Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


Interactions of longtail tuna fisheries in the western South China Sea

T. Yonemori, H. Yanagawa and Lui Yean Pong
Marine Fishery Resources
Southeast Asian Fishery Development Center
Chendering Fisheries Complex
21080 Kuala Ternegganau, Malaysia

ABSTRACT

Longtail tuna (Thunnus tonggol) inhabit the coastal waters from the western Pacific Ocean to the northwestern Indian Ocean. The species mainly occurs in waters of northern Australia, East and South China Sea and North Indian Ocean (including the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden). In the South China Sea area, longtail tuna are found in abundance in the Gulf of Thailand and along the east coast of Peninsula Malaysia. Longtail tuna are caught by Thai purse seine and drift gillnet fisheries and by Malaysian purse seine, drift gillnet and hook-and-line fisheries. The total catch of longtail tuna from this general area has increased rapidly from 14,300 mt landed in 1980 to more than 100,000 mt in recent years; the increase has been the result of a dramatic increase in Thai purse seine landings. Presently about 90% of the longtail tuna catch is from the purse seine fisheries.

Intensive exploitation of longtail tuna by the purse seine fishery in the western part of the South China Sea (especially in the Gulf of Thailand) indicates a possible interaction between the purse seine fishery and other fisheries. This view is suggested by recent decreasing trends in CPUE in all of the other fisheries targeting longtail tuna in the area.

1. DISTRIBUTION AND CATCH OF LONGTAIL TUNA

Longtail tuna (Thunnus tonggol) is one of the typical neritic tuna species which inhabit the coastal waters from the western Pacific Ocean to the northwestern Indian Ocean including the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden (Fischer and Bianchi, 1994). Estimated catches of longtail tuna by FAO statistical areas are shown in Table 1. The annual total catch exceeded 150,000 mt in recent years. The central west Pacific Ocean (Area 71) which includes the South China Sea (Figure 1) recorded the bulk of the longtail tuna catch; the landings from this area exceeded 60% of the total catch.

The catches of longtail tuna in the South China Sea by country are shown in Table 2. The recorded catches include only those for Taiwan, Thailand and Malaysia fisheries. Considering the general continuity of distribution of a migratory species such as longtail tuna, it is suspected that the longtail tuna may not be reported properly in the catch statistics of some countries.

The western part of the South China Sea (Gulf of Thailand and coastal areas off East Peninsular Malaysia) has been known for its abundance of longtail tuna and this species is one of the most important commercial species in this area. Although tagging experiments involving small tunas (kawakawa, Euthynnus affinis, and longtail tuna) have been carried out in waters of the east coast of Peninsular Malaysia since 1990, the recaptures of longtail tuna have not been sufficiently large enough to estimate movements and migration patterns (Raja Bidin, 1990). However, based on the relative differences in catch per unit effort (CPUE) of Thai fisheries and Malaysian fisheries in the area, the main concentration of longtail tuna appears to be in the Gulf of Thailand.

Table 1. Catch of longtail tuna, by FAO Fishery Statistical Area, 1982-91.

Unit: 1,000 M/T


1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

NW Indian Ocean (FAO 51)*
(Iran, Oman, Pakistan)**

13.9

12.6

13.5

36.8

31.3

37.3

40.1

35.6

33

29.4

NE Indian Ocean (FAO 57)*
(Thailand, Australia, India)**

7.1

6.7

6

2.5

2

1.5

1.4

1.5

1.1

1.1

CW Pacific Ocean (FAO 71)*
(Thailand, Malaysia)**

16.5

50.5

39.2

46.4

47.1

38.2

92.5

82.3

104.9

115.3

NW Pacific Ocean (FAO 61)*
(Taiwan)**

6.5

6.1

5.6

5.8

5.5

6.3

6.9

13.2

26.8

17.4

Total

44

75.8

64.4

91.5

85.9

83.2

140.9

132.7

165.8

163.2

*FAO Fishery Statistical Area
**Major Fishing Countries

Figure 1. South China Sea.

2. FISHERIES FOR LONGTAIL TUNA IN THE WESTERN SOUTH CHINA SEA

2.1 Thai Fisheries

The Thai fisheries operating in the Gulf of Thailand and connecting off-shore areas include the purse seine and drift gillnet fisheries. The longtail tuna caught by these fisheries comprise more than 99% of the total longtail tuna caught by Thai fisheries in this area.

