Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


Adaptation of forage and browse legumes to the semi-arid mid-altitude regions of Kenya - An interim report

L.K. Menin and D.M. Njarui

National Dryland Farming Research Centre, Katumani
P.O. Box 340, Machakos, Kenya

W.M. Beattie, B.A. Keating and R.K. Jones

ACIAR/CSIRO Dryland Project
P.O. Box 41567, Nairobi, Kenya


Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Discussion
Acknowledgements
References
Appendix 1. Legume-evaluation: Accession list.

Abstract

The adaptation of 160 legumes of various growth forms is being studied at four sites in the semi-arid, mid-altitude districts of Machakos and Kitui in Kenya. The sites cover an altitude range from 900 to 1600 m and mean annual rainfall range from 600 to 1000 mm. Establishment is by direct-seeding using a minimum tillage approach. Phenological characters, susceptibility to pests and diseases, and growth vigour are measured monthly, and dry-matter production annually in row-plot experiments. Seasonal yields of dry matter and nitrogen are also measured in companion sward experiments using a "best bet" sub-set of the collection.

A number of legumes which are well-adapted to the environments have been identified after three growing seasons and appear to have potential for a variety of uses in the local farming systems.

Introduction

Agriculture in the semi-arid midland regions of eastern Kenya is characterised by very low capital inputs, low outputs (even in good seasons) and a high frequency of seasons in which production of staple foods is insufficient for local needs. Rapid increases in rural population densities and in the intensity of cultivation, fuelwood harvesting and grazing have resulted in alarming rates of soil fertility depletion and soil erosion. While rainfall is the principal limiting resource, it is usually closely followed by soil fertility, hence the need to examine the role of legumes in the cereal-based farming systems of the regions as an alternative to the use of expensive nitrogen fertilizers.

FAO/GK/NORAD projects since 1974 (Wilson, 1976; Van Soest, 1986; Ibrahim, 1981; Chabeda, 1976) have made extensive collections of forage legumes within Kenya and evaluated them at four sites - Kitale, Kiboko, Katumani and Mtwapa along with some introduced material. However, much of the evaluation work is unpublished or is of a semi-quantitative nature, and the full potential of forage and browse legumes in Kenya's bimodal semi arid areas remains little understood. In addition, many new species and accessions have become available from more recent plant collecting and evaluation activities in other parts of the world, and this material required testing in Kenya.

The objectives of the research programme reported here are:

1. to assemble an extensive seed collection of forage and browse species with potential adaptation to semi-arid areas of Kenya,

2. to assess the adaptation of this material in a series of experiments to a range of climatic conditions in the districts of Machakos and Kitui,

3. to select a nucleus of widely-adapted legumes that might fit into the varied farming systems in these districts, and to assist agronomists and animal production scientists in further evaluating this material in "on-farm" experimentation.

The work involves close collaboration between staff of the Kenya Government's Ministry of Agriculture and staff of the Australian Dryland Farming Project (ACIAR Project 8326) which is being implemented by the CSIRO Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures.

Materials and methods

Legumes

A total of 167 accessions from 23 genera are under evaluation. Details of ecotypes/species, Commonwealth of Australia Plant Introduction numbers, Kenya Introduction numbers, origin (where known) and project sites planted are contained in Appendix 1.

Field sites

The experiments were undertaken at four fenced sites as follows:

1. Katumani NDFRS, altitude 1600 m, mean annual rainfall 717 mm, mean annual temperature 19.6°C, soil type: chromic luvisol, pH 6.5.

2. Kiboko RRS, 975 m, rf 595 mm, mean temperature 25.7°C, rhodic Feralsol, pH 5.8.

3. Mua Hills, 1650 m, rf 1179 mm, estimated mean temperature 19.0°C, red sandy earth, pH 7.0.

4. Ithookwe (Kitui), 1160 m, rf 1080 mm, mean temperature 22.5°C, red sandy earth, pH 5.8.

Experimental Design and Layout

Row plot experiment. The experiments were laid in a randomised complete block design with 104 accessions and 3 replicates. Plots are 6.75 m² and consist of two rows each 2.25 m long and rows 1.5 m apart. Replicates run along the contour. One of each pair of rows received a single dressing of a basal fertilizer. The other row was unfertilized.

