Previous PageTable Of ContentsNext Page


Based on the above presentations and ensuing discussions, the meeting identified the lack of management of rattan as the key problem. In addition, it was underlined by the participants that rattan is the flagship of NWFP, and the success or failure of the management and development of rattan would have a far-reaching impact on the management and development of other NWFP. The present state of failure in the management of rattan had resulted in the following: depleting resource, diminishing supply, increased threat to the rattan industry, disappearing genetic resource, reduced rural income and loss of opportunity for socio-economic and forestry development.

In order to address the above problems and related issues, three working groups were set up:

· Rattan supply issues from natural forests and plantations (Chairman: Mr. Tesoro);

· Socio-economic issues: rural incomes, industrial development and economic incentives (Chairman: Mr. Belcher); and

· Environment and conservation of rattan (Chairman: Mr. Vongkaluang).

The task of the working groups was to revisit the issues raised during the meeting with regard to the respective topics and to prepare a report identifying key problems, possible solutions and strategies for action at the local, regional and international levels, including institutional and policy issues; and formulating recommendations for all relevant stakeholders (Appendix 3).

The results of the three working groups and their review in the plenary led to the following major conclusions and recommendations, the content of which was approved in principle in the closing plenary session. After the session, however, further editing was provided by the FAO Secretariat, and the edited version was circulated after the meeting so as to have full endorsement of the final text by all participants.

The participants agreed that this meeting was the first step of a process in the formulation and application of global concerted collaboration among key stakeholders in the sustainable development of the rattan sector. The meeting recommended that FAO and INBAR should bring the recommendations and conclusions of this meeting to the attention of their regional intergovernmental bodies for their review and possible endorsement.

A. Key observations

Based on the papers presented and ensuing discussions, the meeting emphasized the economic, socio-cultural and ecological importance of rattan to a large number of people in the world and noted that rattan resources in their natural range of tropical forests in Asia and Africa were being depleted through overexploitation, inadequate replenishment, poor forest management and loss of forest habitats. There was a need to ensure a sustainable supply of rattan through improved and equitable management.

The meeting recalled that:

· there were approximately 600 species of rattans, of which some 10 percent were commercial species. Many species, including some of commercial importance, had very restricted natural ranges. The majority of the world rattan resources (by volumes and by number of species) were in one country - Indonesia.

· rattan was an important commodity in international trade. At the local level, it was of critical relevance for rural livelihood strategies as a primary, supplementary and/or emergency source of income. Rattan collection complemented agriculture in terms of seasonal labour and as a source of capital for agricultural inputs.

· the rattan sector was characterized by a variety of stakeholders with different needs and interests, such as rattan growers, raw material collectors, manufacturers and traders, and it functioned within a complex and dynamic socio-economic, political and ecological context. Rattan was gathered by unorganized or organized collectors, the latter either under contract or in debt relationships with traders and farmers/cultivators. In addition, there was a loss of traditional rattan management practices and, at the same time, increasing competition for resources. Linkages between industry, traders, collectors/cultivators and research and development efforts were weak. Rattan manufacturing and trade were fragmented and diverse in size and markets, with a focus on export.

The meeting highlighted that taxonomic knowledge of species was patchy and available information conflicting. Likewise patchy was the knowledge of biological aspects, e.g. pollination and gene flow. In spite of the IUCN Red List review of 1998, the conservation status of rattans was not well known and it was difficult to assess and monitor. In addition, rattan species were assumed not to be "safe" in protected areas or in national parks, as harvesting in such areas was usually permitted or tolerated. It was also assumed that the genetic basis of rattan species was narrowing. Some species were likely to be at risk of extinction.

The meeting underlined that there could be no sustainable supply of rattan, if the forests in which they grew were not managed sustainably. In its natural habitat, rattan was not as yet managed, and rattan received low priority in national forest and conservation policies. There was no dedicated rattan development institution in any country as rattan was usually subsumed within the forestry services, and the few existing national rattan programmes were weak and with limited research and development capacity. With a few exceptions, national forest inventories did not include rattan, and information on the resource base was scarce. However, in large tracts of degraded and logged-over forests, (re-)introduction and management of rattan had the potential to complement significantly the value of these forests.