Table 2. Catch of longtail tuna, by country, 1976-92.

Unit: Metric tons


1976

1977

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

Taiwan

74

420

253

208

179

259

366

323


Philippines










Hong Kong










Kampuchea










Vietnam










Thailand




(12,503)

(8,671)

(11,564)

(23,416)

(53,805)

(44,374)


Gulf of Thai




10,583

7,962

9,958

16,306

50,449

38,556


Indian Ocean




1,920

709

1,606

7,110

3,356

5,822

Malaysia


(12,446)

(12,147)

(8,902)

(11,087)

(17,725)

(14,603)

(18,838)

(17,723)


West Peninsula


2,344

3,191

2,024

4,701

2,632

1,713

2,680

3,075


East Peninsula


10,102

8,956

6,878

6,386

15,093

12,890

16,158

14,648


Sabah











Sarawak










Singapore










Brunei










Indonesia










Total

74

12,866

12,400

21,613

19,937

29,548

38,385

72,966

62,101



1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

Taiwan




7,290

5,876

5,754

3,624


Philippines









Hong Kong









Kampuchea









Vietnam









Thailand

(48,000)

(48,299)

(65,911)

(92,925)

(82,125)

(102,436)

(84,847)



Gulf of Thai

45,589

46,404

63,877

91,628

80,596

101,397

79,227



Indian Ocean

2,411

1,895

2,034

1,297

1,529

1,039

5,620


Malaysia

(19,151)

(16,590)

(25,484)

(26,641)

(17,123)

(17,812)

(28,058)

(35,003)


West Peninsula

4,551

4,036

6,719

5,035

3,666

4,626

5,051

8,194


East Peninsula

14,600

12,554

18,765

15,695

9,959

10,014

9,890

8,002


Sabah




5,101

1,986

721

11,124

16,698


Sarawak




810

1,512

2,451

1,993

2,109

Singapore









Brunei









Indonesia









Total

67,151

64,889

91,395

126,856

105,124

126,002

116,529

35,003

Fishery Statistical Bulletin for South China Sea Area (Edited by SEAFDEC)
2.1.1 Thai purse seine fisheries

Until 1993, catch statistics of the Government of Thailand sub-categorized the purse seine fisheries into Thai purse seine, anchovy purse seine and luring purse seine fisheries. After 1994 the fisheries were categorized into only two types; the purse-seine and anchovy purse-seine fisheries.

The Thai purse seine operates in the daytime; fish schools are located visually and/or with the aid of sonar before the net is encircled around the school. The luring purse-seine uses electric lamps to attract fish schools at night or use fish shelters (payaos) which do the attracting of the schools (Okawara et al., 1986). The fisheries using these two types of purse seines usually target longtail tuna. The anchovy purse seine is made up of small-mesh netting and operates mostly in nearshore waters (Okawara et al., 1986). The catch of longtail tuna by the anchovy purse-seine is negligible.

Table 3 shows the number of purse seine vessels (Thai purse seine and luring purse seine vessels combined) by size of boat. About 650 purse seine boats are in operation annually; vessels make repeated fishing trips of 3-4 days duration. The most common size vessel is 20-100 tons and the average vessel is generally equipped with modern fishing gear. As shown in Table 4, the purse seine fishery catches a wide range of species. Although sardines, scads and Indo-Pacific mackerel were principal species landed in earlier years, the longtail tuna has become the first or second highest ranking species landed by the purse seine fishery in recent years.

2.1.2 Thai drift gillnet fisheries

The two types of drift gillnets are the Spanish mackerel gillnet (mesh size of 6-10 cm) and the mackerel encircling gillnet (mesh size of 4-4.5 cm). Both types of drift gillnets catch longtail tuna in this area; however, the longtail tuna catch by the mackerel encircling gillnet is a very minor component of the total catch (Okawara et al., 1986).

Table 3 shows the number of Spanish mackerel gillnet vessels by size; the majority of the vessels range in size from 10-50 tons. Approximately 250 of these gillnet vessels operate in the area with vessels making repeated fishing trips of 2-5 days duration. The catch by species of Spanish mackerel gillnet vessels is shown in Table 4; the longtail tuna accounts for about 30% of the catch.

