Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


4. Analyses of production records from Chitedze and Bwemba


Introduction
Chitedze agricultural research station
Bwemba livestock multiplication centre
Reproductive performance of cows at Chitedze
Productive performance of cows at Chitedze
Reproductive performance of cows at Bwemba
Productive performance of cows at Bwemba


Introduction

The Chitedze Agricultural Research Station and the Bwemba Livestock Multiplication Centre are both in the Central Region of Malawi, located about 10 km apart and are within 16 km of Lilongwe. Most of the innovations in dairy-herd management practiced on smallholder dairy farms in Malawi were tested first at the Chitedze Research Station, which thus has close links with smallholder dairy operations. Bwemba Livestock Multiplication Centre has served as the main station from which crossbred heifers are issued to smallholder dairy farmers in the Central and Northern Regions. The analyses of dairy production records from these two centres are therefore integral to the overall evaluation of the productivity of crossbred cattle in Malawi and also provide background information to which the productivity of the smallholders' dairy cattle could be related.

Chitedze agricultural research station


Management practices


Chitedze Agricultural Research Station is situated about 16 kilometers west of Lilongwe, at 14° S. 33° 45'E and 1050 metres a.s.l. It was established in 1959 primarily to conduct research on crops. Research on beef and dairy cattle started much later. The objectives of the livestock research at Chitedze are to:

1. Improve the indigenous Malawi Zebu cattle by selection within the breed;

2. Improve milk production through crossbreeding Malawi Zebus with imported Friesian semen;

3. Improve beef production through crossbreeding Malawi Zebus with exotic breeds, e.g. Brahman cattle; and to

4. Study the utilization of local forages and crop residues by livestock.

Management practices

Breeding and milking cows: Heifers were mated for the first time when they attained a minimum weight of 340 kg at about 29 months of age. Until November 1983 seasonal breeding was practiced, the breeding season being December to February. Pregnant heifers were separated from the other heifers and were placed in a semi-intensive feeding facility and then brought to the main cow herd to await calving. Cows and heifers were 'steamed up' from the seventh month of pregnancy until calving. Cows and heifers in their last month of pregnancy were separated from the main herd for parturition. Calves stayed with their dams for 2 days, during which the dams were not milked. From the 3rd to the 7th day postpartum the cows were milked once a day in the morning, after which the calves were suckled. From the 5th day the cows were milked twice a day. Milk from each cow was weighed at each milking. The calves were suckled by the dams for 30 minutes after morning and evening milkings. Calves were weaned at 12 weeks old, and male calves were castrated about 3 weeks after weaning. Since 1981 calves have been weighed every 2 weeks until weaning.

Weaner calves: Weaners were kept at the station for a year, during which they were allowed to graze during the day but were penned at night. Each weaner received 1.5 to 2.0 kg of maize bran per day. After one year, female yearlings were put in a semi-intensive facility where they grazed day and night and received maize-bran supplements. The yearlings were kept under this system until they reached a minimum weight of 340 kg, at about 2 1/4 years old, and were then served.

Yearling steers were put on feeding trials or were fattened for slaughter.

Health management: The cattle were drenched against worms and flukes every 3 months, and were sprayed once a week. The most common health problems on the station were diarrhoea among calves and weaners, and footrot and mastitis among cows. Mortality among both old and young stock was minimal.

Bwemba livestock multiplication centre


Management practices


The Bwemba centre was established in 1973 as one of several livestock centres set up to facilitate the livestock activities of the Ministry of Agriculture, which were concentrated in Mikolongwe in the Southern Region.

The functions of the Bwemba Centre are to:

1. Maintain pure-bred Friesians to supply raw milk to Malawi Milk Marketing in Lilongwe;

2. Serve as a steaming-up centre for pregnant crossbred heifers from the Likasi Livestock Breeding Station; which are released to smallholder dairy farmers after calving;

3. Produce pure-Friesian steers and to raise crossbred steers for the Likasi breeding station, from where the steers are released to stall-feeder farmers; and to

4. Serve as a demonstration centre for smallholder dairy farmers in all aspects of management.

The movements of cattle between Bwemba and Likasi are depicted in Figure 3.

