Case studies of ten irrigation schemes


Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Sub-Regional Office for East and Southern Africa (SAFR)
Harare, 2000

The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries

ISBN 0-7974-2083-5

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner

© FAO SAFR 2000

Smallholder irrigation development has shown throughout the developing world that it can be used as a key drought mitigation measure and as a vehicle for the long-term agricultural and macro-economic development of a country. Successful smallholder irrigation schemes can result in increased productivity, improved incomes and nutrition, employment creation, food security and drought relief savings for the government. However, socio-economic evaluations of smallholder irrigation schemes are needed at regular intervals in order to be able to derive lessons from past experiences and also help policy makers in formulating sound policies for future development.

This study, carried out in Zimbabwe, is an attempt to contribute to a better understanding of the smallholder irrigation sub-sector by evaluating the socio-economic impact of ten selected smallholder irrigation schemes. Five of the selected schemes were known as being successful and five as being problematic. This report summarizes the methodology and procedures used during the evaluation, the findings, conclusions and recommendations.

The impact assessment and evaluation of the irrigation schemes was carried out through Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA), covering farmers, key institutions and local authorities. The study reveals that, whilst some smallholder irrigation schemes can perform well others can actually perform badly. Factors, which determine the performance, include planning, group cohesion, institutional support, strength of the Irrigation Management Committee (IMC), choice of crops, appropriateness of the technical design and commitment of the farmers.


List of tables

List of figures