The working group addressed issues, constraints and recommend actions relating to inter-country Agreements to establish operational procedures and share resources, information, personnel and equipment in situations of emergency. This would include review of the feasibility to share heavy land and aerial equipment and prospects for development on a wider geographic basis.
Working Group 2 (Legal Instruments)
Balatsos, P. (Greece)
Bekele, M. (Ethiopia)
Cedeño
Sánchez, O. (Mexico)
Heine, J. (South Africa)
Kizmaz, M.
(Turkey)
Mutch, R. (USA)
Sanhueza, P. (Chile)
Sneeuwjagt, R.
(Australia)
Vélez Muñoz, R. (Spain)
Paveri, M. (FAO, Chief,
FONP)
Mekouar, A. (FAO, LEGN)
Allard, G. (FAO, FORM)
Malagnoux, M. (FAO, FORC)
Forest Fire Emergency Cooperation Agreements
The Group identified the existence of a number of Forest Fire Emergency Co-operation Agreements at various levels, including:-
- central level
- local level
A list of Agreements known to exist and referred to by the experts in given in Annex 5.
It will be necessary to use the comprehensive and proven instruments as base documents for other countries seeking or providing assistance to derive their own Agreements suited to their unique circumstances.
Key contents to be considered by countries as a base for preparation of their Agreements are listed in Annex 6.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Considering that:
Forest fire management was closely linked to sustainable forest management practices;
Member countries were strongly encouraged to establish sustainable forest management policies and practices to reduce the flammability of forests. If sustainable practices were not established, then emergency responses of any kind would ultimately fail;
Member countries were encouraged to activate strong and effective fire prevention campaigns. It was better to prevent a wildfire than fight one. Prevention implies public awareness, equipment and infrastructure preparation, enforcement and fire fuel management;
Member countries were encouraged to develop effective emergency response procedures internally, so that they would be able to more effectively receive outside assistance;
Widespread emergencies in recent years in all regions of the world had underscored the importance of having International Agreements established in advance of fires;
Efficient emergency assistance required prior planning among all parties due to the nature of forest fires to prepare personnel, organisation, equipment, procedures, etc.
It was recommended that FAO and ITTO and other relevant partners:-
|
Agreement Type |
Country |
Agreement Partner Descriptions |
In-country |
||
USA |
National, with individual States (National Wildfire Coordinating Group | |
National with Military | ||
Mexico |
Federal Government with individual States | |
Federal (SEMARNAP) with Military | ||
Chile |
National Government with Regions | |
National Government with Private Sector | ||
Bilateral Agreements between Regions | ||
Bilateral Agreements between Regions and Private Sector | ||
Private to Private Sector Agreements | ||
Other Agreements with Armed Forces, Fire Brigades etc | ||
Australia |
Federal Government with individual States (large emergencies) | |
State to State agreements | ||
South Africa |
Agreements with Military | |
Agreements between Provinces and National Government (under formulation) | ||
France |
Prevention done within Forestry Sector | |
Fire Suppression under Civil Society (Military Corps) | ||
Centralized authority decides how, without formal Agreements | ||
Local Authorities have local mechanisms to share resources | ||
Ethiopia |
Individual Regions responsible | |
Federal level have funds for Emergency Plans to share resources | ||
Spain |
National Coordinating Committee establishes rules for Sharing Central Government resources to fight fire when Autonomous Region resources need | |
Bilateral Agreements between Regions (principle of single command, each agency covers costs of services provided) | ||
Agreements with Armed Forces | ||
Greece |
Resources centrally allocated in cooperation with Districts for fire suppression | |
Prevention: National leadership with funding to Regions | ||
Involvement of Local Authorities through personnel, volunteers | ||
Regions have Emergency Plans communicated to National Government | ||
Bilateral Agreements |
||
Spain |
Portugal, France and Morocco (Aircraft and equipment), West Mediterranean | |
Specific Coordinating Centre in each Country, Cost paid by receiving countries | ||
USA |
USA with Mexico | |
USA with Canada | ||
USA and Canada with Australia and New Zealand (under preparation) | ||
Chile |
Chile with Argentina | |
Turkey |
Central Government, Memo of Understanding with Other Countries for Fire Resources, allocated centrally and distributed at the local level |
A. An example exists between Canada and USA B An example exists between USA and Mexico II Annual Operating Plan specifying details of how to
accomplish emergency assistance. III Protocols to promote technical exchanges of personnel
between countries (a non-emergency assistance)
I National Legislation promoting International Agreements and
establishing the framework for such Agreements
(This requirement may vary
by country in terms of process)
I National Legislation or Other Enabling Protocols for Establishing Contents (Elements) for Agreements:
1 Establish Agreements between Governments for emergency assistance if they do not exist. Determine appropriate channels for establishing Agreements. This will differ by country as how this is to be done.
