Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


8. EMISSIONS


Emissions from animal waste
Emissions from synthetic fertilizer use
Emissions from enteric fermentation
Emissions from wetland rice cultivation

Emissions from animal waste

A number of estimates are available of the amount of nutrients in animal excreta. For example, the American Society of Agricultural Engineers (Midwest Plan Service, 1985) produced estimates of manure production for North American conditions, ECETOC (1994) produced estimates for European conditions and Bouwman et al. (1995) estimated worldwide excretion of nitrogen. The nitrogen excretion by animals is determined largely by the maintenance requirements of the animal, the amount of nitrogen in the milk production and the amount accumulating in meat. In general, extensive production systems are less efficient in N use than intensively producing systems. Therefore, nitrogen excretion does not increase proportionally with the production per head.

To estimate the current production of nitrogen by animals the excretion factors of Bouwman et al. (1995) are used (Table 17). The body weight and milk production largely determines the total feed intake (IPCC, 1995; Livestock Environment Study, in prep.). Estimates of the current body weights and feed intake averaged over the total population of an animal category are available for continents (IPCC, 1995). To approximate changes in body weights for non-dairy cattle, carcass weights were used as a correlate, in which the nitrogen excretion increases linearly towards a value between the current excretion in that region and the West European excretion. For dairy cattle the annual milk production per head is taken as a correlate for the nitrogen excretion, with a similar linear increase towards the European values. For the other animal categories constant N excretion rates were used, as these rates are not as variable for total regional populations as the N excretion of cattle (Bouwman et al., 1995).

TABLE 17
Nitrogen excretion, ammonia volatilization loss, feed intake and methane conversion factors for different animal categories

Category

Nitrogen excretion

NH3 loss

Feed intake

CH4 conversion

(kg/head/yr)

(%)

MJ/day

(%)

Non-dairy cattle

40-45

20

60-130

6

Dairy cattle

60-100

30

100-250

6

Pigs

11

40

13-38

0.6-1.3

Sheep and goats

10

10

13-20

5

Poultry

0.5

40

-

-

Camels

55

20

100

7

Nitrogen excretion estimates based on Bouwman et al. (1995), NH3 loss from RIVM-EDGAR (1995), feed intake and methane conversion from IPCC (1995).

The ranges of nitrogen excretion are given in Table 17. Although the body weight may not be proportional to carcass weight for non-dairy cattle, the relation used describes the increasing efficiency of nutrient use generally observed in developing livestock production systems (see, for example, ECETOC, 1994). To calculate the total nutrient excretion (N + P2O5 + K2O), factors specific for animal categories from Midwest Plan Service (1985) were used. According to the medium scenario for the period 1990-2010 the populations of the different animal categories in the developing countries will continue the fast increase observed in the past decades (Table 18). The total excretion calculated on the basis of the above assumptions varies between regions depending on the population and productivity scenarios of the different animal categories (Figure 7). In most regions, however, the animal excretion is dominated by cattle. The total nutrient excretion in all developing countries showed a fast increase of 1.75% per year in the period 1960-1990; the increase in the medium scenario will continue at a fast rate of 1.5% per year in the period 1990-2010, and somewhat slower in 2010-2025 (1.2% per year).

After 2025 the excretion will stabilize at a level of 250 million ton (Figure 7h). Comparison of the different scenarios shows that the low scenario results in higher, and the high scenario in lower waste production per unit product than the medium scenario (Figure 8). This results largely from the assumptions on the efficiency of nutrient use in the different scenarios. Emissions of NH3, N2O and CH4 from animal waste have been estimated.

Ammonia (NH3)

The volatilization of NH3 from animal wastes depends on whether the waste is dropped in a stable or in the field. The type of stable is important for the NH3 losses, as well as the management of the waste. Field emissions are determined by many factors, of which wind speed, temperature and rainfall are the most important. In their global inventory Bouwman et al. (in prep.) used NH3 volatilization rates of 15-20% for stable and storage conditions, 25% for NH3 loss for manure application as fertilizer, and 10-15% for grazing conditions. The resulting estimates for the NH3 losses from animal waste vary from 40% for poultry to 20-30% for cattle (Table 17).