Management practices

Pregnant crossbred cows from Likasi were put together with pregnant and non-pregnant pure Friesians on their arrival at Bwemba. Cows in the final month of pregnancy were isolated in a partly-roofed pen, where calving took place. Cows were fed concentrate during milking at a rate of I kg concentrate per 2 kg of milk produced. Silage (Rhodes grass/maize/Napier grass) and Rhodes grass hay were fed ad libitum.

Most cows were machine-milked twice daily, but those going to farmers were hand milked. The milk produced by each cow was weighed at each milking.

Calves were suckled by their dams for 48 hours after birth and then separated from their dams. Calves were sent to a calf pen where each received 6 litres of milk per day, 3 litres in the morning and 3 in the afternoon, for a period of 3 to 4 weeks. Calf-ration concentrate was also fed ad libitum. At 20 weeks of age calves that met health standards and body conformation criteria were sent to Likasi where females were reared to join the breeding herd and steers were sold to stall-feeder farmers. Calves that failed to meet the selection criteria were treated for worm infestation and fed to a standard condition before being sent to Likasi for rearing.

Reproductive performance of cows at Chitedze


Age at first calving
Calving interval and days open


Age at first calving

Analysis of variance of age at first calving of Friesian-Malawi Zebu crossbred cows and Friesian cows at Chitedze is shown in Table 16.

Table 16. Analysis of variance of age at first calving at Chitedze, 1969-83.

Source

d.f.

MS x 10-2

Breed group

3

715

Year of birth

9

2 118* *

Season of birth

1

418

Breed x season

3

444

Remainder

63

371

** = P<0.01

Only year of birth of the heifer had a significant effect (P < 0.01) on the age at which the heifer calved for the first time (Table 16).

The mean age at first calving was 42.0 l 6.3 months (CV 15%). The means of age at first calving for heifers born between 1970 and 1974 and between 1975 and 1978 were 40 and 45.5 months, respectively, with a peak of 54.5 months for heifers born in 1977 (Table 17). There was no apparent reason for the observed increase in age at first calving.

Although the effect of breed group on age at first calving was not significant, there was a trend for heifers with a larger proportion of Friesian inheritance to be older at first calving. This suggests that feeding levels at the station were inadequate for both the crossbreds and the pure Friesians.

Figure 3. Movement of crossbred cattle between Likasi and Bwemba.

Table 17. Estimated least squares means for age at first calving at Chitedze, 1969-83.

Variable

Number

Age at first calving (months)

Overall

80

41.7

Breed group

1/2 Friesian

7

33.1

3/4 Friesian

39

42.7

7/8 Friesian

24

45.8

Friesian

10

45.5

Year of birth

1969

5

52.6 a

1970

5

39.7 bjh

1972

7

35.6 cbh

1973

11

38.5 bdg

1974

12

34.9 be

1975

11

42.2 dfj

1976

7

43.1 cgj

1977

4

54.5 a

1978

12

42.2 dhj

1979

6

34.0 b

Season of birth



January-June

37

43.0

July-December

43

40.4

Within variable groups, row means followed by the same letter do not differ significantly (P < 0.05). No letter following indicates that the variable group did not show a significant difference in the analysis of variance.

Calving interval and days open

The mean calving interval and days open for 208 carvings at Chitedze were 468 ± 131 days and 190 ± 129 days, respectively, with CVs of 28 and 68% .

Analyses of variance of calving interval and days open are shown in Table 18.

Year of previous calving and breed group by season of previous calving interaction had significant effects on both calving interval and days open (Table 18). Calving interval was significantly longer in 1977 (543 days) and 1980 (598 days) than in other years (Table 19). The corresponding figures for days open were 268 and 316, respectively. These differences may have been due to residual effects of experimental treatments imposed on the cows, but the possibility of nutritional stress due to climatic effects in these years cannot be ruled out.

The breed group by season of calving interaction indicates that Friesians that had calved previously between January and June calved again 143 days later than those that calved previously between July and December. This trend was also observed for the 1/2-Friesian-1/2-Zebu crosses, but the difference was only 42 days. Cows that calved in January through June were exposed longer to the period of feed shortage (May through October) after calving than were cows that calved in July through December. The magnitudes of the differences also indicate that cows with more Friesian inheritance were more vulnerable than those with less Friesian blood. This is also supported by the estimated least squares means of 407, 484 and 513 days calving interval for the 1/2-, 3/4- and 7/8-Friesian cows, respectively, though the differences were not statistically significant.