2 Identify the Central Agency or Contact Point to coordinate the exchange of resources.
3 Specify Sending Party and Receiving Party.
4 Specify type of resources that may be sent or received.
5 Specify how costs will be allocated. Usually Receiving Party pays.
6 Specify time for reimbursements.
7 Specify who controls resources.
8 Specify how to cover losses and damages.
9 Specify the process for recalling resources to return them to sending party.
10 Specify Liability arrangements for damages (both ways). Fatal accidents, insurance, etc.
11 Specify qualifications of people.
12 Specify how to mediate disputes.
Note: Principle for success: Good will and practical solutions are essential in developing Agreements
II Checklist for Annual Operating Plan to Provide Emergency Fire Assistance (Bilaterally or Multi-laterally)
1 State purpose of assistance.
2 Cite authorities.
3 Detail general procedures
(i) Who requests (how?)
(ii)
Reimbursements
(iii) Identify types of resources
(iv) Personnel
(a) Daily rate and pay
(b) Lodging
(c) Meals
and travel
(d) Medical costs, insurance coverage
(e) Safety, health
and welfare
(f) Safety equipment
(g) Who provides liaison?
(h)
Compensation claims for death and injury
(i) Specify indemnity procedures
4 Equipment and supplies.
5 Billing and payment procedures and currencies.
6 Situation reporting daily.
7 Authorization, signatures.
8 Process for re-call of resources.
9 Customs considerations.
10 Resolution of logistical limitations and constraints.
Note 1: Successful emergency assistance requires careful prior planning and review.
Note 2: Elements may need to be adapted to suit the conditions existing in different countries
III Protocols for Technical Exchanges of Personnel Among Countries
1 Authority
2 Qualifications and Objectives
3 Requests
4 Procedures and Payment (loss, damage, injury)
5 Documentation report that evaluates the exchange
6 Signatures for Approval
Additional Notes:
Agreements, Operational Plans and Protocols could be to:
1 Provide for exchanges of technical information, not people, on a recurring basis.
2 Share information regarding individual serious fires to other partners.
3 Exchange information regarding technical support in fighting fires from private vendors who supply equipment.
4 Consider contract requirements for aircraft.
5 Determine responsibilities and opportunities for providing technical assistance to developing countries. Identify countries or organizations to provide such assistance.
Country |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
Europe |
||||||||||||
Spain |
||||||||||||
|
Italy |
||||||||||||
|
Greece |
||||||||||||
|
Turkey |
||||||||||||
|
Baltic States |
||||||||||||
|
Russia |
||||||||||||
|
N. America |
||||||||||||
|
USA |
||||||||||||
|
Canada |
||||||||||||
|
C/S America |
||||||||||||
|
Mexico |
||||||||||||
|
Brazil |
||||||||||||
|
Chile |
||||||||||||
|
Asia |
||||||||||||
|
Indonesia |
||||||||||||
|
Thailand |
||||||||||||
|
Pacific |
||||||||||||
|
Australia |
||||||||||||
|
NZ |
||||||||||||
|
Africa |
||||||||||||
|
Ethiopia |
||||||||||||
|
E. Africa |
||||||||||||
|
Sth Africa |
||||||||||||
|
Difficult Fire Season - Help May be Needed from other Countries | ||||||||||||
|
Generally Lesser Danger | ||||||||||||
|
Low Danger, Help May be Offered to Other Countries | ||||||||||||
This table represents the recording of fire seasons by experts attending the meeting and is reproduced as an example only. The experts recommended that a schedule on these lines be prepared to evaluate the high, medium and low danger periods in all countries and regions as a first step to gauge potential for giving and/or receiving international assistance, to be requested and organizationally prepared in advance of high risk periods.
(In
accordance with expert meeting recommendation, no attempt was made to prioritize
actions)
|
Recommended |
Provisional Time Schedule of Actions by Month- starting April 2001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Actions |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 | |
|
Policy |
(i) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(ii) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Technical Support |
(i) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(ii) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(iii) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(iv) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(v) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(vi) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Information & Data Base |
(i) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(ii) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(iii) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(iv) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(v) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Emergency Response |
(i) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(ii) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(iii) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(iv) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(v) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(vi) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(vii) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(viii) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(ix) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(x) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Collaborating Agencies |
(i) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(ii) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Legend |
Approximate Duration of Activity |
Continuous Activity | |||||||||||||||||||||||