TABLE 18
Populations of different animal categories for three different scenarios. M, H, L = medium, high and low scenario. Populations in million heads

Category

'61/63

'69/71

'79/81

1989BY

'89/91

2010

2025

2050

2075

2100

Cattle

M

689

796

909

1005

1020

1299

1431

1428

1283

1235

H






1072

1143

1073

942

909

L






1487

1697

1816

1720

1704

Dairy cattle

M

86

100

131

158

160

197

252

306

279

239

H






158

172

171

150

144

L






224

310

427

450

452

Pigs

M

171

291

435

486

500

857

984

902

846

891

H






807

865

788

703

712

L






929

1142

1209

1323

1460

Sheep and goats

M

760

842

982

1129

1136

1478

2192

3286

4084

4875

H






1352

1568

1680

1596

1529

L






2001

2947

4446

5549

6646

Poultry

M

1851

2470

3757

6469

6770

10629

13968

16893

19834

20509

H






9261

12039

13983

15033

15038

L






12296

17357

22769

26696

27936

FIGURE 7
Estimated current and future animal nutrient excretion for the medium scenario from all animal categories. Excretion in million ton N + P2O5 + K2O.

a. East Asia

b. China and C. P. Asian countries

c. South Asia

d. Near East in Asia

e. North Africa

f. Sub-Saharan Africa

g. Latin America

h. All developing incl. China

TABLE 19
Ammonia emission (a) and nitrous oxide emission (b) from animal excreta for developing countries for 1990. Emissions in million metric tons N per year

Region

1960

1970

1980

1990

2010

2025

2050

a. NH3-N

East Asia

0.3

0.4

0.4

0.6

0.9

1.0

1.2

China and C.P. Asian countries

1.2

1.9

2.5

3.4

5.7

7.4

7.4

South Asia

2.8

3.0

3.5

3.9

5.3

6.1

6.9

Near East in Asia

0,5

0.5

0.6

0.6

0.8

1.1

1.4

North Africa

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.4

0.5

Sub-Saharan Africa

1.2

1.5

1.8

2.1

2.7

3.6

4.7

Latin America

2.1

2.5

3.3

3.7

4.4

4.4

4.2

Developing

8

10

12

15

20

24

26

Developed




8




World




23




b. N2O

East Asia

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

China and C.P. Asian countries

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.3

South Asia

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.3

0.3

Near East in Asia

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

North Africa

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Sub-Saharan Africa

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.2

Latin America

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

Developing

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.6

0.9

1.0

1.2

Developed




0.4




World




1.0




Emission calculations based on RIVM-EDGAR (1995).

FIGURE 8 - Estimated current and future animal nutrient excretion from all animal categories and synthetic fertilizer use in all developing countries including China. Excretion and fertilizer in N + P2O5 + K2O.

Because in most regions the excretion is dominated by cattle, the total regional NH3 loss can be expected to be close to that of cattle. The current emission of NH3 associated with the ~ 100 million ton N in animal waste is about 23 million ton NH3-N per year (Table 19). For developing countries including China, the NH3 emissions amount to about 16 million ton NH3-N per year from the 70 million ton of nitrogen in excreta. The percentage of NH3 loss from animal excreta in developed countries is very close to that in developed countries (Bouwman et al., in prep.). This indicates that the productivity level and the animal waste management have minor influence on the NH3 losses for large regions of the world.

Therefore, in the emission scenario the NH3 loss rates are assumed to be constant in time, and the nitrogen excretion varies according to the above assumptions (Table 17). It must be noted that considerable reductions in NH3 losses can be achieved for animal excreta applied as fertilizer to arable land1. In the medium scenario the NH3 emission from animal waste in the developing countries will increase considerably from current 15 million tons NH3-N per year to 20 million tons in 2010, and 24 million tons in 2025. After 2025 the emissions increase at a much slower rate to 26 million tons in 2050. (Table 19).

1 A higher N recovery can be achieved from reduction of NH3 volatilization by incorporating the manure. At the same time the animal manure substitutes part of the synthetic fertilizer.

Nitrous oxide (N2O)

Very few measurement data are available from literature for nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from animal waste. Therefore, the emission rate of 1% proposed by Bouwman et al. (1995) is used for both grazing and confined animals2. The annual emission of N2O from animal excreta also showed a rapid increase from 0.4 million ton N2O-N in 1960 to 0.6 million ton in 1990, and further to 1.2 million ton in 2050 (Table 19). In comparison, the annual N2O emissions estimated for 1990 for the developed countries were 0.4 million tons (Table 19).

2 This simple method does not account for differences in animal waste management systems. The animal waste management is an important factor regulating N2O emission rates. For example, low emission rates of <0.01% of the N from anaerobic digesters can be expected, and high emissions of up to 15% N from deep litter stables (IPCC/OECD preliminary report of the IPCC/OECD working group on N2O emissions from agriculture [in prep]. This group is preparing more default estimates of N2O from grazing animals and animal waste management systems, including animal manure applied as fertilizer).