2.2 Malaysian Fisheries

The three types of fishing gears operated by the Malaysian fisheries in waters off the east coast of Peninsular Malaysia include the purse seine, drift gillnet and hook-and-line. The longtail tuna caught by these three types of gear comprise more than 99% of the total longtail tuna catch in this area.

2.2.1 Malaysia purse seine fisheries

The purse seine fisheries of Malaysia can be classified into several groups according to methods of fishing and species targeted (Munprasit et al., 1989). The Statistical Bulletin issued by the Government of Malaysia, however, lists only the purse-seine and anchovy purse-seine fisheries. The catch of longtail tuna by the anchovy purse seine is very small.

Table 3. Number of fishing units targeting longtail tuna, by country, gear type and size of vessel.

Thai Fisheries
(Gulf of Thailand)

 

Gear type



Size

1980

1985

1990

< 10 (tons)

77

28

47

10-20

131

69

45

Purse

20-50

288

348

203

Seine





50-100

111

206

287

100 <

2

16

75

Sub-total

609

667

657

<10 (tons)

94

29

29

10-20

107

82

51

Drift

20-50

66

124

119

Gillnet





50-100

5

20

34

100 <



6

Sub-total

272

256

239

< 10 (tons)


1

2

10-20


53

30

Purse

20-50


72

73

Seine



50-100


109

140

100 <


6

3

Sub-total

320

241

248

Malaysia


<10 (tons)




Fisheries


10-20




(East Coast
of Peninsula
Malaysia)

 

Drift

20-50

Majority: 5-10 tons

Gillnet

 

50-100




100 <




Sub-total

1,487

879

1,053

< 10 (tons)




10-20




Hook &

20-50

Majority: 5-15 tons

Line

50-100




100 <




Sub-total

1,791

877

(1,300;

Fishery Statistical Bulletin for South China Sea Area (Edited by SEAFDEC)
There are about 240-320 one-boat purse seiners (including anchovy purse-seine vessels) operating in the area annually. The majority of these vessels are from 20 to 100 tons size (Table 3); fishing trips extend over 1 to 2 days.

The purse seiners usually operate at night using luring lights to attract fish; the principal species caught include scads, sardines and Indian mackerels. Longtail tuna are caught incidentally; thus, the longtail tuna catch from the Malaysia purse seine fishery makes up a substantially smaller fraction of the catch than the Thai purse seine fishery.

Table 4. Catch of major species by purse seine, drift gillnet and hook and line fisheries in the Western China Sea.

Unit: Metric tons




1980

1985

1990

Purse Seine




Gulf of Thailand



 

Total

231,381

418,106

471,298

Longtall Tuna

3,906

37,973

95,914

(2%)

(9%)

(20%)

Scads

53,719

47,202

40,651

Jack, Trevallies

11,928

41,734

29,319

Sardines

75,575

64,535

83,555

Anchovies

1,914

14,827

432

Eastern Longtall Tuna

2,319

22,785

49,468

Indian Mackerel

17,104

29,775

15,718

Indo-Pacific Mackerel

16,925

47,341

42,487

Others

47,991

111,934

113,754

East Coast Peninsula Malaysia



 

Total

50,487

59,381

78,183

Longtail Tuna

890

2,961

3.671

(2%)

(5%)

(5%)

Scads

13,955

28,005

5,046

Jack, Trevallies

393

131

264

Sardines

6,572

4,678

8,383

Anchovies

1,893


3,855

Eastern Longtail Tuna




Indian Mackerel

19,331

20,819

8,488

Indo-Pacific Mackerel




Others

7,453

2,787

48,476

Drift Gillnet




 

Gulf of Thailand



Total

11,505

25,172

15,595

Longtail Tuna

3,108

7,327

4,919

(27%)

(29%)

(32%)

Jack, Trevallies

16

1

3

Scads

245

60

54

Black Pomfret

95

556

335

Eastern Longtail Tuna

2,614

11,367

5,356

Indian Mackerel


25

25

Indo-Pacific Mackerel


19

17

N-B King Mackerel

4,486

4,158

3,796

Others

931

1,650

1,090

East coast Peninsula Malaysia



Total

14,059

9,905

9,683

Longtail Tuna

2,465

5,076

1,708

(18%)

(51%)

(18%)