Sward experiments. For each season of planting, the experiments were arranged as randomised blocks with 20 accessions and three replicates. Individual plots were 16 m². Seed was not broadcast over the entire plot but distributed along disturbed rows 0.5 m apart. All plots received a basal fertilizer dressing at establishment.

Seed Preparation

Row plot experiments. Seed viability was determined by germinating scarified seed on moist filter pads in petri dishes. Approximately 50% of all seeds/plot were scarified by sandpaper or scalpel. Inoculation with the requisite rhizobia in a gum arable/distilled water solution was made a few days prior to planting. Inoculated seed was kept under refrigeration.

Sward experiments. Seed preparation was similar to that for row plots except that 100% seed scarification was attempted, and the seeding rate was adjusted to give similar numbers of viable seeds per plot (Table 2).

Land Preparation, Sowing and Seedling Establishment

Land preparation was minimal except for Ithookwe (site 4) which was ploughed just prior to planting. Vegetation was cut back and burned off during the dry season and line rows pegged out. A small chisel plough attached to a two-wheel Honda mini-tractor marked a 4 cm deep furrow along each planting row. At the onset of rains, when weed seedlings had emerged, the furrows were dusted with Aldrin 2.5% @ 20 kg/ha. Legume seed was then hand-sown, lightly covered and firmed with soil. Two days later or just prior to legume germination the planted rows were sprayed with Roundup herbicide 2 l/ha using a knapsack sprayer fitted with a fan nozzle. Subsequent row weeding was done by hand or with a rope wick containing Roundup.

Data Collection/Harvesting

Row plot experiments (Table 1). Agronomic and phonological characters recorded monthly from the second month after sowing included plant population and development (vegetative, flowering and seeding), height, date of anesthesia, insect and disease incidence and a visual bulk rating on a one-five scale. In early October 1986, after 11 months of uninhibited growth, a measured length of average plant material in each row plot was cut at 5 cm above ground level (5 cm from the crown for trailing legumes), oven dried at 60°C and weighed. Sample weight was converted to yield (kg/ha) by the formula

Sample experiments. Plant measurements similar to those given above were made except that for visual bulk ratings. Harvesting entailed cutting two randomised 1 m² quadrats 5 cm above ground level from each plot three times per year. The first harvest was in late January, 1986 (end of short rains), the second in early June, 1986 (end of long rains) and the third in late September, 1986 (end of dry season). The latter harvest also included measurements of regrowth from the first harvest. Cut material was oven-dried at 60°C, weighed and subsampled for later N analysis.

Fertilizer Applications

Two weeks after legume seedling emergence a basal fertilizer was hand broadcast along one row of the row plots to a width of 1.5 m and evenly broadcast over the swards. Rates in kg/ha were: triple superphosphate 200, muriate of potash 41.7, dolomite 250, manganese sulphate 15, borax, zinc sulphate and copper sulphate 10, respectively and sodium molybdate 0.36. The swards received the same mixture broadcast over the entire plot.

Methodology for Experiments with Leucaena Accessions

At Katumani, a collection of Mexican high altitude Leucaena accessions is being tested quantitatively against a suite of commercial cultivars including cv Cunningham, cv Peru and K8. Adaptation is progressively monitored throughout each year by measuring shoot extension growth relative to soil moisture content and air temperatures. Destructive harvests are made twice and four times per year for wood, stem and leaf yield.

