Bokelmann, W. 2001. Perspektiven des Gartenbaus in einem internationalen markt. In Agrarwirtschaft, Vol. 50, no. 5. (Perspectives for Horticulture in an International Market).
Commission of the European Communities. 1990. Generalized system of preferences: guidelines for the 1990s. Com (90) 329 final. Brussels, Belgium, July 1990.
Commission of the European Communities. 2001. Proposal for a Council Regulation applying a scheme of generalized tariff preferences for the period 1. January 2002 to 31 December 2004 by the Commission. COM (2001) 293 final. Brussels, Belgium, June 2001.
Davenport, M. 1994. Possible improvements to the generalized system of preferences. UNCTAD/ITD/8. Geneva, Switzerland, April 1994.
De Albuquerque, D. & Braga Nonnenberg, M.J. 1997. MERCOSUL: Integração de productos Agrícolas. Brasilia, Brazil, IPEA.
Dolan, C. & Humphrey, J. 2000. Governance and trade in fresh vegetables: the impact of United Kingdom supermarkets on the African horticulture industry. In The Journal for Development Studies, Vol.37, Nr.2. December 2000.
ECOSOC. 2000. The post-Uruguay Round tariff environment for developing country exports: tariff peaks and tariff escalation. Prepared jointly by UNCTAD and WTO (see also TD/B/COM.1/14, Rev.1 on the Internet), January 2000.
ESCAP. 1992. GSP graduation, international trade, and investment in the Asia and Pacific Region. New York, USA, United Nations.
European Commission. 1997. Guidelines for the negotiations of new cooperation agreements with the African, Caribbean and Pacific countries. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. Brussels, Belgium.
European Commission:. 1999. Analysis of trends in the Lomé trade regime and the consequences of retaining it. Brussels, Belgium, April 1999.
FAO. 1999a.The Impact of Banana Supply and Demand Changes on Income, Employment and Food Security. Committee on Commodity Problems, Intergovernmental Group of Bananas and Tropical Fruits, First Session, CCP: BA/TF 99/6. Rome, March 1999.
FAO. 1999b. Economic viability of marine capture fisheries: findings of a global study and an interregional workshop. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 377. Rome, 1999.
FAO. 2000a. Medium-term prospects for agricultural commodities- projections to the year 2005. Rome, 2000.
FAO. 2000b. Agriculture, trade and food security: issues and options in the WTO negotiations from the perspective of developing counties. Report and papers of an FAO symposium held at Geneva, Switzerland. 23-24 September 1999; Rome, 2000.
FAO. 2000c: World meat situation in 1999 and outlook for 2000. Rome.
FAO. 2001a. Contribution of bananas to income, employment and food security in Ghana and Ecuador. Committee on Commodity Problems, Intergovernmental Group of Bananas and Tropical Fruits, Second Session, CCP: BA/TF 01/4. Rome, September 2001.
FAO. 2001b. Commodity Market Review 1999-2000. Rome, 2001.
FAO. 2001c. World markets for organic fruit and vegetables. Rome, 2001.
Fritsch, W. The benefits to Brazil of the generalized system of preferences.UNCTAD/ITP/6 Geneva, Switzerland, February 1989.
Harzig, J. 2001.Fruit and vegetables and nutritional issues. TECHNOFRUITS 2001. Professional Meeting of CIRAD. In FRuiTROP. November 2001.
International Trade Centre-UNCTAD/WTO. 1997. Cut flowers: a study of major markets. Product and Market Development Series. Geneva, Switzerland.
International Trade Centre-UNCTAD/WTO. 2001. Cocoa: guide on commercial practices. Product and Market Development Series, ITC/P67.S/PMD/MDS/00-XII. Geneva, Switzerland.
International Trade Centre, Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2001. World markets for organic fruit and vegetables- opportunities for developing countries in the production and export of organic horticultural products. Rome, FAO.