Jack, Trevallies

61

45

408

Scads

1,078

252

904

Black Pomfret

355

58

69

Eastern Longtail Tuna




Indian Mackerel

2,254

497

597

Indo-Pacific Mackerel




N-B King Mackerel


1,613


Others

7,846

2,364

5,997

Hook &Line



East coast * Peninsula Malaysia


Total

14,440

15,616

14,305

Longtail Tuan

2,833

6,242

4,558

(20%)

(40%)

(32%)

Jack, Trevallies

223

425

363

Scads

2,430

3,594

2,261

Billfishes

579

146

85

Indian Mackerel

480

772

138

N-B King Mackerel

2,633

1,776

1,515

Sharks

193

291

128

Rays

173

129

155

Others

4,896

2,241

5,102

Fishery Statistical Bulletin for South China Sea Area (Edited by SEAFDEC)
2.2.2 Malaysia drift gillnet fisheries

While there are several types of drift gillnets used in Malaysia, the Spanish mackerel gillnet (mesh size of 6.5 cm) is the most common gillnet used to catch longtail tuna; this is a similar situation as in Thailand.

Table 3 shows the number of vessels that use the Spanish mackerel gillnets; about 1,000 of these vessels operate in the area annually. The common size of vessel in this fishery is 5 to 10 tons. Fishing is carried out during the day and fishing trips are usually of one day duration. The catch by this fishery is shown in Table 4; longtail tuna make up a substantial part (18-51%) of the total catch.

2.2.3 Malaysia hook-and-line fisheries

The hook-and-line fisheries include handline, bottom longline and trolling. Longtail tuna are caught exclusively by troll lines and surface handlines. Data of the number of vessels fishing for longtail tuna are not available; however, the Malaysian Statistics lists more than 1,000 unclassified hook-and-line vessels. Most of these boats are 5-15 tons in size; fishing trips are from 5-6 days duration. The catch by these boats are shown in Table 4. The catch of longtail tuna comprises a substantial part (20-40%) of the total catch.

3. SIZE SELECTIVITY FOR LONGTAIL TUNA BY FISHERY

The size of longtail tuna caught differs according to the fishing gear used. Figure 2 shows the wide range of longtail tuna taken by the purse-seine fishery; fish range in size from 18 cm to over 50 cm. While the handline fishery also catches longtail tuna ranging in size from 15 cm to 50 cm, the majority of fish is from 25 cm to 40 cm. Since drift gillnets use a restricted net-mesh size, the range in size of longtail tuna caught by the drift-gillnet fishery is narrow; for 1989 the range was from 28 cm to 39 cm.

4. CATCH TRENDS OF LONGTAIL TUNA BY FISHERY

The total catch of longtail tuna from the area increased rapidly from about 10,000 mt in the late 1970s to more than 100,000 mt in recent years; a historical high in catch of 111,000 mt was landed in 1990 (Table 5 and Figure 3). In recent years the purse seine catch has accounted for nearly 90% of the total longtail tuna catch; the drift gillnet catch for 5-8% and the hook-and-line catch for 4-6%.

4.1 Purse Seine Fisheries

The combined catch of longtail tuna by the Thai and Malaysian purse-seine fisheries increased abruptly from several thousand tons landed annually prior to 1983 to 45,496 mt landed in 1983 (Table 5). Since 1983 the longtail tuna catch has shown a remarkable increasing trend, reaching a peak of more than 99,000 mt landed in 1990 (Table 5 and Figure 3). The dramatic increase has been primarily due to the increase in Thai catch; the Malaysian catch has remained at a relatively low level of less than 10,000 tons landed annually.

Figure 2. Length frequency distribution of longtail tuna caught by the Malaysian fishery, by gear type, in 1989 (sampling site: Kuala Terrenganu, Malaysia). (A)

Figure 2. Length frequency distribution of longtail tuna caught by the Malaysian fishery, by gear type, in 1989 (sampling site: Kuala Terrenganu, Malaysia). (B)

Figure 2. Length frequency distribution of longtail tuna caught by the Malaysian fishery, by gear type, in 1989 (sampling site: Kuala Terrenganu, Malaysia). (C)

Figure 3. Catches of longtail tuna in the western part of the South China Sea, by gear type, 1979-91.

Table 5. Catch of longtail tuna in the western South China Sea, by gear type, 1979-92.