Results

Row Plot Experiments

Data from 16 accessions which performed well at Site 1 (Katumani), Site 2 (Kiboko) or both sites are presented in Table 1. Of the annuals, the short season Macrotyloma africanum with densely twining fine stems, had high resistance to insect and disease, good seed production and an excellent seedling regenerative capacity. Another trailing legume Vigna unguiculata CI60452 was more strongly persistent at both sites than other entries from that genus. Alysicarpus rugosus established well and had the highest edible dry matter (EDM) (1938 kg/ha) at the end of the evaluation period at Site 1. The two Stylosanthes hamata lines, cv Verano and K14363, are morphologically similar, but the latter persisted later into the dry season. Both accessions and the late flowering S. humilis are particularly susceptible to termites. Lablab purpureus cv Rongai grew vigorously at both sites and gave high visual bulk ratings. It flowered profusely, but seed production was reduced by the depredations of flower-eating beetles Mylabris and Coryna sp.

The selected perennial legumes (Table 1) have persisted strongly at Site 1 but only Desmanthus virgatus, S. scabra cv Fitzroy cv Seca and S. guianensis Alupe 'C' survived the, harsher environment at Site 2. These Stylosanthes accessions yielded >4 tonnes EDM/ha at Katumani and appear particularly well adapted at that site. The semi-erect shrub legume Desmanthus virgatus K14456 was slow to establish but showed promise later in the experiment at both sites. Neonotonia wightii was also slow to establish but grew vigorously after the second season. Cassia rotundifolia cv Wynn flowered very early and continued to produce seed throughout the year. It has persisted strongly at Site 1 with useful seasonal seedling regeneration. Desmodium intortum cv Greenleaf is susceptible to termites and while quite vigorous during seasonal rains only just survived the long dry season at Site 1.

Table 1. Field data from 16 selected forage legumes at two sites (Est. 1.11.85).

Accessions

PBR

PBR

Max. ht (cms)

Anesthesis (days)

Seed Production

Pet disease

EDM yield (kg/ha)

Site

Days

Site

Days

Site

Site

Site

Site

Site

Site

1

2

1

2

Site

Site

1


2


1

2

1

2

1

2





1

2

Alysicarpus K14384

3.6

180

3.0

120

30

20

80

140

2

2

0

0

0

0

938

-

Lablab purpureus cv Rongai

4.3

90

5.0

60

55

60

110

200

2

2

2

0

0

0

-

-

Macrotyloma africanum K14348

3.5

90

3.2

90

10

15

55

80

3

2

0

0

0

0

-

-

Stylosanthes hamata cv Verano

5.0

210

4.0

180-

20

25

60

60

3

3

3

0

0

0

678

-

Stylosanthes hamata K14365

4.8

210

4.3

210

15

15

60-

60

3

3

3

1

0

0

820

-

Stylosanthes humilis K14368

4.8

210

4.1

210

10

15

150

170

3

3

2

0

2

0

362

-

Vigna unguiculata CPI 60452

3.2

150

4.0

60

15

25

60

60

2

2

1

0

1

0

-

-

Cassia rotundifolia cv Wynn

5.0

210

3.0

180

20

20

50

30

3

2

1

1

0

0

851

-

Desmanthus virgatus K14456

3.1

300

2.6

180

25

25

120

140

2

2

1

0

0

0

720

-

Desmodium intortum cv Greenleaf

3.5

240

1.6

90

40

15

210

-

2

0

2

0

0

0

1198

-

Neonotonia wightii K2366

4.8

210

3.0

210

30

20

200

210

3

1

1

1

0

0

1551

309

Stylosanthes fruticosa K14426

4.5

210

2.6

270

25

15

110

90

3

2

1

0

0

0

2015

415

Stylosanthes guianensis cv Graham

4.3

210

3.6

210

30

20

100

60

3

3

1

0

0

0

1407

551

Stylosanthes guianensis Alupe 'C'

5.0

210

4.5

210

45

40

(90)

180

2

1

1

1

0

0

4175


Stylosanthes scabra cv Fitzroy

5.0

210

4.0

210

45

35

100

90

3

3

1

0

0

0

4112


Stylosanthes scabra cv Seca

5.0

210

4.0

210

60

50

100

90

3

3

1

0

0

0

4127


Site 1: Katumani NDFRS
Site 2: Kiboko R.R. Station
RPBR : Peak Bulk Rating
Seed Production: 0 = nil, 3 = good
Pest/Disease: 0-1, 3 = severe
EDM yield: at 11 months.
- Not available


1985

1986

Rainfall (mm)

Oct

Nov

Dec

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jne

Jul

Aug

Sept

Site 1

85

57

137

63

-

43

163

100

7

-

-

-

Site 2













Table 2. List of accessions used in sward studies.


