Economic Field Reports (SEC Fld Rpts) are intended as occasional working documents/ briefs/notes covering on-going Group activities, issued for the information of Project team members and other interested colleagues. Length, format, and content vary according to the type and scope of activity reviewed (field trips, surveys, studies, workshops, etc.). It is cautioned that observations and findings presented in the Reports should be treated as preliminary and subject to further verification. Correspondence, comments, and suggestions are welcomed and may be forwarded to: J.Eric Reynolds, Socio-Economic Advisor, UGA/87/007, FAO/UN, P.O. Box 521, Kampala, Uganda.



Hyperlinks to non-FAO Internet sites do not imply any official endorsement of or responsibility for the opinions, ideas, data or products presented at these locations, or guarantee the validity of the information provided. The sole purpose of links to non-FAO sites is to indicate further information available on related topics.

This electronic document has been scanned using optical character recognition (OCR) software. FAO declines all responsibility for any discrepancies that may exist between the present document and its original printed version.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

FISH AND FUEL, FOOD AND FORESTS: PERSPECTIVES ON POST-HARVEST LOSSES IN UGANDA

1.   INTRODUCTION

1.1   Uganda Fisheries: A Profile

1.2   Food and Forests: The Post-Harvest Loss Complex

2.   RECENT TRENDS IN THE FISHERIES

2.1   Evolution of Catch Levels

2.2   Changes in the Post-Harvest Sector

3.   TOWARDS IMPROVEMENTS IN POST-HARVEST SECTOR PERFORMANCE

3.1   New Developments in Industrial Handling and Processing

3.1.1   Private and Parastatal Firms

3.1.2   UFEL: Fresh Chilled Fish for Local Markets

3.2   Innovations for Artisanal Processing

3.2.1   The CICS Project

3.2.2   Waterborne Fish Transport: The SICS Project

3.2.3   The Kichwamba Fish Processing Research Project

4.   CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

4.1.   The Outlook

4.2   Recommendations

5.   REFERENCES CITED

ANNEX: FIGURES AND TABLES