1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

Purse Seine

Gulf of Thailand

5,811

3,906

4,102

4,841

44,017

30,628

38,022

East P. Malaysia

1,936

890

1,330

490

1,479

2,045

3,275

Sub-Total

7,747

4,796

5,432

5,331

45,496

32,673

41,297

Drift Gillnet

Gulf of Thailand

4,679

3,734

5,689

11,441

6,372

7,815

7,540

East P. Malaysia

1,652

2,465

5,413

4,054

5,850

6,130

5,077

Sub-Total

6,331

6,199

11,102

15,495

12,222

13,945

12,617

Hook & Line

East P. Malaysia

3,098

3,833

8,320

8,346

8,818

6,472

6,242

Other Gears

 

Gulf of Thailand

93

322

167

24

60

113

27

East P. Malaysia

162

197

30


11

1

6

Sub-Total

255

519

197

24

71

114

33

Grand-total

17,431

14,347

25,051

29,196

66,607

53,204

60,189




1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

Purse Seine

 

Gulf of Thailand

39,131

57,721

82,929

75,199

95,914

75,802


East P. Malaysia

1,327

2,721

8,529

2,737

3,670

4,080

3,299

Sub-Total

40,458

60,442

91,458

77,936

99,584

79,882


Drift Gillnet

 

Gulf of Thailand

7,232

6,149

8,670

5,372

5,119

3,304


East P. Malaysia

2,842

4,303

872

1,848

1,708

1,297

1,091

Sub-Total

10,074

10,452

9,542

7,220

6,827

4,601


Hook & Line

East P. Malaysia

8,348

11,699

6,258

5,351

4,558

4,456

3,574

Other Gears

 

Gulf of Thailand

41

7

29

25

364

121


East P. Malaysia

37

42

36

23

78

57

37

Sub-Total

78

49

65

48

442

178


Grand-total

58,958

82,642

107,323

90,555

111,411

89,117



The marked increase in the Thai purse seine catch has been attributed to increase in catch efficiency; the efficiency gained from the use of fish shelters (payaos), luring light and advanced electronic equipment, e.g., radar, sonar, echo-sounder and satellite navigation (Pramokchutima, 1992). The principal species caught by the Thai purse seiners has shifted gradually from round scads and sardine to Indo-Pacific mackerel, longtail tuna and kawakawa (Yanagawa, 1989; 1992). The shift in target species has been attributed to the increased demand by tuna canneries, especially for white meat tuna such as the longtail tuna. The tuna canneries developed in Thailand in the mid-1980s (Table 6) probably accelerated the targeting of longtail tuna by the Thai purse seiners.

4.2 Drift Gillnet Fisheries

The combined longtail tuna catch by the Thai and Malaysian drift-gillnet fisheries increased to more than 10,000 mt in the early 1980s; the peak catch of 15,500 mt occurred in 1982 (Table 5, Figure 3). Since 1982 the longtail tuna catch by drift gillnets has declined. It was noted that much of the decline in recent years has been due to the general acceptance of the United Nations Resolution of 1992, which called for a ban on large-scale drift gillnet fishing.

Although small-scale drift gillnet fisheries still operate in the western part of the South China Sea, some parts of Malaysia’s EEZ waters in the area have become off-limits for fishing with gillnets; the restrictions were a means to protect marine turtles. The banning regulation went into effect in 1990. While banning of drift gillnets may have contributed to the low catches of longtail tuna by drift gillnets, other factors may be involved. It was noted that the declining trend in longtail tuna catches started earlier than the banning effort; the decline has been noted in the Thai drift gillnet fishery as well as the Malaysian drift gillnet fishery.

4.3 Hook-and-Line Fishery

The longtail tuna catch by the Malaysian hook-and-line fishery increased moderately up to 1987 when a catch of 11,700 mt was reported. However, since 1987 the longtail tuna catch has shown a decreasing trend (Table 5, Figure 3).

5. LONGTAIL TUNA CPUE BY FISHERY

The CPUE of longtail tuna by fishery are shown in Table 7 and Figure 4. The following sections describe the trends in CPUE by fishery.