 

Present in planting

number

Mean sowing rate kg/ha

1

2

3

4


Alysicarpus rugosus CPI 52351

*

*

*

*

4.3

Alysicarpus rugosus CPI 30034



*


4.3

Cassia rotundifolia Q10057

*




5.2

Cassia rotundifolia cv Wynn


*

*

*

5.2

Centrosema pascuorum cv Cavalade

*

*

*


26.1

Centrosema pascuorum CPI 65950

*

*



26.1

Centrosema schottii CPI 82271

*

*



26.1

Centrosema schottii CPI 76010

*

*



26.1

Centrosema virginianum CQ 2748



*

*

26.1

Clitoria ternatea CPI 48337

*

*

*

*

43.8

Clitoria ternatea CPI 47187

*

*

*

*

43.8

Clitoria ternatea CPI 49963

*

*

*

*

43.8

Desmanthus virgatus CPI 40071

*

*

*

*

9.8

Desmodium intortum cv Greenleaf

*

*

*

*

7.8

Dolichos Lablab K1002


*

*

*

89.0

Lablab purpureus cv Rongai

*

*

*

*

9.5

Lotononis bainesii cv Miles

*




6.1

Macrotyloma africanum CPI 24972


*

*

*

6.1

Macrotyloma africanum CPI 60207


*

*

*

6.1

Macrotyloma daltonii CPI 60303


*

*


16.2

Macroptilium atropurpureum cv Siratro

*

*

*

*

9.1

Mucuna sp




*

160.5

Neonotonia wightii K75.2366

*

*

*

*

6.8

Rhyncosia minima CPI 52713

*

*



10.8

Rhyncosia malacophylla K18176



*

*

10.8

Stylosanthes capitata CPI 55843

*




7.1

Stylosanthes guianensis cv Graham

*

*



7.1

Stylosanthes guianensis cv Cook



*

*

7.1

Stylosanthes hamata cv Verano

*

*

*

*

7.1

Stylosanthes scabra cv Fitzroy

*

*

*

*

7.1

Stylosanthes scabra cv Seca

*




7.1

Stylosanthes fruticosa CPI 41219A

*

*

*

*

7.1

Vigna trilobata CPI 13671

*




10.8

Vigna unguiculata cv M66


*

*

*

82.4

Vigna unguiculata cv Red Caloona

*

*

*


82.4

Sward Experiments

The most complete data set currently available is for the first planting at the Maruba site. The pattern of dry-matter accumulation varied greatly between accessions as shown in Figure la. Single-season grain legumes such as Vigna unguiculata cv Red Caloona produced modest levels of dry matter after the first rainy season (see Harvest 1) but none thereafter. The dual purpose (forage/grain) legumes, such as Lablab purpureus (cv Rongai) were the most productive after the first and second rainy seasons (see Harvests 1 and 2) but declined thereafter (see Harvest 3). Maximum for the 18 other accessions tested was only 11% of the biomass produced by lablab purpureus. Legumes such as Alysicarpus rugosus, Stylosanthes scabra and Neonotonia wightii needed two rainy seasons to reach the production levels of an accession like Lablab purpureus. Thereafter, strong perennial species such as S. scabra and N. wightii had a clear advantage whilst annuals such as A. rugosus declined over the long dry season.

Figure 1a. Relative dry-matter yield (expressed as a percentage of the maximum dry-matter yield) for five legume swards grown at Maruba, Kenya. Swards were planted on 30-10-85 and the third harvest was taken 327 days later on 22-9-86. Absolute dry-matter yield in tonnes ha 1 is shown in parentheses for each harvest.