The meeting was informed that significant advances had been made in the understanding of growing rattan as a plantation crop. Although community-based or smallholder rattan gardens could be profitable in some situations, the profitability of industrial-scale plantations in Asia was currently uncertain, as other land uses were more lucrative. As a result of this, private-sector investment in industrial-scale rattan plantations had declined. The meeting took note that existing rattan plantations had been converted into more profitable crops like oil palm.

The meeting was further informed that rattan production was also affected by the low return to gatherers, resulting in weak incentives for sustainable rattan harvesting and management. A number of factors contributed to the low returns. Foremost among these were uncertain property rights, the dispersed nature of production and inconsistent cane quality. In several countries, prices and competition had been affected by the remoteness of collecting areas and poor transportation; "illegal" harvesting; poor market information; lack of organization among collectors; large post-harvest losses due to insect and fungal infestation; prohibitive tax policies; export barriers; and informal taxes that depressed raw material prices.

The meeting noted that international agencies such as INBAR, CIFOR, IPGRI, FAO and ITTO addressed rattan management, either directly or indirectly, within their programmes. National focal points for member countries of INBAR on rattan information had been established with the primary function to identify key stakeholders and their increasing involvement, to collect statistical data and exchange information in the local languages.

B. Conclusions

In the light of the above, the meeting concluded that there was a wide variety of potential interventions that could assist the different stakeholder groups. Raw material producers and smallholders could be encouraged to, and assisted in, managing local resources on a more sustainable and productive basis, through the establishment of community forest management practices, long-term concessions, local land-use planning and the provision of resource and/or land tenure rights, in conjunction with approved management plans.

At the processing level, needs were particularly great at the artisanal level. Potential interventions that might assist industry included improving entrepreneurship and competitiveness; training of advisers; improving post-harvest treatment and quality control; market deregulation and improved market information; establishment of design centres; and trade fairs. Also, given the nature of the resource users and the industry being generally cottage and small scale, employing socially disadvantaged groups, rattan products could become ideal commodities for promotion as rainforest conservation products.

The meeting identified the following key actions to be initiated immediately for enhancing a more sustainable supply of rattan:


· intensifying ex situ and in situ conservation efforts in a more coordinated and organized manner among countries in the regions;

· developing suitable methods for resource assessments, including studies on growth, yield, basic biology and taxonomy of rattan species;

· improving techniques of enrichment planting and management of rattan in degraded forests, and a wide dissemination of the available guidelines for rattan planting.


· increasing the knowledge of the properties of commercial species and of the potential of underutilized/ lesser known species;

· improving and disseminating technologies for reducing post-harvesting losses, biological deterioration, improved storage and processing;

· introduction of quality grading.

Policies and institutional support:

· awareness raising on the importance of the rattan sector to decision-makers at all levels;

· institutional strengthening and coordination regarding rattan conservation, management and processing issues, including the promotion of increased government and private sector cooperation /coordination to enhance the contribution of rattan to poverty alleviation and economic prosperity;

· providing tenure security to rattan gatherers and planters by incorporating them into community-based forest management schemes;

· introducing incentive schemes for rattan cultivation to increase the economic benefits for rural households and smallholder plantations in Asia, such as providing credit and technical assistance for small-scale plantation development and favourable harvesting and marketing arrangements;

· introducing market deregulation to benefit rattan collectors and traders (i.e. removing transport barriers; support for improved collection and dissemination of market information; extension in processing techniques);

· providing comprehensive training and support to local specialists in rattan-producing countries in taxonomy, management and processing, complemented with "twinning arrangements" among relevant institutions in the regions.

C. Recommendations

The expert consultation recommended for immediate follow-up:

· to FAO to:

· to INBAR to:

The expert consultation recommended that the governments of countries with rattan resources be encouraged:

· At the national level to:

· In support to actions at the international level to:

The expert consultation emphasized the potential of enhancing regional cooperation through information exchange; collaborative research and development; training; and material exchange to promote rattan as a vehicle for achieving social, economic and environmental sustainability in rattan-producing countries. To this end, the expert consultation called for a concerted effort of governments, the private sector, NGOs and relevant international agencies.


Previous PageTable Of ContentsNext Page