5.1 Purse Seine Fisheries

The CPUE of longtail tuna by the Thai purse-seine fishery increased sharply in 1983 and continued to show a general increase until 1991 (Figure 4). The increase has been attributed to a shift in target species from scads and anchovy to longtail tuna and to improved fishing technology. The change in target species is shown by the sharp increase in longtail tuna as a percent of the total catch (Figure 5). Evidence that improved fishing technology is responsible for the increase in CPUE of longtail tuna is that the CPUE of other species also increased.

Table 6. Number of canning plants and quantity of tuna products, 1980-90.

Year

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

No of canning plants

-

14

24

26

38

39

41

41

45

43

42

Quantity (mt) of Little tuna

-

-

-

36,823

60,420

65,577

83,346

92,357

82,176

111,363

114,767

Tuna

-

-

-


85,700

106,325

191,418

195,246

274,911

331,953


Total

-

-

-

36,823

146,120

171,902

274,764

287,603

357,087

443,316


Somsak Pramokchutima (1992): Tuna Fishery Status: Thailand
Since the Malaysian purse seine fishery catches longtail tuna only incidentally, the longtail tuna CPUE for this fishery has been extremely low compared to the Thai fishery (Figure 4). Further, since 1988 the CPUE for the Malaysia fishery has shown a marked decline suggesting a possible decline in availability in the area fished by the Malaysian fleet. Whether this reflects the result of interaction needs to be explored.

5.2 Drift Gillnet Fisheries

Similar to the purse seine fisheries, the Thai and Malaysian drift-gillnet fisheries show a marked difference in CPUE (Table 7 and Figure 4). The reason for the difference may be due to differences in operational pattern or to factors such as differences in density of fish in the two fishing areas or differences in mesh-size used by the two fisheries. However, it is notable that a steady decline in the CPUE is observed for both fisheries in the late 1980s.

5.3 Malaysian Hook-and-Line Fishery

The CPUE of the Malaysian hook-and-line fishery increased moderately up to 1987; thereafter, the CPUE showed a steady decline (Table 7 and Figure 4).

6. POSSIBLE INTERACTION BETWEEN FISHERIES

Although some of the differences in CPUE between the Thai and Malaysian fisheries (purse seine and drift gillnet fisheries) may be due to differences in species targeted and in differences in fishing method and pattern, the large differences in CPUE levels cannot be explained very well without referring to other possible factors, e.g., differences in density or being the effects of interaction between the fisheries. If longtail tuna are concentrated in the Gulf of Thailand, an intensive effort by a highly mechanized fishery such as the purse seine fishery may have an effect upon the catch of other fisheries, especially if the resource is being exploited at a level that cannot be sustained. The exploitation rate of longtail tuna in Malaysian waters was estimated at 0.63, whereas the optimum exploitation rate was reported to be 0.49 (Raja Bidin and Rumpet, 1992). Considering the present high catch level of longtail tuna by the Thai purse seine fishery, over-exploitation of longtail tuna may have occurred in Thai waters, as well. The decreasing trends in CPUE of all of the other fisheries in the area in recent years indicate a possible effect of interaction between the purse seine fishery and the other fisheries.

7. DISCUSSION

Changes in the catch of longtail tuna in the western part of the South China Sea suggest that the Thai purse seine fishery may be affecting the other fisheries for longtail tuna in the area. To date, this view is only suggestive based on some catch and CPUE trends. Additional information is needed including evidence of longtail tuna movements in the area and basic population dynamics parameters, e.g., mortality and growth rates.

Presently SEAFDEC plans to aid in the improvement of collection systems for necessary fishery statistics. Plans are also being developed to undertake joint tagging programmes with countries fishing in the area. Finally, a modelling study of interaction among longtail tuna fisheries in the area is being considered for implementation.

Table 7. CPUE of longtail tuna in the western South China Sea, by gear type, 1979-91.