Kaplan, D. & Kaplinsky, R. 1999.”Trade and industrial policy on an uneven playing field: the case of the deciduous fruit canning industry in South Africa. In World Development, Vol. 27, No. 10. October 1999.
Kaplinsky, R. 2000.Globalisation and unequalisation: what can be learned from the value chain analysis? In The Journal for Development Studies, Vol.37, Nr.2. December 2000.
Langhammer R. J. & Sapir, A. 1987. Economic impact of generalized tariff preferences. Thames Essay No 49.. London, England, Trade Policy Research Centre.
Lery, J.M., Prado, J. & Tietze, U. 1999. Economic viability of marine capture fisheries. Findings of a global study and an interregional workshop held in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 15 -18 December 1997. Fisheries Technical Paper No. 377. Rome, FAO.
MacPhee, C. R. 1989. A synthesis of the GSP programme. UNCTAD/ITP/19. Geneva, Switzerland, December 1989.
MacPhee, C. R. & Oguledo, V. 1994. Losses of tariff preferences and the export performance of less-developed countries. In Journal of International Development, Vol.5, No.2.
McQueen, M. 1999.The impact studies on the effects of REPAs between the ACP and EU. ECDPM Discussion Paper No.3. Maastricht, Holland, March 1999.
Mataya, C. & Tsonga, E. 2001. Economic aspects of development of agricultural alternatives to tobacco production and export marketing in Malawi. In Analytical Studies on Trade, Environment and Development. No. 7. UNCTAD/ITCD/TED/7, United Nations, New York and Geneva, Switzerland.
Meyanathan, S. 1989. Effects of the generalized system of preferences on Malaysia. UNCTAD/ITP/20. Geneva, Switzerland, December 1989.
Murray, T. 1980. Evaluation of the trade benefits under the United States scheme of generalized preferences. UNCTAD Document TD/B/C.5/66. Geneva, Switzerland, February 1980.
OECD. 1995. Trade preferences for developing countries: how much are they worth and for whom? TD/TC/WP (95) 22. Paris, France, March 1995.
OXFAM (Great Britain). 2001. Bitter coffee: how the poor are paying for the slump in coffee prices. London, England.
Peers, S. 1995. Reform of the European Community’s generalized system of preferences: a missed opportunity. In Journal of World Trade, Vol.29, Nr.6. December 1995.
Pyo, H. K. 1989. Effects of the generalized system of preferences on the Republic of Korea. UNCTAD/ITP/18. Geneva, Switzerland, October 1989.
Ruf, F. 2000. Planteurs et chocolatiers, face à face. In Marchés Tropicaux. 1 December 2000.
SGS- Société Générale de Surveillance S.A. 1998.International Market Access Information. Horticulture Sector. UNCTAD/ITDC/COM/Misc.32. New York, USA and Geneva, Switzerland, United Nations,
Sharma, R. 1997. The impact of the Marrakech Agreement on trade of agricultural products of ACP countries. Rome, FAO.
Stevens, C., McQueen, M. & Kennan, J. 1998. After Lomé IV: a strategy for ACP-EU relations in the 21st century. In Institute of Development Studies and Commonwealth Secretariat. December 1998.
Sumner, D. 2002.Implications of the new U.S. Farm Bill for international trade prospects, food security and less developed countries. Rome, FAO. (Unpublished draft.)
Supper, E. 2001. Is there effectively a level playing field for developing country exports? Policy Issues in International Trade and Commodities Series, Study No.1. New York, USA and Geneva, Switzerland, United Nations/UNCTAD
Tangermann, S. 2000.The Cotonou Agreement and the value of preferences in agricultural markets for the African ACP. Geneva, Switzerland, UNCTAD.
Tangermann, S. 2002. The future of preferential trade arrangements for developing countries and the current round of WTO negotiations on agriculture. Rome, FAO.
Tangermann, S. & Josling, T. 1999. The interests of developing countries in the next round of WTO agricultural negotiations. Geneva, Switzerland, UNCTAD.
