Nutrition-Sensitive Social Protection Programs within Food Systems

Olney, D.K.; Gelli, A.; Kumar, N.; Alderman, H.; Go, A.; Raza, A.; Owens, J.; Grinspun, A.; Bhalla, G.; Benammour, O

Nutrition-Sensitive Social Protection Programs within Food Systems

Year of publication 2021

Place of publication Washington, DC, USA ;

Pages 109 p.

Author Olney, D.K.; Gelli, A.; Kumar, N.; Alderman, H.; Go, A.; Raza, A.; Owens, J.; Grinspun, A.; Bhalla, G.; Benammour, O

Publisher FAO ; IFPRI ;

Product type Article

Edition 1

Full item page

Synopsis (short abstract) Investments in social assistance programs (SAPs) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are increasing. As investments increase, the objectives of these programs are expanding from focusing on reducing poverty to addressing other social issues such as improving diets and nutrition. At the same time, there is increasing interest in addressing all forms of malnutrition within the framework of food systems. Given the intersections between SAPs and food systems, we reviewed the effectiveness of SAPs (agriculture asset transfers, cash transfers, in-kind transfers, vouchers, public works, and school meals programs) for reducing all forms of malnutrition across the lifecycle within a food systems framework. As several programs included multiple treatment arms, each representing a unique program design, we used study arm as the unit of analysis and assessed the proportion of study arms with positive or negative program impacts on diet and nutrition outcomes among men, women and children. The majority of the studies included in this review were from evaluations of agriculture asset, cash, and in-kind transfer programs. There was clear evidence of positive impacts on women’s and children’s diet-related outcomes. Very few studies assessed program impact on women’s nutritional status outcomes. However, there was some evidence of impacts on increasing body mass index and hemoglobin concentration (Hb) with in-kind transfer programs. Among children, several study arms across the agriculture asset, cash, and in-kind transfer programs found positive impacts on increasing height-for-age Z-score (33%-45% of study arms) and weight-for-height Z-score (33%-50% of study arms) and decreasing the prevalence of wasting (43%-60% of study arms). Cash and in-kind transfer programs also found positive effects on reducing stunting prevalence in 33% and 45% of study arms, respectively. Lastly, a few study arms assessed program impact on increasing Hb with some evidence of positive impacts in in-kind and school feeding programs. There was a paucity of relevant evidence of the effectiveness of voucher and public works programs on diet and nutrition outcomes, for men’s outcomes, and on micronutrient status. Several challenges remain in understanding the potential for SAPs to improve diet and nutrition outcomes within food systems including the heterogeneity of program and evaluation designs, populations targeted by the programs, and included in evaluations and indicators used to assess impact. Addressing these challenges in future evaluations is important for informing program and policy actions to improve the effectiveness of SAPs within food systems for improving diet and nutrition outcomes across the lifecycle.

This is a co-published publication between International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO), also available from IFPRI source page.

Last updated date 10/11/2021 (author list has been updated), see corrigendum

Cite this content as:

Olney, D.K.; Gelli, A.; Kumar, N.; Alderman, H.; Go, A.; Raza, A.; Owens, J.; Grinspun, A.; Bhalla, G.; Benammour, O. 2021. Nutrition-Sensitive Social Protection Programs within Food Systems. FPRI Discussion Paper 2044. FAO and IFPRI. Washington DC. https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.134593

Language English

Related items

Showing items related by metadata.

Book (stand-alone)

Evaluating the impacts of cash and complementary agricultural support interventions in fragile settings
The case of Somalia
2022

Also available in:

No results found.

This study examines the FAO cash plus agriculture program in Somalia. This multi-faceted intervention provides agricultural inputs, training and cash transfers to vulnerable agro-pastoralist households living in districts and villages that experienced severe weather shocks. We exploit variations in the implementation of this program to assess the effect of receiving inputs only and inputs plus cash on a range of protective and productive outcomes. Specifically, we make use of household survey data collected in 2019 and apply a quasi-experimental Inverse Probability Weighted Regression Analysis (IPWRA) matching approach to estimate the impact of the two different interventions on food security, assets, adoption of inputs and adoption of agricultural practices. We find positive and significant impacts on a number of productive outcomes and some difference between the two treatments: while inputs seem to increase asset wealth, cash plus reduces food insecurity and higher levels of income diversification, suggesting that the cash component facilitates investments in livelihoods diversification. Moreover, we find evidence of heterogeneous impacts under conditions of weather shocks, and between socio-economic segments of the population.
Book (stand-alone)

¿Más calorías o más diversidad? Evaluación econométrica de las repercusiones de los programas de transferencia PROGRESA y PROCAMPO en la seguridad económica del México rural 2002

Also available in:

No results found.

This paper examines the PROGRESA and PROCAMPO cash transfer programmes in Mexico and evaluates their impact on household food security and nutrition. These two programmes differ in their gender targeting, with PROGRESA aimed at women and PROCAMPO generally at men, and conditionality, with PROGRESA linked to development of human capital of children in the households and PROCAMPO linked to agricultural production. We try to answer the following questions. First, can a cash transfer programme geare d to agricultural production have the same impact on food security as a cash transfer programme geared to consumption through purchases? Second, do eligibility requirements (gender of the recipient) and conditionality in the provision of cash transfers matter? Our results suggest that, contrary to conventional wisdom, men do not just drink away cash transfers and that monetary payments linked to a productive asset –land- can have as large or larger impact on food security as cash transfers not l inked to a productive asset. We show that both programs boost total food consumption and caloric intake in similar proportions. However, PROCAMPO has a larger impact on meat and vegetables consumption and PROGRESA on the other food category. We also find that cash transfers linked to information on nutrition and health increase food diversity. PROCAMPO households that also receive PROGRESA, and the information that goes with it, are more likely to be eating a more varied diet than households tha t get PROCAMPO only. All this suggests that the choice of programme design in terms of food security depends on objectives beyond total food consumption and caloric intake.
Document

The Impact of Conditional Cash Transfers in Nicaragua on Consumption, Productive Investments, and Labor Allocation
ESA Working Paper No. 07-11
2007

Also available in:

No results found.

This paper examines the effects of a conditional cash transfer program in Nicaragua on a wide range of outcomes related to productive investments. This is done using a randomized community level evaluation in which households were interviewed both before and after the program began in both randomly selected treatment and control areas. While limited information was collected on productive activities, the strength of the evaluation design permits a rigorous assessment of many possible productive investment behaviors. Overall, there is evidence of small increases in investments in economically productive activities and negative effects on labor supply for beneficiary households. This is unsurprising, given the findings from many studies that indicate that the bulk of the transfers are directed to current consumption, consistent with most programs secondary objective of increasing food expenditures. In contrast to the gains made in human capital development of children (reported elsewhere ), the potential for long term increases in consumption as a result of increased investment, while positive, may be limited.