1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

Purse Seine

 

Gulf of Thailand

 

Catch (ton)

5,811

3,906

4,102

4,811

43,916

30,455

37,973

Fishing day

116,429

117,385

126,567

121,828

118,691

147,566

124,159

Catch/Day

0.050

0.033

0.032

0.040

0.370

0.206

0.306

East Coast

Catch (ton)


3,906

1,331

478

1,479

2,045

3,275

Peninsula

Fishing day


117,385

58,590

47,341

44,318

48,878

47,458

Malaysia

Catch/Day


0.033

0.023

0.01

0.033

0.042

0.069

Drift Gillnet

 

Gulf of Thailand

Catch (ton)

2,336

3,108

5,640

10,174

5,711

6.961

7,327

Fishing day

39,926

35,515

44,478

40,302

47,253

47,457

44,862

Catch/Day

0.059

0.088

0.127

0.252

0.121

0.147

0.163

East Coast

Catch (ton)


2,645

5,413

4,054

5,850

6,130

5,077

Peninsula

Fishing day


269,147

360,476

292,284

216,693

195,392

151,188

Malaysia

Catch/Day


0.010

0.015

0.014

0.027

0.031

0.034

Hook & Line

 

East Coast

Catch (ton)


2,833

8,320

8,346

8,818

6,472

6,242

Peninsula

Fishing day


385,065

412,828

304,560

223,745

193,620

187,897

Malaysia

Catch/Day


0.007

0.02

0.027

0.039

0.033

0.033



1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

Purse Seine

 

Gulf of Thailand

Catch (ton)

39,131

57,721

82,929

75,188

95,914

75,764

Fishing day

166,639

195,972

189,957

167,285

232,212

152,949

Catch/Day

0.235

0.295

0.437

0.449

0.413

0.495

East Coast

Catch (ton)

1,327

2,721

8,529

2,737

3,671

4,021

Peninsula

Fishing day

37,736

43,245

42,051

45,586

58,034

565,632

Malaysia

Catch/Day

0.035

0.063

0.203

0.06

0.063

0.007

Drift Gillnet

 

Gulf of Thailand

 

Catch (ton)

7,172

6,112

8,426

4,784

4,919

3,304

Fishing day

56,609

57,485

76,915

46,571

60,377

36,078

Catch/Day

0.127

0.106

0.11

0.103

0.081

0.092

East Coast

Catch (ton)

2,842

4,303

872

1,848

1,708

1,297

Peninsula

Fishing day

180,690

195,972

181,295

199,454

200,968

171,955

Malaysia

Catch/Day

0.016

0.022

0.005

0.009

0.008

0.008

Hook & Line

East Coast

Catch (ton)

8,348

11,699

6,258

5,351

4,558

4,456

Peninsula

Fishing day

135,180

169,187

183,160

260,210

308,455

240,622

Malaysia

Catch/Day

0.062

0.069

0.034

0.021

0.015

0.019


Figure 4. Longtail tuna CPUE trends in the western South China Sea, by gear type, 1979-91.

Figure 5. Change in proportion of longtail tuna in the total Thai purse seine catch, 1979-91.

8. REFERENCES CITED

Fischer, W., and G. Bianchi (eds.). 1984. FAO species identification sheets for fishery purposes, western Indian Ocean, Vol IV (FAO Area 51). FAO Fisheries Department, Rome, Italy.

Munprasit, A., Y. Theparoonrat, Sijin See-Ung, S. Soodhom, Y. Matsunaga, B. Chokesanguan and S. Siriraksophon. 1989. Fishing gear and methods in southeast Asia: II Malaysia. (SEAFDEC, Training Department)

Okawara, M., A. Munprasit, Y. Theparoonrat, P. Masthawee and B. Chokesanguan. 1986. Fishing gear and methods in southeast Asia: I. Thailand. SEAFDEC, Training Department.

Pramokchutima, S. 1992. Tuna fishery status: Thailand. Paper presented at the Fifth Southeast Asia Tuna Conference, General Santos, Philippines, September 1992.

Raja Bidin B. Raja Hassan. 1990. Preliminary results of tuna tagging programme in Malaysia. Paper presented at the Fourth Southeast Asian Tuna Conference, Bangkok, Thailand, November 1990.

Raja Bidin B. Raja Hassan, and R. Rumpet. 1992. Some aspects on longtail and kawakawa in Malaysia. Paper presented at the Fifth Southeast Asian Tuna Conference, General Santos, Philippines, September 1992.

Yanagawa, H. 1989. A preliminary report on the influence of the increase in tuna fisheries upon the other marine fisheries in the Gulf of Thailand. Paper presented at the Third Southeast Asian Tuna Conference, Bali, Indonesia, August 1989.

Yanagawa, H. 1992. The situation of small tuna fishing in the Gulf of Thailand from 1978 to 1988 based on multivariate analysis. SEAFDEC TD/RES/31.


Previous Page Top of Page Next Page