The first sward plantings at Katumani also provided an opportunity to compare the productivity of a relatively large number of Stylosanthes species under the cool dry conditions of the midlands of eastern Kenya. In all, six accessions from five species were included in this planting as shown in Figure 1b. None of the long season annuals, biennial or perennial species produced any significant levels of biomass by the end of the first season. After this time, however, the Stylos were all relatively productive with the S. scabra cultivars, Fitzroy and Seca the most outstanding (3.4 to 4.4 tonnes ha-1), followed by S. guianensis cv Graham (2.5 to 3.5 tonnes ha-1). The least adapted Stylo to this region was S. hamata cv Verano.

Figure 1b. Relative dry-matter yield (expressed as a percentage of the maximum for the particular harvest) for six Stylosanthes accessions grown at Maresha, Kenya. Other details as Figure 1a.

Leucaena Experiment

The first two destructive harvests from the Leucaena experiment have now been completed. Dry matter data is shown in Figure 2. From the preliminary data, the cultivar Peru appears to be the most productive in terms of leaf production, whilst L. diversifolia CPI 33820 was producing the largest amount of wood,

Figure 2. Dry weight data from first cut of Leucaena accessions. Planted: 4/4/86; First cut: 29/12/86.

Discussion

The potential role of forage and browse legumes in the semi-arid midlands of Kenya is in smallholder farming systems. Legumes could conceivably be used as inter-crops/alley-crops with cereals, in erosion control, in terrace bank stabilisation, in the improvement of degraded, non-productive grassland or as simple cut-and-carry fodder banks. The range of growth habit and persistence within the plant material being evaluated extends from the short twining annual Macrotyloma africanum to the small perennial tree Leucaena. Further experimentation (preferably on farms) is required to sort out the respective roles of material available, but the results from the experiments described here indicate that a good range of well-adapted leguminous material is now available.

Materials recommended for further testing in more favourable environments in the region (as characterised by Site 1 at Katumani NDFRS) are Cassia rotundifolia cv Wynn, Desmanthus virgatus K14456, Lablab purpureus cv Rongai, Macrotyloma africanum K14348, Neonotonia wightii K2366, Stylosanthes guianensis 'Alupe C' and Stylo scabra cv Fitzroy and 'Seca'. At less favourable sites (similar to Kiboko, Site 2) this list is reduced to Desmanthus virgatus and Stylosanthes scabra.

With the expansion of evaluation work to two other sites (3 and 4) and the inclusion of more plant material - from the Kenya Plant Quarantine Station at Muguga, from a small, indigenous plant collection and from further introduction from CSIRO, Queensland - the range of accessions being tested has recently increased. While evaluation of the following lines Aeschynomene americana cv Glenn, Cassia pilosa CPI 57503, Lotononis angolensis CPI 62202, Macrotyloma axillare cv Archer, Macrotyloma sp. (indigenous), Mucuna pruriens aff., Rhyncosia malacophylla (Synon. sennarensis), Rhyncosia totta and Stylo guianensis cv Cook is incomplete, they all show considerable promise.

The critical role of legume seed nurseries cannot be over-emphasised. Once key lines have been identified, seed requests from research stations and research or extension officers cannot be met if supply is a constraint. The nurseries should be established in areas where demands on irrigation, man-power and supervision are easily met. Work is underway this season to produce experimental quantities of seed of the promising accessions noted above.

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the support of Mr. S.N. Muturi, Director of Agriculture, Kenya; Mr. P.K. Kusewa, Director of Katumani, NDFRS; Dr. D. Okioga, Director of the Plant Quarantine Station, KARI, Muguga and Dr. B. Woie, Director of Kiboko Range Research Station. We also thank numerous officers and staff of Katumani NDFRS. To ACIAR we are grateful for the funds provided to carry out the project.

References

Chabeda, A.E.O. 1976. Drought resistance in some Kenya grasses and legumes. Annual Report. National Agricultural Research Station, Kitale, Kenya.