Table 18. Analyses of variance of calving interval and days open at Chitedze, 1972-83.


Source

Calving interval

Days open

d.f.

MS x 10-1

MS x 10-1

Breed group

3

2 672

3 524

Lactation number

5

2 644

2 711

Year of calving

9

5 717**

5 464**

Season

1

2 168

1 313

Breed group x season

3

4 268*

4 552*

Remainder

186

1 679

1 669

* = P<0.05
** = P<0.01

Productive performance of cows at Chitedze


Total lactation yield, lactation length, milk yield per lactation day and dry period
Annual milk yield


Total lactation yield, lactation length, milk yield per lactation day and dry period

The means for total lactation yield, lactation length, milk yield per day and dry period were 2116 ± 602 kg, 330 ± 84 days, 6.5 ± 1.7 kg and 141 ± 114 days, respectively, with corresponding CVs of 28, 25, 26 and 81%.

Analyses of variance of total lactation yield, lactation length, milk yield per lactation day and dry period are presented in Table 20.

Breed group and year of calving had significant effects (P < 0.01) on total lactation yield and yield per lactation day but not on lactation length. Lactation number also had a significant effect (P < 0.05) on yield per lactation day (Table 20).

Table 19. Estimated least squares means for calving interval and days open at Chitedze, 1972-83.

Variable

No.

Calving interval (days)

No.

Days open

Overall

208

476

208

198

Breed group

1/2 Friesian

49

407

49

130

3/4 Friesian

116

484

116

205

7/8 Friesian

17

513

17

235

Friesian

26

498

26

219

Lactation number

1

58

467

59

189

2

54

438

54

166

3

42

465

40

164

4

31

494

32

235

5

15

432

17

176

6+

8

556

6

258

Year of calving

1972

6

434 ab

6

145 a

1973

14

422 a

14

147 a

1974

14

462 ac

14

181 ac

1975

20

489 ac

20

213 ac

1976

19

442 a

22

-181 a

1977

37

543 bc

37

268 bc

1978

23

471 ac

22

188 a

1979

37

475 a

35

194 a

1980

27

598 b

27

316 b

1981

11

419a

11

144a

Season of calving

January-June

79

490

78

209

July - December

129

461

130

186

Within variable groups row means followed by the same letter do not differ significantly (P < 0.05) No letter following indicates that the variable group did not show a significant difference in the analysis of variance.

The total milk yield and yield per lactation day were similar for the 3/4, 7/8 and pure Friesians, and were greater than those of the 1/2 Friesians. Total lactation yield peaked at the fifth lactation, though the yield at this lactation was not significantly different from those of the other lactations except for the first (Table 21).

The significant effect of year of calving on total lactation yield and yield per lactation day was due to the very poor yields in 1977 and 1980, which were about 30% lower than overall mean yields. The significant effect of year on dry period (P < 0.01) also resulted from the unusually long dry periods in 1977 and 1980, which were 59% and 77% longer than the overall mean. There was letter do not differ significantly (P < 0.05). No letter following indicates that the variable group did not show a significant difference in the analysis of variance. no obvious difference in the rainfall patterns in 1977 and 1980 that would explain the deviations from average performance in those years.

Annual milk yield

The mean annual milk yield per cow was 1671 592 kg, with a CV of 35%.

Analysis of variance of annual milk yield per cow is presented in Table 22.

Breed group, lactation number or parity and year of calving had significant effects (P < 0.01) on annual milk yield (Table 22). The estimated least squares means are laid out in Table 23.

Table 20. Analyses of variance of total lactation milk yield, lactation length, milk yield per day of lactation and dry period at Chitedze, 1972-83.

Source


d.f.

Lact. yield

Lact. length

Yield/day


d.f.

Dry period

MS x 103

MS x 10-2

MS x 10-2

MS x 10-2

Breed group

3

2 834**

136

1 539**

3

112

Lactation number

5

381

128

725*

5

182

Year of calving

10

3 003**

56

3 019**

9

546**

Season of calving

1

314

21

5.4

1

83

Breed x season

3

341

167

672

3

252**

Remainder

257

354

70

297

182

126

* = P<0.05
** = P<0.01

Table 21. Estimated least squares means for total lactation milk yield, lactation length, milk yield per day of lactation and dry period at Chitedze, 1972-83.

