This appendix provides details of:
(i) the simple demand projections;
(ii) the estimation of the supply increases sufficient to match the projected needs; and
(iii) the decomposition of the growth in supply into its components.
(i) Demand Projections
These were based on the following assumptions:
(a) that the price of rice was to remain constant in real terms;(b) that there would be no inter-regional trade in rice; i.e., the projected needs would be met from supplies within the region, including the possibility of intraregional trade. The rates and projections by regions are given in Table 3.4.
(ii) Supply Increases
Much of the increase in output will have to come from higher yields, although some allowance was made for growth in area in some regions. The basic assumptions about the yield ceilings and yield gaps are set out in Appendix Table C. 1. The attained yields projected for 2030 are those, which together with increase in area sown and/or cropping intensity, would generate sufficient additional rice to meet the projected demands. A summary of the indicative increases is given in Appendix Table C.2.
(iii) Sources of Growth
The total output increase in each region and ecosystem was decomposed into three parts. Firstly the amount attributable to increased area and/or cropping intensity was estimated. The balance of the required output then had to come from increased yields. The yield component was further disaggregated into (a) that due to a reduction in the yield gap assuming the existing yield ceiling; and (b) that due to an increase in the yield ceiling itself. Summaries of the results follow in Tables C.3 to C.4.
Table C.1: Yield Ceilings and Gaps: Assumptions for 1986-88 and 2030
|
Region/ Ecosystem |
1986-88 |
2030 |
|||||||
|
Actual Yield |
Ceiling |
Gap |
Ceiling |
Gap |
Attained |
||||
|
t/ha. |
t/ha. |
As a % of Actual Yield |
t/ha. |
% |
t/ha. |
% |
t/ha. |
||
|
Asia |
IRR |
4.5 |
9.5 |
48 |
5.0 |
52 |
13.0 |
35 |
8.5 |
|
RFL |
2.2 |
7.0 |
32 |
4.8 |
68 |
9.0 |
53 |
4.2 |
|
|
UPL |
1.3 |
4.5 |
29 |
3.2 |
71 |
6.0 |
59 |
2.5 |
|
|
DWT |
1.5 |
5.0 |
30 |
5.3 |
70 |
7.0 |
60 |
2.8 |
|
|
China |
IRR |
5.3 |
10.5 |
51 |
5.2 |
49 |
13.0 |
25 |
9.8 |
|
SSA |
IRR |
2.1 |
8.0 |
26 |
5.9 |
74 |
12.0 |
33 |
8.0 |
|
RFL |
1.7 |
6.0 |
28 |
4.3 |
73 |
8.5 |
53 |
4.5 |
|
|
UPL |
1.2 |
4.3 |
29 |
3.1 |
71 |
5.5 |
64 |
2.0 |
|
|
DWT |
1.1 |
4.0 |
21 |
2.9 |
74 |
6.0 |
50 |
3.0 |
|
|
LAC |
IRR |
4.0 |
9.5 |
42 |
4.5 |
58 |
13.0 |
35 |
8.5 |
|
RFL |
2.5 |
7.0 |
36 |
4.5 |
64 |
8.0 |
53 |
3.4 |
|
|
UPL |
1.2 |
4.5 |
27 |
3.3 |
73 |
5.0 |
60 |
2.0 |
|
|
DWT |
1.2 |
5.0 |
23 |
3.8 |
77 |
7.0 |
71 |
2.0 |
|
|
WANA |
IRR |
5.7 |
10.0 |
57 |
4.3 |
43 |
14.0 |
15 |
11.9 |
Table C.2: Level and Distribution of Indicative Output Increases By Region and Ecosystem
|
Region |
Ecosystem |
Increases in Outputa from 1986-88 to 2030 mt |
Distribution of Increased Output % |
|
Asia (excl. China) |
IRR |
160.4 |
29.9 |
|
RFL |
103.5 |
19.3 |
|
|
UPL |
22.9 |
4.3 |
|
|
DWT |
15.1 |
2.8 |
|
|
Sub-total |
301.9 |
56.3 |
|
|
China |
IRR |
187.6 |
35.0 |
|
SSA |
IRR |
8.0 |
1.5 |
|
RFL |
6.3 |
1.2 |
|
|
UPL |
5.8 |
1.1 |
|
|
DWT |
0.3 |
0.1 |
|
|
Sub-total |
20.4 |
3.8 |
|
|
LAC |
IRR |
13.9 |
2.6 |
|
RFL |
1.5 |
0.3 |
|
|
UPL |
4.8 |
0.9 |
|
|
DWT |
0.1 |
0.0 |
|
|
Sub-total |
20.4 |
3.8 |
|
|
WANA |
IRR |
5.7 |
1.1 |
|
TOTAL |
535.9 |
100.0 |
|
a Needed to meet the projected level of rice demand.
Table C.3: Sources of Output Growth By Region and Ecosystem
|
Region |
Ecosystem |
Sources and Output Growth |
||||
|
Reduce the Yield Gap |
Raise the Yield Ceiling |
Additional Area Harvested |
Interaction Effect |
Total |
||
|
Asia (excl. China) |
IRR |
49.9 |
68.9 |
22.2 |
19.3 |
160.4 |
|
RFL |
39.4 |
34.8 |
15.4 |
13.9 |
103.5 |
|
|
UPL |
9.0 |
10.2 |
1.9 |
1.7 |
22.9 |
|
|
DWT |
5.8 |
9.3 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
15.1 |
|
|
China |
Total |
82.5 |
61.2 |
24.0 |
19.5 |
187.6 |
|
SSA |
IRR |
3.3 |
2.7 |
0.5 |
1.4 |
8.0 |
|
RFL |
1.4 |
1.4 |
1.4 |
2.0 |
6.3 |
|
|
UPL |
0.9 |
1.2 |
2.4 |
1.4 |
5.8 |
|
|
DWT |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.3 |
|
|
LAC |
IRR |
5.8 |
6.1 |
1.0 |
1.1 |
13.9 |
|
RFL |
0.7 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
1.5 |
|
|
UPL |
2.4 |
0.8 |
1.0 |
0.6 |
4.8 |
|
|
DWT |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
|
|
WANA |
Total |
2.4 |
2.9 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
5.7 |
Table C.4a: Sources of Output Growth Within Ecosystems
|
Ecosystem |
Reduce the Yield Gap |
Raise the Yield Ceiling |
Increase Area Harvested |
Interaction |
Total |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
|
IRR |
38 |
38 |
13 |
11 |
100 |
|
RFL |
37 |
33 |
15 |
14 |
100 |
|
UPL |
37 |
37 |
16 |
11 |
100 |
|
DWT |
39 |
61 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
|
Total |
38 |
37 |
13 |
12 |
100 |
Table C.4b: Sources of Output Growth Within Regions
|
Region |
Reduce the Yield Gap |
Raise the Yield Ceiling |
Increase Area Harvested |
Interaction |
Total |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
|
Asia (excl. China) |
34 |
41 |
13 |
12 |
100 |
|
China |
44 |
33 |
13 |
11 |
100 |
|
SSA |
28 |
27 |
21 |
24 |
100 |
|
LAC |
43 |
37 |
11 |
9 |
100 |
|
WANA |
42 |
51 |
4 |
4 |
100 |
|
Total |
38 |
37 |
13 |
12 |
100 |