UNCTAD. 1988. Eleventh general report on the implementation of the generalized system of preferences. TD/B/C.5/111 and Add.1 containing the Report of the Symposium on the generalized system of preferences organized by UNCTAD and ESCAP in October 1987, Geneva, Switzerland. February 1988.
UNCTAD. 1989. The generalized system of preferences: a review of changes in the schemes since their inception. UNCTAD/ITP/14. Geneva, Switzerland.
UNCTAD. 1999a. Way and means of enhancing the utilization of trade preferences by developing countries, in particular LDCs, as well as further ways of expanding preferences. Report by the UNCTAD Secretariat. TD/B/COM.1/20 and Add.1. Geneva, Switzerland, July 1998.
UNCTAD. 1999b. Quantifying the benefits obtained by developing countries from the generalized system of preferences. UNCTAD/ITCD/TSB/Misc.52. October 1999.
UNCTAD. 2001a. Handbook of Statistics 2001 (and previous issues). TD/STAT.25. New York, USA and Geneva, Switzerland, United Nations.
UNCTAD. 2001b. Improving market access for least developed countries. UNCTAD/DITC/TNCD/4. Geneva, Switzerland, May 2001.
UNCTAD. 2001c. Trade Analysis and Information System (TRAINS) UNCTAD/DITC. 1994-2001. (available on diskettes.)
UNCTAD. 2002. Commodity Price Bulletin, Monthly and Annual Price Series. TD/B/CN.1/CPB, May 2002 (and previous issues).
UNCTAD and Commonwealth Secretariat Joint Study. 2001. Duty and quota-free market access for LDCs: an analysis of quad initiatives. UNCTAD/DITC/TAB/Misc.7, London, England and Geneva, Switzerland.
UNIDO. 1997a. Agro- related industrial development in Africa: enhancing capacity building and competitiveness based on potential comparative advantages. Vienna, Austria.
UNIDO. 1997b. Avenues of portfolio investment opportunities in agro-related industries of LDCs. Vienna, Austria.
UNIDO & DESA. 2000. 1998 Industrial Commodity Statistics, Yearbook. New York, USA.
USITC. 2002. Interactive Tariff and Trade Data Web.
Waer, P. & Driessen, B. 1995. The New European Union generalised system of preferences- A workable compromise in the EU- but a better deal for developing countries? In Journal of World Trade. Vol. 29, Nr.4, August. 1995.
World Bank. 2001.World development indicators 2001.Washington, USA.
WTO. 1998. The Fourth ACP-EC Convention of Lomé. Report of the Parties to the Convention under the Decision of 14 October 1996. WT/L/286 and Annex on Trade Aspects of the EU- ACP extension of the Lomé Waiver by the European Commission. Geneva, Switzerland. November 1998.
WTO. 2001. GSP treatment of agricultural products. Committee of Agriculture, Special Session, G/AG/NG/S/23. WTO Secretariat, May 2001.
Yamazaki, F. 1996. Potential erosion of trade preferences in agricultural products. In Food Policy, Vol. 21, pp.409-418.
Yamazawa, I. 1988. Effects of the generalized system of preferences on Japan’s imports from developing countries. UNCTAD/ST/MD/31. Geneva, Switzerland.
Yeats, A.1994. What are OECD trade preferences worth to sub-Saharan Africa? Policy Research Paper No.1254. Washington, USA, World Bank.
ZMP. 2001a. Marktbilanz 2001- Gemüse: Deutschland, Europäische Union, Weltmarkt. Zentrale Markt- und Preisberichtsstelle GmbH. Bonn, Germany. (Market balance for vegetables in Germany, the European Union and on the World market)
ZMP. 2001b. Marktbilanz 2001- Obst: Deutschland, Europäische Union, Weltmarkt. Zentrale Markt- und Preisberichtsstelle GmbH. Bonn, Germany. (Market balance for vegetables in Germany, the European Union and on the world market.)