Variable

No.

Lact. Yield (kg)

Lact. Length (days)

Milk yield/day(kg)

No.

Dry period (days)

Overall

280

2 221

331

6.9

204

149

Breed group

1/2 Friesian

52

1 677a

307

5.6a

47

116

3/4 Friesian

151

2 345 b

331

7.1b

115

145

7/8 Friesian

42

2 495 b

365

7.3b

17

157

Friesian

35

2 366 b

321

7.4b

25

179

Lactation number

1

84

2 075 a

356

6.1 a

59

132

2

60

2 157 ab

324

6.7b

53

127

3

50

2 212 ab

318

7.0b

39

131

4

40

2 168 ab

316

6.9b

30

176

5

29

2 398 b

348

7.1b

17

113

6+

17

2 315 ab

325

7.4b

6

217

Year of calving

1972

6

2 511 ae

324

7.9 ae

6

99a

1973

14

2 383 ae

336

7.4 ae

14

107 a

1974

14

2 497 ae

345

7.5 ae

14

132a

1975

19

2 449 ae

349

7.2 ae

19

146 ae

1976

23

2 145 ae

341

6.4a

20

124 ae

1977

38

1 544 bc

321

5.1 bc

37

228 b

1978

26

2 093 e

326

6.6a

22

133 ad

1979

38

2 165 ef

345

6.7a

34

142 ad

1980

37

1 681 c

388

5.1c

27

265 c

1981

20

2 489 af

317

7.8e

11

117 ade

1982

45

2 470a

300

8.1e

-

-

Season of calving

January-June

98

2 264

335

- 6.9

76

158

July-December

182

2 177

327

6.8

128

140

Within variable groups, row means followed by the same letter do not differ significantly (P < 0.05). No letter following indicates that the variable group did not show a significant difference in the analysis of variance.

Table 22. Analysis of variance of annual milk yield per cow at Chitedze, 1972-83.

Source

d.f.

MS x10-3

Breed group

3

2 131 * *

Lactation number

5

1 104**

Year of calving

9

3 393**

Season of calving

1

32

Season x breed

3

169

Remainder

189

350

** = P<0.01

Table 23. Estimated least squares means for annual milk yield per cow at Chitedze, 1972-83.

Variable

No.

Annual milk yield (kg)

Overall

211

1 852

Breed group

1/2 Friesian

51

1 383a

3/4 Friesian

117

1 995 b

7/8 Friesian

17

1 959 b

Friesian

26

2 071 b

Lactation number

1

59

1 582a

2

54

1 870 bf

3

42

1 952 bf

4

31

1 949 bf

5

17

2 148 ef

6+

8

1 610 ab

Year of calving

1972

6

2 534a

1973

14

2 375 a

1974

14

2 221 ag

1975

20

2 126 ahj

1976

22

1 804 dgh

1977

37

1 092 c

1978

23

1 743 dj

1979

37

1 689 d

1980

27

1 001 f

1981

11

1 935 adh

Season of calving

January-June

80

1 834

July-December

131

1 870

Within variable groups, row means followed by the same letter do not differ significantly (P < 0.05). No letter following indicates that the variable group did not show a significant difference in the analysis of variance.

The pattern of influence exerted by breed group, lactation number and year of calving on annual milk yield per cow was similar to that observed for total lactation yield and yield per lactation day. Productivity was again lowest in 1977 and 1980.

Reproductive performance of cows at Bwemba


Age at first calving
Calving interval and days open


Age at first calving

The mean age at first calving for 145 crossbred heifers born at Bwemba was 36.8 ± 6.6 months, with a CV of 18%. None of the factors studied (breed group, year and month of birth and breed group x month of birth interaction) had a significant effect on age at first calving. The estimated least squares means for age at first calving are laid out in Table 24.

Calving interval and days open

The mean calving interval and days open for 338 carvings at Bwemba were 407 ± 90 days and 129 ± 93 days, respectively.

Breed group, month of previous calving and breed group by month interaction showed significant effects (P < 0.01) on calving interval (Table 25) and breed group (P < 0.01) and breed by month of calving had significant effects (P<0.05) on days open. Lactation number or parity and year of calving did not show any significant effect on days open and calving interval. The estimated least squares means for calving interval and days open are laid out in Table 26.