Ibrahim, K.N. 1981. Forage plant introduction. Technical Report No. 3 Project TF-KEN 29 (NOR). FAO, Rome.

Van Soest, L.J.M. 1986. Exploration and evaluation of grasses for seed production Kenya. Eastern region of Kenya. Working paper. Project TF-KEN 29 (NOR). FAO, Rome.

Wilton, A.C. 1976. Exploration and evaluation of grasses for seed production in Kenya. Working paper. Project TF-KEN 29 (NOR). FAO, Rome.

Appendix 1. Legume-evaluation: Accession list.


CPI

K

Origin

Site

Aeschynomene americana

91145

19712

Mexico

1

Aeschynomene americana

cv Glenn

19897

Mexico

1,4

Aeschynomene elegans

37552

19714

Argentina

1

Aeschynomene falcata

cv Bargoo

19715

Paraguay

1,4

Aeschynomene villosa

37235

19716

Mexico

1

Aeschynomene villosa

91113

19720

Mexico

1

Alysicarpus glumaceus

52366

14449

Madagascar

1,2

Alysicarpus hamosus

94491

14374

Oman

1,2

Alysicarpus longifolius

94490

14376

Oman

1,2

Alysicarpus monilifer

52343

14377

Madagascar

1,2

Alysicarpus rugosus

30034

14382

India

1,2,3,4

Alysicarpus rugosus

52348

14383

Zimbabwe

1

Alysicarpus rugosus

52351

14384

Malawi

1,2,3,4

Alysicarpus rugosus

76980

14447

Zambia

1

Alysicarpus rugosus

94489

14395

Ethiopia

1,2

Alysicarpus rugosus

-

(50)