Methane (CH4)

The emission of CH4 from animal waste depends on the waste management system. Highest CH4 emissions occur where animal waste is stored in lagoons, or where the waste is stored in liquid form or as a slurry. These systems are not widespread in the developing countries, except in parts of Asia. In the developing countries most of the non-dairy cattle are grazing animals. In dairy production both grazing and daily spreading of manure are widespread. Much of the pig manure in Asia is stored in liquid form.

Of the global emission of 10-15 million ton CH4 per year, the developing countries may contribute some 30%. The emission rates can be assumed constant in the future scenarios, and then the emission from developing countries would increase from the current ~ 4 to perhaps ~7 million ton CH4 per year in 2050. However, the amount of waste produced in developing countries will increase in all scenarios, as discussed above. This may create waste disposal problems, whereby other systems with high emission rates (such as lagoon or liquid storage systems) may increasingly be adopted. With the increase of animal waste production resulting from the scenarios (Figures 8 and 9), this may lead to a significant increase in the emission from developing countries. Assuming that the emission rates for the year 2050 are equal to those used for current European emissions by IPCC (1995), the emission in 2050 from developing countries would perhaps be 50 million tons CH4 per year, which is close to the estimated 80 million ton CH4 from enteric fermentation in 2050 (Figure 10).

FIGURE 9
Comparison of fertilizer use and animal nutrient excretion for the medium scenario. Nutrients in million ton N + P2O5 + K2O.

a. East Asia

b. China and C. P. Asian countries

c. South Asia

d. Near East in Asia

e. North Africa

f. Sub-Saharan Africa

g. Latin America

h. All developing incl. China

Emissions from synthetic fertilizer use

The scenarios of synthetic fertilizer use presented in Chapter 6 can be used to produce estimates of emission scenarios of nitrous oxide. The fraction N in of the total NPK use as presented in Appendix 18 does not show much variation over the period 1960-1990. Therefore, the percentage N in the NPK fertilizer used in the fertilizer scenario is the average 1960-1990 level. On the basis of the NPK scenario and the assumed constant N fraction, the N fertilizer use calculated for the developing countries will increase from the current 41 million ton N per year to 77 million ton in 2010, 105 million ton in 2025 and close to 140 million ton in 2050 for the medium fertilizer scenario variant.

The estimated global emission of NH3 from current synthetic N fertilizer use is about 9 million ton N per year. Most of this occurs in the developing countries (7.5 million ton N), and about half in China. The average N losses as ammonia from synthetic fertilizer use of 18% in developing countries is much higher than that in developed countries (5%). The loss rates are related to the type of fertilizer and to the climatic conditions. In addition, the NH3 emission may be higher in wetland rice cultivation than in dryland fields. In developing countries about 50% of the nitrogen fertilizer used is in the form of urea (IFA, 1994). Asman and Bouwman (1995) indicated that NH3 losses from urea may be 25% in tropical regions and 15% in temperate climates. In China 40-50% of the nitrogen fertilizer used is in the form of ammonium bicarbonate (Asman and Bouwman, 1995), which is a highly volatile compound3. The NH3 loss from ammonium bicarbonate may be 30% in the tropics and 20% in temperate zones. Contrary, the NH3 loss from injected anhydrous ammonia, which is widely used in the USA, is only 4% (Asman and Bouwman, 1995).

3 Urea is less volatile than ammonium bicarbonate. In the soil urea is converted to ammonium bicarbonate by the enzyme urease, which takes about 2-3 days.

It is obvious that future NH3 emissions depend very much on the type of fertilizer. The mix of N fertilizers may change in the future, so that the average NH3 loss rate may also change. Here, it is assumed that all developing countries achieve a reduction of NH3 losses to a rate of 5%, equal to the current loss rate for developing countries. The N fertilizer thus saved would be 5 million ton N per year, which is 13% of the current fertilizer N use in developing countries and 7% of current global N fertilizer use4. If the loss rate of 5% is applied to the future scenarios of fertilizer use, the NH3 loss from fertilizers will still be lower in 2025 than the current emission (Table 20).

4 The saving in fertilizer represents about US$ 2 billion at current prices, using the October 1995 price of urea. The saving of 5 million ton N is the equivalent of the nitrogen content of 250 million ton rice, about equal to the total Chinese rice consumption in 1990.

Nitrous oxide emissions amount to 1.25 ± 1 % of the nitrogen applied. This estimate is the average for all fertilizer types, as proposed by Bouwman (1995) and adopted by IPCC (1995). The emission rates vary from one fertilizer type to another (Bouwman, 1995). For example, the N2O loss from injected anhydrous ammonia is generally much higher than losses evolving from nitrate-based fertilizers. However, the data set available from measurements published in the literature is too limited to produce reliable estimates of emission rates by fertilizer type (Bouwman, 1995). According to the medium fertilizer scenario this loss of 1.25% results in an increase from the current 0.5 million ton N2O-N to 1.0 million ton N in 2010, and further to 1.7 million ton N in 2050 for all developing countries including China (Table 21).