There is an apparent pattern in the length of calving interval (Table 26), in which cows that calved previously in December through March had the longest calving intervals and those that calved previously in April through July had the shortest calving intervals: the calving intervals of cows that calved previously in September through November were of intermediate duration. This pattern appears to be contrary to that which would be expected from the rainfall pattern, and hence the availability of green feed, but follows the pattern of availability of supplementary feed.

Table 24. Estimated least squares means for age at first calving at Bwemba, 1971-83.

Variable

Number

Age at first calving (months)

Overall

145

37.7

Breed group

7/8 Friesian

37 0

15/16 Friesian

47

37.2

31/32 Friesian

29

39.5

Friesian

30

36.9

Year of birth

1971

5

38.5

1972

6

40.1

1973

15

40.2

1974

13

36.6

1975

17

33.9

1976

15

37.6

1977

18

38.2

1978

30

32.7

1979

18

38.5

1980

8

40.3

Month of birth

January

7

39.3

February

14

41.4

March

21

41.5

April

16

38.5

May

9

38.5

June

7

40.1

July

7

35.8

August

13

35.5

September

15

36.5

October

19

35.9

November

5

37.2

December

12

32.0

Productive performance of cows at Bwemba


Total lactation yield, lactation length, milk yield per lactation day and dry period


Total lactation yield, lactation length, milk yield per lactation day and dry period

The means for total lactation yield, lactation length, milk yield per lactation day and dry period were 2492 ± 772 kg, 294 ± 103 days, 8.8 ± 2.6 kg and 116 ± 136 days, respectively, with corresponding CVs of 31,35,30 and 118%.

Analyses of variance of the four traits are presented in Table 27.

Year of calving had significant effects (P < 0.01) on total lactation yield, lactation length and yield per lactation day, and lactation number had a significant effect (P < 0.01) on lactation yield (Table 27). None of the factors studied had a significant effect on dry period.

The estimated least squares means for the four traits are laid out in Table 28.

Total milk yield increased from lactation one through five after which it fell. Total lactation yield and yield per lactation day were highest in 1977 and 1979 and were lowest in 1981.

Dairy productivity: The mean annual milk yield per cow was 2405 ± 802 kg, with a CV of 33%.

Analysis of variance of annual milk yield per cow is shown in Table 29.

Lactation number or parity and year of calving showed highly significant effects (P < 0.01) on annual milk yield per cow. Month of calving and breed group were not significant.

The estimated least squares means for annual milk yield are presented in Table 30.

Table 25. Analyses of variance of calving interval and days open at Bwemba, 1974-83.


Source

Calving interval

Days open

d.f.

MS x 10-1

d.f.

MS x 10-1

Breed group

3

5 786**

3

2 744**

Lactation number

5

325

5

384

Year of calving

8

1 197

8

1 424

Month of calving

11

2 580**

11

1 435

Breed x month

27

1 673**

28

1 319*

Remainder

283

826

283

860

* = P<0.05
** = P<0.01

Table 26. Estimated least squares means for calving interval and days open at Bwemba, 1974-83.

Variable

No.

Calving interval (days)

No.

Days open

Overall

338

431

339

146

Breed group

7/8 Friesian

45

414 a

45

124 a

15/16 Friesian

200

392a

200

116a

31/32 Friesian

30

502 b

30

203 b

Friesian

63

419 a

64

140 a

Lactation number

1

109

438

109

155

2

81

436

79

151

54

443

57

152


4

40

429

39

153

5

25

412

26

124

6 +

29

430

29

138

Year of calving

1974

11

456

11

168

1975

21

466

21

180

1976

29

419

29

132

1977

54

421

53

136

1978

49

398

49

110

1979

37

417

38

129

1980

48

446

47

155

1981

43

439

44

166

1982

46

423

46

135

Month of calving

January

26

488 acd

26

174

February

44

454 ad

.44

175

March

39

519 a

41

198

April

31

375 be

32

98

May

25

393 bc

25

117

June

20

434 abc

20

150

July

12

386 ce

12

102

August

35

434 cd

35

154

September

36

407 ce

36

126

October

32

445 cd

31

168

November

19

395 cd

18

116

December

19

447 ce

19

167

Within variable groups, row means followed by the same letter do not differ significantly (P < 0.05). No letter following indicates that the variable group did not show a significant difference in the analysis of variance.