Kenya

1,2

Alysicarpus vaginalis

34149

14386

Nicaragua

1,2,4

Arachis monticola

CQ990

14388

-

1

Arachis pintoi

58113

14416

Brazil

1

Cassia pilosa

57503

14451

Venezuela

1,2,4

Cassia rotundifolia

86172

19724

Mexico

1

Cassia rotundifolia

86178

19725

Mexico

1

Cassia rotundifolia

Q10057

14450

Brazil

1

Cassia rotundifolia

cv. Wynn

18177

-

1,2,3,4

Centrosema acutifolium

92874

14391

Brazil

1,2

Centrosema acutifolium

94303

14390

Colombia

1

Centrosema brasilianus

55698

14417

Brazil

1,2,4

Centrosema macrocarpum aff

78358

20170

Brazil

4

Centrosema pascuorum

65950

14392

Equador

1,2,3,4

Centrosema pascuorum

cv Cavalcade

14418

-

1,2,3,4

Centrosema plumieri

60477

14393

Brazil

1,2

Centrosema plumieri

82269

14394

Cuba

1,2

Centrosema pubescens

43197

20171

Colombia

4

Centrosema pubescens

46543

14395

Guatemala

1,2

Centrosema pubescens

58575

20172

Colombia

4

Centrosema pubescens

63895

14396

Brazil

1,2,4

Centrosema pubescens

79630

20173

-

4

Centrosema pubescens

92721

14397

Colombia

1

Centrosema pubescens

cv Belalto

14332

-

1,2

Centrosema pubescens

cv Centro

14419

-

1,2

Centrosema schottii

76010

14398

Mexico

1,2,3

Centrosema schottii

82271

14445

Cuba

1,2,3

Centrosema virginianum

CQ2748

14399

-

1,2,3,4

Centrosema virginianum

91142

14400

Mexico

1,2,3,4

Clitoria ternatea

47187

14402

Sudan

1,2,3,4

Clitoria ternatea

48337

14403

Tanzania

1,2,3,4

Clitoria ternatea

49963

14404

-

1,2,3,4

Desmanthus bicocnutus

91162

14438

Mexico

1

Desmanthus subulatus

90857

14406

Mexico

1

Desmanthus virgatus

40071

14456

Brazil

1,2,3,4

Desmanthus virgatus

55719

14407

Venezuela

1,2

Desmanthus virgatus

65947

14405

Equador

1,2

Desmanthus virgatus

78373

14408

Argentina

1,2

Desmanthus virgatus

83570

14409

Brazil

1,2,4

Desmanthus virgatus

84508

14410

Mexico

1,2

Desmanthus virgatus

85178

14411

Mexico

1,2

Desmanthus virgatus

90750

14412

Mexico

1,2

Desmanthus virgatus

91146

14413

Mexico

1,2

Desmanthus virgatus

91326

14414

Mexico

1,2,4

Desmanthus virgatus

92818

14415

Belize

1,2,4

Desmodium dichotosum

47186

-

-

1,2

Desmodium intortum

cv Greenleaf

14455

-

1,2,3,4

Desmodium intortum

91135

14338

Mexico

1,2

Desmodium oringlei

37232

14334

Mexico

1,2

Desmodium prostratum aff

91232

14336

Mexico

1,2

Desmodium setigeruam

52431

14340

Malawi

1,2

Desmodium subsericeum

78402

14335

Argentina

1,2

Desmodium wigginsii

90418

14337

U.S.A.

1,2

Desmodium sp. D

91186

14453

Mexico

1

Desmodium sp. D

91212

14333

Mexico

1,2

Dolichos sp.

24973

14452

Zimbabwe

1,2,4

Dolichos sericeus aff

-

(128)

Kenya

1,4

Lablab purpureus

30702

14466

Burma

1

Lablab purpureus

41222

14341

Burma

1,2

Lablab purpureus

cv Highworth

14463

-

1,2

Lablab purpureus

cv Rongai

14420

Kenya

1,2,3,4

Lablab purpureus

-

1002

Kenya

1,2,3,4

Lespedeza striate

cv Kaloe

19899

U.S.A.

1,4

Lotononis angolensis

62202

14435

-

1,2,4

Lotononis bainesii

cv Miles

14421

-

1,2,4

Macroptilium atropurpureum

84989

14343

Mexico

1,4

Macroptilium atropurpureum

84999

14344

Mexico

1,2

Macroptilium atropurpureum

90748

14468

Mexico

1,4

Macroptilium atropurpureum

90776

14469

Mexico

1,4

Macroptilium atropurpureum

90821

14465

Mexico

1

Macroptilium atropurpureum

cv Siratro

14461

Mexico

1,2,3,4

Macroptilium heterophyllum

90448

14345

Mexico

1,4

Macroptilium heterophyllum

91144

14467

Mexico

1

Macroptilium heterophyllum

91222

14346

Mexico

1

Macroptilium lathyroides

cv Murray

14464

India

1,2

Macroptilium longipendunculatum

55751

14422

Brazil

1,2

Macroptilium martii

49780

14347

Brazil

1,2,4

Macroptilium prostrate

78450

14342

Argentina

1

Macrotyloma africanum

24972

14348

Zambia

1,2,3,4

Macrotyloma africanum

60207

14349

Zambia

1,2,3,4

Macrotyloma axillare

cv Archer

14462

-

1,4

Macrotyloma daltonii

60303

14350

Namibia

1,2,3,4

Macrotyloma daltonii

94496

14351

-

1

Macrotyloma uniflorum

cv Leichardt

14460

-

1,2

Macrotyloma sp.

-

(129)

Kenya

1,4

Medicago rugosa

cv Paraponto

19905

-

1,4

Medicago rugosa

cv Sapo Gama

19906

-

1,4

Medicago sativa

cv H. River

19900

-

1,4

Medicago scutella

cv Sava

19907

-

1,4

Medicago trunculata

cv Jemalong

19908

Australia

1,4

Mucuna pruriens aff

-

(119)

Kenya

1,4

Neonotonia wightii

-

2366 (67)

Kenya

1,2,3,4

Neonotonia wightii

-

(35)

Kenya

1,2,3,4

Neonotonia wightii

-

(150)