FIGURE 10
Estimated current and future methane emission from all animal categories for the medium scenario. Methane emission in million ton CH4 per year.

a. East Asia

b. China and C. P. Asian countries

c. South Asia

d. Near East in Asia

e. North Africa

f. Sub-Saharan Africa

g. Latin America

h. All developing incl. China

TABLE 20
Synthetic N fertilizer use in 1990 and NH3 emission from fertilizers

Region

N fertilizer use in 1990 (Mton N)

NH3 loss in 1990 (%)

NH3 loss in 1990 (Mton N)

NH3 loss of 5% (Mton N)

1990

2010

2025

East Asia

3.4

19

0.6

0.2

0.3

0.4

CP Asia

20.3

18

3.7

1.0

1.6

2.0

South Asia

9.8

21

2.1

0.5

1.1

1.6

Near East Asia

2.4

13

0.3

0.1

0.3

0.4

North Africa

1.1

12

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

Sub-Saharan Africa

0.7

10

0.1

0.0

0.1

0.2

Latin America

3.8

15

0.6

0.2

0.4

0.5

Developing

41

18

7.5

2.1

3.9

5.3

Developed

34

5

1.7

1.7



World

76

12

9.2

3.8



TABLE 21
Emission of N2O caused by synthetic fertilizer application. Emission in million ton N2O-N per year

Region

1960

1970

1980

1990

2010

2025

2050

East Asia

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.1

China and C.P. Asian countries

0.0

0.0

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

South Asia

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.3

0.4

0.5

Near East in Asia

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.1

North Africa

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

Sub-Saharan Africa

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

Latin America

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.2

Developing

0.0

0.1

0.3

0.5

1.0

1.3

1.7

Developed

0.1

0.3

0.4

0.4




World

0.2

0.4

0.8

1.0




Emissions from enteric fermentation

The current CH4 emission associated with enteric fermentation by cattle, pigs, sheep and goats, and camels, is calculated with the method described in IPCC (1995). Future emission rates are estimated on the basis of similar assumptions to those used to estimate nitrogen excretion. The animal body weight is assumed to determine the future energy intake, and carcass weight is used as a correlate for the body weight for all animals, except dairy cattle, where milk production is assumed to determine the energy intake. The CH4 emission is calculated from the energy intake as follows: emission (kg/head/yr) = GEI x Y / EC, where GEI is the gross energy intake (MJ/head/day) (Table 17), Y the methane conversion rate in decimal form (Table 17), and EC the conversion factor to compute methane emission (EC = 55.65 MJ/kg of methane). The range of gross energy intake estimated for the different animal categories (Table 17) shows much more variability than the nitrogen excretion ranges. This reflects the observed large differences in the CH4 emission per animal between intensive and extensive production systems (IPCC, 1995).

FIGURE 11 - Estimated current and future methane emission from all animal categories for three scenarios in all developing countries, including China

The CH4 emissions by animal category for the different regions (Figure 10) show that cattle is by far the major source of CH4 from enteric fermentation. Latin America and South Asia, with their large cattle populations, are important contributors to the total emission from all developing countries. The current contribution to the global emission from all developing countries is about 50%. The emission of CH4 from enteric fermentation from developing countries increases in the medium scenario by about a factor of 2. Comparison of the different scenarios shows that the low scenario results in higher, and the high scenario in lower total emission than the medium scenario (Figure 11). This result is very similar to the scenarios of nutrients in animal waste, and is caused by the higher feed use efficiency in more intensive production systems.

Emissions from wetland rice cultivation

In the most recent IPCC assessment (Prather et al., 1995) rice cultivation is considered to be a minor global source of CH4, contributing less than 10% and probably only about 5% to the global emission of about 500 million ton CH4 per year. More than 90% of the global rice production occurs in developing countries. No attempt has been made to estimate future emissions. However, the general tendency in the medium scenario is a nearly constant harvested area of rice. If the CH4 emission per hectare of rice does not change, the source strength will, therefore, not change in the medium scenario (Figure 12). The global rice area will, however, increase in the low scenario. If the CH4 emission is related to the biomass production, an important increase of the global emission can be expected because the global rice production will double between 1990 and 2050.

FIGURE 12
Results of the scenario for rice cultivation

a) total, rainfed and irrigated harvested areas (in million ha) for medium scenario;

b) index of production and area for medium scenario, 1990 = 100.


Previous Page Top of Page Next Page