Table 27. Analyses of variance of total lactation milk yield, lactation length, milk yield per day of lactation and dry period at Bwemba, 1977-83.

Source


d.f.

Lact. yield

Lact. length

Yield/day


d.f.

Dry period

MS x 10-3

MS x 10-1

MS x 10²

MS x 1-1

Breed group

3

1 006

839

152

3

1 638

Lactation number

5

3 651**

1 240

5 625

5

1 983

Year of calving

5

6 502**

3 105**

5 068**

5

4 041

Month of calving

11

588

1 659

754

11

1 247

Breed x month

31

625

1 305

485

29

2 027

Remainder

265

594

1 052

674

209

1 906

** = P<0.01

Table 28. Estimated least squares means for total lactation milk yield, lactation length, milk yield per day of lactation and dry period at Bwemba, 1977-83.

Variable

No.

Lact. Yield (kg)

Lact. Length (days)

Milk yield/day (kg)

No.

Dry period (days)

Overall

321

2 659

293

9.3

263

112

Breed group

7/8 Friesian

44

2 641

280

9.4

35

79

15/16 Friesian

187

2 484

283

9.1

151

105

31/32 Friesian

33

2 720

320

9.4

27

132

Friesian

62

2 790

290

9.5

50

133

Lactation number

1

95

2 174a

317a

7.4a

78

149

2

72

2 443 b

276b

8.8b

59

113

3

49

2 838 cd

282 ab

10.2 cd

45

108

4

39

2 833 df

301 ab

9.8 cd

34

131

5

27

2 872 de

291 ab

10.3 ed

20

78

6+

39

2 791 cfe

294 ab

9.5 ce

27

95

Year of calving

1977

56

3 290a

331a

10.2a

48

66

1978

56

2 413 be

283 bc

8.6 bc

47

75

1979

47

2 956 c

288 abd

10.7 a

38

102

1980

80

2 617 bd

255 cd

10.1a

47

144

1981

46

2 202 e

302 ab

7.9c

39

152

1982

55

2 474 de

302 ab

8.4 cd

44

134

Month of calving

January

30

2 755

271

10.1

19

96

February

38

2 908

298

9.8

36

121

March

36

2 671

355

8.4

32

61

April

30

2 689

280

9.6

27

91

May

16

2 758

285

9.8

15

121

June

19

2 300

254

9.4

13

144

July

11

2 741

291

9.3

9

83

August

30

2 609

313

8.4

28

105

September

34

2 394

349

8.2

26

179

October

31

2 972

307

9.7

25

123

November

22

2 630

266

9.4

16

101

December

24

2 478

253

9.5

17

122

Within variable groups, row means followed by the same letter do not differ significantly (P < 0.05). No letter following indicates that the variable group did not show a significant difference in the analysis of variance.

Table 29. Analysis of variance of annual milk yield per cow at Bwemba, 1974-83.

Source

d.f.

MS x 10-3

Breed group

3

1 304

Lactation number

5

3 634**

Year of calving

8

3 906**

Month of calving

11

698

Breed x month

28

737

Remainder

251

644

** = P<0.01

Table 30. Estimated least squares means for annual milk yield per cow at Bwemba, 1974-83.

Variable

No.

Annual milk yield (kg)

Overall

307

2 580

Breed group

7/8 Friesian

43

2 581

15/16 Friesian

176

2 647

31/32 Friesian

26

2 471

Friesian

62

2 620

Lactation number

1

94

2 142a

2

66

2 404a

3

51

2 742 be

4

37

2 787 cde

5

26

2 983 bd

6+

33

2 419 ae

Year of calving

1974

7

2 884 ace

1975

9

2 905 ae

1976

14

2 708 ace

1977

51

2 950 ad

1978

53

2 207 cf

1979

38

2 930a

1980

49

2 410 def

1981

41

1 945 bc

1982

45

2 276 bef

Month of calving

January

25

2 653

February

40

2 536

March

34

2 279

April

32

2 782

May

19

2 851

June

16

2 324

July

11

2 782

August

30

2 313

September

30

2 371

October

29

2 835

November

20

2 789

December

21

2 439

Within variable groups row means followed by the same letter do not differ significantly (P < 0.05). No letter following indicates that the variable group did not show a significant difference in the analysis of variance.


Previous Page Top of Page Next Page