Kenya

1,4

Rhyncosia densiflora

52690

14353

Tanzania

1,2

Rhyncosia edulis

52127

14352

Paraguay

1,2

Rhyncosia malacophylla

-

18176

Tanzania

1,2,3,4

Rhyncosia minima

52713

14355

Tanzania

1,2,3

Rhyncosia minima

78473

14356

Argentina

1

Rhyncosia minima

84953

14357

Mexico

1,2

Rhyncosia minima aff

-

(14)

Kenya

1,2

Rhyncosia minima aff

-

(41)

Kenya

1,2

Rhyncosia minima aff

-

(45)

Kenya

1,2

Rhyncosia totta

52742

14358

Zambia

1,4

Stylosanthes capitata

55843

14459

Brazil

1,2,4

Stylosanthes fruticosa

412194

14426

Sudan

1,2,3,4

Stylosanthes fruticosa

-

(33)

Kenya

1,2

Stylosanthes guianensis

79637

14364

Brazil

1,2,4

Stylosanthes guianensis

-

Alupe C

-

1,2,4

Stylosanthes guianensis

-

Alupe I

-

1,2

Stylosanthes guianensis

cv Cook

18189

Colombia

1,2,3,4

Stylosanthes guianensis

cv Graham

14427

Bolivia

1,2,3,4

Stylosanthes guianensis

cv Oxley

19901

Argentina

1,4

Stylosanthes hamata

49080

14365

Colombia

1,2

Stylosanthes hamata

70522

14366

U.S.A.

1,2

Stylosanthes hamata

73507

14367

Antigua

1,2

Stylosanthes hamata

cv Verano

14428

Venezuela

1,2,3,4

Stylosanthes humilis

61674

14368

Venezuela

1,2

Stylosanthes humilis

cv Greenvale

14429

-

1,2

Stylosanthes scabra

55856

18190

Brazil

1,2

Stylosanthes scabra

cv Fitzroy

14431

-

1,2,3,4

Stylosanthes scabra

cv Seca

14430

-

1,2,3,4

Stylosanthes scabra

-

8115

-

1,2

Stylosanthes scabra

-

8111

-

1,2

Stylosanthes scabra

-

82105

-

1,2

Stylosanthes subsericea

38605

14457

Guatemala

1,2

Stylosanthes sympodialis

67704(B)

14369

Equador

1,2

Stylosanthes viscosa

34904

14371

Brazil

1,2

Stylosanthes sp.

85895

14359

Mexico

1,2

Stylosanthes sp.

85899

14360

Mexico

1,2

Stylosanthes sp.

86137

14361

Mexico

1,2

Stylosanthes sp.

87469

14458

Mexico

1,2

Stylosanthes sp.

87479

14362

Mexico

1,2

Stylosanthes sp.

87484

14423

Mexico

1,2

Stylosanthes sp.

87485

14424

Mexico

1,2

Stylosanthes sp.

87487

14425

Mexico

1,2

Stylosanthes sp.

91138

14363

Mexico

1,2

Trifolium repens

cv Haifa

19902

Israel

1,4

Trifolium sp.

-

(26)

Kenya

1,3

Vigna ambacensis

47188

14433

Sudan

1,2

Vigna frutescens

-

(126)

Kenya

1

Vigna luteola

ILCA 113

18172

Belize

1,4

Vigna oblongifolia

60430

14372

-

1,2

Vigna praecox

-

(130)

Kenya

4

Vigna trilobata

13671

14434

-

1,2,3

Vigna unguiculata

60442

14313

-

1,2

Vigna unguiculata

60452


Kenya

1,2,4

Vigna unguiculata

cv Red Caloona

14436

-

1,2,3,4

Vigna unguiculata

-

M66

Kenya

1,2,3,4

Vigna vexillata

-

(122)

Kenya

1,4

Voandzeia subterranea

-

18174

Mali

4

Zornia sp.

-

(123)

Kenya

1


Previous Page Top of Page Next Page